ATTENTION MEDIA/REPORTER WILLIAM J. KELLY COOK COUNTY NOR STATE JUDGES HONORS ANY LAWS RELATING TO CIVIL RIGHTS OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
BECAUSE STEVE FANADY IS GREEK HE IS BEING TREATED AS A BLACK OR BROWN MAN AND IS A NORM IN HOW THE COURTS VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THESE MEN OR WOMEN EVERYDAY WHO CAN NOT AFFORD LEGAL REPRESENTATION ON WHEN THEY ARE BEING RELEASED FROM JAIL AFTER SPENDING 20, 30 OR 40 YEARS IN PRISON FOR SHIT THEY NEVER DID IS WHEN LAWYERS COME OUT OF THE WOOD WORKS.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
OR THE COOK COUNTY COURTS DO NOT HONOR THE 14TH
AMENDMENT OR ANY ILLINOIS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ONLY THE LAWS OF THEIR
FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION VIA SEXUALITY, SKIN COLOR ETC.
NOT ONE
DEMOCRATIC JUDGE WHO TOOK PART IN THESE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES REALIZE THEY CAN
BE REMOVED FROM THEIR POSITIONS—REPORTER WILLIAM J. KELLY, BECAUSE STEVE
FANADY IS GREEK THE POLITICAL MACHINE DEMOCRATS ARE NOT PARTICULARILY FOND OF
HIM OR HIS KIND BECAUSE HE IS NOT SUBMISSIVE, INFERIOR OR OF THEIR SEXUAL OR
RACIST FRATERNITY. I AM WILLING TO WORK WITH HIS ATTORNEY IF HE DOESN’T MIND MY
SKIN COLOR AS A BROWN MAN.
I HAVE
HELPED A MAN WHO HAD 4 OR 5 ATTORNEYS TO SEEK CUSTODY OF HIS DAUGHTER HE LOST
HIS VEHICLES AND JOB OF $30.00 AN HOUR PAYING 4 OR 5 ATTORNEYS WHO WAS NOT ABLE
TO GET HIM CUSTODY WITH HIS DAUGHTER, HE HAD ONE OF THE MOST RACIST HISPANICS
ON THE 3OTH FLOOR WHERE FORTI IS.
I GOT HIM
WITH HIS DAUGHTER AND THE SUPREME COURT DENIED GETTING INVOLVED WITH HIS CASE.
HE will never
receive justice in Cook County or Illinois, they are treating him as if he is a
Black or Brown Man-----------THERE IS NOT DEMOCRATIC JUDGE IN ILLINOIS
KNOWLEDGEABLE OF ANY OF THESE LAWS:
1.) The Court April Perry
stated, “Moreover, the state case is a mortgage foreclosure/eviction action,
and presents no basis for federal jurisdiction” In that, this is the norm
in Cook County and State Courts in how cases are “FIXED” Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218,
220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985)
(Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt
power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court
Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be
characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct
constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the
administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute).
Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which
warrant discipline. Cannon v.
Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 14
The first
time an Appearance was filed was in September 2024—NO DEMOCRATIC JUDGE IN COOK
COUNTY OR ILLINOIS HONORS THE 14TH AMENDMENT OR ILLINOIS RULES OF
CIVIL PROCEDURES---THEY ONLY RULE ACCORDING TO RACIST, FRATERNAL SEXIST HATEFUL
GUIDELINES—STILL ENFORCING JIM CROW LAWS OUTLAWED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT.
The
following is a case where a Black Man was remanded and incarcerated not for any
criminal offense but for not taking a Genetic Test.
I have never
had a DNA test on the 88 D 079012 case even though a Default was entered and
never VACATED May 18, 1988 Cook County Judges still violated my Civil Rights
had me REMANDED forced off my Cook County Sheriffs Position, Illegally forced
off my CTA Position as Ronald Bartkowicz and Assistant States Attorneys trumped
up charges backdated Police Officer Francoise Hightower’s daughter Tycee Hightower’s
age making her a minor from 2002-2007
Pursuant to
Fed Rule 8 and 9 see the attached Emails Particularizing the Terrorist Acts of
Fraud by “Private Citizens” impersonating law abiding judges
I AM IN KANGAROO COURT a Racist judge
allegedly told the African Clerks to not put me on her calendar and to put me
or Forti’s calendar because he would know what to do, this judge never should
have been in a robe or licensed to practice law, this conversation of what took
place Dec 13, 2024 is a clear example of egregious violations of Title
V11
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981)
Racial Discrimination, Racial Retaliation,
Racial Hatred, Racial
Oppression, Civil
Rights Violations, Unequal Applications of the Laws, and Disparate Treatment on the basis of race, color,
sexuality or national origin and age (42 U.S.C. 1981).
