HERE IS THE NOTICE OF APPEAL THAT WAS FILED DEC 26, 2024, BECAUSE THE FEDERAL COURT WAS CLOSED DEC 24, 2024.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE COURT FILES SO THAT THE JUDGES IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT WILL NOT SEE HOW THE DEMOCRATS CONTROL THE JUDICIARY AND CERTAIN CLERKS IN COOK COUNTY AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT PREVENTING GOOD JUDGES FROM MAKING A DIFFERENCE BRINGING JUSTICE TO THE INNOCENT.
RACISM AND CORRUPTION IS SYNONYMOUS WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND CERTAIN REPUBLICANS ALL OF THEM ARE FEATURED IN THIS APPEAL, SO A MYSTERIOUS COURT ORDER FROM THE COURT APPEALS WAS PRESENTED FINING THE JOHNSON SISTERS $1000 FOR FILING A FRIVOLOUS APPEAL, CLAIMING THEY HAD NO JURISDICTION.
THE AUGUST 30, 2021, COURT ORDER RE CASE 21-2264, JUDGE FEINERMAN OVERTLY VIOLATED EVERY CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE RE THIS CASE IN THE US CONSTITUTION DESPITE FILING MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY HIM, HE DENIED THE MOTIONS HIMSELF AND NEVER DID THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OR COURT OF APPEALS INTERVENE.
THE JOHNSON SISTERS PAID THE $605.00 FOR THE DOCKETING OF THE APPEAL TUESDAY JAN 7, 2025, NEVER DID A CLERK MENTION A COURT ORDER SANCTIONING THEM FOR A $1000.00
US BANK HAD A MEMBER FROM ALTISOURCE TO EMAIL THE JOHNSON SISTERS SEEKING TO REMOVE 61 YEARS OF THEIR POSSESSIONS FROM THEIR HOME, SO A CLERK ALLEGEDLY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE AND REMOVED THE NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE RECORD WITH A COURT ORDER NOT SIGNED FROM ANY JUDGE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS.
AS OF LATE YESTERDAY, THE RANK-AND-FILE ADMINISTRATORS IN THE CLERKS OFFICE INCLUDING THE MANAGER JIM OF THE COURT OF APPEALS HAVE TO PRESENT THE COURT DOCUMENTS AND RECEIPT SHOWING THAT NOT ONLY WAS THE APPEAL FILED TIMELY BUT THE UNJUST SANCTION OF $1000 HAS BEEN PAID.
IT HAS BEEN SAID THAT NOW A JUDGE HAVE TO LIFT THE SANCTION, BUT THE DEMOCRATS DON'T WANT NO JUDGE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TO SEE WHAT APRIL PERRY DID AND HOW SO MANY DEMOCRATS ARE STEALING SENIOR CITIZENS HOMES IN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES AS EVERYONE IN RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY IS REMAINING QUIET BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR AND THEM BEING SENIOR CITIZENS.
