ATTENTION LAW ENFORCEMENT THERE ARE TERRORIST INSURGENTS WORSE THAN THE PERSONS WHO TRIED TO SEIZE THE WHITEHOUSE.
THIS MOTION WAS FILED TODAY THIS MORNING AND AFTER FILING THE DOCUMENT THE ILLINOIS MARSHALLS SERVED ME A COPY OF A COURT ORDER WHERE JUDGES OF THE DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that this order supersedes the Court's September 7, 2023, order concerning individuals not allowed access to, or only allowed first floor lobby access to, the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle St., Chicago, Illinois ("MABB")
IT IS ORDERED that Building Security shall not permit the individuals listed below to enter or remain within the Michael A. Bilandic Building. If any of these individuals wish to file documents with, or contact personnel in, the Clerk's Office of the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, they must do so by utilizing the services of the U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier. Should any of these individuals require access to government services in this building other than from the Appellate Court Clerk's office, they shall employ acceptable alternate means.
PERSONS DENIED ACCESS TO THE MABB
There are 21 names recorded and my name is recorded last Joe Louis Lawrence a/k/a Joe Louis
The State Marshall identified himself, I knew who he was and asked me if I used or went by the name of Eugene Brown who is on the list, I said No!
I DON'T KNOW HOW IN THE FUCK MY NAME WAS RECORDED, I HAVE NEVER HAD ANY BEEF OR MISUNDERSTANDINGS WITH ANYONE BUT THE NAMES OF THE JUDGES ARE
JUSTICE, CHAIR OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE DAVID W. ELLIS
JUSTICE, VICE-CHAIR OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MARY L. MIKVA
JUSTICE TERRANCE LAVIN
JUSTICE BERTINA LAMPKIN
JUSTICE THOMAS HOFFMAN
JUSTICE MICHAEL B. HYMAN ORDER DATED SEPT 22, 2023
I NEVER RECEIVED THIS ORDER UNTIL TODAY ONLY AFTER FILING THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION WITH NO SIGNATURES ONLY TYPED, I DIDN'T WANT TO PUT THE ORDER ON MY BLOG BECAUSE OF OTHER NAMES RECORDED.
There is not one Black Person in the Democratic Party who has a voice or responsible authority over certain Caucasians. only persons of Color primarily those of American Black or Hispanic ethnic groups.
RACISM AND TERRORISM IS SYNONAMOUS TO THE TYRANNY AND CORRUPTION REINING IN OUR COURTS AND STATE AGENCIES WARRANTING SPECIAL FORCES/ANTI TERRORIST UNITS TO INFILTRATE THE GOVERNMENT AND FETTER OUT DOMESTIC TERRORISTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS ALLEGED COURT ORDER PURPORTEDLY CAME FROM THE JUDGES TODAY STOPPING THE ATTORNEYS FROM RESPONDING.
BLACK DEMOCRATS ARE SITTING BACK IN AUTHORITY KEEPING THEIR MOUTHS AT THE EGREGIOUS CRIMES PERPETRATED ON INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR AND IS EMBRACING EVERY ASPECT OF APARTHEID AND JIM CROW AGAINST THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS IN AN ATTEMPT TO BE ACCEPTED BY RACIST HATEFUL INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE NO RESPECT FOR ANY OF THEM.
IF THESE ARE KU KLUX KLAN, NAZI MEMBERS OR INDEPENDENT INSURRECTIONIST WHO HAVE SUCCESFULLY SEIZED THE ILLINOIS COURTS AND STATE AGENCIES, DUE TO INFERIOR NEGROES WHO HAVE SOLD OUT AND HAVE LIMITED OR NO AUTHORITY CAN ANYONE DIRECT ME TO THE SOURCE OR MEDIA PERSONNEL WHO CAN BRING AWARENESS TO THESE RACIAL HOLOCAUST ACTS?
