Justice Jackson Enlightens On The 14th Amendment In Supreme Court Debut
That Pursuant to Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.
“Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
IN THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISIO1N
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D
079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
RESPONDENT’S
MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE
MARITZA MARTINEZ INSTANTER FOR “CAUSE” HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3)
AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” SHE
IS ENGAGING IN PRIMAE FACIE SHOWING
OF AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING
UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES MAKING HER ORDER VOID/NULLITY DUE TO PETITIONER &
ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN SAID CONSPIRACY
AND JUDGE CHAVIRA BEING A FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY USED HER UNLAWFUL
AUTHORITY WITH FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY THOMAS KANTAS IN COVERING-UP
CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT IN
MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS CAUSING AN EMANCIPATED ADULT TYCEE HIGHTOWER TO APPEAR
AS A MINOR SO AS TO EXTORT MONEY FROM THE RESPONDENT JUDGE NEVER HAD
JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE TO DISQUALIFY CHAVIRA AND THE
ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY IS SHOWING AS A CAUCASIAN SHE CAN VIOLATE ANY LAWS
WHERE RESPONDENT IS CONCERNED AND ADMITTED REPRESENTING CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER
DUE TO BLACK DEMOCRATS HAVING NO AUTHORITY OVER CERTAIN CAUCASIAN & VACATE
ALL ORDERS AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER
W /BODY ATTACHEMENT w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence,
Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons
and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification
Instanter et al;
1.)
That unbeknown to said
“Private Citizens” impersonating Cook County judges, the State of Illinois
Division of Child Support sent the Respondent a Letter June 13, 2024 (HFS) for the first time in over 30 years, ASA Harris acknowledged having a Court Order from a
Judge in 2007 where Tycee Hightower was emancipated in 2002, before judge
Chavira
hereto attached as a Gr Ex 1 and the Respondent replied
expeditiously July 1, 2024 via email to every Democratic Person in the legal
profession,
A-
That a Child Support representative called the Respondent August
31st 2023 of 312 793-2526 23 minutes 40 seconds, stating she
received a referral from Springfield to ZERO out child support et al. hereto
attached as Gr Ex 2 Respondent asked her a question in Spanish, she did
not answer because it was learned that she was of Polish ethnicity.
B-
That on June 26, 2020, ref as Gr Ex 3, Respondent sent
Governor Pritzker an Official Complaint against Employers in the Illinois
Department of Child Support et al.
C-
That the letter on its
face corroborates how racism and corruption played a major role against the
Respondent when Chavira was allegedly the Assistant States Attorney during the
years 2002-2007, the Illinois Dept of Public Aid Div of Child Support had the
Respondent in court illegally him and his family were on Public Aid as well and
he was taking his family to therapy at UIC 3-4 days out of the week and Public
Aid had to provide him additional monies so that he could get his family to
their appointments for the help that was needed coping with depression etc.
D-
That the Political
Machine rewarded every Black or Colored person who participated in the creation
or falsification of any documents or kept their mouths shut or snitched on
those trying to help him against the Respondent for the alleged Ku Klux Klan
judges and attorneys Lester Barclay is the President of the CTA, William
Stewart Boyd became a judge and a monster!, Iris Chavira allegedly received a
judicial position not qualified one bit, etc. but as long as Black and certain
Hispanics destroy their own ethnic groups, they will be rewarded a position in
the Democratic Party.
RE
NOTICE OF FILING
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD
OF $50
Million Dollars
Please be advised that on July
15, 2024 Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court, his Re Notice Motion
for Default Judgment of $50 Million Dollars; and will present said legally
sufficient instrument before the proper Judge who is presiding on this matter August
8, at 9:00 am via Zoom. Respondent appeared before Judge Andrea Webber
via Zoom on March 21, 2024 at 9:30 am, 2024, but never received a court order.
