READ HOW RACIST COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE USING THEIR ROBES AND UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY TO VENT THEIR HATE AT ANY BLACK, BROWN MAN OR HETEROSEXUAL WOMAN WHO DARES TO CHALLENGE THEM OR THEIR RACIST AUTHORITY IN ANY COURT.
COOK COUNTY AND STATE JUDGES ARE USING THEIR UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL AUTHORITY TO UNLAWFULLY CIRCUMVENT THE LAWS AS A WEAPON TO HARRASS INFLICT EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND HARM BY UNLAWFULLY EVICTING SENIORS FROM THEIR HOMES OR IN THIS CASE COVER-UP A SOPHISTCATED EXTORTION OPERATION IN THE CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION.
JUDGES WHO ARE RACIST AND HOMOSEXUAL THE JUDICIAL INQUIRY BOARD WILL NOT ADMONISH ANY OF THE JUDGES --NO DEMOCRATIC JUDGE IN ILLINOIS HONORS THE 14TH AMENDMENT OR ANY ASPECT OF ANY CIVIL RIGHTS.
READ THE SHIT JUDGE MICHAEL FORTI & ABBEY ROMANEK ARE DOING ILLEGALLY WEARING ROBES!
STATE OF ILLINOIS AFFIDAVIT March 24, 2025
PARTICULARIZED EVENTS CAPSULIZING
JUDICIAL RACIAL HATE/CORRUPTION COVER-UP AND DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF MY SKIN
COLOR AND HETEROSEXUAL DISPOSITION ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY YOLANDA SIMMONS
NEVER PRESENTED A COURT ORDER ESTABLISHING JUDGE FORTI HAD THE CASE WRONGFULLY
DEC. 13, 2024 WHEN THE CASE WAS TO BE BEFORE JUDGE ROMANEK WHO REFUSED TO HAVE
THE RESPONDENT ON HER CALENDAR 94 FOR HIS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE ABBEY
ROMANEK (FILED NOV 4, 2024).
The Motion
to Disqualify Judge Romanek is file stamped differently it has no time recorded
on it like all of the other Motions and Courtesy Copies filed on the 8th
floor in the Domestic Division.
Pursuant to
Page 5, Line 92-94 ASA verbally continued the Default et al to Jan 3, 2025 at
noon but never presented a court order in spite of repeated emails sent 12/13/24,
2:26pm and 3/21/25, 10:44am.
Summary Judgment was filed
along with the Default as judges tried ignoring all Civil Rights Violations
perpetrated at the Respondent.
Dec 13, 2024, Calendar 61 before Judge Forti 11:00 am
1. Clerk: Mr. Lawrence, the
Judge told you to come back at 11, you are a little early.
2. Joe
Louis Lawrence: OK,
Alright.
3. ASA: What I would do I will ask you to unmute yourself and
I’ll call you all individually to
discuss your child support matter. But I do see I have someone in the county
lockup Mr. Lee. Can you please unmute yourself? Good morning, Sir how are you? I’m
OK,
4. ASA: Well, Mr. Lee, you were here ‘cause’ you have not
submitted to genetic testing. Have you been submitted to genetic testing there in
the detention center phone?
5. ASA: OK, so is there possible to get him to genetic testing
today?
6. Deputy: I have no idea. OK, so what I’ll do,
what are you in for? Sir? I didn’t know any other case. No. OK, so what I’ll
do, sir,
7. ASA: I’ll go ahead and release you on this case only, and I’ll
need you to go submit for the genetic testing. OK, and if you do not test, I’m
gonna issue another warrant. OK, so let me give you your next court date, and I
will write this on the order. I’m gonna send order over to you. OK, so now I’m
gonna give you an extra day. Your next court date will be January 3rd
at 11:00 AM. And you’ll be on zoom. Okay. Now go ahead with your question So
you’re gonna send me all that information. OK, we have to go, have to come. No,
she knows. So you’ll get the email, tell you when it comes back to the zoom, as
well as you get an order for your genetic testing, and you do that as soon as
possible. But you do it before the 3rd of next month. So you’re
gonna send me somewhere in particular, and you go down, you go to the Daley
center in the basement. That’s where you take it at. OK, just go along. I don’t
have to pay for it? No, I remember last time they told me I was gonna have to
pay. What do they call it? What they. Pay for this test. OK, the State pays for
this test, but you need to take it.
