Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

CHA MOBILTY VOUCHER SYSTEM IS A SOPHISTICATED FRONT USED TO PLACE WHITE FAMILIES OR POLITICALLY CONNECTED PERSONS;

SEE WHY AND HOW CHICAGO MAINTAINS THE STATUS OF THE MOST RACIST SEGREGATED CITY IN THE UNITED STATES AND HOW FEDERAL HOUSING PROGRAM WAS MISUSED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS GOAL;

greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.


2.)    Respondent is attempting to undermine this Honorable Commission with a slew of misrepresentations of the facts in an attempt to finagle themselves out of the admissions already made in their responses by CHA via legal representative Assistant General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, pursuant to 13-H-73 and perjured testimony before Hearing Officer Frederick Bates, Jan. 13, 2015;

3.)    Respondent and their lawyers have methodically lied and committed “FRAUD” in every venue necessary undermining the integrity of everyone involved engaging in racial wars conspiring with the necessary personnel making sure Chicago remain segregated exhausting diabolical acts necessary to achieve said goals;
    
       
       4.) FACT: said complaint alleges discrimination based upon source of income, CHA did not deny any of the assertions presented in said complaint thereby admitting its veracity, AND NEVER OBJECTING TO ANY OF THE LEGAL MOTIONS ACCOMPANIED BY AFFIDAVITS;
  
5.)    FACT: Pursuant to 13-H-73, CHA admits to steering Complainant to 3804 S. Wolcott and 7936 S. Kedzie, Page 2, Par. 4, south side areas;

6.)    FACT: Pursuant to CHA they admitted not attempting to negotiate rent, stated “Praire Shores, but the rent was above HCV’s payment standards”, Par 3 Page 2;

7.)    FACT: Par 4, 5 of said complaint demonstrates CHA colluding with 345 East Ohio in a discriminatory manner making sure complainant did not rent from that location because he had a voucher and due to his ethnicity;

8.)    FACT: Par 7 unequivocally demonstrate via HCV Director Mariel Hernandez Rose Peoples lied about said voucher being reduced and could not understand why she made that admission;

9.)    FACT: Pursuant to Respondent’s Ex Memo Review, Page 2 Haydia Housepian assigned by Chairman Michael Merchant according to her to act as Complainant’s Mobility Counselor unlawfully with Terrorist complicity informed K2 Management (unbeknown to Complainant upon receiving this document from Respondent) G. Theordore “K2 would not be approved under 150% EPS, by deliberately obstructing CHA Request for Tenancy Papers from being signed and submitted to the proper reviewing body of the CHA who negotiates the rent;
When Complainant was a participant of the Mobility program 2858 South Diversey, hereto attached, A of Vol. 2 professional documentation from the Mobility Representatives certifying proper representation of the 

        Complainant’s Civil Rights in seeking housing in an integrated Opportunity Mobility area;

B-    Since being reinstated back into the voucher program nobody from the Mobility program where Complainant lodged several complainants has ever prepared any documentation establishing the fact, he was a participant of the Mobility program nor did anyone sign any documentation communicating the advantages and benefits having a Mobility participant in their units;

C-    Respondents were aware that numerous judges engaged in “Racist Terrorist Conspiracies where Complainant was concerned falsified an entire case 88 D 079012 under the authority and leadership of former Police Officer Alderman Edward Burke assigned all judges to enter corrupt unlawful orders on a Paternity Case that was DISMISSED September 17, 1987,” but because these were RACIST WHITE MEN IN THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, this was a norm violating the Civil Rights of men of color;

D-    Respondent was aware as well as the Attorney General Lisa Madigan and States Attorney Anita Alvarez what said judges did committing TREASON OFFENSES, but because Complainant was termed a “Nigger Nobody”

 Anybody involved in this Conspiracy thought Everybody told Somebody what to cover-up and destroy, to keep nobody of learning of Everybody’s involvement, the problem was that, Everybody thought nobody knew and told, Somebody not to worry because Nobody would never know how they lied, falsified, conspired, and destroyed all documents to save Everybody, but Somebody knew of what Everybody did and Nobody paid attention because to them it was a “joke” Anybody became very nervous because now they realize Somebody lied and now Everybody is in trouble with the LAW and will go to jail because Everybody thought Somebody was telling the “TRUTH”!

