CHA MOBILTY VOUCHER SYSTEM IS A SOPHISTICATED FRONT USED TO PLACE WHITE FAMILIES OR POLITICALLY CONNECTED PERSONS;
SEE WHY AND HOW CHICAGO MAINTAINS THE STATUS OF THE MOST RACIST SEGREGATED CITY IN THE UNITED STATES AND HOW FEDERAL HOUSING PROGRAM WAS MISUSED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS GOAL;
greatest liberality in the method
of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL
334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
2.)
Respondent is attempting to undermine this Honorable
Commission with a slew of misrepresentations of the facts in an attempt to
finagle themselves out of the admissions already made in their responses by CHA
via legal representative Assistant General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph,
pursuant to 13-H-73 and perjured testimony before Hearing Officer Frederick
Bates, Jan. 13, 2015;
3.)
Respondent and their lawyers have methodically lied and
committed “FRAUD” in every venue necessary undermining the integrity of
everyone involved engaging in racial wars conspiring with the necessary
personnel making sure Chicago remain segregated exhausting diabolical acts
necessary to achieve said goals;
4.) FACT: said complaint alleges
discrimination based upon source of income, CHA did not deny any of the
assertions presented in said complaint thereby admitting its veracity, AND
NEVER OBJECTING TO ANY OF THE LEGAL MOTIONS ACCOMPANIED BY AFFIDAVITS;
5.)
FACT:
Pursuant to 13-H-73, CHA admits to steering Complainant to 3804 S. Wolcott and
7936 S. Kedzie, Page 2, Par. 4,
south side areas;
6.) FACT: Pursuant to CHA they admitted not
attempting to negotiate rent, stated “Praire Shores, but the rent was above
HCV’s payment standards”, Par 3 Page 2;
7.)
FACT: Par 4, 5 of said complaint demonstrates CHA colluding with 345 East
Ohio in a discriminatory manner making sure complainant did not rent from that
location because he had a voucher and due to his ethnicity;
8.)
FACT: Par 7 unequivocally demonstrate via HCV Director Mariel Hernandez Rose
Peoples lied about said voucher being reduced and could not understand why she
made that admission;
9.)
FACT:
Pursuant to Respondent’s Ex Memo Review, Page 2 Haydia Housepian assigned by Chairman Michael Merchant
according to her to act as Complainant’s Mobility Counselor unlawfully with
Terrorist complicity informed K2 Management (unbeknown to Complainant upon
receiving this document from Respondent) G. Theordore “K2 would not be approved
under 150% EPS, by deliberately obstructing CHA Request for Tenancy Papers from
being signed and submitted to the proper reviewing body of the CHA who
negotiates the rent;
Complainant’s
Civil Rights in seeking housing in an integrated Opportunity Mobility area;
B- Since
being reinstated back into the voucher program nobody from the Mobility program
where Complainant lodged several complainants has ever prepared any documentation
establishing the fact, he was a participant of the Mobility program nor did
anyone sign any documentation communicating the advantages and benefits having
a Mobility participant in their units;
C- Respondents
were aware that numerous judges engaged in “Racist
Terrorist Conspiracies where Complainant was concerned falsified an entire case
88 D 079012 under the authority and leadership of former Police Officer
Alderman Edward Burke assigned all judges to enter corrupt unlawful orders on a
Paternity Case that was DISMISSED September 17, 1987,” but because
these were RACIST WHITE MEN IN THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, this was a norm
violating the Civil Rights of men of color;
D- Respondent
was aware as well as the Attorney General Lisa Madigan and States Attorney
Anita Alvarez what said judges did committing TREASON OFFENSES, but because
Complainant was termed a “Nigger
Nobody”
Anybody involved in this Conspiracy thought Everybody told
Somebody what to cover-up and destroy, to keep nobody of learning of
Everybody’s involvement, the problem was that, Everybody thought nobody knew
and told, Somebody not to worry because Nobody would never know how they lied,
falsified, conspired, and destroyed all documents to save Everybody, but
Somebody knew of what Everybody did and Nobody paid attention because to them
it was a “joke” Anybody became very nervous because now they realize Somebody
lied and now Everybody is in trouble with the LAW and will go to jail because
Everybody thought Somebody was telling the “TRUTH”!
