INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS WHERE ARE YOU AT? A LOOK AT HOW SUNDOWN COURTS PROTECT AND FRAME INNOCENT PEOPLE OF COLOR IN PATERNITY MATTERS, FORECLOSURES, ELDERLY CASES RE GUARDIAN ESTATES AND CHILD CUSTODY MATTERS.
MANY OF THE NEGROES IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAVE ALLOWED THEMSELVES TO BE USED AND EXPOLITED DESTROYING THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS SO AS TO UPHOLD THE DOCTRINES AND CONTINOUS PRACTICES OF JIM CROW LAWS AND SUNDOWN COURTS WHERE JUDGES WHO MAY BE ORIGINALLY FROM TOWNS OR AREAS WHO HATE BLACK OR BROWN PEOPLE ARE JUDGES ON THE BENCHES.
HERE IS A CASE WHERE A NEGROE ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY DELIBERATELY COMMITTED PERJURY TRYING TO PROTECT HER ANGLO-SAXON MASSAS BY TRYING TO CONVINCE JUDGE ROSA, THAT THE STATES ATTORNEY IS NOT INVOLVED IN THIS PATERNITY CHILD SUPPORT MATTER----JUDGE ROSA IN HER ADAMANT DISPOSITION TELLING HER SHE WAS GOING TO READ ALL OF THE PLEADINGS, I FILED WHICH CLEARLY SIT WELL WITH ASA RHONDA SO SHE FILLED OUT THE COURT ORDER WRONG AND TRICKED JUDGE ROSA INTO SIGNING IT SAYING THE DEPT OF HEALTHCARE AND FAMILY SERVICES WAS REPRESENTING ME AND NOT FRANCOISE WHICH IS A BIG LIE
CERTAIN CLERKS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE WENT ON THE DATABASE AND TRIED DELETING DOCUMENTS OF VERACITY FROM ODYSSESY SO AS TO CONTINUE TO "GASLIGHT" MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY INTO THINKING, I MAYBE DELUSIONAL IMAGINING THINGS TO DEFRAY FROM MY RESPONSIBLITIES PAYING CHILD SUPPORT.
THIS WAS NEVER MY CHILD, I HAVE NEVER SIGNED ANY BIRTH CERTIFICATES, NOT ON HER (BOGAN) HIGH SCHOOL RECORDS, A JUDGE ENTERED A COURT ORDER, I WAS NOT TO GO NEAR THE CHILD BECAUSE, I NEVER ADMITTED SHE WAS MY CHILD.
I NEED ALL INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS TO TAKE A TEMPORARY REPRIEVE AT CRITICIZING MAYOR JOHNSON, PRESIDENT TRUMP AND START TARGETING THE INJUSTICES UNDER STATES ATTORNEY EILEEN O'NEIL BURK, COOK COUNTY JUDGES USING THEIR ROBES AS "PRIVATE CITIZENS" "TRESSPASSING UPON THE LAWS"
IF YOU WILL NOT ADDRESS THE TYRANNY AND HORRIFIC KU KLUX KLAN STYLE OF INJUSTICES SEEN IN SUNDOWN TOWNS THAT ARE PRESENT IN COOK COUNTY COURTS--THIS MEANS YOOU AS A MEDIA GROUP ARE ACCEPTING AND CONDONING THE MISTREATMENT OF BLACKS AND BROWN PEOPLE IN COOK COUNTY AND ARE ONLY PRIORITIZING THE RIGHTS OF ILLEGAL CRIMINAL IMMIGRANTS.
I HAVE FAMILY AND FRIENDS IN THE HISPANIC/LATINO COMMUNITY AND IN NO WAY CONDONE THE MISTREATMENT OF HOW ICE IS TREATING HISPANIC WOMEN OR MEN NO MORE DO I CONDONE THE MISTREATMENT OF HOW PEOPLE OF COLOR ARE TREATED IN COOK COUNTY COURTS.
