Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Saturday, February 10, 2024

 

It took Dam near 40 years before the TRUTH finally came out the State's Attorney, Francoise Police Officer Hightower never Denied or Objected to any of the factual pleadings presented and most importantly, a SUMMARY JUDGMENT was filed and ignored seeking $50 Million Dollars.

  1. Plaintiffs have not raised any affirmative defenses.

 

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the movant or non-movant fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby    

    Entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

 

The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of fact, but simply to determine whether one exists.

 

When the party moving for summary judgment supplies evidentiary facts which, if not contradicted, would entitle her to judgment, the opposing party cannot rely upon his non-compliance to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures or a court order or a complaint or answer if submitted alone to raise issues of material fact. A counter Affidavit is necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit Supporting the motion or else the facts are deemed admitted.

The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."

 

            This statement of material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs,    including within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B). 

In the matter of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7th Cir. 2013) The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.

  

   That the Defendant has met and exceeded the burden required in  Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules, the Court instructed plaintiffs to set out each judicial proceeding complained of, allege specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or otherwise improper, and name the particular judges and other individuals involved and the extent of their involvement in each claim of "fraudulent" or otherwise improper conduct. 

That on February 9, upon filing the Default Motion, the Clerk stated that, I had a new judge!

I was happy hearing this but what that Clerk didn't realize is that somebody tried some slick illegal shit, that was passed the case to another judge pretending that the Acting Presiding Judge Regina Scannicchio authorized this transfer she did not.

These People are acting like some street thugs or gangsters now when the Sheriff's came  upstairs Friday afternoon on that Hispanic sister because the Black Cashier treated her as if she was a BLACK MAN, that is how they treat Men!

The way that Hispanic woman was treated is indicative how they treat Black Men, I have been emphatic in my pleadings in requesting anybody except a Black Person especially, a Black judge  

The Hispanic sister only wanted needed some clarity on how was her case not active when she felt that it was and all Hell broke loose, the Black woman got indignant told her to move out of her window, she requested a supervisor and a Chief Clerk but nobody showed, so another Black woman told the Black woman don't worry, they made a phone call and about 8-9 Deputies showed up after the first one ordered her to move from the window, she politely removed her papers and tried pleading her case but a white or Hispanic Deputy heard her issues.

The energy and deployment of Sheriff's summoned frivolously Friday Feb 9, afternoon is the type of energy needed removing judges and Clerks and Assistant States Attorneys involved in this Child Support Scam because if you look on the computer you will see Judge Chivira is still on the case since Jan 2, 2024 nowhere has this new judge Andrea Webber have been legally assigned.

The reason why, I am familiar with Judge Webber she is one of the Public Defenders, I remember voting for because way too many Assistant States Attorneys get on the bench not really knowing shit about the laws but locking up people of Color. 

I believe in my personal opinion Judge Chivira is dating a Black Powerful Woman and shit has gotten to be way too messy, as racist as White Men have been to me in the courts, they at least told me, I was telling the truth or simply had records deleted from the database, this is some Colored People Shit going on here.

This is amplified proof on just how CORRUPT and NEFARIOUS our government has become now that low life's have assumed prominent positions of authority.

I am appealing to everyone reading this post go to Online Case Search, Cook County Database, Domestic Relations case 1988 D 079012 Francoise Hightower v Joe Louis Lawrence----- You will see for the first time someone recorded on the database FUTURE COURT ACTIVITY 3/21/2024, POST DECREE MOTION, CALENDAR 45, JUDGE ANDREA M. WEBBER.

THE Million Dollar question is how in the Hell did the case get assigned to her? What these dumb Asses don't know is that on Thursday Feb. 8, at 1:03 pm, I was on the phone 312 603-5988 talking to Judge Scannicchio's Executive Assistant (Jaime Barcas) telling me she had been trying to contact me, I explained to her that, I replied to her Jan 31 email she couldn't find anything about me, I explained to her that, I called her twice and left voicemails and sent her emails and aske her she wanted me to send her screen shots, she denied them telling me she believed me and asked my availability for Wednesday and Thursday, I explained those days were not good how about Friday? Her rely is 11:00am good?, I said perfect, I asked her who is the judge? Her reply was she was not sure, she named about three people but I don't recall it was no Webber out of the names she mentioned.