This court has .Jurisdiction
over the statutory violations
alleged as conferred as follows:
over Title V11 claims by
U.S.C. {1331, 28 U.S.C.
{1343 (a) 3 and
42 U.S.C. {2000e-5
(F) (3); over 42 U.S.C. {1981 and {1983 by 42 U.S.C. {1988; over the A.D.E.A. by 42 U.S.C. {12117}.
I AM A
HETEROSEXUAL MAN OF COLOR AND THE LEGAL JUDICIARY IS OF THE OPPOSITE AND RACIST
BECAUSE SO MANY PEOPLE ARE IN THE CLOSET LIVING ALLEGED DOUBLE LIVES WITH WIVES
NOBODY WHO IS A DEMOCRAT IS GOING TO SAY SHIT TO ANOTHER JUDGE OUT OF FEAR—THE SHIT
HAPPENING TO P. DIDDY WILL HAPPEN TO THEM.
COOK COUNTY
SHERIFF’S TOLD ME THIS YEARS AGO, BUT I NEVER PAID IT ANY ATTENTION BUT THEY
ARE RUNNING THE CITY AND COURTS AS A FRATERNITY OR SORORITY, ALLEGED BLOW JOBS
OR SEXUAL FAVORS GOES A LONG WAY DEPENDING ON WHO IS DOING OR RECIVING WHO!
The
Following is a Court Hearing continued from Dec 9 to Friday Dec 13 where, I was
supposed to have been before Judge Romanek. Judge Forti have no idea that Judge
Romanek’s Court Order was a Nullity/Void but Democratic judges don’t understand
legal procedures because as racist Caucasians learning the laws was not
necessary dealing with Black and Brown people or certain foreigners eg Greeks,
Asians etc. whomever they deem inferior to them.
I filed a
Motion to Disqualify Judge Forti’s racist Ass and they pitched the case to
another racist on the 30th floor Romanek.
1. Judge Abbey Romanek: O. K. All right.
Well, I don’t find that to be biased and complicity. I find that to be a
mistake of fact, which can be easily fixed. The States Attorney is here and
they don’t and aren’t aware of this case at all. So I’m not even sure that they
are involved in this case.
2. Joe
Louis Lawrence: But I submitted the court orders showing that the state’s
attorney did,
3. Judge
Romanek: Well ok in fact, well, then that’s just a mistake of fact. And if
that’s the case, then that can be cured. It doesn’t show bias. So your motion
to
4. Assistant
States Attorney Madison Mathis: Your honor, I actually found this case in
one of our databases. It looks like it looks like it had been taken off call
for non-states attorney matter back on
Let’s see here March 27th of 2024.
5. Judge
Romanek: But I see something here from May 20.
She committed Perjury on the bench saying the Assistant
States Attorney is not on the case, Once President Trump is inaugurated he
needs to send in the military because we have a different breed of Domestic
Terrorists running Chicago’s courts.
Clerk: Mr. Lawrence, the Judge told you to come back
at 11, you are a little early.
Joe Louis Lawrence: OK,
Alright.
ASA: What I would do I will ask
you to unmute yourself and I’ll call you all individually to discuss your child support matter. But I do
see I have someone in the county lockup Mr. Lee. Can you please unmute
yourself? Good morning, Sir how are you? I’m OK,
ASA: Well, Mr. Lee, you were here
‘cause you have not submitted to genetic testing. Have you been submitted to
genetic testing there in the detention center phone?
OK, so is there possible to get him to genetic testing
today?
Deputy: I have no idea. OK, so what
I’ll do, what are you in for? Sir? I didn’t know any other case. No. OK, so
what I’ll do, sir,
ASA: I’ll go ahead and release
you on this case only, and I’ll need you to go submit for the genetic testing.
OK, and if you do not test, I’m gonna issue another warrant. OK, so let me give
you your next court date, and I will write this on the order. I’m gonna send
order over to you. OK, so now I’m gonna give you an extra day. Your next court
date will be January 3rd at 11:00 AM. And you’ll be on zoom. Okay.
