Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Wednesday, September 30, 2020


ARE BLACK DEMOCRATS THE CAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING INJUSTICES PERPETRATED AT PEOPLE OF COLOR?

IT SEEMS LIKE SO MANY DEMOCRATIC BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE MAKE EXCUSES BUT NEVER TRY TO SPEAK UP OR TAKE A STAND FOR WHAT IS RIGHT ONLY WHEN EVERYONE IS ON THE BAND WAGON.

BLACK DEMOCRATIC LEADERS NEVER SEEM TO OPEN THEIR MOUTHS WHEN ANGLO SAXON MEN WITHIN THE PARTY ARE PERPETRATING RACIAL INJUSTICES ON PEOPLE OF COLOR UNLAWFUL FORECLOSURES, JUDGES EXTORTING MONEY FROM UNLAWFUL CHILD SUPPORT CASES, THE UNLAWFUL SUSPENSION OF AN INNOCENT ATTORNEYS LICENSE FOR REPORTING JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, ELDER ABUSE CRIMES STEALING SENIOR CITIZENS MONEY FROM ESTATES BY MAKING THEM WARDS OF THE STATE, THE STEALING OF MY STIMULUS CHECK WHERE MANY DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO COVER-IT UP SO AS TO PROTECT THE ANGLO SAXON JUDGES CAUGHT "FIXING" CASES TRIED TO SAY IT WAS CHILD SUPPORT BUT NOT ONLY WAS IT NOT TRUE THE CHILD WAS THE PRODUCT OF AN INCESTUOUS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER WHO WAS A POLICE OFFICER AND DAUGHTER WHO BECAME A POLICE OFFICER AND USED HER BADGE TO TRY AND EXTORT MONEY.

I DON'T KNOW ABOUT OTHER PLACES BUT IN CHICAGO A LOT OF BLACK AND BROWN DEMOCRATS ACT LIKE CLOSET SLAVES THEY ARE MORE SERVANTS TO ANGLO SAXONS THAN THEY ARE ANYTHING ELSE.

SEE HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS UNDER SEIGE BY MOSTLY DEMOCRATIC DOMESTIC TERRORISTS AND MANY BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS ARE ON THE FRONT LINES AIDING AND ASSISTING IN DIABOLICAL TERRORIST AND CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BUT THE VERY BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FIGURE NOTHING WILL HAPPEN TO THEM AS LONG AS THEIR CRIMES ARE ON PEOPLE OF COLOR WHICH EXPLAINS WHY WE HAVE MULTIPLE SHOOTINGS AND KILLINGS IN THE CITY.

WHAT IS GOING ON IN CHICAGO HAS BEEN GOING ON LONG BEFORE PRESIDENT TRUMP BECAME THE PRESIDENT BUT MANY WILL MISLEAD YOU TO BELIEVE ALL OF THIS HAPPENED UNDER HIS PRESIDENCY.

WHERE IS THE MILITARY SUPPORT TO AID AND ASSIST THE UNITED STATES CITIZENS BORN AND RAISED IN AMERICA TO VINDICATE US FROM THIS REIME OF TERRORISTS?   

Re: 'Lanre O. Amu> Thanks! Re: Official Complaint of Illinois State Justices and Reinstatement of Lanre O. Amu Law License being Suspended due to his Ethnicity and Immigration Status of Nigerian Decent and not an Inferior Democrat American Negro3
Yahoo/Inbox
  • Joe Louis <joelouis565@yahoo.com>
    To:kenditkowsky@yahoo.com,oig.referrals@illinois.gov,michelle.casey@illinois.gov,stephen.rotello@illinois.gov,amy.adams@illinois.gov
    Cc:chicago@ic.fbi.gov,askocr@ojp.usdoj.gov,dmtucker@cbs.com,hi@qz.com,iteam@abc.com
    Tue, Sep 29 at 10:25 PM
    Mr. Amu:

    We have crossed paths for a reason, first of all it is an honor for me to have you reinstated by presenting actual cases from my own experiences fighting the Domestic Terrorists of the Democratic Political Machine.

