HOW BLACK JUDGES SOLD OUT TO RACISM AND IS TAKING PART IN STEALING BLACK SENIOR CITIZENS HOMES THEIR MENTALITY AS LONG AS THEY ARE NOT TAKING FROM THE IRISH OR POLISH ETHNIC GROUPS THEIR CRIMES ON COLORED PEOPLE WILL BE EXCUSED

HERE IS A BLACK JUDGE IN TRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST GOT EVERYBODY FOOLED REV MOSS WILL BE SHOCKED LEARNING HOW THE DEVIL IS BLACKIN THE HOUSE OF THE LORD DESTROYING VULNERABLE HELPLESS SENIORS OR IS TRYING TO IN THIS CASE.

WE NEED FEDERAL AGENTS AND BLACKS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THESE SLAVE MINDED INFERIOR PLANTATION BLACKS TO CLEAN UP AND REMOVE ALL OF THESE WORTHLESS COLORED PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY. 

 RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION & VACATE (Feb 5, 2024 Order) EVICTION & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES w/BODY ATTACHMENT et al.

Inbox

Search for all messages with label Inbox

Remove label Inbox from this conversation

cookcountylawlibrary@gmail.com	12:55 PM (11 hours ago)
to ccc.mfmlcalendar56, ccc.mfmlcalendar12, timothy.evans, CCSO, jsc.general, RPerdew, simon.feng, pmal, statesattorney, courtclerk, Pirahana1, frogishtwo65

                           IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

 

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under )

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               ) 2008 ch 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                         Petitioner                                           )

                                                                                         )          

V.                                                                                      ) Judge James T. Derico

                                                                                        )                                                                                                  ) Room 2804     

                                                                               )

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                    )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia                    )      Cal 56                          Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                      ( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                               )

                            Respondents  )

                                                                                                                                    

RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION & VACATE (Feb 5, 2024 Order) EVICTION & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES w/BODY ATTACHMENT (AS PRIVATE CITIZENS) COMPLICIT IN THIS ORGANIZED MORTGAGE FRAUD CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY INSTANTER, PRESIDING JUDGE GILLESPIE VACATED FORECLOSURE/SALE IN 2009/APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMED RULING DEC. 30, 2011, JUSTICE WAS OBSTRUCTED PLAINTIFF’S HAVING ADMITTED TO ALL PLEADINGS NEVER DENIED ITS VERACITY AND CASE LEFT IN LIMBO AS ALL PARTIES IN AUTHORITY PROPERLY NOTIFIED IGNORED ALL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OF JUDGE LYLE SIGNING NUMEROUS UNLAWFUL ORDERS FOR THE PLAINTIFFS & TRESPASSED UPON THE LAWS AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” AND WAS PROMOTED TO THE APPELLATE COURT DUE TO HER CRIMINAL ACTS ON BLACK SENIOR CITIZENS IN MORTGAGE FRAUD HELPING US BANK ATTORNEYS STEAL THEIR HOME /BLACK OFFICIALS & BLACK PRESIDING JUDGE DIDN’T EXERCISE JURISDICTION KEPT THEIR HEADS DOWN AND STAFF ATTORNEY SUBMITTED EMAIL ATTESTING TO THIS VERACITY WITH /AFFIDAVIT

   Now comes Respondent, Monzella Y. Johnson et al. being represented Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration et al;

 

1.)    Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;

 

2.)    The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.

 

3.)    Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

 

4.)    Defendant appeared before Judge Derico who called someone on Zoom to see who was going to be the attorney on the call regarding said motion but never recorded the name of the attorney allegedly representing US Bank which yielded the impression he was a De facto attorney for US bank.

A-    That Defendant particularized in specific detail of the Respondent’ Emergency Motion et al. Page 2-3 Pars A-D unequivocally articulates continuity and due-diligence of systemic corruption and fraud in the courts.

 

B-    That upon reading the court order and learning judge Derico failed to identify the specific documents, and brought it to his Law Clerks attention David, he went and explained it to the judge and judge Derico stated he was not changing anything, hereto attached, Caucasian Presiding Judge Pamela H. Gillespie VACATING FORECLOSURE/SALE JUNE 2009, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, 9 PAGES proving Black judges are the worse people to go before for any justice as so  many are going along to get along with racism and terrorism within the Democratic Political Machine and are being appointed and elevated based upon their abilities oppressing their own ethnic groups.

