Wed, Jun 11 at 11:05 AM
Wed, Jun 11 at 1:47 PMAttention Judge Patricia Fallon:The Clerk of Court has provided me with your email of CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov the problem with this email is that it is assigned to Calendar 63 which it appears to be in the Chancery Division.I am trying to prepare an EMERGENCY MOTION to get into your court before August 11, 2025, because of the horrific shit, I have recently learned Judge Forti and Kent Stephen Ray (States Attorney) have orchestrated behind the scenes as Francoise Hightower as a Police Officer colluded with these individuals destroying my life coming after my back pay from the CTA, that the CTA never disbursed because they allegedly paid off so many people is probably why they are claiming they are broke now.However, I called Judge Forti's chambers Thursday and spoke to his coordinator and informed her that Judge Forti was a City Attorney when, I was suing the CTA and the Paternity case was connected to that suit because a CTA judge issue a bogus warrant against me, her reply was in shock, I explained to her that, I had a court reporter coming Monday and I just want to make sure, this matter was still on the call for Monday June 9, 2025 at 10:00am.She stated, yes, it is.She immediately called back and said Judge Forti said not to report to court he was recusing himself; I asked her if I was going to receive any proof, she requested my email professionally where my perception was that an email was forthcoming and it did.So, Judge Fallon, I am not sure if, I am emailing you because these people have played vicious psychotic games with my life and the lives of women with children namely Shemica Taylor who has not seen or spoken to her daughter after she was kidnapped from her grammar school in Indiana on a Bogus Order of Protection Judge Forti signed which is a norm for these alleged KU KLUX KLAN judges who are using the unlawful authority of their robes to incite a different form of LYNCHING, by employing INJUSTICES, TERRORISM, ORDERS OF PROTECTIONS, UNLAWFUL REMANDS, HELL I WAS LOCKED UP 5'X'S FOR ALLEGEDLY OWEING CHILD SUPPORT and everybody in COOK COUNTY KNOWS OF THIS BUT BECAUSE OF MY SKIN COLOR AND BEING A MASCULINE HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN, THEY HAVE MADE IT CLEAR TO ME IF I WANT JUSTICE GET OUT OF COOK COUNTY.Judge Fallon as a former Assistant States Attorney, YOU DON'T need 2 months to recuse yourself--"JUSTICE TOO LONG DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED" DR. MARTIN LUTHER KINGRespectfully submitted,Joe Louis LawrencePS Your Honor the FBI is truly following this matter!
THE FOLLOWING CASE WAS FILED JUNE 11TH 2025 AND THE PHONE NUMBER ASSIGNED WAS 312 603-1271 WHICH PROMPTED ANOTHER JUDGES COURT ROOM CALENDAR 63.
THE HOMOSEXUALS AND RACISTS JUDGES CLERKS WHO HAVE TAKEN SEIZE OF THE JUDICIARY HATING HETEROSEXUAL FREEMEN OR WOMEN ESPECIALLY THOSE WITH CHILDREN CONDONING INCEST OR PEDOPHILIA OR THE ELDERLY BY HAVING AN ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL JUDGE AUTHORIZE THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS TO EVICT THEM FROM THEIR HOME OF 65 YEARS FOR US BANK IN AN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE ON A CASE DISMISSED
a. That the signed Court Order as of June 2, 2010, by Cook County Judge Gillespie “THIS COURT ON IT’S OWN MOTION VACATES THE JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE FOR LACK OF A PROPER AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT”
The Affidavit that the Appellees presented to the Court of
Cook County was an AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
a.
That the Appellate Court AFFIRMED, Judge
Gillespie’s Ruling “That Defendant filed an Appeal with due-diligence trying
emphatically to save their family home and was before another group of judges
and the APPELLATE COURT- AFFIRMED Judge Gillespie’s Court Order, hereto
attached, Gr Ex B August 30, 2012, Judges Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr.,
Joseph Gordon, James R. Epstein”.
READ HOW NOT JUST THE RACIST BUT HOMOSEXUAL JUDGES AND CLERKS ENGAGE IN HATE CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS NOT OF THEIR SEXUALITY COMMITTING GENOCIDE AND APARTHEID IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO, STATE OF ILLINOIS COURTS AND STATE AGENCIES.
Unanimous Supreme Court deals fatal blow to extreme identity politics https://www.newsbreak.com/share/4043999607549-unanimous-supreme-court-deals-fatal-blow-to-extreme-identity-politics?