8. (Defendant Remanded at Cook County Jail)
Mr. Lee OK, I’m gonna take it Monday then. ASA: I’m gonna check
if you don’t take it. I’m gonna issue another warrant for your arrest. Alright.
Mr. Davidson, I’ll send this order over, probably within the next 45 minutes.
And thank you That’s the one I’m done. I’ll send the order to you. Thank you.
Thank you, ma’am. Have a good day. Thank you. You too Alright, ma’am, I’m ready
for you parties now.
9. States Attorney Yolanda Simmons: I’m gonna call your name, and I’ll be asking
yourselves to give me a number. Where I can reach you at, I have Mr. Lawrence.
Please unmute yourself.
10. ASA: OH yeah. Good morning. Yes, you have a state child
support case. Yes, ma’am. I have noticed. OK, give me a phone number.
11. ASA: I can reach you at 312 965-6455. OK, go ahead and mute
yourself. I’ll give you a call.
12. Joe Louis Lawrence: Excuse me, I spoke to Miss Simmons.
She said, I have to speak to judge Forti.
13. Clerk: This is about what’s supposed to go before the Judge,
right?
14. Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes.
15. Clerk: OK, yeah. See, it has to go back before that judge to ask
16. Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes, ma’am, OK Yeah,
17. Joe Louis Lawrence: Madam Clerk. Could you put me back
before Judge Forti please?
18. Clerk: Well, that has to be done before the Coordinator, So you
would just have to hold on a moment.
19. Joe Louis Lawrence: OK,
20. Clerk: thank you.
21. Clerk: Alright.
22. Clerk: so you have to go back before that judge to ask for a
change of venue or SOJ.
23. Joe Louis Lawrence: That is correct,
24. Clerk: So You have to go back to that judge. Which judge was it?
25. Joe Louis Lawrence: It was Judge Romanek
26. Clerk You have to go back before that judge. You have to file
your motion.
27. Joe Louis Lawrence But I did, I did all of that. The
clerks indicated that Romanek said send the case to Forti
28. Clerk No it can’t come to judge Forti just like that
29. Joe Louis Lawrence but that’s why I…
30. Clerk: So now listen to
me Sir, Listen to me. You have to go before that judge with your motion. You
say you went before Judge Romanek to ask, what did you ask for? Was it an SOJ
substitution of judge?
31. Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes, ma’am. Yes, ma’am.
32. Clerk: OK, so now listen to me. Listen to me. So Judge Romanek is
supposed to send that substitution of
judge to our presiding judge, which is Judge Scannicchio. It has to go
to the presiding judge and then they enter it into a lottery system to sort it
out to go to another judge. You just can’t say go to judge Forti. It was never
on Judge Forti’s call.
33. Joe Louis Lawrence: with all due the respect. Who am I
speaking to please?
34. Clerk Kimberly Wilson: My name is Kimberly Wilson. I am the
coordinator.
35. Joe Louis Lawrence: OK, OK everything you’re saying I’m
familiar. With but I can’t do nothing different if this is where they’re
sending me. I sent him a courtesy copy explaining what was said. So if I'm not
supposed to be in front of Judge Forti which I understand and know this, I just
need an order from Forti sending this matter to Scannicchio. I can’t make
nobody put me where I’m supposed to go, now I am going through Romper Room.
36. Clerk Kimberly Wilson: I see and I hear you, Judge Forti
can’t do an order Because it was never on his call. Judge Romanek is supposed
to do the order to send it to Judge Scannicchio. She knows this. She’s supposed
to do the order sending it to Judge Scannicchio. Pretty much judge Forti has
nothing to do with it. is what I am trying to tell you.
37. Joe Louis Lawrence: But I understand. But you see where…
38. Clerk Kimberly Wilson:
He can’t do an order because it’s not on his call and it was not before
him. It’s what I’m trying to say. So you have to go back before Judge Romanek
for her to do an order to transfer to substitute the judge. You want to change?
You want to substitute a judge? Is what you want.
