READ HOW RACIST DEMOCRATS MAINTAIN EMPLOYMENT IN THE LEGAL CAPACITY DEGRADING AND OPPRESSING INNOCENT MEN OF COLOR RECRUITING ATTORNEYS AND BLACK OR HISPANIC JUDGES TO AID AND ASSIST THEM KEEPING JIM CROW LAWS ALIVE IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.
READ HOW BLACK AND HISPANIC JUDGES DON'T HAVE AUTHORITY OVER WHITES POLITICALLY CONNECTED IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND WILL COMPLY WITH ANY DIRECTIVE GIVEN TO THEM BY A WHITE ATTORNEY KEEPING THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUP OPPRESSED.
READ HOW CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY CALVIN EVANS IS REALLY A FIGURE HEAD IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY SELECTED AND APPOINTED TO CIRCUMVENT FEDERAL LAWS MAKING SURE "JIM CROW LAWS" REMAIN IN EFFECT IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS; FURTHERMORE, SEE HOW BLACK AND BROWN MEN AND WOMEN IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ARE THE REASON WHY CHICAGO IS IN THE APATHETIC STATE BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOLD OUT SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY RACIST DEMOCRATS STILL CONTROLLING THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE.
FUTURE POST WILL VALIDATE THE VERITY OF THIS ASSERTION, IN THAT ASSOCIATE JUDGE WILLIAM STEWART BOYD A MASTER "FIXER" IN A DIVORCE MATTER UNLAWFULLY REMANDED AN INNOCENT ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE POST OFFICE PROVING THIS DOCUMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
THE TITLE OF THAT POST WILL BE CAPTIONED "HOW NIGGER JUDGES HELP ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE DESTROY MEN OF COLOR"
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
)
Francoise
Hightower )
Judge Jean M. Cocozza
Petitioner
)
) Cal 95
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe
Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room 1506
MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 &
VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT”
JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE
CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO
SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137
Now comes the Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Heterosexual MAN BORN & RAISED a FREEMAN Promise
and Swear to this Honorable Court as follows:
A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates
disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating
court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to
accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s
indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with
our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its
citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
A-
Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v.
United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v.
C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question
that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the
procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328
U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such
a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v.
Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v.
Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto)
61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
B-
“A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A
judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and
lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a
nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no
judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at
any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44,
45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d
227-232
C-
“A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal
efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and
effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in
any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked
at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v.
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st
Dist. 1964)
D-
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish
that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process,
either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
E-
A void judgment does not create any binding
obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42
U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not
to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d
384 (1990).
1.
That case 88 D 079012 is a “FIXED CASE” under the alleged authority of Alderman Edward
Burke.
2.
Said case
was originally DISMISSED under case 85
D 068184 September 17, 1987 before judge D. Adolphus Rivers where
Richard J. Daley was the States Attorney.
3.
That because Richard J. Daley allegedly wanted no part
to unlawfully “FIXING” said
Paternity case against the Respondent where there were allegations of William
Jenkins Hightower a Chicago Police Officer impregnating his second biological
daughter Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower, the first daughter being Danielle
Hightower as a minor.
4.
That because of Francoise’s fathers’ political
connection to Joseph V. Roddy who was allegedly a great colleague to Edward
Burke orchestrated the “Fixing” of
said case assigning certain judges of Irish descent to do what was necessary
framing the Respondent for a child that was never his.
5.
That under case 85
D 068184 Respondent DEMANDED a JURY TRIAL and was properly served had
two independent paternity tests that excluded him from paternity but was
altered to state he was the father from Cook County Hospital and American Red
Cross Hospital.
6.
That under case 88
D 079012 Respondent was never served!!! There were never any paternity
tests nor were there a Motion filed to consolidate the 85 D 068184 pursuant to the Feb 1988 court order if the Respondent
was never served.
7.
That because of the confidence in Edward Burke’s
assignment of judges being appointed to this case and because D. Adolphus
Rivers being at the time an African American his court directive was ignored.