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower ) Judge Patricia Fallon
Petitioner )
) Cal 54
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence )
Respondent ) Room CL 12
MOTION
TO RECUSE HON PATRICIA FALLON DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST PRIOR ASSOCIATION TO
THE STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE WHERE ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL KENT STEPHEN RAY FORMER
GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE CTA USED HIS UNLAWFUL JURISDICTION DESTROYING PERSONNEL
RECORDS OF RESPONDENT AND ENGINEERED THE FALSIFICATION AND COLLUSION WITH HIS
ALLEGED FORMER EX JUDGE FORTI WHO WAS A CORPORATION ATTORNEY IN CITY HALL WHO
HAS STALKED THE RESPONDENT SINCE 1994 AIDING AND ABETTING IN RACIAL HATE
CONSPIRACIES ON CASE 93 L010772 (JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE VS CTA) AS CHIEF ASST COUNSEL
& USED HIS ROBE VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT AND SHEMICA TAYLOR
ISSUING THE UNLAWFUL ORDER OF PROTECTION AGAINST HER KEEPING HER FROM HER
NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER AS LAW FIRMS SOUGHT OUTRAGEOUS LEGAL FEES WHERE
JUDGE FORTI IS SEEKING TO REMAND HER INTO CUSTODY ON A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE NOT
PAYING AN ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL CHILD REP- REQUEST FOR RE NOTICE OF RECUSING THE
ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND
APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT
STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO, ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S
STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF
BACKDATING RECORDS ET AL. JUDGE FORTI HAVE RECUSED HIMSELF JUNE 5, 2025 BUT FAILED TO
VACATE ANY COURT ORDERS IN SPITE OF HIS CRIMINAL ASSOCIATIONS SIGNING COURT
ORDERS FOR ALL PARTICIPANTS ASSOCIATED IN THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF COOK
COUNTY, WHERE ALLEGED RACIST, OR HOMOSEXUAL OR PUPPET COLORED ASSISTANT STATES
ATTORNEYS WILL GO ALONG AND CONTINUOUSLY VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF
RESPONDENTS BY ENFORCING VOID ORDERS CAUSING HER REMOVED FROM ANOTHER STATE &
RULE TO SHOW CAUSE IF THE ORDER OF PROTECTION AGAINST SHEMICA TAYLOR IS NOT
VACATED IN 48 HOURS SEEKING REMANDS INSTANTER WITH BODY ATTACHMENT ON ALL
PARTIES FOR THEIR ROLES IN SAID CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE INVOKING THE STATE POLICE,
STATE MARSHALL’S, SHERIFF POLICE AND FBI INVOKE JURISDICTION BY INVESTIGATING
THE ALLEGATIONS IGNORED BY ALL RESPONSIBLE PARTIES WHERE A (STATE OF ILLINOIS AFFIDAVIT PROPERLY NOTARIZED
ATTESTING TO THIS VERACITY) ASA YOLANDA SIMMONS VIOLATED THE ETHICS OF RPC 3.3
CORROBORATOING HER INVOLVEMENT COLLUDING WITH JUDGE FORTI IN SYSTEMIC CIVIL
RIGHTS VIOLATIONS VERIFYING SAID JUDGES ARE “PRIVATE CITIZENS” “TRESPASSING
UPON THE LAWS” LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES V RAIMONDO, 603 U,S. 369 (2024) TO SECTION 42 USC 1983 OF THE CIVIL
RIGHTS STATUTE, The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges assigned had no legal
authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They
acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act
when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an
order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the
law, and are engaged in treason.
& DIRECT THIS MATTER BE TRANSFERRED
TO THE THIRD MUNICIPAL DISTRICT- ROLLING MEADOWS COURT WHO HAS STATED THEY WILL
ACCEPT THIS PATERNITY MATTER AND INFORM THE JUDGE
Courtesy Copy V MOTION TO VACATE IMPROPER DISMISSAL (MAY 12,
2025) (POST RECUSAL TESTIMONY) VOID ORDER AND REQUEST FOR RE NOTICE OF RECUSING
THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PURSUANT TO
THE CASE OF 2 EX-COOK COUNTY ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY’S (NICHOLAS TRUTENKO,
ANDREW HORVAT) DUE TO FORMER ASSISTANT’S STATES ATTORNEY IRIS Y. CHIVIRA
ALLEGEDLY TOOK PART IN THE FALSIFICATION OF BACKDATING RECORDS ET AL. JUDGE
FORTI HAVING A HEARING MAY 9, 2025 ON THE 11:00AM CALL, STATED “you know what,
Sir I’m going to recuse myself like others but I’m going to apprise Judge
Scannicchio” et al.
Yahoo/Sent
Joe Louis
From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
To:CCC
DomRelCR3008 (Chief Judge's Office),CCC DomRelCR3006 (Chief Judge's Office),CCC
DomRelCRCL12 (Chief Judge's Office),Alexandrina Shrove,Cook County States
Attorneyand 79 more...
Cc:35th
Ward Community Service Office,Ward11,WARD15,Ward19,Ombudsman Washingtonand 46
more...
Tue, May 27 at 8:10 AM
In the Matter of Francoise Hightower v Joe Louis Lawrence
88
D 079012
Hearing June 9, 2025, at 10:00 am:
1.)
Dear FBI and all
Members of Law Enforcement as Democratic Judges and Clerks in Cook County and
State Agencies who have ADMITTED to taking part in every aspect that this
Respondent has eloquently particularized in all of his AFFIDAVITS.
A-
That because of the Terrorist
Racist control certain Caucasians and most Gay or Lesbian parties not one of
them will ever speak up or denounce any of the egregious Civil Rights
Violations Particularized in the aforementioned Pleadings in fact allegedly
most Black Men with wives pretending to be Heterosexual will get on their knees
or bend over and do whatever they are told.
2.)
Judge Forti served as Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel with
the City of Chicago, 1994 -1997, was Promoted to Deputy Corporation Counsel,
1998-2012. He presided over 1993 L
010772 Lawrence v CTA et al.
B-
Irish Judge Patrick McGann with venomous hatred and animosity at
the Plaintiff for filing a Civil Suit against the CTA, Kent Stephen Ray the
attorney for the CTA could not handle the Plaintiff Joe Louis with a judge in
his back pocket and Asst Chief Corporation Counsel Michael Forti.
C-
Judge McGann DENIED every Default, Motion accompanied with an
Affidavit, Plaintiff filed before the courts, but unlawfully Granted anything
the City attorney requested, due to her skin color.
D-
That Michael Forti as Chief Assistant Counsel behind his
boss at the time was Susan B. Scher would file an Appearance and Motion
7/15/1994, a Chief Corporation Counsel against a non-law licensed Pro se
litigant seeking justice and reinstatement back to work.
E-
Hereto attached, Oct. 30, 2011 Letter to Chairman Valerie
Jarrett seeking assistance being reinstated back to the Chicago Transit
Authority.
F-
Hereto attached, September 19, 2018, Motion to Reinstate Case
Due to Democratic Judges/Attorneys Trespassing Upon the Laws Committing Treason
Acting As Private Citizens Making the District Court Order “Void” A “Nullity”
(case 93 CV 01609).
G-
Hereto attached, Court Transcript of Proceedings- Motion For
Summary Judgment, ( July 26, 2019) 9:30 am. Page 9 Line 1 Judge
Norgle: You weren’t terminated? Line 2 Mr. Lawrence: I was
never terminated. Line 3 Judge Norgle: Do you still work there?
Line 4 Mr. Lawrence: No, Your Honor. I have documents to show that I
was never terminated. Et al.
H-
Hereto attached, Letter to President Dorval R. Carter, Jr.
September 28, 2019.
I-
Retirement Plan For CTA Employees, July 21, 2022, How CTA
destroyed information when he was hired and the original hiring date in March
1987.
3.)
