THE COLOR OF YOUR SKIN MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS COURT AND BECAUSE THE JUDGE MAY BE BLACK "NEGROE" HISPANIC DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERSON WILL HAVE SYMPATHY OR RULE WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE LAWS RIGHTEOUSLY
FOR EXAMPLE SINCE 1987, I ONLY HAD THE EXPERIENCE OF GOING BEFORE ONLY 1 JUDGE DEEMED AFRICAN AMERICAN BEEN BEFORE HIM FOR 2 YEARS CASE 85 D 068184, HE DISMISSED THE CASE ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1987.
AFTER ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE, FINANCE CHAIRMAN, POINTMAN WHO ASSIGNS JUDGES TO THE POSITION AS ASSOCIATE JUDGE UNDER CASE 88 D 079012 THEIR HAS BEEN 21 JUDGES IN THE COUNTY COMPLICIT MOSTLY IRISH AND POLISH BUT THERE WAS AN AFRICAN AMERICAN "NEGROE" ASSOCIATE JUDGE WHO WAS PERMANENTLY APPOINTED R. MORGAN HAMILTON WHO DID WHATEVER SHE WAS SUPPOSED TO DO.
IN 1992 THE CASE WAS BEFORE KAPLAN JORDAN A WELL RESPECTED JUDGE WHO TOLD ME DURING THIS TIME AS LONG AS I APPEARED BEFORE HIS COURT HE WOULD NEVER ISSUE A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE AGAINST ME AND REFERRED TO ME AS COUNSEL AND ADMIRED ME DEFENDING MYSELF BECAUSE SEVERAL OF MY ATTORNEYS HAD BEEN THREATEN OFF MY CASE.
KEEP IN MIND, I HAD NO IDEA WHAT A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE WAS AT THIS TIME I WAS OFF WORK WITH THE CTA DUE TO A WORK RELATED INJURY, THIS PARTICULAR DAY JUDGE KAPLAN WAS ABSENT, THE HIGHTOWER CASE APPEARED ON HIS CALL, MORGAN HAMILTON WAS THE SUPERVISING JUDGE, I HAD TO APPEAR BEFORE HER SHE WAS SOMEWHAT CURT, I THOUGHT SHE WAS BRIGHT ARTICULATE WITH AN ATTITUDE MANY WHITE ATTORNEYS HATED GOING BEFORE HER, I THOUGHT THEY WERE RACIST AND RESENTED HER BECAUSE OF HER SKIN COLOR AND SHE WAS A JUDGE. LITTLE DID I KNOW
WHEN I APPEARED BEFORE JUDGE MORGAN I WAS VERY POLITE AND PROFESSIONAL AS I EXPLAINED OR TRIED TO EXPLAIN THE MERITS OF MY CASE, SHE REPLIED "YEAH, I KNOW ALL ABOUT THIS MESS THEY BETTER BE GLAD THIS MESS WAS NOT ON MY CALENDAR" SHE EVEN HAD HER CLERK TO CALL JOSEPH V. RODDY'S LAW OFFICE NOBODY ANSWERED THE CALL SHE BECAME EVEN MORE ANGRY!
I ASKED THE JUDGE IF SHE WOULD DISMISS THIS MATTER BECAUSE I AM LOSING JOBS COMING BACK AND FORTH TO COURT THIS IS NOT MY CHILD? HER REPLY, THIS IS NOT MY CASE BUT I AM GOING TO NOTE IN THE COURT ORDER BUT I AM NOT SIGNING IT THAT "DEFENDANT IS NOT TO RETURN BACK TO COURT UNLESS PROPERLY NOTIFIED" KEEP IN MIND SHE WAS THE SUPERVISOR.
I WAS NEVER SERVED OR NOTIFIED IN AND AROUND SEPTEMBER 1994, ALDERMAN BURKE APPOINTED RONALD BARTKOWICZ TO THE BENCH AS ASSOCIATE JUDGE, HE WAS A FORMER CTA ATTORNEY IN WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION THE SAME AREA, I WAS IN WHERE CTA PERSONNEL REQUESTED, I FALSIFY HOW MY INJURY WAS SUSTAINED AND USE A MEDICAL CARD TO ABSORB THE COSTS OF MY MEDICAL EXPENSES.