Zoom Link for Maritza Martinez
Meeting ID: 985 6932 0525
Password: 080942
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe
Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
MOTION TO RECUSE THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND
APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT
STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S
STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF
BACKDATING RECORDS MAKING HER A MINOR FOR POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISER HIGHTOWER
FOR HER EMANCIPATED DAUGHTER TYCEE LAQITA HIGHTOWER CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE
REMANDED INTO CUSTODY FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT 5 TIMES THAT WAS NEVER
OWED AND NOT HIS CHILD AND THEY HAVE ADMITTED TO THE VERACITY OF THIS VIA
SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DEFAULT BUT COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE TRYING TO CONTINUOUSLY
COVER-UP THE MAYHEM & EGREGIOUS INJUSTICES BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR COVERING
UP A PLETHORA OF CRIMES ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER WHERE THE MAY 29TH
EMAIL WAS SENT TO PRESIDING JUDGE REGINA SCANNICCHIO TO VACATE COURT ORDER
BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING
JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL
COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO
ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
A- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,
1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
2.
That
Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their
allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and
direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules, Plaintiff in
specific detail outlined each judicial proceeding complained of, alleged
specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or otherwise
improper, and named the particular judges, parties and other individuals
involved and the extent of their involvement in each claim of
"fraudulent" or otherwise improper conduct.
2.) That Respondent
filed Oct 26, 2023, Re Noticed (Nov. 15, 2023) a Petition to ZERO OUT
Child Support due to Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct as He
Illegally Acted as an Enforcement Official for Public Aid on behalf of Police
Officer Francoise L.B. Hightower, Induced Reliance on judges Fraudulently to
Remand Respondent into Custody 5 times for Allegedly Owing Child Support on a
case Dismissed Sept.17, 1987 and Judge Entered a Final Judgment Default May 18,
1988 on Defective Service Never Vacated and Never Ordered Respondent to Pay
Child Support Making any and all Orders after the above date Void, with an
Affidavit, Petitioner nor the States Attorneys never DENIED OR OBJECTED
to the VERACITY of said Pleadings.
A-
That Page 16 of the Re Noticed Motion, PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Nov. 15, 2023
said RE Notice of Motion was hereby filed with the Petition to Zero Out Child
Support et al. with the attachments and emailed to all parties recorded in said
notice via electronic service along with the requested documents per court
directive showing that the States Attorney was in fact the last attorney of
record.
B-
That a Cook County judge who tried helping the
Defendant while in CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDERED him Dec 20, 1994, “to continue
his efforts being reinstated by the CTA” “He is ordered to produce all
names and documents which may help the court determine his employment status
with the CTA” via Ex H, said judge was removed immediately from the
case
Former CCSA Thomas Kantas was the point person in the
hierarchy of the States Attorney’s office who had Carolyn Kennedy, Amy Bernard
and Brian Volkman representing Police Officer Francoise Hightower when her
daughter was 21 years old receiving numerous unlawful court orders, whereby;
Defendant had been REMANDED into CUSTODY 5 times for ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD
SUPPORT, see the Notice of Petition filed Nov 1, 2005 and all related
documents demonstrating the States Attorneys representing Police Officer
Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer (totaling 17 pages).
September 21, 2023, the
Supreme Court of Illinois entered an order striking Thomas Alexander Kantas’s
name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois amid
allegations of fraud and deception. Posted by AlabNews Staff Writer | Oct 24,
2023 | News, Illinois, State Level
C-
Pursuant to Page 9, Par 18, Page 8 Line1-2,
Judge Rivers seemed to have been in receipt of documents only he and Francoise
were cognizant of he asked her, “Did you also file answer interrogatories,
which were sworn to under oath by you, on April 4, 1986”?
Francoise Line 3, “Yes,
I did”.
Judge Rivers Lines 4-6,
“And that indicated, exactly, the time you lived with Mr. Hightower and had
intercourse with him, is that correct”?
Francoise Line 7, “Yes,
it did”.
3.)
That on week of June 13, 2024, Respondent received a letter
from the Illinois Dept of Healthcare and Family services Division of Child
Support Services, Monthly Billing Statement et al hereto attached as Gr Ex
1, Support for Children TYCEE HIGHTOWER an adult 39 years of age.
4.)
