Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Sunday, February 10, 2019

HOW BLACK JUDGES "FIX" CASES IN COOK COUNTY CRIMINALIZING INNOCENT MEN OF COLOR SO THAT WHITE ATTORNEYS CAN MAKE MONEY

Read how a Black judge William Stewart Boyd has violated not only his oath and duties to the Illinois Supreme court Rules but oath to the United States Constitution.

As a Masonic Brethern (Boyd) has violated every creed of the fraternal order of the Brotherhood.

My Brother Mr Kabir whom have never had troubles with the laws never been locked up for any reasons who works at the United States Post office downtown Chicago as a Personal Assistant for over 31 years to the Postmaster Chicago District for the United States Postal Service with very near perfect attendance. One of his primary responsibilities is to make sure that all mailboxes are cleared by seeing to to it the mail has arrived at the post office for the next day delivery.

He studied at Morehouse College for 4 years School of Medicine, Master Mason, Past Master, Current Worshipful Master, Officer in Royal Arch Chapter, Officer in Knights Kadosh Consistory, Officer in 32nd Degree Consistory, Prominent member of Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, Prominent member of the Lions Club of America. Director of Lodge "Feed The Homeless Program" in conjunction with the Salvation Army, Director of Lodge Coat Drive for Kids Program in conjunction with The Chicago Public Schools.

He filed for a Divorce (Petition for Dissolution of Marriage) April 20, 2018.

Bernadette was served June 7, 2018.

Bernadette went before judge Renee Goldfarb June 13, 2018 to have her fees waived, the judge granted her a fee waiver to answer the summons without paying any fees.

41 days had elapsed, a Motion for Default was filed with the proper Notice court day was July 20, 2018.

Bernadette appeared in court with her attorney Joan S. Colen with no answer to the summons Petition for Dissolution of Marriage she and her attorney had prepared a counter-petition for Dissolution of Marriage the basis of her "fraudulently" saying she had no knowledge of any divorce proceeding being filed against her.

That because of the legitimacy of Cazembe's Divorce Petition being properly filed and Bernadette was in fact IN DEFAULT, Joan filed a frivolous motion to DISMISS his Petition.

The proper motion Objecting and Striking Bernadette's Motion via her attorney was filed July 23, 2018, court date was July 30, 2018.

Judge Boyd unlawfully DENIED Cazembe's Motion for Default and unlawfully DISMISSED his Petition for Dissolution of Marriage and ORDERED him to respond to Bernadette's attorney Counter-Petition for Dissolution of Marriage.

Unlike the FBI indicting Alderman Edward Burke for attempted Extortion on Burger King owners in this case Boyd was successful using his robe allowing a white attorney to EXTORT MONEY from Cazembe by filing false documents in the court in the guise as maintenance fees for Bernadette.

Judge Boyd became so rageful filled with Contempt unlawfully REMANDED Cazembe into custody primarily because he did not amend his Petition for Dissolution so as to save Boyd from the crime of enforcing court orders outside of his jurisdiction, and ordered he remain in jail until he paid $6855.24. 

Now this white attorney Joan realizing the control she has on Boyd and the Demonic Hate he has for men of color went before Boyd with this very document detailing every "Fraudulent Act" perpetrated at Brother Kabir is expecting the judge to continue to vent his hateful rage at an innocent Masonic Brethern by REMANDING him back into custody because in Cook County Courts racist white men controlling the Democratic Party will not admonish Boyd due to his intimate untouchable status with allegedly Alderman Edward Burke.

On Friday February 8th Boyd Denied the Motion Objecting and Striking the Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al. He said "What do you mean by "Fraud" as it is mentioned in your motion"? Brother Kabir explained that he was acting in a Bias manner denying everything you filed and granting everything the attorney filed not questioning a thing, Boyd said Motion DENIED with vicious hate in a manner to humiliate him for speaking up to what was done wrong, he demonstrated a hate for Cazembe being a man speaking up to him, there was nothing MASCULINE about his behavior or character.

Boyd continuously threatened Cazembe in court reminding him "YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO YOU IF I FIND YOU IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AGAIN? at least 3 times then he said, "YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO YOU DON'T YOU? and YOU KNOW WHAT, I AM GOING TO DO TO YOU?  at least 2 or 3 times.

When Cazembe tried to explain to Boyd that his Affidavit clearly showed he was not able to pay $1700.00 a month due to outstanding debts, Boyd got MAD! told him he had to give her something or make a "GOOD FAITH EFFORT"

Because Cazembe is everything Boyd is not as a man, he is making it clear in his ruling he is GOD and nobody can touch him!

O lord My god is there any help for the W's son? 





IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT, DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
CAZEMBE KABIR,
Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent,
18 D 3208
BERNADETTE KABIR,
Respondent / Counter -Petitioner .
MOTION FOR DEFAULT AND/OR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS
Bernadette Kabir, Respondent/ Counter-Petitioner, by and through her attorney, Joan S . Colen, respectfully requests that this Court find Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent in default or, in the alternative, enter an appropriate order sanctioning for his failure to comply with this Court ' s discovery rules and order, pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219 (c)
In support of this motion, Respondent/ Counter-Petitioner states as follows :

Procedural History of the Case

1.     On April 20, 2018, Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent
(hereinafter "Cazembe") filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage, pro se. The Petition alleged five separate grounds for dissolution, none of which was irreconcilable differences .
2.     On June 7 , 2018, Respondent/ Counter-Petitioner (hereinafter "Bernadette") was served with summons and a copy of the Petition. On June 13, 2018, Bernadette filed her pro se Appearance .
3.     On July 20, 2018, Cazembe filed a Motion for Default Prove-Up, based on the fact that Bernadette had not filed an Answer to his Petition for Dissolution.
4.     Also on July 20, 2018, counsel for Bernadette filed her Additional Appearance as well as Counter-petition for Dissolution of Marriage and a 2-615 Motion to Strike Petitioner' s Petition for Dissolution of Marriage .
5.     On July 23, 2018, Cazembe filed a Motion Objecting and Striking to Bernadette's Counter -Petition for Dissolution of Marriage Due to " Fraudulent" Misrepresentations. 
The Objection was based on the assertedly " fraudulent admission" in
Bernadette 's Counter-Petition that "With the exception of Cazembe's Petition for Dissolution of Marriage in the instant case, Bernadette is unaware of any Petition for Dissolution of
Marriage pending in this or any other county or state . "
6.     On July 26, 2018, Bernadette filed a Motion for Temporary Maintenance .
7.     On July 30, 2018, the Court denied Cazembe's Motion for Default and gave him 21 days to respond to the Motion to Dismiss, setting it for hearing on August 27, 2018. The Court also gave Bernadette leave to file her Counter -Petition, gave Cazembe 21 days to respond to Bernadette's Motion for Temporary Maintenance, and ordered Cazembe to serve his financial affidavit and supporting documents within 14 days .
8.     On August 16, 2018, Cazembe filed a "Motion for Disqualification of Judge for Cause Due to ' Fraud' (Civil Rights Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to S. H. A. 735 ILCS 5/2-
1001 (a) (2, 3) and to Vacate all Orders due to Trespassing upon the Laws' Court never had Jurisdiction Orders are 'Void' a Nullity' " (hereinafter referred to as "SOJ Motion") . That

                                -2-

Motion was heard by Judge Arce on August 27, 2018 and was denied. The case was then sent back to Judge Boyd, but Cazembe did not return to Judge Boyd's courtroom after leaving Judge Arce ' s courtroom. Judge Boyd set a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and the Motion for Temporary Maintenance for September 11, 2018 .
9.     On August 28, 2018, Bernadette served Standard Marital Interrogatories and a Request to Produce Documents on Petitioner .
10.   On September 5, 2018, Cazembe re-filed his Motion Objecting and Striking to Bernadette's Counter-Petition for Dissolution of Marriage Due to " Fraudulent" Misrepresentations .
11.   On September 11, 2018, the Court heard and granted Bernadette's Motion to Dismiss Cazembe's Petition for Dissolution and gave him 21 days to file an Amended Petition for Dissolution. The Court also ordered Cazembe to pay temporary maintenance based on statutory guidelines and continued the case to October 15, 2018 for status .
12.   On September 26, 2018, Cazembe filed a Motion to Reconsider Judge Arce s Order denying his SOJ Motion .
13.   On September 27, 2018, having received no responses to the initial discovery requests, counsel for Bernadette sent a 201k letter to Cazembe .
14.   Also on September 27, 2018, Bernadette filed a Petition for a Rule to Show Cause alleging that Cazembe had failed to pay any maintenance .
15.   On October 2, 2018, having still received no response from Cazembe to discovery, Bernadette filed a Motion to Compel Answers to Discovery and served Notice on Cazembe that the motion

                                     -3-

would be presented to the Court on October 9, 2018 .
16.   On October 9, 2018, Judge Boyd transferred the matter back to Judge Arce for hearing on Cazembe s motion to reconsider the denial of his SOJ motion. Judge Arce heard the matter and denied the motion to reconsider. Judge Arce also sent the case back to Judge Boyd for further proceedings. Judge Boyd entered and continued Bernadette' s Motion to Compel and Petition for Rule to Show Cause to October 15, 2018 .
17.   On October 15, 2018, Cazembe failed to appear in court . The Court set a hearing on Bernadette 's Motion to Compel and Petition for Rule to Show Cause the Motion on December 18, 2018 . That Order further stated that Cazembe 's failure to appear would result in a default order being entered against him. Counsel for Bernadette sent a copy of that Order to Cazembe both by email and by U.S. mail on October 15, 2018 .
18.   On October 29, 2018, Bernadette filed a Motion for Exclusive Possession of Marital Property, set for initial presentment on November 8, 2018, on which date the motion was set for hearing on December 18, 2018 . Cazembe was not in court on November 8 , but counsel for Bernadette sent him a copy of the Order both by email and by U.S. mail on November 8 , 2018 .
19.   On November 26, 2018, Cazembe filed a Motion to Reinstate his Petition for Dissolution of Marriage and noticed it for initial presentment on December 10, on which date the motion was set for hearing on December 18, 2018 .
20.   On December 18, 2018, the Court denied Cazembe 's Motion to Reinstate his Petition for Dissolution, but granted him an additional 14 days to file an Amended Petition for Dissolution of Marriage. The Court Cazembe was found in contempt of court for failure to pay court-ordered maintenance and ordered that he be taken into custody, with a purge of posting $6855 . 24, the amount of unpaid maintenance as of that date. The Court continued the case to December 21, 2018 for status on the purge. Bernadette's pending Motion to Compel and Motion for Exclusive Possession of Marital Property were entered and continued .
21         . On December 21, 2018, Cazembe did not appear in court but had posted bond and been released from custody. Bernadette s pending Motion to Compel and Motion for Exclusive Possession of Marital Property were continued to January 18, 2019 for hearing .
22         . On January 13, 2019, Cazembe served his Financial
Affidavit and copies of various bills and other statements on Bernadette's counsel. On January 15, 2019, he served an amended Financial Affidavit .
23.        On January 18, 2019, Cazembe did not appear in court .
The Court granted Bernadette exclusive possession of 13140 S . Eberhart and ordered Cazembe to respond to the Interrogatories and Request to Produce Documents that had been served on him on August 28. 2018 within 14 days, or by February 1, 2019 . The case was continued to February 8, 2019 for status, and Cazembe was ordered to appear in court on that date. Counsel for Bernadette sent a copy of that Order to Cazembe on January 18, 2019.
24.        Also on January 18, 2019, Bernadette filed a second Petition for Rule to Show Cause because Cazembe had not paid maintenance for the month of January, 2019. The Petition is

               -5-

noticed up for initial presentment on February 8, 2019 .
                 25. On February 5, 2019, Cazembe filed a Motion Objecting & Striking Defendant ' s Petition for Rule to Show Cause Due to  "Fraud" on the Court Court Having No Jurisdiction Orders are a Nullity Extension of Time to Submit Interrogatories & Counter Issuance for Rule To Show Cause and Impose Sanctions Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137". The Motion was noticed for initial presentment on February 8, 2019.

        Motion for Default

26.    As of the filing of this Motion, Cazembe has failed to file an Amended Petition for Dissolution of Marriage, despite having been given two opportunities to do so after his original Petition for Dissolution of Marriage was dismissed pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-615.
27.    As of the filing of this Motion Cazembe has failed to file any response to the Counter -Petition other than his original "Motion Objecting & Striking Respondent 's Counter -Petition Due to
' Fraudulent' Misrepresentations & Issuance of a Rule to Show
Cause for Sanctions and or Remand Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137" which he subsequently re-filed. That objection and motion to strike is baseless and should be stricken with prejudice .
28.    As of the filing of this Motion, Cazembe has failed to appear on 4 of the last 5 court dates .