 

C-    That hereto attached First District Appellate Court Judges, Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr. James R. Epstein and Joseph Gordon AFFIRMED Judge Gillespie’s Court Decision, Dec 30, 2011.

 

D-    That judge Derico never had his Clerk to go into the computer verify the Defendants arguments before him but he left the bench and allegedly went to speak to someone and came back defensively when Marcia explained how is it, he doesn’t have jurisdiction after 30 days and judge Lyle has entered orders years after Judge Gillespie and where the Appellate Court Affirmed Vacating, Judge asked her did she Vacate part of the foreclosure or everything? Her reply, she VACATED everything.

 

E-     Judge Derico was noticeably agitated behind her response as if he was lied to and was carrying a drive by type of chip against the senior citizens when in fact, they are being the victims of Black Hate in authority and racist bank attorneys trying to steal their home.

 

F-     That Defendant called the Clerk David to ascertain the earliest Court date to present said Motion as an Emergency, the Clerk had to speak with the judge, Judge Derico refused to hear the Motion as an Emergency said for them to file it normally with the Clerk’s office.

 

G-    That said EGREGIOUS CALLOUS disposition towards senior citizens fighting to remain in their home from an OVERT ACT of Mortgage Fraud is no different from a thug in the streets carjacking and robbing them and shooting them even though they have complied with the criminals.

 

H-    Judge Derico is hoping that the Cook County Sheriffs EVICT the Defendants UNLAWFULLY in the hopes of saving all of the “Private Citizens” involved in this “Organized Criminal Mortgage Fraud Conspiracy”

The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.   

5.)    That Judge Derico demonstrated a prima facie bias against Caucasian Male attorneys versus Senior Citizen Female Pro se litigants sharing his ethnicity; in that he told the Caucasian Male Attorney, that he didn’t think he had jurisdiction on his case who was on the Zoom call and requested that he present legal citations on how he has jurisdiction but when the senior citizens requested that they be allowed to come back and show how he had jurisdiction, he said No and further stated that he was not staying no EVICTION of the COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS coming to illegally EVICT them from their home of over 60 years.

A-    Judge Derico had a court order prepared and did not prepare it correctly, he did not identify who the attorney was of US Bank;

 

B-    Judge Derico stated that Defendants did not properly timely file a response to the March 15, 2022 Court order which prompted the Eviction Papers in how this matter made it to court

 

C-    Judge Derico failed to properly identify the correct documents of what the Defendant’s filed in said matter;

 

D-    Respondent filed a Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Report of Sale (Court Order Being Void/ A Nullity) And Distribution, Confirming Sale and Eviction Order, And for a Personal Deficiency Judgment, Order Finding Personal Deficiency Due to Judge Lyle & Other Attorneys/Judges Complicit in a Criminal Enterprise of Mortgage Fraud Affidavit of PHH Mortgage Corp. Corroborating Their Involvement Stealing Home Warranting A Rule to Show Cause Remanding All Parties Instanter Into Custody w/ Body Attachment & Disqualifying Judge Lyle Instanter  (April 25, 2022) in the  Circuit Court of Cook County detailing a Plethora of Criminal Enterprise Actions.

 

E-     That Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Monzella Y. Johnson’s Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Sale (Court Order Being a Void/Nullity) And Distribution et al. (Interpreted as a Motion To Vacate The Order Approving Sale For Not Receiving Notice) (filed June 24, 2022)

 

F-     That Respondent knowing that the Plaintiffs were not going to file any reply or comply with judge Lyle’s court order, so Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion Pursuant to all State of Illinois and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit seeking $33 Million Dollars for the number of years they have been frivolously before the courts FRAUDULENTLY 14 YEARS (Filed June 2, 2022).

 

G-   RESPONDENT’S REPLY MOTION STRIKING PETITIONER’S RESPONSE MOTION TO MONZELLA Y. JOHNSON’S MOTION STRIKING/OBJECTING APPROVING SALE (COURT ORDER BEING A VOID/NULLITY) AND DISTRIBUTION ET AL. (INTERPRETED AS A MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER APPROVING SALE FOR NOT RECEIVING NOTICE-WARRANTING A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES & DISQUALIFYING JUDGE LYLE INSTANTER w/AFFIDAVIT (filed June 30, 2022).

