HATE AND RACISM IN THIS CITY WHICH IS SYNONYMOUS TO RACIAL SEGREGATION,, SEXISM VIOLENCE, RACIAL GENOCIDE, HOUSING DISCRIMINATION, MASS INCARCERATION, PUBLIC SCHOOL CLOSINGS,
TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT HOW THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO CIRCUMVENT ALL LAWS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IN VIOLATING PEOPLE OF COLOR CIVIL RIGHTS AS WELL AS INDEPENDENT CAUCASIANS BY APPOINTING AND INSTALLING THE NECESSARY INFERIOR COLORED PERSONS TO POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY ABSENT REAL AUTHORITY AS THEY CONTINUE TO ENFORCE #JIMCROWLAWS.
THE DEMOCRATS OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE EMBRACE A HATRED TOWARDS ANY HETEROSEXUAL MAN OR WOMAN THAT STANDS FOR RACIAL EQUALITY OR CIVIL LIBERTIES AND HAVE THE NECESSARY JUDGES IN POSITION TO MAKE SURE NO ONE RISES ABOVE THEIR TERRORISTS DOCTRINES.
DON'T HAVE SOME INTELLIGENCE AND AN INDEPENDENT MIND BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO USE ROPES OR SIC DOGS ON YOU THEY USE THE LAWS AS WEAPONS UNLAWFULLY TO OPPRESS ANYONE SEEKING RESTITUTION OR RELIEF IN ANY COURT.
LEE OTIS LOVE, JR. HAVE BEEN FIGHTING DILIGENTLY TO BE IN HIS DAUGHTERS LIFE BUT BECAUSE OF THE VERY RACISM THAT GOVERNS THIS CITY JUDGES HAVE CRIMINALIZED HIM CAUSING HIM TO LOSE HIS JOBS DUE TO REPEATEDLY GOING BACK AND FORTH TO COURT FIGHTING BASELESS CHARGES OF DOMESTIC ABUSE.
HE IS NOT ALONE MY BLOG DEMONSTRATES IN AN ARTICULATE MANNER THE NECESSARY METHODS RACIST OLD SCHOOL DEMOCRATS ARE WILLING TO EXHAUST TO DEMORALIZE AND DESTROY FAMILIES OF COLOR TO DEMONSTRATE THEIR SUPERIORITY OVER ALL ETHNIC GROUPS.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU VOTE DEMOCRATIC IN CHICAGO.
UPDATE: THE CHIEF JUDGE (DIANE P. WOOD) SEPT. 27, 2016 ALLEGEDLY ISSUED A ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT ON IRISH JUDGE JOHN W. DARRAH PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.352 (b) (1) (A) (iii) ACCORDING TO THE MEMORANDUM OF CHIEF JUDGE THAT IS NOT SIGNED "THE COMPLAINT IS THAT THE JUDGE IS BIASED AGAINST THE COMPLAINANT. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY BIAS BY THE JUDGE".
THE COURT IGNORED ALL OF THE FACTS NOT REBUTTED BY ANY OPPOSING COUNSEL IN THE SEPTEMBER 2, 2016 POST.
THIS IS NOT #DONALDTRUMP IN OFFICE PERPETRATING THESE AREAS OF INJUSTICE AND GOVERNOR RAUNER SENT A LETTER STATING THESE ARE MATTERS FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THAT HIS OFFICE HAS NO JURISDICTION ON THESE ISSUES.
THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF HOW DEMOCRATS REALLY FEEL TOWARDS PEOPLE OF COLOR BUT DURING ELECTIONS #BLACKANDBROWNLIVES ONLY MATTER FOR THEIR VOTES.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16 CV 7434
Hon: John W.Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago
Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2
Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human
Relations Supreme Court
of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,
Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
MOTION DISQUALIFICATION
OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE{28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF JULY
21, 2016 & SEPTEMBER 9, DUE TO FRAUD/ERROR
To the Honorable Justices
of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals:
Complainant
a United States Citizen, Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel
Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted
reasons why this matter should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure
and LR40.1 (b) (d) (e3)} with Affidavit.
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144,
to show that the Honorable John Darrah, has a personal bias with compelling
evidence or prejudice against him because of his skin color and where legally
sufficient Complaint stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction;
motions corroborating judicial corruption “fraud” “perjury” and a plethora of
“Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the court that the District Court
ignored and described them as moot upholding Racism and Terrorism in the
courts.
That said judge is demonstrating
unequivocally this is how traditional Democrats of the Political Machine in his
era and beyond feels towards persons of color and the necessary steps he and
his brethren are willing to enforce keeping persons of color like the Plaintiff
oppressed and treated as a criminal non United States Citizen; and is
attempting to cover up the systemic legal applications of racism that Appellant
has diligently put before the courts, where judges and lawyers have participated
in said conspiracies and have admitted it pursuant to all laws recorded.
Based thereon, Plaintiff-Appellant respectfully moves that the Honorable
John Darrah proceed no further herein and that this Honorable Seventh Circuit
invoke jurisdiction; due to members of the Democratic Political Machine seizing
control over all courts and certain judges politically appointed because of
their racist hatred of ethnic groups they deem inferior to them so as to enforce the laws pursuant to the United States
Constitution who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the laws in
accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure to hear this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear
reprisals from these individuals.
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files
herewith his affidavit as required by Title
28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I
Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have
on this day filed said Notice of Motion for Disqualification of judge et al. Before
the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.
To:
Dir. James Comey, FBI Washington D.C.
FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West
Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
US Attorney, Zachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500
Commander
& Chief
Attorney
General of United States
President
Barack Obama
Loretta
Lynch
The White House
U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chief Judge Timothy Evans
Judge
Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600
50
West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Judge Mary Lane Mikva
Clerk
of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite
50
West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan
Asst.
Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
100
West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
States
Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center,
Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State
Patricia
Rios, CHA Chief Adm. Officer
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville 60
East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CHA Housing Choice Partners
CHA
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir.
Kathryn
Ludwig, Chief HCV Officer
401 S. La Salle, Suite 1105
60
East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill 60605
Chicago, Ill. 60605
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Eugene
Jones, Jr. CEO
Jessie McDaniel
CHA
401 S. La Salle, Suite 1105
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill. 60605
Chicago,
Ill. 60605
City of Chicago, Department of Buildings
Christopher Lynch
121 North LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris, Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Sara Eber
Fowler Suite 2400
131 South Dearborn
Chicago, IL. 60603
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King,
James Bebley,
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, IL. 60605
Cary
G. Schiff & Associates Gordon
& Rees LLP
Christopher
R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Rahimi Goli
134 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1720
1 North
Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
Lewis
Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Christian
Novay
Chicago, Ill. 60603
550
West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago,
IL. 60661
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren
420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz,
Sales
Consultant
Sarah Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio
420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Chicago,
Ill. 60611
John-Paul
Loseto,
Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Father
Michael Pfleger
Chicago, Ill. 60611
St.
Sabina
1210
West 78th Pl.
Courtesy Copies:
Chg.
Il 60620
US
Attorney
FBI
Dir. Michael J. Anderson
Zachary
T. Fardon
2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago,
Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604
Leo
High School President/Sun Times
Columnist Dan McGrath
Hon Judge Neil Cohen
7901
S. Sangamon
50 West Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago,
Il 60620
Chicago, Ill 60601
Mayor
Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel ANTONIO R. RILEY
City Hall
77
West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon
Mark Kirk
525 South
8th St.
607
East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Bruce
Rauner
Alderman
David Moore
100 West
Randolph
Alderman Ed Burke
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Alderwoman Emma Mitts
Cook County President
Cook
County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas
J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517
Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Hon
Dick Durbin
Hon
Judge
525 South
8th St.
Frederick Bates
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
50
West Washington
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on September 15, 2016, A Motion to Disqualify et al has been filed before the
United States Court of Appeals.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
PO
Box 490075
Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
312 -965-6455
@joelouis7
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
AFFIDAVIT
In support of Motion to Disqualify et al.
In
support of Motion
To Disqualify John W. Darrah,
Judge of the Northern District of Illinois for Personal Bias or Prejudice
“FRAUD” pursuant to 28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal
Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
Section
1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon
3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;
I am Joe
Louis Lawrence, Heterosexual
Man Born and Raised a Free MAN
Counsel Pro Se, HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES DENIED IN ALL COURTS BUT NEVER TRIED
being duly sworn on oath states:
1.)
That on July 21,
2016, Plaintiff filed his Complaint
stating all claims why the Federal Court had jurisdiction on said matter and it
was assigned to Judge Darrah;
2.)
That Judge Darrah purportedly erred in his original
interpretation of the Complaint being properly filed with claims being clearly
articulated;
3.)
That said errors culminated into a pattern of
consistent Bias Acts when the proper Motion for Reconsideration et al. was
filed August 31, 2016 demonstrating his errors, hereto attached as Gr Ex A;
Judge Darrah has history with the
Plaintiff and has attacked his Pleadings in a prior case involving government
corruption:
A-
That judge
Darrah had a vexatious Bias and Racial Hatred at the Plaintiff on case 2011 CV 6887 where then he
recorded false entries, 1.) said judge stated Plaintiff filed a Complaint Oct.
7, 2011 when in fact the Complaint was filed September 30, 2011, 2.) the judge
stated, John W. Darrah made gross fabrications
about the Appellant’s documents filed before the court which are unfounded, he
says “it is impossible to discern from
Plaintiff’s rambling” et al
B-
That during this
time judge Darrah refused to honor Plaintiff’s Informa Pauperis Petition whereby
the United States Court of Appeals ordered him to rule on said petition;
C-
Plaintiff filed a Motion to Disqualify said judge
10-27-2011, Judge Darrah denied the
motion about himself did not have said motion reassigned;
D-
That judge Darrah exhausted every method possible using
his robe as a Klansmen making sure he did not access the jurisdiction of the
Federal Court by ruling on said orders prior keeping him presenting himself
before the court on the motion call, so as to demonstrate his articulation of all
legal applications germane to said matter.
Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the
depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law
by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573,
especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was
thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the
depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d
124, 55 Alr 2d 505
4.) That Gr
Ex A was scheduled for September 15, at 9:30 only because said judge was
not entertaining any motions for August;
5.) Plaintiff was
prepared to present this Motion on July 25, 2016 when the case was assigned anticipating
he was going to unlawfully dismiss said Complaint for “Fraudulent” reasons, but was advised to allow him to “Hang” himself but to file the
matter before the Court of appeals not the Executive –Committee;
6.) That Gr Ex A on its face met the legal
burden Preponderance of the evidence demonstrating Judge Darrah had no legal
grounds not granting Plaintiff’s Petition to proceed informa pauperis and order the United States Marshall’s to effect
service on all noted parties because the
Complaint met the burden of having a claim ;
A- That Page 5 Par A, “Plaintiff was already informed by credible intel no Irish, Polish and
Black male judges were going to rule in his favor etal.”
B- That in furtherance
to the aforementioned, Plaintiff appeared before Politically Appointed Cook
County Associate judge Valderrama given the circumstances intimately connected
to both judges, in that Valderrama violated the oath of his duties engaged in a
plethora of Criminal Terrorists Acts ref as Gr Ex B knowing that he had no jurisdiction over the Plaintiff in
any State Court ignored the fact he was under Federal jurisdiction made it
clear to the attorney preparing the order, Page
2 Par D, “The court finds there is no
just reason for delay”
C- That judge Darrah
has demonstrated in his actions conspiring with judge Valderrama when he
expeditiously Denied, (Ref as Ex C)
both Gr Ex A and Gr Ex B only after Plaintiff filed Gr Ex B;
D- One can infer that
Valderrama’s untouchable arrogance is of the flair he has because of his
intimate relations with certain racist white men “Organized in said
Conspiracy”,
E- That there is a
particular mindset of the noted conspirators involved in these matters is that,
they share a deep seeded hate for
certain women especially men of color and independent Caucasians who are
Heterosexual;
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful
act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on
remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat
to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of,
individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation,
intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally
all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728
(Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of
Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional
rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for
improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution
which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants basic constitutional
rights;
F- That Ex
C demonstrates the need for the Justices of the United Court States ofAppeals
to invoke jurisdiction in this matter because the present legal system is in
the hands of Domestic Terrorists who have infiltrated the Democratic Political
Machine and is enforcing Jim Crow
laws with their appointed brethren also known as “Good ol Boys” using Afro American Negroes who have allowed
themselves to be whored out as prostitutes upholding the criminal acts of said
Terrorists while everyone in responsible authority turn their heads and close
their eyes to the crimes perpetrated on innocent persons of color and
independent whites as demonstrated in
this case and it is alleged many have secret intimate relations with said
individuals and will never open their mouths about whatever injustices being
perpetrated on innocent persons of color;
G- That the sad
reality is that many in power who could have effected a change long time ago is
not at all what they purportedly presented themselves to be to the public when
in fact no Real Man or Woman would be caught up in this mess;
H- That most
importantly, there has not been one attorney to stand in any court and object
to any judge or in any legal document that the Plaintiff is in error in his
pleadings in that a former Assistant States Attorney now deceased who
repeatedly threatened the Plaintiff;
I-
That
Par 2 Page 18 Petition for Rule
to Show Cause (filed Oct. 12, 2011) ignored by Judge Darrah and Denied That
Lawyers were forewarned by certain judges not to challenge the Pro Se
Plaintiff, in that Judges were to handle anything and everything he filed in
the courts because they deemed themselves “untouchable”, for example, Assistant
States Attorney Brian Volkman told Judge David Haracz, “Your honor, we have tried everything on him (Plaintiff) and nothing
seems to work, I have never seen a person from the public prepare pleadings
like him, I don’t know what else to do”
7.) That Judge Darrah
and Valderrama were so busy leveling frivolous attacks at his character and
pleadings neither judge took the time out to deny any of the facts properly
asserted in all affidavits attesting to the veracity of everything properly
plead; thereby, trapping themselves as Terrorist best described as Weapons of
Mass destruction;
A- That Plaintiff had
an objective that was to perfect the record and Complaint so that it can be
perfectly presented to the Court of Appeals and United States Supreme Court,
there is not one attorney under Rahm Emanuel’s administration or the States
authority who can come before this court or any court and impeach the merits of
this document or the complaint;
B- That because the
FBI didn’t want the Plaintiff wearing a wire because everyone talks and shares
with him so it was necessary to exercise creativity using affidavits from there
traps within the laws became so effective trapping attorneys the next step was
to try it on judges.