39. Joe Louis Lawrence: When I did this, I originally
filed a motion to disqualify Judge
Forti. The case was sent to Romanek. Romanek did not follow the procedures. She
said that everything I was saying, I was wrong and I filed the proper motion to
recuse her November the 4th when the Clerks went to put me on her
calendar, she informed them that she did not want me on her calendar and said
to send this case to Judge Forti is the reason why I'm here.
40. Clerk Kimberly Wilson: Madam Clerk, Can you look this case up
for us and tell me what’s going on? For some reason I can’t get into the into
the odyssey to look this up.
41. Joe Louis Lawrence: I mean they are playing games with me
now. I wouldn’t be in front of him if I’m trying to recuse him. Yes,
42. Madam Clerk: Mr. Lawrence. Do you know your case
number? I don’t have your case number 88 DO79O12. Wait wait one moment, You
said 1988 D.
43. Joe Louis Lawrence Yes ma’am.
44. Madam Clerk: OK go ahead D 079012 If I could get in, cause our system is
acting up.
45. Clerk Kimberly Wilson:
I’m having a problem with the system. It won’t even let me sign on to
the system.
46. Madam Clerk:
I know it’s a mess today. Is it Hightower and Joseph Lawrence?
47. Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes Ma’am, OK,
this is not even my child.
48. Madam Clerk: Ok what are you trying to find out?
49. Clerk Kimberly Wilson: Basically He’s saying that, He’s
trying to do a substitution of judge before the proper judge. Romanek. And for
some reason, they told him he had to come to judge Forti. As far as we know,
he's not even saying it. It is on. It is assigned to his calendar, if that’s,
if that means anything.
50. Joe Louis Lawrence: Yes, It does
51. Madam Clerk: it is calendar 61. OK,
52. Clerk Kimberly Wilson:
OK, so, Mr. Lawrence, you were right. It is on calendar 61.
53. Clerk Kimberly Wilson: So Mr. Lawrence
54. Judge Forti:
So, Mr. Lawrence, you’re clogging
the system with all due respect here. Here’s the issue. Miss Simmons and I are
going to address your motion that you filed for default. That piece of the case
is on calendar 61. But the piece of the matter that deals with Judge Romanek is
not on my calendar. I just sent an email to Judge Scannicchio’s assistant to
confirm that, So only with respect to your motion for default, are we going to
deal with this today? And Miss Simmons, when you’re ready, I’d like to handle
the Lawrence matter.
55. Joe Louis Lawrence: Your Honor, I filed a motion to
disqualify you, so you shouldn’t be handling anything.
56. ASA Yolanda Simmons: Your Honor, I am ready
57. Judge Forti: Well, who heard that? as, I understand
it. And that’s why I’m asking if there was a motion to disqualify me. There
should be an order indicating whether or not that motion to disqualify was
granted or not. I’m not aware of it being granted.
58. Joe Louis Lawrence: That is the motion put before Judge
Romanek. That’s the issue right now.
59. Judge Forti: Well If she denied it, then it’s done.
And you’re back in front of me.
60. Joe Louis Lawrence: Judge Scannicchio Never sent the case
to you.
61. Judge Forti: No, that’s not true. Miss Simmons, all
right. Did you get a copy of Mr. Lawrence’s motion for default?
62. ASA Yolanda Simmons: Yes, I did. Now, this is just to
refresh myself, Mr. Lawrence. You’re trying to terminate arrearage because
you’re alleging the petitioner is deceased. Is that correct?
63. Joe Louis Lawrence: Excuse me!
64. ASA Yolanda Simmons:
Are you trying to terminate arrearage? Because you are alleging the
petitioner is deceased?
65. Joe Louis Lawrence: No, no. I filed the default from a
Summary Judgment.
66. ASA Yolanda Simmons:
OK, so I got something from Judge Scannicchio, because your case was
with Judge Scannicchio, correct?
67. Joe Louis Lawrence:
Not that I know of.
68. Judge Forti: It was on calendar one at interim
basis. Mr. Lawrence is saying that Judge Roman Act denied his motion and now.