BECAUSE I REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH CTA'S DIRECTIVE RONALD BARTKOWICZ ISSUE A BOGUS WARRANT AGAINST ME FOR ASSAULTING FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER A POLICE OFFICER, THE CRAZY PART I HAD NOT SEEN OR SPOKE TO FRANCOISE DURING THIS TIME
WHILE HANDCUFFED ILLEGALLY CTA HAD A INVESTIGATOR TO COME REMOVE MY BADGE FROM MY BODY TO CONCEAL THE FACT, I WAS AN EMPLOYEE AND TO PROTECT THE IRISH JUDGE RESPONSIBLE FOR AUTHORIZING MY WAGES TO GARNISHEED TO THE LAW FIRM OF JOSEPH V. RODDY IN C/O FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER
MORGAN HAMILTON WENT ALONG WITH BARTKOWICZ BUT THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF COMPLAINED OF THE ILLEGAL ACTS MADE HAMILTON MAD SHE RECORDED ON A COURT ORDER , I LEFT A CLOUD OF DISTRUST TELLING THE SHERIFF I WAS A CTA EMPLOYEE.
THE MORAL OF THIS JUST BECAUSE A JUDGE IS BLACK AFRICAN AMERICAN NEGROE WHATEVER THEY CALL THEMSELVES SOME THEM IN POWER ARE WORSE THAN WHITES AND WILL DO ANYTHING NECESSARY TO OPPRESS ANY MINORITY SEEKING JUSTICE OR RELIEF WHERE RACISM IS APPARENT.
THESE ARE THE TYPE OF BLACKS YOU READ ABOUT THAT IS DESTROYING PEOPLE THAT LOOK LIKE THEM ON THE SOUTH SIDE OR ANY SIDE WHERE HOMICIDES ARE HIGH IN THAT COMMUNITY DUE TO THEIR OWN SELF-HATRED.
SO IN POLITICS OR THE COURT SYSTEM POLICE ETC BLACKS WHO HATE THEMSELVES ARE THE ONES WHO WILL NOT STAND FOR NOTHING SELL OUT THEIR RACE SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THEIR OPPRESSORS AS DEMONSTRATED IN THIS CASE.
SO THAT THE RECORD IS CLEAR CHICAGO DO NOT NECESSARILY NEED MORE BLACK JUDGES BUT MORE JUDGES OF COLOR WITH SOME INTEGRITY.
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY
DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination ) Trial #2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations )
Housing Matters: ) Gen. #
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Petitioner ) Div. #
)
V
)
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority )
Hon. F. U. Valderrama
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission)
on Human
Relations )
Respondents )
________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF APPEAL
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that
Plaintiff-Appellant Appeals to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District,
from the Orders entered April 28, 2015, for not applying Equal Protection of
the Laws, Lack of Jurisdiction, Fraud, Conspiracy, Canon Violations, Conflict
of Interest other Civil Rights Violations etc.;
Plaintiff-Appellant will seek a reversal, or in the alternative,
reversal and remand with instructions for further proceedings, in that his
family has been Retaliated upon for Complaining of Housing Fraud re Section 8
and Housing Discrimination Circuit Court judge closed his eyes and became bias
and complicit in said conspiracy at the plethora of unchallenged affidavits
presented before him demonstrating all acts.
_________________________________
Joe Louis
Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
Name Joe
Louis Lawrence
Attorney for Pro Se
Address P.O. Box 490075
City, State Chicago, Illinois
60649-0075
Phone
(312) 927-4210
Email joelouislaw@yahoo.com
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY
DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination ) Trial #2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations )
Housing Matters:
) Gen.
#
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Petitioner ) Div. #
)
V )
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission)
On Human
Relations
)
Respondents )
________________________________________________________________________
Jurisdictional
Statement
Order entered: April 28, 2015
Notice of Appeal filed: April 30, 2015
Statutes: Circuit Court Judge
Committing Fraud, Circuit Court Judge aiding and abetting in a Criminal
Conspiracy, Circuit Court Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws
Violations, Circuit Court Judge engaging in “Treason Like Offenses”, Circuit
Court Judge acting outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, Circuit
Court Judge engaging in “Jim Crowis’m” Laws outlawed by the United States Supreme
Court as he used his robe and
jurisdiction to aid and assist attorneys engaging in Terrorists Acts of Racial
Oppression and housing discrimination where Public Officials tried to cover-up
Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws,
Retaliatory Racial Harassment, Civil Rights Violations, Racial Terrorism
Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, and other
Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.
Plaintiff is appealing to the Appellate Court , for a reversal
and remand with instructions based on the foregoing stated above:
The Appellate
Court has the Jurisdiction, to correct any error, Sanction or admonish
any person (s) who engages in an organized Chain Conspiracy and establish any
precedent in the law where deemed necessary, without fear of reprisals from any
political organization, terrorist fraternal orders, elected or otherwise, for
the mandate of their decision;
The Appellate
Court has the Jurisdiction and Wisdom to recognize when an individual
has not been afforded sapiency in accordance to the United States Constitution;
Plaintiff is before the Appellate Court because as a”Pro Se” litigant Judge Valderrama has maliciously with deliberate
depraved indifference for the laws stated in court order Judge Valderamma
stated “No. The clerk’s office doesn’t
serve anybody by certified mail. Let
me back up.” “When I say service, I
don’t mean mailing anything. When I say service I mean providing a copy of the
complaint and summons on the entity that you have named in your complaint, 420
East Ohio, the housing authority, 345 East Ohio, and it looks like the City of
Chicago and Commission on Human Relations”.
Plaintiff having filed a Motion for
Disqualification of judge due to Bias (Civil Rights Violations) et al. Prior, it was denied.
Plaintiff having filed the proper Motion for
Reconsideration Vacate March 30, 2015 Default Order along with the Summary
Judgment --
1.)
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-105 quote “service of summons, summons issued in
any action to review the final administrative decision of any administrative
agency shall be served by registered or certified mail on the administrative
agency and on each of the other defendants except in the case of a review of a final administrative decision of
the regional board of school trustees, regional superintendent of schools, or
state superintendent of education et al”.
Service on the
administrative agency shall be made by the clerk of the court by sending a copy
of the summons addressed to the agency at its main office in the state. The clerk of
the court shall also mail a copy of the summons to each of the other
defendants, addressed to the last known place of residence or principal place
of business of each defendant.
Judge Valderrama ignored the rules and legal
precedents entered in Plaintiff’s affidavit no attorney challenged or filed any
objections to said Motion or answered the complaints served upon them,
Plaintiff informed the court if he Denied this Motion he was going to file an
Appeal to the Appellate Court, his response “do what you want to want to do” in
an arrogant untouchable demeanor and Denied said Motion.
Fraud admissibility great
latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57.
where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great
latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts
allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL
334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
1.) Hereto attached, Group
Ex A, Order from City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations in violation of Supreme Court Rule 272 no
signature and corroborates CHA and 345 East Ohio engaging in an organized
Terrorist Conspiracy denying Plaintiff from residing in what is described as an
opportunity area using his Section 8 voucher;
2.) Hereto attached, Gr
Ex B, Crain’s business article, (July 28, 2014) “Poor families use supervouchers to rent in city’s priciest buildings
which validates the veracity of the aforementioned recorded in Gr Ex A in that whites are only allowed
to make $146,000.00 a year and live in the buildings with a voucher but people
of color qualified and indigent cannot;
3.) Hereto attached, Gr
Ex C, WBEZ91.5 (April 1, 2014) New Report reveals pervasive discrimination
in housing voucher program, which validates the veracity of why Plaintiff is
before this Appellate Court;.
4.) Hereto attached, Gr
Ex D, Schock calls for Investigation into Chicago Housing Authority
Supervoucher program, (July 28, 2014), which validates the veracity of all
complaints and pleadings ignored by the court and parties involved;
5.) Hereto attached, Gr
Ex E, checks tendered to Streeter Place in accordance to said policies but
never allowed to rent due to the aforementioned within;
6.) Hereto attached, Gr
Ex F, Request for Tenancy Approval Packet, from the CHA,, #4 Determining Rent CHA will call the owner
with a rent offer based on other comparable unassisted units leased within 1
year et al. This document demonstrates a “prima facie” showing that Gr Ex A further amplifies City
Officials in the City of Chicago, Human Relations and CHA engaging Terrorist
Acts making sure persons of color remain in segregated communities;
7.) Hereto attached, Gr G, Motion for Reconsideration et
al. with affidavit presented before Gr
Ex A, Page 3 naming 21 judges
some unbeknown to Plaintiff responsible for “Fixing” a paternity case
framing Plaintiff protecting a Police officer who had impregnated his minor
daughter and was arrested in 1977 or 1976 but was allowed back to the police
department and impregnated Francoise Hightower as an adult a Chicago Police
officer today.
8.) Hereto attached, Gr
Ex H, Affidavit from the Second Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et
al. presented before Judge Valderrama, Page
3 naming 13 Appellate judges who had notice and knowledge of the
plethora of Racist Terrorist Acts lodged at the Plaintiff ignored Canon 3D
(1);
9.) Hereto attached, Gr
Ex I-L Affidavits forwarded to US Attorney Zachary T Fardon in accordance
to the Department of Justice directive and has acquired the necessary
corroboration from all parties and entities pursuant to the FBI’s directive
demonstrating how they can invoke jurisdiction because they don’t get involved
in personal matters.
Said Judge
has allowed defendants to commit the aforementioned heinous criminal acts,
ignoring affidavits, the Laws of the United States Constitution and Plaintiffs
Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff is a nobody merely because
of his skin color, said Judge have corroborated and demonstrated his role in
this Organized Chain Conspiracy;
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful
combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et
al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the
conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable,
in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the
Government of the United States…..”
Plaintiff is before the Appellate Court
because when Justice was sought certain, Judges claimed they had no Jurisdiction
on cases where corruption and racism was apparent in that said individuals
share a particular “racial hatred”
towards ethnic individuals like the Plaintiff and will stoop to any level
necessary to achieve the goals sought as demonstrated in this case which is why
Plaintiff is before the Appellate Court.
I affirm the
above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
Commander & Chief Attorney General of United States
President Barack
Obama
Loretta Lynch
The White House U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chief Judge Timothy Evans Judge Moshe Jacobius
50 West
Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago,
Illinois 60601 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Mary Lane Mikva Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West
Washington, Suite 50 West
Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill
60601 Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan Asst. Atty. Gen
Tyler Roland
100 West
Randolph, Suite 1200 100
West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill.
60601 Chicago, Ill. 60601
States Attorney,
Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State Asst
Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville
60 East Van Buren, 8th
floor
100 West
Randolph, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill.
60601
CHA Mobility
CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive
Dir Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson
Blvd. 4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd
Floor
Chicago, Ill
60604
Chicago, Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel
Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash
118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill.
60615
Chicago, Ill. 60602
City of Chicago, Department of Buildings Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch
120 West Madison Street
121 North
LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Cary G. Schiff &
Associates Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Ruether, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst
Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle
Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill
60602
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman &
Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
55 West Monroe,
Street, Suite 3800
Chicago, Ill.
60603
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy Martinez Manager 420
East Ohio
60 East Van
Buren 420 East
Ohio
Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz,
Sales Consultant Sarah
Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East
Ohio 420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill.
60611
Chicago, Ill. 60611
John-Paul
Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill.
60611
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney FBI Robert J. Holley
Zachary T.
Fardon 2111 West Roosevelt
Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill 60604
Hon Judge Neil Cohen
50 West
Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago, Ill
60601
Mayor
Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly E.
Bishop
City Hall
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill.
60601 Chicago, Ill.
60604
Governor
Hon Mark Kirk
525 South 8th St. 607 East
Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703 Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Bruce Rauner
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cook County President Cook County
Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark,
Room 517 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill.
60602 Chicago, Ill. 60602
Hon Dick Durbin Hearing Officer CHA
525 South 8th St.
Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703 60 East Van Buren,
Suite 900
Chicago, Ill. 60605
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and
all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, emailed or via
facsimile or deposited in the U.S. mail to the above parties at the addresses
provided before 5:00 pm on April 30, 2015.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counse
Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
312 927-4210
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
