"HOW NIGGER JUDGES HELP ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE DESTROY MEN OF COLOR"
READ HOW WILLIAM STEWART BOYD UNLAWFULLY DENIED MR. KABIR'S (F.O.I.) MOTION PROVING BLACK JUDGES ARE MERE FIGUREHEADS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AS HE HAD HIM REMANDED INTO CUSTODY AS HE USED HIS ROBE TO EXTORT 6880.00 FROM HIM.
BOYD HAS DEMONSTRATED IN HIS ACTIONS HE IS UNTOUCHABLE AND IMMUNE TO ANY ADMONISHMENTS BECAUSE HIS ACTIONS WERE PERPETRATED AGAINST A MAN OF COLOR.
SO THIS MOTION WAS PREPARED AND FILED IN FEDERAL COURT SEEKING TO HELP MY BROTHER BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY SEEMS TO LACK MEN OF COLOR WITH ANY INTEGRITY A HETEROSEXUAL BROTHER STANDING IN A SQUARE CIRCLE ARE VICIOUSLY ATTACKED AND DESTROYED IN THE COURTS AS DEMONSTRATED IN THIS DOCUMENT.
MR. KABIR HAS BEEN HUMILIATED AND ABUSED BY A MAN WHO IS USING HIS ROBE TO DESTROY HIM SIMPLY BECAUSE HE IS A MAN OF IMPECCABLE INTEGRITY AND CHARACTER AND BECAUSE BOYD IS NOT REFLECTIVE TO ANYTHING RELATABLE TO THAT OF A MAN--HE RESORTED TO HATE PROVING BLACK JUDGES ARE IN FACT IMPOTENT IN ANY AUTHORITY OVER WHITE ATTORNEYS.
HE HAS ACCEPTED THE POSITION AS BEING A WHORE OF INJUSTICE DISPENSATING THE LAWS FROM HIS PERSONAL PRIVATE SELF DARING THE FBI AND HONESTLY GIVING THE MIDDLE FINGER TO FEDERAL COURT AS A PSYCHOTIC INDIVIDUAL PROVING HE NEVER SHOULD HAVE HAD A JUDGES ROBE ON IN ANY CAPACITY.
BECAUSE SO MANY BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ARE ALLEGEDLY SLEEPING WITH RACIST JUDGES OR POLITICIANS MANY FEEL THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE BECAUSE OF THE INTIMATE DETAILS THEY ARE FAMILIAR WITH THAT PERSON.
THE WORSE PART MANY ARE LIVING AS NORMAL COUPLES WIFE, HUSBAND AND CHILDREN.
JUDGE NORGLE'S CLERK INFORMED ME VIA TELEPHONE THE HEARING WILL BE CANCELLED FRIDAY BUT HE IS ACCEPTING THE MOTION AND WILL BE MAKE A RULING AT ANOTHER DATE.
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
Joseph L.
Lawrence ) Hon Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
Plaintiff )
) 93 CV 01609
VS
)
)
Chicago Transit
Authority )
$33 Million Dollars
Defendant )
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se a United States Citizen born and
raised a Freeman by all governing laws of the United States Constitution,
Plaintiff in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, to show that because of numerous judges in Cook
County courts are “Trespassing upon the
Laws” acting as “Private Citizens”
no citizen in Illinois are able to receive Equal Protection of the Laws as long
as the present administration of law breakers are on the bench engaging in
“Treason Offenses”. Cook County judge William Stewart Boyd received Notice and knowledge of the Federal
motion before this court to Supplement that was accepted did not object or deny
any of the facts put before this court unlawfully Remanded said Plaintiff into
custody for $6800.00 by stating he was in “Contempt of Court”
Based
thereon Plaintiff respectfully moves that the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. allow said Motion to be supplemented.
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments
and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void;
and form
no bar to a recovery sought, even
prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification;
and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered,
in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol,1
Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not
have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a
judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are
engaged in treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him
any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state
officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
1.) That
on Dec. 17, 2018, hereto attached, Pages 2- 8 and Par 27 of Page 9 corroborate
and validate the verity that William Stewart Boyd never should have been a
judge due to his complicit involvement in an “Organized Conspiracy”
2.) That on Dec. Oct 18, 2018, out of
retaliation, rage and despicable self-racial hatred to his own ethnicity, he
unlawfully remanded Cazembe Kabir into Custody stating he was in Contempt of
Court” for not paying a shake down extortion fee of $6800.00, in the same
similar manner racist white judges did to the Plaintiff on the Bogus Paternity
3.) That “Private Citizen” Boyd is of the
impression that as long as he is hurting and shaking down African Americans or
those related, he is immune from any admonishments from any judge and has no
fear of this court’s jurisdiction.