8.
That on May 18, 1988, hereto attached, a blank court
order absent a judges’ signature or attorney information finding the Respondent
in Default on a plethora of “Fraudulent misrepresentations” made to the
court about serving him which was never true.
9.
That Respondent had retained an Attorney Robert Anthony
Egan who for years at that time aggressively represented and defended him and
was the attorney of record but was never notified of any attorney going back
before the clerks’ office refiling the matter.
10. That Respondent was a CTA Bus Operator at 69th
Ashland where Francoise appeared at the garage in her Police Officers uniform
and left a copy of the May 1988 court order, clerks and bus operators described
her perfectly’
11. That
Respondent immediately notified Robert Egan of the court order, he purportedly
went to vacate the date of Feb. 23, 1988 service of alleged service but vacated
Feb. 24, 1988.
12. That
because of the “Fraudulent admissions” the May 18, 1988 court order
demonstrating Respondent was never ORDERED to pay any child support still
legally standing to this very day.
13. That
alderman Edward Burke appointed an alcoholic Associate Irish judge who was
always drunk James T. Meehan to preside over the case where he “Trespassed upon the Laws” ordered the
Respondent to pay Francoise’s attorney Joseph V. Roddy legal fees despite of
testimony from Francoise having had gonorrhea and received medicine from her physician
prescribing medicine for her and her partner, Respondent never had any disease
from her but she had testified Respondent was the only person she had sex with
and the child was allegedly born with an infection.
A-
Respondent had a diary of the women he slept with and
the date he had sex with Francoise was the second week of March but was
pregnant in the second week of February.
B-
Judge Meehan heard testimony of John Patterson III
Francoise’s physician alter medical records to reflect the child was born
premature.
C-
Judge Meehan ordered the Respondent never to see the
child because he knew the child was not his but ordered him to pay child
support.
14. That
Alderman Burke appointed Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney to preside
over the Hightower case where he “Trespassed
upon the Laws” engaged in “Treason”
signed a Bogus Warrant against the Respondent for an Order of Protection in
favor of Francoise. Respondent had not seen or communicated with Francoise.
A-
That Ronald Bartkowicz threatened the Respondent in
open court, stated if “he ever tried to
be reinstated back to the CTA he was going to have him locked up because CTA
said you are not an employee they fired you.”
B-
That the Cook County Sheriff Deputy informed the
Respondent Fuck him and what he said he is working with the CTA he was an
attorney and should not be on this case, Respondent was shocked and scared
because he had no idea what was going on and why a warrant was ever issued.
C-
That the Respondent filed a Motion to Disqualify Ronald
Bartkowicz due to the conflict, said judge was shocked asked him how did he
know?
15. That
Alderman Burke appointed David E. Haracz a former Legal Aid attorney who “Trespassed upon the Laws” engaged in “Treason” was a Supervisor at the time
Respondent was seeking their support they had turned him down for any
representation stating because there were too many judges on the case.
A-
That Judge Haracz stated, “He realize this may not be his child he is just the bill collector, he
has to get money from him some kind of way”
B-
That the Respondent presented documents establishing
the fact he was a certified CTA employee, Haracz stated, “you know, you are an employee you were telling the truth all along,
you know, you are really smart, I mean really really smart” In a startling
dumbfounded manner.
C-
That Haracz placed the Respondent in Contempt for Allegedly
owing child support, Respondent had to pay monies from his welfare payments
and was sent to jail.
16. That
every judge Burke appointed became “Private
Citizens” as diabolical Racist White men had placed him in Contempt of Court
for Allegedly owing Child Support when the record demonstrated he owed nothing.