E-     Respondent recruited the necessary personnel to engage in the aforementioned acts anticipating no Judge within the City of Chicago would attempt to admonish them because of the criminal acts they took part in continued to engage in Racial Wars against the Complainant despite numerous faxes to Chairman Michael Merchant complaining of Racial Discrimination his authority is limited to what the Corrupt White Men instruct him to do did nothing;

    F-   Complainant was job security for all of the racist, inferior intellectually challenged attorneys that was deployed to take him on litigiously so as to demonstrate “White Supremacy” is how Chicago is governed and ran in the United States of America, under the Democratic Machine no man of color was to provide for his family only Welfare, no man of color was to have a job only Welfare, no man of color was to have an education if it looks as if 

        you have some intellect, the Wrath of Racism will be deployed against anyone as demonstrated in this manner;

When people ask how and why, Did all the judges enter orders against you and you were never served? They did the same thing YOU did ignored Appellant and assumed he was a Typical NIGGA, Passive NIGGA, Ignorant NIGGA, while the laws clearly demonstrate my innocence they say NIGGA you GUILTY, I say I am a CTA employee they say NIGGA you ain’t, I say I work for IBC/Wonder bread they say NIGGA you DISCHARGED, I say I have a wife and 5 children they say NIGGA you don’t have any dependent’s, I say I AM that That I AM somebody they say NIGGA you don’t get it, you don’t exist, I say I am Educated I have spent 12-14 hours a day in the Law Library studying the law and it’s applications, they laugh at me and say NIGGA it ain’t what you know, it is who you know, I say I have applied the laws better than some your best involved in this conspiracy, they say NIGGA you right, because everyone involved is related to someone who is related to someone no one is listening, I say I have proof they say NIGGA there is no such thing as proof I say what do you mean? They say NIGGA we Lie we Destroy we Cheat we Intimidate/Threaten we Undermine anyone necessary to advance our Doctrines, I say my faith is in GOD, they Laugh NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Economically Murdered you, NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Assassinated your Character, NIGGA where was your GOD all those years when we Buried your ASS left you for DEAD, NIGGA you should be on CRACK/HEROIN, NIGGA you ain’t committed SUICIDE, NIGGA you should’a ROBBED somebody, NIGGA you look GOOD how come you ain’t PIMPIN? NIGGA with your MIND you can be the best DRUG DEALER, wait a minute NIGGA who are you? How come nothing seems to have WORKED? First of All I am no NIGGA the GOD I serve moves me by way of the SPIRIT, When I seek JUSTICE you reward me INJUSTICE, when I seek HELP, you LAUGH at me, when my family and I suffer you CELERBRATE.

   Psalm 121 Verse 1, 2, I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. My help cometh from the Lord, which made Heaven and earth.    


That because of the racist disposition various Democrats who are fraternally connected to the political machine via Homosexuals, lesbians or Bisexuals who share a combined interest in oppressing citizens of Chicago by any means necessary have circumvented every area of racial equality and equal protection to all citizens as demonstrated in this case by closing their eyes to the plethora of Civil Rights and Terrorist Acts perpetrated in these matters upholding Jim Crow laws to maintain their positions;

See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983. 

       “Of all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.

Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,
           “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2,  app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)    

FACT: Unnamed participants within the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations conspired and colluded with the CHA in preparing a “Fraudulent “ document        Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63  purported as the Commission’s order absent a signature or certified seal or stamp.
A-    “Email from Jessica Mallon, (Feb. 13, 2014), this email explains that Exception Payment Standards maybe up to 300% of HUD published Fair Market Rents for the City of Chicago” Page 6, Par N;
B-     The report indicates that the CHA would have paid a maximum of $3266 for the unit in question, Page 6, Par P;

C-    That pursuant to 14-H-87, The Streeter 355 East Ohio exercised the same discriminatory practice noted above requested Complainant come in with his checks and CHA moving papers noted in Ex G of 14-H-87 and 14-H-85;

Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 Fla) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.  

U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

   Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
   Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
 
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.


10.)   FACT: That said document purported as an order “VOID on all legal accounts, Adoption of E.L.,
          248 Ill. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 Ill. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16,  375….14Although some trial judges may not review the orders of other judges, 
by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD; stated “The Chicago Housing Authority will pay up to 300% of the fair market rent for units in opportunity 

areas, based on the location and amenities of the unit. Three hundred percent of $1231 fair market rent for a three bedroom unit results in a maximum rental amount of $3693. As such, Complainant’s voucher could not have been used to rent a unit priced at $4,870 or $5,080 per month;

11.)   FACT: Crain’s Business article ref as Gr Ex B, of 14-H-87 and 14-H-85, pursuant to Par 9 and 10 unequivocally demonstrate how racist whites in the CHA and leasing managers engage in Terrorist activities making sure complainant did not rent from their units due to his skin color; Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.


12.)    FACT: “The Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights under Law spent two years investigating discrimination in the subsidized housing market and found rampant racial discrimination” Ref as Gr Ex C, furthermore; said report states, “the study was conducted for the CHA.”

13.)    FACT: Hereto attached, Gr Ex D, FINAL REPORT Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, INC. FAIR HOUSING TESTING AND SURVEY PROJECT FOR THE CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY, contract #1048;

14.)    FACT:  Hereto attached, Gr Ex E, woman alleges housing voucher discrimination in pricey Chicago buildings, ( April 14, 2014), said woman filed 4 complaints with the Chicago Commission on Human Relations, Complainant filed 8 two of them were the CHA, Danielle McCain stated, “CHA has been criticized for putting families in poor segregated neighborhoods in the city”

15.)    FACT: CHA attorneys have committed MAIL FRAUD & PERJURED themselves before Hearing Officer Frederick H. Bates June 11, 2014 and Jan. 13, 2015 trying to remove Complainant from the voucher program for standing up to Racism and Corruption in the CHA;
Jan. 13, 2015, Counsel for the CHA along with another person under oath provided false testimony stating Complainant did not provide said Request for Tenancy Approval Packet in a timely manner but failed to mention the discriminatory practices as stated within the aforementioned, hereto attached, Vol. 2 Gr. A, Notice of Official Complaint Re Racial 

       Discrimination in CHA Voucher Program Violation of Hearing Officers Directive & Mobility Voucher Fraud, (August 3, 2014) faxed;

B-    Respondent acknowledged receipt of the fax as reported in Memo Review Aug 4, 2014, “Received a notice of official complaint from the participant Joseph Lawrence et al.”

C-    Complainant emailed the FBI and CC’d copies to various CHA personnel including Jessica Mallon, hereto attached, Vol 2, Gr. Ex. A, “CHA has Conspired with certain Leasing Managers keeping Qualified Applicant from Moving into an Opportunity Area w/Supervoucher” (September 29, 2014)

D-    Complainant faxed the Chairman Michael Merchant not once but 5 times with numerous Racial Discrimination Complaints attached as Vol 2, Confirmation of Faxes received, but because of Complainant’s skin color Michael Merchant ignored every letter faxed to him (312) 913-7279;

E-     Complainant under cross examination informed Counsel for CHA Melonie Toney informed him that there were no blacks living in the opportunity areas Complainant was seeking to move in, Par 1 of Page 2, Vol. 2, Gr Ex A, states unequivocally, “Jessie and Chris Klepper said they had no knowledge of any African Americans being accepted in those units et al” said documentation is consistent with the documentation recorded within;

Respondent failed to tender to the Hearing Officer the attached information so as to Induce Reliance and perpetrate continuous Racial Acts of Fraud and Terrorist acts on him simply because of the color of his skin;                INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

Pursuant to Vol 2, Gr Ex A, July 11, 2014, Chris Klepper Director of the Mobility Program, stated, “Hello Joe. I believe the rent is too high for this unit and this development. Its over $4000 and I don’t know of any unit renting for that much in the CHA program at all. Of course we don’t know for sure what CHA will pay in this particular area of the city for a 3 bedroom but it’s over the maximum that I’m aware of and it seems very 

      high to me. So that you don’t risk losing your voucher, you should consider something less expensive et al”

S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3, Official misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when in his capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority…….


G-    Complainant was a part of the Mobility Program 2801 North Diversey who explained if a unit was located the information was to be delivered to the Mobility counselors they are the ones assigned to explain the program and submit the papers to the CHA, this is what was done at 420 East Ohio 13-H-74, never at any time did anyone at the CHA or Mobility ever speak on behalf of any unit seeking to help him obtain the unit after Hearing Officer Frederick Bates issued a directive that they provide units for the Complainant;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

16.)    The CHA terminated that Mobility Program (2801 North Diversey) comprised of African Americans but kept the program whom Complainant described as a RACIST, Chris Klepper, Director simply because she would exhaust the necessary obstructions and falsehoods required to keep qualified African Americans out of the opportunity areas;

       Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

            If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions.

BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanctionable conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer. 

17.)    Respondent’s counsel Maria Sewell Joseph having been practicing laws for over 30 years and knows better than to attempt these levels of “Fraud” and “Criminal Acts”

18.)    Hereto attached, Gr. Ex I Chicago Reader, Page 5, Par 6, according to Miguel del Valle his account dealing with racial segregation, “We are not the city we were 40 years ago or 50 years ago, when the lack of mobility was due to race. Today the lack of Mobility is due to economics”

No they are not burning down houses or “Lynching Negroes from trees they are a little sophisticated criminal acts are now done with paper hacking into Credit reports judges are using their robes to assist criminals by falsifying court orders”, hereto attached, Racist judge Timothy P. Murphy falsified a court order on a case that was DISMISSED September 17, 1987 had Complainant REMANDED into custody twice for ALLEGEDLY OWING child support to a woman who was impregnated by her natural biological father who was a policeman but because her mother was a white woman they attempted the Emmitt Till approach;
A-     Judge David Haracz had the audacity to tell the Complainant in open court “Biologically the child may not be yours, but I am just the bill collector, we have to get money from you some type of way”
B-      

19.)    Racism has not changed in Chicago as a matter of fact it’s administrators within the CHA and other agencies and certain corrupt judges who have given a middle finger to Judge Richard B. Austin’s Order, of Gr Ex I, who wrote February 10, 1969, “Existing patterns of racial segregation must be reversed if there is to be a chance of averting the desperately intensifying division of whites and Negroes in Chicago”

   Page 3 demonstrates the veracity of the aforementioned, In 1971, the Gautreaux case was still inching along in Judge Austin's courtroom. In March, a month before the mayoral election, the CHA complied with Austin's order to plan public housing in white neighborhoods as well as black by listing 235 proposed sites in white neighborhoods. But the sites needed city approval. Mayor Richard J. Daley quickly called the proposal "detrimental" and said the units "should not be built." His Republican opponent, Richard Friedman, declined to guarantee to block the units if elected, noting instead that open housing was "the law of the land." The Independent Voters of Illinois called Daley "racist" because of his opposition to the sites. But Daley knew "racist" was better in Chicago than "integrationist."


20.)    That said Democrats in Chicago Hate Black and Brown people and only tolerate them if they vote for them and is willing to compromise their integrity oppressing ethnic groups of color or selected foreigners; 

One of the insidious traits of segregation is how easy it makes it for the haves to ignore the plight of the have-nots. For most whites, concentrated poverty and its many ills are an abstraction—something they read about but rarely see, since it exists in parts of town they don't live in or work in or visit. On the north lakefront, where the neighborhoods are more diverse than most in Chicago, residents may also be fooled into thinking it's the norm throughout the city.
21.)     That Christian Novay formerly of  Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, Now with Gordon & Rees, LLP had the audacity to state, "“it is his modus operandi, to sue and file Complaints against those persons or entities that do not succumb to Complainant’s  every whim” now this is a former Assistant District Attorney from New York who is exuding in this response a man of color is supposed to accept RACIAL INJUSTICE  & OPPRESSION one can infer from his transition from a larger law firm they did not accept or approved of the racist terrorist tactics Christian brought to their law firm.

22.)      That said judges systematically denied every legal document presented before the courts accompanied with affidavits demonstrating Racist Corruption and Corroboration Admitting their roles in Terrorist Conspiracies never denied or objected to any of the facts;
     A-)     That every judge in the Appellate Court signed their names demonstrating who they are and how they stepped outside of the judicial immunity provisions to violate any and every law necessary committing “Treason” to assist their Brethren of the Democratic Political Machine.
    B-)      That Complainant is “Homeless” “Indigent” and family destroyed children psychologically traumatized due to the aforementioned within a homosexual have a greater chance being married in Chicago than a Brown or Black man have receiving justice in the legal system!  

  Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
    


23.)    That said judges engaged in Anarchy Racial Hate Crimes using there judicial authority as “Weapons of Mass Destruction” against the Government of the United States;      

24.)    That no person of color is safe or protected by said Fraternal Terrorist of the Democratic Machine because of the number of Judges and City and State Agencies seized by them and is controlled;
   
 


REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

CANON 3D (1)
    Under Section 3D (1), a judge who receives information that indicates “a substantial likelihood that another judge “has violated the Code of Judicial “should take appropriate action”. The Canon does not require the judge to hold a hearing and make a definitive decision that a violation has occurred before the reporting requirement is triggered and at least one state’s judicial ethics committee has advised that the reporting requirement is triggered when the judge has “sufficient information” to conclude that a “substantial issue” has been raised that a violation has occurred, Mass. Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op. 2002-04 (2002)

    “Appropriate action” may include direct communication with the judge who has committed the violation and reporting the violation to the appropriate or other agency or body. See Commentary to Canon 3D (1). “Appropriate authority” is the authority with responsibility for initiation of disciplinary proceedings with respect to the violation reported. Some jurisdictions’ rules specify to whom a judge must report misconduct. For instance, Massachusetts Rule 3D (1) provides that if a judge becomes aware of another judge’s unprofessional conduct he must report his knowledge to the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court and the court of which the judge in question is a member.

    Note that the term “knowledge”, as defined in the Terminology Section, denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question and as such, a person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. In drafting Section 3D (1), the Committee rejected the suggestion that the criteria of raising substantial question as to honesty or trustworthiness be applied in the context of reporting judicial misconduct as well, on the grounds that those criteria are implicit in the present criterion of raising a substantial question as to a judge’s fitness for office.

Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

“Whenever in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States….”

  
     Complainant’s son is merely experiencing second generation racism and asked his father, “Daddy I thought people were supposed to judge you by your character not the color of your skin that is what Dr. Martin Luther King said”

   The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.        

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   

Presently 74 countries have tuned in constantly reading Judicial Corruption in Chicago, Illinois reading the injustices perpetrated at persons of color in America, unlawful1.blogspot.com

Finally, this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Federal Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”           


                                       FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

                                                                                          Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                         ________________________
                                                                                         Counsel Pro Se

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5/1 -109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believe the same to be true.

                                                   


WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Complainant respectfully Prays for the Relief

1.)  For an Order upholding the charges Source income discrimination and race discrimination Instanter;

That because of the heinous acts Plaintiff have been harmed by said Civil Rights Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before any tribunal, and the number of City personnel and plethora of other conspirators making sure he did move where he desired and numerous Civil Rights Violations, Plaintiff is seeking  $7 Million Dollars as punitive damages; Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)  Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”          

2.)  For an  Order invoking the Jurisdictions of other legal entities to proscribe the necessary warrants and indictments wherever applicable in this cause;

3.)  That because of the Directed evidence of emails and other documents and admissions by CHA as they harassed and discriminated against Complainant engaging in Terrorist Acts prohibiting him from accessing a unit in an area of his choosing where he was qualified issue an injunction prohibiting CHA from housing any persons with a voucher until this Commission orders an Auditor to ascertain the number of voucher holders are in the unit and income criteria or until he is properly housed in accordance to all legal standards of the laws; 

4.)  For an Order disbarring any and all attorneys that violates RPC 3.3 and invoke any and all Sanctions for the same attorneys that violates Supreme Court Rule 137;

5.)  For this Honorable Commission to assign this matter to a jurisdiction with Contempt Powers.     

                                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                                    Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                                   P.O. Box 490075
                                                                                                Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
                                                                                                   joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                                                    @joelouis7

                                                                                                   (312) 927-4210

                                       CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States
President Barack Obama                                 Eric Holder
The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chicago Housing Authority             Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of the General Counsel                  Christian T. Novay
Asst Gen Counsel                                  55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800 
Maria Sewell Joseph                                 Chicago, Il 60603
60 East Van Buren                                  
Chicago, Ill 60605                                     Seyfarth & Shaw
                                                                 Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris       
                                                                   131 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
                                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60603

TO AAG Tyler Roland          Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
         General Law Bureau       Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
        100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300
        Chicago, Ill. 60601    Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.                                           
                                                         
       States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
       Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
           
Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601     

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor 
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615    
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel                                                   Karen Yarbrough    
4859 S. Wabash                                                    118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                Chicago, Ill. 60602

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch                                            120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                Chicago, Ill 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                   Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson                             Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606
Courtesy Copies:

 US Attorney                                            FBI   Robert J. Holley
 Zachary T. Fardon                                   2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor
Bruce Rauner
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

Hearing Officer CHA
Frederick Bates
60 East Van Buren, Suite 900
Chicago, Il 60605

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on January 20, 2015, A Response to Respondent’s reply has been filed with the Commission on Human Relations and said copy have been delivered or emailed to the applicable parties;

                                                             Respectfully Submitted


                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
                                                                           PO Box 490075
                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
                                                                          312 927-4210
                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                         @joelouis7                     

No comments:

Post a Comment