Good Evening everyone hereto attached Motion filed before the United States Court of Appeals where GOP Chief Judge exercised above the law racist Civil Rights Violations denying Appellant any relief in the courts;

1.) Stay tune to the Complaint filed against IBC see the Reply brief as it relates to this case posted April 14, 2012

2.) A new Post will be featured every day demonstrating just how racist said judges dispensate their rulings against African American, Hispanic men in this State.

               

                                                    Certificate of Service

  

I Joe Louis Lawrence, plaintiff, certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice of Motion and Motion to Disqualify Judge Frank H. Easterbrook Chief Judge and Appointment of Counsel to all parties recorded in said Notice of Motion via regular mail.

Dated August 27, 2007

                                                                                  _____________________          

                                                                                    Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                            IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Joe Louis Lawrence                          )       Appeal from the United States

   Plaintiff-Appellant                           )       District Court for the Northern

    No. 07-2287 VS.                           )       District of Illinois, Eastern Division

                                                          )       No. 07 C 1191

Interstate Brands Corporation           )

Chicago Transit Authority                  )

Chicago Police Department               )     

   Defendant-Appellee                        )

                                                 NOTICE OF MOTON

Please be advised that on September 20, 2007, A “RESPONSE TO RULE TO SHOW CAUSE –PRO SE APPELLANT” has been filed before the United States Court of Appeals.

: Cook County States Attorney                  I.B.C./Wonder bread

        Dick Devine                                     12 East Armour Blvd.

         28 North Clark Street, Suite 300      Kansas City, MO. 64111

         Chicago, Ill. 60602                           Legal Dept.

       Chicago Transit Authority Legal Dept.      Chicago Police Department

       Rachael L. Kaplan                                           Phil Cline                         

       567 West Lake Street Chicago, IL. 60603    3510 South Michigan

       Chicago, Ill. 60661-1498                              Chicago, Ill. 60616

                              

        Standish E. Willis

      407 South Dearborn

         Chicago, Ill 60603

I affirm the above as being true.

                                                                                            Respectfully Submitted

                                                                                             Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                               P.O. Box 490075

                                                                                             Chicago, Ill. 60649

                                                                                               Plaintiff-Appellant

                                                         IN THE

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                       FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                          CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

                                                

                                          

Joe Louis Lawrence                          )       Appeal from the United States

   Plaintiff-Appellant                           )       District Court for the Northern

    VS                                                 )       District of Illinois, Eastern Division

   No. 07-2287                                   )       No. 07 C 1191

Interstate Brands Corporation           )

Chicago Transit Authority                  )  

Chicago Police Department               )

   Defendant-Appellee                        )

 “A RESPONSE TO RULE TO SHOW CAUSE – PRO SE APPELLANT”

   Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.      

   Based thereon, plaintiff-appellant respectfully moves this Honorable Court who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure not to dismiss said matter presented before this court but grant Special Consideration in this matter, due to the unlawful injustices recorded in said Affidavit compelling this court to act in accordance to the Laws of the United States Constitution Instanter to execute jurisdiction over the parties involved in this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.

             September 20, 2007

                                                                               Respectfully Submitted

                                                                                Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                 P.O. Box 490075

                                                                                 Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

                                                      IN THE

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                       FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                          CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

                                           AFFIDAVIT

                                   In Support of Motion

   “RESPONSE TO RULE TO SHOW CAUSE- PRO SE APPELLANT”

I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:

1.)          Appellant filed a legally sufficient Motion with an Affidavit (unchallenged by all attorneys thereby validating the veracity of everything recorded in said Motion) for Disqualification of Judge –Personal Bias or Prejudice {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} and Reconsideration for Appointment of Counsel (Standish Willis) and Extension of Time to File Brief, August 24, 2007;

2.)      That Chief Judge Frank H. Easterbrook without any legal precedence authority RULED on the Motion filed against him denied it entirely August 30, 2007;

3.)      Appellant’s wife mental and physical condition has deteriorated rapidly, in that, she has submitted numerous falsehoods to the courts, trying to escape the horrible unjust realities Appellant is facing in the courts affecting the children:  

A-  Appellant’s Bipolar, Oppositional Defiant Disorder daughter tried to attack him, but was physically restrained by him without violence;

B-    Appellant’s wife informed police her husband “never choked or hit our daughter, she was trying to attack him”;

C-   DCFS got involved, due to an unprofessional investigation, political influence, Appellant was charged with abuse no police report was filed against him , he has no criminal background or history, but his wife was charged with abuse in 2004;

D-   Appellant filed an Appeal in the Administrative Law Division, before Judge Bruce Lester;   

4.)      That because Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower, a Chicago Police Officer had an incestuous sexual relations with her natural biological father, William Jenkins Hightower who was a police officer at the time of the affair, a child was conceived!

