JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IS FINALLY RECOGNIZED IN THE COOK COUNTY COURTS
COOK COUNTY IS NOT A PLACE FOR THE INNOCENT, SENIOR CITIZENS, CITIZENS OF MORAL INTEGRITY OR ANY BLACK OR BROWN MAN OR WOMAN WHO ARE DEEMED FREE MEN OR WOMEN OF THE UNITED STATES
THERE ARE BLACKS NEGROS, AFRIKAN AMERICANS, COLORED SOME BLACKER THAN AN ACE OF SPADE OR CAN PASS AS A CAUCASIAN IN THE GOVERNMENT AS JUDGES, STATES ATTORNEYS ETC HATE THE FUCK OUT OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR SKIN COLOR AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO DESTROY ANY BLACK OR BROWN PERSON THAT COMES BEFORE THEM, THEY ARE THE BOULE NEGROS WHO ARE LIKE THE HOUSE NEGROS ON A PLANTATION, THEY ARE WORSE THAN THE GOOD OL BOYS OR ANY RACIST INDIVIDUAL.
I WANT TO THANK GOD FIRST FOR THE OPPORTUNITY GIVEN TO ME AS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND OTHER MEMBERS OF ALLIED LAW ENFORCEMENT WHO DID NOT JUDGE ME ON THE COMPLEXION OF MY SKIN TONE BUT ON THE MERITS OF MY POTENTIAL LEGAL ABILITIES IN DEMONSTRATING HOW THE CTA, PATERNITY CASE WAS INITIALLY CONNECTED WITH IBC/WONDERBREAD--THE FEDS WANTED TOTAL CORROBORATION AND EVERY JUDGE INVOLVED.
1.) The FBI needed Corroboration
on how this very Paternity Case is connected to IBC/Wonderbread and the CTA,
they didn’t want one or two judges but every last one involved some of them
died on this operation but they received way more information than originally
bargained for because we have judges in Chancery, Appellate Court, Industrial
Commission, State Agency Employees “Fixing” cases, ATU Local 241 Officers and an
interceptor in the Supreme Court’s Clerk’s Office who makes sure cases not go
before any judges of that court without permission of now the Fraternal/Domestic
Terrorists Group “THEY” approval.
2.) The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of
other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3
& 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges
who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted
judges.
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
THE DEMOCRATS HAVE FOUND A WAY TO STILL ENFORCE JIM CROW LAWS AND VIOLATE THE KU KLUX KLAN ACT OF 1871 BY VIOLATING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULINGS BY ACTING AS "PRIVATE CITIZENS" COMMITTNG "TREASON"
See that is why, the Ku
Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section
1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the
Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has
had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act
grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March
23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of
legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout
the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations
of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but
white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were
not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized
Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert
and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the
injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political
principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep.
Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats
belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,
“Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe,
supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is
stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have
been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have
been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., ….
And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or
afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is
clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful
combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et
al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the
conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall
become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a
rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
#DJANGOUNCHAINED FEATURING SAMUEL L JACKSON AS STEPHEN IS A TRUE DEPICTION OF MOST BLACKS IN CHICAGO AND JAMIE FOXX AS A FREE MAN IN CANDYLAND, CHICAGO IS THE REAL DEPICTION OF #DJANGOCHICAGOSTYLE WHICH IS MORE OF A PLANTATION OR STILL A SUNDOWN CITY.
THIS MATTER EXPANDED INTO THE CHANCERY DIVISION OF JUDGES, APPELLATE COURT JUDGES, CHILD SUPPORT EXTORTION, STEALING HOMES IN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES, TAKING CHILDREN FROM MOTHERS TO PREVENT CERTAIN MALES FROM PAYING THE MOTHERS CHILD SUPPORT ETC.
AND ALL CITIZENS MUST COMPLY WITH THE LAW NOW
-- THIS MEANS THAT THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE RAVAGED THE DEAN AND AMY SALLAS
ESTATE, ET AL, EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE OFFICIALS OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS GO TO
JAIL!12
Yahoo/Inbox
kenneth ditkowsky
From:kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
To:ABA
Commission On Law and Aging,ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In
the Profession,ABAJournal.com,ADA Complaints USDOJ.gov FBI,Aging Contact
(Aging)and 101 more...
Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 10:06
PM
When
a man who has a dark hue to his skin is accused of fathering a child out of
wedlock, expect the Justice System to ignore even DNA tests in the effort to
saddle him with support payments. (Read the lament of Mr. Louis)
Under
Biden, it is not racial discrimination to exclude persons who are of Asian
heritage (i.e. have a skin color that is not "white.") Limits
of the Constitution are systematically ignored as they interfere with the
Devine Right of Kings as modified to suit the needs of the political machine
and the fix!
The
result is a mystery to the media and the apologists for the Social Democratic
criminals who are working dilgently to abrogate our Democracy. No one is
immune.
A
sad story is being censored by the media - it involves a little girl
father by none other than Hunter Biden. The disgraceful episode
leaks out from time to time, to wit:
THIS DOCUMENT WAS FILED NOVEMBER 25, AROUND 10:00 ish in the morning AND HAS NOT BEEN DOCKETED IN THE DATABASE
IN THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISIO1N
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge
Petitioner
)
) Cal
VS
)
) No. 88 D
079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room
NOW COMES the Respondent, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro se, and pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2‑1301, Illinois Supreme Court Rules, and the inherent authority of this Court to regulate Domestic Relations proceedings, respectfully moves this Court to enter a DEFAULT against Respondent and set this matter for a PROVE‑UP HEARING on monetary damages. In support thereof, Respondent states as follows:
I.
PROCEDURAL
HISTORY
1.
This matter arises out of long‑standing Domestic Relations Case 1988 D 079012,
in which Petitioner has repeatedly weaponized the judicial process, resulting
in wrongful remands, fraudulent enforcement actions, and the deprivation of Respondent’s
employment and liberty.
2.
Petitioner served Certified Mail at her
last known address and States Attorney Kim Foxx, Chief Judge Timothy Calvin
Evans, Gov. JB Pritzker, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul was properly served via Electronic delivery
(email) with Respondent’s filings seeking damages, sanctions, and relief
related to the wrongful enforcement actions.
3.
Despite proper service, Petitioner and the State has failed to file an
Appearance, failed to file any responsive pleading, and has wholly failed to
participate in these proceedings.
A- That Assistant States Attorneys are
appearing before certain judges denying their involvement and is expecting that
judge to frivolously prolong this matter in an attempt to wear down the
Respondent.
B- That the States Attorney never had
legal jurisdiction to bring the Respondent before any court, he was never
SERVED Notice of the State Reopening the 1985 D 068184 matter or they had
enjoined with the 1988 D 079012 of which Respondent was never served in any
matter.
4.
Respondent also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Dec 4, 2023) and a
Motion for Default (Feb 9, 2024) Seeking Monetary Damages $50 Million
Dollars, and Petitioner has again failed to respond and the Assistant
States Attorneys tried deleting their representation of her and failed to Deny,
Object to any of Respondent’s Pleadings accompanied with Affidavits.
5.
Petitioner’s refusal to answer is not inadvertent. Her past conduct in this
case—combined with her status as a former Chicago Police Officer and her proven
ability to influence judicial actors engaging in Fraud and have the Assistant
States Attorneys to unlawfully represent her on a case that was dismissed September
17, 1987 (case 85 D 068184) refiled in 1988 never served and a Default
Order Entered May 18, 1988 never Vacated or Ordered any Child Support—shows
a willful and strategic refusal to participate to avoid accountability for her
actions with the States Attorney as case 2008 CH 33616 was illegally Foreclosed
Upon and Covered -up, Evicting them of 64 years from their home; Case 2020 D 079452
have not seen or spoken to her daughter since May 19, 2025, due to systemic
fraud and void court orders of Order of Protection
Fraud
admissibility great latitude is
permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. Vigus V.
O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App.
512.
II.
BACKGROUND OF WRONGFUL
REMANDS AND DAMAGES
6.
Between the years following the child support case and the continuing
enforcement actions, Petitioner was wrongfully remanded to custody at least
five (5) times based on fraudulent, fabricated, or improperly issued warrants
for alleged child support arrears.
7.