1-23-1065
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS
APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
)
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Petition For Review Of The Order
) Of The Illinois Labor Relations
Petitioner-Appellant ) Board State Panel
)
)
VS
)
) ILRB Nos. L-CB-23-004
)
)
The Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel )
Lynne O. Sneed, Charles E. Anderson, Angela )
C. Thomas, Kimberly Faith Stevens, in her )
Official Capacity as Executive Director Of The )
Illinois Labor Relations Board, )
A.T.U Local 241, President Keith Hill; )
)
Respondents-Appellees )
________________________________________________________________________
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND VACATE THE FEB 28, DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION DUE TO
JUDGE TERRANCE LAVINE OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE & ACTED AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN”
DENIED EVERY MOTION PETITIONER FILED AND ORDERED THE CLERKS IN THE APPELLATE
COURT NOT TO ACCEPT HIS MOTIONS DUE TO THEM
BEING FRIVOLOUS SAID CLERKS WERE IN FACT INTIMIDATED BECAUSE OF HIS JUDICIAL
STATUS PETITIONER NEVER WAS SUPPOSED TO SUBMIT A BRIEF BECAUSE THE LABOR BOARD
NEVER HAD A RECORD OR INVESTIGATED THE CTA OR ATU LOCAL 241 IL 4TH
DISTRICT JUDGES LISA HOLDER WHITE, CAVANAGH AND KNECHT IN RE CITY OF SULLIVAN V
THE ILL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CREATED A PRECEDENT IN THE LAWS THAT WAS
EGREGIOUSLY IGNORED BECAUSE OF PETITIONER’S SKIN COLOR AND PRO SE STATUS
Now comes Petitioner Joe Louis Lawrence Appearing Counsel Pro Se
in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files
herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion for Reconsideration et al;
1.)
Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to
the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of
original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of
law. Continental Cas. Co. v.
Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill.
App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
2.)
The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial
court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002,
270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied
pending appeal; et al.
3.)
Pursuant to 735 ILCS
5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings,
Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made
In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot
be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris,
App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
4.) PLEASE BE ADVISED that on March 6, 2023, A Notice of Appeal
has been filed before the State of Illinois, Illinois Labor Relations Board General
Counsel and served on all parties in the aforementioned Notice of Appeal
5.) That
on June 23, 2023, Petitioner filed a Motion for Rule to Show Cause for
Remand Body Attachment Instanter due to Fraud of State Employees, ATU 241 Local
Officers, CTA Employees et al.
A-
Judge
Terrance Lavine Denied said Motion
6.) That on July 3, 2023,
Petitioner filed a Motion to Supplement Motion for Rule to Show Cause for
Remand et al.
A-
Petitioner
never received a Court Order for this Motion.
7.) That because Judge
Terrance Lavine not only acted as a “Private Citizen” but became a de
facto attorney for the Respondents by ignoring and closing his eyes to all
of the prima facie evidence of racism, corruption and fraud of State
Employees destroying documents and covering up egregious crimes.
8.) That because Judge
Terrance Lavine used his robe unlawfully and further engaged in racist hate
crimes against the Petitioner by violating his Civil Rights pursuant to Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act.
9.) That on July 17, 2023, Motion
to Disqualify Judge Terrance Lavine and all First District Judges Pursuant to
Canon Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 9 (b) et al.
B-
Judge Terrance Lavine became a law unto himself and Denied said Motion
making it clear to every Black leader Kwame Raoul, Attorney General, Kim Foxx,
States Attorney, Timothy Calvin Evans, Chief judge and Mayor Brandon Johnson and President Toni Preckwinkle as a
judge he is UNTOUCHABLE and he is able to do whatever he wants wearing his robe
and no Black official has authority over him or certain other Caucasians and
that they are to remain in their places and continue to remain quiet whenever
they violate any laws over persons of Color as demonstrated in this matter.
10.) That Fed Rule
Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their
allegations of "fraud on the court" in as
short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules, Plaintiff
in specific detail outlined each judicial proceeding complained of, alleged
specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or otherwise
improper, and named the particular judges, parties and other individuals
involved and the extent of their involvement in each claim of
"fraudulent" or otherwise improper conduct.