4.) That from the Plaintiff’s Dec. 13, 2018
Courtesy Copy served upon him which a part of the exhibits in the Motion, that
Par 2 states, “She wants everyone reading
this document to know Black or Brown Judges have no authority over white
attorneys, he is instructed to do whatever he is told. Colen’s reply to the Motion
states “nor response filed”.
5.) That pursuant to Supreme Court Rules and
Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure attorney Joan S. Colen and Defendant
Bernadette Kabir has admitted to Perjury, Conspiracy and a plethora of “Fraudulent
Acts” in that, “Private Citizen”
Boyd became a law unto himself used his robe and violated his oath and became a
Terrorist by having the Cook County Sheriff to Remand innocent Plaintiff into
Custody informing the Deputies that said Plaintiff must have $6800.00 not 10% in order to be released and continued
said matter until Dec. 21, 2018.
6.) That Page 3, Par 9A amplifies the to the Petition to Reinstate Petition
for Dissolution of Marriage et al. states, “Petitioner asserts with authority and based on such information
and belief, demonstrate beyond the Preponderance of the evidence standard that
judge Boyd acted as a “Private Citizen”
and has “Trespassed
upon the laws”
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and
orders are regarded as
nullities. They are not voidable, but simply
void; and form no bar to a
recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in
opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v.
Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,
1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
7.) That it is alleged so many Black or
Hispanic judge are sleeping with the same sex men judges who are racist but,
are intimate to these said men and women sleeping with the same sex women in the States Attorney Office or City
with authority to eradicate these issues are closing their eyes to the plethora
of Demonic Terrorist Acts perpetrated by said Democrats because so many of them
are living as Heterosexuals or with
children but is living in the closet, afraid that their identities will be
revealed if they open their mouths nobody is at all what they appear to be.
A- That
this is the United States of America people have a right to be with whom so
ever they love or care about but when your sexual or racial orientation
interferes with the Civil Liberties of any citizen Heterosexual or independent
in their political beliefs is when there is a problem as noted here in Cook
County.
B-
That in furtherance to the aforementioned, it is
going to take a Federal Judge to invoke it’s jurisdiction and authority in this
matter because Cook County is a criminal cesspool and there does not appear to
be a Democrat with any scintilla of integrity to avail itself from the alleged “Sodom” and “Gomorrah” style of
Racist Jim Crow laws being enforced as the United States Constitutional laws
are being circumvented making the Cook County Courts a successful criminal
enterprise.
C-
That Cook County Courts under the authority of
Timothy C. Evans meets and exceeds the legal standard of the Preponderance of
the Evidence corroborating Cook County judges engaging in acts of the criminal
enterprise. That Judges has either corroborated his role as an active
“Conspirator” with a Brazen disregard for the laws challenging said FBI Agents
following this case, that they are going to have to come and get him because
Democratic judges deem themselves “untouchable” That due
to the judges Bias and or Prejudice conduct
pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does
not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial
Canons to warrant removal for cause.” Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
D-
That it is clear no Hispanic or Black person described as a Democrat
in Cook County have any real authority where it matters especially as
demonstrated in this cause, “Jim Crow” laws are being enforced by spineless men
of color and racist men hiding behind men of color using them as the Enforcers
using the laws as weapons to Terrorize, Bully or “Lynch” anyone that challenges
said Democrats in these unlawful proceedings as articulated throughout all
pleadings and affidavits.
The
U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or
judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his
undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S.
1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any
judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United
States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the
Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
Having
taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution
of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge
who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of
treason (see below).
If a
judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are
void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is
without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
Judges
have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges
have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving
with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
Judicial immunity does not exist
for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid
and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages
sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with,
aiding and abetting, another judge's criminal activity.
WHEREFORE
the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Vacating the Remand of 2018 D 3208 deemed a
Nullity void Instanter;
2.
For an Order issuing a Rule
to Show Cause Remanding William S. Boyd and all other men and women complicit
in this “Organized Conspiracy into Custody Instanter.
3.