17. That
Alderman Burke appointed the ultimate racist Timothy P. Murphy, he demonstrated
a personal hate because the Respondent was well versed in the laws when it was
the Respondent’s opportunity to cross-examine Russ Hinkle from Wonder Bread
human resource department, to prove he was an employee off work with a torn
rotator cuff resulting from being injured on the truck not receiving any money
(workman’s compensation), he ordered the Deputies to Remand the Respondent into
Custody for Contempt of Court, the Deputies were shocked they expressed this is
some deep bullshit, they said this is not about child support, Respondent
explained to them about the father being a Police Officer impregnated his
daughter who was a Police officer, they said, that they heard about the
Respondent and this case and was very supportive to him. Respondent never got
the opportunity to prove he was an active employee at Wonder Bread;
A-
That allegedly Moche Jacobius whom Respondent had met
prior as an Assistant Attorney General who learned of the Respondent fighting a
Bogus Paternity case long before he became a judge, told him that he heard
about that matter wished him success provided an attorney Gerald Norgren to
defend him in the Contempt matter before Murphy.
B-
That during this time never did Haracz or Murphy ever
have a court file on the Respondent it was the States Attorney always providing
documents, Respondent repeatedly refuted the allegations with numerous motions
but was ignored and Denied.
C-
Respondent was in Court because the Illinois Department
of Public Aid was representing Francoise an active Police Officer when her
daughter was a grown woman and the Respondent was on Public Aid with his
family.
D- That
Murphy had the audacity to say in front of the Respondent and Norgren “Today is your lucky day, I can’t lock you
up anymore”
E-
Respondent was on welfare with is wife and children and
the judges were forcing him to pay his welfare money to pay child support.
F-
That while everyone was falsifying and “Trespassing upon the Laws” trying to
help Francoise in this “Heinous Diabolical Nefarious Acts” she notified school
officials at Bogan High School in Chicago 79th Pulaski that “she did not know who the father was of her
daughter “
18. That
Alderman Burke had appointed Associate judge Morgan Hamilton as a permanent
judge during this time who had a self-hate for her own skin color and would do
anything to protect a corrupt white judge wrote on a court order “that Respondent left a cloud of mistrust by
the Cook County Sheriff claiming he was a CTA employee” as she was trying
to protect Ronald Bartkowicz.
19. That
Alderman Edward Burke appointed Leida J. Santiago- Gonzalez she was on the
bench cussing, I don’t know who the fuck he think he is referring to the
Respondent he will be going to jail, Respondent felt like he was about to have
a bile movement but nothing was coming out he fell to the floor, he couldn’t
see but was able to hear somebody shouted he is having an anxiety attack call
the paramedics, the judge said his ass better be having something, someone provided
something to smell and gave him some water, the Deputies comforted him said he didn’t
need to go to the hospital try to breathe and get yourself together.
A-
Respondent never got the opportunity to stand before
the judge.
20. That
because Alderman Edward Burke is the Author of Racist hate in acquiring judges
who will abide by his rules of “Trespassing
upon the Laws” and engage in “Treason
Offenses” is why no Democratic judge of merit or any person with integrity
would assist the Respondent because the Democratic Party is the original party
of racial hatred.
A- Democratic
Mayor Rahm Emmanuel, Former Police Superintendent McCarthy, Former States
Attorney, Attorney General Lisa Madigan received Notice and knowledge of Corruption
on Police Officer et al. via email hereto attached.
B- Democratic
States Attorney Kim Foxx received Notice and Knowledge via email and Memo of
States Attorneys using their positions to assist a Police Officer (retired).
C- That
Respondent was informed by certain Caucasians that no Person Democratic of Irish
or Polish ethnicity will ever rule in his favor against the perpetrators
involved and especially none of his Bros referencing Black men fraternal or
otherwise, in that they said they are the worse persons he was to ever go
before for help because they do what they are told but there are some good
white judges who will help him.
D- To
validate the verity of Par C
Respondent was living in an abandoned building that was “Nigger Rigged” the terminology city officials used to
describe a said building CHA approved the respondent to move in case 12-M-711552 where judge George Scully had
vacated order of possession in Respondent’s favor, allegedly Edward Burke had
Leonard Murray a Black judge to issue an order for the Cook County Sheriff to
break into his home 10058 S Vernon using a Battering Ram because the owner was
connected to certain City officials where he did not have to pay water bills
and was collecting section 8 monies by “Fixing” up abandon buildings not
cleared by the city inspectors by bypassing city permits.