FOR ALMOST 40 YEARS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAVE TARGETED BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE INCARCERATING THEM BY THE TRUCKLOAD FOR CRIMES MANY NEVER COMMITTED, STEALING THE HOMES OF SENIOR CITIZENS AND TAKING CHILDREN FROM INNOCENT PARENTS ETC NOBODY SAID SHIT OR PROTESTED NOW ALL OF SUDDEN PRESIDENT TRUMP IS THE PRESIDENT HE IS BLAMED FOR JIM CROW AND OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE RACIAL HATE, CORRUPTION IDENTIFIED IN THIS CASE.
READ IT AND SHOW ME HOW WAS PRESIDENT TRUMP RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY OF THIS HORRIFIC JIM CROW ACTS.
Additional Sundown Towns in Illinois
Think that’s it? Unfortunately, you’d be wrong.
Illinois has a deeply rooted history of sundown towns. Here are some suspected and confirmed sundown towns in Illionois that were not included in this article. Just so you know, it is A LOT:
Addison, Albers, Albion, Altamont, Alto Pass, Anna, Arcola, Arenzville, Arlington Heights, Arthur, Ashland, Ashley, Assumption, Athens, Atwood, Auburn, Ava, Aviston, Balcom, Barrington, Bartelso, Bartlett, Bartonville, Beardstown, Beaucoup, Beckemeyer, Beecher, Belknap, Bellwood, Bensenville, Benton, Berryville, Berwyn, Bethany, Bloomingdale, Blue Mound, Bluford, Bolingbrook, Bradley, Braidwood, Breese, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Brown County, Brownstown, Buckley, Buckner, Buffalo, Bunker Hill, Bureau, Burr Ridge, Cairo, Calhoun, Calhoun County, Campbell Hill, Cantrall, Carlinville, Carlyle, Carmi, Carterville, Carthage, Cary, Casey, Catlin, Cave-in-Rock, Cherry, Chester, Chicago,
Fri, Sep 26 at 8:17 AMGood morning, Hon Rosa Silva/Team E Judge Patrick Powers:I due- diligently tried ascertaining the name of your court coordinator but was unsuccessful please find the attached:MOTION TO VACATE SEPTEMBER 17, 2025 COURT ORDER INSTANTER DUE TO MISREPRESENTATIONS AND INDUCING COURT TO SIGN CAUSING A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FINDING ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY RHONDA HAWKINS-DYKE TO BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT/DISBARRED FOR HER COMPLICIT ROLE TRYING TO COVER-UP THE STATES UNLAWFUL REPRESENTATION OF FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER WHERE THERE IS NO VALID COURT ORDER OF CHILD SUPPORT BEING OWED DUE TO MAY 18, 1988 COURT ORDER CERTIFIED DEFENDANT IN DEFAULT DUE TO NEVER BEING SERVED et al.I am seeking an Emergency Hearing date, the exhibits attached corroborates unequivocally Negroe women and certain Caucasian Anglo-Saxon women and men in the Child Support Enforcement Division and States Attorney office will lie and attempt to undermine this court's jurisdiction by any means necessary, in that there is a signed court order by the Assistant States Attorney, Page 60 of the Exhibits the States Attorney had a signed court order Make Check Payable to STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT, PO BOX 5400, CAROL STREAM, IL 60197-5400.I was injured fell off a truck but hung on with one arm and tore my rotator cuff at IBC/wonderbread my attorney said my injury was worth $225,000.00 while off work somebody else collected my workman's compensation and I only received Public Aid and had a medical card and a medical coverage with the teamsters, my former attorney David Martay filed papers saying, I returned back to work and had no minor children.On paper it says, I received $40,000.00 when in actuality it was $20,000.00 -$1800.00 for attorney fees and about $43.00 for some other expense.I sued IBC/Wonderbread and was the lead member of a Class-Action suit against them for $350,000.00 million dollars, they retained a law firm Bioff Finucane & Coffey from St Louis to go up against me and later filed bankruptcy, the City sent had attorneys where Judge Michael Forti was the Deputy Corporation Counsel and the CTA had law Professors taking me on.Judge Forti was the Corporation Counsel under Susan Scher when, I litigated against CTA 93 L 10772 where Kent Stephen Ray DEFAULTED on a $33 Million Dollar suit and now as an Assistant States Attorney, they are using their positions to continuously target the Defendant for speaking up and defending himself.Respectfully submitted,Joe Louis Lawrence