I NEED EVERYONE TO RETWEET THIS GETTING THESE WOMEN BACK INTO THEIR HOME PLEASE. THANK YOU #1LOVEALL
Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 9:04 AM
Professor Ken:I hope you and your wife had a better holiday than the Johnson sisters did as well as so many other elderly senior citizens and their families victimized by Apartheid Racial Injustices in this state.As, I digress on Monday Dec 23, the Johnson sisters received a phone call from their neighbors of criminals in their home (that's exactly who they were) so they immediately called the Police and on two occasions sets of 4 officers or units were dispatched and the second group of four filled out a non-criminal report because US bank informed them on the phone, they had a court order of them being evicted and US Bank had men in their home going through the fucking refrigerator taking food out of their freezer throwing it away.It was explained to the Police the case was in Federal Court, and this is an illegal eviction and that, they were trying to get a judge to listen.So, as a former High School Disciplinarian and Business Instructor for the Chicago Public Schools, I am going to give a vivid illustration of the TRUTH of a corrupt dirty judge and until the FBI, Internal Affairs and a proper investigation is had involving the Sheriffs involved, I am not going to comment on their involvement in this matter only because of my personal relationship, I have had with so many of them and being a former employee so it is definitely a conflict of interest.For years the Cook County Sheriff's been like bodyguards to me in the midst of going before racist Ku Klux Klan acting judges every last one of them, I have had the experience of dealing with showed me respect, compassion and protected me even when judge Bartkowicz wanted me REMANDED TO COOK COUNTY JAIL where a man was hung but the Sheriff's took me home and said they were ordered to protect me, they encouraged me to keep writing and reminded me of greater men before me, Dr Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela and Malcolm X who were locked or sent to prison and look at the contributions they have made these were words from Caucasian Brothers.The court order was handed to the Deputies in an ILLEGAL capacity because the judge handed to the law firm who instructed him what to do never had the order filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court within 2-3 business days it was 32 days later before it made it to the database only because on Christmas Eve the Manager emailed the judges Clerk because I provided them a copy of the blank court order and they had the Sheriffs Affidavit in the database and assured me they were going to get a court order.This court order should not be in the database under no circumstances and needs to be removed and reported to the proper authorities because this order was created from the email that Milica Bilic an attorney told him to sign, they never filed any Appearances but communicated to him via emails and his dumb ass did exactly what they instructed him to do and it was not a court day but a day for his Massa doing what he is told as a "FIGUREHEAD" wearing a judges robe as a Halloween costume, his only purpose on the bench is to help racist bank attorneys steal the homes of the elderly and use his ethnicity to violate the Civil Rights of Colored and Black people.The court order corroborates the EVICTION was not only illegal, but the order is VOID/ A NULLITY look at it, it says law division and the law firm's attorney number 42297 in the upper left-hand corner demonstrating their alleged ownership of this judge and in how they instructed him to rule, the other part is that there was no court date when the judge created the fabrication of the back dated order, the order was only done to illegally give the Sheriff's unlawful authority to evict the valid homeowners.THE REAL COURT ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EVICTION SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN DESTROYED because there is nothing in the data system from any attorney being filed seeking an eviction, they thought the senior citizens were going to be emotionally distraught and breakdown and give up thinking US Bank was going to be victorious not with all of these law enforcement agencies involved.Because the Cook County Judiciary is allegedly controlled by the Ku Klux Klan and alleged Homosexuals as "Untouchable" "Private Citizens" are of the mindset that nobody especially the FBI is smart enough to competently figure out they are capable of making assess out of anyone in the law arena and do whatever the fuck they desire.These sorry ass people are more concerned on whose name goes on the bathroom and what man can join any woman's sport to beat her up and upholding the rights violent illegal immigrants and not the Civil Rights of the elderly or any senior citizens and the suppression of Civil Rights of Heterosexuals.Now the Deputies have to file affidavits to the proper authorities telling the "TRUTH" on what document did they receive authorizing them to EVICT the senior citizens from their home?The Democratic Party in Illinois is full of Cowards and Bullies in titled positions who are either unqualified, racist, appointed or simply need somebody to tell them what to do as in the case of Derico, this place is Chicago, Illinois version of DJANGO UNCHAINED, where judge Derico is STEPHEN, he will do anything for Massa US Bank.Where are the real men and women at it seems like our government is in the hands of Babylon, (Sodom & Gomorrah) tyranny and chaos Black or Colored Men are easily broken, bucking them as the slave Master did during that era is very easy nowadays so many have no spine, you have to have a deep hate for your mother and any female and most importantly any woman of senior citizen status to 1.) Allegedly Pay a judge to evict them in the winter and in the holidays, 2.) Take an alleged bribe from any bank official to go along with this shit, 3.) Finally, thinking they are deluded into believing nobody is intelligent enough to see right through their wrongs!It seems like the majority of people caught up in this case and the Bogus Paternity case 88 D 079012 internally hate who they are skin color, sexuality etc. to the point, they are using their positions to try and break or destroy a senior citizen, Colored or Black person and any Heterosexual so as to make them feel powerful because none of them have the love for God or themselves.What are your thoughts Professor Ken?
Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 3:09 PMDear Joe,During the 1/2 century I've practiced law I've note a bunch of truisms. The most unpleasant was the fact that there is certain verbiage, that while accurate and true in many instances turns off the "establishment."After more than 1/2 a century in the practice of law and even having under my belt a bit of fame, pointing out the fact corruption in the Courts was more than common=place got the IARDC's panties all in a bunch and a little vendetta directed at me.My reaction was to "fight back" and while I've been ineffective I've not given up in my quest to make the words of Article 1 section 12 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 have meaning. So far I've been very unsuccessful The outrageously wrongful suspension of JoAnne Denison and Lanre Amu still are ignored. The FINACIAL ELDER ABUSE directed at senior citizens promulgated right out of the Probate Division of the Circuit Court continues unabated and thumbs its nose at not only the statutes designed to protect the elderly but basic concepts of Justice inherent in our tradition.Racism by those on the approved list is not less wrongful than that initiated by that of the KKK, the Nazis etc. However, the distinction is obvious and very frustrating. The double standard is alive and well - and unfortunately is here to stay. Amu - was suspended from the practice of law because of the color of his skin, ditto for others who lack clout.When I representing a leader of the Chinese community, I was called up to address the fact that Customs had their panties in a bunch concerning some food stuff that was being imported from China in connection with a Feasible -(It was a birds nest for bird's nest soup). I agreed to the changing to name on the package and having the package delivered to me to obtain its entry and delivery. Our government thought changing the label to canine was humorous.The foregoing not withstanding I realize that you all are going the "short stick!" I also realize that the racial discrimination that you are experience is the type that we in polite society do not talk about and claim loudly is a figment of imagination; however, it is real and it does exist whether or not our society and in particular our government is welling to recognize the same.Wo what do we do about it?Like in the predatory guardianship cases this is a situation that is not spoken of our thought about in civilized society. The powers that be just will not hear of it. Benign neglect is the best you can hope for - UNTIL *****.18 USCA 4 demands that we report to the law enforcement authorities serious violations of the law. I've - to be compliance with section 4 - have added a couple of other addressees. The adjectives contained in the e-mail help express your frustration, but they do not in my opinion assist the plea for help. (The do however tell the story in a direct manner but on the other hand they provide an excuse for government doing nothing in this horrible situation - they write us off as nuts!)I wish I could help you find a lawyer, but, I've unsuccessful in the Sallas case, the Campasano case et al - even the offering of triple damages, a reduced requirement of proof, attorney fees et al is not sufficient to get the legal profession to STAND UP AND BE COUNTED.Best Wishes for the Holiday season -- I wish we could celebrate the courage of the legal profession in fighting for actual racial justice, the rights of the elderly, or requiring government to just do its job and ending the assault on the most vulnerable Americans.Ken Ditkowsky
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN
DIVISION
|
U.S.
BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES
TRUST 2006-NC3; UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET
SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, AKA “MERS”
MONZELLA
Y. JOHNSON
Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
______________________ Hon
April Perry Magistrate Judge Civil
Action No. 24
cv- 12195 |
EMERGENCY
NOTICE OF APPEAL
REQUESTING RULE TO SHOW CAUSE
REMANDING ALL PARTIES COMPLICIT IN MORTGAGE FRAUD & DOMESTIC TERRORISM IN
THE COURTS NO DEMOCRATIC JUDGE IN ILLINOIS WILL EVER RULE IN FAVOR OF THE
DEFENDANTS ALONG WITH CERTAIN REPUBLICANS
To: See the Certificate of Service of Parties
Said case
demonstrates within the parameter of the laws how the Illinois legal system is
under siege, as stated in earlier affidavits, the Ku Klux Klan, pursuant to the
act of 1871 Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) Remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats
belong or can belong to these societies”)
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on December 24, 2024, A Notice of Appeal and
Jurisdictional Statement has been filed before the Northern District of
Illinois .
Defendant
is Appealing the December 13, and 23, 2024 court ruling against the manifest
weight of the evidence unopposed by the Plaintiffs.
