BLACK DEMOCRATS ESPECIALLY JUDGES ARE PROMOTED OR ELEVATED ON THEIR ABILITIES TO MAINTAIN THE OLD SCHOOL DOCTRINES OF MAINTAINING HATE, RACISM AND KEEPING UP WITH JIM CROW LAWS IN CHICAGO ILLINOIS COURTS.

NO BLACK NEGRO IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAVE POSITION TO QUESTION, ADMONISH OR SAY ANYTHING ABOUT EGREGIOUS RACIST ACTS REGARDING CERTAIN CAUCASIANS THEIR OWN AUTHORITY IS LIMITED UPON THE BLACK AND COLORED ETHNIC GROUPS

CERTAIN BLACKS OF AN INFERIOR DISPOSITION ARE PREFERRED OVER CERTAIN ETHNIC GROUPS OR EDUCATED FREE BLACKS BECAUSE OF THEIR OBEDIENCE AND SERVITUDE TO CERTAIN CAUCASIANS WHO ARE SPONSORING THEM IT'S LIKE THEY ARE POLITICAL SLAVES WHO CAN'T THINK OR ACT WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION.

LOOK AT HOW FREDRENNA LYLE CREATED JOB SECURITY BY ALLOWING RACIST BANK ATTORNEYS TO FEED THEIR FAMILIES BY PROLONGING AN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE CASE THAT A CAUCASIAN JUDGE DISMISSED 16 YEARS AGO.

THE SAD REALITY THIS IS HOW INFERIOR BLACKS ALLOW THIS CORRUPT RACIST LEGAL SYSTEM DEPLETE THE FINANCIAL EARNINGS OF RETIRED CIVIL SERVANTS, BUT NOT ONE BLACK DEMOCRAT SAID SHIT ABOUT THESE EGREGIOUS HATEFUL RACIST CORRUPT ACTS.

THE POLITICAL MACHINE NEEDS THESE SELL OUT BLACKS WHO WILL PUT THEIR POLITICAL CAREERS ON THE LINES SAVING THEIR POLITICAL MASTERS AS IF THIS CITY WAS A GIANT PLANTATION OR HORRIFIC HOLACAUST OF THE WORSE KIND COMMITTING GENOCIDE ONLY ON PEOPLE OF COLOR.

MOST OF THE BLACKS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WHO ESPOUSE THESE VALUES HATE WHO THEY ARE OR THEIR SKIN COLOR AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO UPHOLD THE DOCTRINES OF THE THESE RACIST ACTS SO AS TO ACCEPTED AND LOVED BY THEIR POLITICAL MASTERS.

MOST BLACKS SEEM SO SINCERE IN REQUESTING THE BLACK VOTE ONLY TO BACKSTAB THEM IF YOU EVER APPEAR BEFORE THEM FOR JUSTICE, THE WORSE PERSONS FOR ANY BLACK OR COLORED PERSON TO APPEAR BEFORE IS A BLACK JUDGE MALE OR FEMALE.

JUST READ THE FIRST PAGE OF THIS THE TITLE IT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.

THIS IS WHY SO MANY IMMIGRANTS AND THE YOUTH ARE CHAOTIC AND PROFOUND LAW BREAKERS BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE RESPECTABLE BLACK LEADERS AT THE HELM BUT SO MANY WHO HAVE ASCENDED TO THEIR POSITIONS DESTROYING AND SACRIFICING THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS FOR ACCEPTANCE IN THE POLITICAL MACHINE.

            IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

 

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               ) Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 ) 

 Petitioner                                                                 )

                                                                                 )          

V.                                                                              ) Judge James T. Derico

                                                                                 )                                                                                                                                                                      ) Room 2804    

                                                                                 )

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                  )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia            )   Cal 56        

Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                 )

                                                           Respondents  )

                                                                                                                                    

RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO VACATE FORECLOSURE SALE AND CONFIRMATION OF SALE (MARCH 15, 2022,)  DUE TO COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY PURSUANT TO ILCS 735 5/2 -1401 sub section (f) NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS SECTION AFFECTS ANY EXISTING RIGHT TO RELIEF FROM A VOID ORDER OR JUDGMENT AND STAY OF ANY EVICTIONS PENDING ORDER OF THE COURT DUE TO THE PRIMAE FACIE SHOWING OF MORTGAGE FRAUD INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ILLINOIS COURTS COMMISSION, STATE POLICE AND FBI/US ATTORNEY w/AFFIDAVIT DUE TO 14^TH AMENDEMENT VIOLATIONS

   Now comes Respondent, Monzella Y. Johnson et al. being represented Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion to Vacate Confirmation Sale et al;

 

1.)     That Respondent received a 9 Page Memorandum Order from Judge Gillespie #1 and #2 of Page 9 of her June 3, 2010 Order states “That Defendants Monzella Johnson and Marcia Johnson’s Motion to Vacate the November 3, 2009 sale is GRANTED and the sale is VACATED Motion to Vacate the Judgment of Foreclosure entered on June 3, 2009 is GRANTED because of the Insufficient Affidavit of Proof”

 

2.)     That Par #5 states “That neither party shall file any pleadings without prior leave of the court.”

 

3.)    Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

 

4.)     That the Appellate Court’s Order Page 5 Par 14, Page 6, states “The Court’s decision to vacate the June 2009 foreclosure judgment and subsequent foreclosure sale was actually based on one of the issues defendants raise here, namely that the affidavit plaintiff was required to file in order to support the foreclosure judgment was “wholly insufficient”. We affirm the trial court’s order.

A-    That the Plaintiff’s never requested Leave of the Court pursuant to #5 of Par 2.

 

B-     That the Plaintiff’s never complied with Judge Gillespie’s Order of Par 1 nor did they comply with the Affirming of the Appellate Court pursuant to Par 4 hereto attached, Caucasian Presiding Judge Pamela H. Gillespie VACATING FORECLOSURE/SALE JUNE 2009, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, 9 PAGES.  

 

C-    That hereto attached First District Appellate Court Judges, Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr. James R. Epstein and Joseph Gordon AFFIRMED Judge Gillespie’s Court Decision, Dec 30, 2011.

 

 That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules, Plaintiff in specific detail outlined each judicial proceeding complained of, alleged specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or otherwise improper, and named the particular judges, parties and other individuals involved and the extent of their involvement in each claim of "fraudulent" or otherwise improper conduct. 

 

D-   That Judge Lyle realizing, she never had jurisdiction no Anglo-Saxon controlling her would admonish her for violating the Civil Rights of Colored People with the understanding knowing that the Illinois Judicial system is racist towards people of Color demonstrated her amplified role as a co-conspirator to all Terrorist Acts by entering a Court Order VOID/ A NULLITY VACATING THE SALE OF RESPONDENT’S HOME et al, (Oct. 29, 2018) for the same Plaintiff’s “TRESPASSED UPON 5.)

    

5.)  That Judge Lyle never had jurisdiction and violated the very laws violating her Oath  “ENGAGED IN TREASON OFFENSES, (MAY 5, 2021) ENTERED AN ORDER 2 YEARS SEVEN MONTHS LATER TO U.S. BANK from her other Order Vacating;

 

6.)  Judge Robert Adrian, a veteran judge in downstate Quincy, Illinois, faced removal from the bench due to his controversial actions. In 2022, he reversed a guilty ruling against a young man in a sexual assault case. The Illinois Courts Commission issued a rare decision, stating that Adrian attempted to circumvent the state’s mandatory minimum sentencing law during a sentencing hearing for Drew Clinton, who was previously found guilty of sexually assaulting 16-year-old Cameron Vaughan at a 2021 graduation party. Adrian justified his reversal by claiming that the Adams County prosecutor had “totally failed” to prove Clinton’s guilt, but the commission saw this as a subterfuge. They concluded that the judge intentionally circumvented the law to satisfy his personal belief about a just sentence, resulting in the reversal of the criminal defendant’s conviction¹.

A-   Whereby Inducing Reliance on this court now before Judge Derico because his March 1, 2024 Court Order DENYING said Motion for Reconsideration et al. is predicated on the egregious actions of Mortgage Fraud of Judge Lyle entering Court Orders where she never had jurisdiction.