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Rosa Silva
Petitioner )
) Cal 52
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent ) Room 1903
MOTION
TO VACATE SEPTEMBER 17, 2025 COURT ORDER INSTANTER DUE TO MISREPRESENTATIONS
AND INDUCING COURT TO SIGN CAUSING A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FINDING ASSISTANT
STATES ATTORNEY RHONDA HAWKINS-DYKE TO BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT/DISBARRED FOR HER COMPLICIT ROLE TRYING TO COVER-UP THE
STATES UNLAWFUL REPRESENTATION OF FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER WHERE THERE IS NO VALID
COURT ORDER OF CHILD SUPPORT BEING OWED DUE TO MAY 18, 1988 COURT ORDER
CERTIFIED DEFENDANT IN DEFAULT DUE TO NEVER BEING SERVED (STATE OF ILLINOIS
AFFIDAVIT PROPERLY NOTARIZED ATTESTING TO THIS VERACITY) AS ASA YOLANDA SIMMONS
VIOLATED THE ETHICS OF RPC 3.3 CORROBORATOING HER INVOLVEMENT COLLUDING WITH
JUDGE FORTI IN SYSTEMIC CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS VERIFYING SAID JUDGES ARE
“PRIVATE CITIZENS” “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES V
RAIMONDO, 603 U,S. 369 (2024) TO
SECTION 42 USC 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE, In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a
cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as
“fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2)
known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the
other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of
the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
1.) That Defendant respectfully emailed the
States Attorney and Courts, hereto attached, Ex A Sept. 23, 2025 email
at 8:28 am, Par 4, “I am the one on Public Aid, the States Attorney
never ever represented but had me REMANDED into custody 5x’s for allegedly
owing child support”
2.) To this date, no response to the email or
any attempt to correct the matter if it was deemed an error which demonstrates
arrogance and vexatious contempt for the laws and a Prima Facie showing
of Ethical violations of RPC 3.3.
3.) That ASA Buchanan stated, Page
12, Line 143 “I did
get the docket number from him, when we
were in the breakout room and then I was able to kind of look at some of the
things that have been filed in the case. But this looks as though it was not a
state involved case, at least certainly not initially with when it was filed
previously”. from the Affidavit
Judge Shapiro Court Hearing Sept. 5, 2025, filed Sept. 9, 2025
A-
Judge
Shapiro asked Page 13,
Line 145 “Is that right?
Alright, alright”
B-
ASA
Buchanan stated, Page 13,
Line 146, At least not as far as HFS would be involved. As far as this
case, he might have provided notice to the state. I think that that was what it
was that he was stating that when he had provided notice, he did notice things
up to multiple as I could see on the notice of filing, it went to multiple
places, your honor, and one of them was, I think the state of Illinois. In and
of itself, and then through our State’s Attorney’s office. But this isn’t
something that Health Care and Family Services would be involved in.
4.) That Judge Forti stated, Gr Ex
A Page 4, Lines 1-3 from the Notice of Judge Forti Continuing the Dec 9, 2024 Motion
Call to Friday Dec 13 at 11:00am (See the State of Illinois Affidavit March
24, 2025).
Judge Forti: And did you give notice to Miss Simmons?
Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes, Sir.
Judge Forti: All right. I’ll see you at 10:00 o’clock.
I’ve also emailed Miss Simmons to see if she got a copy of her notice. But I’ll
see you at 10:00 o’clock.
That Defendant sent to another Agencies of the events that
transpired Dec. 13, 2024 Court Hearing between Judge Forti and ASA Yolanda
Simmons.
Judge Forti: I am letting him Miss
Simmons know that you filed this motion for default. And I want to know what
Miss Simmons’s position is now.