Motion for Sanctions

29. As of the filing of this Motion, more than 14 days have elapsed since the January 18, 2019 Order compelling Cazembe to

                                        -6-

respond to the Interrogatories and Request to Produce that were served on August 28, 2018 and Cazembe has not responded to either the Interrogatories or the Request to Produce .
30. Cazembe's failure to comply with this Court ' s Order is unreasonable and wilful .
WHEREFORE, Respondent/ Counter-Petitioner Bernadette Kabir respectfully requests that this Court :
A.     Enter an Order finding that find Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent Cazembe Kabir is in default and setting this matter for a prove-up hearing ;
B.     Enter sanctions against Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent Cazembe Kabir for failure to comply with discovery rules and orders . In particular, Respondent/ Counter-Petitioner Bernadette
Kabir requests :
That the Court debar Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent Cazembe Kabir from maintaining any claims or defenses with respect to his financial circumstances ;
B. That the Court debar Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent Cazembe Kabir from filing any other pleading relating to any financial issue ;
     c.   That all claims or defenses asserted in
Petitioner/Counter-Respondent Cazembe Kabir' s Motion Objecting & Striking Respondent 's Counter-Petition Due to ' Fraudulent' Misrepresentations & Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause for Sanctions and or Remand Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137 be dismissed with prejudice;
D.      That a judgment by default be entered against
Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent Cazembe Kabir as to all claims asserted in the Counter-Petition for Dissolution of Marriage ;
E.      That the Court order Petitioner/ Counter-Respondent
Cazembe Kabir to pay for Respondent s attorneys fees to prepare this Motion ;
That the Court order Petitioner to pay a monetary penalty in an appropriate amount; and
G.   That the Court enter such other or further Orders as it deems just and equitable .
Respectfully submitted,
Petitioner
JOAN S. COLEN #41149
77 W. Washington Street Suite 1712
Chicago, Illinois 60602
 312. 701.1075
 jsc@joancolenlaw. com

Saturday, February 9, 2019

TERRORISM SEEMS TO BE WORSE UNDER BLACK AND BROWN AUTHORITY

Neither Dorothy Brown or Toni Preckwinkle etc can save the number of corrupt judges involved in the 88 D 079012 Paternity case it is sad as hell in spite of all the sacrifices so many have made Dr Martin Luther King, Jr, Rosa Parks, Nelson Mandel, Miguel Pro (Father Pro) etc. too many to name stood on the front lines so that we as a people can be free from Jim Crow laws and other forms of racial oppression.

Black and some Hispanic men are some of the worse judges any person of color can go before for justice these men are aware of the injustices perpetrated by racist white judges inflict some of the worse acts of hatred that their white counter-parts for reasons that goes beyond the stretch of human imagination.

Criminals don't fear the laws because they know many of the judges are bigger crooks than them.

Attorney Ken is articulating the same make up how racist white men covered their tracks back in the days as they violated the Civil Rights of people of color now it is the colored people engaging in Terrorist Acts on their people.

Pretty soon the aforementioned Colored Terrorist will be preying on helpless whites and everyone else not in the Fraternal order of Hatred!

I once heard a man say in the wilderness O Lord my God is their any help for the w's son?

Brother Cazembe is being threatened by William Stewart Boyd he is going to lock him up because he refuses to Amend his Divorce Petition that the attorney Joan S. Colen has Defaulted on with his soon to be ex wife Bernadette.

Judge Boyd as a Mason seems to harbor a Hate for Masonic Brothers has been many times Denied NEVER tried Cazembe's on his legal documents properly presented before the courts and has accepted and granted the attorneys documents that has been FRAUDULENTLY presented.

   

WOW!!!!

One thing is for certain you are no Punk! You stood up for your clients and held your ground in spite of the opposition. 

Let me give you an update Ken on Friday Feb 8, I went to the Daley Center checking on a case for a client; however, I decided to check on the very paternity matter you properly notified the proper law enforcement Officials about.

I learned that the entire case had been deleted from the database that shouldn't surprise you or I, but it created a great deal of controversy on the 8th floor.

An audit of some sort was indicated in the system but, I was never notified so I suggested that they rescan the documents back into the system seeing that, I was in receipt of my originals which they did.

We need a special breed of military style Federal Agents apprehending this individuals because at the present we have no Civil legal system. 

Judge Boyd threatened Cazembe in open court to remand him into custody if he didn't respond to the attorney's Petition for Rule to Show Cause but denied his response which was a response Objecting to the Petition. 

