Mon, Feb 8 at 1:54 PMOFFICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ALLEGED CORRUPTION AND RACISM IN THE ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONDear Professor Ken:This may seem like a cliché complaining that racism is in so many areas of Chicago courts or State agencies which seems to be falling on deaf ears because many have assumed, that Black Negroes are in effective positions and things have changed, this is false and many have been into believing having Black and Brown appointees or elected to aspiring positions, this is not true if they have accepted their positions to become figure heads.Let me explain a Black history FACT, from case 02-045727, I sustained a work-related injury where my rotator was torn falling off a truck, by holding on to the left side of the rail of the truck breaking my fall as, I pulled my self back up that hurt like hell.Because of the color of my skin, I never received any workman's compensation but my workman's compensation checks were going to someone else, so I had to get on Public Aid with then my wife and five children.Now my attorney David Martay was suing IBC/wonder bread for $225,000.00, I learned that he falsified documents, that, I had no children and returned to work and while on Public Aid a subrogation Notice went out to them for them to reimburse the State for the costs the paid for my surgery and what is deep is that somehow Judge Murphy the crooked Judge in the bogus paternity case had me REMANDED into custody to keep me from testifying in my behalf, my status as then a wonder bread employee and all of the racist shit endured at the company.Paperwork was provided, that they settled with me $40,000.00 which, I never seen or received, keep in mind many numerous complaints were filed complaining about my workman's compensation checks were being sent to someone else, it fell on deaf ears what is is even more egregious is the fact, I was in court for ALLEGEDLY OWING $29, 100.00 for child support never owed, the money was never taken to free me from the heinous racist acts perpetrated at me by members, I have always felt were KU KLUX KLAN in the courts and state agencies.Pull this case up you will see how they have falsified additional information saying, I was off work 26 weeks and received $40,000.00, I never returned to work and was on Public Aid and still on welfare to this date.Another Black History FACT corroborating that Black and Brown persons are not viewed as EQUAL CITIZENS of the UNITED STATES as an employee with the Chicago Transit Authority, case 90 WC 011862, while standing still picking up a passenger, a Police Officer DRUNK as HELL getting off work totaled his van on the rear of my bumper causing me to move forward in my seat, I didn't think anything about it, until, I got off the bus going to the emergency the pain was slowly kicking in.I was off work from Feb 8, 1990 and returned to work Dec 1, 1994, CTA provided me documents told me to fabricate the events in how my injury was sustained told me to apply for the Public Aid medical card to absorb the costs of the injury, I had a lodge Brother from Prince Hall, Jachin 133 who was a manager over Public Aid and was very close to Judge Charles Freeman as the Secretary he took the dues from all Brothers in this State; He advised me not to do that shit, said CTA is trying to Fuck You don't do that, which, wasn't planning on doing.I filed a Discrimination Complaint with the State of Illinois Dennis Powell was the Intake Specialist, CTA admitted Discriminating against me and said that they didn't file appeals against white employees and certain Hispanics, see I had inside information from Caucasians who didn't like what the CTA was doing to me, those son of Bitches allegedly, paid my former attorney $10,000.00 as a pay off to misrepresent me this came from a non-white attorney Asian American, so I always kept a running journal of all inconsistencies he left the big name law firm, that is always on tv, I won't throw them under the bus.Because of the color of my skin, I have never received workman's compensation in a normal manner even when the Arbitrator ruled in my favor CTA waited almost two years to give me the very compensation ordered 8/29/1991 to pay me for 38 weeks, they appealed and in 9/29/1993 the Commissioner on review ruled in my favor they still did not pay me until around August 1994.I had to self- represent myself they paid the law firm more money than to provide me what, I was legally entitled to Querry & Harow.Still to this date Black and Brown persons are still not able to receive WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION EQUALLY as ANGLO SAXON CITIZENSTake Notice of the following case of Teresa Collins in how State employees, Attorneys, Arbitrators are still engaging in JIM CROW LAWS as INSURRECTIONISTS destroying the lives of Black and Brown persons profiting off their miseries and injustices.Good Morning Your Honor:
Feb. 8, 2021
Please find an email response to attorney Rachael’s misinformation provided to you Jan 22, 2021.
1.) I have filed Petitioners Motion for Disqualification of Arbitrator (that being you) due to “Fraud” Objection to Counsel Receiving any Legal Fees due to Corroboration of a Criminal Conspiracy Requesting State/Federal Investigation of all Parties Instanter w/ Affidavit, which is file stamped November 9, 2020.
Opposing Counsel purportedly presented a document emailed and mailed to my attention Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss case number 19 WC 13788 November 11, 2020 the attachment in the motion was a Notice of Motion and Order without any file stamp and a blank Request for Hearing document.
2.) I responded with Petitioners Motion Objecting & Striking Respondent’s Motion for Dismissal due to Admissions by the Respondent not Impeaching or Denying or Submitting a Counter-Affidavit & Summary Judgment.