Now go ahead with your question So you’re gonna send me all that information.
OK, we have to go, have to come. No, she knows. So you’ll get the email, tell
you when it comes back to the zoom, as well as you get an order for your
genetic testing, and you do that as soon as possible. But you do it before the
3rd of next month. So you’re gonna send me somewhere in particular,
and you go down, you go to the Daley center in the basement. That’s where you
take it at. OK, just go along. I don’t have to pay for it? No, I remember last time
they told me I was gonna have to pay. What do they call it? What they. Pay for
this test. OK, the State pays for this test, but you need to take it.
Mr. Lee OK, I’m gonna take it Monday then.
ASA: I’m gonna check if you don’t
take it. I’m gonna issue another warrant for your arrest. Alright. Mr.
Davidson, I’ll send this order over, probably within the next 45 minutes. And
thank you That’s the one I’m done. I’ll send the order to you. Thank you. Thank
you, ma’am. Have a good day. Thank you. You too Alright, ma’am, I’m ready for
you parties now.
States Attorney Yolanda Simmons: I’m gonna call your name, and I’ll be asking
yourselves to give me a number. Where I can reach you at, I have Mr. Lawrence.
Please unmute yourself.
ASA: OH yeah. Good morning. Yes,
you have a state child support case. Yes, ma’am. I have noticed. OK, give me a
phone number.
ASA: I can reach you at 312 965-6455.
OK, go ahead and mute yourself. I’ll give you a call.
Joe Louis Lawrence: Excuse
me, I spoke to Miss Simmons. She said, I have to speak to judge Forti.
Clerk: This is about what’s
supposed to go before the Judge, right?
Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes.
Clerk: OK, yeah. See, it has to go
back before that judge to ask
Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes,
ma’am, OK Yeah,
Joe Louis Lawrence:
Madam Clerk. Could you put me back before Judge Forti please?
Clerk: Well, that has to be done
before the Coordinator, So you would just have to hold on a moment.
Joe Louis Lawrence: OK,
Clerk: thank you.
Clerk: Alright.
Clerk: so you have to go back
before that judge to ask for a change of venue or SOJ.
Joe Louis Lawrence: That
is correct,
Clerk: So You have to go back to
that judge. Which judge was it?
Joe Louis Lawrence: It
was Judge Romanek
Clerk You have to go back before
that judge. You have to file your motion.
Joe Louis Lawrence But I
did, I did all of that. The clerks indicated that Romanek said send the case to
Forti
Clerk No it can’t come to judge
Forti just like that
Joe Louis
Lawrence but that’s why I…
Clerk: So now
listen to me Sir, Listen to me. You have to go before that judge with your
motion. You say you went before Judge Romanek to ask, what did you ask for? Was
it an SOJ substitution of judge?
Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes,
ma’am. Yes, ma’am.
Clerk: OK, so now listen to me. Listen
to me. So Judge Romanek is supposed to send that substitution of judge to our presiding judge, which is Judge Scannicchio.
It has to go to the presiding judge and then they enter it into a lottery
system to sort it out to go to another judge. You just can’t say go to judge Forti.
It was never on Judge Forti’s call.
Joe Louis Lawrence: with
all due the respect. Who am I speaking to please?
Clerk Kimberly Wilson: My
name is Kimberly Wilson. I am the coordinator.
Joe Louis Lawrence: OK,
OK everything you’re saying I’m familiar. With but I can’t do nothing different
if this is where they’re sending me. I sent him a courtesy copy explaining what
was said. So if I'm not supposed to be in front of Judge Forti which I
understand and know this, I just need an order from Forti sending this matter
to Scannicchio. I can’t make nobody put me where I’m supposed to go, now I am
going through Romper Room.
Clerk Kimberly Wilson: I
see and I hear you, Judge Forti can’t do an order Because it was never on his
call. Judge Romanek is supposed to do the order to send it to Judge Scannicchio.
She knows this. She’s supposed to do the order sending it to Judge Scannicchio.
Pretty much judge Forti has nothing to do with it. is what I am trying to tell
you.
Joe Louis Lawrence: But I
understand. But you see where…
Clerk Kimberly Wilson: He can’t do an order because it’s not on his
call and it was not before him. It’s what I’m trying to say. So you have to go
back before Judge Romanek for her to do an order to transfer to substitute the
judge. You want to change? You want to substitute a judge? Is what you want.