After the Fact he wants to disqualify Judge Romanek that’s not the way it
works,
69. ASA: Yolanda Simmons Right.
70. Judge Forti:
But you’re involved in Simmons because Mister Lawrence filed a complaint
against the assistant state’s attorney and a slew of other people, He claims
that, You have got notice of this and
that is why I want you to be on this because he has filed a motion for default
71. Joe Louis Lawrence: Your Honor, First of all, You’re confusing the issues with all due
respect!
72. Judge Forti:
No I’m not Mr. Lawrence. Please be quiet. Please be quiet. I want Miss
Simmons to look into this.
73. ASA Yolanda Simmons: So you’re under what I have. The last
order on the most relevant order I have is from judge Romanek returning the case to calendar 61. So that’s
what I have.
74. Judge Forti:
All right. And she returned it back to me because the motion to
disqualify against me was denied. So you understand that Mr. Lawrence, you
tried to get me disqualified and Judge Romanek said no.
75. Joe Louis Lawrence: But she was biased and she didn’t send the case to Judge Scannicchio,
She sent the case directly to you. And I did that. But that’s O. K. Because it
went through calendar one.
76. Joe Louis Lawrence: No, it didn’t.
77. Judge Forti: Yes, it did. You understand?
78. Joe Louis Lawrence:
Where’s the court order at? There’s no court order. There’s no court
order from Judge Scannicchio sending the
case back to you.
79. Judge Forti: And the reason is the only. Thing that
matters is that judge Scannicchio that Judge Romanek denied the motion to qualify. I mean, yes, to disqualify it. Stayed on calendar. What?
So that portion of the case is finished. Do you see an order? Miss Simmons of
Judge Romanek denying the motion that?
80. ASA: Yolanda Simmons: I see that I have that order right here
your Honor.
81. Judge Forti:
Fine. Judgment. And your honor. All right, you accept that Mr. Lawrence?
82. Joe Louis Lawrence: No, I don’t.
83. Judge Forti: All right, why not?
84. Joe Louis Lawrence: It’s because Judge Scannicchio was the
one that’s supposed to send the case back to you. Not Romanek sending the case
to you directly.
85. Judge Forti: It went through calendar one. It was
the only place. The only place, Sir, once Judge Romanak denied the motion for
cause. It had to come back here. Plain and simple. So I. have the case. And
Miss Simmons back to what I said, he has filed a motion for default against the
state.
86. ASA: Yolanda Simmons: OK, now.
87. Joe Louis Lawrence:
So I am. I’m respectfully objecting to the state being involved because
judged when Eileen Burke was a judge, she was involved in this matter and
denied..
88. Judge Forti:
And at the moment, Sir, Sir, this is falling. I’m telling you that you
have filed a motion against a variety of parties, including the assistant
state’s attorney. You got him. You filed a motion for default. Isn’t that,
right?
89. Joe Louis Lawrence: That is correct. And I also filed a
motion to go to a different venue
90. Judge Forti: I am letting him Miss Simmons know
that you filed this motion for default. And I want to know what Miss Simmons’s
position is now.
91. ASA: At this time, I
have received some emails on this case. From Scannicchio Clerk as well as from
our own internal policies on how we handle with these cases. Your honor. I’m
going to have to set this for brief continuance and get more clarification from
my supervised attorney about how we handle these types of cases given the
nature of what Mr. Lawrence has filed. So what date?
92. Judge Forti:
So what day?
93. ASA: I want to say this for January 30th. I’m I’m
sorry. January 3rd.
94. Judge Forti: is that work, Mr. Lawrence?
95. Joe Louis Lawrence: It’s fine.
96. ASA: Can you come back here at noon?
97. Joe Louis Lawrence:
Back to zoom?
98. ASA: Yes.
99. Joe Yes
100.
Judge
Forti: And the issue is
where it where you’re get your getting Miss Simmons is seeking the continuance
with respect to the fact that you re noticed your motion for default
101.
Joe
Louis Lawrence: And for the Cook County Judiciary to be recused as well.
102.
Judge
Forti: That I cannot
do.
103.
Joe
Louis Lawrence: And we
still have Maritza Martinez motion that have not been addressed that I paid to
$75 for
104.
Judge
Forti: You need to go
back to Miss Judge Martinez I can only handle because I have not recused myself
and your effort to get me recused by virtue of the SOJ was denied. So I am.