    How can a man not a man tell a man how to be a man? so how can a man or woman appointed to the position of Judge not qualified by the legal definition of academically proficient or knowledgeable of the laws judge you or take your license away?

    They can not you never lied their is a scripture from the 109th Psalm verse 2 For the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful are opened against me: they have spoken against me with a lying tongue., this verse is truly parallel to your situation, the late judge Freeman lied on you and became a "Trespasser upon the Laws" when the order was signed and when the other judges heard evidence contradicting the contrary they became complicit in an "Organized Conspiracy" against you because you were too smart to be an attorney under the Democratic Party system so they got a House Negro in Freeman to do their bidding like so many other Black and Brown persons in the Democratic Machine do to destroy their own ethnic group to be accepted by a fraternity of hateful beings who don't respect them or like them but uses them for their own political purpose.

    In this email, I am going to prove you told the TRUTH! with corroborating documentations validating the verity of the aforementioned.

    I discussed your case to my mom years ago when they first suspended your license and told her how smart you were and that, you had an engineering degree etc. she told me back then, she didn't know why you came to this racist city they were going to do everything possible to keep you from practicing law in this state because you were a man who thought for yourself Black people in this city do what, they are told.

    So, I had to pray (faith without works is dead) train and study extra extra hard in developing a writing style preparing pleadings so as to trap, educate and articulate the laws in a way no attorney or judge has ever seen causing me to be undefeated in every court arena, I have been in; whereby, the racist Anglo Saxon Democratic judges resented me knowing the laws and applying the laws in a manner legally appropriate for a righteous verdict, in that they banded together like fraternal Klansmen and collectively DENIED every Motion, Brief, Supervisory Order/Writ of Mandamus, Summary Judgments or Jurisdictional Memorandums etc.

    I have been practicing law for 30-31 years and doing appeals for 30-31 years and had defeated every lawyer in this state/city we are being punished by the Democratic Party for being intelligent upright men with morals and love for humans and compassion for those seeking justice, this is not what the Democratic Party espouse from men like us we are supposed to be dope dealers, on drugs, on the corner begging etc. satisfying the stereotypical myths of their archaic perceptions of Black and Brown men.   

    Keep in mind this is the same party asking us to vote DEMOCRATIC after fucking us over not granting us Equal Protection of the Laws, Displacing us from Employment as a way to break our spirit, recruiting people who look like us to try and humiliate us for trying to overcome various avenues of injustices etc.  

     You Lanre levied complaints about maybe 2 or 3 judges not sure of the number and gave an accurate depiction of an "Organized Conspiracy" and had your law license suspended.

    I want you to look at the the number of judges, I have complained about recorded their names no Democrat in this city can do this, I even complained about the Federal Judges Judge Posner went on record admitting how his colleagues Discriminate against Pro se candidates, I bet you he was probably talking about the many cases, I put before that tribunal.

    The Democratic Party have unlawfully BLACK BALLED from being reinstated back to my employer CTA, a Democratic Black and Brown man can sleep with an Anglo Saxon, have sex with an Anglo Saxon, marry an Anglo Saxon but can't open their mouths and denounce racism and injustices perpetrated on us.       


     I, thought going before a Republican judge was going to be a positive thing boy was I in for a rude awakening, take a look at this Republican acting as a Democrat Robert M. Dow, Jr. Federal Judge, a FBI agent was interviewing me a while ago said that the Republicans judges are just as bad as the Democrats when it comes to corruption.

    I will show you Chicago, Illinois this place is a DOMESTIC TERRORIST CELL NETWORK of CORRUPTION AND THE DEMOCRATS OWN most of the Republicans and probably 98% of the Black and Brown Negros they have appointed and endorsed to their positions, don't nobody love nobody here, hate is everywhere in all of the courts and in the streets. 

    1. Read my unchallenged Motion filed in Federal Court naming the Illinois Supreme Court complicit in condoning criminal activities by DEMOCRATS as they covered up all Civil Rights Violations and Treason offenses.