Respectfully Submitted
______________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago, IL. 60615
Dated
December 24, 2024
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN
DIVISION
|
U.S. BANK N.A. AS
TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3;
UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS,
INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, AKA
“MERS”
MONZELLA Y. JOHNSON
Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
______________________ Hon April Perry Magistrate
Judge Civil Action No. 24 cv- 12195 |
Jurisdictional
Statement
Order entered: Dec 13, 2024, Dec 23, 2024
Notice of Appeal filed: December 24, 2024
1.) The Court April Perry stated, “Defendant
is attempting to remove PENDING state court case 2008 CH 33616 to federal
court” How is it the case was DISMISSED AND AFFIRMED by the Appellate Court
Vacated 16 years ago is still pending your Honor?
Statutes: Democratic Judges violating
United States Supreme Court Rulings Enforcing “Jim Crow Laws” Mortgage Fraud,
Violations of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, “Trespassing upon the Laws” “No
Jurisdiction on case, Order being Void a “Nullity” Obstruction of Justice ”
Committing Fraud, Engaging in Treason Like Offenses, Judges Committing Perjury,
Judges aiding and abetting in a Criminal Conspiracy, Judge committing Unequal
Protection of the Laws Violations, Judge acting outside of the Immunity
provisions of his Oath, as “Private Citizens” outlawed by the United States Supreme
Court as they used their robes and
jurisdiction to aid and assist Terrorist Democratic Judges and Public Officials
in covering-up Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection
of the Laws, Racial Hate Crimes, Slander and Defamation of Character, Civil
Rights Violations, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal
Corruption Conspiracies by Democrats, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless
Violations, Violation of Canon Ethics : A
judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. Canon
2: A
judge
shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's
activities. Canon 3: A
judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.
The State of Illinois Appellate Court Affirmed the Vacating
the Judgment of Foreclosure Dec 30, 2011 and Presiding Judge issued a nine-page
Memorandum Opinion and Order Vacating the Sale and Judgment of Foreclosure,
June 3, 2010.
Defendant is appealing to the Court
of Appeals, for
a Reversal Sanctions and Remand with instructions notifying Federal authorities
based on the foregoing stated above:
Defendant has Due-Diligently been fighting to
keep their home from unlawfully being stolen from them in the disguise as
foreclosure before the Supreme Court of Illinois, District Court and now before
the Court of Appeals for over 16 years racist political judges have “Trespassed upon the Laws” entering Orders
that are “VOID” a “NULLITY” pursuant to the laws of the United States Supreme
Court as judges used their robes and unlawful authority to maintain a
Democratic “Lynching” of the laws on the Appellants as senior citizens in that
every Black and Brown person in the Democratic Party kept their mouths shut
because they are powerless over Anglo Saxon men in the Democratic Party and
they are only figureheads.
Defendant is appealing
to the Court of Appeals, because Anglo Saxon
judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored, the fact Defendants
are victims of an “Organized Criminal
Conspiracy” perpetrated by Democratic judges acting as “Private Citizens”
controlling the Criminal Enterprise in all of the courts controlled by
Democrats, in that Judge April Perry entered a “FRAUDULENT” admission in the
court order to obstruct and corroborate her role as an alleged “White
Supremacist stating that Defendant was served in 2008, nowhere in the record is
there any mentioning of this nor did the Plaintiffs oppose the veracity of all
pleadings accompanied with affidavits.
Judge Perry closed
her eyes to all of the criminal acts of Democratic Judges violating Section
1983 of the Civil Rights Act of the Defendant’s as she became the “Defacto”
attorney for US Bank condoning all Terrorist Treason offenses accompanied by an
affidavit unimpeached by every attorney supporting the Plaintiff by violating
the Civil Rights of the Defendants showing her hate and contemptuousness
demeanor at the Senior Citizens of African American descent
“Grounds warranting a motion to
reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new
evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or
prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM
Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth
Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value,
unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3
Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).