6.    That judge Derico demonstrated an unknown interest  in this matter which has blinded his objectivity in adjudicating the merits of this matter, due to the aforementioned; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1) (d) mandates disqualification where the judge has an interest in the proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).

 

7.      That judge Derico indicated in his Order that (1) “The Order Approving Sale in this case was entered on March 15, 2022. The Defendants filed a Motion on April 25, 2022 seeking to Vacate the March 15, 2022 Order” See Par C of Page 2, “It appears that Motion was not heard”. However, Defendants filed a subsequent motion on or about August 29, 2022 seeking relief from the March 15, 2022 Order and additional relief.” THIS IS AN EGREGIOUS FALSEHOOD, See Pars D-F.

 

a.       To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9^th Cir. 1989);

 

b.      A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

 

  Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al

 

8.      That judge Derico was not clear in identifying the Motion, RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR PRESIDING JUDGE (SOPHIA HALL) TO INVOKE JURISDICTION DUE TO JUDGE LYLE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE/TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS/ENGAGING IN CRIMINAL ACTS USING HER ROBE TO HELP RACIST BANK ATTORNEYS STEAL HOMES IN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES w/AFFIDAVIT (Filed Aug. 29, 2022).

 

Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 6

 

1.       That Plaintiff’s has demonstrated beyond the Preponderance of Evidence that said acts demonstrates how Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigan (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).       

 

A-    That judge Derico is co-founder of the Trinity Legal Clinic and is an active member of the church, Trinity United Church of Christ, where he served as a mentor through the  Project Jeremiah Ministry program.

 

B-    The motto of Trinitarians is that they are unapologetic Christian and  unapologetic unashamedly Black.

 

C-    Judge Derico heard the pleas of the Defendants describing the racist diabolical horrendous crimes of racist bank attorneys and Black judges keeping their heads down and mouths shut while they allow banks illegally steal Black people’s homes but said judge wanting to be accepted made it clear he has no jurisdiction to stay an eviction (lament terms stopping the eviction).

 

D-    Judge Derico was appointed to Calendar 56 to continue ignoring the racist acts of white bank attorneys stealing People of Color homes by and continuously covering -up all crimes with the possibility of being elevated to the Appellate Court in how Fredrenna Lyle received her position.

 

E-    That Judge Derico demonstrated an unknown interest in this matter and was more concerned telling the Defendant Monzella Johnson what she did not do as to why the March 15, 2022 Court Order is how the Eviction Papers derived, in that she countered emphatically with her cane that they filed an Objection/Striking Ref as Gr Ex A.

 

F-     That no Senior Citizen especially Black women  ever appear before this judge under any circumstances, he has a callous temperament but is very nice to white attorneys.

 

9.       That Par C Ex A is being Re Noticed Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Report of Sale (Court Order Being Void/ A Nullity) And Distribution, Confirming Sale and Eviction Order et al.

                                              Pages 3-4 of the aforementioned Par 9

1.)  That the entire data base under Cook County Clerk Iris Y. Martinez (not implying she had anything to do with this Criminal Conspiracy) has been altered removing all attorneys involved but recorded Larson and Associates in all entries;

A-   That Judge Lyle used her skin color as a Negro woman to aid and assist in all Terrorist Conspiracies in helping out all racist parties including other judges associated with U.S. Bank in helping them try and steal said home because said women were elderly and non-white; said judge acted as if because she had no jurisdiction to enter orders against the Respondent, one can easily infer that all racist personnel would assist her if an investigation was had dismissing any wrong doing on her part because she was helping them.

 

B-   That because Lyle acted as a “Private Citizen” assuming arguendo that said Respondent was elderly and non-white nobody would care about how her civil Rights were being desecrated in the Illinois courts making it clear, “THAT BLACK AND BROWN LIVES REALLY DON’T MATTER” in Chicago, Illinois.  