    2. Read my Judicial Complaint filed before the SEVENTH CIRCUIT naming a plethora of unqualified judges using their positions and authorities to shake down anybody and everybody that the DEMOCRAT led circuit covered-up all TREASON OFFENSES and TERRORISTS ACTS of Democratic judges.

    3. Read how I requested the Judicial Council transfer my Judicial Complaint to another circuit the Democrats stopped it even the judges Obama as President appointed and was considering appointing was the main racist who did everything in her powers to deny anyone from reading or investigating the merits of my complaints.

    These judges are worse than any international terrorist that America has deployed troops to help those citizens where are the TROOPS TO HELP US?

    Mr. Amu do you think you have enough evidence for your reinstatement?



    IN THE 
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE
    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
    EASTERN DIVISION

     Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16 CV 7434

                                                                                           Hon:  Robert M. Dow, Jr. 
      Plaintiff

        V

    420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
    345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
    Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
     of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                           
     Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

     Defendants
                                                                                                                                                                                                   
    MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION & VACATE COURT ORDER DUE TO IT BEING A NULLITY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT

       Now comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion for Reconsideration et al;


                                                                     Respectfully Submitted,

    By:   _________________         
                                                                                                       Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                                           Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                                           P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                                            312 965-6455
                                                                                             Joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                                  @joelouis7



                                                                   IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
                                                   EASTERN DIVISION

                                                             AFFIDAVIT
                                                                                                                                                                   
    IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDER PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT


    1.    I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Petitioner in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;

    2.      That on May 2, 2018, Plaintiff appeared on Judge Dow’s Motion Call for a Summary judgment;
    A-    Plaintiff learned in court that Judge Dow purportedly dismissed or closed the matter he said on April 3, 2018, nobody provided any notice of this act nor did any of the Defendants’ communicate this fact when Notice of Summary Judgment was served on all of them.

    B-    Judge Dow in no way appeared racist or lack an intelligent aptitude of the laws maybe extraordinarily passive trying to save certain persons caught up in this matter.

    C-    Judge Dow mentioned in court that he was on the rules committee; furthermore, he has an undergraduate degree (Bachelors) from Yale University, Doctorate in Philosophy from the University of Oxford, and Juris Doctorate from Harvard Law School.

    D-    That said judge made deliberate errors in the laws so as to pass the buck, this is known as “Trespassing upon the Laws” which is an act of “Treason” only if he refuses to correct his errors.

    E-     Very few men have the credentials held by said judge it would be a disgrace for a man with such qualifications throw his career away trying to save “Private Citizens” perpetrating their roles as judges whom never should have been in the legal profession in the first place.

    F-     That Federal Officials should investigate the clerks and data system because at the time of Motion being filed for Summary Judgment Plaintiff nor the clerks saw the Order; otherwise, Plaintiffs motion never would have been filed or made it on the Judges Motion call.

    3.      That on December 18, 2017 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. entered a “Minute Order” hereto attached, “Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate the case is taken under advisement. The court will issue a ruling by mail after it has taken an opportunity to review the motion and the prior history of the case, …..et al. Notice of motion date of 12/21/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.”


    4.      That Page 2 of the alleged order purportedly entered in the data system timely, states, “Plaintiff’s motion must be denied, because this Court has no authority to review the decisions of state court judges like Valderrama. Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, only the Supreme Court of the United States has statutory authority to review the decisions of state courts in civil cases” the laws and citations are from the Seventh Circuit; That the United States Supreme Court has already laid out the precedent of the laws that are being ignored in Illinois Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
    When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
    The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
    By law, a judge is a state officer as in this case Federal officers.
    The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).

    5.       That it is clear in Judge Dow’s legal disposition he wants no part of this mess which demonstrates a conflict of his sworn oath to do as judge over this matter.