3.) The aforementioned Motion was in fact signed in at the Illinois Industrial Commission on the 8th floor November 19, 2020 at 11:10 am at the IWCC register which was a Thursday.
4.) On Monday the document was retrieved for a file-stamp November 23, 2020 and learned that a Letter from the Chairman had placed a letter on my document dated Nov 19, 2020 and 11/12/2020 8:00pm it appeared someone erred on the Chairman’s letter recording Nov 12, 2020
5.) Because this letter from Chairman Brennan states, “Because of Covid and in accord with our Rules we have temporarily abandoned the requirement that a purple ink Commission stamp be affixed to all Motions and Petitions for documents filed when I filed my Motion Objecting & Striking Respondent’s Motion for Dismissal.
6.) Nevertheless, for the record, the aforementioned Motion was filed long before Rachael is asserting that you have before you a Martay’s Motion seeking legal fees
7.) RESPONDENT’S MOTION IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S MOTION SEEKING THE DISQUALIFICATION OF THE ARBITRATOR, DUE TO “FRAUD” OBJECTING TO COUNSEL RECEIVING ANY LEGAL FEES, DUE TO “CORROBORATION OF A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY” AND REQUESTING STATE/FEDERAL INVESTIGATION OF ALL PARTIES INSTANTER W/AFFIDAVIT
8.) Due to Respondent’s Motion being frivolous, untimely and redundant, Respondent already attacked Petitioner’s Motion when they filed their Motion to dismiss; moreover, none of the motions are in fact in the database can your honor explain this to me?
A- Now explain to me why in the hell is Respondent trying to send me to an IME when they are paid to lie for the very attorneys paying them to lie or undermine whatever credible valid medical information from my physician?
B- The fact they have filed a Motion to Dismiss said case proves unequivocally that my skin color does not afford me the Equal Protection of the Laws given by the laws of the United States Constitution and is calling on all members of their racist fraternity to protect and uphold them in their criminal terrorists acts.
9.) If this matter is Petitioned for Review and subsequently make its way to the Appellate Court or Federal Jurisdiction these documents must be in the database for any reviewing body of judges to ascertain the merits and verity of said assertions.
10.) The FACT, that certain alleged Insurrectionists associated in this matter have politically saw to it said documents were not in the database does not in any way impeach the following:
The following is Par 15, unequivocally detailing and corroborating a Plethora of vicious misrepresentations, from the Petition Disqualification you Hegarty, it is clear in your actions, that you are not only racist but is using your position and authority in trying to uphold every vicious act recorded in said documents not properly filed in the computer.
15.) That Petitioner emailed Martay October 2, 2020 11:42 am Ref as Gr Ex M stating that, “I have been informed by my physical therapist that Thursday, October 3, will be my last day of physical therapy that is covered by Selective Insurance, the WC insurance providers. He stated that I would need to get another prescription to extend the physical therapy services for another 3 months et al.”
Also, “Dr Le stated that he wants to see me again in 3 months to determine if the plates and screws will be removed from my ankle. He said my regular insurance will pay for it. I do not want that to happen. Is there any way for us to make sure that all charges are covered by Selective Insurance”?
A- That pursuant to Gr Ex M David Martay’s reply was that, “In order for me to get updated physical therapy approved. I need a report from your doctor prescribing the additional physical therapy. Please forward the note to my attention and I will follow up with the insurance carrier”
B- Petitioner has complied with all of counsels directives but has been bamboozled into believing that she was going to receive Equal Protection and Services under the laws of adequate medical support and temporary disability payments pursuant to her work-related injury, hereto attached Ex N Medical Statement from said physician Kendall Doty 08-31-2020, “PLEASE EXCUSE PATIENT FROM WORK UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. PATIENT IS STILL UNDER DOCTOR’S CARE AND HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO RETURN TO WORK BECAUSE SHE HAS NOT REACHED MAXIMUM MEDICAL IMPROVEMENT”
BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
11.) The following is the Exhibit List from the very aforementioned is likened to someone hating the sun and will do everything humanly possible trying to block, the sun from shining into their home by hiding in a closet or covering their eyes trying not to see it, that don’t stop the sun from shining, it still shines ever so brightly.
A- This Exhibit List is like the Sun, shining with the TRUTH, that not one racist attorney or Arbitrator/Commissioner can DENY.
EXHIBIT LIST
- Ex A An email sent to Arbitrator Hagerty Friday September 25, 2020 2:24 pm.
- Gr Ex B Martay email reply Sept. 28, 3:28 pm stating, “I emailed a file stamped copy to my client earlier today”.
- Gr Ex C Martay emailed the Petitioner, September 26, 2020 7:02 am “I am sending you a file-stamped copy next week”.
- Gr Ex D David Martay emailed a file stamped copy of Notice of Motion and Order, September 28, 2020 8:53 am.
