WHITE MEN IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAVE BEEN LYING FALSIFYING POLICE REPORTS DESTROYING RECORDS KILLING AND DESTROYING INNOCENT LIVES FRAMING INNOCENT PEOPLE OF COLOR AND ONLY EMPLOYED THOSE BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS WHO WERE INFERIOR WITH A POST SLAVE MENTALITY TO CONTINUE TO ENFORCE THEIR DEMOCRATIC DOCTRINES ON THEIR OWN RACE.
IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE LAQUAN MCDONALD KILLING WHERE WHITE MEN ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE FALSIFICATION OF A POLICE REPORT SUPPORTING THE KILLING OF AN INNOCENT MAN.
TYPICALLY A BLACK PERSON IN AUTHORITY IN CHICAGO DO NOT HELP PEOPLE OF COLOR WILL NOT HELP A PERSON OF COLOR IF RACISM IS INVOLVED SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY RACIST WHITE MEN IN THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE THEY EMULATE WHAT THEIR WHITE MASTERS INSTRUCT THEM TO DO.
OTIS LEE LOVE, JR. +RedBilla HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SEEK AND HAVE CUSTODY OF HIS NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER JUDGE LOZA REALIZING HOW THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FEELS TOWARDS INTELLIGENT OUTSPOKEN MEN OF COLOR HAVE INSTALLED HER PERSONAL HATRED AGAINST AN INNOCENT MAN KEEPING HIM FROM HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH HIS NATURAL BIOLOGICAL CHILD AS IF THIS IS A CONTROLLED PLANTATION.
CORRUPT RACIST OR INCOMPETENT JUDGES WILL ALLOW VIOLENT GANG BANGERS BACK ON THE STREET SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE TO TERRORIZE THE COMMUNITIES.
THE SAME BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES WHO ARE NOT IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS KILLING INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR ARE IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, JUDGES OR POLICE OFFICERS ARE USING THEIR INFLUENCE AND POWER INFLICTING GENOCIDE ON THEIR OWN RACE IN THE NAME OF SUPPORTING THE RACIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU VOTE DEMOCRATIC IN #CHIRAQ AND NEGROES AND RACIST WHITES IN CHICAGO DON'T WANT AMERICA TO READ HOW #BLACKANDBROWNLIVESDONTMATTER IN CHICAGO ILLINOIS.
THIS CASE WAS FILED AUGUST 31, 2016.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16-cv-7434
Hon: John
W. Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
Of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDER OF
AUGUST 8TH DUE TO DELIBERATE ERROR BIAS/AND OR PREJUDICE
Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se a United States Citizen
born and raised a freeman by all governing laws of the United States
Constitution, Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required
by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144 to show that the Honorable John W.
Darrah has erred considerably or has a personal bias against the Plaintiff with
compelling evidence in an attempt to prevent him “equal access” to the Federal
Court’s jurisdiction;
Based thereon Plaintiff respectfully moves that the Honorable John W.
Darrah Reconsider said Motion and have the United States Marshall’s to effect
service on all parties herein Vacate the August 8, 2016 order.
1.) That the Court
Order states Par. 2 STATEMENT
“The court views the complaint’s allegations in a light most favorable
to the plaintiff, draws all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff,
and takes as true all well- pleaded facts and allegations in the complaint.
Reger Dev., LLC v. Nat’l City Bank, 592 F. 3d 759, 764 (7th Cir.
2010). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 (a) (2) requires “a short and
plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” in
order to provide the defendant with fair notice of the plaintiff’s claims and
the grounds upon which they rest. Bell Atl. V. Twombly, 550, U.S. 544, 555
(2007). To survive a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s claim must be
plausible, and the factual allegations of the complaint must be “enough to
raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Brooks v. Ross, 578 F. 3d
574, 581 (7th Cir. 2009) (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555)
2.) That in
reference to the above legal citation and judge’s order, Plaintiff has
satisfied the aforementioned within the Complaint
A-
Complainant a United States Citizen, Joe Louis
Lawrence, hereby
Respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se
shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted reasons
why this matter should be within this court’s Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to (A)
Color (Title V11 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981)
(B) Race (Title V11 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981)
Racial
Discrimination, Racial Retaliation, Racial Hatred, Racial Oppression, Civil
Rights Violations, Unequal Applications of the Laws, and Disparate Treatment on
the basis of race, color or national origin (42 U.S.C. 1981).
This court has Jurisdiction over the statutory
violation alleged as conferred as follows: over Title V11 claims by U.S.C. {1331, 28 U.S.C. {1343 (a) (3), and 42
U.S.C. {2000e-5 (F) (3); over 42 U.S.C. {1981 and {1983 by 42 U.S.C. {1988;
over the A.D.E.A. by 42 U.S.C. {12117}.
In addition, alleged violations of the noted Sections of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871
all noted Public Officials with authority closed their eyes to the enumerated
crimes within.
B- That
Par 1, of the affidavit unequivocally within the preponderance of the evidence
legal standard addresses the legal standard why said Complaint should not have
been dismissed due to judges error;
C- In
furtherance to the above, Vol 1, Gr Ex A, Motion for Reconsideration &
Vacate June 1, 2016 Order Absent Certification Due to “Fraud” Pursuant to
Supreme Court Rule 272 with Affidavit filed before the Illinois Supreme Court;
3.) Said judge
demonstrated an incredible egregious error by ignoring the very complaint that
provided various claims as to why the Federal Court have jurisdiction in this
matter, he literately turned his back on
the complaint, closed his eyes to the plethora of Racists Civil Rights
violations perpetrated at the plaintiff;
The judge erred by demonstrating an act of culpability and or Conspiracy in an
attempt to aid and assist certain Defendant’s named in the Suit, In Re Judge No. 93-154, 440 S.E.2d 169
(Ga. 1994), And Deception by falsifying reasons for preventing a legally
sufficient Complaint, from being served on the Defendant’s, In re Ferrara, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich.
1998),In re Renfer, 493 S.E. 2d 434 (N.C. 1997), In re Kroger, 702 A. 2d 64
(Vt. 1997), Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 33 Cal. 3d 359, 657
P. 2d 372, 377, 188 Cal. Rptr. 880 (1983);
4.) That because
of the number of Racist Corrupt Judges fraternally connected to the Democratic Political Machine,
Plaintiff had to construct a Complaint that was Federally approved pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (d)(1)
(“No technical form is required”), While there is ample room for creativity in
drafting the complaint, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require the
inclusion of a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the
action, the case number, and a designation of the nature of the pleading. Form
1, in the Appendix to the Rules, is the model for case caption. A complaint
also must include the names of the parties to the suit, jurisdictional
statement, a plain and concise statement of the claim, and a prayer for relief.
A- Par 4
of Gr Ex A states, “That Ex B, is a
court order purportedly from the Illinois Supreme Court without certification
acknowledging any judges involvement but is the modis operandi when cases are
being “FIXED” judges never sign their names to court orders”.
B- Plaintiff is up against
6 law firms with personnel surpassing 20+attorneys the same methodology the
Democrats of the Ku Klux Klan exercised in the past “Lynching” innocent men of color hiding their faces behind
white robes is now blatantly demonstrating the same hatred in this manner using
Terrorist tactics with no fear of any laws expecting their brethren to uphold
them in these criminal episodes;
C- That Par 5B “Ed Burke approached Judge
Cieslik and told him to withdraw from the case. When the judge refused to
withdraw from the case, he told the judge. What’s
the big deal? It’s only a Fucking Nigger.” and Par C, Anne Burke also requested that the judge withdraw from
the case saying “My husband was the
one who put you on the bench.” is plain and concise no attorney or
judges denied or objected to said factual pleadings;
D- Motions
for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly
discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes
in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co.
of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665
N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
E- The
purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made
and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill.
App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
5.) That
Irish and certain Polish judges rule along racist fraternal guidelines and as
far as certain Negroe judges with Post era slavery mentalities, they rule how
they are told with no backbone or integrity; said hate is so strong it is
likened to the same hatred Hitler had towards Jews, likened to the same hatred demonstrated
at Native Americans forcing them off the United States soil sending them to
reservations now in this era Racist Democrats of the Political Machine are
destroying persons of color in the same aforementioned manner ignoring the very
laws designed by the United States Constitution to protect them using the laws
as weapons against the innocent to destroy them;
6.) That said Terrorist
have demonstrated taking seize of the legal system as demonstrated in said
Complaint ignoring Equal Protection of Laws for all United States citizens, in
that Chief Judge Negroe Timothy Calvin Evans ordered the removal of Judge
Valerie E. Turner, hereto attached, Chicago Tribune article August 17, 2016 veteran
Cook County Circuit Court judge allegedly allowed a lawyer who is running for
election to the bench this fall to wear a robe and hear cases at the Markham
courthouse late last week, a breach of judicial ethics as well as a potential
violation of the law.
The move
prompted the county's chief judge, Timothy Evans, to remove the judge from the
bench Wednesday until further notice.
The
incident occurred in the Markham courtroom of Judge Valarie Turner, who
allegedly allowed lawyer Rhonda Crawford to take her place on the bench, Evans
said in a statement. Crawford, an employee in Evans' office, presided over at
least two cases Aug. 11, both of them traffic cases. One involved a ticket for
driving without insurance, the other for driving on the median.
7.) That the Chief
Judge nor any prosecutors ordered the removal of any Judge in Springfield or
any law clerks for committing a felonies offense mailing out a blank court
orders Ex B et al.
.
8.) Because said
women are African American with no political clout it is easier going after
them instead of white men politically connected;
9.) Pursuant to Vol II, Gr Ex C, Page 9 of 18, Par. 6, “That Plaintiff has
prepared said pleadings so as to trap any judge under Alderman Edward Burkes
authority and control it was expected a top Irish or Good ol Boy personnel
judge would be presiding over this matter trying to “FIX” this case, so as to demonstrate to the most racist or
hated judges on the bench they can be caught within the law.”
A- “Plaintiff was already informed by credible Intel no
Irish, Polish and Black male judges were going to Rule in his favor where this
matter was concerned for example when this case appeared on Judge David Atkins
call he had Dismissed the case calling it an Order of Protection and got off
after he was allegedly admonished;"
10.)
To further amplify how judges are forum-shopped to
“FIX” cases unless you’ve got the clout to get a prestigious courtroom
assignment, Pethers says, being a judge in this county is “demoralizing” and
often leaves you “bored out of your mind.” In an email last month titled “Hanging Up the
Robe,” Pethers announced her plan to retire at the end of her term in
December and said she’ll leave the $187,000-a-year job with few regrets.
The email reads a bit like a law-and-order version of chef Anthony
Bourdain’s “Kitchen Confidential,” with accusations that unnamed colleagues in
the Cook County judiciary are often mailing it in.
Sure, there are “real upsides” to being a judge here, Pethers
says.
“Good pay, great benefits, lots of vacation,” wrote Pethers, 58.
She says she also enjoyed working with some of her fellow
judges, resolving disputes and explaining the legal system to non-lawyers who
file cases without an attorney.
But Pethers found it particularly depressing that “there are
judges who regularly don’t even come to work, but get to choose their
courtrooms,” according to the email sent to friends and colleagues.
Pethers came to realize she never had a shot at presiding over a
courtroom in the Law Division. She worked almost her entire career as an
attorney in the Law Division and aspired to sit in judgment there, she says.
“For years, I have watched folks elected long after me get
assignments I wanted,” says Pethers, who became the county’s first openly
lesbian judge when she was elected in 2004. “Some of them, although not on the
bench as long as me, were at least as qualified for the positions. Others, not
so much.”
Pethers clearly blames her failure to enjoy upward career
mobility on a lack of political influence: “Being ‘nobody who nobody sent’
doesn’t cut it. And because of that, qualification and experience don’t
either.”
She doesn’t name any of the allegedly better-clouted colleagues
who were promoted unfairly over her. But Pethers put the blame for the
situation squarely on longtime Chief Judge Timothy Evans.
The rest apparently is a distasteful snore: “I have spent 12
years throwing people out of their homes in evictions, placing judgments
against poor people who cannot pay their credit card and student loan debts and
dealing with lousy insurance companies in fender-bender car accident cases. And
the occasional breach of contract, slip and fall or dog bite.”
Now, she sees she had been “so naïve” when striving for a
judgeship.
“A well-known ‘mover and shaker’ told me when I was campaigning
that, if I thought an election was political, ‘Wait until you’re a judge —
there’s no place in Chicago more political than that,'” Pethers says. “I didn’t
understand that then, but I sure do now.” Chicago Sun Times August 2, 2016
11.)
That Par, 3, STATEMENT “Plaintiff alleges that he was unable to secure
housing and maintain employment because of actions by the Defendants. He
alleges that this occurred because individuals, state agencies and the court
system have committed terrorist acts, conspired against and oppressed the
Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s bare assertions of constitutional and civil rights
violations are conclusory and are not assumed to be true. See Ashcroft v.
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 681 (2009). Plaintiff does not assert facts supporting his
claims.”
Black’s Law definition Conclusory- An inference that has no proof but is stated
none the less.
If Plaintiff made
assertions that said black male judges were intimate with racist white men in
the Democratic Political Machine and has sold out destroying their own race,
due to self-hatred is all the reasons why the communities and court system is
in this pitiful corrupt state is deemed Conclusory;
Plaintiff’s
Complaint is corroborated with Affidavits, Admissions and Facts:
A- Pursuant to Par. 4, Page 11 from the Complaint
Plaintiff’s license was
never suspended because there was never a signed court order stating he owed
any child support but was locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support,
Secretary of State Jesse White and Assistant General Counsel Terrance Mc
Conville will attest to the veracity of this assertion;
A.
Plaintiff Lost
his job with Sheriff Department in the Administrative capacity because of the
Bogus Paternity case;
B.
Despite scoring
in the top 5-10% on the Police Exam a Commander with the Police Department
could not bring him on the Police department because of some integrity issues
that had to be resolved with the Bogus Paternity case;
C.
Plaintiff lost
his job driving a School bus (Reliable who later went out of business) because
someone was forcing them to accept bogus court orders for wage garnishees where
Plaintiff was forced to get on Welfare because of all of the money extorted
from his salary;
D.
Plaintiff was
rear ended by drunk Police Officer standing still driving a CTA bus Officer
totaled his van, Plaintiff sustained a back injury while off work injured on
duty allegedly City hall officials and CTA personnel stole his wages and tried
to destroy said personnel records saying Plaintiff was never a CTA employee.
E.
Despite filing
a grievance the Union never acted on the matter even up to this date, but the
union Javier Perez called the Plaintiff in 2015 telling him they never received
a letter from his physician stating he was fit to return to return to work, if
he had that letter we could do something about getting you reinstated, what he
did not realize Plaintiff had the information faxed it to him never heard from
him again;
F.
Plaintiff got
accepted to Northwestern Law School scored very high on LSAT could not attend
school because of the plethora of Racist Diabolical Obstructions no white man
have to endure living in Chicago, Illinois
G.
They have retaliated on Plaintiff’s children along with a plethora
of other “Fraudulent Acts, that Vol. 1 Gr Ex
H Plaintiffs son wrote a College Essay (Hardest Challenge) detailing the
mental effects these legal matters had on him and the family as we are
Homeless, as white men and some men of color sat by and allowed some coaches
and Public School administrators incite Terrorist Acts at son keeping him off
the field so college scouts would not see his talents earning a scholarship
going to a University of his choosing because his father stood up to Racism,
Niggercism and Terrorism;
H-That Plaintiff is on Welfare and
Homeless formerly with a Section 8 voucher because members of the Political
Democratic Machine have deployed every method feasible to keep him and any
other persons like himself oppressed enforcing Jim Crow laws;
I-
That
Pars 2, 3, 4 (a)
(b) (c) (d) most important
(e) of Vol. III “That Ex 1 of the aforementioned affidavit
emails and hand written notes establishing the fact if Plaintiff was making
over $100,000.00 he could live in their complex with his section 8 voucher at
345 East Ohio, due to his skin color”
J- That Pars
(F) (G) unequivocally articulates corruption in the HUD Section 8 voucher et
al. (H) “That CHA is still today violating a Federal Court Order et al. Order
entered program, that Mayor Rahm Emmanuel blasted the CHA voucher program Mar. 15,
2016;
K- That Pars 5 and 6 et al. demonstrates how said judge retaliated on minor son in a
cowardly fashion trying to keep him from graduating from High School and
innocent City employee brother was murdered in a Terrorist Manner;
Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS
5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings,
Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made
In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot
be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris,
App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
12.)
Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal,
conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently
violative of the judicial canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v.
Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
13.)
That the aforementioned Court Order is fabricated
entirely said Judge committed “Fraud”
on the Court;
A- Said Judge’s
legal entries for dismissing said complaint have been Unconstitutionally
recorded and frivolously applied and questions the judges motives as a Federal
Judge for his criminal actions in this matter; the judge erred in abusing the adversarial
process, a fundamental aspect of the adversarial system is that proceedings are
to be conducted in open court. Judges have been disciplined for disposing of
cases without an adversarial proceeding, In
re Fitzgerald, Unreported Determination (Ky. Comm’n 1986); Holder, 74 N.J. 581,
379 A. 2d 220 (1977);
That the Judge erred
considerably when it received notice and knowledge of other Judges complicit in
a Criminal Conspiracy failed to follow Canon Ethics Leslie W. Abramson,
25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by
Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence.
14.)
Said Judge concocted unlawful Unequal Protection of
the Laws violations in Dismissing Plaintiff’s valid certified legal complaint: The judge erred by engaging in a conspiracy citing a
case in the law that is of no merit in this matter and constitutes a failure to
follow the Canon laws, Matter of Markey,
696 N.E. 2d 523 (Mass.1998), Mississippi Comm’n on Judicial Performance v.
Byers, 757 So. 2d 961 (Miss. 2000)
Judge Darrah stated, “Plaintiff’s Complaint has failed to state a
claim under Rule (12)(b)(6) and is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Consequently, Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Application [4]
is denied. “[T]he court should grant leave to amend after dismissal of the
first complaint ‘unless it is certain from the face of the complaint that any
amendment would be futile or otherwise unwarranted.” Plaintiff is given leave
to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the entry of this Order. If
Plaintiff fails to do so, the case will be dismissed.”
15.)
Said Complaint was captioned Complaint of Civil Rights Violations (with over 500 pages
of Admissions, Exhibits and Facts)
Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations
Jim Crow
Violations
Judicial Corruption/Public Corruption
Conspiracy
Public
Officials/Fraud/Conspiracy
Civil Rights Act of 1866- first
section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United
States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are
hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every
race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall
have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and
Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be
parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey
real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and
proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white
citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to
none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the
contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42
U.S.C.A. 1981 (a)
16.)
That Plaintiff never received Equal Applications of
the Laws by the State Judges, State Agencies, City Agencies now this Federal
Court pursuant to the “Equal Benefit Clause” Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md.
1867)
the “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest
reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who
was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and
blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland
17.)
That Judge Darrah has acted outside of the provisions
of the immunity clause when he exercised the duties of his authority outside
the laws of the United States Constitution when he sided with the conspirators
DISMISSING Plaintiff’s legal Complaint unlawfully, ignoring all sorts of
“fraud” and “Criminal Civil Rights Violations of all parties noted in said
Affidavits and Complaint most importantly noted is Criminal mail fraud of an
alleged judge or law clerk in Springfield pursuant to Section
1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V.
Saunders (CA 5 Fla) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually
carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the
action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983
Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505;
a. Said Judge violated all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of
Judicial Conduct Rule 62 Scott,
377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported
Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter
alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver
accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification
Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes
or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office
and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the
judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of
disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
18.)
That Judge Darrah attempted to save a group of Racist
Terrorists by violating the oath of his office doing whatever is necessary to
further undermine, oppress, psychologically torture the Counsel Pro Se
Plaintiff as far as his robe would allow him by dismissing any and all claims
he put before the courts, demonstrating the Racial Hatred Irishmen have against
men of color as in the Plaintiff’s case; Bozarth, 604 A. 2d 100 (N.J. 1992) See also
Public Admonishment of Drew (Cal. Comm’n on Judicial Performance, July 1996)
(judge admonished for numerous violations including denying a defendant his
right to appointed counsel on the grounds of the ability of others to pay for
legal representation and the possibility of future employment
Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002).
The District Court failed to follow and apply said laws in an applicable legal
manner;
19.)
CHICAGO — A federal judge (Zagel) refused Tuesday to lighten Rod
Blagojevich’s original 14-year prison sentence for corruption, rejecting pleas
for lenience by the now white-haired former Illinois governor who attended the
resentencing hearing by video from a Colorado prison a thousand miles away.
Blagojevich, 59, was eligible for resentencing after an appeals
court last year threw out several convictions related to his alleged attempt to
sell or trade an appointment to President Barack Obama’s old Senate seat.
Washington Post August 9, 2016
20.)
That said crimes
perpetrated in the aforementioned Complaint is far worse than what Blagojevich
did trying to sell President Obama’s Senate seat and Judge Zagel upheld the
integrity of the laws and did not yield to public or political pressure
sustained his sentence;
21.)
U. S Sup Court Digest
24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy
is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct.
819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public
over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime,
both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp,
1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
CANON 1
A Judge should uphold the INTEGRITY and
independence of the JUDICIARY.
The
integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without
fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with
the law, as well as the provisions of this code. Public confidence in the
impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to
this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public confidence
in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.
22.)
That because of the horrendous unprecedented acts of
“draconian” criminal acts of conspiracies, the members of the Terrorist cell
Democratic Political Machine have met the legal burden within the Preponderance
of the Evidence Pursuant the
Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the
Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has
had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act
grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March
23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of
legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.,
“Where these gangs of
Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy,
at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in
their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to
hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit
juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all
the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice,
skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among
the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of
the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is
credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app.
At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While
murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and
banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local
administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper
corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the
guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and
innocent.”)
794 S.W. 2d 692 (Mo.
App. 1990) “No system of justice can function at its best or maintain broad
public confidence if a litigant can be compelled to submit his case in a court
where the litigant sincerely believes the judge is incompetent or prejudicial……
{T}hat is the price to be paid for a judicial system that seeks to free a
litigant from a feeling of oppression”. State ex Rel. McNary v. Jones, 472 S.W.
2d. 637, 639-640 (Mo. App. 1971) Indeed, the
right to disqualify a judge is “one of the keystones of our legal
administration edifice“State ex Rel. Campbell v. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d 399-401(Mo. Mo.
FEDERAL
JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found
Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City
to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the
law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a
law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”
WHEREFORE
the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Vacating the August 8, 2016 Court Order;
2.
Due to the Noted Deliberate Errors an Order Reassigning this
matter to another Judge;
3.
For an Order effecting the United States Marshalls to Cause
Service to be had on all of the noted Defendants;
4.
For an Order on the Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause Instanter on the Chief Judge
of Cook County, States Attorney and Attorney General of Illinois for
Contempt/Remand for not investigating or initiating charges against the unnamed
subjects responsible for mailing out court orders absent a judges signature;
5.
For an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Informa
Pauperis Motion;
6.
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Respectfully
Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
PO Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill. 60649-0075
Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Phone: 312 927-4210
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence Civil Action #16-cv-7434
Hon: John W. Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
Of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants NOTICE OF
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST 8TH DUE TO DELIBERATE ERROR
BIAS/AND OR PREJUDICE
To the Honorable Judge of the United States District Court
for the Northern District:
Moving Party, Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully
represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with an affidavit the noted
reasons why Order should be Vacated Pursuant to Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure;
{Pursuant to the provisions of the United States Constitution}
Please be advised that on
September 1, 2016, Plaintiff has filed before this Honorable District
Court, Motion for Reconsideration et al;
and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Darrah
September 15, at 9:30 am in room 1203
Commander
& Chief
Attorney
General of United States
President
Barack Obama
Loretta
Lynch
The White House
U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chief Judge Timothy Evans
Judge
Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600 50
West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Judge Mary Lane Mikva
Clerk
of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite
50
West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan
Asst.
Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
100
West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
States
Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center,
Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State
Asst
Deputy Dir. Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville 60
East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CHA Mobility
CHA
Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir.
Tracey
Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.
4859
S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill 60604
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Recorder
of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel
Karen
Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash
118
N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
City of Chicago, Department of Buildings
Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch
120
West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago,
Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris, Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Sara Eber Fowler
Suite 2400
131 South Dearborn
Chicago, IL. 60603
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, IL. 60605
Cary
G. Schiff & Associates Gordon
& Rees LLP
Christopher
R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Lindsay
Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1720
1 North
Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
Lewis
Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Christian
Novay
Chicago, Ill. 60603
550
West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago,
IL. 60661
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy
Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren
420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz, Sales Consultant
Sarah
Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio
420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Chicago,
Ill. 60611
John-Paul Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Father
Michael Pfleger
Chicago, Ill. 60611
St.
Sabina
1210
West 78th Pl.
Courtesy Copies:
Chg.
Il 60620
US
Attorney
FBI
Dir. Michael J. Anderson
Zachary
T. Fardon
2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago,
Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604
Leo
High School Principal Philip Messina
Hon Judge Neil Cohen
7901
S. Sangamon
50 West Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago,
Il 60620
Chicago, Ill 60601
Mayor
Deputy
Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77
West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon
Mark Kirk
525 South
8th St.
607
East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Bruce
Rauner
Alderman
David Moore
100 West
Randolph
Alderman
Ed Burke
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Cook County President
Cook
County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas
J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517
Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Hon
Dick Durbin
Hon
Judge
525 South
8th St.
Frederick
Bates
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
50
West Washington
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I Joe Louis Lawrence
Plaintiff-Counsel Pro Se, certify that I have on this day filed said Motion for
Reconsideration et al. with the Clerk of
the United States District Court with all attachments;
Dated
September 1, 2016
Respectfully
Submitted
Joe Louis
Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago,
Illinois 60649-0075
Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Phone: 312 927-4210
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16-cv-7434
Hon: John W. Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
Of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
AFFIDAVIT
Now
comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Plaintiff in this cause files
herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said
motion the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
NOTARY
P.O. Box 490075-0075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
@joelouis7
312 927-4210
No comments:
Post a Comment