11.) That because the 4th
Circuit already created a precedent in the laws in the aforementioned Judge
Terrance Lavine became a “Private Citizen” “Trespassed Upon the
Laws” determined to let the Petitioner know unequivocally that he and his
kind in the courts do not honor any laws that relates to persons of Color.
12.) That the Labor Board
never had a record from the CTA to weigh against the Petitioners Record, Judge
Terrance Lavine ignored the aforementioned laws where the 4th
District had already admonished Kimberly Faith Stevens and the Labor Board and
Kwame Raoul was the Attorney General racism and racial hatred and Labor
violations were still being repeated as if the judges were a joke.
13.) The Illinois Courts
Commission Removed Judge Adrian from the bench in Quincy Illinois for reversing
a Rape Charge on a Caucasian woman by KHQA Staff
Friday, Feb
23rd 2024
2022 IL App (4th) 200519, We will reverse the
Board’s findings of fact only if they are against the manifest weight of the
evidence. Champaign-Urbana Public Health District v. Illinois Labor Relations Board,
State Panel, 354 Ill. App. 3d 482, 487 (2004). we will reverse the Board’s determination
only if it is clearly erroneous. SPEED District 802 v. Warning, 242 Ill. 2d 92,
112 (2011). To so reverse, we must be convinced the Board committed a mistake.
The record on appeal is entirely
devoid of anything evidencing a Board investigation. The Board submits more
than once in its brief that the record contains the documents required by the
Illinois Supreme Court rules, implying that is the end of the inquiry. However,
it is not.
¶ 17 The Board must follow its own
rules, as those rules have force of law. Department of Central
Management Services/Illinois Commerce Comm'n v. Illinois Labor Relations Board,
State Panel, 406 Ill.App.3d 766, 771, 348 Ill. Dec. 226, 943
N.E.2d 1136 (2010). Further, the City rightfully insists the
Board comply with its own rules. Id. The problem facing us
is that, based on the record, we cannot determine if
[202 N.E.3d 919]
Id. the Board conducted an investigation such that we can
review the Board's action.
¶ 18 For this reason, the Board, like any other administrative agency, is
obligated to create and provide a record sufficient to permit judicial review
of its decisions. Miles v. Housing Authority, 2015 IL App
(1st) 141292, ¶ 23, 395 Ill. Dec. 689, 39 N.E.3d 156.
We can hold the absence of a complete record against such an agency, even when
the agency is not the party appealing. Id. An administrative body
must not only provide the reviewing court with the entire record of proceedings
but also a record of the evidence the agency considered. Id. The
body must do so in order for the court to undertake judicial review. Id. As
in Miles, because of the state of the record, "our
ability to conduct a meaningful judicial review has been thwarted." Id. ¶
29. Given the Board's decision is subject to judicial review, it is appropriate
the Board provide an adequate record so that we can undertake our review. Id. ¶
24.
¶ 19 In matters such as this one, it is
appropriate for a reviewing court to reverse and remand to the administrative
agency to detail its findings supporting its conclusions. Soto v. Board
of Fire & Police Commissioners, 2013 IL App (2d) 120677, ¶
32, 371 Ill. Dec. 181, 989
N.E.2d 1109. Our responsibility is to ensure the board acted in
compliance with the appropriate "legal parameters," which we cannot
do because there are no findings. Id. Among other inquiries,
we need to determine whether the Board relied on improper factors when granting
the petition. Id. ¶ 27.
14.) That
on August 3, 2023, Petitioner filed a Motion for Leave to File Supplemental
Record that was not submitted with the Administrative Record Instanter…. Motion
for Summary Judgment et al.
C-
Judge Terrance Lavine became a Law
unto himself unlawfully Denied said Motion, When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction
to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without
jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in
treason
D- That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42
U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not
to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d
384 (1990).
