Donald Trump's victory and return back to the White House marks the end to PLANTATION POLITICS in Chicago, Illinois where Black and Brown Democrats are mere sellouts and are the main people used in the Political Machine to uphold Racism, Tyranny and Corruption supporting every aspect of DIABOLICAL INJUSTICES on all levels in City government.
A MESSAGE TO THE FBI AND ALL MEMBERS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IS ATTACHED
Like all International Groups when they commit heinous crimes, they have signature profiles letting the world know who they are here in Chicago it has been asserted that the KU KLUX KLAN and other RACIST FRATERNAL groups controlled the Judiciary and State Agencies and Negros and certain Hispanics were only figureheads in the Democratic Party----TO THIS DAY NOBODY HAS DENIED THIS OR OBJECTED TO ANY FACTUAL DOCUMENT PUT BEFORE THE COURTS.
A woman Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower sleeps with her natural biological father (William Jenkins Hightower who was a Police Officer) impregnated her and her younger sister but he was arrested for impregnated her but was allowed to return back to the Police force because of his alleged connections to Commander John Burge.
Every Irish, Polish except Richard J. Daley acted as the KU KLUX KLAN and every inferior Black in positions of authority put their heads down closed their eyes to all levels of egregious injustices by going along with everything wrong so as to be accepted and loved by the racist Machine Operatives who controlled or appointed the Colored persons in the Machine.
Paternity case 88 D 079012 where Francoise admitted to sleeping with her father and having a sexual transmitted disease, I was never served to be in court, but so many racist judges in the Democratic Party have recruited over 50 judges and now States Attorney Eilene O'Neil Burke who was once an Appellate Judge DENIED every Motion filed in the Appellate Court.
This is how the Democratic Party create JOB SECURITY off of the innocent lives of so many Colored and Blacks victimized by the Political Machine.
Racist white judges know that Black Democrats have no power and are only figureheads in that so many Blacks and certain Hispanics won't say anything or report racist judges or any type of employee when a Colored Person is being egregiously affected by Terrorism or Racism as in this case, November 21, 1984, Tycee Hightower will be 40 years old and is not my child but Francoise as a Police Officer managed to recruit some of the most racist judges and clerks in Cook County had me illegally forced off my CTA job, as Judge Ronald Bartkowicz who was on the judges ballot initiated a bogus warrant saying, a domestic abuse crime was committed on Francoise etc
I was locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support on a case DISMISSED Sept 17, 1987, when Richard J. Daley was the States Attorney, 85 D 068184 where the Paternity Tests excluded me but was altered to reflect the child was mine, but a JURY TRIAL was requested.
Today right now, I am still appearing before the courts as RACIST JUDGES still are trying to protect their people who is caught up FIXING the paternity case in an attempt to prevent paying him a judgment for every illegal corrupt act perpetrated against me.
MANY OF THE DEMOCRATS IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS ARE OF THE PLANTATION MENTALITY WHO STILL VIEW RACIST JUDGES AS MASSA kinda like the character in DJANGO UNCHAINED (STEPHEN) Chicago is full of these types of people who will never speak up or do anything without the permission of their white Master.
Thu, Nov 7 at 12:00 AMIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT—DOMESTIC RELATIONS
Nov. 7, 2024
COURTESY COPY PART III
In the Matter of Francoise Hightower v Joe Louis Lawrence
88 D 079012
Dear FBI and all Members of Law Enforcement as Democratic Judges and Clerks in Cook County and State Agencies who have ADMITTED to taking part in every aspect that this Respondent has eloquently particularized in all of his AFFIDAVITS.
1.) We are proud of who we are and do not answer to COLORED, JEWS NI&&ERS AND WILL never issue any favorable rulings to any person of that origin.
2.) Colored and Ni&&ers do what we tell them and every last one of them is aware of this otherwise, they would not be in their positions, YOU see how obedient so many of them have been to us all of these years? We only sponsor the obedient ones who keep their mouths shut and do what we tell them
3.) We will continue to control the Judiciary and State Agencies and is CHALLENGING any of you to try and remove us we are a one for all and all for one Fraternal Order.
4.) None of these People can think straight if we don’t tell them what to do and so many of them are ready to go to prison to be a part of our fraternal Order just read what those kinds of people are willing to do to their own ethnic groups to be accepted in the Democratic Party, they need us to tell them when to piss or eat as you can see Mr. FBI every last one of them are mere figureheads doing what they are told.