 

C-   Lyle realizing no Anglo-Saxon controlling her would admonish her for violating the Civil Rights of Colored People demonstrated her amplified role as a co-conspirator to all Terrorist Acts by VACATING THE SALE OF RESPONDENT’S HOME et al, (Oct. 29, 2018) for the same Plaintiff’s “TRESPASSED UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGED IN TREASON OFFENSES, (MAY 5, 2021) ENTERED AN ORDER 2 YEARS SEVEN MONTHS LATER TO U.S. BANK;

 

D-   Prior on June 10, 2010, Circuit Court Judge Gillespie VACATED the JUDGEMENT OF FORECLOSURE for lack of proper affidavit in support et al. hereto attached. US Bank never ever presented an Affidavit nor did they seek to challenge the judge’s ruling.

 

E-   Lyle and Postestivo engaged in diabolical Terrorists Acts as they committed a plethora of felonies making a mockery out of the courts and States Attorney, Attorney Generals offices Inducing Reliance on everyone trying to undermine the integrity of Respondent’s legal claims properly presented to the courts.

 

F-   Page 1 of the March 15, 2022 court order, states “That all notices required by 735 ILCS 5/15-1507(c) were given is a “LIE” Defendant received the Order Friday April 22, 2022 said envelope from Potestivo  & Associates envelope reflects it was mailed April 20, 2022 from Rochester Michigan, hereto attached

 

G-    Page 3 of the order states, “The Movant shall mail a copy of this Order within 7 days to the last known address of the Mortgagor,” Order was not received until 31 days from the 7 days on which was stated on the court order, “Private Citizen” Lyle acted like the THUGS from her neighborhood where she was the Alderman as they are CAR JACKING and KILLING she is using her ROBE and vicious Judicial authority (as a THUG IN A ROBE) to help racist ANGLO-SAXONS HOUSE-JACK the homes from individuals who share her same skin color (sic) INDUCING RELIANCE

To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

 

     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

H-   That all judges acted as a “Private Citizens” they never had jurisdiction on the Respondent to compel her house to be sold or have any adverse rulings against her in any legal capacity, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)

 

I-     Lyle used her robe as a Halloween costume pretending to be a person, she was never sworn to be while sitting on the bench because she never had jurisdiction on said matter, there are a plethora of other judges on the bench just like her former Alderman Burke appointed and allegedly sold a lot of judges’ positions to THUGS and RACIST LIKE HER;

 

J-    “Private Citizen” Lyle entertained a Motion filed in the database  (Feb 24, 2022) with no Notice recorded to inform Respondent of what was going on in the courts; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1) (d) mandates disqualification where the judge has an interest in the proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).

 

K-   “Private Citizen” Lyle has had a vendetta against said Respondent’s for a long time because they not only DEFEATED every bank attorney but out argued them as well ( EXTREMELY ARTICULATE) but Lyle would interject saying, she is the judge wearing the robe and told the Defendant’s that they need to stop listening to people with no law degrees reading the internet, but asked the Respondents for a copy of their argument they were articulating from but later told them that their pleadings don’t make sense.(Court Transcripts would reflect she never should have been a judge)

 

10.  That judge Derico’s Court Order states, On September 23, 2022, this Court ruled that it no longer had jurisdiction to rule on the matter so the Motion (s) were stricken, but Defendant filed a timely Motion RESPONDENT’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE (September 23rd 2022) ORDER DUE TO “MORTGAGE FRAUD” “CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE CONSPIRACY” “RULE TO SHOW CAUSE” WARRANTING THE STATE POLICE TO REMAND “PRIVATE CITIZEN FREDRENNA LYLE AND ALL ATTORNEYS COMPLICIT IN THIS “ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY W/ BODY ATTACHEMENT INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER w/AFFIDAVIT (Filed Sept. 29, 2022)

 

11.  That the September 23, 2022 COURT ORDER is VOID A NULLITY and judge Derico is obviously without a scintilla of falsity is allegedly academically far smarter than Fredrenna Lyle, but either has everyone fooled and is going along not reading the material thinking he will receive favor and be accepted.

 

12.  That if Judge Derico was to ignore and attempt to go along with everything “Private Citizen” Lyle did makes him now a co-conspirator to this Mortgage Foreclosure Criminal Conspiracy---EACH BLACK JUDGE FAILS TO REALIZE, that all BANK ATTORNEYS HAVE ADMITTED TO ALL CRIMES.   