C- The reason why this
operation was so successful because Racist White Men Gay and otherwise don’t
either know the law but they are appointed to the bench, they don’t read the laws when it involves persons of
color because their lives don’t matter and in some instances don’t feel the
need to know the laws because when the “FIX”
is in there is no need to know the law because that is the Chicago way whatever
a white man does or says is right even when he is wrong or they simply deny
anything and everything a great attorney
may present before their court wearing down anyone economically or by
intimidating attorneys;
D- Plaintiff’s
Complaint is the Blue Print on how cases are fixed and how the government can
effectively prosecute every person complicit in overthrowing the courts using
their legal expertise as a weapon against the indigent, the weak on ethnic
groups they feel superior to as demonstrated in said pleadings;
E- Finally, Plaintiff
was informed that there were judges in the Court of Appeals who surprisingly
believed in him dispatched word to his attention via court personnel if he
wanted to change the existing laws in Illinois and the Courts, he had to
present a Brief not a Motion who ever this person is or was they played chess.
Plaintiff has labored tirelessly perfecting
this Complaint so as to avenge his brother’s death a Chicago City employee who
everyone loved was slain in a Terrorist manner shot up and body set on fire in
(Morgan Park ) an attempt to cover-up the crime while it is my strongest
opinion Valderrama had something to do with my brother Man was fatally shot before Morgan Park home exploded in suspicious
fire http://fw.to/MohLP5Y Timothy
David Lawrence being killed (September 14, 2015) Thomas B. King of the CHA
shared condolences and a host of others in the Daley Center after seeing my
interview on the news.
That with a surveillance camera in the back
of the house capturing the identities of the murderer’s, police have no
suspects!
8.) That this Honorable
seventh Circuit will be able to see unequivocally, that said complaint filed
July 21, 2016 met and satisfied all legal standards being before this Federal
Jurisdiction;
A- That if this case
remained before Judge John Darrah he would deny this complaint and exhaust the
same errors as demonstrated in the prior case because Black and Brown lives
don’t matter under his jurisdiction.
Civil
Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That
all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United
States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any
previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same
right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce
contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease,
sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit
of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and
penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or
custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14
Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
In the
20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on
constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the
court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court
in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in
interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce
clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities
were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy
v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This
landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart
v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs
v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County
School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington,
D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe).
These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State
Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP
v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960),
slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As the color
line itself solidified at the turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed
on black people clear tactical disadvantages: restricted economic
possibilities, narrow educational opportunities, inadequate housing options,
high rates of death and disablement, persistent unemployment, and unrelenting
poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow represented the race problem described by Gunnar
Myrdal (1898–1987) in
his 1944 treatise The American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that
created the race quandary; whites constructed the obstacles African Americans
confronted, while also blaming them for their conditions, denying them access
to the resources of problem solving, and daring them—under threat of violence—to complain, protest, or advance.