5.) Lastly, no DEMOCRAT is going to rule in favor of the NI&&ER RESPONDENT, that son of a Bitch just won’t give up! OR THE JOHNSON SISTERS on that Illegal Foreclosure Derico know what he is supposed to do.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISIO1N
IN RE
)
)
Francoise
Hightower
) Judge Abbey Fishman
Romanek
Petitioner
)
) Cal 94
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
Respondent
) Room 3008
RESPONDENT’S
MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE
ABBEY ROMANEK INSTANTER OF JUDGE FOR “CAUSE” “BEING A RACIST” HATE BIAS
PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) JUDGE RECEIVED COURT ORDER FROM
PRESIDING JUDGE & ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY AND HER CLERK OF THE STATES
ATTORNEY REPRESENTING POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER IN SAID PATERNITY
MATTER AND SAID “I THINK IT’S A MISTAKE OF FACT AND CAN BE CURED” JUDGE ROMANEK
UNEQUIVOCALLY BECAME A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” ATTACHING A PERSONAL BIAS ENGAGING IN
AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CIVIL
RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON
OFFENSES MAKING HER ORDER VOID/NULLITY
DUE TO PRIMA FACIE SHOWING STATES
ATTORNEY ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR
ROLES IN SAID CONSPIRACY AND JUDGE TRIED
TO USE HER UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY IN COVERING-UP CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES
ATTORNEYS UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT VACATE NOV 1st COURT ORDER MOST
IMPORTANTLY SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED DEC 4, 2023, WAS ADMITTED TO BY STATES
ATTORNEY KIM FOXX AND FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER LOCAL RULE Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B). DEFAULT WAS
FILED ORIGINALLY FEB 9, 2024, RE NOTICED JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ ENTERED AN
ORDER MARCH 27, 2024 RETURNING THE CASE BACK TO JUDGE IRIS Y. CHIVIRA REFUSING
TO VACATE HER OBSTRUCTIVE ORDER BECAUSE PRESIDING JUDGE NEVER AUTHORIZED OR
SIGNED A COURT ORDER ASSIGINING THE CASE TO JUDGE MARTINEZ CORROBORATING DEMOCRATIC RACIAL HATE AND CORRUPTION
CONTROLLING THE JUDICIARY RESPONDENT FILED AN APPEARANCE FOR THE FIRST TIME
SEPT 19, 2024 CORROBORATING NO JUDGE EVER HAD JURISDICTION ON HIM WITH
AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel
Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and
files herewith his Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification
Judge Abbey Romanek Instanter et al;
- That
Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528
(2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full
knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”
- That under 18 U.S.C.
242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion
on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow.
People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
It appears no judge seems to
understand they can’t invoke jurisdiction until Judge Martinez Vacates her
unlawful court order of March 27 and Feb 2024.
3. That this is the actual
Communication from the Motion Call of Nov 1, 2024 9:05 call, Francoise
Hightower was a NO SHOW, but Assistant States Attorney Madison Mathis was
present but had no court file and Judge Romanek did not pass the case like judges
normally do.
4. Judge
Abbey Romanek: Are there any
attorneys on the Hightower case? I
thought they were.
5. Judges
Clerk April: I don’t. think so, I
was told that the state was involved in this case. So I don’t other than that,
I don’t think they are.
6. Assistant
States Attorney Madison Mathis: I am
trying to double check our involvement on this matter.
7. Judge
Abbey Romanek: OK in any event, Sir, Mr. Lawrence, can you unmute and raise your right
hand, please? Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, The whole truth. So help
you God.
8. Joe
Louis Lawrence: Yes Ma’am
9. Judge
Abbey Romanek: OK, all right, Sir. You’re looking to move your case from
Judge Forti for cause. What is the reason?
10. Joe
Louis Lawrence: I’ve cited the reasons in my motion. Your honor he
indicated that Francois was representing herself when in fact the state’s
attorney have been representing Francois since the inception of this case. I
have never been served in this matter and the default was entered and never
vacated. So all of the events that have taken place in this matter has been
articulated within the motion and submitted with an affidavit.
11. Judge
Abbey Romanek: Ok, So are you willing to move
forward based on just your affidavit and your information and the information
in your motion?
12. Joe
Louis Lawrence: Yeah, that is correct your honor.
13. Judge
Abbey Romanek: Ok, I have a question for you
though. When did, did you do a motion to vacate the default?
14. Joe
Louis Lawrence: The motion to vacate the default was done in August of
1988. But the wrong date was in fact vacated which kept the May 18 1988 default
order legally in place.
15. Judge
Abbey Romanek: O. K. You don’t talk about that at all in your motion.
