Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Sunday, July 7, 2024

 

This is why nobody respects Blacks in authority because so many don't have respect for themselves.

Most of the Blacks in the Democratic Party seems to think and act in a way as long as their crimes are on people of Color or their own ethnicity the Caucasians, they are beholding to will save them from prosecution or any type of admonishments.

There is not one Black Person in this case especially a Black Man who had the authority to tell the Caucasians involved they were wrong but so many went along with all of these egregious acts trying to protect their Mr. Charlie from ever being exposed.

Many wonder where is the Black men are and why haven't so many come forward to denounce the senseless violence in their communities or babies being gunned down?

People need to realize that most men in the Democratic Party need a Caucasian to direct or tell them how they are to speak or conduct themselves if they expect to keep their appointments because most of these individuals are promoted based upon their abilities destroying their own ethnic groups.

You will NEVER find a Caucasian destroying their own ethnic groups as illustrated in this case to please or help anybody Black or Latino to seek any appointments or any type of favors from them but look at what so many have done to help out the racist caught up in this mess. 

 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE                                                              )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Iris Y. Chivira                     

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 41 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )        

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-12

 

MOTION TO RECUSE THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS MAKING HER A MINOR FOR POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISER HIGHTOWER FOR HER EMANCIPATED DAUGHTER TYCEE LAQITA HIGHTOWER CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT 5 TIMES THAT WAS NEVER OWED AND NOT HIS CHILD AND THEY HAVE ADMITTED TO THE VERACITY OF THIS VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DEFAULT BUT COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE TRYING TO CONTINUOUSLY COVER-UP THE MAYHEM & EGREGIOUS INJUSTICES BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR COVERING UP A PLETHORA OF CRIMES ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER WHERE THE MAY 29TH EMAIL WAS SENT TO PRESIDING JUDGE REGINA SCANNICCHIO TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1  The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

WITH AFFIDAVIT

 

A-    The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,    1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

 

2.           That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules, Plaintiff in specific detail outlined each judicial proceeding complained of, alleged specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or otherwise improper, and named the particular judges, parties and other individuals involved and the extent of their involvement in each claim of "fraudulent" or otherwise improper conduct. 

 

I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel  Pro Se, Respondent Movant in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;

 

1.)   That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”

 

2.)    That Respondent filed Oct 26, 2023, Re Noticed (Nov. 15, 2023) a Petition to ZERO OUT Child Support due to Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct as He Illegally Acted as an Enforcement Official for Public Aid on behalf of Police Officer Francoise L.B. Hightower, Induced Reliance on judges Fraudulently to Remand Respondent into Custody 5 times for Allegedly Owing Child Support on a case Dismissed Sept.17, 1987 and Judge Entered a Final Judgment Default May 18, 1988 on Defective Service Never Vacated and Never Ordered Respondent to Pay Child Support Making any and all Orders after the above date Void, with an Affidavit, Petitioner nor the States Attorneys never DENIED OR OBJECTED to the VERACITY of said Pleadings.

A-    That Page 16 of the Re Noticed Motion, PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Nov. 15, 2023 said RE Notice of Motion was hereby filed with the Petition to Zero Out Child Support et al. with the attachments and emailed to all parties recorded in said notice via electronic service along with the requested documents per court directive showing that the States Attorney was in fact the last attorney of record.

 

B-    That a Cook County judge who tried helping the Defendant while in CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDERED him Dec 20, 1994, “to continue his efforts being reinstated by the CTA” “He is ordered to produce all names and documents which may help the court determine his employment status with the CTA” via Ex H, said judge was removed immediately from the case

 

Former CCSA Thomas Kantas was the point person in the hierarchy of the States Attorney’s office who had Carolyn Kennedy, Amy Bernard and Brian Volkman representing Police Officer Francoise Hightower when her daughter was 21 years old receiving numerous unlawful court orders, whereby; Defendant had been REMANDED into CUSTODY 5 times for ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT, see the Notice of Petition filed Nov 1, 2005 and all related documents demonstrating the States Attorneys representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer (totaling 17 pages).

September 21, 2023, the Supreme Court of Illinois entered an order striking Thomas Alexander Kantas’s name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois 

No comments:

Post a Comment