Everybody from every ethnic group to talking about how horrible Boyd is but he seems to have job security provided he destroys people of color, I have heard certain whites of minuscule political affiliations were affected as well. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Joe Louis 



kenneth ditkowsky

9:05 AM (3 hours ago)
to 60mSummerme
Dorothy Brown, the clerk of the Circuit Court has been under investigation by the Fed for years.    Indeed, the official records in the County have a tendency to disappear when they embarrass one of the Political elite, or reveal corruption.   In fact, in the hayday of politics in Chicago (during the great depression until OPERATION GREYLORD and/or the building of the Daley Center) the important records were kept on floor 3 1/2 of the County Building and floor 3 1/2 of the Chicago Hall.   

It was well known that storing paper created a fire hazard, and when a Federal Agent was spotted being a bit more than casual spontaneous combustion occurred immediately prior to a weekend, a holiday etc.   Fortuitously the very records that the Federal agent might be interested in reviewing were destroyed.   

The Daley Center was a modern structure designed for accomplishing something rather than housing patronage workers. This architecture malpractice was never prosecuted due to the naivety of the modern Political hack.   They actually believe that the great unwashed are STUPID.   (The Obama Administration made no bones about telling us exactly that!)

Dorothy Brown and her cronies understand that without evidence no one goes to jail and emblazoned the Circuit Court Clerks employee manual are the words: "read and destroy, misfile, or otherwise make disappear any document or communication that she think might be important"    The clerks office is designed to make certain that IRS, FBI, Postal inspectors, et al are thwarted as to any effort to investigate even the smell of corruption.

The "fire in the hole" scenario died when one of the old fashioned Friday afternoon conflagration did more than destroy inconvenient records - it killed a bunch of Patronage workers who did not know that work is a 4 letter word.   Thus, better solutions were found and the computer offered them.

Thus, by coincidence if a file becomes troubling or embarrassing a touch of a button *****.    These glitches are unpredictable and can occur at any time.   Troublesome paper files are a bit more difficult, but with the volume of paper generated in single day misfiling is to be expected.   Patronage workers - everyone knows - are hired because they get the vote out, not because they have office skills.   Even in today's brain dead society everyone employed by LAW ENFORCEMENT is fully aware of such facts.

As an attorney who spend more than 1/2 a century socializing over at the courthouse I can attest to these happenings on a first hand basis.   I had a questionable Supreme Court of Illinois decision sent back to the Appellate Court and assigned to a judge who died several weeks prior to the assignment.   Bill Juno, a reporter for the Chicago Tribune, a year after the assignment traced down the Appellate Court decision of the deceased Judge - in death the Judge was still political - he ruled against my client.    (City of Chicago residence case)

Of course not all cleansing of records favors just the Administration.    I had a case wherein my client was embarrassed.    PC purchased a boat cargo of human hair.   He then set up operations to convert the hair into wigs, and market it in African American neighborhoods to African Americans.

As every one knows (except the media and the Political elite when running for election) these areas of mercantile deserts. PC ran up quite a bill with me dealing with various sundry problems associated with leases etc, and decide to go it alone as to hiring workers for his stores.    He engaged HK to take over the retail problems.

HK had a liberal bent and to my amazement a naivety that was refreshing.   He advertised for people in the neighborhood and he was literally overwhelmed.   He failed to vet his future employees as he had so many applicants and opened his stores.  The raw truth hit him almost immediately.    Internal controls were totally ineffective and he had to address the problem.   He fired everyone.   He then went to the sources he knew and had experience with and he restaffed his stores.

The venture was a total success; however, his terminated employees filed with the EEOC a racial discrimination claim.
HK was still naïve and chose "like kind" representation.   The hearing was "interesting" and reached an expected result.  HK was found guilty of racial discrimination and a substantial judgment recommended.

I was engaged to address the situation.   Administrative hearings are appealable to the Circuit Court.   I read the decision and filed an appeal and a racial discrimination lawsuit against the Illinois commission.   The decision read as follows:  (paraphrase) HK discriminated against Americans,of African/American racial **** who he terminated, so as to employ KOREANS.

At the hearing before Judge Dunn, I listened to the argument advanced by the State, and requested SUMMARY JUDGMENT in favor of my client based upon the argument.   Dunn understood my argument without my saying a word.   (My "Koreans" all were citizens of the United States of America and they were entitled to not be discriminated against by the commission)

The Judge then and there entered a Summary Judgment reversing the panel finding and set the case for further hearing.   

Of course there was no further hearing.   The file in total disappeared and could not be located.   When I called the AG assigned to the case - and who argued before Judge Dunn - he had no memory of the proceeding.   Interestingly enough the proceedings disappeared from the dockets etc.   I never pursued HK's action against the commission.