16. Joe
Louis Lawrence No, no. The motion to disqualify the judge is different from
the events I did a petition for re for rehearing. I sent an email to you. Particularizing
the events so that we would know how to move forward on this case. The fact
that Judge Forti was not reviewing any of the information that was presented to
him. I came to court basically to see exactly how your honor wanted to move
forward on this matter. Now as far as you wanting the specific information
about what I did I could have had that itemized and presented to you today.
17. Judge Abbey Romanek: Oh O. K. Well, I just
asked you what I, I didn’t see anything about your default so maybe that’s not
part of this OK. Thank you, sir. I
understand that you are moving forward to move Mr. or sorry judge Forti from
this case based on the fact that you, there’s a conspiracy and what looks like
judges acting as Ku Klux Klansmen.
18. Joe
Louis Lawrence: Can I interject respectfully your honor?
19. Judge
Abbey Romanek OK, well, he’s you’re calling. You’re saying he’s a racist
Sir?
20. Joe
Louis Lawrence: Your Honor, Judge. Forti indicated that Francois was self-
representing herself when the documents in the motion and in all my court
orders showed that the state’s attorney has in fact been representing Francois Hightower as a police officer. That within
itself, Your Honor show’s bias and complicity. What else must I do to show that
there’s bias?
21. Judge
Abbey Romanek: O. K. All right. Well, I don’t find that to be biased and
complicity. I find that to be a mistake of fact, which can be easily fixed. The
States Attorney is here and they don’t and aren’t aware of this case at all. So
I’m not even sure that they are involved in this case.
22. Joe
Louis Lawrence: But I submitted the court orders showing that the state’s
attorney did,
23. Judge
Romanek: Well ok in fact, well, then that’s just a mistake of fact. And if
that’s the case, then that can be cured. It doesn’t show bias. So your motion
to
24. Assistant
States Attorney Madison Mathis: Your honor, I actually found this case in
one of our databases. It looks like it looks like it had been taken off call
for non-states attorney matter back on
Let’s see here March 27th of 2024.
25. Judge
Romanek: But I see something here from May 20.
26. Assistant
States Attorney Madison Mathis: Oh, OK. But it looks like the state has
worked on this case before.
27. Judge
Romanek: But they’re not currently
involved? But I don’t. I don’t have the file on hand. I think that’s just the
issue likely if respondent filed an emergency motion that would be why I don’t
have the file on hand.
28. Judge
Romanek: OK, Alright. So I. think it’s a mistake of fact and can be cured
and does not prove bias on that on behalf of Judge Forti. So Sir your motion is
respectfully denied and we will send this case back to Judge Forti. Thank you.
I have my 9:30 calls. We have his information.
Section
1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell
v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the
conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a
conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for
the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was
actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws,
the gist of the action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under
42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505,
John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4th ed. 1992).
A- That
Pursuant to Par 21, Judge Romanek stated, “I don’t find that to be
biased and complicity. I find that to be a mistake of fact et al. The States
Attorney is here and they don’t and aren’t aware et al. and in Par 25
acknowledges, “I see something here from May 20,”
B- Judge
Romanek in her own admission acknowledged seeing a court order but acted as if
she thought ASA Madison Mathis was going to violate
RPC 3.3, but she told the truth and demonstrated integrity which is rare in
Cook County Courts. Ethics
All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be
particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.
RPC
3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the
standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of
that rule states:
(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
B- That on July
9, 2024 on Judge Arce’s Call Cal D, Francoise Hightower was Present with
the Assistant States Attorney where she checked off In Re Parentage of, In
Re Allocation of Parental Responsibilities and signed by the Judge.
C- That it
is definitely apparent certain corrupt renegade Assistant States Attorneys
acting as “Private Citizens” are methodically trying to make sure that only the
racist Bias judges handle this case and is probably why the judges on the 30th
Floor only receive any Motions file to Disqualify any judge because that floor
alone harbors most of the racist hateful judges in Cook County and the 28th
floor is the floor where homes are illegally foreclosed on and stolen from hard
working Colored or Black citizens.
D- A RACIST JUDGE
WILL NEVER SEE WHAT ANOTHER PERSON OF THEIR KIND IS EVER DOING WRONG BECAUSE IT
IS NORMAL BEHAVIOR.
29. Respondent was advised by a competent reliable
source not to inundate Judge Romanek with so many filings ( my interpretation
don’t be the warrior), hereto attached Email sent Tuesday Oct. 29, at 1:07 pm
A- See many don’t realize is
that Judges/Clerks of Polish and Irish ethnicity already informed me that their
people were REDNECKS, or GOOD OL BOYS and have Ku Klux Klan backgrounds and
made it clear that Blacks were worse and no better and would never help me
because they have to do what they are told, in that a True Racist will never
back down their hateful disposition towards any person of Color.
B- Said Email Par 1, Would you
like a Briefing schedule et al?
30. That Judge Romanek had a
personal agenda, she wanted to let her colleagues know from her actions, she
could upstage the Respondent with her interrogations, she reminds me of the
late Morgan Hamilton who was a permanent Associate Judge, when the Sheriffs and
Clerks asked me my choice of judges who were going to replace my former
attorney and judge on my divorce case (William S. Boyd), I knew Jeane Bernstein
didn’t like Hispanics and Morgan Hamilton didn’t like Brothers, before I could open
my mouth Hamilton she said screaming from her chambers, “YALL STILL HAVING
PROBLEMS WITH THAT NIGGER? GIVE HIM TO ME, I’LL TAKE CARE OF HIM” everybody
in the court were Caucasian Deputies and Attorneys as I digress,
31. That Par 11, Judge
Romanek stated “ Ok, So are you willing to move
forward based on just your affidavit and your information and the information
in your motion?
A- The State’s Attorney has not
objected nor is Francoise present but now the judge is initiating a Personal
interest; thereby, corroborating now how she has become complicit in this
Criminal Conspiracy never at anytime did she ask if Francoise Hightower
received notice or knowledge as if she was already aware of her not going to be
in court.
32. Respondent
already knew the type of judges he was going to be met with never expected to
be before a competent judge with integrity and to this day not one judge disappointed
him in that said SUMMARY JUDGMENT was filed Dec 4, 2023, accompanied
by Affidavit, Served on the States Attorney and Francoise Hightower.
33. That the States
Attorney Kim Foxx and Police Officer Francoise L. B. Hightower have ADMITTED to
all PLEADINGS Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1.
34. That said judge became the De facto attorney for Francoise by
asking questions, Par 13, I have a question for you though. When
did, did you do a motion to vacate the default?
B- It was apparent Judge
Romanek was stunned by Respondent’s articulate diction in his responses to
every question she presented which yielded an unintelligent reply by saying it
was a Mistake of Fact that can be cured, that’s like saying it is daylight and
dark outside at the same time and it only looks like it is dark outside because
you are wearing sunglasses.
35. That on two specific occasions,
I was present in court and a judge was having a Hearing and a Caucasian
Attorney had presented a Motion with an Affidavit and opposing Counsel tried to
argue his way without any response, the attorney went to respond and the judge
stopped him telling him why mess up you stated you were standing on your
Motion, the judge ruled in favor of the Attorney with the supporting affidavit
to his Motion.
36.
37. On the other occasion a well-represented
articulate Caucasian female attorney representing an African American where opposing
Counsel didn’t respond to the Motion for the Hearing and tried to finesse the
judge and they tried baiting the professional Caucasian woman attorney into an
argument, the judge asked her if she had a reply to their argument, she told
the judge she was standing on her Motion and the judge ruled in her favor.
38.
39. Respondent stood on his
Motion unopposed and the judge still denied his Motion to Disqualify Judge
Forti it is judges like her and so many others is why the jails are filled with
men of Color because her kind don’t recognize their innocence or their academic
ability to present a formidable defense even when the evidence proves within
the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard required in the Illinois Rules of
Civil Procedures.
40.
41. That the ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
STANDING COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL EVALUATIONS-COOK COUNTY 2022 GENERAL ELECTION
CANDIDATES SEEKING TO FILL JUDICIAL VACANCIES IRIS Y. CHAVIRA ---NOT
RECOMMENDED
Alliance
Evaluation Results
The Alliance of Bar Associations
includes 12 bar associations that work collaboratively to evaluate judicial
candidates, but publish independent recommendations.
· Bar Association Approval Key:
· High (>7 Bars Approve)
· Low (<5 Bars Approve)
· Results Pending
ALL BARS FOUND HER NOT RECOMMENDED
Iris Y. Chivira
declined to participate in the judicial evaluation process. Pursuant to ISBA
guidelines, Ms. Iris Y. Chavira is found to be NOT RECOMMENDED for election to
the Circuit Court of Cook County.
42. That the 14th SUBCIRCUIT
BROWN VACANCY CHAVIRA IS RUNNING UNOPPOSED IN THE PRIMARY. DISCRIMINATING
AGAINST QUALIFIED ATTORNEYS WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE BALLOT RUNNING AGAINST
HER, VISIT injusticewatch.org/judges.