 

B-     That Judge Lyle  Entered a VOID ORDER / A NULLITY Granted the Plaintiff’ a Default Judgment Dec 6, 2017, and Ordered the Confirmation Sale (8 years after the judgment of Judge Gillespie) of said property ignoring every criminal act said attorneys and she was complicit in said “Organized Criminal Conspiracy”

 

C-    That said EGREGIOUS CALLOUS disposition towards senior citizens fighting to remain in their home from an OVERT ACT of Mortgage Fraud is no different from a thug in the streets carjacking and robbing them and shooting them even though they have complied with the criminals, in this matter Respondents have adhered to Steinbrecher v Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001), “Pro se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”

The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.   

7.)  That every attorney Plaintiff has retained has violated all of RPC 3.3 and the Ethics

            All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.

 

            RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of that rule states:

(a)  In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:

(1)  make a statement of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false;

 

(2)  fail to disclose to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

 

(3)  fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

 

(4)  Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;

 

(5)  participate in the creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the evidence is false ;

 

(6)  counsel or assist the client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;

 

(7)  engage in other illegal conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;

 

(8)  fail to disclose the identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;

 

(9)  intentionally degrade a witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning that person which are not relevant to the case;

 

(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;

 

8.)  That no Judge seems to understand or know their Oaths to the Bench, In Illinois, 705 ILCS 205/4 states "Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:

 

'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.'"

 

In Illinois, a judge must take a second oath of office. Under 705 ILCS 35/2 states, in part, that "The several judges of the circuit courts of this State, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State:

 

'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of judge of ______ court, according to the best of my ability.'"

Further, if the judge had enlisted in the U.S. military, then he has taken a third oath. Under Title 10 U.S.C. Section 502 the judge had subscribed to a lifetime oath, in pertinent part, as follows: "I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; ...".

 

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.

 

Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason.

 

If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason. 

The United States Supreme Court acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

9.)    That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2014/12/blacklivesdontmatter-judgemikva-never.html?spref=tw

 

A-     That said case (88 D 079012) they had to recruit a judge from the juvenile division because no judge in the Daley Center aka (Babylon, Hell, etc.) wanted to have any dealings with the Respondent, Judge Mikva told the Respondent “he had a Gift, he can tell a story using the laws and she understood everything he was saying, in that his pleadings were unique not the way law school teaches students how to plead.”

 

B-    In Re                                1-23-1065

                                                            FIRST DIVISION

                         APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT

                                                    FIRST DISTRICT

                                               )      

Joe Louis Lawrence                                             )   Petition For Review Of The Order

                                                                             )   Of The Illinois Labor Relations

    Petitioner-Appellant                                        )   Board State Panel

                                                                             )

                                                                             )

                      VS                                                  )

                                                                             )           ILRB Nos. L-CB-23-004

                                                                             )

                                                                             )

The Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel )

Lynne O. Sneed, Charles E. Anderson, Angela   )

C. Thomas, Kimberly Faith Stevens, in her         )

Official Capacity as Executive Director  Of The )

Illinois Labor Relations Board,                            )

A.T.U Local 241, President Keith Hill;               )

                                                                              )

          Respondents-Appellees                              ) 

Hereto Attached as Gr Ex 1, Appellant filed a MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND VACATE THE FEB 28, DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION DUE TO JUDGE TERRANCE LAVINE OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE & ACTED AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” DENIED EVERY MOTION PETITIONER FILED AND ORDERED THE CLERKS IN THE APPELLATE COURT NOT TO ACCEPT HIS MOTIONS DUE TO THEM BEING FRIVOLOUS SAID CLERKS WERE IN FACT INTIMIDATED BECAUSE OF HIS JUDICIAL STATUS PETITIONER NEVER WAS SUPPOSED TO SUBMIT A BRIEF BECAUSE THE LABOR BOARD NEVER HAD A RECORD OR INVESTIGATED THE CTA OR ATU LOCAL 241 IL 4^TH DISTRICT JUDGES LISA HOLDER WHITE, CAVANAGH AND KNECHT IN RE CITY OF SULLIVAN V THE ILL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CREATED A PRECEDENT IN THE LAWS THAT WAS EGREGIOUSLY IGNORED BECAUSE OF PETITIONER’S SKIN COLOR AND PRO SE STATUS (filed March 1, 2024 at 9:51am) and was DENIED immediately at 1:54pm before any judge received it. )