E- That
Respondent lost 25-30 years of his possessions in the 4-bedroom home and was
informed if he attempted to enter the building because a green NO TRESPASSING Notice was Posted on the
front door.
F- That
Alderman Edward Burke allegedly orchestrated the entire conspiracy seeking to
ascertain what documents respondent in his possession Respondent had
transcripts of the entire 88 D 079012
case and the entire original court file of 85 D 068184 and credit reports
showing student loans paid off excellent credit and scores of 800+ in that
after Respondent’s home was broken into his identity was tampered with someone
went into his credit and deleted every item that was paid off in good status
and placed a number of false entries on credit report by bringing his credit
score to 500 and 600 in an attempt to blemish his credit score so as to keep him
from qualifying from moving into certain buildings with his section 8 voucher
with poor credit.
G-
21. That
every person who received Notice and Knowledge of the aforementioned acts
and did nothing have become complicit as active “Trespassers of the Laws” engaging in “Treason Offenses”
22.
That a certain person or persons of white ethnicity allegedly connected to Edward Burke
tried reaching out to him to leave the Respondent alone let him go back to work
with the CTA and give him his money, Burkes alleged reply, “Fuck that Nigger as long as he is the Alderman Respondent will never
go back to the CTA and he ain’t getting shit!”
A-That because Alderman Edward Burke
controls all the Niggers at the CTA and Local ATU 241 and those under his
control Respondent has never been properly reinstated to the CTA because of the
intimate nature Burke seems to have against men he seems to affectionately
hates and disparages in conversations referencing them as Niggers!
B- That
because Alderman Edward Burke allegedly controls 98% of the Black men on the
Cook County Bench allegedly authorized Franklin Ulysses Valderrama to “FIX” case 2015
CH 01670 a Discrimination
Suit Respondent filed against various units who refused to allow him to rent
into there buildings (credit score 716) with his voucher because of his skin
color they took his fucking money didn’t return it, they DEFAULTED and
Valderrama had no jurisdiction on the case because Moche Jacobius signed a
court order removing him from the case. Valderrama became a God and law unto
himself ruled on the case keeping Cecilia Gamrath from presiding over the case,
he stated he didn’t accept certified mail nor did he except the Cook County Sheriff
serving the parties.
23. There
is not a Black man in Chicago politics with any testicles to stand up to Burke
to tell him he is wrong but will remain in the closet hoping nobody will ever
discover who they are.
A-
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E.
2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme
Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
24. That
Respondent was referred to William S. Boyd by a remarkable attorney James
Montgomery who had him to sit and explain his issue for at least 30 minutes and
was impressed with Respondents presentation, a member of Trinity church Boyd is
in no way anything like Mr. Montgomery blacks like Boyd in the Cook County
courts as Democrats are sell outs destroying their own ethnic groups so as to
be accepted by the likes of Edward Burke whom has no love for persons of color
and has demonstrated in the aforementioned how he destroys men of color and the
Demonic Hate exercised as he selects and appoints judges to uphold his
doctrines circumventing the laws of the United States constitution enforcing Jim
Crow Laws.
25.
That in furtherance to the above, Respondent
asserts with authority
and based on such information and belief,
demonstrate beyond the Preponderance of the evidence standard that all
judges acted as a “Private Citizens”
and has “Trespassed upon the laws” whom this
cause has pended before, has demonstrated taking part in an “Organized Conspiracy” with said Alderman
Burke by making sure Joe Louis Lawrence remain oppressed for being a Heterosexual
“FREEMAN” standing up to the unlawful acts perpetrated at him by racist
white men engaging in Terrorist Acts in the Democratic Party. .
A-
That
all judges acted as a “Private Citizens” they never had jurisdiction on
the Respondent to compel him to submit to any laws from any court compelling
him to pay child support or enter any
orders finding him in Contempt of Court, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate
has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or
execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v.
Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
B-
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments
and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void;
and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to
them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing
such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as
trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328,
340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered conspiracy at same time or have
taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec.
162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728
(Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia
removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional rights;
Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for improperly
jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution
which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants’ basic constitutional
rights;
26.
That Respondent has demonstrated beyond the Preponderance of
Evidence that said acts demonstrates how Section
1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v.
Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually
carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with
Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and
plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be
treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis
v. Brautigan (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W.
Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).
A-
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
27. That
Respondent’s (former attorney William S. Boyd) has demonstrated being unfit and
should be disbarred from the practice of law for his criminal involvement
violating every aspect of Illinois Ethics by misrepresenting the Respondent to allegedly
receive an Associate Judges position.
Ethics
All Illinois lawyers
must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trial lawyers
must be particularly familiar with the
rules that apply
specially to them.
RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal," sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer
during “battle." Section (a) of that rule states:
(a) In appearing in
a professional capacity before
a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:
(1) Make a statement
of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer
knows or reasonably should know is false;
(2) Fail to disclose
to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when
disclosure is necessary
to avoid assisting a criminal
or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) Fail to disclose
to the tribunal legal authority
in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly
adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;
(4) Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material
evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
Supreme Court
Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other
paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its
own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party,
or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the
other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of
the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable
attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for
active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can
also justify an award of sanctions. BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992
Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the
fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is
no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer
has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly
and severally liable with the lawyer.
Despite the United States Constitution
and Civil Rights Act Plaintiff has not been treated as a citizen of the United
States in that whites under this Political System has been able to circumvent
the laws and commit treason like offenses because they are the majority in
control in Chicago, Ill. Political system; Pursuant to Vigus v. O’Bannon is an
example of the “Fraudulent” Racist Acts perpetrated against persons like the
Plaintiff standing up to Racial Injustice and Terrorism!
Plaintiff’s license was
never suspended because there was never a signed court order stating he owed
any child support but was locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support;
A.
Plaintiff Lost
his job with Sheriff Department in the Administrative capacity because of the
Bogus Paternity case;
B.
Despite scoring
in the top 5-10% on the Police Exam a Commander with the Police Department
could not bring him on the Police department because of some integrity issues
that had to be resolved with the Bogus Paternity case;
C.
Plaintiff lost
his job driving a School bus (Reliable who later went out of business) because
someone was forcing them to accept bogus court orders for wage garnishees where
Plaintiff was forced to get on Welfare because of all of the money extorted
from his salary;
D.
Plaintiff was
rear ended by drunk Police Officer standing still driving a CTA bus Officer
totaled his van, Plaintiff sustained a back injury while off work injured on
duty allegedly City hall officials and CTA personnel stole his wages and tried
to destroy said personnel records saying Plaintiff was never a CTA employee.
E.
Despite filing
a grievance the Union never acted on the matter even up to this date, but the
union Javier Perez called the Plaintiff last year telling them they never
received a letter from his physician stating he was fit to return to return to
work, if he had that letter we could do something about getting you reinstated,
what he did not realize Plaintiff had the information faxed it to him never
heard from him again;
F.
Plaintiff got
accepted to Northwestern Law School scored very high on LSAT could not attend
school because of the plethora of Racist Diabolical Obstructions no white man
have to endure living in Chicago, Illinois
G.
They have retaliated on Plaintiff’s children along with a plethora
of other “Fraudulent Acts;
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise Hightower )
Judge Jean M. Cocozza
Petitioner
)
) Cal 95
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room 1506
MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 &
VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT”
JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE
CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO
SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137
In Accordance to all of The Cook County
Circuit Court Rules
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE
RELIEF REQUESTED
The
canons of ethic in the Rules of Professional Conduct constitute a safe guide
for professional conduct, and attorneys may be disciplined for not observing
them. In re Himmel, 125 Ill.2d 531,
533 N.E.2d 790, 127 Ill. Dec 708 (1988). Although they represent the best
thoughts of the organized bar, it has been held that these canons are
non-enforceable other than through the disciplinary proceedings. Ettinger v.