ASA: At this time, I have received some emails on
this case. From Scannicchio Clerk as well as from our own internal policies on
how we handle with these cases. Your honor. I’m going to have to set this for
brief continuance and get more clarification from my supervised attorney about
how we handle these types of cases given the nature of what Mr. Lawrence has
filed. So what date?
Judge Forti: So what day?
ASA: I want to say this for
January 30th. I’m sorry. January 3rd.
5.)
Judge Forti and ASA Yolanda Simmons never had any
type of Court on Jan 3, 2025, Cook County Sheriff’s informed the Defendant
years ago never appear on any afternoon call this is how judges set up people
to send them to Cook County jail, so an email was sent March 25, 2025 seeking a
Court Date for the Default Motion, as Gr Ex B.
6.)
7.)
That
On Dec 4, 2023, 2023, Respondent filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and
Default Judgment of $50 million dollars, February 9, 2024 properly served on
all parties pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 11 and local rules
8.)
That Petitioner being represented by the States
Attorney nor herself failed to file a response or objection. Under Illinois
Supreme Court Rule 191 and Rule 56, the factual allegations and statements in
support of summary judgment were deemed admitted.
9.)
That Judge Michael Forti, presiding over this matter,
subsequently recused himself on May 9,
2025 via Hearing where an affidavit was filed May 12, 2025 in the Clerk of Cook
County verified said admissions.
10.)
That despite
having recused himself, Judge Forti entered an order
back dating to May 9, 2025 but entered May 12, 2025 and emailed to Respondent
May 13, 2025 at 5:05am dismissing the Petitioner’s Motion, referring to it
incorrectly as a “Petition,” and stating that the case is “off call.”
11.)
That it is well-settled law in Illinois that a judge
who has recused themselves may no longer take judicial
action in a matter. Any such action is beyond their authority
and is void ab initio. See In
re Marriage of Petersen, 319 Ill. App. 3d 325, 327 (1st Dist.
2001) (“A void order may be attacked at any time.”).
12.)
The judge’s action deprived said Respondent of due process and constitutes a violation of
judicial ethics under Canon 2, Rule 2.11 of the
Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct.
13.)
That Page 5, Par 13 of the Summary Judgment is an
admission demonstrating Blacks, Negros, Colored etc. have no authority over
Anglo Saxon judges within the judiciary, most importantly to further amplify
said veracity the Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Evans whom Judge Forti is
subordinate to and laws of the Appellate Court and Supreme Court rules
have vexatiously with “Damnosis” Contempt
issued rulings of Bias, Hatred and in a Terrorist manner which is systematic to
all Civil Rights Violations, by unlawfully Dismissing a legal Default trying to
“FIX” said case in an attempt to save his kind of people caught up in
this matter.
14.)
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a
cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement
of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of
inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons
V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d
354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller
457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court
has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
That
Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886
8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. here are
other cases of Fraud
15.)
US Bank et al vs Monzella
Johnson et al. 2008 CH 33616 case vacated HOW A CERTIFIED COURT ORDER (OCT. 29, 2024) OF JUDGE PAMELA
GILLESPIE VACATING FORECLOSURE JUNE 10, 2010, AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE
COURT 5TH DIVISION DEC. 30, 2011, whereby, attorneys emailed
Judge Derico with instructions on how to construct a court order so as to
unlawfully evict senior citizens from their home of 64 years before
Thanksgiving 2024, Black or certain Latino judges are only appointed to the
bench or state agencies to fulfill the doctrines of hate and racial oppression
on their own ethnic groups no other group.
16.)
In Re M. G.W Case #2020 D 79452 a case very similar to the 88 D 079012 is
fraught with fraud and corruption where former judge David Haracz signed an
Allocation Order refusing a trial and signed the court order (November 4, 2021)
without any of the parties or their attorneys and Judge Forti is using that
fraudulent document to remove the child from the mother unlawfully, furthermore
demonstrating his untouchable status as a homosexual terrorizing a Black woman
because nobody Black or of competent authority can admonish him, said orders are
a Nullity/Void and needs to be vacated instanter.