 

        1. Allegedly a Clerk impersonated a Judge and MaryAnn Kaya emailed Ex 3.

 

C-    That upon the filing of the aforementioned Motion and leaving the building security and a State Marshall requested he wait while he was the elevator and on the first floor informed him he was not allowed to ever enter the Bilandic Building, hereto attached Gr 2 an Order signed by judges with no explanation of any alleged crime, the Order is dated Sept. 22, 2023 and he informed the Marshalls and building security, he was not aware and never received any email to this fact and he only received a court order two days ago is the only reason, he was in the building, hereto attached Ex 3, Court Order  dated Feb 28, 2024 with judges names typed not signed, but on Gr Ex 2 they are signed.

 

D-    That because no attorney in any of the courts were able to manipulate the laws and defeat the Plaintiff acting Pro Se in his behalf and said attorneys and law firms concurred by agreeing to everything, to what he has asserted in his pleadings as being TRUTHFUL by not Objecting or Denying to anything recorded in his Pleadings accompanied via Affidavits, judges resented him because of his skin color and the fact they could not suspend any law license in an attempt to stop him from particularizing the “Fraudulent Criminal Civil Rights Violations of judges, so they became “Private Citizens” pursuant to Section 1983 imposing liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right.

 

10.)     That Respondent’s had Attorney Joseph P. Harris (LAW LICENSES SUSPENDED) as their attorney in this foreclosure matter and egregious false charges were levied against him in the same manner they were levied against Attorney Lanre Amu By Jonathan Bilyk Dec 17, 2013

    

The Review Board of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) has recommended a three-year suspension for a Chicago lawyer who accused four Cook County judges of corruption, including allegations they fixed cases.

In its Dec. 13 report, a panel of the Review Board affirmed the ARDC Hearing Board's May recommendation that 'Lanre O. Amu should lose his law license for three years based on misconduct that represented “a risk of harm to his clients, to the profession and to the integrity of the legal system.”

11.)      That when you complain of Mortgage Fraud or about the judges involved you get your law license suspended and now if you are a Pro se person of Color defending yourself against corrupt or racist judges, they enter Orders keeping you out of the very building you need to go into for further relief being the Appellate Court or Supreme Court of Illinois where Judge Lyle is now a part of.

 

12.)       That as Pro Se senior citizens, there is not a scintilla of falsity in any of said pleadings showing Judge Lyle ever had jurisdiction to ALLOW any EVICTION BY THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS  from their home of over 60 years.

 

A-    Respondent filed a Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Report of Sale (Court Order Being Void/ A Nullity) And Distribution, Confirming Sale and Eviction Order, And for a Personal Deficiency Judgment, Order Finding Personal Deficiency Due to Judge Lyle & Other Attorneys/Judges Complicit in a Criminal Enterprise of Mortgage Fraud Affidavit of PHH Mortgage Corp. Corroborating Their Involvement Stealing Home Warranting A Rule to Show Cause Remanding All Parties Instanter Into Custody w/ Body Attachment & Disqualifying Judge Lyle Instanter  (April 25, 2022) in the  Circuit Court of Cook County detailing a Plethora of Criminal Enterprise Actions.

 

B-    That Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Monzella Y. Johnson’s Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Sale (Court Order Being a Void/Nullity) And Distribution et al. (Interpreted as a Motion To Vacate The Order Approving Sale For Not Receiving Notice) (filed June 24, 2022)

 

C-    That Respondent knowing that the Plaintiffs were not going to file any reply or comply with judge Lyle’s court order, so Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion Pursuant to all State of Illinois and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit seeking $33 Million Dollars for the number of years they have been frivolously before the courts FRAUDULENTLY 14 YEARS (Filed June 2, 2022).

 

RESPONDENT’S REPLY MOTION STRIKING PETITIONER’S RESPONSE MOTION TO MONZELLA Y. JOHNSON’S MOTION