E- Respondent
recruited the necessary personnel to engage in the aforementioned acts
anticipating no Judge within the City of Chicago would attempt to admonish them
because of the criminal acts they took part in continued to engage in Racial
Wars against the Complainant despite numerous faxes to Chairman Michael
Merchant complaining of Racial Discrimination his authority is limited to what
the Corrupt White Men instruct him to do did nothing;
you
have some intellect, the Wrath of Racism will be deployed against anyone as
demonstrated in this manner;
When
people ask how and why, Did all the judges enter orders against you and you
were never served? They did the same thing YOU did ignored Appellant and
assumed he was a Typical NIGGA, Passive NIGGA, Ignorant NIGGA, while the laws
clearly demonstrate my innocence they say NIGGA you GUILTY, I say I am a CTA
employee they say NIGGA you ain’t, I say I work for IBC/Wonder bread they say
NIGGA you DISCHARGED, I say I have a wife and 5 children they say NIGGA you
don’t have any dependent’s, I say I AM that That I AM somebody they say NIGGA
you don’t get it, you don’t exist, I say I am Educated I have spent 12-14 hours
a day in the Law Library studying the law and it’s applications, they laugh at
me and say NIGGA it ain’t what you know, it is who you know, I say I have
applied the laws better than some your best involved in this conspiracy, they
say NIGGA you right, because everyone involved is related to someone who is
related to someone no one is listening, I say I have proof they say NIGGA there
is no such thing as proof I say what do you mean? They say NIGGA we Lie we
Destroy we Cheat we Intimidate/Threaten we Undermine anyone necessary to
advance our Doctrines, I say my faith is in GOD, they Laugh NIGGA where was
your GOD all those years when we Economically Murdered you, NIGGA where was
your GOD all those years when we Assassinated your Character, NIGGA where was
your GOD all those years when we Buried your ASS left you for DEAD, NIGGA you
should be on CRACK/HEROIN, NIGGA you ain’t committed SUICIDE, NIGGA you
should’a ROBBED somebody, NIGGA you look GOOD how come you ain’t PIMPIN? NIGGA
with your MIND you can be the best DRUG DEALER, wait a minute NIGGA who are
you? How come nothing seems to have WORKED? First of All I am no NIGGA the GOD
I serve moves me by way of the SPIRIT, When I seek JUSTICE you reward me
INJUSTICE, when I seek HELP, you LAUGH at me, when my family and I suffer you
CELERBRATE.
Psalm 121 Verse 1, 2, I will lift up
mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. My help cometh from the
Lord, which made Heaven and earth.
That
because of the racist disposition various Democrats who are fraternally
connected to the political machine via Homosexuals, lesbians or Bisexuals who
share a combined interest in oppressing citizens of Chicago by any means
necessary have circumvented every area of racial equality and equal protection
to all citizens as demonstrated in this case by closing their eyes to the
plethora of Civil Rights and Terrorist Acts perpetrated in these matters
upholding Jim Crow laws to maintain their positions;
See that is why, the
Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the
Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has
had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act
grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March
23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of
legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.,
“Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe,
supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is
stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have
been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have
been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., ….
And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or
afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
FACT: Unnamed
participants within the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations
conspired and colluded with the CHA in preparing a “Fraudulent “ document Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent
that offense be
committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in
furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63 purported as the Commission’s order absent a
signature or certified seal or stamp.
A-
“Email from Jessica Mallon, (Feb. 13, 2014), this email
explains that Exception Payment Standards maybe up to 300% of HUD published
Fair Market Rents for the City of Chicago” Page
6, Par N;
B-
The report
indicates that the CHA would have paid a maximum of $3266 for the unit in
question, Page 6, Par P;
C- That
pursuant to 14-H-87, The Streeter
355 East Ohio exercised the same discriminatory practice noted above requested
Complainant come in with his checks and CHA moving papers noted in Ex G of 14-H-87 and 14-H-85;
Section
1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V.
Saunders (CA 5 Fla) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually
carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges,
or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may
be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V.
Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.
U. S Sup
Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy
is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819,
537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a
conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the
substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of
the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination
in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it
decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp,
1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
10.) FACT: That said document purported as
an order “VOID on all legal accounts, Adoption of E.L.,
248 Ill. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846,
315 Ill. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375….14Although
some trial judges may not review the orders of other judges,
areas, based on the location and
amenities of the unit. Three hundred percent of $1231 fair market rent for a
three bedroom unit results in a maximum rental amount of $3693. As such,
Complainant’s voucher could not have been used to rent a unit priced at $4,870
or $5,080 per month;
11.) FACT:
Crain’s Business article ref as Gr Ex B,
of 14-H-87 and 14-H-85, pursuant to Par 9 and 10 unequivocally demonstrate how
racist whites in the CHA and leasing managers engage in Terrorist activities making
sure complainant did not rent from their units due to his skin color; Turner 24 F.
Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in
what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The
plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her
former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an
apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the
same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being
transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted
a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in
fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of
the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
12.)
FACT: “The
Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights under Law spent two years
investigating discrimination in the subsidized housing market and found rampant
racial discrimination” Ref as Gr Ex C, furthermore; said report states, “the
study was conducted for the CHA.”
13.)
FACT: Hereto
attached, Gr Ex D, FINAL REPORT Chicago
Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, INC. FAIR HOUSING TESTING AND SURVEY PROJECT FOR THE CHICAGO HOUSING
AUTHORITY, contract #1048;
14.)
FACT: Hereto attached, Gr Ex E, woman alleges housing voucher discrimination in pricey
Chicago buildings, ( April 14, 2014), said woman filed 4 complaints with the
Chicago Commission on Human Relations, Complainant filed 8 two of them were the
CHA, Danielle McCain stated, “CHA has been criticized for putting families in
poor segregated neighborhoods in the city”
15.)
FACT: CHA
attorneys have committed MAIL FRAUD & PERJURED themselves before Hearing
Officer Frederick H. Bates June 11, 2014 and Jan. 13, 2015 trying to remove
Complainant from the voucher program for standing up to Racism and Corruption
in the CHA;
Discrimination
in CHA Voucher Program Violation of Hearing Officers Directive & Mobility
Voucher Fraud, (August 3, 2014) faxed;
B- Respondent
acknowledged receipt of the fax as reported in Memo Review Aug 4, 2014, “Received
a notice of official complaint from the participant Joseph Lawrence et al.”
C- Complainant
emailed the FBI and CC’d copies to various CHA personnel including Jessica
Mallon, hereto attached, Vol 2, Gr. Ex.
A, “CHA has Conspired with certain Leasing Managers keeping Qualified
Applicant from Moving into an Opportunity Area w/Supervoucher” (September
29, 2014)
D- Complainant
faxed the Chairman Michael Merchant not once but 5 times with numerous Racial
Discrimination Complaints attached as Vol
2, Confirmation of Faxes received, but because of Complainant’s skin color
Michael Merchant ignored every letter faxed to him (312) 913-7279;
E- Complainant
under cross examination informed Counsel for CHA Melonie Toney informed him
that there were no blacks living in the opportunity areas Complainant was
seeking to move in, Par 1 of Page 2, Vol.
2, Gr Ex A, states unequivocally,
“Jessie
and Chris Klepper said they had no knowledge of any African Americans being
accepted in those units et al” said documentation is consistent with
the documentation recorded within;
Respondent failed to tender to the Hearing Officer the
attached information so as to Induce
Reliance and perpetrate continuous Racial Acts of Fraud and Terrorist acts
on him simply because of the color of his skin; INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E.
2d 1236, 96 ILL
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme
Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other
party resulting from such reliance.
high
to me. So that you don’t risk losing your voucher, you should consider
something less expensive et al”
S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3, Official misconduct is a
criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct,
punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when in his capacity, he
intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by
law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to
perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another,
he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority…….
G- Complainant
was a part of the Mobility Program 2801 North Diversey who explained if a unit
was located the information was to be delivered to the Mobility counselors they
are the ones assigned to explain the program and submit the papers to the CHA,
this is what was done at 420 East Ohio 13-H-74,
never at any time did anyone at the CHA or Mobility ever speak on behalf of any
unit seeking to help him obtain the unit after Hearing Officer Frederick Bates
issued a directive that they provide units for the Complainant;
16.)
The CHA terminated that Mobility Program (2801 North
Diversey) comprised of African Americans but kept the program whom Complainant
described as a RACIST, Chris Klepper, Director simply because she would exhaust
the necessary obstructions and falsehoods required to keep qualified African
Americans out of the opportunity areas;
Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in
pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other
paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its
own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party,
or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the
other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of
the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable
attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for
active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can
also justify an award of sanctions.
17.)
Respondent’s
counsel Maria Sewell Joseph having been practicing laws for over 30 years and
knows better than to attempt these levels of “Fraud” and “Criminal Acts”
18.)
