Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Friday, September 5, 2014


CORRUPTION TERRORISM & RACISM IN CHICAGO ILLINOIS AND COURTS

 WHILE AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE OVERSEAS FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE FOR FOREIGN CITIZENS THIS IS WHAT TERRORISM ON THE LOCAL FRONT IS DOING TO UNITED STATES CITIZENS IN AMERICA

 AMERICA WITNESSED THE INJUSTICES THAT TOOK PART IN FERGUSON MISSOURI INVOLVING MICHAEL BROWN WHO WAS SLAIN BY POLICE;

 IN CHICAGO RACISM IS WELL ORGANIZED TAKE A LOOK AT HOW RACIST IRISH & POLISH JUDGES TOOK PART IN COVERING UP FOR A POLICE OFFICER WHO IMPREGNATED HIS BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTERS TWO OF THEM ONLY HE FRAMED AN INNOCENT MAN TO KEEP FROM GOING TO PRISON.

 THE DAUGHTER WAS EMANCIPATED NOV. 21, 2002 BUT BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE HAS WAYS LIKENED TO THE KU KLUX KLAN OF THE SOUTH MEMBERS OF THAT TERRORIST GROUP HAS BANDED TOGETHER TO DEMONSTRATE THEIR RACIAL HATRED AND CONTROL OVER CHICAGO LEGAL SYSTEM AND CONTROL OVER THE CITY VIOLATING EVERY ASPECT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

 MOST IMPORTANT THIS CASE WAS DISMISSED WHEN RICHARD J. DALEY WAS THE STATES ATTORNEY AND COMMANDER BURGE WAS TORTURING INNOCENT BLACK MEN PLACING THEM ON DEATH ROW.

 REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR NOT A DEMOCRAT ISSUED A MORATORIUM ON THE DEATH PENALTY AND WAS SENT TO PRISON.

 ARE FOREIGN TERRORIST EASIER TO ERADICATE THAN AMERICAN TERRORIST?  

Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services
Division of Child Support
Deerfield, Ill.

Director Rosalinda Drukillo
                                              
Dear Madam                                                                                  September 2, 2014
I have been directed to forward this information to your attention for a response:
As per my conversation today speaking with Ms. Stewart this morning who informed me that a court order was entered April 12, 2010, I have no knowledge of but it was effective Feb. 8, 2007;
She further stated shockingly! Court orders or this case ended 11-21-02, started reading the computer screen said Oh My God! You have had Body attachments on you and you have been Remanded! She said sir, “I want you to know, I am just a customer service employee and that I have nothing to do with this, the mother resides in Deerfield, this case is out there call them up right away because this case have to be reinvestigated”
I provided her a copy of the original case 85 D 068184 where the case was DISMISSED September 17, 1987, “she said there is no record of this case listed anywhere and that she was forwarding this court order to accounting but was not sure how soon they would get to it in Deerfield”
                                                      5th Request NEVER A REPLY
                                                      W/Affidavit
                                 Real Case 85 D 068184         Bogus Case 88 D 079012
                                                                                                  C 01240217
I Joe Louis Lawrence Promise and swear to the following: Notice dated September 30, 2013, which was received September 17, 2013.
SEE THE JULY 12, 2012 POST OF unlawful1.blogspot.com letter from Oct, 2, 2009, Affidavit regarding this same issue nobody ever responded or submitted any reply!
  1. This is a deliberate attempt to extort money!
  1. I never impregnated this woman never was there a court order to pay any child support;
  1. There was never was there any paternity (DNA) tests never ordered to appear in any court.
  1. This case was DISMISSED September 17, 1987 85D 068184 by then States Attorney Richard Daley via Stacey Berman and Obrietta Scott, Assistant States Attorneys;
  1. Under the Richard J Daley’s watch both paternity tests excluded me from paternity but Cook County Director Dr. Boon layangoor and Dr. Oscar Behzad of American Red Cross recorded paternity was in favor of myself but left the factors that demonstrated exclusion in one test the child had something in their blood I did not have in my blood and in another test something was undetected see July 10, 2012 Post unlawful1.blogspot.com;
  1. Because Alderman Edward Burke owns and controls the appointment of all judges appointed had certain Irish and Polish judges personally assigned to “FIX” and racially intimidate and violate every aspect of my Civil Rights for standing up to the Democratic Racist Bullies of the Political Machine had me placed in Contempt of Court and remanded into custody for “Allegedly” owing child support! See Post 8-30-2012, Chronology of unlawful Contempt Charges.
  1. Dorothy Brown’s Clerks were aware of all unlawful irregularities said take this matter to the Media and FBI because they have judges in their back pockets signing court orders illegally “ You don’t owe any child support the court order for 1988 has no signature on it and does not order you to pay any child support”
  1. The only reason why the May 18, 1988 court order is still in the system is because it was never properly vacated;
  2. Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower used her badge and Police authority to commit some of the most diabolical conspiracies ever recorded on paper snaring a plethora of political heavyweights in Chicago!