Before taking the bench seat, Forti worked as the Chief Counsel
and Ethics Officer for the Illinois Department of Transportation from 2012 to
2015.
4.)
Kent Stephen Ray was in an alleged Homosexual intimate
relationship with the Secretary of the ATU Local 241 union who was the Chief
Attorney with the CTA and was responsible for destroying my personnel records
where, I filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against the CTA for Retaliatory
Discharge case # 93 L 010772.
A-That Par F are the actual
Pleadings Particularized demonstrating horrific Disparate Conditions of
Employment, Racism, Terrorism and most importantly how Blacks are used to
destroy their own ethnic groups upholding Jim Crow Laws protecting their
Political Masters in the Democratic Machine..
5.)
Susan Scher a Corporation Counsel dispatched on the case under
your alleged authority to help the alleged corrupt Homosexual CTA Attorney Ken
S. Ray, where he informed the racist Judge Patrick McGann, that, I had no
proof, I was DISCHARGED from the CTA and at the time, he was correct it was
hearsay, that caused the filing of the Complaint.
6.)
So, Judge Forti this is why you never read anything about me or
this case because you are well familiar to my pleadings and is trying to use
your racist and Homosexual connections to allegedly save maybe your ex or
former alleged Boo Kent Stephen Ray because only your kind of people or Black
and white trash would be intertwined in this type of mess.
7.)
Because of your Hate and resentment to Black love or those who
represent family love is why you ordered the removal of female minor from her
mother on a Bogus Court order signed from Judge Haracz, in that Ken S. Ray had
certain CTA employees to lie to the pharmacist and say, I was discharged to
prevent the benefits department from
paying for my baby daughter's medication for her ear infection because, I
didn't falsify how my work -related injury was sustained so as to receive a
medical card to pay for the medical expenses all of which you were aware of.
A-
Hereto attached, May 9,
2025, Order On Rule To Show Cause, Respondent Shemica Taylor has not been
legally under the jurisdiction of the court ever since Judge Haracz signed an
UNLAWFUL ALLOCATION ORDER, Nov 4, 2021, this is how certain judges and law firms
or attorneys allegedly make money off the injustices of helpless mothers of
Color or Masculine Heterosexual Men.
8.)
To think Ken stood before Judge McGann and told him, I think
that there is some type of grand conspiracy against me (with his hands
gesturing in a flaming flamboyant manner like a Rupal on a runway) Judge McGann
lost his mind called me garbage asked me who the Hell do I think, I am suing
the CTA? I snapped back at the judge, and I objected vehemently and told him he
was being bias and favoring counsel without listening to the facts, he got up
and tried to come off the bench a big African American Deputy stood up and the
judge couldn't get past him, Patrick McGann was reassigned to the Traffick
Division not long after that encounter.
9.)
Even after filing a Motion to Disqualify Judge McGann, a Judge
told me everything, I recorded in my pleadings were in fact true, but up here
we do things differently, I am not supposed to make these type of allegations
against white men, I was to have a sponsor or union representative speaking on
my behalf and directed me to return back to the Union and have them to file a
Grievience and leave this suit alone.
A-
That the Respondent
complied with the judge’s directive and never returned back to court in the Law
Division.
10.)
I complied with the judges' directives and was advised by CTA
Officials not to let any of the Black union officers to file my grievance, so I
had a Caucasian Richard Stomper to file the paperwork Dec 1, 1994, Judge Forti,
Ken S. Ray and members of the States Attorneys along with Judge Boyd (who was
my attorney and divorce judge pretended, he didn't know me refused to grant me
a Default knowing the mental state of my ex-wife at the time, allowed a
Detective/Attorney whom he repeatedly went into chambers with on our court call
and came out zipping his pants up with a big Ass Kool Aid smile on his face)
and granted that Detective everything he asked in motions.
11.)
Judge Forti and his army of closet Terrorist Homosexuals and
Racists Fraternal members Gas lighted and Induced Reliance on the entire court
and State Agencies engaging in diabolical Civil Rights Crimes.
12.)
BECAUSE OF MY MASCULINE HETEROSEXUAL DISPOSITION AND COLORED
SKIN----JUDGE FORTI IS LEADING THE CHARGE DEMONSTRATING HOW HIS KIND RESENTS
PEOPLE OF COLOR, HETEROSEXUALS AND THE EXTENT HIS PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO GO
COVERING UP THE CRIMES THEY VICIOUSLY PERPETRATED ON THOSE OUTSIDE THEIR
LIKENESS OR FRATERNAL ORDER.
13.)
Judge Forti want the FBI and law enforcement to know, he will
continue his unlawful terrorists' acts of denying or dismissing or separating
children from their moms or using his unlawful authority covering up sordid
crimes because as a Racist openly Gay Judge nothing is going to happen to him
on the allegations or criminal civil rights violations on Black or Brown
people.
A-
That Judge Forti and Kent
Stephen Ray had legal orgasms destroying mothers or any Masculine Man standing
up to their tyranny because most have been “Buck Broken” and said “Private
Citizens” were willing to commit careercide trying to Break the
Heterosexual Masculine Respondent by calling on everyone who shares their
racial hate in continuing this egregious chain conspiracy.
14.)
He wants everyone to see and know even though they have titles
or a Black Mayor they are beneath him and still inferior in that he can do
whatever he wants like he and his kind has done for so many years and Black
kept their mouths shut; after all, look at Yolanda Simmons she is the Assistant
States Attorney and is aware of all of the crimes, she is being very obedient
keeping her mouth shut because she knows her place.
15.)
Update on how Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower
was able to Induce Reliance on the entire judiciary using the States Attorney
to represent her all of these years, it has been alleged she was dating a
Caucasian judge not very tall, he may not be presiding on the bench right now.
16.)
As I digress in Oct or Nov of 1992, a female deputy approached
me who was Caucasian told me she didn't know how, I knew about Francoise but
she was advising me to stay away from that woman, she said they are plotting to
have me sent to prison by claiming, I molested her daughter, so if the girl
claims to want to see or be with you it is a set up, they have doctors already
on board who are going to say you abused her that's a child, she is only going
to do what she is told, but to stay away from that little girl.
17.)