Hereto attached, Gr. Ex I Chicago Reader, Page 5, Par 6, according to Miguel del Valle his account dealing
with racial segregation, “We are not the city we were 40 years ago or 50 years
ago, when
the lack of mobility was due to race. Today the lack of Mobility is
due to economics”
No they are not burning down houses
or “Lynching Negroes from trees they are
a little sophisticated criminal acts are now done with paper hacking into
Credit reports judges are using their robes to assist criminals by falsifying
court orders”, hereto attached, Racist judge Timothy P. Murphy falsified a
court order on a case that was DISMISSED
September 17, 1987 had Complainant REMANDED into custody twice for
ALLEGEDLY OWING child support to a woman who was impregnated by her natural
biological father who was a policeman but because her mother was a white woman
they attempted the Emmitt Till approach;
A-
Judge David Haracz had the audacity to tell the
Complainant in open court “Biologically
the child may not be yours, but I am just the bill collector, we have to get
money from you some type of way”
B-
19.)
Racism has not changed in Chicago as a matter of fact
it’s administrators within the CHA and other agencies and certain corrupt
judges who have given a middle finger
to Judge Richard B. Austin’s Order, of Gr Ex I, who wrote February 10, 1969, “Existing patterns of racial segregation must be reversed if there
is to be a chance of averting the desperately intensifying division of whites
and Negroes in Chicago”
Page 3 demonstrates the veracity of the
aforementioned, In 1971, the Gautreaux case was still inching
along in Judge Austin's courtroom. In March, a month before the mayoral election,
the CHA complied with Austin's order to plan public housing in white
neighborhoods as well as black by listing 235 proposed sites in white
neighborhoods. But the sites needed city approval. Mayor Richard J. Daley
quickly called the proposal "detrimental" and said the units
"should not be built." His Republican opponent, Richard Friedman,
declined to guarantee to block the units if elected, noting instead that open
housing was "the law of the land." The Independent Voters of Illinois
called Daley "racist" because of his opposition to the sites. But
Daley knew "racist" was better in Chicago than
"integrationist."
20.)
That said Democrats in Chicago Hate Black and Brown
people and only tolerate them if they vote for them and is willing to
compromise their integrity oppressing ethnic groups of color or selected
foreigners;
One of the insidious traits of segregation is
how easy it makes it for the haves to ignore the plight of the have-nots. For
most whites, concentrated poverty and its many ills are an abstraction—something
they read about but rarely see, since it exists in parts of town they don't
live in or work in or visit. On the north lakefront, where the neighborhoods
are more diverse than most in Chicago, residents may also be fooled into
thinking it's the norm throughout the city.
21.) That Christian Novay formerly of Wilson
Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, Now with Gordon & Rees, LLP
had the audacity to state, "“it is
his modus operandi, to sue and file Complaints against those persons or
entities that do not succumb to Complainant’s
every whim” now this is a former Assistant District Attorney from
New York who is exuding in this response a man of color is supposed to accept
RACIAL INJUSTICE & OPPRESSION one
can infer from his transition from a larger law firm they did not accept or
approved of the racist terrorist tactics Christian brought to their law firm.
22.)
That said judges systematically denied every
legal document presented before the courts accompanied with affidavits
demonstrating Racist Corruption and Corroboration Admitting their roles in
Terrorist Conspiracies never denied or objected to any of the facts;
A-) That
every judge in the Appellate Court signed their names demonstrating who they
are and how they stepped outside of the judicial immunity provisions to violate
any and every law necessary committing “Treason” to assist their Brethren of
the Democratic Political Machine.
B-) That Complainant is
“Homeless” “Indigent” and family destroyed children psychologically traumatized
due to the aforementioned within a homosexual have a greater chance being
married in Chicago than a Brown or Black man have receiving justice in the
legal system!
Properly alleged facts within an
affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true,
despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel,
Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d
1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
23.) That
said judges engaged in Anarchy Racial Hate Crimes using there judicial
authority as “Weapons of Mass
Destruction” against the Government of the United States;
24.) That
no person of color is safe or protected by said Fraternal Terrorist of the
Democratic Machine because of the number of Judges and City and State Agencies
seized by them and is controlled;
REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
CANON 3D (1)
Under Section 3D (1), a judge who receives information that indicates “a
substantial likelihood that another judge “has
violated the Code of Judicial “should take appropriate action”. The
Canon does not require the judge to hold a hearing and make a definitive
decision that a violation has occurred before the reporting requirement is
triggered and at least one state’s judicial ethics committee has advised that
the reporting requirement is triggered when the judge has “sufficient
information” to conclude that a “substantial issue” has been raised that a
violation has occurred, Mass. Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op. 2002-04 (2002)
“Appropriate action” may include
direct communication with the judge who has committed the violation and
reporting the violation to the appropriate or other agency or body. See
Commentary to Canon 3D (1). “Appropriate authority” is the authority with
responsibility for initiation of disciplinary proceedings with respect to the
violation reported. Some jurisdictions’ rules specify to whom a judge must
report misconduct. For instance, Massachusetts Rule 3D (1) provides that if a
judge becomes aware of another judge’s unprofessional conduct he must report
his knowledge to the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court and the
court of which the judge in question is a member.
Note that the term “knowledge”, as defined
in the Terminology Section, denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question
and as such, a person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. In
drafting Section 3D (1), the Committee rejected the suggestion that the
criteria of raising substantial question as to honesty or trustworthiness be
applied in the context of reporting judicial misconduct as well, on the grounds
that those criteria are implicit in the present criterion of raising a
substantial question as to a judge’s fitness for office.
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
The President had additional
power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus
and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong.
Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion,
Section 4 provided;
“Whenever in any State or part
of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so
numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at
defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted
authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of
such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all
of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation
of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such
combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United
States….”
Complainant’s son is merely experiencing second generation racism and asked his father, “Daddy I thought people were supposed to judge you by your character not the color of your skin that is what Dr. Martin Luther King said”
The Chicago Daily
Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page
1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press
writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois
is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the
most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are
the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
Presently
74 countries have tuned in constantly reading Judicial Corruption in Chicago, Illinois reading the injustices
perpetrated at persons of color in America, unlawful1.blogspot.com
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”;
Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated
rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government
can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore
those very same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody
Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Joe Louis Lawrence
________________________
Counsel Pro Se
Under
penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5/1 -109, the undersigned
certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and
correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief
and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believe the same to be true.
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Complainant respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.) For an Order upholding the charges
Source income discrimination and race discrimination Instanter;
That
because of the heinous acts Plaintiff have been harmed by said Civil Rights
Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before any tribunal, and
the number of City personnel and plethora of other conspirators making sure he
did move where he desired and numerous Civil Rights Violations, Plaintiff is
seeking $7 Million Dollars as punitive
damages; Smith
v. Wade,
461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for
allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in
a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for
compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to
petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for
punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served
only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the
underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is
otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the
context of {1983}”
2.) For an Order invoking the Jurisdictions
of other legal entities to proscribe the necessary warrants and indictments
wherever applicable in this cause;
3.) That
because of the Directed evidence of emails and other documents and admissions
by CHA as they harassed and discriminated against Complainant engaging in
Terrorist Acts prohibiting him from accessing a unit in an area of his choosing
where he was qualified issue an injunction prohibiting CHA from housing any persons
with a voucher until this Commission orders an Auditor to ascertain the number
of voucher holders are in the unit and income criteria or until he is properly
housed in accordance to all legal standards of the laws;
4.) For
an Order disbarring any and all attorneys that violates RPC 3.3 and invoke any and all Sanctions for the same attorneys
that violates Supreme Court Rule 137;
5.) For
this Honorable Commission to assign this matter to a jurisdiction with Contempt
Powers.
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
P.O.
Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
@joelouis7
(312)
927-4210
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Commander & Chief Attorney General of United States
President Barack
Obama Eric Holder
The White House U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chicago Housing Authority Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman
& Dicker LLP
Office of the General Counsel Christian T. Novay
Asst Gen Counsel 55 West
Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Maria Sewell Joseph Chicago, Il 60603
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill 60605 Seyfarth & Shaw
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris
131 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
Chicago, Ill. 60603
TO AAG Tyler
Roland Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
General Law
Bureau Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
100 West
Randolph Street Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill.
60601 Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.
States Attorney, Anita Alvarez,
Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West
Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State Asst Deputy Dir
Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel
Terrence McConville 60 East Van
Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CHA Mobility CHA Mobility, HCP
Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir Tracey Robinson/Joann
Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd. 4859 S.
Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill 60604
Chicago, Ill.
60615
CHA Mobility, Real
Estate Specialist Recorder
of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel Karen
Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash 118 N. Clark,
Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615 Chicago, Ill.
60602
City of Chicago,
Department of Buildings Sabre Investments
Christopher
Lynch
120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900 Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cary G. Schiff &
Associates Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson Lindsay Watson,
Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney FBI Robert J. Holley
Zachary T. Fardon 2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Governor
Bruce Rauner
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Mayor
Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall 77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601 Chicago, Ill.
60604
Cook County
President
Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517 Richard J. Daley
Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Hearing Officer CHA
Frederick Bates
60 East Van Buren, Suite 900
Chicago, Il 60605
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on January 20, 2015,
A Response to Respondent’s reply has been filed with the Commission on Human
Relations and said copy have been delivered or emailed to the applicable
parties;
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill. 60649-0075
312 927-4210
@joelouis7
No comments:
Post a Comment