  1. So that many won’t feel this is an isolated error or typographical error here is another African American man contemplated suicide for going through the same experience for 19 years CHANNEL 2 NEWS REPORTER DOROTHY TUCKER AIRED A STORY WHERE A MAN THREATEN SUICIDE--- Man Hounded For Child Support For 20 Years, But It’s Not His Kid « CBS Chicago http://cbsloc.al/MMxCOA  
  1. CTA destroyed my personnel records to protect the Irish judge who signed a court order allowing my wages to be garnisheed CTA knew the document was in fact an unlawful court order because there was no legal seal on the order many in personnel who was familiar with my case made it clear, “if this shit ever got out a lot of people were going to jail per CTA employee”
  2. These men of the Democratic Political Machine are worse than the Ku KLUX KLAN of the South, Syria Iran have nothing on the type of Mayhem that these Terrorist have lodged on me and others as United States Citizens.
This mess has never been on my Credit Report and was illegally assigned to a politically connected collection agency who attached it to said credit report in Feb. 2007, only after an Assistant States Attorney Brian Volkman illegally obtained my credit report without my permission or the courts authority learned I had excellent credit and no judgments on the credit report.  
Credit scores was 856 after Racism got a hold of my report all of my good standing remarks were mysteriously deleted and a series of convoluted errors were in the report.
Everyone in authority knew of the atrocities lodged in said matter did nothing because the individuals behind these crimes were Caucasian men with clout in the City with incredible connections and most of the people in authority who could have effected a change before this matter got out of hand did nothing!!!
  
   
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.




                                         FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
                    






                                                                                       Joe Louis Lawrence

Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, August 6, 2014



Forward this conversation [

Press ?rd shortcuts.

Posted by at No comments:

Monday, August 4, 2014



Former CHA CEO Woodyard resigned amid sexual harassment allegations

November 18, 2013



Photo courtesy of CHA
Former CHA CEO Charles Woodyard.
Charles Woodyard, the former CEO of the Chicago Housing Authority, left the agency amid sexual harassment allegations, WBEZ has learned.

On Oct. 15, Woodyard abruptly resigned after two years on the job. At the time CHA released a statement that quoted Woodyard as saying “I am pursuing other opportunities that I hope will benefit my family and my career.” Woodyard added he wanted to “spend more time guiding” his teenage son. But on Oct. 14, CHA signed a $99,000 settlement agreement with a former employee. WBEZ obtained the confidential agreement.

The female employee – whose name is redacted in records – alleges that she was a victim of sexual harassment, including physical contact by Woodyard. She alleges that she continues to require medical treatment for physical and emotional distress.
CHA and Woodyard deny the allegations.

"The allegations are false. I never sexually harassed anyone," Woodyard told WBEZ.
The agreement says that one of the public housing agency’s reasons for settling is to avoid the expense and inconvenience of defending itself. The $99,000 includes back wages, attorneys’ fees and medical treatment for the former employee.

“The board took this allegation seriously, and determined it was in the best interest of the agency to settle it,” CHA board chair Z. Scott said in a statement.

In August, the female employee filed a charge of discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that said “during my employment, I was subject to sexual harassment. I complained to Respondent. Subsequently, I was disciplined and discharged. I believe that I have been discriminated against because of my sex, female, and in retaliation for engaging in protected activity.” She indicated that the latest discrimination took place in June.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel appointed Woodyard in 2011. Lewis Jordan, the previous CEO, was pushed out amid questions surrounding CHA credit card use. Woodyard had run the public housing authority in Charlotte, N.C. and has an extensive real estate background. His resignation from CHA took effect Nov. 1.

Beyond the sexual harassment allegations, there had also been concerns about how quickly Woodyard was getting things done. CHA is two years from supposedly finishing its massive original $1.6 billion Plan for Transformation, the blueprint for tearing down public housing and replacing some developments with mixed-income communities. CHA revealed Plan Forward, the second phase of the plan, this past spring. It focuses on acquiring homes in neighborhoods across the city for rehab and boosting economic activity around CHA sites.

The economy and fickle housing market have slowed down progress especially for selling market-rate units. Meanwhile, CHA promised it would rehabilitate or redevelop 25,000 units for public housing families. For fiscal year 2014, CHA plans to deliver 562 public housing units, but none of them will be on mixed-income sites. Originally, the Plan for Transformation was a five-year plan. Today, it’s supposed to be completed by 2015. That would mean the CHA would have to deliver a whopping 7,000 units by then.

Michael Merchant, former commissioner of the city Department of Buildings, is the new CEO.

Posted by at No comments:
CRAIN'S BUSINESS ARTICLE RE SUPERVOUCHERS JULY 28, 2014 POOR FAMILIES RENT IN PRICIEST BUILDINGS WAS MISLEADING:

IN THEORY THE PROGRAM WAS SUPPOSE TO PLACE QUALIFIED FAMILIES THAT MET SPECIFIC CRITERIA S GOOD CREDIT SCORES NO CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS ETC., BUT THE REALITY IS THAT CHA AND VARIOUS BUILDINGS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST PERSONS OF COLOR PROHIBITING THEM FROM MOVING IN AREAS THAT WERE DESCRIBED AS OPPORTUNITY AREAS;

THE SUPERVOUCHER'S ARE IN THE HANDS OF CORRUPT POLITICAL CONNECTED PERSONS WHO DECIDE WHERE THEY WANT PERSONS OF COLOR TO LIVE; THEREBY, KEEPING CHICAGO SEGREGATED!    



                                                        Chicago Housing Authority
                                                            60 East Van Buren
                                                             Chicago, Ill. 60605

Attention:
Team A Madam May
Fax 312 786-6609
                                                                                                              August 3, 2014
Voucher #9727767

            NOTICE OF OFFICIAL COMPLAINT RE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN CHA VOUCHER PROGRAM VIOLATION OF HEARING OFFICERS DIRECTIVE & MOBILITY VOUCHER FRAUD

Dear Madam:

Pursuant to Hearing Officer Fredrick H. Bates (June 11, 2014) DIRECTIVE CHA has circumvented the officers ruling by continuing to retaliate and obstruct any success of Complainant moving in any opportunity area.

That said Mobility program appears to be a front operation disguised to yield the appearance they are placing families like the Complainant in opportunity areas when in actuality whites are placed in units with vouchers, hereto attached, Quote from Streeter Place hand delivered to Candace of the Mobility program, July 31, 2014, for Melanie Toney;

When Complainant was in the other Mobility (2858 North Diversey) program which appeared to be a little better, CHA officials directed Rose Peoples to misrepresent Complainant to prevent him from moving in Streeterville (345 E. Ohio) and directed him to seek residence in Auburn Gresham!
   