E-
That pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal,
conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently
violative of the Judicial Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v
Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972)
F-
That some of the Clerks were
noticeably uncomfortable behind the judges consistent Denials, Petitioner
explained to them this is racism.
15.) That
on August 8, 2023, Petitioner filed a Motion for Leave Requesting an Order to
Supplement the Record that was not Submitted with the Administrative Record et
al. Judge Terrance Lavine Denied the Motion.
G-
That the Clerks were confused as to
why the judge kept denying Petitioners Motions to Supplement when the record
and evidence showed that they failed to present the record and was under the
impression if it was explained an order was needed to compel them to present it
would satisfy the matter.
16.) That
every attorney agreed to every Pleading Petitioner filed and presented to the
courts by not objecting or challenging him due to its veracity stepped back and
let the judge continue his role as a de facto attorney and “Private Citizen” by
showing his racist hateful demeanor at the Petitioner by using his robe
unlawfully trying to “Lynch” him unjustly with his Ku Klux Klan style of
injustice.
H- Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud
104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue
involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction
of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of
examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL
334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. Hereto Attached Gr
Ex A
Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification Instanter of Judge for “Cause” Hate
Bias Prejudice Pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2—1001 (a) (2,3) Illinois Bar
& 12 Bar Associations Found Attorney not Recommended to be on ballot et al.
(Filed Dec 26, 2023).
I-
That the very Record the Illinois
Labor Board and Judge Terrance Lavine that they were trying to cover up of
their Brethren of the alleged “Good Ol Boy” network showing where Polish
ethnic Judge Ronald Bartkowicz admitting he issued an unlawful warrant against
the Petitioner and was a former CTA attorney and was shocked Petitioner learned
of this fact.
J-
That Petitioner filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment et al. (Dec 4, 2023) Nobody responded or denied it’s
veracity and it included the case involving Judge Terrance Lavine and Freddrenna
Lyle who was promoted to the Appellate court because of her ability to “FIX”
cases illegally in unlawful foreclosure matters.
K-
That Petitioner filed a Motion for Default Judgment of Fraud
of $50 Million Dollars (Feb 9, 2024).
“A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal
efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and
effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in
any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked
at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v.
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st
Dist. 1964)
That the Board Agents became complicit in all
criminal acts by ignoring the very issues noted in the Jurisdictional Statement
in that Helen Kim an Asian American was shocked when Petitioner articulated the
number of inconsistencies noted in the documents which demonstrated a plethora
of wrongs, she admitted, “that none of those legal arguments were considered
because they only went by what the Executive Director said but made it clear,
that the APPELLATE COURT would probably agree to his legal arguments”
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1)
General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is
an agreement to commit an unlawful act. —U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819,
537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues. -Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to
the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality. -Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe
inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest
of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time
of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending
culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
INDUCING
RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action
for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491
N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a
cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as
“fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2)
known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the
other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of
the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
Because Cook County is filled with Hateful Negroes who want to be
accepted by those judges and Politicians who don’t like or respect persons of
Color like so many caught up in this “Organized Criminal Enterprise”
and Racist Judges like Bartkowicz, Lavine and so many others of their ethnicity
are using their robes to ethnically cleanse persons of Color from society by
whatever unlawful means available, (example unlawfully Remanded Petitioner on a
Bogus warrant off of his CTA employment and forced him on welfare displacing him
from society etc. so many others are unlawfully sent to prison for three or
four decades of their lives before DNA finally exclude them) to them innocent
Colored Men are job security for the members of the Political Machine and with
a Passive Chief judge who keeps his head down and mouth shut at the mayhem in
the courts for which he doesn’t have any control over is why this matter has
languished so long unjustly in this Apartheid Legal System.