That Page 10, Par 20 of the aforementioned Par
2, Page 2 Page 9 Lines 5-14, Unequivocally corroborate no judge in
Cook County or the State of Illinois ever had jurisdiction on the Defendant in
any capacity, in that Judge Rivers stated, “Well, counsel, in reference to
the instant case, 88 D079012, there has not been no blood test ordered in this
case. Now, your client, the plaintiff here, has testified that the blood test
results were tendered to the court. That is not in this particular case. A
previous case having been nonsuited, as you have indicated in your complaint on
September 17, 1987. So, this is a new cause of action against the defendant,
although it involves the same parties and subject matter.”
A- That Page 10. Pars A, B That Jeanne Sprietsma who
was the Supervisor of all Court Reporters rallied all of her court reporters to
prepare transcripts of Francoise and her attorney appearing before Judge Rivers
without Defendant’s knowledge.
D-
Because Jeanne mysteriously died on a boat drowning it was not
sure if it was the result of “FOUL PLAY” due to this paternity case (she
was very sweet and an outspoken critic of the injustices in this case her court
reporters complained to her about what was going on in court), so the Cook
County Sheriff and certain members of the Police department advised the
Defendant not to name any person helping him not even them because everybody
knew Francoise’s father William Jenkins Hightower was sleeping with his
daughters, but couldn’t understand the kind of muscle he had staying on the
Police force as a Pedophile.
E-
That Ex 11, of the Motion to Zero Out Child Support et al
dated Nov. 1, 2005 Tycee Hightower was 21 years old emancipated but Judge Chavira
as an Assistant States Attorney along with Thomas Kantas who is the brother of
Nick Kantas in the Criminal Court allegedly orchestrated this entire extortion
scheme trying to steal any type of lump sum monies coming from any possible
settlements via IBC/wonder bread or the CTA.
F-
Nick Kantas in no way did he take part in any of the vicious
racist episodes, he provided to the Respondent excellent advice and to this day
his words of wisdom still is being heeded to this very day.
5.)
Plaintiff Francoise Hightower incited racial egregious hatred
at the innocent Respondent fabricated every account slandering him an attempt
to cover-up the fact, she was fucking her biological father and conceived his
child it was easy to defame his character by feeding into the racist
stereotypes of Black Men impregnating women and abandoning them and claiming he
was disgruntled being divorced from her sick as shit, they were never married,
Francoise’s mother Lydia Praxelle was a Caucasian and used this to her
advantage making sure he did not divulge the secret of William Jenkins
Hightower having sex with his daughters, she didn’t give a fuck as long as he
wasn’t sleeping with her, that’s why
Respondent was ordered never to go near Tycee or see her via Irish Drunk
judge James Meehan and to this day they never spoke or had any type of
dialogue.
6.)
That entry date of Order of Support 11/28/23, hereto
attached, Ex 2, Court Order Nov. 28, 2023, no where is it indicated
in said order of any child support orders entered corroborating a “Prima Facie”
showing of judicial corruption fraud.
7.)
That on May 28th, 2024, Respondent appeared before
judge Zellner in error and was courteously redirected to Judge Chavira’s call,
hereto attached, Gr Ex 3, Email (May 29, 2024) to Presiding Judge Regina
Scannicchio and cc’d to others in competent jurisdiction nobody replied to any
of the concerns noted in the email.
8.)
That Respondent, he has never filed a frivolous
motion in any court but is up against a plethora “Private Citizens” who are upholding Tyranny,
Racism, Corruption and Prima Facie Hate at him for understanding the laws and
its applications than so many of them due to their Political or Fraternal or
sexual Orientation him being a Heterosexual Freeman.
9.)
That on
Jan. 2, 2024 Judge Chivira was in receipt of said Summary Judgment and was
never legally recused from this matter upon Motion to Disqualify her (filed
Dec. 26, 2024)
10.)
That Clerks and judges demonstrated a malingering attempt to
undermine the Respondent or Judge by emailing to him a blank court order from
the Presiding judge Regina Scannicchio (Feb. 20, 2024) not signed, hereto
attached, Ex A.
11.)
That Judge Maritza Martinez was unaware of Rule 23.6 Substitution of
Judge of the Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure (C) Orders granting a
substitution of judge shall be accompanied by an order transferring the case to
the presiding judge of the division or district in which the case is then pending
for reassignment.
12.)
