HOW DO YOU RECEIVE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS OR IN A FEDERAL COURT IF A FEDERAL JUDGE AND ATTORNEY ARE COLLUDING TOGETHER?
NELSON MANDELA SPENT 27 YEARS IN PRISON WRONGFULLY FIGHTING APARTHEID IN SOUTH AFRICA AND BECAME PRESIDENT
THURGOOD MARSHALL WAS A GIANT AN ICON FIGHTING FOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF OTHER BLACKS VICTIMIZED BY RACIAL INJUSTICES FOR THE NAACP BEFORE BECOMING THE FIRST BLACK SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.
I HAVE BEEN FIGHTING EGREGIOUS RACISM AND CORRUPTION IN THE COURTS AND AT NO TIME HAVE A JUDGE EVER RULED RIGHTEOUSLY OR JUST BUT HAS DESCRIBED MY PLEADINGS AS FRIVOLOUS, FANCIFUL INCOHERENT ETC.,
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS BUT NOT THE EQUAL RIGHTS OF ITS CITIZENS BORN IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1866 IS NOT RECOGNIZED BY ILLINOIS JUDGES WHEN IT COMES TO RECEIVING EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
HERE IS A SIMPLE CASE INVOLVING VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. WHO HAS DEFAULTED BUT AN ATTORNEY SOME HOW WAS ABLE TO COMMIT FRAUD AND EMAIL THE JUDGE ON A HOLIDAY (JAN 2, 2026) SEE THE PRINTOUT AND THE JUDGE RECEIVED HIS DOCUMENT AND ECUSED HIM FROM FOLLOWING FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BY NOTIFYING THE OTHER SIDE, WHICH IS MYSELF TO OBJECT OR DENY ITS FILING, THE COURT DATE SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOTICED FOR JAN 14, 2026 AT 11:00 AM.
BUT INSTEAD, THE JUDGE ENTERED A RULING UNLAWFULLY GRANTING THE ATTORNEY PERMISSION TO RESPOND ON A DEFAULT JAN 6, 2026, AND HE FILED HIS ANSWER HIS RESPONSE JAN 6, 2026.
DO ANYBODY ELSE SEE THIS MESS? JIM CROW LAWS ARE NOW IN THE FEDERAL COURT FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE
THIS IS WHY THE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY DON'T RESPECT ANY LAWS AFFECTING BLACK AND COLORED PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY HAVE JUDGES LIKE THIS WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO UPHOLD RACISM AND TYRANNY.
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE TO THIS INJUSTICE?
HE UNLAWFULLY THREATENED ME WITH SANCTIONS "If Plaintiff persists in pressing frivolous arguments, he may be subject to sanctions. Likewise, if Plaintiff persists in his refusal to meet and confer with Defendants to prepare a joint status report, as ordered, he may be subject to sanctions"
| Illinois Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | John Robert Blakey |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-12239 |
| Nature of Suit | 480 Other Statutes - Consumer Credit |
| Cause | 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Case Filed: | Oct 07, 2025 |
| Case in other court: | 26-01226 |
| Docket last updated: 02/10/2026 9:38 AM CST | |
| Friday, February 06, 2026 | ||
| 78 |  | MOTION by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence for attorney representation (bi,) |
| 77 | | APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits) (bi,) |
| 76 | | STATUS Report (Second Amended Initial Joint) by Trans Union LLC. (Blankenberger, Hope) |
| Thursday, February 05, 2026 | ||
| 75 | | CIRCUIT Rule 3(b) Fee Notice (bi,) |
| 74 | | ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of short record on appeal regarding notice of appeal71 ; USCA Case No. 26-1226 (bi,) |
| Tuesday, February 03, 2026 | ||
| 73 | | TRANSMITTED to the 7th Circuit the short record on notice of appeal71 . Notified counsel (axk, ) |
| 72 | | NOTICE of Appeal Due letter sent to counsel of record regarding notice of appeal71 (axk, ) |
| Monday, February 02, 2026 | ||
| 71 | | NOTICE of appeal by Joe Louis Lawrence regarding orders54 ,65 (Exhibits) (axk, ) |
| Friday, January 30, 2026 | ||
| 70 | | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for a stay pending appeal or for mandamus,68 and strikes the 2/4/26 Notice of Motion date. Mandamus constitutes "a drastic and extraordinary remedy reserved for really extraordinary causes"; "only exceptional circumstances amounting to a judicial usurpation of power or a clear abuse of discretion will justify the invocation of this extraordinary remedy." United States v. Henderson, 915 F.3d 1127, 1132 (7th Cir. 2019) (quoting Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004)). Here, the Court denied Plaintiff's motions for default and allowed Defendant Verizon to answer the complaint based upon the record, including Plaintiff's submissions regarding service. Those rulings remain well supported factually and legally, and Plaintiff's disagreement with them remains insufficient to merit a writ of mandamus. If Plaintiff persists in pressing frivolous arguments, he may be subject to sanctions. Likewise, if Plaintiff persists in his refusal to meet and confer with Defendants to prepare a joint status report, as ordered, he may be subject to sanctions. See67 at 1 (Defendants' joint status report, which notes that Plaintiff did not respond to Defendants' meet and confer efforts). The Court once again orders the parties to meet and confer and orders them to file an updated status report by 2/6/26, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial Status Conferences. If Plaintiff fails to participate in the meet and confer process, the Court will dismiss this case for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with this Court's orders. Mailed notice. (evw, ) |
| Wednesday, January 28, 2026 | ||
| 69 | | NOTICE of Motion by Joe Louis Lawrence for presentment of motion to stay and for injunction pending appeal or mandamus68 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 2/4/2026 at 11:00 AM (Exhibits) . (bi,) |
| 68 | | MOTION by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence to stay and for injunction pending appeal or mandamus . (bi,) |
| 67 | | STATUS Report (Amended Initial Joint) by Trans Union LLC. (Blankenberger, Hope) |
| Tuesday, January 27, 2026 | ||
| 65 | | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court denies Plaintiff's motion to disqualify63 and his motion seeking to vacate this Court's order allowing Defendant to file its answer64 because Plaintiff failed to notice them for presentment and because they lack merit. The parties' 1/28/26 status report deadline stands. Mailed notice. (evw, ) |
| Tuesday, January 20, 2026 | ||
| 64 | | MOTION by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence to vacate order on motion for leave to file,, terminate deadlines and hearings,54 (nsf, ) |
| 63 | | MOTION by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence to disqualify judge and , MOTION by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence for recuse the district judge pursuant to 28 USC 455(a) and (b)(1) due to a prima facie showing of bias & prejudice against the plaintiff. ( Received via Intake counter 1/20/26) (nsf, ) |
| 62 | | NOTICE by Joe Louis Lawrence of due process violations. (nsf, ) |
| Friday, January 09, 2026 | ||
| 61 | | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for default judgment57 and request for default59 and strikes the 1/7/26 notice of motion date (which in any event fails to comply with this Court's standing orders). Defendants have responded to the complaint, and Plaintiff's requests lack merit. The parties' 1/28/26 status report deadline stands. Mailed notice. (evw, ) |
| Thursday, January 08, 2026 | ||
| 59 | | REQUEST For Clerk's entry of default by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence . (bi,) |
| Wednesday, January 07, 2026 | ||
| 60 | | AFFIDAVIT of Joe Louis Lawrence . (bi,) |
| 58 | | NOTICE of Motion by Joe Louis Lawrence for presentment of motion for default judgment57 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/7/2026 at 11:00 AM. . (bi,) |
| 57 | | MOTION by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence for default judgment . (bi,) |
| Att: 1 Text of Proposed Order | ||
| Tuesday, January 06, 2026 | ||
| 55 | | ANSWER to Complaint Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC's Answer and Affirmative Defenses by Verizon Communications Inc.(Kelly, Matthew) |
| 54 | | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Defendant's motion for leave to file its answer52 and directs Verizon to file its answer [52-1] as a separate docket entry. The parties shall file a joint status report by 1/28/26, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial Status Conferences. Mailed notice. (evw, ) |
| Monday, January 05, 2026 | ||
| 56 | | MOTION by Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence for summary judgment pursuant to federal rules of civil procedure w/affidavit & objecting any requests for extension of time. (Exhibits) (rc, ) |
| Friday, January 02, 2026 | ||
| 53 | | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Verizon Communications Inc. Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC's Corporate Disclosures (Kelly, Matthew) |
| 52 | | MOTION by Defendant Verizon Communications Inc. for leave to file Verizon Wireless Service, LLC's Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time (Kelly, Matthew) |
| Att: 1 Exhibit Exhibit A (Verizon's Proposed Answer) | ||
| 51 | | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Verizon Communications Inc. by Matthew Douglas Kelly Attorney Appearance for Verizon Wireless Services, LLC (incorrectly named as Verizon Communications, Inc.) (Kelly, Matthew) |
No comments:
Post a Comment