A lot of Sheriff's knew about me and what, I was going through
reminded me that the Sheriff's had more guns and jurisdiction than the Chicago
Police so if a war was to jump off with her, they were ready.
18.)
When the Sheriff went to serve her at the Police Station certain
Police Officers tried to intimidate the Sheriffs trying to do their jobs so it
got bad where the Watch Commander had to communicate during Roll Call at the
Police Station, that no Police Officers are to interfere or obstruct the
service of the Cook County Sheriffs in any capacity effecting service on any
officer in the station.
19.)
The Cook County served anybody and everybody, I legally named
including the Supreme Court of Illinois judges nobody was off limits, Mayor
Rahm Emmanuel was served.
20.)
So many of them tried their damnest helping me clear my name
including some Police Officers who hated Francoise but between her allegedly
sleeping with a judge and certain Watch Commanders and Kent Stephen Ray
allegedly sleeping with the judges and Black Union members it was kind of
impossible winning any case in court.
21.)
For a long time, that statement the female Deputy shared with me
stayed in my brains, but she was definitely on point because on FEBRUARY 24,
1993, A COURT CONTINUANCE WAS HAD ON A RETURN OF SERVICE N. S. ORDER OF
PROTECTION.
22.)
Go to the database before it is DELETED, Francoise was working
with Kent Stephen Ray and Judge Ronald Bartkowicz where judge Bartkowicz was
screaming, he didn't sign up for having me murdered or having anything to
happen to me, Deputies were immediately dispatched to protect me on the day I
was Remanded by Bartkowicz a female Deputy cried profusely, she was aware what
was being attempted but a Lieutenant assured her and me, (I shook like a leaf,
I couldn't stand or sit, I was that scared for my life) Big Deputies took me
home 5950 North Kenmore, after my Auntie Betty Bell paid my bond and came back
and picked me up never in hand cuffs.
23.)
But a man was HUNG in prison on the day Bartkowicz tried to have
me sent to Cook County.
24.)
The question is how many other bodies have been mysteriously
slain involving Francoise or judges connected to Extortion Corruption in Child
Support cases?
25.)
See what many don't realize is that nobody was ever supposed to
know that the STATES ATTORNEY WAS INVOLVED because they are involved illegally
it was explained to me, they ORDERED her to leave me the FUCK ALONG, but she is
the alleged Queen of some type of underground corruption outfit and is flexing
her muscle exploiting everybody in the Criminal Enterprise not listening to
anybody.
26.)
That it was said by the Clerk on the 8th floor, that it would
take about 10 days before a judge approves my IFP Application so that, I can
file my Motions in the Clerk's Office.
The FBI wanted
corroboration, which is a key word, thanks to Francoise's Demonic Obsession in
coming after me for leaving her she has demonstrated how certain members of the
Cook County Criminal Enterprise use Black Judges in stealing senior citizens
homes in ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES (2008 ch 33616).
Judges can get any person
in the medical field to falsify any document to depict a sane person mentally
ill or take a child illegally from a mother and give to a sociopath father who
is on the Police force.
Look at what so many
Democratic judges did to me.
SO THAT EVERYONE IS CLEAR
IN THE JUDICIARY THE $50 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAULT ENCOMPASSES 2 CASES AND IS
LEGALLY NAMED IN THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ALL AFFIDAVITS
1.) $25 MILLION DOLLARS
FOR THE 88 D 079012 WITH CONDITIONS TO AMEND ADDITIONAL PARTIES AND PUNITIVE
DAMAGES.
2.) $25 MILLION DOLLARS
FOR THE JOHNSON SISTERS IN THE ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE 2008 CH 33616, THEY HAVE
BEEN EVICTED AND THEIR HOME FUCKING TRASHED BEFORE THEY HAD TO DEPLETE THEIR
PENSIONS AND SAVINGS MOVING OUT OF THEIR HOME OF 64 YEARS.
3.) I HAVE BEEN
DOING APPEALS FOR 36 YEARS AND IS CONSIDERED AN APPEALS SPECIALIST BY
INTELLECTS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND JUDICIARY, my experience came from the likes
of JILL K. MC NULTY, FRANCES LORENZ, JOSEPH GORDON it was one more in 1989, I
tried appealing the 88 D 079012 case but the May 18, 1988, court order kept
being removed from the 8th floor, when a white man who is uneducated is losing
a case, they have the records deleted or removed from the court filed or
database.
So, a technique has been
developed in my pleadings getting pass those obstructions, I thank God and the
members of Law Enforcement who believed in my legal abilities and not at my
skin Color as a barrier.
Respectfully submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Part
II
1.)
That
On Dec 4, 2023, 2023, Respondent filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and
Default Judgment of $50 million dollars, February 9, 2024 properly served on
all parties pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 11 and local rules
2.)
That Petitioner being represented by the States
Attorney nor herself failed to file a response or objection. Under Illinois
Supreme Court Rule 191 and Rule 56, the factual allegations and statements in
support of summary judgment were deemed admitted.
3.)
That Judge Michael Forti, presiding over this matter,
subsequently recused himself on May 9,
2025 via Hearing where an affidavit was filed May 12, 2025 in the Clerk of Cook
County verified said admissions.
4.)
That despite
having recused himself, Judge Forti entered an order
back dating to May 9, 2025 but entered May 12, 2025 and emailed to Respondent
May 13, 2025 at 5:05am dismissing the Petitioner’s Motion, referring to it
incorrectly as a “Petition,” and stating that the case is “off call.”
5.)
That it is well-settled law in Illinois that a judge
who has recused themselves may no longer take judicial
action in a matter. Any such action is beyond their authority
and is void ab initio. See In
re Marriage of Petersen, 319 Ill. App. 3d 325, 327 (1st Dist.
2001) (“A void order may be attacked at any time.”).
6.)
The judge’s action deprived said Respondent of due process and constitutes a violation of
judicial ethics under Canon 2, Rule 2.11 of the
Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct.
7.)