A-  William J. Hightower as a police officer impregnated another biological daughter before Francoise and was arrested (1976-1977) for that act and allowed to return back to work as a police officer and retire, (Francoise confided in Appellant and asked him to help her because he was the only man she met who was not afraid of her father, He told appellant, “All of his daughters have good PUSSY” in front of her mother and her; He was very Cocky!

B-    That certain judges were allegedly paid off with bribes, political favors etc., to ignore his criminal acts and hers now as a Police officer;

C-   That Francoise was able to use her badge, political and any other influences necessary to falsify any and all documents on the State level, to say Appellant owed her child support where State records recorded Appellant owed no child support;

D-   She and her father with the help of an attorney Joseph V. Roddy garnisheed wages from CTA pay salary where there is no record of these garnishees; 

5.)        In September 17, 1987, case#85 D 068184, said paternity matter was dismissed against appellant with an attorney (Robert Egan);

A-  That Francoise and her father with incredible political influence and favors was able to purchase the type of justice necessary to have them to enter orders against  Appellant where he was never served, never blood tests to determine if said child was his;

B-    Appellant was arrested incarcerated for allegedly owing $29,100.00, when he fought it, it went up to $50,000.00

6.)      That the CTA under the authority and direction of Kent Stephen Ray, Bruce Talaga, Kathleen Herrmann and William Farley engineered and conspired with the above attorneys of the paternity matter destroyed personnel records so as to prevent others of learning how monies were extorted from his wages;

A-  That because of the series of errors CTA officials made against him, preventing him from reinstatement, they embezzled his wages while off work due to work-related injury;

B-    They had Judge Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney to issue a Bogus warrant against appellant for an Order of Protection against Francoise which later turned into Contempt of Court;

C-   That unbeknown to Appellant as he stood before Judge David Delgado (personal matter re: wife and children) he was handcuffed and shackled to a chair where CTA had a investigator M. Burton to take his silver badge (26115) and keys;

D-   That Sheriff’s and other law enforcement personnel said fuck what the Judge said “we have orders to protect you,  you have put some heat on a very powerful person involved in your case”

E-      That the CTA administrators tried to destroy Appellant’s personnel file to reflect he never worked for the company, what they did not know everything they destroyed, Appellant had a copy and never revealed the sources, initially the FBI was shocked in amazement at some of the details;       

7.)       That William Borah an attorney from Hickory Hills, received knowledge Appellant was about to experience the storm of his life, that involved IBC for engineering the Class Action Complaint against them in Federal Court:

A-  That storm was IBC collaborating with CTA attorneys and Assistant States Attorneys bringing up the child support case with Francoise;

B-    What the Assistant States Attorneys and Francoise did not know was that Appellant was a legally certified IBC wonder bread employee but was on Welfare;

C-   That the States Attorneys unlawfully abused their positions and authority took him to court on behalf of the Illinois Dept. of Public Aid obtained all types of unjust court orders, especially being held in Contempt of Court for allegedly owing $29,100.00 and incarcerated for not having any money and ordered to look for a job to save IBC for the criminal acts of Racial Retaliation etc.;  

D-   IBC embezzled approximately $50,000.00 of Workman’s Compensation checks while Appellant was receiving Public Aid Welfare;

E-      That attorney Thomas W. Webner committed perjury in court informing judge Judge Murphy, appellant was not an employee of IBC /wonder bread during Nov.-Dec. 2005;

F-       That attorney Mark P. Matranga notified the Industrial Commissioner Arbitrator Appellant returned to work and had no dependents, March 31, 2005; before Gilberto M. Galicia;    

8.)      IBC attorneys and employees exercised the same strategy as the above, to cover up all of the Racial Retaliatory Unlawful Criminal Acts of Fraud and Criminal Conspiracy where they stole his wages:

A-  That there was a Criminal Universal Collaboration of all Racial Conspirators working together to keep Appellant Financially Oppressed, Denied in all courts, Destroy him and his family Economically by whatever means to prevent others of learning how Organized Racism is Here in this City and State;

B-    That because everyone involved was CAUCASION felt they had nothing to fear because Appellant was not only a Pro Se, but most important a “NIGGER”, in that, no judge was going to take the word of a NIGGER, over them where they were concerned;

9.)      Appellant’s mother Patricia Mitchell who is retired and has custody of 3 grandchildren Cleo, Marcellus and Keon all minors:

A-  That she is unable to receive food stamps or any type of financial assistance because Gloria Harrison and her mother Lois Nance is receiving Welfare and Social Security for the children, that has been in her custody since June 2006;

B-    Said mother is stressed out everybody is engaging in some type of criminal racial activity there does not appear to be help in sight, the criminals are running the City while the just is suffering in an unmerciful manner;   

10.)  Appellant is stressed out legally, mentally and physically unable to sleep, no appetite, hereto attached, letter from a Board Certified Psychiatrist stating, the affects said legal matters have impacted upon him, he is unable to pay any bills (light, gas, rent etc.,)

           A-Appellant is scheduled to see a Public Aid case worker to explain how is he able to remain in his apartment behind in rent?

           B- Appellant is virtually homeless with no place to go.    

11.)      Appellant is being DENIED Equal access to the Laws due to his SKIN COLOR, the courts have agreed with this disposition and all attorneys are in concert with the above as well, said courts have demonstrated systematically, Appellant is not a free man with Civil Rights he is a Prisoner, a Criminal, despite his intelligence, he has no intelligence, nor is he able to articulate legal issues of the Laws simply because he is a “NIGGER” he is less than any Caucasian with no education, less than the human he thinks himself to be, and as long as Appellant keeps rising up against the Injustices, telling on “WHITE FOLKS” reminding the courts of the wrongs inflicted upon him, as long as there is a RACIST JUDGE in authority, we the RACIST JUDGES in authority will do everything in our POWERS TO DESTROY, DENY JUSTICE, INCITE RACISM, EMBRACE RACISM, COMMIT GENOCIDAL INJUSTICE TO any NIGGER like the Pro Se Appellant because white men can do whatever they please to NIGGERS; Appellant’s Legal Chronology establishes that FACT.

A-  Said laws have been used to protect Racism and everyone who has perpetrated a role in said conspiracy

B-    Appellant has been Whipped, Beaten, many times Denied, Psychologically Traumatized, Economically Murdered, The Laws has been used as Water Hoses to keep him down on his ASS never to look up, the Ropes have been replaced with the DISPENSATION of Unconstitutional Application of Unjust Laws;      

12.)    Said Appellant wonders how is it he has applied the Laws and articulated the laws better than every RACIST lawyer who has challenged him every Judge SEES the INJUSTICE, IGNORES the INJUSTICE,  KNOWS of the INJUSTICE and EXPECTS him to COMMITT LEGAL SUICIDE by PRESENTING A  BRIEF IN AN ENVIRONMENT OF RACIAL ANIMOUS HATRED INJUSTICE!

If you work at a Circus and your job is to clean up ELEPHANT “MANURE” all day and you fail to shower, but dress up with fancy clothes, expensive fragrances attend gala festivities afterwards everyday. YOU are STINKING and are unaware of the foul odor, YOU are walking with because stink becomes YOU and YOU are in complete DENIAL, YOU are unable to SMELL yourself. RACISM is synonymous with “MANURE”, it is a DISEASE some are born with and will DIE with, it is a LEARNED DISEASE others pick up JUST to get along with the majority, they emulate negative behavior to be accepted because they are unable to think for themselves.

Look at all the “MANURE” that has affected the Appellant and his Family and how everyone has played a role SHOVELING “MANURE” never SHOWERING.    

13.)  That because of the magnitude of Racial Injustice Appellant had to overcome is the only reason why he is not employed, hereto attached, copy of said Resume, it is a Dam Shame a Black Man have to spend 15, 20 25 years of his life behind bars before he is free, a law School decides to do a paper on inmates and discover OOPs DNA, HE DID NOT DO IT, but in Appellant’s case everyone in this entire Legal System Knows of his INNONCENCE and the SYSTEMIC RACIAL DISPENSATION OF DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS, the Judges who are empowered to enforced the Laws did not because of the embarrassment that a non-licensed NIGGER did to them trapping them and their colleagues with their Laws.      

The Racial Injustice that is being experienced in Louisiana the Jena six is the same up here in the North (Chicago, Illinois).   

Wherefore the aforementioned reasons recorded above appellant moves this Honorable court to grant the motion in it’s entirety not DISMISSING this matter before the court but Special Consideration due to Medical and extraneous hardships on him and family.

                                                  Further Affiant Sayeth Not 

                                                         Respectfully submitted,

                                                          

                                                           Joe Louis Lawrence

                                  CERTIFICATE OF ATTORNEY PRO SE

   I hereby certify that I am the Attorney Pro Se plaintiff-appellant in the above entitled cause, and as such prepared the above affidavit and is cognizant of the proceedings there is and that such affidavit and application are made in good faith and not for the purpose of hindrance or delay.

                                                               Respectfully Submitted

                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                   Attorney Pro Se

                                                                 P.O. Box 490075  

                                                            Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075  

Monday August 27, 2007