See what these dumb Ass people don't know is a few years ago under Dorothy Brown Clerks Black Women would go in and back date a lot of shit for racist white attorneys against Black men in worse case scenarios if that was not possible they would have the cases DELETED or papers removed from the file but with this updated technology and Iris Y. Martinez at the helm, she has always been a woman of immaculate integrity when she had her office on Milwaukee down the street from My Cubano Padrino.

It's no mistake they chose another judge in the basement how's that for coincidence?    


IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

 

 

IN RE                                                              )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Iris Y. Chivira                     

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 41 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )         

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-12

 

 

 

                                     

                  MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD

                             OF $50 MILLION DOLLARS

        Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se. in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion for Default Judgment due to “Fraud” of $50 Million Dollars.

          

 

1.                That pursuant to Motions accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to said Respondent’s Petition to Zero out Child Support due to Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct et al. (filed Oct 26, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5156-4056-3301-7893- 63 delivered Oct. 28, 2023 at 2:52 pm in the mailbox.  

 

2.           That pursuant to Motions accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to said Respondent’s Re Notice Petition to Zero out Child Support due to Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct et al. (filed Nov. 15, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5103-6771-3319-6315- 97 delivered Nov 16, 2023 at 2:01pm in the mailbox.  

 

3.           That pursuant to Judge Chivira a former Assistant States Attorney tried to pretend she was not an attorney for the States Attorney used her unlawful authority and acted as a “Private Citizen” by violating the Civil Rights of the Respondent Denied said valid aforementioned Motion that was properly agreed upon by the ASA via not objecting or denying any of the Pleadings.

 

4.           That pursuant to a Summary Motion accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to said Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (filed Dec 4, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5103-6773-3338-5864- 63 delivered Dec. 6, 2023 at 11:10 am in the mailbox.  

 

5.            That pursuant to a Motion for Disqualification Instanter of Judge for Cause et al.  accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to said  Motion  (filed Dec 26, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5116-1093-3360-0084- 14 delivered Dec. 28, 2023 at 12:40 pm in the mailbox.  

 

6.           That Colored judges are promoted and Appointed on their abilities as Democrats Oppressing ethnic groups of Color hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration Vacate (Feb 5. 2024 Order) Eviction & Rule to Show Cause et al.

 

7.            That said judge of Color is following the exact Terrorist Apartheid ways of Negros Judge Freddrenna Lyle as she came behind highly qualified judges who Vacated a Foreclosure/ and  Sale of said home in 2009 and affirmed by the Appellate Court 2010 she allowed racist bank attorneys of the worse kind to still come after said home illegally making it 14 years + as judge Freddrenna Lyle allegedly was paid very well by Bank Officials and was PROMOTED to the Appellate Court for her egregious crimes on senior citizens of Color not fearing any admonishments because her crimes were on ethnic groups of her hue and not of Irish or Polish ethnicity.

 

8.            That hereto attached Gr Ex B,  4 Re Noticed Motions filed Feb. 7, 2024 demonstrating the due-diligence said Retired Senior Citizens who is having to deplete their pensions and savings fighting to keep their home as heartless judges and racism working intimately in said Diabolical Mortgage Foreclosure Criminal Conspiracy.  

A-    Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied, there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.

 

B-    Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

9.      That Defendant has due-diligently called and emailed Jaime Barcus on numerous occasions and as recently Feb 8, 2024 at 312 603-5988 (5 mins 32 sec) she stated that she had been trying to email the Defendant but he explained he only received 1 email on Jan 31, 2024 and the only email, she stated that she was trying to get a judge for Friday Feb 16, 2024 at 11:00 am Defendant agreed to that time.

 

10.  The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.     

In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.

 

This document is like Drano of a special kind eradicating years of human defecation (corruption) clogging up the Illinois court system for at least 50 years or more; 

 

ILL. App. (1st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.  

 

     

U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

 

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio,; 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

 

         Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.

         Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.

 

CONSPIRACY

Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

 

      Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

 

    Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

 

            If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions.