Joe Louis Lawrence: When
I did this, I originally filed a motion
to disqualify Judge Forti. The case was sent to Romanek. Romanek did not follow
the procedures. She said that everything I was saying, I was wrong and I filed
the proper motion to recuse her November the 4th when the Clerks
went to put me on her calendar, she informed them that she did not want me on
her calendar and said to send this case to Judge Forti is the reason why I'm
here.
Clerk Kimberly Wilson:
Madam Clerk, Can you look this case up for us and tell me what’s going on? For
some reason I can’t get into the into the odyssey to look this up.
Joe Louis Lawrence: I
mean they are playing games with me now. I wouldn’t be in front of him if I’m
trying to recuse him. Yes,
Madam Clerk: Mr. Lawrence. Do you
know your case number? I don’t have your case number 88 DO79O12. Wait wait one
moment, You said 1988 D.
Joe Louis Lawrence Yes
ma’am.
Madam Clerk: OK go ahead D 079012 If I could get in, cause our system is
acting up.
Clerk Kimberly Wilson: I’m having a problem with the system. It won’t
even let me sign on to the system.
Madam Clerk: I know it’s a mess today. Is it Hightower and
Joseph Lawrence?
Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes
Ma’am, OK, this is not even my child.
Madam Clerk: Ok what are you
trying to find out?
Clerk Kimberly Wilson:
Basically He’s saying that, He’s trying to do a substitution of judge before
the proper judge. Romanek. And for some reason, they told him he had to come to
judge Forti. As far as we know, he's not even saying it. It is on. It is
assigned to his calendar, if that’s, if that means anything.
Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes,
It does
Madam Clerk: it is calendar 61.
OK,
Clerk Kimberly Wilson: OK, so, Mr. Lawrence, you were right. It is on
calendar 61.
Clerk Kimberly Wilson: So Mr.
Lawrence
Judge Forti: So, Mr. Lawrence, you’re clogging the system with all due
respect here. Here’s the issue. Miss Simmons and I are going to address your
motion that you filed for default. That piece of the case is on calendar 61.
But the piece of the matter that deals with Judge Romanek is not on my
calendar. I just sent an email to Judge Scannicchio’s assistant to confirm that,
So only with respect to your motion for default, are we going to deal with this
today? And Miss Simmons, when you’re ready, I’d like to handle the Lawrence matter.
Joe Louis Lawrence: Your
Honor, I filed a motion to disqualify you, so you shouldn’t be handling
anything.
ASA Yolanda Simmons: Your Honor, I
am ready
Judge Forti: Well, who heard that?
as, I understand it. And that’s why I’m asking if there was a motion to
disqualify me. There should be an order indicating whether or not that motion
to disqualify was granted or not. I’m not aware of it being granted.
Joe Louis Lawrence: That
is the motion put before Judge Romanek. That’s the issue right now.
Judge Forti: Well If she denied
it, then it’s done. And you’re back in front of me.
Joe Louis Lawrence:
Judge Scannicchio Never sent the case to you.
Judge Forti: No, that’s not true.
Miss Simmons, all right. Did you get a copy of Mr. Lawrence’s motion for
default?
ASA Yolanda Simmons: Yes,
I did. Now, this is just to refresh myself, Mr. Lawrence. You’re trying to
terminate arrearage because you’re alleging the petitioner is deceased. Is that
correct?
Joe Louis Lawrence: Excuse
me!
ASA Yolanda Simmons: Are you trying to terminate arrearage? Because
you are alleging the petitioner is deceased?
Joe Louis Lawrence: No,
no. I filed the default from a Summary Judgment.
ASA Yolanda Simmons: OK, so I got something from Judge Scannicchio,
because your case was with Judge Scannicchio, correct?
Joe Louis Lawrence: Not that I know of.
Judge Forti: It was on calendar
one at interim basis. Mr. Lawrence is saying that Judge Roman Act denied his
motion and now. After the Fact he wants to disqualify Judge Romanek that’s not
the way it works,
ASA: Yolanda Simmons Right.
Judge Forti: But you’re involved in Simmons because Mister
Lawrence filed a complaint against the assistant state’s attorney and a slew of
other people, He claims that, You have
got notice of this and that is why I want you to be on this because he has
filed a motion for default
Joe Louis Lawrence: Your
Honor, First of all, You’re confusing
the issues with all due respect!
Judge Forti: No I’m not Mr. Lawrence. Please be quiet.
Please be quiet. I want Miss Simmons to look into this.
ASA Yolanda Simmons: So
you’re under what I have. The last order on the most relevant order I have is from
judge Romanek returning the case to
calendar 61. So that’s what I have.
Judge Forti: All right. And she returned it back to me
because the motion to disqualify against me was denied. So you understand that Mr.
Lawrence, you tried to get me disqualified and Judge Romanek said no.
Joe Louis Lawrence: But
she was biased and she didn’t send the
case to Judge Scannicchio, She sent the case directly to you. And I did that.
But that’s O. K. Because it went through calendar one.
Joe Louis Lawrence: No,
it didn’t.
Judge Forti: Yes, it did. You
understand?
Joe Louis Lawrence: Where’s the court order at? There’s no court
order. There’s no court order from Judge Scannicchio sending the case back to you.
Judge Forti: And the reason is the
only. Thing that matters is that judge Scannicchio that Judge Romanek denied the motion to qualify. I mean, yes, to
disqualify
it. Stayed on calendar. What? So that portion of the case is finished. Do you
see an order? Miss Simmons of Judge Romanek denying the motion that?
ASA: Yolanda Simmons: I see that
I have that order right here your Honor.
Judge Forti: Fine. Judgment. And your honor. All right, you
accept that Mr. Lawrence?
Joe Louis Lawrence: No,
I don’t.
Judge Forti: All right, why not?
Joe Louis Lawrence: It’s
because Judge Scannicchio was the one that’s supposed to send the case back to
you. Not Romanek sending the case to you directly.
Judge Forti: It went through
calendar one. It was the only place. The only place, Sir, once Judge Romanak
denied the motion for cause. It had to come back here. Plain and simple. So I.
have the case. And Miss Simmons back to what I said, he has filed a motion for
default against the state.
ASA: Yolanda Simmons: OK, now.
Joe Louis Lawrence: So I am. I’m respectfully objecting to the
state being involved because judged when Eileen Burke was a judge, she was
involved in this matter and denied..
Judge Forti: And at the moment, Sir, Sir, this is falling.
I’m telling you that you have filed a motion against a variety of parties,
including the assistant state’s attorney. You got him. You filed a motion for
default. Isn’t that, right?
Joe Louis Lawrence: That
is correct. And I also filed a motion to go to a different venue
Judge Forti: I am letting him Miss
Simmons know that you filed this motion for default. And I want to know what
Miss Simmons’s position is now.
ASA: At this time, I have received some emails on
this case. From Scannicchio Clerk as well as from our own internal policies on
how we handle with these cases. Your honor. I’m going to have to set this for
brief continuance and get more clarification from my supervised attorney about
how we handle these types of cases given the nature of what Mr. Lawrence has
filed. So what date?
Judge Forti: So what day?
ASA: I want to say this for
January 30th. I’m I’m sorry. January 3rd.
Judge Forti: is that work, Mr.
Lawrence?
Joe Louis Lawrence: It’s
fine.
ASA: Can you come back here at
noon?
Joe Louis Lawrence: Back to zoom?
ASA: Yes.
Joe Yes
Judge Forti: And the issue is
where it where you’re get your getting Miss Simmons is seeking the continuance
with respect to the fact that you re noticed your motion for default
Joe Louis Lawrence: And for the Cook County
Judiciary to be recused as well.
Judge Forti: That I cannot do.
Joe Louis Lawrence: And
we still have Maritza Martinez motion that have not been addressed that I paid
to $75 for
Judge Forti: You need to go back to
Miss Judge Martinez I can only handle because I have not recused myself and
your effort to get me recused by virtue of the SOJ was denied. So I am. Keeping
this case until at least we see what Miss Simmons says on the motion for
default anything relating to Judge Romanek or Judge Martinez you have to raise
in those courtrooms all right. So Miss Simmons, what do you have Mr. Lawrence’s
contact information?
ASA: I did get a phone number from
Mr. Lawrence Let me see if I still have
your number at 312-965-6455.
Joe Louis Lawrence: That
is correct.
ASA: All right, Mr. Lawrence, I
have you.
Judge Forti: All right. Thank you,
Mr. Lawrence. All right, Miss Simmons, what other matters do we have?
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
No comments:
Post a Comment