A-
Fraudulent Allocation
Court Order hereto attached, Ex A, How an Allocation should be presented Page
13 AGREED ALLOCATION OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND PARENTING PLAN Ex B
B-
Allocation Order
violated Illinois: 750 ILCS 5/602.10 (Parenting Plan),
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 924
C- Drafting the Allocation
Judgment
Typically,
one attorney (often the petitioner’s) drafts the proposed judgment.
D-
Review and Agreement
Signature and Filing
E-
Once
finalized:
a.
Both parties sign the judgment (or
their attorneys if permitted).
b.
Attorneys sign to indicate approval
as to form and substance.
F-
The final
version is filed with the clerk of the court.
17.)
Respondent has
exhausted nearly $50,000 for legal representation, not one motion was ever
adjudicated hereto attached Partial Responses to Complaint to the ARDC #2023
IN02076
A- The Attorney for the A.R.D.C. Michael Rusch
in his Oct 2, 2023 reply Page 2 Par 1, Lines 2-4 Based on
conversations with you, Beerman Law requested a full trial before the judge.
The court denied that request et al.
B- That Par 2, Line 3-5 “Regarding Beermann Law, you stated that
Beermann Law failed to challenge the judge, demand a fair trial, or appeal the
judge’s decision et al. further demonstrating the following:
A-
Public
Corruption
B-
Abuse
of Authority under color of law (18 U. S. C. 242)
C-
Bribery
or honest services fraud (18 U.S.C. 1341, 1346, 666)
D-
Civil
Rights violations
18.)
That because of the Unlawful Court Order Void in its entirety in
reference to Par 11 A, Judge Forti has Induced Reliance on an INNOCENT
RESPONDENT, predicated from a plethora of fraudulent court orders causing harm
to her by illegally signing a COURT ORDER MAY 8, 2025 FOR AN INTERIM ORDER OF
PROTECTION ET AL. THE COURT HEREBY FINDS A. SHEMICA HAS ABSCONDED, CONCEALED
AND KIDNAPPED THE MINOR CHILD et al. “RIDICULOUS
SLANDER OF A JUDGE”
19.)
That a Rule to Show Cause for SHEMICA’S failure to pay CHILD
REPRESENTATIVE FEES ET AL.
20.)
That #5 of the order states, “This matter is set for return on
the Order of Protection for November 12, 2025 et al”. “LITIGIOUSLY
PROLONGED SO MANY CAN PROFIT”
21.)
That Judge Forti further violated 18 U.S.C. 242 by
authorizing the COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS TO SERVE THESE UNLAWFUL DOCUMENTS DUE TO
HIS WRECKLESS DISREGARD FOR ANY LAWS.
22.)
JUDGE FORTI SIGNED A COURT ORDER MAY 9, 2025, ON A RULE TO SHOW
CAUSE: COURT FINDS A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF INDIRECT CIVIL CONTEMPT….FOR FAILURE
TO PAY THE CHILD REPRESENTATIVE’S RETAINER, CONTINUED TO AUG 25, 2025.
23.)
That on Monday May 19, 2025, Respondent’s daughter was removed
from her custody in the State of Indiana where she fled for her safety and
has NEVER BEEN UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF COOK COUNTY ONCE JUDGE DAVID E. HARACZ
SIGNED THE VOID COURT ORDER OF NOV. 21, 2021.
24.)
That an email reply (May 19, 2025) from a
retired attorney further articulating the corruption in Cook County Courts
ignored, hereto attached, Ex 3 Page 2, Par 2 How does an ordinary citizen in Illinois
obtain Justice? ---The answer is simple, he/she just does not.
A- To
further amplify the veracity of the aforementioned claim Judge Forti and other
racist judges have used racial hate, Terrorism “Lynching tactics covering up
sordid Civil Rights Violations (40 years) on a Paternity case knowing
Respondent was framed and not only wasn’t his child but forcing him to pay for
an incest matter of a biological Police officer impregnating his daughters, but
because of his skin color and being a Heterosexual, they want the FBI and
everyone to know that they can Criminalize any innocent person to achieve their
satisfaction.
B- That
as if the aforementioned isn’t enough to make the average person puke trying to
ascertain these demonic acts, Respondent Shemica Taylor a mother with no
criminal record, no DCFS record of any sort and due to the alleged
Homosexual/Bisexual and racial hatred of her being a loving Heterosexual mother
has been criminalized and defamed entirely claiming she kidnapped her own
biological child. “sic” “CASE PROLONGED NOW 5 YEARS”
25.)
The
message is clear to all RESPECTABLE MEN OR WOMEN regardless to your skin color,
YOUR MOTHER, AUNT OR DAUGHTERS, GRANDMOTHERS ETC CAN BE RAPED ABUSED, EVICTED
UNLAWFULLY OR GUARDIANS OF COOK COUNTY and be robbed and get a judge like
Forti, Romanek, Derico etc. and the crimes of all perpetrators will be
egregiously covered-up demonstrating no justice can ever be had in any COOK
COUNTY COURTS.
MEMORANDUM
FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES #14219
SUBJECT:
DIRECTING THE REPEAL OF UNLAWFUL REGULATIONS
Promoting economic growth and American
innovation are top priorities of this Administration. Unlawful,
unnecessary, and onerous regulations impede these objectives and impose massive
costs on American consumers and American businesses. In recent years, the
Supreme Court has issued a series of decisions that recognize appropriate
constitutional boundaries on the power of unelected bureaucrats and that
restore checks on unlawful agency actions. Yet, despite these critical
course corrections, unlawful regulations — often promulgated in reliance on
now-superseded Supreme Court decisions — remain on the books.
Consistent with these priorities and with
my commitment to restore fidelity to the Constitution, on February 19, 2025,
I issued Executive Order 14219 (Ensuring Lawful Governance and
Implementing the President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Deregulatory
Initiative). It directed the heads of all
executive departments and agencies to identify certain categories of unlawful
and potentially unlawful regulations within 60 days and begin plans to repeal
them. This review-and-repeal effort shall prioritize evaluating each
existing regulation’s lawfulness under the following United States Supreme
Court decisions:
A-
State Agencies and Judges have demonstrated
anarchy and chaos in the courts needing Federal intervention because this is a
40 year (“Fixed Incest Paternity case) old case and judges and state agencies
have demonstrated how they are able to violate and circumvent the laws of the
US Constitution and still enforce Jim Crow Laws outlawed by the US Supreme
Court.
26.)
THAT COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT HONOR OR ABIDE BY ANY LAWS OF THE
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
A- Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of
applicable court rules and procedures”
B-
The Seventh Circuit
Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court
of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
27.)
That because Judge Forti did not enter a court order into the
record from the May 9, 2025, 9:00am Hearing, said State of Illinois
Affidavit is being filed, Particularizing all events that transpired in
that court corroborating “Fraud” and “Corruption”
28.)
That years ago a Judge of Jewish ethnicity and of impeccable
integrity advised me to always obtain a court order from a judge anytime you
appear before him and an Irish Judge Patrick McGann told me to never appear in
any court on Hearsay information.
A-
Case 88 D 079012 Aug 3, 1988 vacating wrong date of defective
service of Feb 24, not Feb 24, 1988 caused the May 18, 1988 DEFAULT to stand
never ordering child support, causing all court orders afterwards to be deemed
Void/a Nullity.
B-
Respondent served Courtesy Copy IV via email April 28, 2025,
to Judge Forti and members of the Judiciary as well as the Judicial Council of
the Seventh Circuit, particularizing the racist hateful terrorist criminal acts
of him and all of his kind has participated in and are guilty of.
C-
Because of Respondents skin color and not being intimidated or
bullied by him or the state he has recused himself from the matter when he
never was supposed to be on the case in the first place.
1.)
The Summary Judgment was filed Dec 4, 2023
and was ignored and thereby admitted too in its entirety Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary
must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party
contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a
judgment as a matter of law."
This statement of
material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific
references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting
materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing
summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of
material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each
numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of
any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the
record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very
clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the
moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of
the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
2.)
That
the Default was filed Feb. 9, 2024 and methodically particularized all
documents filed with affidavits and never denied or objected to but the judges
mistook him as being a pushover simply because of their alleged skin color or
alleged homosexual fraternal liaisons.
In the matter of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7th Cir. 2013) ) The Court,
nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for
Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on
their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment
motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.
29.) That ASA Rhonda had information about Francoise “So but if I can explain to him there is
absolutely, literally nothing we can do ‘cause his entire balance is owed to
Francois Hightower. I don’t even see him owing anything to the State. If Ms.
Hightower does not waive it, there’s nothing we can do”. receiving money and no
other ASA not even Yolanda Simmons ever made those assertions or impeached the
veracity of any of Respondents pleadings but made irrelevant statements in the
court and violated the sections of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, RPC 3.3…
. Enforcement of a Void Judgment
The
May 8, 1996, court order, which has been used to enforce child support
obligations against me and, is void ab initio due to the existence of an
unvacated prior order dated May 18, 1988. The enforcement of a void judgment
violates due process rights, that the original order (1988) superseded everything
else.
- “A void judgment is one which,
from its inception, is a complete nullity and without legal effect.”
— People v. Wade, 116 Ill. 2d 1, 506 N.E.2d 954 (1987)
- “A judgment is void if it
violated due process.”
— Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938)
2. Falsification of Court Records
There
is evidence suggesting that Assistant State’s Attorneys and others, along with
CTA General Attorney, participated in altering official records to misrepresent
Tycee’s age, thereby falsely establishing minor status to justify child support
enforcement, The
State’s Attorney and others are accused of backdating or altering a birthdate
to make someone a minor again, likely to continue child support obligations
past their lawful limit are egregious within the laws itself and demonstrates
serious criminal allegations being covered up.
- “Fraud upon the court… vitiates
the entire proceeding.”
— People v. Sterling, 357 Ill. 354, 192 N.E. 229 (1934)
- “Fraud upon the court is fraud
which is directed to the judicial machinery itself.”
— Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985)
Such
actions, not only undermine the judicial process but may also constitute
criminal offenses under:
- 720 ILCS 5/17-3 – Forgery
- 720 ILCS 5/33-3 – Official
Misconduct
3.
Unlawful Arrest and Retaliation
In
1994, a former CTA attorney in the workman’s compensation division Judge issued
a warrant leading to my arrest and the removal of my CTA badge while I was
handcuffed. This action appears to have been retaliatory, stemming from my
prior complaints against systemic racism and injustice at the CTA for not
paying any workman’s compensation while off work injured on duty ( a drunk
police officer totaled his van on my rear bumper while standing still on a CTA
bus)
Police
Officer levied a false allegation complaint where an Order of Protection was
never served on me and had no knowledge of but was arrested and Remanded into
custody.
- “A person has a constitutional
right to be free from arrest unless probable cause exists.”
— Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964)
- “Retaliation for the exercise
of constitutional rights is actionable under § 1983.”
— Mt. Healthy City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S.
274 (1977)
If
the arrest was indeed retaliatory, it constitutes a violation of my First and
Fourth Amendment rights.
4.
Denial of Due Process
The
persistent handling of my case by certain judges, despite evident conflicts of
interest and potential biases, raises concerns about forum shopping and denial
of a fair trial. The
case is kept in front of certain judges to ensure a predetermined outcome due
to racial bias or corruption
- “A fair trial in a fair
tribunal is a basic requirement of due process.”
— In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133 (1955)
- “Due process of law requires
that a party be accorded procedural fairness, i.e., given notice and an
opportunity to be heard.”
— Fiallo v. Lee, No. 1-04-0440 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005)
5.