One such warrant was issued by a former CTA attorney (Ronald Bartkowicz) who,
after becoming a judge in this Court, improperly exercised judicial authority
in a manner inconsistent with due process and in direct conflict with his past
professional relationship to Respondent’s employer (CTA)..
8.
As a direct result of these wrongful remands and the abusive misuse of Domestic
Relations enforcement tools, Respondent was forced off his employment at the
Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) on or about December 1, 1994 and never allowed
to be reinstated as Ken Stephen Ray Attorney with the CTA conspired with
Michael Simmons of Local 241 Secretary who were in an alleged intimate physical
relationship never addressed said Grievance of Dec 1, 1994.
9.
Petitioner suffered severe financial, professional, emotional, and
constitutional harm as a result of Petitioner’s and the assortment of actors
engaging in misconduct and her misuse of police and judicial influence.
10.
The damages arising from the above exceed $50,000,000, and Respondent has
submitted an Affidavit of Damages detailing the basis for this monetary figure.
III.
PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO APPEAR WITH STATES ATTORNEY REPRESENTING HER REQUIRES ENTRY OF DEFAULT
11.
Petitioner is being represented by the States Attorney unlawfully and has
failed to file any responsive pleading
after being duly served.
12.
Under Illinois law, where a Petitioner has been properly served and
fails to appear or respond, default is mandatory for purposes of proceeding to
judgment.
13.
Summary judgment is unnecessary where the Petitioner and her States Attorneys
represented her has wholly failed to participate; instead, the Court should
enter default and permit a prove-up of damages.
14.
Respondent has complied with all notice requirements and has kept the Court and
Entire Judicial Body including Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Evans, Governor JB
Pritzker, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, and Former States Attorney Kim
Foxx and Present States Attorney Eileen O’Neil Burke apprised of each filing.
IV.
DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER DAMAGES ARISING FROM MISUSE
OF ITS PROCESSES
15.
The damages sought arise directly from the issuance and execution of fraudulent
Domestic Relations court warrants, wrongful remands tied directly to this
Court’s enforcement proceedings, and Respondent’s abuse of this Court’s
processes via influence, fraud, and misconduct, judges acting as “Private
Citizens”
16.
A Domestic Relations judge has authority to enter money judgments, including
compensatory damages, sanctions, attorney fees, and punitive damages where
conduct was willful, malicious, or fraudulent.
17.
Because Petitioner’s conduct with numerous State, CTA/Union and judicial actors
occurred within the Domestic Relations enforcement framework, this Court
retains jurisdiction to adjudicate the damages tied to those abuses and or
assign jurisdiction to the Law Division or Federal Court.
V. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE,
Respondent Respectfully requests that this Honorable Court:
A.
ENTER DEFAULT against Petitioner/State for failure to appear and failure
to plead;
B.
SET A PROVE‑UP HEARING on Respondent’s monetary damages;
C.
Allow Respondent to present evidence regarding the five wrongful remands,
fraudulent warrants, loss of CTA employment, and constitutional violations;
D.
Enter a money judgment in the amount of $50,000,000, or such amount proven at
hearing;
E.
Enter any additional relief this Court deems just and appropriate.
Respectfully
submitted,
Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649
joelouis565@yahoo.com
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower
) Judge
Petitioner
)
) Cal
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent
) Room 1903
AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES
I,
Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being first duly sworn, state as follows:
1.
I am the Petitioner in Case 1988 D 079012.
2.
I was wrongfully remanded into custody five separate times due to fraudulent or
improper warrants issued within this Domestic Relations case.
A- See Illegal Warrant drafted by
Judge Bartkowicz, Motion to Disqualify Judge Bartkowicz who admitted that
Petitioners Pleadings were in fact factual et al. Ref as Gr Ex A
3.
These remands directly caused the CTA and Local ATU 241 failure to reinstate
the Respondent back to his employment with the Chicago Transit Authority on
December 1, 1994.
A- See the ILRB questionnaire
requesting Respondent to respond to their allegations of Labor Law Violations
23 Pages CTA never replied, Ref as Gr Ex B.
B- The ILRB never received a record
from the CTA impeaching any of his claims but Dismissed his Petition. We
will reverse the Board’s findings of fact only if they are against the manifest
weight of the evidence. Champaign-Urbana
Public Health District v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel, 354 Ill.