Judge Martinez became a willing participant in this “Organized
Conspiracy” by assuming jurisdiction on said matter becoming now a defacto
attorney and coconspirator, “Private Citizen” for the State Officials who have
already admitted to taking part in a plethora of Criminal Civil Rights
Violations.
A- Judge Martinez stated “they
asked me to preside over this matter on your request to get a new judge” March 27 at 10:10 am via
Zoom and had me to swear in to her clandestine hearing.
B- It is clear Judge Martinez
was operating under the authority of another alleged Terrorist cell within the
Democratic Party/Political Machine
C- She honestly admitted not
having Judicial Authority but a Personal Fraternal Authority on the behest of
doing what “THEY” told her to do.
Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million
Jury Verdict Against City in Shooting Incident
Wednesday,
February 24, 2021 Julie
Tappendorf
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a
jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7 million in damages
relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.
According to the court opinion, the plaintiff claimed that
a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an argument when the two had
been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain and other injuries. The
friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the shooting, arguing that
the City was responsible for the officer's conduct. Specifically, the plaintiff
claimed that the City's failure to have an "early warning system" to
identify officers who might engage in misconduct, failure to adequately investigate
and discipline officers who engage in misconduct, and the "code of
silence" among police officers contributed to the shooting incident. The
City argued that the officer was off duty and not acting under "color of
state law" at the time of the shooting, so the City was not liable under
Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. The case made its way to a jury which
found the City of Chicago liable and awarded $44.7 million in damages to the
plaintiff. The jury found that two of the City's policies - its failure to
maintain an adequate early warning system and failure to adequately investigate
and discipline officers - caused the officer to shoot his friend.
The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals,
which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that
although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were
grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the
officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer. The
Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes
liability only when a municipality has violated a federal
right. Since none of the plaintiff's federal rights were violated, the
court of appeals overturned the jury verdict against the City of Chicago.
13.)
That on April 16,
2024, Judge Chivira appeared on the 9:00 call and acknowledged the Respondent
and stated she was going to call his case at 9:30 am but she had him sitting
frivolously knowing Francoise nor the Assistant States Attorney were going to
appear.
14.)
She stated, “that the Clerk’s did not file said Motion
in the Database” even though, I had a file stamped copy she stated for me to
return to the 8th floor and let them know that it was not filed.
A-
Judge Chivira made it clear she was continuing the case until
next Tuesday April 23rd at 9:05.
B-
The computer reflects that Judge Chivira continued this
matter to May 28, 2024 on State’s Attorney Motion/Continuances at 9:05 am,
hereto attached, Gr Ex B, a Printout from the Electronic Docket
C-
FOR THE RECORD PER GR EX B, Respondent never had
MANILOW AND GOLDMAN as his attorneys they were made up to make it look like
he had legal representation when all of these unlawful acts were taking place
on behalf of Police Officer Francoise and when her biological Police officer
father was alive.
15.)
She appeared not to either understand what she was looking at
or was pretending via zoom because it was filed as she said under the Notice of
Filing.
16.)
Respondent emailed (April 17, 2024, 11:08 am) Judge Chivira
and Chief Judge hereto attached, Ex C explaining he never received a
Court Order nobody responded.
A- “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be
absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support
a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation,
ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment,
order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or
collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill.
App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1)
General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is
an agreement to commit an unlawful act. —U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819,
537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues. -Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to
the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality. -Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe
inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest
of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time
of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending
culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action
for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material
nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing
reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter,
1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal
Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a
cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as
“fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2)
known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the
other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of
the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
17.)
The
United States Supreme Court acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook
County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest
judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine
federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey
v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other
judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 &
4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who
have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded
as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a
recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The
Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter
upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can
add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that
finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472,
483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to
hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any
jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
A- The Seventh Circuit failed to institute
a law stating to EXECUTE, or LIFE IN PRISON or any other related penalty for
those who are complicit in these said crimes, so many who are the majority in
control and controlling inferior people have put Blacks on the front line as
PAWNS, in the event the government learns of this successful coup, they will
apprehend all Inferior Blacks first.
B- That every person regardless to their
color, sexuality or Political/Fraternal associations who became complicit in
any enumerated acts should be sentenced/executed in the same like manner as if
they were the original perpetrators
History shows that it does not matter who is in power... those who
have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never
obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they did in the beginning.