A-    Melanie never responded or attempted to set up negotiations of the rents, thereby, validating the veracity said program is used to deter qualified families like the Complainant from moving into opportunity areas said obstructions are implemented so as to allow the 90 day time allotted in which to locate a unit; otherwise, the voucher will expire if a unit is not located forcing families and Complainant to move in gang crime infested areas;

B-    This is how families are systematically removed from the voucher program unlawfully as CHA attempted with my case but was unsuccessful, Hearing Officer reinstated said voucher blacks are the only persons losing their vouchers in this manner never is their whites seeking to have vouchers reinstated, allegedly this is how vouchers are sold allegedly for $1500.00 by removing qualified families from the program illegally!

C-    Leasing Agents questioned the integrity and legitimacy of the program in that they never provided documentation showing Complainant was in the Mobility program;

D-    Emailed sent (July 14, 2014) seeking Chief Hearing Officer and Hearing Officer jurisdiction CHA staff received the email along with 53 other persons nobody replied;
E-     Christine Klepper sent an email stating that the rent in Streeterville is too high, June 11, 2014; her reply, “ YOU SHOULD CONSIDER SOMETHING LESS EXPENSIVE”  
  
An email was sent to Jessie of Mobility (July 15, 2014) Verification of Units in Mobility et al; Melanie received word from CHA to move forward on 121 Chestnut;

An email was sent to Melanie Toney describing said credit scores of 716, (July 10, 2014) and continuous obstructions;

An email was sent to Melanie Toney regarding Voucher Discrimination (July 30, 2014) no reply;

Alby contributed to the Chicago Crain article (July 28, 2014) “Poor Families use supervouchers to rent in cities priciest buildings” is most suspicious because Melanie,

Jessie and Chris Klepper said they had no knowledge of any African Americans being accepted in those units, implies that whites are taking advantage of vouchers using them in opportunity areas, while members of Mobility were steering me to move in Englewood away from opportunity areas because CHA’s Mobility program is an unlawful front disguised to steal money from the Federal government; hereto attached, April 14, 2014 article “Woman alleges housing voucher discrimination in pricey Chicago buildings;

The Chicago’s Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under law issued a report that found rampant racial discrimination in housing;
A-    New report reveals pervasive discrimination in housing voucher program, (April 1, 2014)
 
Congressman Aaron Schock issued a press release (July 28, 2014) Investigation into Chicago Housing Authority “Supervoucher” program.

CHA settled a sexual harassment lawsuit against former CHA CEO Charles Woodyard for $99,000.00 but is continuously discriminating against the Complainant in heinous manners because they have so many politicians in their back pockets and have no regard for the laws.
A-    CHA allegedly had a maintenance person or secretary to impersonate the position of a Commissioner of the City of Chicago Human Relations as they prepared the document and tried to Dismiss the Racial Discrimination Charges against CHA and 345 East Ohio, (March 18, 2014) case #13 H-73 so as to demonstrate their incompetence a signature was required but because of the plethora of “FRAUD” involved they were hoping nobody paid attention to the fraud;

B-    Reliable sources indicate some heavy personnel in CHA are affiliated with individuals in a Bogus paternity case 88 D 079012 in which white racist politically connected judges tried protecting one another with court orders never signed as favors not realizing, I was never the father of a woman’s child who was impregnated by another man, they thought destroying the original court file 85 D 068184 with a court signature DISMISSING the paternity suit made fraud a success;

C-    The person involved is providing Jr. on CHA documents and works in personnel only Jr. is not recorded on any of Complainant’s license or legal documents, now where did Jr. Come from?  











                                                                                  Respectfully submitted

                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence





CC Chg. FBI (Corey B. Nelson), OIG (HUD), Cong Aaron Schock, Crain’s Business, Alby Gallun, WBEZ, Natalie Moore, Sec of Housing, Julian Castro, Media


Posted by at No comments:

Friday, August 1, 2014



Woman alleges housing voucher discrimination in pricey Chicago buildings

April 14, 2014

Tiara is a African-American mother of two small children who longed for a better Chicago public school for her six-year-old son.
Last year, Tiara decided to move out of Bronzeville and began searching for apartments in the pricey River North area.

