“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
held that the Circuit Court of
Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK WAS ONE OF THE JUDGES WHO AUTHORED THE AFOREMENTIONED PRECEDENT COOK COUNTY IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
The United States Supreme
Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it
stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and
convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of
judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley,
case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since
judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become
principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since
no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been
convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
Federal appeals court upholds ex-Speaker Michael Madigan's corruption conviction: 'Not politics as usual'
Joining Scudder on the panel that considered Madigan’s appeal was JudgeFrankEasterbrook, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan’s; andJudgeNancyMaldonado, an appointee of President Joe Biden’s. Scudder was appointed by President Donald Trump.
The Madigan panel heard arguments April 9. Scudder and Maldonado seemed skeptical of Madigan’s position, but Easterbrook remained tight-lipped. He had no questions for Madigan’s lawyer nor for a prosecutor. But in the end, the panel rejected Madigan’s claims.
THE SAME COURT OF APPEALS READING THE CORRUPTION AND EGREGIOUS EXTORTION IN THE CHILD SUPPORT STATE AGENCY WAS ALLEGEDLY DENIED AND IGNORED BY THE VERY JUDGES DENYING AFFIRMING THE JURY CONVICTION OF MICHAEL MADIGAN.
PROCEDURAL
HISTORY
1.
This matter arises out of long‑standing Domestic Relations Case 1988 D 079012,
in which Petitioner has repeatedly weaponized the judicial process, resulting
in wrongful remands, fraudulent enforcement actions, and the deprivation of Respondent’s
employment and liberty.
2.
Petitioner served Certified Mail at her
last known address and States Attorney Kim Foxx, Chief Judge Timothy Calvin
Evans, Gov. JB Pritzker, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul was properly served via Electronic delivery
(email) with Respondent’s filings seeking damages, sanctions, and relief
related to the wrongful enforcement actions.
3.
Despite proper service, Petitioner and the State has failed to file an
Appearance, failed to file any responsive pleading, and has wholly failed to
participate in these proceedings.
A- That Assistant States Attorneys are
appearing before certain judges denying their involvement and is expecting that
judge to frivolously prolong this matter in an attempt to wear down the
Respondent.
B- That the States Attorney never had
legal jurisdiction to bring the Respondent before any court, he was never
SERVED Notice of the State Reopening the 1985 D 068184 matter or they had
enjoined with the 1988 D 079012 of which Respondent was never served in any
matter.
4.
Respondent also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Dec 4, 2023) and a
Motion for Default (Feb 9, 2024)Seeking Monetary Damages $50 Million
Dollars, and Petitioner has again failed to respond and the Assistant
States Attorneys tried deleting their representation of her and failed to Deny,
Object to any of Respondent’s Pleadings accompanied with Affidavits.
PETITION TO SUPPLEMENT PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC3
Yahoo/Sent
by SimpleScan Station. Thank you
Wed, Apr 15 at 1:23 PM
Joe Louis
From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
To:Camille Nicodemus,Hope Blankenberger,Rodney Lewis,Kevin Hogan,Stephen D. Lozier
Attention Hon Chief Judge Charles Beach & Hope Blankenberger & Other Counselors, Judges:
Please find Petition to Supplement Panel Rehearing And Rehearing En Banc
(INCLUDING NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE) & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR ANY ATTORNEY COMMITTING FRAUD ON THE COURT.
THIS CASE IS A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF JUDICIAL RACISM, CORRUPTION & A PLETHORA OF ATTORNEYS WHO LACK BASIC UNDERSTANDINGS OF LEGAL RULES AND PROTOCOLS.
I HAVE HAD SEVERAL ATORNEYS AND LAW FIRMS ON THIS PATERNITY CASE NOBODY SPOKE UP FOR ME OR DID WHAT WAS RIGHT (WILLIAM STEWART BOYD, WAS MY ATTORNEY AND WAS AWARE OF WHAT JUDGE RONALD BARTKOWICZ DID TO ME NEVER FILED ANY DOCUMENTS RECUSING HIMSELF FROM THE CASE AND BECAME A JUDGE---ANYBODY HAVE MY PERMISSION TO DISCUSS MY CASE WITH HIM.
WHEN HE BECAME A JUDGE, HE PRETENDED LIKE HE DIDN'T KNOW ME ON THE PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION, AND REMOVED MY SON FROM MY CUSTODY UNLAWFULLY, JUDGE EDWARD JORDAN RETURNED MY SON BACK TO ME WHEN JUDGE BOYD REFUSED TO RECUSE HIMSELF OFF OF THE DIVORCE MATTER IN THE SAME WAY JUDGE SILVA IS DOING, HON JORDAN TOLD ME NOT TO WORRY ABOUT JUDGE BOYD.
IT'S CLEAR JUSTICE LIES WITHIN THE COURT OF THE BEHOLDER AND NOT IN ACCORDANCE TO ANY LAWS INVOLVING CIVIL RIGHTS OR ANY EQUAL RIGHTS.
COOK COUNTY IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, the very judge who wrote that very ruling or was a part of it's precedent is FRANK EASTERBROOK who is still in the Seventh Circuit.
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2026 at 01:23:48 PM CDT
Subject: PETITION TO SUPPLEMENT PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
Court Order Transferred to Preliminary Judge Calendar E Judge Powers
Yahoo/Sent
Joe Louis
From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
To:ccc.domrelcr1603@cookcountyil.gov
Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Attention Court Coordinator: Estefania Dominguez
On August 11, 2025 Judge Fallon signed a court order 88 D 079012 Recusing herself from the matter and transferring it to judge Powers on the first page of 3 orders the 3rd order, I am not able to identify;
The record reflects Order Change of Venue By Right Allowed. 8/11/2025.
The database is only reflecting one court order and the Clerks reassigned this matter back to Calendar 54 when she has recused herself.
Can you ascertain for me Judge Powers court orders acknowledging receipt in order that this matter be transferred outside of Cook County?
No comments:
Post a Comment