That Page 5, Par 13 of the Summary Judgment is an
admission demonstrating Blacks, Negros, Colored etc. have no authority over
Anglo Saxon judges within the judiciary, most importantly to further amplify
said veracity the Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Evans whom Judge Forti is
subordinate to and laws of the Appellate Court and Supreme Court rules
have vexatiously with “Damnosis” Contempt
issued rulings of Bias, Hatred and in a Terrorist manner which is systematic to
all Civil Rights Violations, by unlawfully Dismissing a legal Default trying to
“FIX” said case in an attempt to save his kind of people caught up in
this matter.
8.)
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a
cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement
of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of
inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons
V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d
354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller
457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court
has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
That
Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886
8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. here are
other cases of Fraud
9.)
US Bank et al vs Monzella
Johnson et al. 2008 CH 33616 case vacated HOW A CERTIFIED COURT ORDER (OCT. 29, 2024) OF JUDGE PAMELA
GILLESPIE VACATING FORECLOSURE JUNE 10, 2010, AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE
COURT 5TH DIVISION DEC. 30, 2011, whereby, attorneys emailed
Judge Derico with instructions on how to construct a court order so as to
unlawfully evict senior citizens from their home of 64 years before
Thanksgiving 2024, Black or certain Latino judges are only appointed to the
bench or state agencies to fulfill the doctrines of hate and racial oppression
on their own ethnic groups no other group.
10.)
In Re M. G.W Case #2020 D 79452 a case very similar to the 88 D 079012 is
fraught with fraud and corruption where former judge David Haracz signed an
Allocation Order refusing a trial and signed the court order (November 4, 2021)
without any of the parties or their attorneys and Judge Forti is using that
fraudulent document to remove the child from the mother unlawfully, furthermore
demonstrating his untouchable status as a homosexual terrorizing a Black woman
because nobody Black or of competent authority can admonish him, said orders are
a Nullity/Void and needs to be vacated instanter.
A-
Fraudulent Allocation
Court Order hereto attached, Ex A, How an Allocation should be presented Page
13 AGREED ALLOCATION OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND PARENTING PLAN Ex B
B-
Allocation Order
violated Illinois: 750 ILCS 5/602.10 (Parenting Plan),
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 924
C- Drafting the Allocation
Judgment
Typically,
one attorney (often the petitioner’s) drafts the proposed judgment.
D-
Review and Agreement
Signature and Filing
E-
Once finalized:
a.
Both parties sign the judgment (or
their attorneys if permitted).
b.
Attorneys sign to indicate approval
as to form and substance.
F-
The final
version is filed with the clerk of the court.
11.)
Respondent has
exhausted over $50,000 for legal representation, not one motion was ever
adjudicated hereto attached Partial Responses to Complaint to the ARDC #2023
IN02076
A- The Attorney for the A.R.D.C. Michael Rusch
in his Oct 2, 2023 reply Page 2 Par 1, Lines 2-4 Based on
conversations with you, Beerman Law requested a full trial before the judge.
The court denied that request et al.
B- That Par 2, Line 3-5 “Regarding Beermann Law, you stated that
Beermann Law failed to challenge the judge, demand a fair trial, or appeal the
judge’s decision et al. further demonstrating the following:
A-
Public
Corruption
B-
Abuse
of Authority under color of law (18 U. S. C. 242)
C-
Bribery
or honest services fraud (18 U.S.C. 1341, 1346, 666)
D-
Civil
Rights violations
12.)
That because of the Unlawful Court Order Void in its entirety in
reference to Par 11 A, Judge Forti has Induced Reliance on an INNOCENT
RESPONDENT, predicated from a plethora of fraudulent court orders causing harm
to her by illegally signing a COURT ORDER MAY 8, 2025 FOR AN INTERIM ORDER OF
PROTECTION ET AL. THE COURT HEREBY FINDS A. SHEMICA HAS ABSCONDED, CONCEALED
AND KIDNAPPED THE MINOR CHILD et al. “RIDICULOUS
SLANDER OF A JUDGE”
13.)
That a Rule to Show Cause for SHEMICA’S failure to pay CHILD
REPRESENTATIVE FEES ET AL.
14.)
That #5 of the order states, “This matter is set for return on
the Order of Protection for November 12, 2025 et al”. “LITIGIOUSLY
PROLONGED SO MANY CAN PROFIT”
15.)
That Judge Forti further violated 18 U.S.C. 242 by
authorizing the COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS TO SERVE THESE UNLAWFUL DOCUMENTS DUE TO
HIS WRECKLESS DISREGARD FOR ANY LAWS.
16.)
JUDGE FORTI SIGNED A COURT ORDER MAY 9, 2025, ON A RULE TO SHOW
CAUSE: COURT FINDS A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF INDIRECT CIVIL CONTEMPT….FOR FAILURE
TO PAY THE CHILD REPRESENTATIVE’S RETAINER, CONTINUED TO AUG 25, 2025.
17.)
That on Monday May 19, 2025, Respondent’s daughter was removed
from her custody in the State of Indiana where she fled for her safety and
has NEVER BEEN UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF COOK COUNTY ONCE JUDGE DAVID E. HARACZ
SIGNED THE VOID COURT ORDER OF NOV. 4, 2021.
18.)
That an email reply (May 19, 2025) from a
retired attorney further articulating the corruption in Cook County Courts
ignored, hereto attached, Ex 3 Page 2, Par 2 How does an ordinary citizen in Illinois
obtain Justice? ---The answer is simple, he/she just does not.
A- To
further amplify the veracity of the aforementioned claim Judge Forti and other
racist judges have used racial hate, Terrorism “Lynching tactics covering up
sordid Civil Rights Violations (40 years) on a Paternity case knowing
Respondent was framed and not only wasn’t his child but forcing him to pay for
an incest matter of a biological Police officer impregnating his daughters, but
because of his skin color and being a Heterosexual, they want the FBI and
everyone to know that they can Criminalize any innocent person to achieve their
satisfaction.
B- That
as if the aforementioned isn’t enough to make the average person puke trying to
ascertain these demonic acts, Respondent Shemica Taylor a mother with no
criminal record, no DCFS record of any sort and due to the alleged
Homosexual/Bisexual and racial hatred of her being a loving Heterosexual mother
has been criminalized and defamed entirely claiming she kidnapped her own
biological child. “sic” “CASE PROLONGED NOW 5 YEARS”
19.)
The
message is clear to all RESPECTABLE MEN OR WOMEN regardless to your skin color,
YOUR MOTHER, AUNT OR DAUGHTERS, GRANDMOTHERS ETC CAN BE RAPED ABUSED, EVICTED
UNLAWFULLY OR GUARDIANS OF COOK COUNTY and be robbed and get a judge like
Forti, Romanek, Derico etc. and the crimes of all perpetrators will be
egregiously covered-up demonstrating no justice can ever be had in any COOK
COUNTY COURTS.
MEMORANDUM
FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES #14219
SUBJECT:
DIRECTING THE REPEAL OF UNLAWFUL REGULATIONS
Promoting economic growth and American
innovation are top priorities of this Administration. Unlawful,
unnecessary, and onerous regulations impede these objectives and impose massive
costs on American consumers and American businesses. In recent years, the
Supreme Court has issued a series of decisions that recognize appropriate
constitutional boundaries on the power of unelected bureaucrats and that
restore checks on unlawful agency actions. Yet, despite these critical
course corrections, unlawful regulations — often promulgated in reliance on
now-superseded Supreme Court decisions — remain on the books.
Consistent with these priorities and with
my commitment to restore fidelity to the Constitution, on February 19, 2025,
I issued Executive Order 14219 (Ensuring Lawful Governance and
Implementing the President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Deregulatory
Initiative). It directed the heads of all
executive departments and agencies to identify certain categories of unlawful
and potentially unlawful regulations within 60 days and begin plans to repeal
them. This review-and-repeal effort shall prioritize evaluating each
existing regulation’s lawfulness under the following United States Supreme
Court decisions:
A-
State Agencies and Judges have demonstrated
anarchy and chaos in the courts needing Federal intervention because this is a
40 year (“Fixed Incest Paternity case) old case and judges and state agencies
have demonstrated how they are able to violate and circumvent the laws of the
US Constitution and still enforce Jim Crow Laws outlawed by the US Supreme
Court.
20.)
THAT COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT HONOR OR ABIDE BY ANY LAWS OF THE
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
A- Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable
court rules and procedures”
B-
The Seventh Circuit
Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court
of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
21.)
That because Judge Forti did not enter a court order into the
record from the May 9, 2025, 9:00am Hearing, said State of Illinois
Affidavit is being filed, Particularizing all events that transpired in
that court corroborating “Fraud” and “Corruption”
22.)
That years ago a Judge of Jewish ethnicity and of impeccable
integrity advised me to always obtain a court order from a judge anytime you
appear before him and an Irish Judge Patrick McGann told me to never appear in
any court on Hearsay information.
A-
Case 88 D 079012 Aug 3, 1988 vacating wrong date of
defective service of Feb 24, not Feb 23, 1988 caused the May 18, 1988 DEFAULT
to stand never ordering child support, causing all court orders afterwards to
be deemed Void/a Nullity.
B-
Respondent served Courtesy Copy IV via email April 28, 2025,
to Judge Forti and members of the Judiciary as well as the Judicial Council of
the Seventh Circuit, particularizing the racist hateful terrorist criminal acts
of him and all of his kind has participated in and are guilty of.
C-
Because of Respondents skin color and not being intimidated or
bullied by him or the state Judge Forti has recused himself from the matter
when he never was supposed to be on the case in the first place entering any
court orders.
A-
Forti used City Hall, the States Attorney and State Agencies other judges to
help Ken S. Ray, Asst States Atty as they committed Perjury aided and abetted
with Francoise Hightower trying to help her EXTORT money from him
illegally for child support of a child he was never the father and prevent his
Reinstatement back to the CTA due to criminal conspiracies.
1.)
The Summary Judgment was filed Dec 4, 2023
and was ignored and thereby admitted too in its entirety Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary
must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party
contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a
judgment as a matter of law."
This statement of
material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific
references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting
materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing
summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of
material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each
numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of
any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the
record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very
clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the
moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of
the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
2.)
That
the Default was filed Feb. 9, 2024 and methodically particularized all
documents filed with affidavits and never denied or objected to but the judges
mistook him as being a pushover simply because of their alleged skin color or
alleged homosexual fraternal liaisons.
In the matter of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7th Cir. 2013) ) The Court,
nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for
Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on
their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment
motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.
23.) The following events are transcribed from the Dec 13, 2024 where
ASA Yolanda never provided a court order
24.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: So I am. I’m respectfully objecting to the state
being involved because judged when Eileen Burke was a judge, she was involved
in this matter and denied..
25.)
Judge Forti: And at the moment, Sir, Sir, this is falling. I’m
telling you that you have filed a motion against a variety of parties,
including the assistant state’s attorney. You got him. You filed a motion for
default. Isn’t that, right?
26.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: That is correct. And I also filed a motion to go to a
different venue
27.)
Judge Forti: I am letting him Miss Simmons know that you filed this motion
for default. And I want to know what Miss Simmons’s position is now.
28.)
ASA: At this time, I have received some emails on this
case. From Scannicchio Clerk as well as from our own internal policies on how
we handle with these cases. Your honor. I’m going to have to set this for brief
continuance and get more clarification from my supervised attorney about how we
handle these types of cases given the nature of what Mr. Lawrence has filed. So
what date?
29.)
Judge Forti: So what day?
30.)
ASA: I want to say this for January 30th. I’m sorry.
January 3rd.
31.)
Judge Forti: is that work, Mr. Lawrence?
32.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: It’s fine.
33.)
ASA: Can you come back here at noon?
34.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: Back to zoom?
35.)
ASA: Yes.
36.)
Joe Yes
37.)
Judge Forti: And the issue is where it where you’re get your getting Miss
Simmons is seeking the continuance with respect to the fact that you re noticed
your motion for default
38.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: And for the Cook County Judiciary to
be recused as well.
39.)
Judge Forti: That I cannot do.
40.)
Joe Louis Lawrence: And we still have Maritza Martinez motion that have not been
addressed that I paid to $75 for
41.)
Judge Forti: You need to go back to Miss Judge Martinez I can only
handle because I have not recused myself and your effort to get me recused by
virtue of the SOJ was denied. So I am. Keeping this case until at least we see
what Miss Simmons says on the motion for default anything relating to Judge
Romanek or Judge Martinez you have to raise in those courtrooms all right. So
Miss Simmons, what do you have Mr. Lawrence’s contact information?
42.) That ASA Yolanda Simmons never presented any documents
impeaching the veracity of any Respondents pleadings but made irrelevant
statements in the court and violated the sections of the Illinois Rules of
Professional Conduct, RPC 3.3…
. Enforcement of a Void Judgment
The
May 8, 1996, court order, which has been used to enforce child support
obligations against me and, is void ab initio due to the existence of an
unvacated prior order dated May 18, 1988. The enforcement of a void judgment
violates due process rights, that the original order (1988) superseded everything
else.
- “A void judgment is one which,
from its inception, is a complete nullity and without legal effect.”
— People v. Wade, 116 Ill. 2d 1, 506 N.E.2d 954 (1987)
- “A judgment is void if it
violated due process.”
— Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938)
2. Falsification of Court Records
There
is evidence suggesting that Assistant State’s Attorneys and others, along with
CTA General Attorney, participated in altering official records to misrepresent
Tycee’s age, thereby falsely establishing minor status to justify child support
enforcement, The
State’s Attorney and others are accused of backdating or altering a birthdate
to make someone a minor again, likely to continue child support obligations
past their lawful limit are egregious within the laws itself and demonstrates
serious criminal allegations being covered up.
- “Fraud upon the court… vitiates
the entire proceeding.”
— People v. Sterling, 357 Ill. 354, 192 N.E. 229 (1934)
- “Fraud upon the court is fraud
which is directed to the judicial machinery itself.”
— Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985)
Such
actions, not only undermine the judicial process but may also constitute
criminal offenses under:
- 720 ILCS 5/17-3 – Forgery
- 720 ILCS 5/33-3 – Official
Misconduct
3.
Unlawful Arrest and Retaliation
In
1994, a former CTA attorney in the workman’s compensation division Judge
(Ronald Bartkowicz) issued a warrant leading to my arrest and the removal of my
CTA badge while I was handcuffed. This action appears to have been retaliatory,
stemming from my prior complaints against systemic racism and injustice at the
CTA for not receiving any workman’s compensation while off work injured on duty
( a drunk police officer totaled his van on my rear bumper while standing still
at a CTA bus stop). Lockwood Chicago.
Police
Officer levied a false allegation complaint where an Order of Protection was
never served on me and had no knowledge of but was arrested and Remanded into
custody.
- “A person has a constitutional
right to be free from arrest unless probable cause exists.”
— Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964)
- “Retaliation for the exercise
of constitutional rights is actionable under § 1983.”
— Mt. Healthy City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S.
274 (1977)
If
the arrest was indeed retaliatory, it constitutes a violation of my First and
Fourth Amendment rights.
4.
Denial of Due Process
The
persistent handling of my case by certain judges, despite evident conflicts of
interest and potential biases, raises concerns about forum shopping and denial
of a fair trial. The
case is kept in front of certain judges to ensure a predetermined outcome due
to racial bias or corruption
- “A fair trial in a fair
tribunal is a basic requirement of due process.”
— In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133 (1955)
- “Due process of law requires
that a party be accorded procedural fairness, i.e., given notice and an
opportunity to be heard.”
— Fiallo v. Lee, No. 1-04-0440 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005)
5.
Improper Enforcement and Financial Extortion
The
enforcement of the 1996 order, despite its void status, has led to unauthorized
wage garnishments and financial penalties, effectively amounting to extortion
under the guise of legal authority.
- “The knowing use of a void
judgment as a basis for legal enforcement can constitute fraud.”
— People ex rel. Brzica v. Village of Lake Barrington, 268 Ill.
App. 3d 420 (1994)
Such
actions may also violate federal statutes, including:
- 18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Frauds and
Swindles
- 18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation
of Rights Under Color of Law
6.
Federal Implications and Need for Oversight
Given
the involvement of public officials and potential systemic misconduct, this
matter may fall under the purview of federal oversight agencies, including the
FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice.
Based
on the aforementioned, My Prayer for Relief respectfully requests:
- Immediate suspension of all
enforcement actions related to the May 8, 1996, order.
- Transfer My Summary Judgment,
Default Judgment & Motion to Recuse the Entire Cook County Judiciary
and Appoint a Special Prosecutor et al. to Rolling Meadows Municipal
District venue free of Bias.
- Comprehensive investigation
into the alleged misconduct by the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board and
other appropriate bodies who have ignored all my complaints
- Referral of this matter to
federal authorities for potential civil rights violations.
- Vacate all Court Orders that
Judge Forti unlawfully signed having Respondent Shemica Taylor’s kidnapped
daughter RETURNED BACK INTO HER CUSTODY INSTANTER.
Given
the involvement of public officials and potential systemic misconduct, this
matter may fall under the purview of federal oversight agencies, including the
FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice.
In addition to the above, My Prayer for
Relief respectfully requests:
- Immediate suspension of all
enforcement actions related to the May 8, 1996, order.
- Comprehensive investigation
into the alleged misconduct by the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board and
other appropriate bodies not addressing any of the issues.
- Referral of this matter to
federal authorities for potential civil rights violations.
- Rule to Show Cause against all
parties complicit in the Criminal Enterprise of Cook County with a Body
Attachment Instanter.
- Vacating all Court Orders in Re
Shemica Taylor who have not seen or spoke to her daughter ever since she
was kidnapped via Judge Forti’s
unlawful Order of Protection et al.
The
actions described herein represent not only personal grievances but also
potential systemic failures within our judicial system. Upholding the rule of
law and ensuring justice requires that such allegations be thoroughly
investigated and addressed.
1.) The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged
the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney
was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation
Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in
Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133
(June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of
other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3
& 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges
who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted
judges.
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
43.) Pembaur
v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case
that clarified a previous case, Monell v.