But when she mentioned she had a housing choice voucher, or Section 8, landlords told Tiara they wouldn’t take her voucher. A few places said “yes” over the phone. So she’d arrive on time, with a paycheck stub and a rental deposit. But no matter -- Tiara says those places rejected her too.
(Courtesy of the CHA)
CHA Opportunity Area Map
Tiara is painfully shy and asked that her last name not be used. As she recounted her story, Tiara dabbed her teary eyes with a tissue.
“I’ve never experienced anything like this. I couldn’t believe it. It still took me awhile to like really come to the fact that I was discriminated against. That hurt so bad,” she said.
Tiara filed complaints against four property owners and management companies with the Chicago Commission on Human Relations. The complaints are currently under review.

Tiara’s allegations aren’t occurring in a vacuum. Earlier this month, the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law issued a report that found rampant racial discrimination in housing.

Tens of thousands of Chicago families rent in the private market using a housing voucher. Renters with vouchers only have to pay a portion of their rent. The Chicago Housing Authority administers the program and picks up the rest. CHA has been criticized for putting families in poor segregated neighborhoods in the city.
In 2011, the public housing agency started a mobility program. In very limited cases, CHA will pay more in rent if a family moves to so-called “opportunity areas.” About 10 percent of voucher holders are in this program.

Opportunity areas are communities with fewer than 20 percent in poverty and low-subsidized housing saturation. That’s how Tiara was able to consider high rises with monthly rents upwards of $3,000 a month.

“It allows families an opportunity to explore areas of the city that they might not otherwise be familiar with,” said Mary Howard, executive vice president of resident services for CHA.
Many neighborhoods with the highest number of vouchers also have the highest poverty and crime rates in the city.

“Families that live in opportunity areas on average have higher earnings than those that do not live in opportunity areas,” Howard said. She added that these areas can have higher retention rates. “So that once a family does move and becomes integrated in their new community, that they’re not moving is success.”

In segregated Chicago, North Side neighborhoods may seem inaccessible for some families in the voucher program. There can be feelings of isolation. CHA has mobility counselors who try to alleviate those concerns.

But that was never an issue for Tiara. She said in her case it was pushback from the rental community. It’s illegal for Chicago landlords to say at the outset that they won’t take Section 8 vouchers.

Danielle McCain is an attorney with the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and she represents Tiara.

“We want her voice heard as a voucher holder. We want these landlords to have to address these issues. Whatever damages we’re able to recover, those are ways in which we can influence landlords going forward not to have conduct such as this in the future,” McCain said.

McClain said housing voucher discrimination is common, and not just in affluent areas. She pointed to her group’s recent report as evidence, but also says a lot of discrimination goes unreported.
As for Tiara, she eventually found a happy ending in a Streeterville apartment building that accepted her voucher.

“I love it,” Tiara said. “You have parks everywhere. You have bus stops everywhere. You have stores, easy to get to. Healthy food. Healthy food almost everywhere. So it’s more like convenience.”
And most importantly, Tiara said, her six-year-old son attends a high-performing public school. And he’s thriving.
is WBEZ’s South Side Bureau reporter. nmoore@wbez.org
Posted by at No comments:


New report reveals pervasive discrimination in housing voucher program

April 1, 2014

(WBEZ/Natalie Moore)
Sign for an apartment that takes a housing choice voucher.
 
The Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law spent two years investigating discrimination in the subsidized housing market and found rampant racial discrimination.
Subsidized housing vouchers, commonly referred to as Section 8, allow families to rent in the private market. A new report outlines the discrimination.

To assess fair housing practices, trained investigators posing as potential tenants inquire about availability, terms and conditions to assess compliance. White and black testers, with comparable backgrounds, tried to rent from landlords.

Landlords already participating in the voucher program discriminated against tenants based on race 33 percent of the time, most commonly by steering them to other buildings or neighborhoods. This also happened based on disabilities 44 percent of the time and against families with children 25 percent of the time.

Landlords in opportunity areas - places with low poverty - who were not participating in the Chicago Housing Authority’s voucher program discriminated against white testers with vouchers 55 percent of the time. In 39 percent of the tests, landlords directly refused to rent to them. And a little more than half of the landlords who told white testers that they accepted vouchers discriminated against African American testers who said they had vouchers. Opportunity areas are an important tool to break up segregation in the housing market; voucher holders tend to be clustered in low-income, segregated black communities.

“Race is still a pressing concern within the city of Chicago and within our region. Even though this happened specifically within Chicago, it’s probably not a surprise to any of us that it’s probably the reality going even beyond that scope,” said Morgan Davis, executive director of the Chicago Area Fair Housing Alliance.

The study was conducted for the CHA. In a statement, the agency said it takes allegations of fair housing violations very seriously and “educates owners, property managers and participants to ensure that federal, state and local fair housing laws are adhered upon. CHA also assists the Chicago Commission on Human Relations in its investigations of potential housing discrimination cases and/or fair housing violations.”
Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, July 29, 2014


RACIAL DISCRIMINATION CORRUPTION CONSPIRACY

TAKE A LOOK AT SYSTEMIC GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND OVERT DISCRIMINATION POLICIES USED TO KEEP PERSONS OF COLOR FROM ADVANCING OR MOVING IN AN IDEAL COMMUNITY SIMPLY BY ACCESSING CREDIT REPORTS HACKING INTO THE FILES DESTROYING FILES IN GOOD STANDING OR IN MY CASE PLACING INFORMATION ON THE CREDIT FILES ILLEGALLY.

IT APPEARS EXPERIAN AND EQUIFAX ARE THE ONLY CREDIT AGENCIES WHERE CORRUPTION IS ABLE TO ACCESS WHY IS THAT?

Dear Mr. Lawrence,
 
Based on the information you provided to us on your fraud alert, we’d like to run an additional credit check from another credit bureau.
 
We wanted to get your permission to do so as the second credit check may negatively impact your credit score. Please respond via email if you would like me to move forward with this screening.
 
Thank you,
 
Lauren



I am confused what are you looking for?

Why would I agree to have you to go into another credit file when the alert is on all credit reporting agencies and negatively affect my credit scores?

I have had a number of corrupt assistant states attorneys working with corrupt judges accessing my credit report hacking into my file deleting all of my excellent remarks resulting to a paternity matter from which don't belong to me.

Credit specialist in special services advised me to set up my account this way, please find examples of fraud an Affidavit sent to Experian Equifax and Transunion scanned to your attention.

September 2, 2013 Affidavit, sent to FBI Experian et al., most important Transunion is the only credit bureau that expeditiously deleted the paternity matter from my files.

April 28, 2014, Letter from CFPB requesting court order dismissing the case.

June 18, 2014, Letter/Fax sent to CFPB.

Madam so that we are clear, I have unequivocally to Mary Grace their is a plethora of law enforcement officials keeping abreast of this matter, the FBI have been assigned to this matter, they don't want 1 or 2 judges they want the entire Klan, the Feds got their wish because the 85 D 068184 court order sent to you court file was suppose to be destroyed which it was but nobody thought, I had a copy.

The 88 D 079012 is a Bogus case used to extort money from me ruin my life and create the necessary mayhem experienced now, I am a victim of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Racial Hate Crimes by judges, Housing Fraud & Discrimination, Extortion, Racial Conspiracy Cover-up.

Now Madam with my scores being in order and I meet all of the necessary criterion's to live and maintain the unit will you respectfully fill out my moving papers so that the business of expediting this matter can get started?

Respectfully submitted 

P.S. Word to the wise take a dollar bill out and read the back of it notice it says "In God We Trust" take heed to those words because nothing is what it seems and nobody is all what they appear to be.

Your Credit information as of 28 days ago:
716 Credit Rating: Good
Your Credit Score as of
Jun 21st, 2014 Log in - Free Credit Scores & Credit Report Monitoring | Credit Karma

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)