Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Wednesday, October 14, 2026

 

                           HOW DO YOU DEFINE JUSTICE? WHAT IS JUSTICE?

THIS IS A TRUE EVENT, THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE FEDERAL COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT---HE ORDERED THE PLAINTIFF SUING VERIZON, INC ET AL 

JAN 2, 2026, WAS A CERTIFIED LEGAL FEDERAL HOLIDAY BUT THIS FEDERAL JUDGE ALLOWED VERIZON'S ATTORNEY TO FILE A LATE ANSWER AND IMMEDIATELY ENTERED AN ORDER MONDAY JAN 6, 2026.

THE JUDGE DISMISSED MY CASE BECAUSE HE SAID, I NEVER COMPLIED WITH HIS COURT ORDER IN SUBMITTING STATUS REPORTS WTF NOW THIS CASE IS IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT BUT EVERY MOTION FILED HAS BEEN SYSTEMATICALLY DENIED!

Tuesday, December 02, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has moved for default as to Defendants Equifax and Verizon, see27 , and for default judgment,26 . The Court denies both motions26 ,27 and strikes the 12/3/25 Notice of Motion date. Default remains inappropriate as to Defendant Equifax, which has appeared and answered, see15 ,17 ,18 . And default also remains inappropriate as to Verizon because Plaintiff's submissions do not demonstrate service in compliance with Rule 4. Plaintiff's proof of service indicates that he served Verizon via certified mail, see6 . But neither Rule 4(h), nor any other section of Rule 4, allows a plaintiff to serve a private domestic corporation by certified mail. Nor does Illinois law provide for service by certified mail. See 735 ILCS 5/2204. Instead, Rule 4(h) provides that, unless federal law provides otherwise or the defendant's waiver has been filed, "a domestic or foreign corporation, or a partnership or other unincorporated association that is subject to suit under a common name, must be served: (1) in a judicial district of the United States: (A) in the manner prescribed by Rule 4(e)(1) for serving an individual; or (B) by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process and--if the agent is one authorized by statute and the statute so requires--by also mailing a copy of each to the defendant; or (2) at a place not within any judicial district of the United States, in any manner prescribed by Rule 4(f) for serving an individual, except personal delivery under (f)(2)(C)(i)." Rule 4(e)(1) does not authorize service by certified mail. The Court previously ordered Plaintiff to file a status report concerning service on Verizon by 12/3/25, and hereby extends that deadline to 12/19/25; the Court also extends the deadline for the parties' joint status report to 12/29/25. If Plaintiff declines to participate in the preparation and filing of a joint status report, the Court will dismiss the case for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. Mailed notice. (evw, )

Friday, December 12, 2025

INITIAL STATUS Report by Joe Louis Lawrence Related [+] (bi,)
Wednesday, December 10, 2025

STATUS Report by Joe Louis Lawrence on service of Verizon Communications Inc. (Exhibits) Related [+] (men, )

DECEMBER 29, 2025 NONE OF THE FORTUNE 500 SUPER ATTORNEYS COMPLIED WITH THE JUDGES ORDER
NOR DID ANYONE FILE A MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME


Friday, January 02, 2026

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Verizon Communications Inc. Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC's Corporate Disclosures (Kelly, Matthew)

MOTION by Defendant Verizon Communications Inc. for leave to file Verizon Wireless Service, LLC's Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time (Kelly, Matthew)
Att: 1 Exhibit Exhibit A (Verizon's Proposed Answer)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Verizon Communications Inc. by Matthew Douglas Kelly Attorney Appearance for Verizon Wireless Services, LLC (incorrectly named as Verizon Communications, Inc.) (Kelly, Matthew)



  


























No comments:

Post a Comment