 

13.  That every court order judge Lyle has signed is that of a NULLITY/VOID it has as much value as yesterday’s toilet paper from a person have loose bowels caught up in this mess not being able to hold it not even with a diaper.

                   Pages 1-3 A-F of the aforementioned Motion will be Re Noticed because Judge Lyle acted as a “Private Citizen” used her robe Obstructing justice making sure she protected US Bank attorneys et al. As Ex E

 

That on June 3, 2010 Hon Pamela H. Gillespie VACATED THE FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT AND SALE OF SAID PROPERTY, with a nine-page MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

 

That many Caucasian attorneys were in fact RACIST resented what Judge Gillespie did so while in the Appellate Court documents came up missing, they  were never notified of hearing dates, lawyers appeared before certain judges and had their Appeals Dismissed under other case numbers, Certain Clerks who was helping them of Color where later terminated.

 

That Defendant filed an Appeal with due-diligence trying emphatically to save their family home and was before another group of judges and the APPELLATE COURT- AFFIRMED Judge Gillespie’s Court Order, Dec 13, 2011, Judges Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., Joseph Gordon, James R. Epstein.

 

A-    That “Private Citizen” Freddrenna Lyle used her robe to unlawfully engage in a plethora of criminal acts by unlawfully by signing off on court orders where she repeatedly  violated her oaths and Canon Ethics by using her judicial authority to help steal homes in the guise as illegal foreclosures.

 

B-    FACT: Freddrenna Lyle has on numerous occasions justified her criminal actions  citing she had judicial discretion, in that on March 15, 2022, she signed a UNLAWFUL court order attempting an ILLEGAL SALE, thereby CORROBORRATING her role as an active conspirator validating being REMANDED by the STATE POLICE into custody Instanter;

 

C-    FACT: That Freddrenna Lyle entertained Respondent’s Motion Striking/Objecting et al (filed April 25, 2022) and Summary Judgment et al. (filed June 2, 2022)

A-    That on June 21, 2022, hereto attached, Briefing Schedule Order, said judge is trying to pretend said Hearing never took place only the actual court order endorsed is in the record.

 

B-    That pursuant to the above-mentioned Court Order, Potestivo & Assocs. Via Bryan H. Thompson filed a frivolous Reply as compliance to the unlawful Court Order.

 

C-    Plaintiff filed their Reply Plaintiff’ Response to Monzella Y. Johnson et al. June 24, 2022 four days before the due date of June 28, 2022.

 

D-    Respondent answered and their Response was (filed June 30, 2022) twelve days before the due date of July 12, 2022,

 

E-     Lyle is making it clear to everyone reading this document as long as her crimes are perpetrated on Black or Brown parties nobody in the Democratic Machine is going to admonish or prosecute her because BLACKLIVESDONTMATTER to SENIORS OR ANYONE STANDING UP TO THE POLITICAL MACHINE, this is how Anglo-Saxons or other alleged “White Nationalists” Banks profit off Black and Brown people in prolonged frivolous litigations wearing them down financially.

 

D-    That because the law firm admitted to the veracity of all assertions recorded in their pleadings and nobody attempted to defend Judge Lyle in any manner prompted her to further advance her crimes in said criminal conspiracies by STRIKING the August 3, 2022 Hearing at 11 am.

 

E-      That Freddrenna Lyle continued the matter to August 5, at 10:30 am and never at any time announced she had no jurisdiction, Respondent had to file a Motion for Presiding Judge Sophia Hall who is a member of the Judicial Council, Lyle has every Black judge afraid of her so a Caucasian or Hispanic person outside of Cook County have to preside over this case because the Blacks have CORROBORRATED their impotent authority over alleged White Nationalists, or Political Elites connected to the Political Machine.

 

F-     That Plaintiffs having admitted to all facts recorded in said Respondent’s pleadings Lyle used her judicial robe to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and aid and abet with the lawyers at Potestivo law firm by unlawfully granting them every court order they have requested .