    6.      That Defendants having admitted to all facts recorded in said Complaint et al. via affidavit and Court Transcripts;
    A-    Court having no jurisdiction to Dismiss valid Prove up Default & Summary Judgment March 30, 2015, due to Judge Valderrama corroborating his role engaging in “Treason” “Trespassing upon the Laws” hereto attached , March 30, 2015 Court Order.

    B-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

    C-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

    7.      That said court order signed by Judge Valderrama, pursuant to Gr Ex C from the Dec 12, Motion, states “IT IS ORDERED THAT: this case is transferred to Calendar 6 Judge Mikva, for the sole purpose of hearing the Petition for Substitution of Judge for Cause. . Upon resolution of the Motion, the case shall be returned to the Presiding Judge for the appropriate assignment. Judge Moche Jacobius signed the Order March 18, 2016.
      
    8.      That the aforementioned Directive was never adhered to making every order entered by “Private Citizen” Valderrama a “Nullity” VOID ENTIRELY

    A-    “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)

    B-    The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
          
    9.      That pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
    (A) State in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
    (B)  Admit or Deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.

    (2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
    (3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.
    (4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
    (5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement, has the effect of a denial.
    (6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation –other than one relating to the amount of damages –is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required an allegation is considered denied or avoided.
          
    10.  That said Defendants Defaulted in the same like manner in the Cook County Court and relied on a Negroe judge inferior in nature to “Trespass upon the Laws” and commit all sorts of infamous crimes, trying to save the perpetrators guilty of Housing Discrimination and Voucher Discrimination along with various acts of Civil Rights violations hereto attached, Brief before the Seventh Circuit filed March 14, 2018;  (Lee Oties Love, Jr. v Supreme Court of IL. Et al.)
    A-    Said Brief unequivocally demonstrate the magnitude African American Democrats are willing to do to destroy their own ethnic group so as to be accepted by “White Nationalist” controlling the Democratic party “Political Machine” by embracing “Jim Crow Laws” by denying any and all claims put before the courts by persons of color against Caucasian racist Irish and other Democrats. 

    B-    That no Defendant denied or responded to the merits of the Brief at the time of this Motion being filed validating the verity of all acts by members of the Democratic Political Machine in it’s entirety.

    11.  That under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he has recruited Ronald Bartkowicz former CTA workman’s compensation attorney to “Trespass upon the Laws” in that said judge issued a Bogus warrant against the Petitioner on a Bogus paternity case where he was unlawfully arrested his CTA Badge was removed from his body so as to protect the racist individuals responsible for stealing his wages while off work injured on duty where a drunk police officer totaled his van on Petitioners bus while he was standing still;
    A-    Hereto attached, per subpoena Cook County judge not connected to the Democratic Machine of Racist and inferior Terrorists ordered the production of said CTA records, demonstrating Petitioner still being a CTA employee;

    B-    That because ATU 241 Secretary Michael Simmons was having and alleged intimate relationship with former Chief attorney Kent Stephan Ray and other men in the closet of the union obstructed his reinstatement, in that no heterosexual man of any competent or erect authority demonstrated any integrity only total impotency at the Petitioner for taking a stand at so many of them in their cowardly fraternal order;  

    12.  That under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he recruited the other aforementioned judges David HaraczTimothy P. Murphy, see unlawful1.blogspot.com Chronology of Unlawful Contempt Charges by the Democratic Political Machine, August 30, 2012, demonstrating how racist Democrats “Trespass upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason.”

    13.  That because so many black men Negroe or African American are the new black women for these Cacausion men with wives and children none of them opened their mouths; moreover, there is a person in prominent authority been married to his wife for 10, 20 or 30 years had a man in his life almost the same time of his marriage so it is these type of individuals who are not at all what they appear to be but is using their political, racist and sexual cowardice at the Petitioner for being what he was born to be a man, a man’s man.