App. 3d 482, 487 (2004). We review the Board’s conclusions of law de novo. Id.
Because it represents a mixed question of fact and law, we will reverse the
Board’s determination only if it is clearly erroneous. SPEED District 802 v.
Warning, 242 Ill. 2d 92, 112 (2011). To so reverse, we must be convinced the
Board committed a mistake. Id. However, we will not defer entirely to the
Board’s determination. Id.
4.
The misconduct leading to these remands involved Petitioner’s misuse of her
authority as a Chicago Police Officer, and States Attorneys fabricating court
documents making her adult daughter a minor
5.
The cumulative financial, emotional, professional, and constitutional damages
exceed $50,000,000, including:
Lost
wages and lost career advancement at CTA, and Loss of opportunity pursuing his
law education at Northwestern University where he received high scores on the
Admissions LSAT Exam.
Career
Loss with the Chicago Police Department, Watch Commander could not walk papers
to the Academy scoring in the top 5-7% of the class due Paternity case having integrity
issues.
Loss
of Employment with the Cook County Sheriff’s Department
Loss
of pension and benefits,
Emotional
distress,
Repeated
unlawful incarceration,
Attorney
fees, costs, and related expenses,
Damage
to reputation,
Long‑term
economic losses.
6.
I certify that the damages sought are true, correct, and supported by the
evidence that will be presented at the prove‑up hearing.
Petitioner,
Counsel Pro Se
___________________________ Notary
Joe
Louis Lawrence
PO Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649
312 965-6455
joelouis565@yahoo.com
Date:
11-25-2025
IN THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISIO1N
)
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge
Petitioner
)
) Cal
VS
)
) No. 88
D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room
PROPOSED ORDER
This
matter coming before the Court on Respondent’s Motion for Entry of Default
and for Setting of Prove‑Up Hearing, the Court being fully advised, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
Petitioner/States Attorney is in DEFAULT for failure to appear and
failure to plead.
2.
This case is set for a PROVE‑UP HEARING on monetary damages on the 31st
day of Dec, 2025 at 9:30 am, courtroom ________.
3.
Respondent shall present evidence regarding damages, including wrongful
remands, employment loss, and any supporting documentation.
4.
The Court retains jurisdiction over all further relief.
ENTERED:
___________________________
Judge
of the Circuit Court
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928
decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the
same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the
government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As
Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds
contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites
anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end
justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order
to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible
retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set
its face."
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISIO1N
)
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower
) Judge
Petitioner
)
) Cal 52
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent
) Room
NOTICE OF
MOTION
FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR, FAILURE TO PLEAD, AND FOR SETTING
OF PROVE-UP HEARING ON MONETARY DAMAGES OR AND ALTERNATIVELY TRANSFER THIS
MATTER TO THE LAW DIVISION
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Motion for Entry of Default et
al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via electronic delivery.
Please
be advised that on Nov. 25, 2025 Respondent has filed before this Domestic
Relations Division Motion For Entry of Default For Failure to Appear, Failure
to Plead, et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before any Judge
Dec 31, 2025 in her/his stead at 10:00 am via zoom. Zoom
Meeting ID: 999
8116 6538
Zoom Passcode: 248664
Hon Judicial Council of the Seventh
Circuit
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon Rosa Marie Silva dmpatel@cookcountycourt.com
Hon James Shapiro james.shapiro@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Patrick Powers estefania.dominguez@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Judge Patricia Fallon CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Judge Patricial Fallon edkouenou@cookcountycourt.com
Hon Michael A. Forti CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Edward Arce Edward.arce@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chavira CCC.DomRelCRCL08cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Abbey
Romanek CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov
sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov Yolanda.simmons@cookcountysao.org
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eilene
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Susan Mendoza Amanda.prentice@illinoiscomptroller.gov
Child Rep Marcellus H. Moore, Jr. 203 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 2100 marcellus@childadvocatelawgroup.com
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Chicago
Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago Ill. 60653
Email
CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org, CaseManagement@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI,
Hon Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City
Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed
to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on Nov 25, 2025 .
Respectfully, Submitted,
__________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill 60649
No comments:
Post a Comment