 

14.   That Par D, Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Monzella Y. Johnson’s Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Sale (Court Order Being a Void/Nullity)  is Plaintiff’s  admission to all of Defendant’s Pleadings, they never DENIED or OBJECTED to any off the properly asserted pleadings accompanied with an Affidavit. Hereto attached as Gr Ex F

 

15.  That Par E is being Re Noticed,  Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion Pursuant to all State of Illinois and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit seeking $33 Million Dollars for the number of years they have been frivolously before the courts FRAUDULENTLY 14 YEARS. Hereto attached as Gr Ex C

                 That Pages 2-3 unequivocally articulates veracity and the rules governing the ignoring a Summary Judgment and how a Party admits to all Pleadings by failing to respond.

 

“Cook County Judges have been Indicted and Convicted for Corruption and “Fixing” cases in Greylord but Political Machine Judges are ignoring the crimes due to Defendant being female African Americans complaining not an Anglo-Saxon person complaining of their home being illegally foreclosed upon.,  

 

A-    That  because of Judge Lyle’s involvement and other prominent corrupt attorneys intertwined in said Domestic Terrorist Conspiracy said Judge used her position and authority making sure no HEARING was had May 16, 2022 at 10:30 am.

 

B-    That Plaintiffs hired several multi- million-dollar law firms trying to save them and the end result was the same even with so many individuals engaging in Terrorist Acts, they have admitted to every PLEADING in Gr Ex A.

 

That Channel 2 Dorothy Tucker bravely exposed the mismanagement and unethical practices of a BLACK BANK Complaints mount against practices at Chicago's last Black-owned bank

46,339 views May 26, 2022 GN Bank stands alone in Illinois as the last Black-owned bank in the state, but it stands out for other reasons too. Customers are complaining about problems they're having with the bank. CBS 2 Investigator Dorothy Tucker reports.

C-    GN Bank https://youtu.be/qLPXBhQD_B8

 

D-    The Media has demonstrated an obvious Disparate media coverage based on the ethnicity of the offenders, where banking officials are concerned, or other irregularities, illegal foreclosures etc. or crimes of judges protecting these white banks as they are destroying the Colored Communities in the same manner as the aforementioned bank are concerned no reporter ever investigated or questioned the numerous unlawful acts noted for the last 14 years due to the ethnicity of the parties involved fighting corrupt Politically connected Anglo-Saxon banks.

 

E-    That not since 1919 the famous race riot in Chicago where violence was perpetrated on Black People and the Police aided the rioters against the Blacks as their homes were BOMBED and DESTROYED #JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases:  THE HATE AND VIOLENCE ON COLORED PEOPLE ARE BEING... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2022/05/hate-and-violence-on-colored-people-are.html?spref=tw

 

F-     That same HATE is still being practiced and ENFORCED even with Black Judges or Mayors they are IMPOTENT in authority as many can see the violence and racism has not changed with Colored People in authority it is still worse in this era Hateful White and Black Judges are working against any person color seeking justice in this RACIST CITY.

  

G-     The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."

 

            This statement of material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs,    including within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

 

In the matter of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7^th Cir. 2013) )  The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.

 

16.  That Par F is being Re Noticed Respondent’s Reply Motion Striking Petitioner’s Response Motion To Monzella Y. Johnson’s Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Sale (Court Order Being A Void/Nullity) And Distribution et al.  Hereto attached as Gr Ex D

                     That Pars 4-10 of Pages 14-16 of the aforementioned concur and validate the veracity of how Black judges act as “Private Citizens” trying to save corrupt white attorneys.

 

4.)    That attorney Bryan G. Thompson is attempting to do what attorney Alexander B. Potestivo could not do and refused to get involved; moreover, Potestivo’ top litigator Artapong Sriratana allegedly left the firm and what Mal Poulami wisely stepped back from completing, but it is a little too late, that is continue to engage in Terrorist Fraudulent Acts of Mortgage Fraud thinking Lyle can protect them.

 

5.)    That allegedly ASSOCIATE JUDGE FREDRENNA LYLE was originally assigned to Calendar 56 because no Caucasian Judge was going to attempt to ENGAGE in ACTS of FRAUD for US BANK or any of its parties in unlawfully foreclosing on the Johnson sister’s home;

 

a.       That only certain Negroes and or Racist Judges are willing to do whatever it takes to DESTROY and or VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS of any COLORED PERSON to ascend to any endeavor via Judgeship of permanence or Political aspirations.