 

BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanctionable conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

End of de jure segregation

In January 1964, President Lyndon Johnson met with civil rights leaders. On January 8, during his first State of the Union address, Johnson asked Congress to "let this session of Congress be known as the session which did more for civil rights than the last hundred sessions combined." On June 21, civil rights workers Michael Schwerner, Andrew Goodman, and James Chaney, disappeared in Neshoba County, Mississippi. The three were volunteers aiding in the registration of African-American voters as part of the Mississippi Summer Project. Forty-four days later, the Federal Bureau of Investigation recovered their bodies, which had been buried in an earthen dam. The Neshoba County deputy sheriff, Cecil Price and 16 others, all Ku Klux Klan members, were indicted for the crimes; seven were convicted.

 A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

 

 Commentary to Canon 2 offers a test for the appearance of impropriety: “whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge’s ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired.” ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct, Commentary to Canon 2A, paragraph 2 (1990). A reference to the Commentary under 2C alerts one to the fact that the appearance of impropriety can also be created by a judge’s membership in or knowing approval of organizations that engage in invidious discrimination.

 

That because of the number of years Defendant have been harmed by said Civil Rights Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before this tribunal, Defendant is seeking $50 million dollars Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”

 

                             FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

 

 

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                    Respectfully submitted,

                                                                                       Joe Louis Lawrence

 

                                                                                  _________________________

                                                                                                                                            

   

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays:

 

1.)  For the Relief of Default Judgment   $50 Million Dollars

 

2.)  Order Remand on every party complicit in  said conspiracy Instanter;

 

3.)  Impose Sanctions on any other Parties and any other members complicit in said conspiracies;

 

4.)  Invoke any Sanctions and all remedies not mentioned this court deems just;

 

5.)  Order the Chicago Transit Authority to REINSTATE his Position back as whole due to the egregious conspiracies culminating into CHILD SUPPORT SCAM & COVER-UP as Judge Ronald Bartkowicz admitted in a Court Order of unlawfully Remanding Defendant on a Bogus Warrant as he a former CTA attorney was covering up his “Good ol Boys” Brethren who stole said wages while off work injured on duty.

 

6.)  Order Francoise to return his stimulus check of $2000 and every dime she collected from him illegally Instanter

 

   Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as afore said that he verily believes the same to be true.

 

 

                                                                                Respectfully Submitted,

 

                                                                                      Joe Louis Lawrence,

                                                                                         Counsel Pro Se         

 

 

                                                                                ______________________

 

 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

 

 

IN RE                                                              )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Iris Y. Chivira                     

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 41 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )         

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-12

 

 

 

 

                                    NOTICE OF FILING

                         MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD

                                      OF $50 Million Dollars

 

Please be advised that on Feb. 9, 2024 Defendant has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion for Default Judgment of $50 Million Dollars; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before the proper Judge who is presiding on this matter Feb     at 10:30 via Zoom.       

 

Zoom Link
Meeting ID: 84376080114
Password: 086627
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799

 

 I  Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant, certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice and Motion to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular mail/electronic delivery.

 

                Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov

To:   Hon.  Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov

  sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov 

 Francoise L.B. Hightower-Belmer 1152 West 102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353   

Cook County State’s Attorney                               Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

           Kim Foxx                                                     timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov            

 statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov        

 

                                                                   

                                                                   Cook County Sheriff’s

                                                                            Tom Dart

                                                               email CCSO@ccsheriff.org

The Crusader Newspaper Group

Managing Editor Sharon Fountain

sfountain@chicagocrusader.com

                                                        State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov 

                                                                                Illinois State Police                                            



                                                                                                          Respectfully, Submitted,

 

 

                                                                        __________________________

                                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                   Counsel Pro Se

                                                                               Post Office Box 490075

                                                                                  Chicago, Ill 60649              

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed electronically and mailed, to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on February 9, 2024.

                                                                ________________________

                                                                                    Respectfully Submitted,

                                                                         Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                      

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

 

 

IN RE                                                              )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Iris Y. Chivira                     

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 41 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )         

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-12

 

                                                                                       

 

 

 

 

                                                 AFFIDAVIT

 

STATE OF ILLINOIS )

                                        )

COUNTY OF COOK   )

 

 

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

 

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary

                                                                       

____________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

 


IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

 

 

IN RE                                                              )

                                                                         )

 Francoise Hightower                                      )        Judge Iris Y. Chivira                     

        Petitioner                                                 )

                                                                         )        Cal 41 

          VS                                                          )                                  

                                                                         )        No. 88 D 079012                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                        )         

        Respondent                                              )        Room CL-12

 

 

                                                  ORDER

 

 

       THIS CAUSE coming to be heard on Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification Instanter of judge et al. A.S.A. Tina Harris appeared in open Court on behalf of Petitioner, Court having read the Motion accompanied with Affidavit Petitioner being fully advised in the premises:

 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, DEFENDANT’S MOTION to DISQUALIFY JUDGE CHIVIRA FOR CAUSE is Granted Instanter THE COURT FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

 

  1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter.