Department of Social Services (1978), and
established that municipalities can be held liable even for a single decision
that is improperly made, State Agency colluded with a plethora of other
agencies violating the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 and Civil rights Act of 1866
and Mansell v Saunders (CA 5 F 1A)
372 F 2d.
Clerk
Coordinator Ebony:
8:55am: I need everyone good morning. Come on good morning, good morning, Emily
and good morning. Good morning, OK. I have a few announcements to make. The
first announcement is, if you are here for a state case or child support case,
where they told you to come on the call at 9:O5 your court call really starts
at 11:00 AM. So you can come back when the states attorneys are here at 11:00
AM to have your case heard. OK, so if you’re here on child support, any child
support expense related issue, or if the state’s attorney told you to come at
9O5 to check in, come. Back at 11:00 AM when the state’s attorney arrives to
have your case heard. But you guys are free to log off. Same information same
everything, Meeting ID password, just at 11:00 AM. Thank you all so much. Thank
you. No problem. Thank you. No problem. See you at 11. Thank you
ASA
Yolanda Simmons: Good
afternoon. This is assistant state attorney Yolanda Simmons. This is the child
support call for calendar 61. Judge Forti. I will call your name as I see it
listed on the screen. I will ask for a phone number to contact you at and I
will call you to have a conference with your case. Okay, alright. Umm, Mr.
Lawrence, please unmute yourself, Give me a number. I can reach you at.
31296565 31296564554 5
Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence:
Yep.
ASA
Yolanda Simmons: Alright.
Thank you.
Judge
Forti: Ebony are you
there?
Clerk
Coordinator Eboni:
Yes judge, I am here are you ready to go to the last breakout room?
Judge
Forti: Yes. And let
me just while I peer momentarily, folks, are you all here on Carrera?
Fernandez,
Judge
Forti: I’m finishing
up a prove up, and then I’ll be able to deal with you all. I see Mr. Wasco is
here. Are the other parties here on Fernandez?
Attorney
Bridget Obyrne: Good
morning, your honor. I’m here on behalf of Efrain. I’m waiting for a partner in
my firm. And then I think we are waiting for Peter Olson on behalf of the other
party.
Judge
Forti All right,
ebony, when everyone is here for the 12:00 o’clock if you could put them in
another breakout room, because I think Yolanda will still have the main room.
Ebony: OK, awesome. No problem.
Judge
forti: So you’re
putting me into number three? Well, as the court reporter, and I believe Miss
Lillian is free to go. Isn’t she? Don’t we need to? We don’t need her for
number three.
Ebony: No, I already explained to them.
No, I already explained to room 4 what they needed to do. So they’re good to
go.
Judge Forti: what’s next Yolanda?
ASA
Yolanda Simmons:
Alright, Thank you. OK, you have, we have Mr. Lawrence, your honor. This is
Lawrence versus Hightower. Now, this is a old case
Judge
Forti: Now we had
this case for many, many times.
ASA
Yolanda Simmons:
Yes. Now your honor, Mr. Lawrence’s initial pleading was on the state provided
case. He was trying to zero out the arrears. And that motion was ultimately
denied. And that resulted in Mr. Lawrence filing motions trying to have
yourself and other judges removed for prejudice and other issues. Your honor.
And that’s why I’m here today. So technically his motions are here before the
court currently before the court on non-State
issues, but they originated from a state case.
Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence: But
I think the….
Judge
Forti: Mr. Lawrence
you’ve got dates separate in a part from this. Your SOJ’s have not been looked
upon favorably. So I’m not sure what’s up to day. Miss Simmons, I don’t want to
hear anything other than a state matter today.
Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence: The
default, your honor, this is what this matter is about, your honor. A re notice
for the default and a re notice to recuse the entire Cook County Judiciary.
Judge
Forti and that , you
know what, Sir I’m going to recuse myself like others but I’m going to apprise
Judge Scannicchio of this, because you cannot recuse the entire. Domestic
relations division.
Respondent
Joe Louis Lawrence:
Your honor This is a 40-year-old case…..
Judge
Forti: That’s all
I’m saying at this point. Because I’m going to recuse myself and I don’t have
the time today to go into this. So this may be something, Mr. Lawrence that
ultimately, as I said, I’m going to bring it up with Judge Scannicchio, so Ms.
Simmons, this is off my call right now.
ASA
Yolanda Simmons: All
right will do your honor.
Judge
Forti Sorry, Mr.
Lawrence. What else is up?
Finished at
12:36pm
Certain
Judges in Cook County are preferring Zoom and Break out rooms to conceal their
corrupt activities “FIXING” cases in Cook County.
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never
Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency
of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if
not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first
time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E.
2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
This case was
originally over Sept. 17, 1987 by former States Attorney Richard J. Daley, the
only Irish person who followed the laws and respected the Respondent and his
Attorney Robert A. Egan but was illegally bought back without Respondents
knowledge and was Defaulted May 18, 1988 and never vacated, but this has been
admitted to via Summary Judgment and is being ignored as so many are trying to
continuously cover this matter up even after Defaulting.
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath
states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to
735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated
to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower
) Judge Patricia Fallon
Petitioner
)
) Cal 54
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent
) Room CL 12
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice of Motion to Recuse Judge
Fallon et al. to all parties recorded in said Notice via regular/electronic
delivery.
Hon Judicial Council of the Seventh
Circuit
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon Judge Patricia
Fallon CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Michael A. Forti
CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chavira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Abbey
Romanek CCC.DomRelCR3008@cookcountyil.gov
sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov Yolanda.simmons@cookcountysao.org
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eilene
O’Neil Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Susan Mendoza Amanda.prentice@illinoiscomptroller.gov
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave,
Chicago Ill. 60653
Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI,
Hon
Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in
Charge (FBI) City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
Illinois
Courts Commission
555 West
Monroe, 15th floor
Chicago Ill.
60661
info@IllinoisCourtsCommission.gov
Illinois Court
Commission Members
Justice P.
Scott Neville, Jr. Chairman
Justice Thomas
M. Harris
Justice
Margaret Stanton McBride
Judge Lewis
Nixon
Judge Sheldon
Sobol
Judge Aurora
Abella-Austriaco
Madam Paula
Wolf
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal pmal@potestivolaw.com
press@cookcountyil.gov bthompson@potestivolaw.com
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed
to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on June 10, 2025 .
________________________
Respectfully Submitted,
Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrenc
No comments:
Post a Comment