Keeping this case until at least we see what Miss Simmons says on the motion
for default anything relating to Judge Romanek or Judge Martinez you have to
raise in those courtrooms all right. So Miss Simmons, what do you have Mr.
Lawrence’s contact information?
105.
ASA: I did get a phone number from Mr.
Lawrence Let me see if I still have your
number at 312-965-6455.
106.
Joe
Louis Lawrence: That is
correct.
107.
ASA: All right, Mr. Lawrence, I have you.
108.
Judge
Forti: All right. Thank
you, Mr. Lawrence. All right, Miss Simmons, what other matters do we have?
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned events enumerated within said document
pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set
forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters
therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the
undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
The
following is a case where a Black Man was remanded and incarcerated not for any
criminal offense but for not taking a Genetic Test.
I have never
had a DNA test on the 88 D 079012 case even though a Default was entered and
never VACATED May 18, 1988 Cook County Judges still violated my Civil Rights
had me REMANDED forced off my Cook County Sheriffs Position, Illegally forced
off my CTA Position as Ronald Bartkowicz and Assistant States Attorneys trumped
up charges backdated Police Officer Francoise Hightower’s daughter Tycee
Hightower’s age making her a minor from 2002-2007
Pursuant to
Fed Rule 8 and 9 see the attached Emails Particularizing the Terrorist Acts of
Fraud by “Private Citizens” impersonating law abiding judges
I AM IN KANGAROO COURT a Racist judge
allegedly told the African American Clerks to not put me on her calendar and to put me
on Forti’s calendar because he would know what to do, this judge never should
have been in a robe or licensed to practice law, this conversation of what took
place Dec 13, 2024 is a clear example of egregious violations of Title
V11
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981)
Prima Facia
Showing of Judge Chivira and Martinez using their Judicial Robes Obstructing
Justice acting like Gang Bangers or Thugs and is seemingly trying to recruit
all of the racist or sexist Hispanic judges to assist her in this Civil Rights
Scandal of trying to cover-up her involvement as an Assistant States Attorney
she colluded with her Superior Thomas
Kantas and falsified a number of documents mainly it was explained that they
backdated Tycee’s age to make it look like she was 10 years younger when she
was emancipated and I was Francoise’s ex husband angry because of the divorce
and was retaliating against her by not making child support payments to justify
getting some of the most racist judges to go along with this EGREGIOUS
EXTORTION ATTEMPT but nobody knew I was on Welfare and had to pay my welfare
money in Judge Haracz’s court to keep from going to jail because he was just a
bill collector and Police Officer Francoise had papers falsified to reflect she
was on welfare.
1.
Former CCSA Thomas Kantas was the point person in the
hierarchy of the States Attorney’s
office who had Carolyn Kennedy, Amy Bernard and Brian Volkman
representing Police Officer Francoise Hightower when her daughter was 21 years
old receiving numerous unlawful court orders, whereby; Defendant had been
REMANDED into CUSTODY 5 times for ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT, see the Notice
of Petition filed Nov 1, 2005 and all related documents demonstrating
the States Attorneys representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara
Hightower-Belmer (totaling 17 pages).
A- Hereto
attached Gr Ex I, Yolanda Banks of Div of Child Support committed MAIL
FRAUD & PERJURY mailed to Alpha Baking, Interstate Brands Corp.
Fraudulent documents seeking Defendant’s wages in 2005 while Tycee was 21 years
old.
2.
That former Jewish Judge Moche Jacobius whom Respondent
met and knew when he was an Assistant Attorney General told him that he heard
about him attorneys were speaking up on how he was defending himself in the
early 1990’s appointed him a Jewish attorney Gerald Nordgreen where he was held
in Contempt of Court for Allegedly Owing Child Support, hereto attached, Gr
Ex B, and C Court Order that FALSELY STATES In Re the Former
Marriage of Francoise Hightower v Joseph Lawrence
3.
September 21, 2023, the
Supreme Court of Illinois entered an order striking Thomas Alexander Kantas’s
name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois amid
allegations of fraud and deception. Posted by AlabNews Staff
Writer | Oct 24, 2023 | News, Illinois, State Level
No comments:
Post a Comment