RACISM AND CORRUPTION CITY OFFICIAL (S) TRIED TO PROTECT BUILDINGS ENGAGING IN HOUSING DICRIMINATION WAS INEFFECTIVE BUILDING STILL DID'NT COMPLY IMPLICATING MANY CITY OFFICIALS.
RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before
a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during
“battle.” Section (a) of that rule states:
(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
(2) fail to disclose to a
tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to
be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing
counsel;
(4) Offer evidence that the
lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes
to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
(5) participate in the
creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know the evidence is false ;
(6) counsel or assist the
client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;
(7) engage in other illegal
conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;
(8) fail to disclose the
identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the
lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;
(9) intentionally degrade a
witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning
that person which are not relevant to the case;
(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not
reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence,
assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a
witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the
credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or
innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for
any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal
contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable
crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. Ill. Ill.
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits
misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official
capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as
required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by
law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or
another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38
33-3.
7.) The unnamed persons within the City
of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations acting in concert with the Terrorist
who is responsible for passing defective orders as legitimate should be recused
and removed from said positions instanter;
A-
Said
personnel have demonstrated contemptuous acts working in concert with Machine
Democrats in a fraternal manner making sure those individuals of the protected
class as in Complainant’s case not receive “Equal Protection of the Laws” for
standing up to “Racism” and Racial Terrorism exercised by City & State
Officials;
B-
Nearly
46 years ago Federal District Judge (Richard B. Austin) stated, “Existing
patterns of racial segregation must be reversed if there is to be a chance of
averting the desperately intensifying division of whites and Negroes in
Chicago” Dorothy Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority, Feb. 10, 1969, D.C.
296 F. Supp 907; Racism has not changed it is worse because black and brown
lives don’t matter only their votes electing a Democrat back into office to
further racially oppress them!
That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud
104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue
involved in a case, great latitude is
ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the
greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus
V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL.
App. 512.
8.)
That because the attorneys representing all of the buildings who have
actively participated in diabolical conspiracies upholding criminal Civil
Rights Violations and a plethora of “Frauds” is all the reasons why the Extension
should be Denied.
A-
U.S 2003.
Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.-U.S. v.
Jimenez Recio; 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154, L. Ed.2d 744, on remand 371
F.3d 1093;
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over
and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both
because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;
B- Section
1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v.
Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually
carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with
Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and
plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action maybe
treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis
v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W.
Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 th ed. 1992).
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E.
2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme
Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
If a pleading, motion,
or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or
upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a
represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order
to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred
because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a
reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of
sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to
the court can also justify an award of sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison,
No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992).
Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an
honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an
individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can
also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
The Chicago Daily
Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page
1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press
writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois
is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the
most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are
the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265
5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Complainant/Counsel Pro Se
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Complainant respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.) For an Order Signed by the Commissioner of Human Relations DENYING ANY
EXTENSION OF TIME.
2.) For the entry of an Order awarding to your Complainant for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Under penalties as
provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that
the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to
matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters,
the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be
true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Complainant
Counsel Pro se
Cary G. Schiff &
Associates
Yuleidy Joa Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson Lindsay Watson,
Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney FBI Robert J. Holley
Zachary T. Fardon 2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Governor
Bruce Rauner
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Mayor
Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall 77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601 Chicago, Ill.
60604
Cook County
President
Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517 Richard J. Daley
Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Hearing Officer CHA
Frederick Bates
60 East Van Buren, Suite 900
Chicago, Il 60605
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on January 21, 2015,
A Motion Objecting Extension of Time has been filed with the Commission on
Human Relations and said copy have been delivered or emailed to the applicable
parties;
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill. 60649-0075
312 927-4210
@joelouis7
No comments:
Post a Comment