    14.  Allegedly, Edward Burke had Judge John T. Carr to aid and assist his ex-wife by having the court reporter to allegedly leave the court as he aided her by allowing her to manufacture allegations of domestic abuse on his children DCFS got involved asserting he was a black belt in martial arts using it to discipline his children, by her going along with these sick acts she was promised welfare in her name. (none of it was true) they tried getting the Police involved “Desk Sargent   told DCFS not to bring that shit back up in here!”
    A-    To further amplify the horrors of hate Edward Burke and his regime of judges using their robes to “Trespass upon the Laws” Petitioner was taking his family to family psychiatrist at least 2 and 3 times a week behind the episodes of what he was going through in the courts.

    15.  Allegedly, Edward Burke and other Democrats incur profits off of judges “Trespassing upon the laws” where injustice is present, in that, hereto attached, Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account, manufactured by the Illinois Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services asserting Petitioner owes $228.00 on a case Democratic Judges have used their robes as “Private Citizens” aiding and abetting in “Treason” and a plethora of diabolical criminal conspiracies seeking money in an unlawful manner.
    A-    “Private Citizen” Valderrama having cognizance of the plethora of criminal acts of what other judges engaged in against the Petitioner demonstrated untouchable arrogance because nothing happened to the other judges, thought he could profit off the Petitioner but what he was too ignorant to realize none of the judges signed any court orders on the 88 D 079012 case, he has signed every court order and has agreed to everything by not denying anything.
          
    Defendants have not raised any affirmative defenses.

    Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the movant or non-movant fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby    
    1.      Entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.


    The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of fact, but simply to                 
    Determine whether one exists.

    When the party moving for summary judgment supplies evidentiary facts which,
     If not contradicted, would entitle him to judgment, the opposing party cannot
     Rely upon his complaint or answer alone to raise issues of material fact. A counter
     Affidavit is necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit
     Supporting the motion or else the facts are deemed admitted.

    Here, Plaintiff has supplied affidavits, Certified Court transcripts and other evidentiary material that establishes all of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery under the parties’ agreements, including the amount of damages. Defendants have failed to submit any evidence in opposition to the Motion or Order to raise any genuine issues of material fact. Thus summary judgment is proper.


                 FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT

                                                                                Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                              __________________
                                                                                  Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                 P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                    312 965-6455
                                                                       joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                             @joelouis7
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
    WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief


    1.    For an Order Vacating the Order due to Error.

    2.    For an Order Granting Summary Judgment Instanter.

    3.    For an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding Franklin U. Valderrama into Custody Instanter.

    4.    For an Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;

    5.    For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as judges Trespassing upon the Laws”

    6.    For an Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.

    7.    For an Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any judge in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.

    8.    For an Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their oaths as judges.

    9.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly 
    just;
                                                                IN THE
                                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                             FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                  219 South Dearborn
                                                CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

    Joe Louis Lawrence                                           
    Petitioner

       V.
       
                                                                                                         Case #
    William J. Bauer, Daniel A. Manion, Richard A Posner,
    Richard D. Cudahy, Daniel Tinder, Ilana Diamond Rovner,
    David Hamilton, Mathew Connelly, Edmong Chang, Franklin Uylesses
    Valderrama, Thomas Hoffman, Mary K. Rochford,
    Leonard Murray, George F. Scully,Jr., Ronald Bartkowicz,
    Timothy P. Murphy, David Haracz, Kathleen Kennedy, Themeis N. Karnezis,
    Mathias W. Delort, Joy V. Cunningham, Timothy Calvin Evans, Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Lloyd A. Karmeier, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride, Cynthia Y. Cobb, David Ellis, Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., James Fitzgerald Smith, Rodolpho Garcia, Patrick J. Quinn, Warren D. Wolfson, Lorreta Higgins- Wolfson, Sebastin Patti, Shelvin Louise Marie Hall, Michael Murphy, Maxwell Griffin, Jr. Leida J. Gonzalez Santiago  et al.
    Respondents

                                                  JUDICIAL COMPLAINT

     I Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner Pro se Counsel hereby Petitions the Honorable Judicial Council regarding the aforementioned statutes of violations ignored by Judge John W. Darrah and all of his colleagues complicit in said foregoing acts.

    Statutes: Trespassers of the Laws, Treason, Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Housing Discrimination,  Judicial Bias, Judges Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations, Violations of the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of  Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by any Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.

    1.)  That judges (Daniel A. Manion, Diane Sykes, Richard A. Posner, Richard D. Cudahy, Daniel Tinder, Ilana Diamond Rovner) in the Court of Appeals demonstrated their racial hatred at the Petitioner for standing up to corruption and racial hatred collectively denied every motion accompanied with an affidavit, whereby judge Darrah is expecting said judges to continuously Trespass upon the Laws and deny every document Petitioner put before the Court of Appeals as they committed Treason;
         
    A-   Petitioner filed a Petition for Review (Nov. 23, 2016) hereto attached an unnamed person unlawfully retrieved the document in the Federal Building from the Court of Appeals area and mailed it to the Petitioner as a means of destroying the document, hereto attached, copy of the government envelope postage of $6.80 validating the verity of active Treason employees engaging in Terrorist Conspiracy Obstruction of Justice surpassing human imagination;
      
    B-   Petitioner informed the court how CHA colluded with Craig Fulton case 13 cv 02852 Edmond E. Chang was the judge, City officials and CHA embezzled money from the section 8 program where abandoned buildings were used placing innocent families like the Petitioner in buildings that was “Nigger Rigged” which is the term city officials described when buildings are put together bypassing all city certifications and inspections to place qualified applicants in substandard housing as they collect tax free money from the Federal Government section 8 program;
     


























    IN THE 
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE
    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
    EASTERN DIVISION

     Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16 CV 7434

                                                                                           Hon:   Robert M. Dow, Jr.    
      Plaintiff

        V

    420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
    345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
    Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
     of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                          
     Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

     Defendants
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         NOTICE OF      
     MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION & VACATE COURT ORDER DUE TO IT BEING A NULLITY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT

    Please be advised that on, May 2, 2018 Plaintiff has filed before this District Court, Motion for Summary Judgment et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before any Judge in  judge Robert M. Dow’s stead May 10 , 2018, at 9:15am in room 1919.       

    Chicago Housing Authority             Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
    Office of the General Counsel                     Christian T. Novay
    Asst Gen Counsels                                  55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800  
    Maria Sewell Joseph   T.B. King                 Chicago, Il 60603
    60 East Van Buren
    Chicago, Ill 60605                                                                          
                                                                           Seyfarth & Shaw
                                                       Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris        
                                                                      Willis/Sears Tower
                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60603

    Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
    Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
    30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800, Chicago, Ill. 60602
    Cary G. Schiff & Associates                    Gordon & Rees LLP
    Christopher R. Johnson                           Goli Rahimi
    Yuleida Joy                                               1 North Franklin, Suite 800
    134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             Chicago, Illinois 60606
    Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    

    Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
    Christian Novay
    550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
    Chicago, IL. 60661

          Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
          Presiding Judge Moche Jacobius, Room 2403, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
          Assc. Judge Franklin U. Valderrama, Room 2402, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601  
        Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg Ill. 60601                                           
           
          States Attorney, Kim Foxx, Room 500 Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
          Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
               
    CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
    Chris KlepperExecutive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
    28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor  
    Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615     
                                                                       
    CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               
    Jessie McDaniel                                                        
    4859 S. Wabash                                                    
    Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                

    Courtesy Copies:
    US Attorney                                                FBI  Dir. Chris Wray   
    John R. Lausch, Jr.                               2111 West Roosevelt Road
    219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                              Chicago, Ill. 60612
    Chicago, Ill. 60604

    Governor                                                Hon Mark Kirk
    Bruce Rauner                                         607 East Adams, Suite 1520
    100 West Randolph, Suite                       Springfield, Ill. 62701
    Chicago, Ill. 60601

    Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
    Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
    City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
    Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

    Hon Dick Durbin                                             Judge
    525 South 8th St.                                             Frederick Bates
    Springfield, Ill. 62703                               50 West Washington Room
                                                                         Chicago, Ill. 60601
    Judge                                                           
    Celia C. Gamrath                                            Judge
    50 West Washington Room 2508             Neil Cohen
                                                                    50 West Washington Room 2308

                                            Alderman David Moore
                                            Alderman Ed Burke  
                                          Alderwoman Carrie Austin
                                           Alderwoman Emma Mitts

    Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
    Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
    118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
    Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

                                               
                   PLEASE BE ADVISED that on May 10, 2018, A Motion for Reconsideration Vacate Order et al. has been filed with the Northern District of Illinois and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;

                                                                                     Respectfully, Submitted,

                                                                                       Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                       Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                      Chicago, Ill 60649
                                                                                       312 965-6455
                                                                                       joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                         @joelouis
     
    JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
                     ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
                                     ONE COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NE
                                       WASHINGTON D. C. 20544
                                      

    Joe Louis Lawrence
    Petitioner

       V.
       
                                                                                                         Case # 07-16-90074
    John W. Darrah, Diane P. Wood, Ann C. Williams,
    Diane Sykes, Kenneth Ripple, Frank H. Easterbrook et al.
    Respondents




                PETITION TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL                               
                             
     I Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner Pro se Counsel, Heterosexual Native/African American “Free Man” Born & Raised hereby petitions the Honorable Judicial Council of the aforementioned statutes of violations ignored by Judge John W. Darrah and all of his colleagues complicit in said foregoing acts to transfer said matter Pursuant to Rule 26.

    Statute: Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Housing Discrimination,  Judicial Bias, Judges Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations, Violations of the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of  Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by any Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.

    The request for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:

    Rule 26 is new, it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.

    Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.        

    That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook County judges violating the RICO ACT, the 7th Cir. Held that the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;

    That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes to every complaint said Petitioner put before them on appeal in affidavits validating the verity of judges committing Treason Trespassing upon the laws of the United States Constitution engaging in “WAR” against the United States Constitution making every order rendered against the Petitioner. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason;

    That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes to the fact Petitioner was locked up unlawfully 5 times for allegedly owing child support on a case Alderman Edward Burke and his Democratic Terrorist in the Political Machine orchestrated (88 D 079012) to unlawfully extort money, hereto attached, Gr Ex Afalsified document Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account from the Il Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services, against Petitioner in the name of child support where the case was dismissed September 17, 1987 85 D 068185;

    That every judge in the Seventh Circuit were aware Judge Kenneth Ripple, African American Ann Claire Williams, and Diane Sykes Trespassed upon the laws and committed Treason lied on court documents saying, “In 1987 the State of Illinois ordered Joe Lawrence to pay child support. He did not comply, and consequently the state revoked his driver's license. He appealed the revocation to the Secretary of State, but his appeal was denied. Lawrence also unsuccessfully sued his former employers, International Brands Corporation and the Chicago Transit Authority, in state and federal court for embezzlement and theft”.

    That certain judges in the Seventh Circuit were aware Petitioner was homeless and the Nazi style acts perpetrated at him with a Section 8 voucher was denied access to live within the city using said voucher, due to ethnicity and complaining blowing the whistle on many of the powerfully connected judges engaging criminal terrorist acts;

    That certain judges in the Seventh Circuit were aware African American Associate Political Appointed judge Franklin Ulylesses Vallderrama acting as a Puppet for his white masters, “Fixed” the case Trespassed upon the Laws and committed Treason threatened the Petitioner in open court in front of many white attorneys who openly stated, “Hell naw, I don’t want no part of this shit! This judge is crazy”
    That Judge Valderrama ignored the fact the 6 or 7 law firms admitted to Petitioner’s claims of Housing and Racial Discrimination regarding Source Income violations DEFAULTED on $25 Million Dollars, said judge stated, “he does not accept certified mail or an affidavit printout from the clerk’s office (Dorothy Brown) showing the parties were served and never replied timely; 

    Judges Mary Lane Mikva and Neil Cohen have asked said attorneys to respond or rebut the Petitioners argument all have declined and never have any attorney ever objected or denied any of the facts Petitioner has put before any courts, so said judges have to step outside their jurisdiction and commit Treason to keep the Petitioner from having Equal Protection of the Laws from any courts where they have control. 