Rolewick, 140 Ill.App.3d 295, 488 N.E.2d 598, 94 Ill.Dec.599 (1st
Dist. 1986). Disciplinary proceedings and sanctions are strictly within the
province of the Supreme Court. Reed Yates
Farms, Inc. v. Yates, 172 Ill.App.3d 519, 526 N. E2d 1115, 122 Ill. Dec 576
(4th Dist.), appeal denied,
the Illinois Supreme Court, through its disciplinary arm, the Attorney
Registration and Disciplinary Commission, is the only forum for exacting
such punishment. Beale v. Edgemark
Financial Corp., 297 Ill. App. 3d 999, 697 N.E.2d 820, 232 Ill. Dec. 78 (1st
Dist. 1998). The ultimate authority to regulate and define the practice of law
rests with the Supreme Court. Perto v.
Board of Review, Illinois Department of Employment Security, 274 Ill.
App.3d 485, 654 N.E.2d 232, 210 Ill. Dec. 933 (2d Dist.), appeal denied, 164 Ill. 2d 581 (1995).
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal
contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable
crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App
651, 1889 WL 2373 (1st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations
to the court. People v. Katelhut, 322
Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E.2d 590 (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an
officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1st
Dist. 1939).
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits
misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official
capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as
required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by
law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or
another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38
33-3.
False statements
Censure was recommended sanction for
attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made statement of
material fact or law to tribunal which she knew or reasonably should have known
to be false, and failed to disclose to tribunal a material fact known to her
when disclosure was necessary to avoid assisting criminal or fraudulent at by
client, given that attorney’s misconduct was not result of dishonest or corrupt
motive, but of misguided attempt to accommodate clients. 99 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH11
Three-year suspension was
recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty
and fraud, made statement of material fact to tribunal which he knew or reasonably
should have known was false, and offered evidence that he knew to be false and
failed to take reasonable remedial measures. 96 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm.
SH 358.
Disbarment was recommended sanction
for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made false statements
of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew were false and engaged in
conduct which tended to defeat administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 877.
Censure was recommended sanction for
attorney who made statements of material fact or law known was false, and
engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice. 95
Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 504
One-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who made
statement of material fact which he knew was false in appearing in professional
capacity before tribunal, made a statement of material fact which he knew to be
false in course of representing client, and engaged in conduct involving
dishonesty. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. &
Disc.Comm. CH 191.
Disbarment was recommended sanction
for attorney who engaged in serious misconduct by making misrepresentation
during his divorce proceedings and who was a recidivist. 94 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH469
Fraud on court
Two-year suspension, retroactive to beginning of interim
suspension, was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of
material fact or law to tribunal which lawyer knew or reasonably should have
known to be false, instituted criminal charges as prosecutor when he knew or
reasonably should have known that charges were not supported by probable cause,
committed criminal act that reflected adversely upon lawyer ‘s honesty,
trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty,
fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaged in conduct prejudicial to
administration of justice, and engaged in conduct which tended to bring courts
or legal profession into disrepute. 96
Ill. Atty. Reg. & Disc. Comm. CH 118.
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Respondent Respectfully prays:
1.)
That
all court orders be VACATED due to them being a NULLITY based upon the reasons
cited in this document and noted in the Affidavits and appropriate Sanctions be
imposed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137:
2.) That the Chief Judge or
Presiding Judge summons Federal authorities to ascertain the criminal
allegations noted to determine what prosecutorial remedies are afforded in this
matter;
3.)
That Pursuant to Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional Debate of
the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than
that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any
“two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in
violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which
he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout
the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations
of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but
white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were
not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized
Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert
and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the
injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political
principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437
(remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these
societies”) et al.
“Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe,
supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking
abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been
visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been
found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And
the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford
protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
4.) That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful
combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et
al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the
conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall
become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a
rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
5.) That this
court collaborate and transfer certain parts of these issues where they may not
have jurisdiction on parties complicit in said conspiracies be charged with
terrorist acts to the Federal tribunal;
6.) That
Cook County Sheriffs along with Federal Officials be present until this matter
is properly adjudicated.
7.) That Alderman Edward Burke be Ordered not
to proceed any further selecting any more judges Instanter;
8.) That all Judges name and implicated be
Ordered to Recuse themselves pending an investigation for their roles recorded
in this document;
9.) That the Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause for
Remand for Perjury and “Fraud” for all parties complicit in these matters.
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Under
penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned
certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and
correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief
and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted,
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
PO Box
490075
Chicago,
IL 60649-0075
IN THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Jean M. Cocozza
Petitioner
)
) Cal 95
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent ) Room 15
MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 &
VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT”
JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE
CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO
SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said
motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the
statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated
to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Jean M. Cocozza
Petitioner
)
) Cal 95
VS )
)
No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room 1506
NOTICE OF
MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 &
VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT”
JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE
CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO
SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137
Please be
advised that on December 17 , 2018, Respondent
has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion to Reinstate Case 88 D 079012 et
al.; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Jean M. Cocozza or any Judge in her
stead Jan. 3, 2019 , at 10:30 am
in room 1506.
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
Chicago
Housing Authority
Wilson
Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of
the General Counsel
Christian
T. Novay
Asst
Gen Counsel
55
West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Maria
Sewell Joseph Chicago,
Il 60603
60 East
Van Buren
Chicago,
Ill 60605
Seyfarth
& Shaw
Jeffrey
K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris
,
Suite 2400
Chicago,
Ill. 60603
TO AAG
Tyler Roland Chief
Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
General
Law Bureau Presiding Judge Jacobius,
Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
100
West Randolph Street Suite 1300
Chicago,
Ill. 60601 Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite
1001, Chg. Ill.
Judge
M. L. Mikva Daley Center, Chg. Il 60601
States
Attorney, Kim Foxx, Daley Center, Chg.
Ill. 60601
Atty
Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of
State
Asst
Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst
Gen Counsel Terrence McConville
60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West
Randolph, Suite 500
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
CHA
Mobility
CHA
Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris
Klepper, Executive Dir
Tracey
Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East
Jackson Blvd.
4859
S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago,
Ill 60604
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
CHA
Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Jessie
McDaniel
4859 S.
Wabash
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
City
of Chicago, Department of Buildings
Christopher
Lynch
121 North
LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Cary
G. Schiff & Associates Gordon
& Rees LLP
Christopher
R. Johnson
Lindsay
Watson, Christian T. Novay
Yuleida
Joy
1
North Franklin, Suite 800
134 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1720
Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Courtesy
Copies:
Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Case 93
CV01609
219 S. Dearborn, Room 2341
Chicago, Ill. 60604
US Attorney
FBI
Dir. Chris Wray
John R.
Lausch, Jr. 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago,
Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon
Mark Kirk
Bruce
Rauner
607 East Adams, Suite 1520
100 West
Randolph, Suite
Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Mayor
Deputy
Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm
Emanuel
Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77
West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Hon
Dick Durbin
Judge
525 South
8th St.
Frederick
Bates
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
50
West Washington
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Judge
Celia C. Gamrath Judge
50 West
Washington Room 2508 Neil Cohen
50
West Washington Room 2308
Alderman
David Moore
Alderman Ed Burke
Alderwoman Carrie Austin
Alderwoman Emma Mitts
Cook
County President
Cook
County Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle
Thomas
J. Dart
118 N.
Clark, Room 517
Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on Dec 17 , 2018
A Motion to Reinstate Paternity case Due to “Fraud” 88 D 079012 et al, has been filed with the Circuit Court of
Cook County and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand
delivery or regular mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
Joe Louis
Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago, Ill 60649
312
965-6455
@joelouis7
No comments:
Post a Comment