 

b.      The evidence in all affidavits corroborate and demonstrate unequivocally that Blacks in authority and alleged power are mere figureheads and are on the front-line as soldiers protecting CORRUPT/RACIST Anglo-Saxons by going along with whatever, they are told to do not FEARING THE FBI or any type of legal retribution, due to their crimes being perpetrated on persons of Color.

 

6.)    That on June 3, 2010 Hon Pamela H. Gillespie VACATED THE FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT AND SALE OF SAID PROPERTY, hereto attached Gr Ex A, nine-page MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

 

7.)    That many Caucasian attorneys were in fact RACIST resented what Judge Gillespie did so while in the Appellate Court documents came up missing, they  were never notified of hearing dates, lawyers appeared before certain judges and had their Appeals Dismissed under other case numbers, Certain Clerks who was helping them of Color where later terminated.

 

8.)    That Defendant filed an Appeal with due-diligence trying emphatically to save their family home and was before another group of judges and the APPELLATE COURT- AFFIRMED Judge Gillespie’s Court Order, hereto attached, Gr Ex B August 30, 2012, Judges Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., Joseph Gordon, James R. Epstein.

 

9.)    “Private Citizen Lyle” is singlehandedly demonstrating how BLACK JUDGES like her are willing to DESECRATE any laws destroying their own ethnic groups so as to be accepted by the Political Machine in destroying any Black or Colored person to aid in the destroying of said communities helping Banks or any Racist Personnel destroy persons of color.

 

10.)    That pursuant to Gr Ex C as it relates to Page 20, Par 28 of the Motion Striking et al. COOK COUNTY JUDGE Ronald Bartkowicz ascended to Power in the Law Division by DESTROYING an INNOCENT MAN’S life by ISSUING AN UNLAWFUL WARRANT on a CTA Bus Operator so as to save other RACIST PERSONNEL from being caught stealing his wages while off work-injured on duty at the CTA

a.       Judge Ronald Bartkowicz ADMITTED his role against the INNOCENT PLAINTIFF AS HE SIGNED A COURT ORDER RECUSING HIMSELF FROM THE MATTER SEE SAID MOTION with his initials confirming it was him.

 

b.      That same Plaintiff is legally HOMELESS and DISPLACED FROM GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT LIVING ON WELFARE corroborating with veracity the necessary evils RACIST HATEFUL MEN AND WOMEN in the POLITICAL MACHINE are willing to do in DESTROYING a person of COLOR VIA ELDERLY, CHILDREN ETC as other BLACKS KEEP THEIR mouths shut by participating in all unlawful acts.

 

c.       Because Cook County is filled with Hateful Negroes like Lyle and Racist Judges like Bartkowicz and a Passive Chief judge who keeps his head down and mouth shut at the mayhem controlling the courts for which he doesn’t have any control over is why this matter has languished so long unjustly.

  

  “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”     

 

17.  That all parties acted as “PRIVATE CITIZENS” and engaged in numerous “TREASON OFFENSES”, “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” as Judge Lyle aided and abetted in numerous crimes using her robe trying to help said Plaintiffs try and HOUSE JACK/STEAL SAID home in an ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE.

 

Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million Jury Verdict Against City in Shooting Incident

  Wednesday, February 24, 2021    Julie Tappendorf

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7 million in damages relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.

According to the court opinion, the plaintiff claimed that a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an argument when the two had been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain and other injuries. The friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the shooting, arguing that the City was responsible for the officer's conduct. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that the City's failure to have an "early warning system" to identify officers who might engage in misconduct, failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers who engage in misconduct, and the "code of silence" among police officers contributed to the shooting incident. The City argued that the officer was off duty and not acting under "color of state law" at the time of the shooting, so the City was not liable under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. The case made its way to a jury which found the City of Chicago liable and awarded $44.7 million in damages to the plaintiff. The jury found that two of the City's policies - its failure to maintain an adequate early warning system and failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers - caused the officer to shoot his friend. 

The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer. The Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's federal rights were violated, the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict against the City of Chicago.