- Gr Ex E opposing counsel Rachael E. Smith and B. Smith their admissions are that they received on 8/25/20 the respondent received the petitioner/s Petitioner for an Immediate Hearing Under Section 19 (b) of the Act.
- Gr Ex F an email Friday April 3, 2020 4:16 pm, states “Hey David Thank you for sending this over. Based on the tentative regular duty release in June, please confirm that there will not be a hardware removal procedure”
- Gr Ex G, Selective Insurance Acknowledging Date of Loss 05/06/2019, where a check for $780.00 was disbursed.
- Gr Ex H, Respondent’s attorney (Rachael E. Smith) forwarded an email August 26 2020, 4:31 pm to David Martay stating, “I am in receipt of your 19(b) Petition.
- Gr Ex I, Respondent’s attorneys Rachael E. Smith, B. Smith provided an IME appointment to David Martay (March 27, 2020) for Petitioner to see said physician June 4, 2020.
- Gr Ex J, Email to David Martay August 19, 2020 2:56 pm disputing said TTD payments suspended and rebuttal to the falsehoods of said IME.
- Ex K email to David Martay from Brady, Connolly, & Masuda September 10, 2020, states “As previously advised, I am in receipt of your 19(b) and Penalties Petition for presentation to Arbitrator Hegarty during the October 26, 2020 status call in Ottawa.
- Gr Ex L CASE DOCKET unequivocally demonstrate no Motions were ever filed and no October 26, 2020 Status date was ever recorded in the system.
- Gr Ex L1 Case Docket (02 WC 045727) relates to Gr Ex O, Gr Ex 10 Page 2 Pars A-C David Martay never appeared before any Arbitrator in Petitioners manner.
- Gr Ex L2 file stamped Notice of Motion and Order relates to Gr Ex L and O demonstrating Martay never ever appeared before any Arbitrator in her favor due to alleged skin color.
- Gr Ex M Petitioner emailed Martay October 2, 2020 11:42 am stating that, “I have been informed by my physical therapist that Thursday, October 3, will be my last day of physical therapy.
- Gr Ex N Medical Statement from said physician Kendall Doty 08-31-2020.
- Gr Ex O Petitioner Tina A. Mc Daniel’s case 18 WC 25010 Petition for Review/Motion for Summary Judgment due to “Fraud” “Corroboration of Criminal Conspiracy of all Parties with Admissions” w/Affidavit
My Pleadings and Responses speak for themselves now put my case in front of an Arbitrator/Commissioner who respects the laws and lives of African American individuals.
I respectfully rest my case your Honor.
Teresa Collins, Pro SeBLACK HISTORY FACT: still to this day in this era, Black and Brown people are terribly under represented, misrepresented in all State Agencies making sure we never receive EQUAL APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS WHEN IT COMES TO INJURIES.Sad reality many Blacks in position of authority are mere figureheads it is so egregious that Chicago's political system is likened to a Plantation or Plantation Political system.Can you explain to me how Jim Crow is still being enforced in Chicago, Illinois to this very day?Joe LouisYour Honor,
I understand that your time is extremely limited and I appreciate you fitting us in this morning to discuss this matter. This message is to simply to confirm the results of our Webex conference, for the record.
Relative to the Workers’ Compensation issues:
Respondent has scheduled the petitioner for a repeat IME on February 4, 2020 with Dr. Alan League. When you asked the petitioner if she would agree to attend, she responded “I already did and they lied…” When prompted again as to whether she would attend the appointment she stated she would not.
At this time, Respondent has acted in compliance with the requirements of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act and your Honor’s instruction; therefore, Respondent will cancel the appointment and await further instruction from your Honor.
Relative to the issues which fall outside the purview of the Workers’ Compensation Act:
In light of the serious allegations made by the petitioner against your Honor, you have advised that you need to consult the IWCC’s legal counsel to determine the appropriate course of action in handling this claim moving forward.
As a result, you have returned the case to its assigned call and continued it to its next, regularly scheduled, status date of March 1, 2021 in Joliet. As no substantive motions are currently pending, you have instructed myself and the petitioner to appear for the 9:00 am status call, via Webex, and wait until after the call is completed so we can speak with you. At that time, you hope to provide additional guidance in the ongoing management of this matter.
Please note that a petition for Attorney’s Fees, filed by the Martay Law Office, is currently the only motion pending the March 1, 2021 status call.
Additionally, in light of the serious allegations made by the petitioner against myself and the Respondent, and considering the fact that the petitioner is choosing to represent herself pro se, I will refrain from any further direct communication with the petitioner, outside the “presence” of your honor.
Thank you again for your time and attention to this matter. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Otherwise, I look forward to receiving your confirmation and staying out of your inbox until we appear before you again in March.
Sincerely
Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts
Search results
Tuesday, February 9, 2021
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment