Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Friday, September 20, 2019


UPDATE! UPDATE! A TERRORIST WORKING IN THE FEDERAL BUILDING IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT MAILED A BOGUS COURT ORDER TO ME ON THE SEPTEMBER COURT ORDER PURPORTEDLY FROM A JUDGE SOMEONE WAS EITHER ILLITERATE STUPID OR BOTH BECAUSE THE ORDER CONVINCINGLY SHOW THAT A PERSON IS USING FEDERAL COURT STATIONERY TO PERPETRATE CRIMINAL ACTS.

THE WORSE PART IS THAT THIS SAME PERSON HAD ACCESS TO GINO J. AGNELLO'S COURT STAMP.

THEY MAILED AN ORDER FROM PURPORTEDLY FROM THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL WITH NO SIGNATURE OR SEALS DISMISSING THIS COMPLAINT SAYING IT WAS FRIVOLOUS!
BUT MADE IT CLEAR THAT $1000.00 DEPOSIT MUST BE GIVEN BEFORE ANY MORE DOCUMENTS ARE FILED BY ME.

IT SAYS "ANY COMPLAINT THAT COMPLAINANT TENDERS WITHOUT THE DEPOSIT WILL BE RETURNED UNFILED"

THE SECOND BLANK DOCUMENT NOT SIGNED BY ANY JUDGE OR CERTIFICATION SAYS ORDER IN RE COMPLAINT AGAINST DISTRICT JUDGES CHARLES R. NORGLE, SR. AND ROBERT M. DOW, JR.   STATES THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL HAS REVIEWED THE COMPLAINANT'S PETITION FOR REVIEW PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE RULES FOR JUDICIAL-CONDUCT AND JUDICIAL-DISABILITY PROCEEDINGS. THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DENIED".

THE CORRUPTION AND CRIMINAL JUDGES IN CHICAGO SEEMS TO BE TRYING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AS DOMESTIC TERRORIST TAKING SEIZE OF AN ENTIRE LEGAL SYSTEM THEY ARE NOT INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO APPREHEND ALL OF THEM DUE TO THEIR TERRORIST CONTROL.

WHAT #PRESIDENTTRUMP IS NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW IS THAT CHICAGO COOK COUNTY AND ILLINOIS COURTS ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE USED TO KEEP THE DEMOCRATS IN CONTROL AND JIM CROW LAWS ALIVE. 
 
CORRUPTION IN THE FEDERAL SEVENTH CIRCUIT & THE RAT IS CAUGHT!

THE DEMOCRATS IN THIS CITY HAVE BEEN THE AUTHORS OF CORRUPTION AND MAYHEM IN THE COURTS WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF SOME REPUBLICAN JUDGES.

BECAUSE SO MANY JUDGES DON'T READ THE LAWS OR THE DOCUMENTS PUT BEFORE THEM BECAUSE SO MANY OF THEM SIMPLY DON'T KNOW THE LAWS AND DON'T NEED TO KNOW THE LAWS IF THEY ARE DEALING WITH CERTAIN ETHNIC GROUPS.

FOR EXAMPLE TAKE THIS CASE A PERFECT EXAMPLE CORROBORATING THE ABOVE, A JUDICIAL COMPLAINT WAS FILED AGAINST CHARLES R. NORGLE, SR. AND ROBERT M. DOW, JR.

WHAT THE PERSON DID NOT KNOW IS THAT CHARLES NORGLE HAD SIGNED A COURT ORDER FOR THE FBI AND UNITED STATES ATTORNEY TO INVOKE JURISDICTION IMMEDIATELY AUGUST 20, 2019.

NOW FROM THAT VERY COURT ORDER NORGLE SIGNED IT ADMITTING HIS RULING IS PREDICATED ON RACISM, RACIAL HATRED BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF'S SKIN COLOR AND WAS IN RECEIPT OF CTA DOCUMENTATIONS VERIFYING ME AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY.

JUDGE NORGLE KNEW THE CTA ATTORNEYS ADMITTED TO RACIALLY DISCRIMINATING AGAINST ME ADMITTED FALSIFYING MY EMPLOYMENT RECORDS, ADMITTED LYING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES STATE OF ILLINOIS WHICH ENTITLED ME TO THE $33 MILLION DOLLAR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CTA AND LOCAL 241 FAILED TO APPEAR IN COURT ON JULY 26, 2019.

JUDGE NORGLE IS A PROUD WHITE NATIONALIST RACIST ONE THING IS TRUE DEALING WITH CERTAIN MEMBERS FROM HATE GROUPS WHETHER THEY ARE RACIST OR A TERRORIST THEY ARE GOING TO OWN UP TO THAT IDENTIFICATION, THE SAME WAY A GANG BANGER LETS YOU KNOW THE GANG HE OR SHE IS REPRESENTING.

JUDGE DOW IS CONDESCENDING IN HIS RACISM HE DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW HOW HE TRULY FEELS ABOUT PEOPLE OF COLOR BUT HIS ACTIONS TELL THE STORY, HE IS PROBABLY THE ONLY JUDGE FEDERAL THAT IS WITH A DOCTORS DEGREE FROM OXFORD UNIVERSITY.

HATE IS HATE, I DON'T GIVE A SHIT WHAT SCHOOL YOU ATTEND MY GRAND FATHER USE TO ALWAYS SAY "AN INDIVIDUAL IS IN HIS HEART WHAT HE THINKS HIMSELF TO BE AND OUT OF HIS HEART FLOWS THE ISSUES OF LIFE"

AS I DIGRESS JUDGE DOW RECEIVED MY TIMELY SUMMARY JUDGMENT APRIL 24, 2018 WHERE, I APPEARED BEFORE HIM MAY 2, 2018.

ON APRIL 24, 2018 A VETERAN CLERK WAS TRAINING A NEW CLERK AND WAS EXPLAINING TO HER THAT WHEN A PERSON COMES IN AND FILES ANYTHING YOU HAVE TO CHECK AND MAKE SURE THAT THE CASE IS NOT CLOSED BEFORE ACCEPTING ANYTHING HE HAD HER TO CHECK AND THE CASE WAS NOT CLOSED BECAUSE HE MADE A COMMENT, I CAN FINALLY MOVE FORWARD WITH MY LIFE.

THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS FOR ONLY $25 MILLION DOLLARS WHERE THE CHA 420 EAST OHIO, K2 APARTMENTS, CITY OF CHICAGO AND 345 EAST OHIO WERE COMPLICIT IN AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY NOT ALLOWING ME TO USE MY SECTION 8 VOUCHER TO MOVE IN THEIR UNITS BECAUSE OF MY SKIN COLOR BUT THE REALLY FUCKED UP PART IS THAT THEY TOOK MY MONEY AND DIDN'T RETURN IT!!!!

I HAD CREDIT SCORES OF 716 AND TWO CAUCASIAN REALTORS TO HAVE ACQUIRED THE UNITS WHICH THEY DID AN EXCELLENT JOB BUT WHEN THE BUILDING MANAGERS LEARNED OF MY SKIN COLOR THEY REFUSED TO LET ME MOVE INTO THE UNITS WHILE CHA WAS TELLING ME TO TRY MOVING WITH MY VOUCHER ON THE SOUTH SIDE AUBURN GRESHAM TRYING TO ILLEGALLY STEER ME.

CHA AND THE STATES ATTORNEY ACCESSED MY CREDIT REPORT WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE AND SOMEONE HACKED INTO MY CREDIT FILE AND DELETED EVERY ACCOUNT THAT WAS GREEN SHOWING MY STUDENT LOANS WERE PAID VEHICLE ETC. , MY CREDIT SCORE BECAME 560 AND 605 THE SHIT THESE RACIST WHITE NATIONALIST DID SURPASSES HUMAN IMAGINATION AND THE WORSE PART IS THAT BLACK NEGROE COLORED DEMOCRATIC INDIVIDUALS AS INFERIOR BEINGS CLOSED THEIR EYES TO THESE JIM CROW ACTS.

MY CREDIT SCORE IS NOW 747 IT IS AMAZING THE SHIT A RACIST PERSON OR A NIGGER WOULD DO TO DESTROY OR TRY TO ASSASSINATE YOUR CHARACTER LIVING IN CHICAGO.

EVERYBODY AND EVERY ATTORNEY ADMITTED THAT WHAT I RECORDED WAS IN FACT TRUE SO JUDGE DOW TOOK IT UPON HIMSELF TO COLLUDE IN A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TRYING TO SAVE OTHER RACIST WHITE NATIONALISTS BY ENGAGING IN MAIL FRAUD AND OTHER TERRORIST ACTS HAD HIS ALLEGED LAW CLERK TO PULL UP LAWS TRYING DISCREDIT THE ADMISSIONS OF ALL ATTORNEYS WHO DID NOT OBJECT OR DENY ANYTHING, I RECORDED IN MY PLEADINGS, STATED ON MAY 2, 2018 THAT HE DISMISSED MY CASE APRIL 3RD 2018.

I WAS THE ONLY BROWN COMPLEXIONED MAN IN A SUIT IN THAT COURTROOM AS I STOOD AT THE PODIUM WHEN THE JUDGE SAID HE HAD DISMISSED MY CASE APRIL 3RD YOU COULD HERE A RAT PISS ON COTTON ATTORNEYS IN THAT COURT ROOM LOOKED AT ME MOTIONED WITH THEIR FACES SHAKING THEIR HEADS SAYING NO!

I AM IN A WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON MODE HERE, SO RESEARCH THE LWS THE JUDGE USED AND LEARNED HIS DUMB ASS USED A CASE A-   Milchtein v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7th Cir 2018)”  THAT WAS NOT ENTERED INTO THE LAW BOOKS UNTIL APRIL 24, 2018, THE CHIEF JUDGE OF BANKRUPTCY SIGNED IT.

ONE OF TWO THINGS COULD HAVE HAPPENED IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT CAUSING THE RAT TO GET CAUGHT:

    1.)    THE DEMOCRATIC CHIEF JUDGE DIANE P. WOOD ALLEGEDLY PREPARED AND ORCHESTRATED THE COURT ORDER NOT PUTTING HER NAME ON IT OUT OF FEAR SOMEONE WOULD CATCH ON TO THE FACT HER SIGNATURE WAS NOT RECORDED.

                                            OR

   2.)    SOMEONE WITH DIRECT ACCESS TO THE CHIEF JUDGES EFFECTS ASSUMED THE AUTHORITY OF HER POSITION AND PREPARED THE BOGUS COURT ORDER AND HANDED IT TO THE CLERK WITHOUT HER SIGNATURE, GINO J. AGNELLO DIDN'T READ IT OR WAS A PART OF THE COLLUSION AND MAILED EVERYTHING TO ME.

HAD THEY KNEW OF JUDGE NORGLE SIGNING THAT COURT ORDER THIS POST WOULD NOT BE MADE AVAILABLE BUT IT IS NOT A NORM OR A PRACTICE FOR DEMOCRATS TO READ ANYTHING BECAUSE THEY FIX AND FALSIFY ANYTHING LEGAL OR DESTROY ANYTHING LEGAL SO AS TO PROTECT MEMBERS OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE. 



 


                                                           IN THE
                                          UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                 FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604




                                                                                         Charles R. Norgle Sr. Robert M. Dow, Jr.
  Complainant


    


                                                     
To the Honorable Justices of the Seventh Circuit and whatever other Circuit that Justices are presiding over this matter of the United States Court of Appeals:


    Complainant a United States Citizen, Born & Raised a Free Man Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and Court Order the noted reasons why this matter should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction so as to Vacate the court order reassign this matter to a judge with integrity, not affiliated with the Terrorist Democratic and some noted Republican Judges who have assumed the roles as “Private Citizens” “Trespassing upon the Laws” protecting the Alleged “White Nationalists”; {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and   with Affidavit.


   Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Appellant in this cause  files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144, to show that the “Private Citizen” Charles R. Norgle, Sr. has a personal bias with compelling evidence  against him where a proper sufficient Motion for Summary Judgment was filed stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction to grant said motion never objected to or denied by any of the Defendants; motions corroborating judicial corruption with court transcripts demonstrating “Fraud” “Trespassing upon the Laws” “Perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the court that the District Court ignored upholding Racism and Terrorism in the courts.

   That said judge has corroborated and demonstrated his role unequivocally as a “Trespasser of the Laws” when he HEARD testimony with affidavits DENIED said Motion, to Vacate August 8, 2019 Court Order due to Fraud et al. after the Defendants admitted to every PLEADING recorded.     

   Based thereon, Plaintiff-Complainant respectfully moves that the judge Robert R. Norgle, Sr. proceed no further herein and that this Honorable Seventh Circuit invoke jurisdiction; and transfer this matter outside of the Northern District Of Illinois and away from the Seventh Circuit due to members of the Democratic Political Machine seizing control over all courts and certain judges politically appointed because of their racist hatred of ethnic groups they deem inferior to them so as to  enforce the laws pursuant to the United States Constitution who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to hear this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.
  
Pursuant  to Rule 26  it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.  
A-   The Judicial Conduct and Disability Act Study Committee Section 352 directs the chief judge to dismiss the complaint or conclude the proceeding by “written order, stating his or her reasons” and provide the order to the complainant and subject judge in that no where the Chief judges signature is recorded validating the verity of said Complaint against District Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Robert M. Dow, Jr. being lawfully dismissed making the “Order Void a Nullity”

B-   That Pursuant to Par A warrants the jurisdiction of the FBI and U.S. Attorney to invoke authority per Judge Norgle’s court order of August 20, 2019 and apprehend all parties culpable in said  “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” Instanter.  

   Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.      

                                                                                                                                                                                               
   
                                                                 Respectfully Submitted,

                                                        By:   _________________          

                                                                                             Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                                 Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                               P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                                   312 965-6455
                                                                                   Joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                        @joelouis
                                                           IN THE
                             UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                 FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604


                                                  

                                                           AFFIDAVIT
                                                                                                                                                               
IN SUPPORT OF  RESPONSE AND PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR REMAND DUE TO FRAUD OF ALL CLERKS, JUDGES & PERSONS CULPABLE “FRAUD” “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE” PARTICIPATION IN AN “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” FAKE JUDGE(S) FRIVOLOUS DOCUMENT PURPORTED TO BE A COURT ORDER FROM CHIEF JUDGE DIANE P. WOOD AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST   (COURT ORDER DATED SEPT. 9, 2019)



{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}

   In 1986 the United States Supreme Court issued three decisions clarifying Rule 56. Though there was a dissent in every decision, there was also substantial agreement among all the opinions. Justices Powell, Marshall and O'Connor joined every majority. Only Justice Brennan dissented in every case, and even then, he agreed in large part with the majority's analysis of Rule 56, but judges in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals do not honor or abide by the laws of the United States Supreme Court; due, to their Terrorist Control over the entire legal tribunals of the State, City and Cook County and certain Federal Republican judges, in that, only those in majority of the Corrupt Democratic Political Machine and it’s noted conspirators are the benefactors in these tyranny offenses while the innocent and the just people of color are suffering at the helm of Terrorist controlling the legal tribunals.
“No one is above the Law”,  citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."         


         

I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Native/African American “Free Man” born a United States Citizen not a deportee, not a slave or illegal immigrant, not inferior to another man’s color of his or her skin, Heterosexual Man Born and Raised a Free MAN Counsel Pro Se, HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES DENIED IN ALL COURTS BUT NEVER TRIED being duly sworn on oath states:  


1.)     That Pursuant to the alleged document purportedly sent from Diane P. Wood Chief Judge of the Seventh Circuit Democrat and formerly considered for the position as Supreme Court Judge of the United States, Commentators have called Wood a leading candidate for nomination to the United States Supreme Court by President Barack Obama. She was a candidate to replace Justice David Souter when he left the bench in 2009, though that seat went to Sonia Sotomayor.

2.)      That Pursuant to the alleged document from alleged “White Nationalist” Diane P. Wood from the MEMORANDUM Par 2 states, “This complaint makes slanderous comments about the judges and asks that I enter orders for which I have no authority under the Judicial Conduct and Disabilities Act of 1980”

3.)        That said admission  corroborates and validates the verity of said judge using her robe and jurisdiction to aid and abet in an “Organized Conspiracy” obstructing justice engaging in a Criminal Terrorist Enterprise trying to save other alleged racist judges complicit in these diabolical criminal terrorist acts.

4.)      That Pursuant to Par IV is viewed as a THREATENING DIRECTIVE states  “Complainant has until October 1, 2019 to respond as to why he should not be required to post a $1000 bond with any future complaint which would be returned if the complaint was not frivolous.”

5.)      That said document titled ORDER September 9, 2019 Chief Judge Diane P. Wood states, IN RE COMPLAINT AGAINST DISTRICT JUDGES CHARLES R. NORGLE, SR. AND ROBERT M. DOW, JR.

    A-  For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, this complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 352(b)(1)(A)(iii).

6.)      FACT The Federal judge (Charles R. Norgle, Sr.) has corroborated and admitted his role in this Diabolical Hate Crime, and has signed a court order invoking the the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigations and United States Attorney Instanter, the Chicago Transit Authority and Amalgamated Transit Union 241 had a Summary Judgment served upon them and has admitted every assertion in all legal documents.

7.)      FACT  Federal judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. has corroborated and admitted his role in this Diabolical Hate Crime by trying to use a “fucking” court order after my Summary Judgment was filed trying to protect the members of the Democratic Political Machine.

8.)     FACT Special Agent Jeffrey Sallet may not be here to finish off indicting other corrupt public officials but incoming Special Agent Emmerson Bule, Jr. will be the new Boss in charge.
A-   These crimes that were once lodged at the Appellant are now levied at Big Brother the government if you sent this fraudulent frivolous document as a court order Diane  P. Wood it corroborates and demonstrates your position as a “Private Citizen” in other words,  a Fake Judge or clerk orchestrated this document which means you or they can be arrested indicted and convicted and sent to jail for probably the rest of their lives.

B-   The fact that Federal Clerk Gino J. Agnello signed his name on a document dated Sept. 13, 2019, which states “Enclosed please find an order and memorandum regarding the disposition of the Judicial Misconduct Complaint which was filed on August 29, 2019 against District Judges Charles R. Norgle, Sr. and Robert M. Dow, Jr.”  

C-   That Par II states “Pursuant to Rule 18(a) of the Rules for the Judicial-Conduct and Judicial – Disability Proceedings, you may petition the judicial council of this circuit to review the order. Et al.”

D-   That said clerk is aware and is allegedly implicitly involved in the transmission of what is now a mail fraud count amongst a plethora of other criminal counts in mailing out this Fraudulent document trying to pass as a court order dated Sept. 9, 2019 with no signature or seal of certification.

E-   That to further implicate Federal Clerks colluding in the Fraudulent acts of mailing out Federal Court Orders (Sept. 13, 2019) a clerk mailed to the Complainant from the Northern District of Illinois July 26, 2019 court order of Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is taken under advisement.  

F-   That said alleged Chief Judge or Racist ignorant person is trying to do what no attorney from the CTA or any area of law where the Appellant is concerned is that is to defend any of the assertions properly plead; thereby validating the verity of all pleadings being factual, In the case of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606.(7th Cir. 2013)  The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.  Where a Summary Judgment in both cases have already got both Defendants, Chicago Transit Authority and 420 East Ohio et al to admit to every assertion Plaintiff prepared but due to the ignorance of so many in the Political Machine.

G-  That because of the incompetent climate of so many in the Democratic Party, and even with Dow’s Doctorate in Philosophy could not avail himself from being caught up in this orchestrated “Terrorist Criminal Enterprise”    

9.)   That Judge Norgle became a law unto himself corroborating his role as a “White Nationalist” engaging in Racist Hate Crimes became a law unto himself ignored the United States Supreme Court and Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."

This statement of material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing summary 4 judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

10.)              That because Federal Judge Norgle has corroborated and admitted his role in this “Organized Conspiracy” by signing the Court Order (August 20, 2019)  Motion to Supplement Motion with Court Transcript of July 26, 2019 that Corroborates judge Norgle as an Alleged White Nationalist Engaging in Hate Crimes of an Active “Organized Conspiracy” w Affidavit whereby warranting the Jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigations/United States Attorney  negates any of his alleged Brethren to preside over this case in the Seventh Circuit due to Page 1 states “That judge Norgle’s ruling against the Plaintiff is predicated on Racism, Racial Hatred because of Plaintiff’s skin color”.

11.)               That because Federal Judge Norgle has corroborated and admitted his role in this “Organized Conspiracy” in fact “Nullifies” the August 19, 2019 court order making it “Void”.

12.)               That Judge Norgle realizes that he is caught in this Diabolical Heinous Hate Crime making it clear to his Brethren if he is going down everybody is going down with him said inferior Negroes and Colored people along with the alleged “White Nationalist” in the Democratic Political Machine are no longer conspiring with the Plaintiff now their crimes are against the government pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.

Section 4 the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…

Chicago Tribune Sept. 4, 2019,  His time in Chicago will likely always be remembered for the investigation that led to the charges against Burke — at the time one of the city’s most powerful figures who had managed to sidestep previous corruption investigations.

Since Burke was charged in early January, Sallet’s political corruption squad has carried out raids on the ward office of Ald. Carrie Austin and at the homes of several allies and supporters of House Speaker Michael Madigan, the Tribune has reported.
A sitting state senator, Thomas E. Cullerton, was charged in a ghost payrolling scheme last month.

Sallet declined to talk about any specific ongoing probes. But he said he leaves Chicago with the same feeling he had when he came here — that the city’s entrenched culture of public corruption will only truly end when the people say they’ve had enough.

“How can we end the cycle of corruption? When everybody stops tolerating it or when the people who are paying to play stop tolerating it,” Sallet said. “It takes courage from the people who are either the victims or the complacent victims. ... We need everybody in an all-hands-on-deck approach.” jmeisner@chicagotribune



B-    “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
      

     

                        FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT

                                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                          __________________
                                                                                            Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                           P. O. Box 490075
                                                                                              312 965-6455
                                                                                Joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                          @joelouis7
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief


1.    For an Order Vacating the Orders signed by judges Norgle and  Dow due to “Trespassing upon the Laws” and acts of “Treason”.

2.    For an Order reassigning this matter to another Circuit or District not influenced by corruption or politicians in Chicago.

3.    For an Order Granting both Summary Judgments Instanter.

4.    For an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Robert M. Dow, Jr. Franklin U. Valderrama, William Stewart Boyd, Diane P. Wood, Gino J. Agnello et al. into Custody Instanter.

5.    For an Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;

6.  For an Order setting Bond at $2-3 Million dollars for each person arrested for the diabolical Treason Offenses and other Terrorist Acts perpetrated in this matter.

7.    For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as judges and Clerks “Trespassing upon the Laws”

8.    For an Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.

9.    For an Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any judge in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.

10.    For an Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their oaths as judges.

11.  For an Order forwarding to Congress or the United States Supreme Court to authorize the Execution or Imposing Mandatory Life sentences upon every person that conspire, that engages in any acts of Treason, Trespassing upon the Laws against the United States government.
  
   12.  For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;





















































                                                             IN THE
                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                 FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604


 Joe Louis Lawrence                                              Judicial Misconduct Complaint #07-19-9004 and 90045

                                                                                         Charles R. Norgle Sr. Robert M. Dow, Jr.
  Complainant




                                   AFFIDAVIT

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                        
                                                                       



Joe Louis Lawrence                                        Notary

__________________
    





















                                                             IN THE
                             UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                 FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604


Joe Louis Lawrence                                              Judicial Misconduct Complaint #07-19-9004 and 90045

                                                                                         Charles R. Norgle Sr. Robert M. Dow, Jr.
  Complainant

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     NOTICE OF      

RESPONSE AND PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR REMAND DUE TO “FRAUD” “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE” PARTICIPATION IN AN “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” FAKE JUDGE FRIVOLOUS DOCUMENT PURPORTED TO BE A COURT ORDER FROM CHIEF JUDGE DIANE P. WOOD AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST   (COURT ORDER DATED SEPT. 9, 2019)
Please be advised that on, Sept. 19, 2019 Plaintiff has filed before this  Court of Appeals Response & Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al.   
General Counsel: Karen G. Seimetz         Local Union 241 Amalgamated Transit Union 
                                                                       President Keith Hill/ 1st Vice President
Chicago Transit Authority                                        1613 S. Michigan
Law Department 567                                               Chicago, IL 60613
567 West Lake Street                        
Chicago, IL 60661
   

                                  Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
                                           City Hall 7th floor
                                           Chicago, IL. 60601                                                                               
Circuit Court of Cook County, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington,
Chicago, IL 60601 Suite 1001

Courtesy Copies:
Cook County State’s Attorney                 Cook County Sheriff
Kim Foxx                                                     Thomas J. Dart
50 West Washington, Room 500            Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602                                                                                                                              
US Attorney                                     FBI Special Agent Emmerson Buie, Jr.  
John R. Lausch, Jr.                               2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                              Chicago, Ill. 60608
Chicago, Ill. 60604

        Judge                                                   Judge                       
Celia C. Gamrath                                      Neil Cohen                                
50 West Washington Room 2508    50 West Washington Room 2308        
     Judge                                                       Judge
Franklin U. Valderrama                            Moche Jacobius, Presiding Judge
50 West Washington Room 2402            50 West Washington Room 2403       

Judge                                                      Attorney General
Fredrick H. Bates                                   Kwame Raoul
Markham, IL. Room 102                         State of Illinois Building 13th Floor

Cook County President                        Chief Judge
Toni Preckwinkle                                Timothy C. Evans                                         
118 N. Clark, Room 517                    50 West Washington, Room 2600          
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        
                                   
Secretary of State
Asst Gen Counsel Terry Mc Conville 5th Floor
State of Illinois Building

               PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Sept. 29, 2019, A Response & Rule to Show Cause et al. has been filed with the  Court of Appeals and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;





                                                                                                     Respectfully, Submitted,  

                                                                          ______________________
                                                                                        Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                          Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                          Chicago, Ill 60649
                                                                                              312 965-6455
                                                                                        joelouis565@yahoo.com
                                                                                               @joelouis7

Tuesday, September 3, 2019


UPDATE! FEDERAL CLERKS AND ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALISTS JUDGES CHALLENGING THE FBI TO COME GET THEM SET AN UNSIGNED COURT ORDER DENYING THIS MOTION.

UNSIGNED COURT ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 STATES "UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE FILED ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2019, BY THE PRO SE APPELLANT MONZELLA JOHNSON,

IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE IS DENIED.

IT APPEARS THE DOMESTIC TERRORISTS WHO  HAS TAKEN SEIZED OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM WITH DEMOCRATS LEADING THE ASSAULT WITH SOME RENEGADE REPUBLICANS FOLLOWING THEM, WITH THE IMPRESSION THEY HAVE SUCCESSFULLY OUTSMARTED THE FBI AND OTHER RESPECTED LEGAL ENTITIES BY SUCCESSFULLY TRESPASSING UPON ALL LEGAL ENTITIES AT WILL DOING AS THEY PLEASE RUNNING ALL COURTS AS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

TERROR TERROR TERROR THIS IS HOW CORRUPT RACIST MEN IN POWER COMMIT GENOCIDE AND ETHNIC CLEANSING USING THEIR ROBES TO MASS DESTROY PEOPLE OF COLOR OR ANY ETHNIC GROUP THAT DON'T ABIDE BY THEIR DEMOCRATIC RACIST DOCTRINES.

CERTAIN WHITE NATIONALIST JUDGES HAVE INSURGENT FEDERAL CLERKS IN POSITION TO UNDERMINE THE INTEGRITY OF THE PUBLIC AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS BY ALLEGEDLY MAILING OUT UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS NEVER SIGNED SO AS TO PROTECT JUDGES WHO HAVE BECOME "PRIVATE CITIZENS" VIOLATING THEIR OATHS COMMITTING HEINOUS CRIMES ON THE BENCH SIMILAR TO THE COWARDLY MEN MASS SHOOTING UP SCHOOLS CHURCHES MALLS BECAUSE THEY DON'T LIKE OR APPROVE OF CERTAIN ETHNIC GROUPS BEING IN AMERICA.

WHAT ABOUT THE CITIZENS BORN AND RAISED AS AMERICAN CITIZENS BEING SUBJECTED TO DOMESTIC TERRORISM IF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES CAN BE INVESTIGATED HOW COME THESE SORRY AS PRIVATE CITIZENS SWORN AND APPOINTED AS JUDGES ARE NOT SUBJECT TO ANY INVESTIGATIONS OR INDICTED FOR THEIR INFAMOUS CRIMES?



                                                                   IN THE
                                         UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                               FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,            } Appeal from the United     
 As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust                     } States District Court for      
 2006-NC3, et al.                                                  } the Northern District of   
       Plaintiffs –Appellees                                      } Illinois, Eastern Division
                V                                                           }
No. 19-2040                                                          } No. 1:16-cv-08628
                                                                              }
 Monzella Y. Johnson                                           }
 Defendant-Appellant                                            }  Judge Gary Feinerman

                                                             NOTICE OF
MOTION  TO RECALL THE MANDATE  -  REVIEW  OF JUDGMENTS AFTER REHEARING AND APPEAL PERIODS EXPIRE DUETO CORROBORATION OF ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALISTS IN THE SEVENTH ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES & FRAUD AGAINST PERSONS OF COLOR AND RETIRED JUDGE RICHARD A. POSNER ON RECORD “THE BASIC THING IS THAT MOST JUDGES REGARD THESE PEOPLE AS KIND OF TRASH NOT WORTH THE TIME”                    


NOW COMES the Moving Party, Monzella Y. Johnson  (“Defendant”), hereby properly Noticing the Plaintiff’s with this Motion and all of its attachments to all parties Noticed in the Certificate of Service {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedures}:


                                                                                       Respectfully Submitted,

                                                                                    _________________________
                                                                                        Monzella Y. Johnson
                                                                                          5217 S. Ingleside                                                                                                               .                                                                                                 Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                                                      
                                          UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                 FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                   CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,            } Appeal from the United     
 As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust                     } States District Court for      
 2006-NC3, et al.                                                  } the Northern District of   
       Plaintiffs –Appellees,                                     } Illinois, Eastern Division
                V                                                           }
No. 19-2040                                                         } No. 1:16-cv-08628
                                                                             }
 Monzella Y. Johnson                                           }
 Defendant-Appellant.                                           }  Judge Gary Feinerman

JOEL M. FLAUM
DIANE S. SYKES
MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER

MOTION  
TO RECALL THE MANDATE  -  REVIEW  OF JUDGMENTS AFTER REHEARING AND APPEAL PERIODS EXPIRE DUE TO CORROBORATION OF ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALISTS IN THE SEVENTH ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES & FRAUD AGAINST PERSONS OF COLOR AND RETIRED JUDGE RICHARD A. POSNER ON RECORD “THE BASIC THING IS THAT MOST JUDGES REGARD THESE PEOPLE AS KIND OF TRASH NOT WORTH THE TIME”                    

NOW COMES the Appellant, Monzella Y. Johnson (“Defendant”), hereby respectfully Moves this court with corroboration, affidavits with court transcripts her Motion to Recall the Mandate due to Corroboration of Alleged White Nationalists in the Seventh Circuit engaging in Hate Crimes  “Fraud” & Misrepresentations to the court with all attachments {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedures}:
                                                                        Monzell Y.Johnson 

                                                                       _____________________

The United State Supreme Court Decisions

 “No one is above the Law”,  citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."         

1.)   FED. R. Civ. P. 60(b). This rule provides in pertinent part: On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud . . . , misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.

No statute, however, has been enacted to aid courts of appeals in balancing these interests when they are requested to recall their mandates, See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 244 (1944); Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 463 F.2d 263, 277-78 (D.C. Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 950 (1972); Hines v. Royal Indem. Co., 253 F.2d 111, 114 (6th Cir. 1958).


Id. All motions must be made within a reasonable time. Id. Motions based upon mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud must be made within one year of the entry of the judgment. Id. Moreover, this one year limit may not be varied in the trial court's discretion. FED. R. Civ. P. 6(b).  

2.)     That Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr. has signed a Court Order of August 20, 2019 GRANTING the Motion Corroborating him as an alleged White Nationalist Engaging in Hate Crimes of an Active “Organized Conspiracy” w /Affidavit whereby warranting the Jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation/United States Attorney Instanter;

3.)     That Judge Norgle has admitted pursuant to Page 1 Par 1 of the Motion to Supplement Motion with Transcript of July 26, 2019 et al states, “That said Transcript unequivocally corroborate without a scintilla of falsity that judge Norgle’s ruling against the Plaintiff is predicated on Racism, Racial Hatred because of Plaintiff’s skin color.  

A-    Clerk of the Seventh Circuit returned Motion to Vacate Court Orders Without signatures et al. (filed August 20, 2019) which caused this Motion to be filed.


5.)    That Pars 10 and 11 corroborate and demonstrate the methodologies employed by Alleged White Nationalist in the Seventh Circuit as they diabolically closed their eyes to mail fraud, perjury, Terrorist Acts as said insurgents committed “Treason
Offenses” denying Plaintiff’s Equal Protection of the Laws due to his skin color.

6.)    That because Defendant-Appellant never received any Court Orders from any judge in the Seventh Circuit warrants the mandate to be recalled and further investigated to ascertain what other Federal Personnel and judges have used their racial influence to act as “Private Citizens” by invoking Terrorist Mayhem on innocent persons of color by DENYING every legally valid document without any signatures of certification.

A-    When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
B-    Judges have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/ ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
Judicial immunity does not exist for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with, aiding and abetting, another judge's criminal activity.
C-   The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse."
When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
By law, a judge is a State Officer or Federal Officer.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).


7.)    That Judge Posner left the Seventh Circuit and became the Whistleblower on the horrific details of how racist Federal Judges dispensate the laws in accordance to one’s skin color.

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

A-    Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.

B-    “A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d  227-232 

C-    “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)   

D-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

E-     A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).


Wherefore Defendant-Appellant Prays that this Circuit Recall the Mandate Instanter and Transfer any and all other Matters to Federal Officials for Investigation of all Alleged White Nationalist judges in the Seventh and Northern District of Illinois Circuits.

1.)    Order the acceptance of Motion to Vacate Court Orders without signatures and to Certify Court Orders with signatures pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Invoke the Jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigations/United States Attorney Instanter (filed August 29, 2019).


The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   
                                  



                                                                               Respectfully submitted,

                                                                             _________________________
                                                                               Monzella Y. Johnson

                                                                                        Chicago, IL. 60615
                                                                 IN THE
                                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                             FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604




                                           CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I  Monzella Y. Johnson, certify that on September, 3, 2019 I have caused proper service to be had on all Plaintiff’s via personally delivery or US Mail.

Cook County State’s Attorney                               Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
         Kim Foxx                                                       50 West Washington, Suite 2600
         50 West Washington, Suite 500                             Chicago, Ill. 60601
         Chicago, Ill. 60601       

                                   Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
                                           City Hall 7th floor
                                           Chicago, IL. 60601                                                                               

Postestivo & Assoc.                          Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP
 223 West Jackson Blvd. Suite 610     151 N. Franklin Street, #2500
Chicago, Illinois 60606                         Chicago, Illinois 60606

                                   Lord & Locke
                                111 S. Wacker Dr. #4100
                                 Chicago, Il. 60606

Clerk of the Circuit Court                     
Dorothy Brown                                                                     Attorney General   
50 West Washington, Suite 1001                                              Kwame Raoul
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                                          100 West Randolph, Suite 1300
                                                                 Chicago, Ill. 60601
  
Chicago Tribune Contact Reporter
Megan Crepeau
160 N. Stetson,
Chicago, Il. 60601
Said case demonstrates within the parameter of the laws how the Illinois legal system is under siege, as stated in earlier affidavits, the Ku Klux Klan, pursuant to the act of 1871 Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) Remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”)


PLEASE BE ADVISED that on  September 3, 2019 a  Motion  to Recall of Mandate et al. has been filed in the United States Court of Appeals


                                                                               Respectfully submitted,

                                                                             _________________________
                                                                                Monzella Y. Johnson
                                                                                       5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
                                                                                        Chicago, IL. 60615
                                                                                        773 835-5849






   

                                                                    IN THE
                                          UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                              FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                               CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604


                                                             
                                                        AFFIDAVIT

I  Monzella Y. Johnson, files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:

I  Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states that, I have caused the aforementioned Notice and Motion for Reconsideration, to the noted Plaintiffs via hand delivery or U.S. Sept. 3, 2019, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary
                                                                       
____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
 Chicago, IL. 60615