“Any judge who does not comply with his
oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution
and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is
engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of
office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution
of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the
Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully
comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without
jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
1-23-1065
FIRST DIVISION
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
)
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Petition For Review Of The Order
) Of The Illinois Labor Relations
Petitioner-Appellant ) Board State Panel
)
)
VS
)
)
ILRB Nos. L-CB-23-004
)
)
The Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel )
Lynne O. Sneed, Charles E. Anderson, Angela )
C. Thomas, Kimberly Faith Stevens, in her )
Official Capacity as Executive Director Of The )
Illinois Labor Relations Board, )
A.T.U Local 241, President Keith Hill; )
)
Respondents-Appellees )
________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF MOTION
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Plaintiff-Appellant
Moves to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District for an Order on Motion for Reconsideration and Vacate the Feb 28, 2024, Dismissal for
want of Prosecution due to Judge Terrance Lavine Obstructed Justice & acted
as a “PRIVATE CITIZEN” Denied every Motion Petitioner Filed and Ordered the Clerks
in the Appellate Court not to Accept his
Motions et al.
I have caused Courtesy Copies to be had on all of the
following via electronic service email/regular mail.
Honorable Mayor Brandon Johnson, 121 N. LaSalle (City
Hall) Chg. Il. 60602
Office of the Executive Inspector General Antoinette Kwateng
Deputy Inspector oig.referrals@illinois.gov
Illinois Labor Relations Board ilrb.filing@illinois.gov
Alexandrina Shrove AAG Civil Appeals Division Alexandrina.Shrove@ilag.gov
Cook County Sheriffs, Tom Dart CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Illinois State Police usp.contact@illinois.gov
Chief Judge Timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
Cook County States Attorney Kim Foxx statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Chief Judges Office Jaime Barcas Adm for Acting Presiding
Judge Regina Scannicchio jaime.barcas@cookcountyil.gov
Ron Willis email: rwillis@laboradvocates.com
Dowd, Bloch, Bennet, Cervone, Auerbach, & Yokich
8 S. Michigan
Chicago, Il 60603
Jodi Marr Jodi.Marr@illinois.gov
General Counsel helen.j.kim@illinois.gov
Lashonda .channel@illinois.gov
Gov Pritzker gov.goca@illinois.gov
Brianna Klein, Case Manager, Personnel
Officer &
Helen J. Kim (FOIA Officer)
Information Technology Officer Brianna.klein@illinois.gov
Assistant General Counsel
Kimberly F. Stevens, Kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov
Anna Hamburg-Gal anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov
Keith Hill President ATU 241 khill@atu241chicago.org
Said case
demonstrates within the parameter of the laws how the Illinois legal system is
under siege, as stated in earlier affidavits, the Ku Klux Klan, pursuant to the
act of 1871 Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) Remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats
belong or can belong to these societies”)
CERTIFCATE
OF SERVICE
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on March
1, 2024, A Motion for Reconsideration et al. with all attachments has been filed
before the Appellate Court of Illinois, and served on all parties in the
aforementioned Motion via email.
_________________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner-Appellant
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the
aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265
5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters
therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the
undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
1-23-1065
1-23-1065
FIRST DIVISION
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
)
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Petition For Review Of The Order
)
Of The Illinois Labor Relations
Petitioner-Appellant ) Board State Panel
)
)
VS
)
)
ILRB Nos. L-CB-23-004
)
)
The Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel )
Lynne O. Sneed, Charles E. Anderson, Angela )
C. Thomas, Kimberly Faith Stevens, in her )
Official Capacity as Executive Director Of The )
Illinois Labor Relations Board, )
A.T.U Local 241, President Keith Hill; )
)
Respondents-Appellees )
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
This matter
having come on to be heard on Motion for Reconsideration and Vacate the Feb 28,
2024 Order for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution et al. due notice having been
given, the court having jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter,
and being fully advised in the premises;
It is HEREBY
ORDERED that Petition is Granted/Denied Instanter.
ENTERED:
_________________________________
Justice
_________________________________
Justice
_________________________________
Justice
Counsel Pro
Se
_________________________________
P.O. Box 490075
Justice
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
(312) 965-6455
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment