JUDGES VIOLATING THE RICO ACT WITH NO REGARD TO PRESIDENT OBAMA OR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
BECAUSE THE MEN ARE IDENTIFIED AS DEMOCRATS BUT HAVE SUCCESSFULLY INFILTRATED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AS TERRORIST AND ARE INFLICTING THEIR RACIST DOCTRINES ON ALL CITIZENS OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.
The most confusing part of this is that Alderman Edward Burke is the author of this mayhem, he took a child from the mother African American (Tina Olison) and adopted her son but has deployed every Irish or Polish judge to destroy my life for standing up to him and his racist tyranny terrorist acts.
Why would a man like this want to adopt a child of color and in the same breath destroy a man of color with a family?
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe
Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court No. 15 CH 1670
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 15-1274
) Division No. 4
V. )
)
420 East
Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
345 East
Ohio, City of Chicago, Comm. )
On Human
Relations
)
Defendants- Appellees )
MOTON
FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE MAY 26, 2015 ORDER DUE TO “ERROR” “FRAUD” CORROBORATION
OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION & JUDICIAL VIOLATIONS OF THE RICO ACT w/AFFIDAVIT
REIMBURSE ALL FEES TO APPELLANT
Now comes Appellant Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel
Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and
files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Motion for Reconsideration
Vacate May 22, 2015 Order due to “Error” “Fraud” Corroboration of Public
Corruption & Judicial violations of the RICO Act with Affidavit reimburse
all fees to Appellant;
Respectfully Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
P.O. Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
312
927-4210
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Twitter @joelouis7
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on
oath states:
1.)
That
Judge James F. Smith erred in the application of the laws, and the attorneys
representing the Appellees committed “FRAUD” successfully Inducing
Reliance on the 4th Division acquiring a favorable ruling;
A- Motions for Reconsideration are
designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was
unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in
court’s application of law. Continental
Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec.
314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
B-
The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert
the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their
correction. In re Marriage of King, App.
1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115,
rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
C- Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the
adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v.
Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291;
Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
2.) That Presiding Judge Moche Jacobius of the
Circuit Court of Cook County signed a court order (Jan. 29, 2015) allowing
Appellant to sue or defend et al. pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 298 and 735
ILCS 5/5-105
3.) That because Judge Smith has acted outside of
the provisions of judicial immunity and in violation of the RICO ACT and has
committed “Fraud” and has demonstrated his role in the coup who have “Hijacked
the legal system enforcing laws upholding crimes in the criminal enterprise of
the City of Chicago and other entities named within this document.
A-
That because the Appellees Defaulted on $25 Million
Dollars and they were cognizant that no Negroid judges in Cook County were
going to rule against them due to the Terrorist Control had in the courts and
the lack of integrity so many have for themselves which is the only reason why
they are appointed to judicial positions and so they didn’t care or fear
reprisals for committing Fraud: ILL. App. (1st
Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court
lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the
inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order
was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d
846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.
4.) That Judge Smith is exercising criminal acts using
his robe to further uphold violations of the RICO ACT by making sure Appellant
not receive any justice due to skin color, hereto attached Ex B; Certified Printout.
A- That on March 30,
2015, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown certified a computer printout
Administrative Review along with copies of the Summons mailed out to each
Defendant pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq.
B- That the very
document that the Appellees and attorneys who are a part of this “Organized
Conspiracy” did not respond to the summons but was served because of their
diabolical connections in having judges who are a part of their “fraternal Coup”
said judges would deny and every
meritorious document Appellant were to present to them.
C- That the May 26,
2015 court order signed by Judge Smith which is consistent with his involvement
using his robe and authority assisting said Domestic Terrorists.
D- Pursuant
to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied, there
is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn
from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d
334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.
E- Pursuant
to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of
Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or
substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be
considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App.
1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
5.)
18 U.S. Code § 1962(c); elaborating that
"A Defendant May Be Liable for a RICO Conspiracy Offense Even if the
Defendant Did Not Participate In the Operation or Management of the
Enterprise"
6.)
That because of the Appellees arrogant contempt
for laws; especially receiving Notice of Federal Officials following this case
basically is doing what Rod Blagojevich did when he was cognizant the FBI had
him under under surveillance, he said, “come get me” now these untouchable
subjects have trapped themselves giving the Feds the middle finger thinking
Edward
7.) That pursuant to Carter V.
Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1983, The Supreme court has held
that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation
(sometimes referred to as “(fraud and deceit)”are: (1) False statement of
material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3)
intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in
reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party
resulting from such reliance., the attorneys for the Defendants satisfied this
requirement by committing PERJURY and engaging in a plethora of other
Terrorists Acts;
8.) FACT: The Chicago Council of Lawyers found Judge
James Fitzgerald Smith UNQUALIFIED to be an Appellate judge; furthermore,
hereto attached, detailed report basically reporting he was never fit to be a
judge!
9.) FACT: Judge Smith is cognizant at this point of his
violation of the RICO ACT that his signature DENYING this motion signifies his
disrespect and contempt for the laws and vexatious contempt for any Federal
Official upholding Equal Protection of the laws against those disenfranchised
by the present members who have “Hijacked” justice in the legal system;
10.)
Judge Smith
and any other judge have the right to hate be homosexuals change his or her
sexuality, this is America but when that hate or racist act infringes upon a
person’s civil liberties as demonstrated in this case, Civil Rights are
affected, Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of
Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or
otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the
conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived
of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights
under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.
11.)
That
Judge Smith was cognizant Appellant was indigent and homeless did everything
possible denying said motion “Fraudulently” so as to keep him from filing any
more credible documents of a meritorious nature; in that, Appellant had to pay
$50 in order to file the Motion of June 9th Motion for
Reconsideration et al.
12.)
That
#CHIRAQ is an appropriate name in which to describe this city; moreover, it is
a war zone operating as a modern day plantation and the concentration camps are
prisons housing persons of color where Negros in power will do anything to
destroy or criticize anyone seeking a life away from this racial oppression;
13.)
Appellant
has received information where liberal independent whites have been affected by
the same Terrorists as their homes are stolen, unlawful evictions in the same
manner Boule Negro Judge Leonard Murray ordered Sheriff to break into Appellants
home which was an abandoned building where Judge Scully as an attorney helped a
thug Craig Fulton falsify paperwork receiving section 8 money, in other cases
whites had their attorneys threatened etc. in eviction, housing or foreclosure matters;
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions.
People
V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of
conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that
offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of
agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in
violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may
impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an
appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties
the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the
pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only
will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements:
failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of
sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison,
No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992).
Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an
honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an
individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can
also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
14.)
In
Appellant’s cases never at any time did any attorney object or deny any of the
facts presented in all affidavits is why the likes of Judge Smith and everyone
else who is a part of the coup, that have “Hijacked” justice in Illinois Courts
would never grant Appellant or anyone like him justice or Equal Protection of
the Laws as long as he or they is wearing a robe;
15.)
That
like the Ku Klux Klan as they wore white sheets or robes as they “HUNG” men of
color for the hell of it inciting racist supremacy terrorism not too long ago
now terrorism has a new “organized terrorist” approach “lynching” is done using
men best described as “weapons of mass destruction” dispensating unjust laws
while wearing robes describing themselves as Machine Democrats instead of
Nazis, Skinheads or Klansmen.
16.)
That
the justice system have been successfully overthrown due to the coup successful
appointments of Boule Negros as they use them as pawns protecting all the
whites who happens to be racist in all government positions.
17.)
That
Governor Rauner has criticized the Supreme Court saying it is a part of a
“corrupt system”
18.)
That
to further amplify the veracity of the Governors statement and Appellants
affidavit Judge Smith have been deemed unqualified to be an Appellate Judge and
had no legal experiences, Judge Valderrama was appointed to the Rules Committee
effective Jan. 1, 2014, but he lacked a comprehensive understanding of Supreme
Court Rule 272 and service of summons where the Cook County Clerk can mail them
via certified mail; .
Fraud admissibility great
latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57.
where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great
latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts
allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL
334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud,
plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was
relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that
victim’s reliance led to his injury.
Parsons
V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d
354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335
ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a
cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as
“fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2)
known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the
other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of
the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional
Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d
1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129
et al.
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an
agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537
U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remands 371F.3d 1093
Agreement
to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a
distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime
ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy
poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the
relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more
likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from
their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe
inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest
of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time
of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending
culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242
N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines
help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for
corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the
most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are
the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FEDERAL JUDGE
GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of
police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00,
“No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
Rauner: ‘I don’t trust the Supreme Court’
Bruce
Rauner
Related Story
In
the March issue of Chicago
Lawyer magazine, Editor Pat Milhizer looked at Gov. Bruce
Rauner's proposed changes to the judicial system, including one to create
merit-based judicial selection as opposed to our current system of electing
judges. Read the story»
By Andrew
Maloney
Law Bulletin staff writer
Law Bulletin staff writer
A day after Gov. Bruce Rauner said the Illinois Supreme Court
is part of a “corrupt system,” a judges’ association fired back, calling his
comments “disturbing” and saying it “endangers the rule of law.”
The group’s response follows the Republican governor telling a
suburban newspaper: “I don’t trust the Supreme Court to be rational in their
decisions.”
Rauner said they’re “activist judges who want to be
legislators” and part of a “corrupt system” because they accept donations from
trial lawyers.
“You tell me if you look at who gives them the money, and you
decide whether there’s a conflict of interest going on in the courts,” Rauner
told the Daily Herald editorial board on Tuesday. “You tell me. Do you think
there’s not?”
If at this point any
judge reading this and still feels that he or she is above the law and continue
to desecrate his or her oath of their judicial position denying the Appellant’s
motion simply because of his skin color by all means deny this legal instrument
your signature will determine your fate.
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265
5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid
that he verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Appellant/Counsel Pro Se
APPEAL TO THE
ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST
DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe
Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court
No. 15 CH 1670
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 15-1274
) Division No.
4
V. )
)
420 East
Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
345 East
Ohio, City of Chicago, Comm. )
On Human
Relations
)
Defendants- Appellees )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Commander & Chief Attorney General of United States
President Barack
Obama Loretta
Lynch
The White House U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chief Judge Timothy Evans Judge Moshe Jacobius
50 West
Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago,
Illinois 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Mary Lane Mikva Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West
Washington, Suite 50 West
Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan Asst. Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West
Randolph, Suite 1200 100
West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Sec of State Asst
Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville
60 East Van Buren, 8th
floor
100 West
Randolph, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill.
60601
CHA Mobility
CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive
Dir Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson
Blvd. 4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd
Floor
Chicago, Ill
60604
Chicago, Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel
Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash 118
N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill.
60615
Chicago, Ill. 60602
States Attorney
Anita Alvarez
50 West Washington,
Suite 500
Chicago, Il
60601
Cary G. Schiff &
Associates Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago, Illinois 60606
Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris,
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Suite 2400
131 South
Dearborn
Chicago, IL.
60603
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the
General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van
Buren
Chicago, IL.
60605
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst
Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle
Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill
60602
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van
Buren
420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz,
Sales Consultant Sarah Aredia,
Leasing Consultant
345 East
Ohio
420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill.
60611
Chicago, Ill. 60611
John-Paul
Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill.
60611
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney FBI
Robert J. Holley
Zachary T.
Fardon 2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill
60604
Hon Judge Neil Cohen
50 West
Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago, Ill
60601
Mayor Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly E.
Bishop
City Hall
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill.
60601 Chicago, Ill.
60604
Governor
Hon Mark Kirk
525 South 8th St. 607 East
Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703 Springfield, Ill. 62701
Bruce Rauner
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cook County President Cook County
Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle
Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark,
Room 517 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill.
60602 Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago Housing Authority Seyfarth & Shaw
Office of the General Counsel Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Anne D.
Harris
Asst. Gen
Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph 131 South
Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
60 East Van
Buren
Chicago, Ill 60603
Chicago, Ill.
60605
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman &
Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
55 West Monroe,
Street, Suite 3800
Chicago, Ill.
60603
Hon Dick Durbin Hearing
Officer CHA
525 South 8th St. Frederick
Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703 60 East Van Buren,
Suite 900
Chicago, Ill. 60605
Father Pfleger Alderman David Moore 17th
ward
St. Sabina
Chicago, Il. 60620
1210 West 78th pl.
Chicago, Il. 60620
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and
all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, emailed or via
facsimile or deposited in the U.S. mail to the above parties at the addresses
provided before 5:00 pm on June 16, 2015.
________________________
Joe Louis
Lawrence
Plaintiff/Counsel
Pro Se
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE
COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe
Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court No. 15 CH 1670
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 15-1274
) Division No.
4
V. )
)
420 East
Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
345 East
Ohio, City of Chicago, Comm. )
On Human
Relations
)
Defendants- Appellees )
ORDER
This
matter having come on to be heard on Motion for Reconsideration Vacate May 26, 2015 Order due to
“Error” “Fraud” Corroboration of Public Corruption & Judicial violations of
the RICO Act with Affidavit reimburse all fees to Appellant , due notice having been given, the court having
jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter, and being fully advised
in the premises;
It is HEREBY
ORDERED that Motion for Reconsideration et al, Order is GRANTED INSTANTER.
ENTERED:
_________________________________
Judge Cynthia Y. Cobb
_________________________________
Judge David Ellis
________________________________
Judge Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr.
Joe
Louis Lawrence ________________________________
________________________________
Counsel
Pro Se
Judge James Fitzgerald Smith
P.O. Box
490075
Chicago,
Illinois 60649-0075
No comments:
Post a Comment