"When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry
about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder.
He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send
him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no
back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it
necessary." Carter G. Woodson, 1933
a.
To
show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the
alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either
because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
b.
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
18.)
That the word Political Machine is a buzz word for Ku Klux Klan or
any Racist Insurrectionist Order and an excuse Justifying the unlawful
applications of Jim Crow Laws still being ENFORCED which are
Outlawed by the United States Supreme Court but the Apartheid Racist Terrorist
Applications of those laws have been systematically circumvented by recruiting
the necessary inferior Blacks and Hateful Anglo-Saxons or any other ethnic race
willing to continually inflict GENOCIDE, TYRANNY, MASS
DESTRUCTION on any ethnic group they deem inferior as demonstrated throughout
all documents.
19.)
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once said,
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps
to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without
protesting against it is really cooperating with it
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays
for the Relief
1. For an Order
Disqualifying Judge Chavira Judge Martinez and the entire Cook County Judiciary
Instanter for the Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon the Laws and being “Private
Citizens” upholding racism Terrorism and a plethora of Criminal Frauds at the
Defendant.
2. For an Order transferring certain parts of this matter to a Judge in the
Federal venue due to Corruption and
Fraud;
3. For
an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of
this matter;
4. For an Order issuing a
Mandatory Injunction of HFS/Child Support Enforcement to Prohibit said unit
from prosecuting any more cases until an investigation is had ascertaining all
parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise.
A-
That said ASA Harris and the Caucasian
ASA on the Nov 14, 2023 be referred for Law License be REVOKED INSTANTER
for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and every other ASA
involved.
5. For an Order investigating
the Clerks who was responsible for ascertaining the names of other Attorneys
not Recommended to be judges who bypassed the proper legal requirements and
finagled their way to the Cook County Ballot.
6. For
an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all
Assistant States Attorneys, Clerks and State employees involved in this
matter;
7. For an Order assigning this
matter away from the Cook County judges and Special Prosecutor to enforce any
and all proceedings
8. For the entry of an Order
awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief
necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly
just;
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928
decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead
v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of
conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is
imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it,
"if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it
invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare
that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to
declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction
of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious
doctrine this court should resolutely set its
face."
_________________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
NOTICE OF
MOTION TO RECUSE THE ENTIRE
COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF
2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW
HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY
TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS MAKING HER A MINOR FOR
POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISER HIGHTOWER FOR HER EMANCIPATED DAUGHTER TYCEE LAQITA
HIGHTOWER CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING
CHILD SUPPORT 5 TIMES THAT WAS NEVER OWED AND NOT HIS CHILD AND THEY HAVE
ADMITTED TO THE VERACITY OF THIS VIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT/DEFAULT BUT COOK COUNTY
JUDGES ARE TRYING TO CONTINUOUSLY COVER-UP THE MAYHEM & EGREGIOUS
INJUSTICES BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR COVERING UP A PLETHORA OF CRIMES
ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER WHERE THE MAY 29TH EMAIL WAS SENT TO
PRESIDING JUDGE REGINA SCANNICCHIO TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY
(MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND
INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY
REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
WITH AFFIDAVIT
Please be advised that on June 21, 2024 Respondent has filed
before this Domestic Relations Division
Motion to Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary et al; and will present said
legally sufficient instrument before any Judge 2024
in her stead at 9:30 am in room via Zoom
Zoom Link
Meeting ID: 84376080114
Password: 086627
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice and Motion to all parties
recorded in said Notice via regular mail/electronic delivery.
Governor
JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon. Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Judge Derico mfmlcalendar56@cookcountyil.gov
Jaime Barcus jaime.barcas@cookcountyil.gov
ccc.domrelcr3006@cookcountyil.gov
Francoise
L.B. Hightower-Belmer 1152 West 102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx
timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Attorney General Cook County Sheriff’s
Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal pmal@potestivolaw.com
press@cookcountyil.gov bthompson@potestivolaw.com
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
I Joe Louis Lawrence,
Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings
enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned
certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and
correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief
and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believes the same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
No comments:
Post a Comment