Improper Enforcement and Financial Extortion
The
enforcement of the 1996 order, despite its void status, has led to unauthorized
wage garnishments and financial penalties, effectively amounting to extortion
under the guise of legal authority.
- “The knowing use of a void
judgment as a basis for legal enforcement can constitute fraud.”
— People ex rel. Brzica v. Village of Lake Barrington, 268 Ill.
App. 3d 420 (1994)
Such
actions may also violate federal statutes, including:
- 18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Frauds and
Swindles
- 18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation
of Rights Under Color of Law
6.
Federal Implications and Need for Oversight
Given
the involvement of public officials and potential systemic misconduct, this
matter may fall under the purview of federal oversight agencies, including the
FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice.
Based
on the aforementioned, my Prayer for Relief respectfully requests:
- Immediate suspension of all
enforcement actions related to the May 8, 1996, order.
- Transfer My Summary Judgment,
Default Judgment & Motion to Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary
and Appoint a Special Prosecutor et al. to another venue free of Bias.
- Comprehensive investigation
into the alleged misconduct by the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board and
other appropriate bodies who have ignored all my complaints
- Referral of this matter to
federal authorities for potential civil rights violations.
- Vacate all Court Orders that
Judge Forti unlawfully signed having Respondent Shemica Taylor’s kidnapped
daughter RETURNED BACK INTO HER CUSTODY INSTANTER.
Given
the involvement of public officials and potential systemic misconduct, this
matter may fall under the purview of federal oversight agencies, including the
FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice.
In addition to the above, My Prayer for Relief
respectfully requests:
- Immediate suspension of all
enforcement actions related to the May 8, 1996, order.
- Comprehensive investigation
into the alleged misconduct by the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board and
other appropriate bodies.
- Referral of this matter to
federal authorities for potential civil rights violations.
- Rule to Show Cause against all
parties complicit in the Criminal Enterprise of Cook County with a Body
Attachment Instanter.
The
actions described herein represent not only personal grievances but also
potential systemic failures within our judicial system. Upholding the rule of
law and ensuring justice requires that such allegations be thoroughly
investigated and addressed.
1.) The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged
the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney
was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation
Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in
Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133
(June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of
other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3
& 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges
who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted
judges.
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
30.) Pembaur
v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case
that clarified a previous case, Monell v.
Department of Social Services (1978), and
established that municipalities can be held liable even for a single decision
that is improperly made, State Agency colluded with a plethora of other
agencies violating the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 and Civil rights Act of 1866
and Mansell v Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372
F 2d.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never
Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency
of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if
not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first
time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E.
2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
This case is
originally over Sept. 17, 1987 by former States Attorney Richard J. Daley, the
only Irish person who followed the laws and respected the Respondent and his
Attorney Robert A. Egan but was illegally bought back without Respondents
knowledge and was Defaulted May 18, 1988 and never vacated, but this has been
admitted to via Summary Judgment and is being ignored as so many are trying to
continuously cover this matter up even after Defaulting.
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis
Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned
pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the
undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are
true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis
Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE )
)
Francoise
Hightower ) Judge Rosa Silva
Petitioner )
) Cal 52
VS )
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence )
Respondent ) Room 1903
NOTICE OF MOTION
TO VACATE ET AL.
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice of Motion to Vacate et
al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular/electronic delivery.
Hon Judicial Council of the Seventh
Circuit
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon Rosa Silva CCC.DomRelCR1903@cookcountyil.gov
Hon James Shapiro CCC.DomRELCR2103A@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Patrick Powers
CCC.DomRelCR1603@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Judge Patricia Fallon
CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Michael A. Forti
CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chavira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Abbey
Romanek CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov
sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov Yolanda.simmons@cookcountysao.org
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eilene
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
independent.inspectorgeneral@cookcountyil.gov
Injustice Watch
mayadukmasova@injusticewatch.org
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave,
Chicago Ill. 60653
Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI,
Hon
Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
press@cookcountyil.gov
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed
to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on Sept. 25, 2025 .
________________________
Respectfully Submitted,
Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrenc
No comments:
Post a Comment