Finally,
protests or challenges to Jim Crow often proved futile, given law enforcement’s complicity in the structure. From
emancipation to the turn of the century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a
paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders,
red shirts, and other white terrorists intimidated African Americans with
personal attacks, school burnings, and lynching’s. African Americans rarely
served as policemen, sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the
1950s and 1960s, the connections between municipal and state governments, law
enforcement, and racial violence were well known by officials and citizens
alike. White officers were known to harass black people, disrupt black
neighborhoods, and assault black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied
satisfactory counsel, and serving harsh sentences, African Americans were
further disadvantaged in the courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel,
nor could they serve on juries. When black lawyers could appear in the
courtroom to argue cases, white judges and juries rarely listened. All-white
juries decided against black defendants, even in the most obvious cases of
innocence, but rarely convicted white defendants, despite evidence of guilt.
African Americans—including
the innocent—suffered
the harsher punishments of extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage.
Even women could be placed on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks
across the South.
The
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois
Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna
Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It
is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago
is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The
two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City
Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no
other State can match us.”
Turner 24 F.
Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in
what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The
plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her
former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an
apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the
same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being
transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted
a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in
fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of
the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
9.) That
said case demonstrates multiple acts of systemic applications of constitutional
violations, in that judges and State Agencies acted as decision makers
possessing final authority, Brown v. Bryan County, OKL., 67 F. 3d 1174 (1995),
Stokes v. Bullins, 844 F. 2d 269, 275 (5th Cir. 1988), Wassum v.
City of Bellaire, Texas, 861 F. 2d 453, 456 (5th Cir. 1988),
Benavides v. County of Wilson, 955 F. 2d 968, 972 (5th Cir.) cert.
denied,__ U.S.__, 113 S.Ct. 79, 121 L. Ed. 2d 43 (1992), “Liability will accrue
for the acts of a municipal official when the official possess “final
policymaking authority” to establish municipal policy with respect to the
conduct that resulted in a violation of constitutional rights. Pembaur v. City
of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S. Ct. 1292, 1300, 89 L.Ed. 2d 452
A-
That not one African American, Negroe or anyone in
competent authority opened their mouths to admonish anyone associated in these
deliberate heinous acts perpetrated by members of the Democratic Political
Machine, due to them only being figureheads.
10.)
That all Defendants have properly admitted to all facts
and pleadings recorded in said complaint.
11.)
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
CANON 1
A judge should uphold the integrity and
independence of the judiciary.
The
integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without
fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with
the law, as well as provisions of this code. Public confidence in the
impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to
this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public
confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government
under law.
Wherefore the Foregoing
Reasons,
Plaintiff Prays for the following
relief:
1.) Plaintiff requests that
this Honorable Court of Appeals accept Jurisdiction of this matter and Invoke
authority Instanter and reassign this matter accordingly and or due to the
unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights said attorneys and judges are complicit
in, Order a Rule to Show Cause for
Remands and Indictments on all parties associated in said conspiracies;
2.) Impose Sanctions/Remands against and all
parties for Contempt of the United States Constitution for their crimes against
the Plaintiff/Government and the immediate housing of Plaintiff where said
Defendants who took his Deposit money 420
East Ohio and K2 Apartments and
never returned it because he was the wrong skin color to live in their
buildings;
A- Judge
Frederick Bates
can testify to this he was the Hearing Officer who ruled in his favor twice
returning his voucher (9727767) he is now a County judge CHA ignored his authority
because of his skin color retaliated upon Plaintiff for complaining rescinded
his voucher again keeping him homeless.
B- In
furtherance to the above, Crain’s Business article Poor families use
'supervouchers' to rent in city's priciest buildings
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20140726/ISSUE01/307269984 via
@crainschicago This applied only to Caucasians with political clout and money;
C- The CHA’s
‘supervoucher’ program: a desegregation strategy that never was
http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/cha-supervoucher-program-fair-housing-integration-controversy/Content?oid=21891804
3.) Issue an Injunction on
the Chicago Housing Authority prohibiting from allowing anyone from accessing
or authorizing the distribution of any vouchers because they were complicit in
obstructing Plaintiff’s accessibility in living in Mobility Housing areas because
of his skin color and the fact he did not pay $1000-$1500 for his voucher, that
CHA unlawfully took his voucher because he did not move in Englewood or Auburn
Gresham when his 716 credit scored qualified him to live anyplace he desired as
a former resident of Cabrini Greens;
4.) Issue an Order
authorizing an Audit of the CHA Mobility of all ethnic individuals living in
exclusive units where the CHA is paying rents and the what portion of rents
being absorbed by African Americans and Caucasians;
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”;
Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated
rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government
can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore
those very same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody
Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page
1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press
writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for
corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America,
Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois
Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the
governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FURTHER
AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
NOTARY
Respectfully
Submitted
Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrence
312 965-6455
PO
Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
@joelouis7
No comments:
Post a Comment