THIS POST GIVES THE ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE IN HOW GENOCIDE IS PERPETRATED ON PEOPLE OF COLOR AND INDEPENDENT WHITES WHO OPPOSES RACIAL INJUSTICE AND DISCRIMINATION ON ANY ETHNIC GROUP;
PRIOR TO THIS YEARS ELECTION AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN WERE APPOINTED TO THE BENCH ONLY BECAUSE MANY OF THEM WERE IN FACT EASY TO CONTROL AND OBEDIENT TO THE RACIST WHITE MEN DOCTRINES AND WOULD NOT OPEN THEIR MOUTHS BUT WOULD NOT HESITATE DESTROYING THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUP BY EITHER KILLING ONE ANOTHER OR INCARCERATING THEIR OWN SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE RACIST WHITE MEN IN THE MAJORITY;
PRIOR TO THIS YEARS ELECTION SO MANY IN POWER WERE LIVING IN THE CLOSET IN SO MANY AREAS SODOM & GOMORRAH ACCORDING TO SCRIPTURE IS UNDER RATED IN THAT MANY WHO HAVE THE AUTHORITY AND POWER TO MAKE THE CHANGES WON'T OUT OF FEAR IN HOW THEY ARE LIVING WOULD COME OUT IN THE "LIGHT"
THERE ARE POWERFUL POLITICIANS WHO HAVE MEMBERS IN THEIR FAMILIES WITH AFRICAN AMERICAN RELATIVES WHERE A SISTER IMPREGNATED BY A BLACK MAN OR DATING A AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMAN IN A LESBIAN RELATIONSHIP ETC.
NO SELF RESPECTING MAN OR WOMAN WOULD BECOME INTERTWINED IN THIS TYPE OF MAYHEM ONLY A MALE OR FEMALE THEIR IS A DIFFERENCE.
MANY MEN AND WOMEN IN RESPECTIVE POSITIONS HAVE EXERCISED THEIR POWER AND INFLUENCE TO HELP ME GET TO THIS VERY POSITION BUT MANY POWERFUL RACIST MEN OR WOMEN WHO HAPPENS TO BE ANTI HETEROSEXUAL WHICH IS HAPPENS TO BE WHO I AM HAVE USED THEIR INFERIOR STATUS OR RACIST DISPOSITION OR IDENTITIES SEXUALLY TO KEEP ME, LEE OTIS LOVE AND MANY OTHERS OPPRESSED USING THE LAWS AS A WEAPON LYNCHING LIKENED TO GENOCIDE AS PRISONS ARE THE NEW CONCENTRATION CAMPS,
JUDGE MIKVA KNEW WHEN SHE DENIED MY MOTION TO HAVE JUDGE VALDERRAMA RECUSED THIS WAS GOING TO BE MY RESPONSE SHE WAS THE FIRST JUDGE ON RECORD WHO WENT AGAINST THE RACIST WHITE MEN CONTROLLING THE DEMOCRATIC (ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE) BY NOT HAVING MY DRIVERS LICENSE SUSPENDED UNLAWFULLY ON A BOGUS CHILD SUPPORT CASE.
AS A CHESS MASTER AND LOVER OF MARTIAL ARTS MY PLEADINGS HAD TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN SUCH A WAY TO TRAP AND PIN ANY PERSON IN THE LAWS REGARDLESS TO WHO THE JUDGE WAS OR SLEEPING WITH IF YOU FOLLOW THIS READING NOTICE HOW THE ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES ADMITTED BEING IN DEFAULT OR "FIXING" THE CASE ENGAGING IN A CONSPIRACY;
BECAUSE AS MEN OTIS AND I STAND FOR PRINCIPLES IN LIFE MANY TAKE FOR GRANTED THEY HAVE DEPLOYED AN ARMY OF CORRUPT MALES AND FEMALES TRYING TO "LYNCH" US USING THE LAWS A WEAPONS SINCE THEY CAN NOT USE ROPES OR WATER HOSES!
YOUR PRAYERS MY TWITTER FAMILY AND FRIENDS IS GREATLY NEEDED AND WELL APPRECIATED THANK YOU
O LORD MY GOD IS THERE ANY HELP FOR THE W'S SON?
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY
DIVISION
In Re Racial Discrimination/Source Income Violations
Housing Matters:
Joe Louis
Lawrence Case #
2015 CH 01670
Petitioner
HON. F. U. Valderrama
Room 2305
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human
Relations, K2 Apartments
Respondents
MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE (APRIL 1ST) ORDER DUE TO ERROR PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FAILURE TO COMPLY W/ SUBPOENA
IMPOSE SANCTIONS
w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence,
Attorney Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the
reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Motion for
Reconsideration Vacate Order (April 1st) Due to Error Impose Sanctions, pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871,
Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A.
Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting
Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct (as a Pro Se Counsel);
Respectfully Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
312 927-4210
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Twitter @joelouis7
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on
oath states:
1.)
That
the Hon Mary Lane Mikva erred in her ruling April 1st Hearing on the
Substitution of Judge Valderrama for Cause, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, March 10, 2016 Court
Transcript and Motion for Reconsideration et al. unequivocally demonstrating
Judge Valderrama committing PERJURY from the bench, Page 3, Line 24, “All right. The Subpoena is” Lines 1, 2 Page 4, “quashed. I find that
the subpoena is not relevant to the matter which is before the court”
2.) That the Principal
from Leo High School having been properly served by the Cook County Sheriff did
not deny or object to any of the assertions or the testimony by the Plaintiff
but Judge Valderrama Demonstrated Bias and or Prejudice Conduct and Favoritism
quashing the subpoena;
Pursuant
to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied, there
is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn
from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d
334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel
never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to
sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial
court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised
for the first time on appeal. People
ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
3.) That Judge Mikva
stated, Page 17, Lines 1-6, April 1st Court Transcript, “The only thing that can be SOJ for cause is
something that has nothing to do with the case before the judge that revealed---that
is causing a high degree—a high degree of favoritism or antagonism that would
make it impossible for the judge to make a fair judgment”
A- Antagonism is
hostility that results in active resistance, opposition, or contentiousness;
moreover, Judge Valderrama has acknowledged and admitted in that no attorney
has Denied or Objected to Par 1, Page 3
of the 2nd Amended Complaint, “That pursuant to Judge Valderrama’s series of
criminal errors trying to protect white men and uphold racist hate crimes lodged
at the Plaintiff, Friday November the 13th court order is void and
defective on all accounts”;
A-
That
Page 4, Par. F “That
because of the judges intimate involvement “FIXING”
this case he went outside of the judicial provisions of his immunity by recording false entries in Par 4, Administrative agencies are
without Contempt powers as an officer of the court Plaintiff had a duty and
legal obligation to Due-diligently
inform the court of corrupt unlawful practices exercised at the Human Rights
Commission;
B-
That Page 4, Par G, “The
Judge egregiously stated, Par 5, of
the court order “Plaintiff also alleges
that Defendants’ attorneys have committed
fraud on the court et al.
C-
That
on March 24, 2016 Judge Valderrama continued the matter for a non-party Defendant
did not Deny anything filed by them in opposition to the Plaintiff;
4.) That Judge Mikva
asked? Line 14 Page 13 “Any Cross Examination?” Lines 15, 16 Ms. Fowler No. Ms. Joa No.
5.) That Judge Mikva
asked again? Line 22, Page 15, “Okay any evidence from the” Lines
1 Page 16, “Defendants relative to the SOJ for cause”? Line 2 Mr Phillip “No”, Line 3, Ms. Fowler “No”.
6.) That Judge Mikva
stated, Lines 8-15, Page 16 “I have read your supplement to your motion. I have heard from you
today. What you’re really complaining, unhappy about, asserting is this
disagreement, which you’re entitled to disagree with judge Valderrama on some
of his legal rules. That is no way a basis for an SOJ for cause”.
A- FACT Judges error, hereto attached, March 11,
2016, Plaintiffs Motion Objecting Defendants Response et al. from the
affidavit Par. 3 Page 7, Lines 1-6 from transcript, “When I say service, I don’t mean
mailing anything….et al.” Pursuant to
735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq which is the Rule of Law;
B- FACT Judges error, hereto attached, March 17,
2016 Court transcript, Lines 22-24, Page 8, “You have indicated that from your perspective, this court has some
sort of bias or prejudice as to you, and therefore, I’m not going to rule.”
Line 1 Page 9, But he QUASHED said
Subpoena March 10, 2016;
C- FACT
error Line 19-21 Page 14 Joa “One more question no one from my firm has filed an APPEARANCE on
behalf of K2 Apartments”
D- FACT Judges error Lines 14-21 Page 15,
Judge Valderrama “You appear, you appear
generally. However, it’s in your circumstance you have appeared for the purpose of—you filed an appearance—well, you will file
an appearance moving to quash service. That’s my perspective. That’s what the
statute says. So I’m not telling you to go file anything or change anything
that you have filed. That’s what the statute says”
E-
FACT Judges error Lines 22-24, Page 15, Mr Novay “If the
court pleases, in that case then, we are in a different situation and we are in
the situation where we likewise never filed an” Lines 1, Page 9 “appearance nor have we had an intention”
F- FACT Pursuant to Par. 15 and 16 of the 2nd
Amended Complaint demonstrates favoritism according to the language employed by
judge Mikva in that Valderrama excepted summons served on the CHA via Certified
Mail case #2014 CH 10068 and the City of Chicago excepted summons served
Certified Mail #2015 CH 05085;
G- That Judge Franklin
U. Valderrama knowingly with malicious intentions committed Fraud /Erred demonstrated Bias and
or Prejudice Antagonistic conduct in said March 10th court order, in Denying/Quashing Subpoena
saying, “The subpoena served upon Leo High School is quashed as the
subject-matter of the subpoena is not related to the Complaint presently before
the court ;
A- Motions for Reconsideration are
designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was
unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in
court’s application of law. Continental
Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec.
314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
B-
The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert
the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their
correction. In re Marriage of King, App.
1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115,
rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
C- Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the
adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v.
Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291;
Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
D-
Fraud admissibility great
latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57.
where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great
latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts
allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL
334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud,
plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was
relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that
victim’s reliance led to his injury.
Parsons
V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d
354, Appeal Denied.
In
Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The
Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
H-
FOR THE RECORD: Plaintiff prepared said pleadings
specifically for the most racist corrupt judges that probably would be assigned
to this case from prior experience knowing they would close their eyes to their
brethren would do the same only because the FBI stated because Plaintiffs case
is a personal matter the FBI does not get involved in personal cases but
Plaintiff had to demonstrate how they could invoke jurisdiction otherwise, so
since many enjoyed playing board games; Plaintiff used Chess strategies pinning
attorneys and judges “Fixing” cases and naming them, the Feds don’t want 1 or 2
judges they want all of them.
In
that Secret Service Agents approached Plaintiff on another matter and mentioned
the Bogus Paternity case that affected his life everybody white is not a racist
and everybody that looks black don’t believe #BlackLivesMatter or anyone’s life
matter.
735
ILCS 5/2—1001(a)(3) (West 2006). Although the statute does not define
“cause”, Illinois courts have held that in such circumstances, actual prejudice
has been required to FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case, that is , either
prejudicial trial conduct or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n Transamerica Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d 247, 311 N.E. 2d
673 (1974; In re Marriage of Kozloff, 101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79 Ill. Dec 165 463
N.E. 2d 719 (1984); see also People v. Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171, 181, 28 Ill. Dec.
508, 390 N.E. 2d 867 (1979). Moreover, in construing the term “cause” for
purposes of a substitution once a substantial ruling has been made in a case,
I-
That Judge
Valderrama with vexatious “Contempt”
for the laws due to Bias and or Prejudice conduct became a law unto himself is further demonstrating as long
as he is wearing a robe nobody can tell him what to do or how to enforce the
laws, if racist judges can all get away with criminal acts fixing a paternity
case where the petitioner is concerned, it’s as if he is daring anyone to say
anything to him at how this case is being “FIXED”,
pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does
not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial
canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano
v. Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1037, 93 S.
Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v.
Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291;
Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an
agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537
U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement
to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a
distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime
ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy
poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the
relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more
likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from
their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe
inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest
of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time
of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending
culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242
N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense
need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all
its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108.
Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense
with intent that offense be
committed; Actus reas
element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in
pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in
violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may
impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an
appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or
parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of
the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not
only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false
statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify
an award of sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison,
No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992).
Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an
honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an
individual lawyer has engaged in sanctionable conduct, that lawyer’s firm can
also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
A- Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of
Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or
otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 Fla) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the
conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived
of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under
42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.
B- In that every attorney has properly admitted to every
assertion Plaintiff has properly presented in all Affidavits Complaints and
Motions but some judges are still operating and practicing under Jim Crow Nazi
tactics and is demonstrating to the Federal Bureau of Investigations and
challenging them to come and eradicate them because nothing is going to change
until they invoke jurisdiction and authority.
The Chicago Daily
Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page
1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press
writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois
is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the
most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are
the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265
5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner/Counsel Pro Se
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Petitioner respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.) For an Order REMANDING ALL parties
complicit in said ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY & Forcibly Removing Judge
Franklin Ulysses Valderrama from this matter Instanter;
2.) For an Order Vacating the April 1st , 2016 Court Order;
3.) For a Hearing date Order no complying with the Subpoena to
appear in Court April 1st;
4.) For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Under penalties as
provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that
the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to
matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters,
the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be
true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
Counsel Pro se
Certificate
of Service
Commander & Chief Attorney General of United States
President Barack
Obama
Loretta Lynch
The White House U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chief Judge Timothy Evans Judge Moshe
Jacobius
50 West
Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago,
Illinois 60601 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Mary Lane Mikva Clerk of
Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West
Washington, Suite 50 West
Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill
60601 Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan Asst. Atty. Gen
Tyler Roland
100 West
Randolph, Suite 1200 100
West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill.
60601 Chicago, Ill. 60601
States Attorney,
Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State
Asst Deputy Dir. Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville
60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West
Randolph, Suite 500
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill.
60601
CHA Mobility
CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive
Dir. Tracey Robinson/Joann
Harris
28 East Jackson
Blvd.
4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill
60604
Chicago, Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real Estate
Specialist Recorder of
Deeds
Jessie McDaniel
Karen Yarbrough
4859 S.
Wabash
118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill.
60615
Chicago, Ill. 60602
City of Chicago, Department of
Buildings Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch
120 West Madison Street
121 North
LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris,
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Sara Eber Fowler Suite 2400
131 South
Dearborn
Chicago, IL.
60603
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General
Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van
Buren
Chicago, IL.
60605
Cary G. Schiff &
Associates Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst
Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street,
Suite 800
Chicago, Ill
60602
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman &
Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
55 West Monroe,
Street, Suite 3800
Christian Novay
Chicago, Ill.
60603
550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago, Il. 60661
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy Martinez Manager 420 East
Ohio
60 East Van
Buren
420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz,
Sales Consultant Sarah
Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio
420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill.
60611
Chicago, Ill. 60611
John-Paul
Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio Father
Michael Pfleger
Chicago, Ill.
60611
St. Sabina
1210 West 78th Pl.
Courtesy Copies: Chg.
Il 60620
US Attorney FBI
Dir. Michael J. Anderson
Zachary T. Fardon 2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill 60604
Leo High School Principal Philip Messina
Hon Judge Neil Cohen 7901 S. Sangamon
50 West
Washington, Suite 2308 Chicago, Il 60620
Chicago, Ill
60601
Mayor
Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly E.
Bishop
City Hall
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Governor Hon Mark
Kirk
525 South 8th St. 607 East
Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703 Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Bruce Rauner
Alderman David Moore
100 West Randolph Alderman
Ed Burke
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cook County President Cook County Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark,
Room 517 Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill.
60602
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Hon Dick Durbin Hon Judge
525 South 8th St.
Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703 50 West Washington
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Please be advised that on April 13, 2016, Petitioner has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion for
Reconsideration et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument
before Judge Valderrama or any Judge in his stead April 22, at 9:15 am in room 2508.
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and
all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, emailed or via
facsimile or deposited in the U.S. mail to the above parties at the addresses
provided before 5:00 pm on April. 13, 2016.
________________________
Joe Louis
Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
No comments:
Post a Comment