For an Order Removing William S. Boyd and
every person (s) from their positions due to acts as a “Private Citizen”
engaging in knowing acts of “Treason”
Civil Rights Act of 1866-
first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United
States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are
hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every
race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall
have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and
Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be
parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey
real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and
proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white
citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to
none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the
contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42
U.S.C.A. 1981 (a)
Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247)
C.C.D. Md. Maryland
That
no Afro American, Negroe, Black judge or
Politician male will step up and admonish whites complicit in said acts, they
go along with wrong so as to get along with the wrong doers which is why Chicago
is in the apathetic state it is in today can’t blame the white man for
everything too many blacks have sold out participating in the genocide and mass
incarceration of their own race so as to continuously fulfill the doctrines of
the Democratic Party;
The Mis
education of the Negroe, Carter G. Woodson 1933
History shows that it does not matter who is in power... those
who have not learned to do for themselves and must depend solely on others
never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they did in the
beginning.
Here is a quote from the book:
"When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry
about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder.
He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send
him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no
back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it
necessary.
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
Respectfully
Submitted,
___________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence,
Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago,
ILL 60649-0075
Email
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
Joe Louis
Lawrence
) Hon. Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
Plaintiff
)
) 93 CV 01609
VS )
)
Chicago Transit
Authority ) $33 Million Dollars
Defendant
)
NOTICE OF EMERGENCY
MOTION TO VACATE REMAND INSTANTER
(CASE 18 D 3208 CAZEMBE KABIR) DUE TO JUDGE WILLIAM S. BOYD TRESPASSING UPON
THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING HIS COURT ORDER “VOID” A “NULLITY”
SAID JUDGE PRESIDED OVER A CASE HE HAD NO JURISDICTION CORROBORATED HIS ROLE AS
A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” & ISSUANCE OF RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING HIM INTO
CUSTODY w/AFFIDAVIT
Please be advised that on, Dec 19, 2018 Plaintiff has filed before this District Court Emergency
Motion to Vacate Remand et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument
before any Judge in Judge Norgle’s stead Dec. 21, 2018, at 9:30 am in room 2341
General Counsel: Karen G. Seimetz Local
Union 241 Amalgamated Transit Union A.F.L.-C.I.O.-C.L.C.
President Keith Hill
Chicago Transit Authority 1613 S.
Michigan
Law Department Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Law Department Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60661
Courtesy
Copies:
Cook
County States Attorney
Cook
County Sheriff
Kim
Foxx
Thomas
J. Dart
50 West
Washington, Room 500
Richard J.
Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago,
Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Ill. 60602
US
Attorney
FBI Dir. Jeffrey S. Sallet
John
R. Lausch, Jr. 2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on December 19, 2018, An Emergency Motion to Vacate
Remand et al. has been filed with the Northern District of Illinois and said
copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular
mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago,
Ill 60649
312 965-6455
@joelouis
William S. Boyd
2508 Richard J. Daley
Center Room
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Case# 2018 D 003208
Room 1605
COURTESY
COPY
A MUST READ
Private Citizen William
S. Boyd: Dec. 13,
2018
Please find Plaintiff’s
1.)
Proof validating the verity attorney
Joan S. Colen admitting and being complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy”,
hereto attached, her Courtesy Copy signed and certified Dec. 10, 2018 personally
delivered Petitioners Motion to Reinstate et al.
2.)
She wants everyone reading this document
to know Black or Brown Judges have no authority over white attorneys, he is
instructed to do whatever he is told. Colen’s reply to the aforementioned
Motion states, “no response filed”.
3.)
Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional
Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d
1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129
et al.
4.)
Black and Brown judges in order that they maintain
their employment as Associate judges in order that Edward Burke reappoint them
they are to continuously engage in terrorist acts as “Trespassers of the Laws”
by acting as racist white people so as to be accepted by the Democratic
Political Machine.
Special note: This
matter be updated before Federal Judge Charles R. Norgle, Jr. showing Black and
Brown persons in authority are merely figureheads allowing “Jim Crow” acts to
permeate the legal system and destroy persons of color. No CTA attorney or any
attorney has ever responded to the factual assertions, Motion to Reinstate Case due to Democratic
judges/attorneys Trespassing upon the laws committing Treason acting as Private
Citizens et al. demonstrates the role Boyd played misrepresenting my brother
Joe Louis Lawrence as he has endured 30 years of racial injustice by Democratic
judges earning a spot as an associate judge.
The Seventh
Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal
enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985).
Court Hearing Dec. 18, 2018 at 9:30 am
Respectfully
Submitted,
________________________
Cazembe
O. Kabir
Pro Se
CC
Joan S. Colen jsc@joancolenlaw.com
FBI
Dir. Chris Wray
Chief
Judge Timothy C. Evans
US Atty John
R. Lausch, Jr.
States Attorney Kim Foxx
No comments:
Post a Comment