 

  1. Defendant’s Motion to Disqualify Judge Chivira for Cause Instanter is GRANTED and the Court Order of Nov. 28, 2023 is Vacated.  

 

  1. The Ill. Dept of Healthcare and Family Services being represented by the State/ ASA Tina Harris appearing and not Objecting/Denying any of the merits of Defendant’s Motion accompanied with Affidavit

 

  1. That on allegations of the Motion of other parties complicit in an alleged Criminal Enterprise Conspiracy: It is Ordered:  That the Attorney Registration & Disciplinarian Commission to invoke jurisdiction and Investigate Assistant States Attorney and any and all other Attorneys in this matter and the Judicial Inquiry Board to investigate matters involving Judge Chivira and any other judges complicit in these egregious sinister acts.

 

  1. That because the Petitioner and allegations of her being a Police Officer and Respondent having been Remanded into Custody 5 times on allegations of child support:

 

A-    It is Ordered: The Attorney General Kwame Raoul and State Executive Inspector General Diane Saltoun, States Attorney Kim Foxx shall investigate all parties and bring them to justice everyone involved.

 

B-    It is Ordered: Explain in specific detail when the Respondent was found to be the father or if not, any DNA/Paternity tests, the method of service had bringing him before the court’s jurisdiction.

 

C-    It is Ordered: Explain how is it the State Child Support Enforcement Agency began representing a Police Officer and arrearage orders having been set; whereby, Tycee Laqita Hightower was an adult and no records of her initiating any actions against the Respondent ( alleged father).

 

D-    It is Ordered: That because of the egregious allegations of Assistant States Attorney Tina Harris involvement as an Officer of the Court and not bringing to the courts attention she is BARRED from practicing law in the Domestic Relations Division, until an investigation is completed determining her fate in this matter.  

 

E-    It is Ordered: That a forensic accountant ascertain how much money Petitioner (Francoise Hightower) collected from the Respondent from all of his employers make sure that the CTA records show the beginning until the end.

 

F-     It is Ordered: That Director of the State Police  Brendan F. Kelly investigate and ascertain how a Chicago Police Officer managed to use her Police authority and have a State Agency Child Support Enforcement to act as her Private Attorney involving many State employees in this alleged Criminal Enterprise.

 

  1. It is Ordered: That Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment (filed Dec 4, 2023) seeking $50 Million Dollars and Petition to Zero out child support due to  Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct et al  (filed Oct 26, 2023)  shall be set by the next judge whom random selection of a judge via the Clerks office can be gleaned and assigned to determine the Hearing on both Motions unabated.

 

  1. It is Ordered: That upon the signing date of this order all parties shall have 30 days from that date to comply and present its finding before the next court date.

 

 

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT ORDER IS PUNISHABLE WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT AND CAN/WILL BE REMANDED IN CUSTODY UP TO 30 DAYS AND FINED

“No one is above the Law”,  citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),

“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."    

     

ORDERED PREPARED BY:

                         

 Joe Louis Lawrence

 Counsel Pro Se

 Post Office Box 490075

 Chicago, Ill 60649

  312 965-6455

 

Joelouis565@yahoo.com              

 

 

 

 

 

ENTERED:

 

 

 

 

_________________________

Judge

 

 

 

 

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD OF $50 MILLION DOLLARS

Inbox

cookcountylawlibrary@gmail.com

AttachmentsFri, Feb 9, 12:57 PM (1 day ago)
to CCC.DomRelCRCL06sao.csedstatesattorneytimothy.evansgov.caseworkjimmie.smithmarkcasemanagementclearpathoig.referralsjoelouis565governorsofficeCCSOisp.contactsfountainPirahana1frogishtwo65


Hello,
The attachment is the image(s) scanned by ScanEZ Station.
Thank you. 
One attachment • Scanned by Gmail

No comments:

Post a Comment