A-
That
Judge Perry had knowledge affidavits of Plaintiff US Bank being served via
Registered Agent through electronic delivery, Nov. 26, 2024 on the Notice of
Removal from State Court, Judge ignored the fact, Plaintiffs never responded in
14 days entered an ORDER, Deemed a Nullity The
Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial
Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as
mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful
misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a
pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline. Cannon v. Commission on Judicial
Qualifications, 14
B-
That
Plaintiff filed an Emergency Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedures w/ Affidavit Dec 16, 2024. Judge Perry became a
“Private Citizen” (after Plaintiffs admitted to all of the Pleadings of Judges
colluding with them in said “Criminal Organized Conspiracy”) categorically
DENIED the Motion, Dec 13, 2024 Court
Order et al.
C-
That
Defendant filed an Emergency Motion for Reconsideration due to Fraud &
Misrepresentations to the court Vacate all Judgments due to Democratic Judges
entering orders being “VOID” A “NULLITY” case being “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES
“TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TRESON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE
CITIZENS”, Judge April Perry demonstrated and corroborated her Racist Bias
animus hatred at the Senior Citizens homeless to the heinous criminal acts of
them being unlawfully evicted, DENIED said Motion, (Denied Dec 23, 2024)
D- That April Perry corroborated her involvement in
this Criminal Enterprise by using her robe to facilitate her authority in
denying any and all claims Defendant put before her court showing the FBI and
this Honorable Court her depraved indifference to the United States
Constitution and people of Color now that she is an untouchable federal judge.
E-
That
Judge April Perry is demonstrating unequivocally using her robe and
jurisdiction to racially OPPRESS, LYNCH INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR, AS IF THEY
WERE ROPES, DOGS OR WATERHOSES BY APPLYING UNLAWFUL APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS IN
AN TYRANNICAL TERRORIST MANNER, not fearing any retributions because of her
fraternal brethren in the Seventh Circuit, allegedly will DENY ANY DOCUMENT Pro
Se’s or individuals of color who presents valid legal claims before that
circuit they will be SYSTEMATICALLY DISMISSED.
F-
That
Defendant and other innocent Litigants of color cases have appeared before JUDGES ALLEGEDLY
DESCRIBED AS MEMBERS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, NAZI FRATERNAL ORDER OR WHITE
NATIONALIST MEMBERS who have systematically denied all of their claims as outlined
in the aforementioned history of cases.
G-
That former States Attorney Kim Foxx, Illinois Attorney General,
Kwame Raoul, and Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Murphy, former Illinois Attorney
General, Lisa Madigan, have admitted via
Summary Judgment and Default judgment (filed Feb. 2024) as Democratic judges
incite hateful rulings not in accordance to any Civil Rights laws “the fact
Negroes in the Democratic Party have no authority over Racist Anglo- Saxons”
Pages 7-8 of the Affidavit, Summary Judgment have been admitted to via Local
Rule 56.1
H-
“Any judge who does not comply
with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that
Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.
The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not
three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the
Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of
the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not
fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888)
he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of
treason.”
I-
That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require
plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud
on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is
reasonable. Plaintiff complied with said rule but the court was a law unto
himself.
J- Posner:
ABA Journal (September 11, 2017) Most
judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire
because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se
litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about the
treatment of such litigants.
A-
“The basic thing
is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of
a federal judge,” Posner said.
In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro
se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges,
he noted.
Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake
by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of
judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program.
“But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to
give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.
Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming
book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the
court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he
said.
A-
US Bank has admitted to a plethora of Criminal
Civil Rights violations along with the names of every judge in Illinois who
have colluded with them helping them steal colored persons homes via every
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIDAVITS, COURT TRANSCRIPTS, ORAL TESTIMONY ETC.
News about Mayor Lightfoot Calling Racism A
Public Health Crisis June 17, 2021
bing.com/news
“PRIOR HISTORY OF SYSTEMIC
RACIAL HATE CRIMES OF JUDGES OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE UPHOLDING “ORGANIZED
CRIMINAL TERRORIST ACTS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGES WHEN SAID DEFENDANTS WERE BEFORE
THE COURTS AS PRO SE LITIGANTS”
1.) That pursuant to Defendant’s Motion for
Reconsideration filed November 4, 2016 judge Yeghiayan became complicit in an “Organized
Conspiracy” by “Trespassing upon the Laws” using his robe and
judicial authority to cover-up the “Treason Offenses” engaged upon by
other Democratic judges and operatives in the Terrorist Criminal Enterprise in
Cook County.
2.) That judge Yeghiayan had his law
clerk to call the Defendant’s on Oct. 24, 2016 at 9:00am telling them to be in
court Nov. 3, 2016 at 9:00am.
3.) That Defendant’s appeared in court
pursuant to the judge’s directive and learned he had dismissed the case Nov. 2,
2016 remanding the matter back to the Criminal Enterprise of Cook County.
TO FURTHER AMPLIFY DEMOCRATIC
JUDGE YEGHIAYAN’S participation in what is now
described as a Hate Crime corroborating his role in an “Organized Criminal
Conspiracy” aiding and assisting the Plaintiff’s in trying to steal their
home
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and
42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or
not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135
Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
A-
That the court
became
a law unto
themselves
denied
said
motion
and
became “Private Citizens” not having any jurisdiction over the Defendant making
all Orders a “Nullity”.
B-
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining
party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the
judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the
misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson,
882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
C-
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
The request for
a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the
Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b)
(1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:
Rule 26 is new; it implements the Breyer Committee’s
recommended use of transfers. Breyer
Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint
proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such
transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint
where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where
the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public
confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a
result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council
appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of
the home court of appeals et al.
That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook
County judges violating the RICO ACT,
the 7th Cir. Held that
the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by
Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther
Merritt Swygert;
PETITION FOR REVIEW & PETITION TO TRANSFER
THIS CASE TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL
To the Honorable Judicial
Conference Committee et al. of the United States:
Complainant a United States Citizen,
Monzella Y. Johnson, hereby respectfully represents as Pro Se shows this
Judicial Conference Committee with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the
noted reasons why this matter should be reviewed and Transferred to another
Judicial Council within the United States.
Now comes Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144,
to show that Judge April Perry, and a plethora of other Democratic judges has
Trespassed upon the Laws in an arrogant “Contemptuous manner” the Seventh
Circuit, Judicial Council has ignored all sufficient motions with affidavits,
stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction; motions corroborating
judicial corruption “fraud” “perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights
Acts” put before the courts that the District Court ignored and holding Racism
Corruption in the courts.
STATUTES: Trespassers of the Laws, Treason, hereto attached, Group Ex. A, Summary Judgment (filed
Dec. 4, 2023) and Default Judgment (filed detailing just how said judges engaging in
acts of Treason likened to “Weapons of Mass Destruction” destroying
innocent lives like the Defendant;
Rule
26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another
judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be
appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are
multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are
highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the
process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the
complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a
complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of
appeals et al.
Respectfully Submitted
Monzella Y. Johnson
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com
Civil
Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That
all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United
States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any
previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same
right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce
contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease,
sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit
of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and
penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or
custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14
Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
In the
20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on
constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the
court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court
in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in
interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce
clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities
were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy
v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This
landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart
v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs
v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County
School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington,
D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe).
These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State
Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP
v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960),
slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As the color line itself solidified at the
turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed on black people clear tactical
disadvantages: restricted economic possibilities, narrow educational
opportunities, inadequate housing options, high rates of death and disablement,
persistent unemployment, and unrelenting poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow
represented the race problem described by Gunnar Myrdal (1898–1987) in his 1944 treatise The
American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that created the race quandary; whites constructed
the obstacles African Americans confronted, while also blaming them for their
conditions, denying them access to the resources of problem solving, and daring
them—under threat of
violence—to
complain, protest, or advance.
Finally, protests or challenges to Jim Crow
often proved futile, given law enforcement’s complicity in the structure. From emancipation to the turn of the
century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a paramilitary arm of the Democratic
Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders, red shirts, and other white
terrorists intimidated African Americans with personal attacks, school
burnings, and lynchings. African Americans rarely served as policemen,
sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the 1950s and 1960s, the
connections between municipal and state governments, law enforcement, and
racial violence were well known by officials and citizens alike. White officers
were known to harass black people, disrupt black neighborhoods, and assault
black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied satisfactory counsel, and
serving harsh sentences, African Americans were further disadvantaged in the
courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel, nor could they serve on
juries. When black lawyers could appear in the courtroom to argue cases, white
judges and juries rarely listened. All-white juries decided against black
defendants, even in the most obvious cases of innocence, but rarely convicted
white defendants, despite evidence of guilt. African Americans—including the innocent—suffered the harsher punishments of
extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage. Even women could be placed
on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks across the South.
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin,
Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed
corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is
apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the most
Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper,
February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The
two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion….and the City
Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no
other State can match us.”
Turner
24 F.
Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) the “equal benefit” clause is cited in
what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The
plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her
former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an
apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the
same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being
transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted
a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in
fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of
the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
2.) A judge’s disrespect for
the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined
under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated
witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A
the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds
disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand
respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same
laws”)
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes,
416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state
officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal
Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative
character and is subjected in his person to the consequences
of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
[Emphasis supplied in original].
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are
regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar
to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
I affirm the
above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted
_________________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
Wherefore the Foregoing
Reasons,
Appellant Prays for the
following relief:
1.) Appellant requests that
another Honorable Court of Appeals, Judicial Circuit accept Jurisdiction of
this matter and Invoke authority Instanter and reassign this matter accordingly
and or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights said attorneys and judges
are complicit in, Order a Rule to Show
Cause for Remands and Indictments on all parties associated in said Treason
Offenses;
2.) Impose Sanctions/Remands against and all
parties for Contempt of the United States Constitution for their crimes against
the Defendant/Government
3.) Issue an Injunction on U
S Bank and all judges presiding in the matter trying to steal Defendant’s home
in the unlawful application of Foreclosure and relied on judges acting outside
their jurisdiction committing treason offenses;
4.) Issue an Order Nullifying
Voiding all orders and Chief Judge in the Court of Appeals absent a signature,
due to “Fraud” “Treason” Trespassing upon the Laws” and other Civil Rights
Violations;
5.) An order issuing a Moratorium on all Foreclosures in Cook
County Circuit courts, Appellate Court or Supreme Court of Illinois
where Wells Fargo and U. S. Bank are a party to foreclosures where “Fraud” and
treason is apparent and not being properly investigated in the State of
Illinois;
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing
Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules
breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot
demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very
same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in
Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”,
he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said,
“If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It
invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”
The Chicago Daily
Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political
Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states,
“Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real
breeding ground”.
That Chicago
is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The
two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion….and the City
Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no
other State can match us.”
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I Monzella Y. Johnson
certify that on Dec. 24, 2024 I have caused proper service to be had on the
Plaintiff and noted parties in the Certificate of Service via electronic/email delivery.
Attorney General Cook County States Attorney
Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov Eilene O’Neil Burke
555 West Monroe Suite 1300 statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
50 West
Washington, Suite 702 email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Chg. IL 60601
Dir. FBI,
Hon Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City
Hall 7th floor
Chicago,
IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
President/CEO Rick Aneshansel
US Bank Natl. Assoc. rick.aneshansel@usbank.com
Registered
Agent: Grace A. Gorka US Bank Natl.
Assoc.
190 S. LaSalle,
grace.gorka@usbank.com
ggorka@usbank.com
Chg. IL 60603
JSC_General@atgf.com Pamela Murphy-Boylan President CEO of the
(TJSC)
RPerdew@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
simon.feng@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
pmal@potestivolaw.com Potestivo Law Firm
chicagodocket@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
Cook County Eviction Superintendent Colin.Luce@ccsheriff.org
CCSO Evictions CCSO.evictions@ccsheriff.org
ccc.chancerycalendar12@cookcountyil.gov Presiding Judge S. H. Hall
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal
bthompson@potestivolaw.com
223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite
610
Chicago, IL. 60606
Cook County Clerk, Mariyana Spyropoulos
CCCWebsite@cookcountycourt.com
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Dec. 24, 2024 A Notice of Appeal and
Jurisdictional Statement has been filed in the Northern District of Illinois
Federal Court.
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment