OLD SCHOOL RACIAL HATE HAS MADE IT'S WAY TO THE JUDICIAL ARENA DEMONSTRATING IN THE YEAR 2026 THE COLORED OR BLACK MAN OR WOMAN IS STILL NOT FREE AS MANY WANT TO ASSUME AND BELIEVE

FEDERAL JUDGE JOHN ROBERT BLAKEY WHOM BARACK OBAMA APPOINTED AND HE HATES BLACK OR COLORED PEOPLE AND USES HIS ROBE BY ABUSING HIS AUTHORITY TO DEMONSTRATE HIS RAGE.

WHO IS THE CIVIL RIGHTS PERSON WHO WILL TAKE THE MANTLE TO THE NEXT ERA ADDRESSING THE DEMOCRATS SYSTEMIC HATE AGAINST BLACK AND COLORED PEOPLE IN AMERICA--EVEN THOUGH LAWS ARE ON THE BOOKS JUDGES ARE ACTING OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION WHEN IT COMES TO COLORED OR BLACKS BUT IS ONLY RECEIVING PUSHBACK IF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE BEING AFFECTED WHY IS THAT?

   1.)  THIS JUDGE IS SHOWING HIS UNTOUCHABLE RACIST ARROGANCE BY EGREGIOUSLY VIOLATING MY CIVIL RIGHTS AND IGNORING LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT PARTICULARIZED (PURSUANT TO FED RULE 8 AND 9) WHAT OTHER RACIST IRISH AND POLISH JUDGES DID AND HOW SO MANY TRIED COVERING IT UP HE CLOSED HIS EYES BECAUSE HE IS USING HIS ROBE TO PROTECT THEM.

   2.)  NOW, I AM LITIGATING AGAINST 4 LAW FIRMS AND ABOUT 11 ATTORNEYS, I FILED THE PROPER MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY AND TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS DUE TO MY INDIGENT STATUS.

   3.)   HE DENIED MY MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT FOR ATTORNEY AND TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND EVERY MOTION, I FILED IN THE FEDERAL COURT, HE STATED "HE IS ALSO A COLLEGE GRADUATE AND HAS DEMONSTRATED AN ABILITY TO INITIATE THIS LAWSUIT AND FILE MOTIONS." 

         A- I REMEMBER A FORMER CHIEF FEDERAL JUDGE, FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, WHEN I FILED FOR AN APPOINTMENT OF AN ATTORNEY AND STILL ON PUBLIC AID TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE DENIED ME THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL Appellant prepared a brief defeating the Cities Corporation Counsels, CTA’s law professors and Wonder Breads high powered law firm from Saint Louis Missouri (Bioff Finucane & Coffey) every lawyer lied and committed fraud as well as the Federal judges Diane Sykes, Ann Claire Williams and Kenneth Ripple resented Appellant’s academic proficiency of the laws and impressive brief because of his skin color said judges did not have the legal aptitude of knowing or realizing that order due to it being induced, due to “FRAUD”,  “VOID” a “NULLITY” due to said judges not following their oath and laws of the United States Constitution.  

    That judge Frank H. Easterbrook denied Appellant Counsel comparing him to a transsexual prisoner in prison citing Farmer v Haas, 990 F.2d 319 (1993).

   BEING ON WELFARE DOES NOT QUALIFY AS BEING INDIGENT? OR IS IT OK FOR CAUASIANS TO BE ON WELFARE AND RECEIVE LEGAL REPRESENTATION?

   4.)   PEOPLE ASSUME AND WANT TO BELIEVE WHATEVER A JUDGE SAYS OR DOES IS CORRECT-- BUT HERE THE JUDGE IS GAS LIGHTING EVERYONE WHO DON'T KNOW THE LAWS---THIS JUDGE ACCEPTED A MOTION FROM AN ATTORNEY JAN 2, 2026 WHILE THE FEDERAL BUILDING WAS CLOSED FOR THE HOLIDAYS AND RULED ON THE MOTION JAN 6, 2026 GRANTING VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., WHO WAS IN DEFAULT, AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER.

         A- SEVERAL THINGS WRONG HERE, THE JUDGE WAS IN VIOLATION OF HIS OWN STANDING ORDER RULE, THE ATTORNEY WAS SUPPOSED TO NOTICE THE MOTION TO MY ATTENTION AND SET IT FOR THE MOTION CALL FOR JAN 14, AT 11:00 AM.

         B- HOW CAN A JUDGE AND ATTORNEY COLLABORATE ON A HOLIDAY WEEKEND AND HE AND THE JUDGE BOTH FILE THEIR DOCUMENTS ON THE SAME JAN 6, 2026, AND JUDGE BLAKEY IGNORED MY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED JAN 5, BECAUSE NONE OF THE ATTORNEYS COMPLIED TO HIS COURT ORDER OF DEC 29, 2025 OR MY DEFAULT MOTION FILED JAN 7, 2026 AND SET ALL MOTIONS FOR JAN 14, AT 11 AM, HE DENIED EVERY MOTION AND STRUCK ALL OF MY COURT DATES BEFORE HIM.

        C- THE COURT REPORTER DOES NOT HAVE NO RECORD OF WHAT TOOK PLACE BECAUSE HE DID EVERYTHING UNDER THE TABLES WITH NO BODY EVER APPEARING BEFORE HIM.

DEMOCRATIC JUDGE RONALD BARTKOWICZ A FORMER CTA ATTORNEY IN WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION CONCOCTED A BOGUS WARRANT FOR THE CTA AND IRISH ATTORNEY JOSEPH V. RODDY TO UNLAWFULLY REMOVE ME FROM MY EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CTA TO KEEP THEM FROM PAYING ME MONIES FROM BACK WAGES DUE FROM BEING OFF WORK FROM FEB 1990-DEC 1994.

   5.)   IN CHICAGO IF YOU PAY OFF THE RIGHT DEMOCRAT OR JUDGE, THEY CAN MAKE ANYTHING ILLEGAL LOOK LEGAL BUT, IN THIS CASE, THE TRUTH IS OUT, CTA PENSION DEPARTMENT HAD MY RECORDS TO REFLECT MY RETIREMENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR THIS YEAR BUT SOMEONE UNDER ALLEGEDLY KENT STEPHEN RAY THE GENERAL ATTORNEY TO DELETE ALL OF MY STARTING DATES OR PERTINENT INFORMATION FROM MY PROFILE ON THE DATABASE.

   6.)   I AM A CERTIFIED CTA EMPLOYEE WITH NO INCOME FROM THEM BEEN AN EMPLOYEE SINCE MARCH 1987 BUT WAS SCHEDLUED TO RETURN BACK TO WORK FROM A WORK-RELATED INJURY DEC 1, 1994, TOTALING 32 YEARS MEN HAVE BEEN IMPRISONED FOR CRIMES THEY HAVE NEVER COMMITTED IN DEMOCRATIC CITIES, SO MY EXPERIENCE IS NO DIFFERENT, I THANK GOD, MY EXPERIENCE WAS OUTSIDE THE PRISON SYSTEM. 

          A- MOST IRISH, POLISH ETHNIC MALES AND CERTAIN HOMOSEXUALS HATE EDUCATED BLACK OR COLORED MEN AND WILL DO ANYTHING AS DEMONSTRATED IN THIS POST WHAT THEY ARE WILLING TO DO MAKING SURE NO ONE OF ANY EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND EVER RECEIVE ANY JUSTICE UNDER THEIR AUTHORITY.

THE JUDGE THREATENED ME IN OPEN COURT IF, I CONTINUED TO BE REINSTATED TO THE CTA AGAIN, HE WAS GOING TO LOCK ME UP AGAIN AND TOLD ME TO GO DRIVE A SCHOOL BUS.

I WAS FORCED ON PUBLIC AID AND HAS BEEN ON THERE FOR ABOUT 25 OR MORE YEARS AND HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES REMINDED IT IS BETTER THAN BEING BEHIND BARS IN PRISON.

NOW THE JUDGE TOOK ME OFF MY JOB AND WAS TRYING TO HELP HIS GOOD OL BOY BUDDY JOSEPH V. RODDY EXTORT MONEY FROM A PATERNITY CASE, THAT WAS DISMISSED IN SEPT 1987 UNDER RICHARD J. DALEY AS A STATES ATTORNEY WITH AN ATTORNEY AND TWO INDEPENDENT PATERNITY TESTS, THAT EXCLUDED ME FROM BEING THE FATHER.

JOSEPH V RODDY RE FILED ANOTHER CASE ON BEHALF OF POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER AKA FRANKIE, I HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF AND THEY DEFAULTED AND NEVER WAS THEIR ANY CHILD SUPPORT EVER ORDERED MAY 18, 1988.

THEY MANUFACTURED ARREARS AND GOT GOOD OL BOY JUDGES TO GO ALONG WITH EVERY FRAUDULENT ORDER AT LEAST 30-45 DEMOCRATIC JUDGES WAS ON THIS CASE AND A REPUBLICAN JUDGE LESTER BONUGURU TOLD ME HE UNDERSTOOD WHAT WAS GOING ON AND THAT, I WAS EMBARRASSING A LOT OF ATTORNEYS NOT REALIZING, I AM EMBARRASING THEM, HE SIGNED A COURT ORDER IN 1994 TO CONTINUE TO BE REINSTATED WITH THE CTA BECAUSE, I WAS NOT DISCHARGED, AND THAT HE WAS GOING TO HELP ME, THEY IMMEDIATELY REMOVED THE JUDGE FROM MY CASE.