     That it is apparent no judge in the Seventh Circuit were aware they had become Trespassers of the laws and committed Treason pursuant to the aforementioned acts and are the new “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and a dangerous Threat to National Security due to their abuse of Power;

     That Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal, November 16, 2016 hereto attached;

    That Petitioner filed a Motion for Leave to Appeal Informa Pauperis (Nov. 30, 2016) said judges ignored all of the unlawful acts of Treason and Trespassing of the Laws offenses, hereto attached;

    That Judge Darrah Democrat and member of the Judicial Committee unlawfully Trespassed upon the Laws denied Petitioners Motion August 8, 2016, hereto attached signed court order;

    That Judge Darrah assumed the jurisdiction of a Court of Appeals judge Denied said Motion to proceed informa paupers before the Seventh Circuit, hereto attached, December 12, 2016 order with no signature;

    That Petitioner received from the Seventh Circuit Dec. 12, 2016, that he pay $505 or file a Motion to Proceed Informa Pauperis, if not done in 30 days case would be dismissed;

    That because the Seventh Circuit and various judges are actively engaging in WAR against the United States Constitution making sure certain ethnic groups not receive Equal Protection of the Laws makes it impossible for any citizen of Illinois receive justice in accordance to the Laws of the United States Constitution due to the aforementioned;  

       WHEREFORE Petitioner Prays this matter and all related cases be transferred to another Honorable Judicial Council Circuit, for a reversal and remand with instructions removing the necessary judges based on the foregoing stated above who have participated in these Diabolical Terrorist Acts:

       The Honorable Judicial Council has the Jurisdiction, to correct any error, and establish any precedent in the law where deemed necessary, without fear of reprisals from any political organization, terrorist fraternal orders, elected or otherwise, for the mandate of their decision;

       The Honorable Judicial Council has the Jurisdiction and Wisdom to recognize when an individual has not been afforded sapiency in accordance to the United States Constitution Laws;

    Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council  because as a”Pro Se” “Informa Pauper’s“ the admissions recorded in this instrument demonstrates under the Illinois Legal system Black and Brown lives don’t matter and the Jim Crow methods still being exercised criminalizing persons of color for attempting to rise above racial injustice perpetrated on innocent persons. 

    Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council because of the color of his skin all defendants have admitted to all criminal acts and civil rights violations but the judges have ignored all admissions affidavits, the Laws and laws the United States Constitution and Plaintiffs Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff is a nobody merely because of his skin color, every ruling has been dispensated according to racial political guidelines;


    For all of the aforementioned reasons is why the Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council for Jurisdiction and Enforcement. 

    I affirm the above as being true.
                                                                 Respectfully Submitted,

                                                                 Petitioner/Counsel Pro Se
                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence

    JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
                     ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
                                     ONE COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NE
                                       WASHINGTON D. C. 20544
                                     

    Joe Louis Lawrence
    Petitioner

       V.
       
                                                                                                         Case # 07-16-90074
    John W. Darrah, Diane P. Wood, Ann C. Williams,
    Diane Sykes, Kenneth Ripple, Frank H. Easterbrook et al.
    Respondents


                                                               NOTICE OF
                PETITION TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL                               

    I  Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on this day filed said Notice of Petition to Transfer et al. Before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.

    To: DirJames ComeyFBI 601 4th Street, NW Washington D.C. 20535
              FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
              US AttorneyZachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

    Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and Disability
    Attn: Office of General Counsel
    Administrative Office of the United States Courts
    One Columbus Circle, NE
    Washington, D. C. 20544

                    PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Dec 19, 2016, A Petition to Transfer et al. has been filed before the Judicial Conference et al. and noted parties 
                                                                 Respectfully Submitted

                                                                     Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
                                                                               PO Box 490075
                                                                          Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
                                                                              312 -965-6455
                                                                          joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                             @joelouis7              
  • FOR THE

No comments:

Post a Comment