A-
That
Iris Y. Chivira finagled herself “FRAUDULENTLY” by getting on the
Cook County Ballot UNOPPOSED, with the assistance of other Corrupt Clerks in
Cook County bypassing the integrity process by DISCRIMINATING against QUALIFIED
or OVERLYQUALIFID CANDIDATES from being Cook County judges. INDUCING
RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter,
1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal
Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist.
1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The
elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes
referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of
material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3)
intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in
reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party
resulting from such reliance.
43. That
because of her allegiance to whoever placed her on the Cook County ballot
unopposed, she acted as a “Private Citizen” by unlawfully signing a
Court Order Nov. 29, 2023 as Ex A, the States Attorney having admitted
to all facts recorded in said Motion to Zero Out Child Support et al. 88 D 079012 .
44. That on Nov 14, 2023,
Judge Chavira informed the Caucasian Assistant States Attorney that, she
thought this was her case via Zoom, the ASA informed the judge, that she didn’t
think, they were involved and complained the Motion was over 13 pages (which
made no sense)
A-
Judge Chivira asked if Francoise had been sent a copy,
said reply was yes, and informed the judge that electronic service was emailed
to statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov,
the judge said that is not the correct email and the Caucasian ASA provided sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov.
B-
That most importantly Judge Chivira requested to see
Respondent’s face and directed him on how to navigate his phone so she can see
him, Respondent was in a Parking lot at Advocate on 26th King Drive,
he took his Mom to her Medical Appointment and this was his first time being on
Zoom.
C-
Respondent requested that the judge set a Briefing
schedule so as to ascertain the merits of the Motion because no Clerk in the
Child Support Division could provide him any information and that he had to go
before a judge to obtain any information about the case, she was accurate and
had professional integrity.
D-
The Caucasian ASA immediately Objected to any Briefing
schedule and the judge said she agreed (which is now a Prima Facie showing of Judge
acting as a de facto ASA) and ordered the Respondent to Re file the Motion to
Zero out Child Support and email it to the email just provided from the ASA,
Respondent was confused and asked the Judge, “if the Motion is being
spindled to the next available date?” The judge became hesitant and said
that she was Striking the Motion and (the ASA never objected or requested a
Strike etc.) that the State was going to provide the next court date, hereto
attached, Ex B, Nov 29, Email sent verifying that Respondent never
received a Court Order from the Judge acknowledging he was before the court.
E-
That the ASA Harris made a statement that validated her
role as a Terrorist Conspirator as a “Private Citizen” mentioned that
they had a signed Court Order of 2007, (Tycee was 23 years old) Respondent
Objected to any Court Order of 2007 that Corroborates everything properly
asserted because it not only proves that a judge was complicit in this
conspiracy but the Plaintiff was in fact was an adult and the May 18, 1988
Court Order never Ordered the Respondent to pay anything.
F-
That Respondent was Induced into believing that Judge
Chivira was impartial never acknowledged Respondent was before her or that she
instructed him to Re Notice the Motion as stated in Ex A
corroborates factually why no Bar or the Illinois State Bar Association
never RECOMMENDED her to seek any JUDICIAL VACANCY.
G- That
Ex C, Per Court Order (Filed Nov. 15, 2023) is compliance and veracity
of Judge Chivira/and ASA Harris name recorded on the order of said women
engaging in an ACTIVE CHAIN CONSPIRACY. CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41
ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense need
not have entered into conspiracy at
same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied
upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed;
Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
H-
That the judge nor her Clerk or any member of the
States Attorney’s Office ever mailed to the Respondent a copy of Ex A or
sent it via email and Judge Chivira requested his email Nov. 14, 2023.
I-
That said Motion validated the verity no Court or judge ever had jurisdiction on the Respondent ignored
Defendants valid Affidavits and Exhibits demonstrating Prejudice and Bias
behavior pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-----1001 (a) (3); Sup. Ct. Rule 63 (C) (1),
due to Racial Hate Bias.
45. That
because of the Respondent’s skin color and alleged sexual orientation
Respondent has been held at a legal standard higher than every white, Colored
unqualified attorney or States Attorney,
he has been before in all of the courts in that, every white judge demonstrated
their demonic hate by closing their eyes to the draconian criminal Terrorists
Acts and whoever has assumed the position of Alderman Edward Burke assigning
attorneys to the Cook County Ballot putting who they want as judges or is still
appointing racist Brethren judges, assuming his position and it is still
business as usual, they are still continuing this mayhem selecting unqualified
thugs with law licenses as if nobody is reading or watching.
46. So
that everyone is clear that this matter is being observed after emailing
(Motion for Summary Judgment et al.) Judge Chivira and the ASA from the law
library in Cook County ScanEz station Dec. 4, at 1:30pm and sending it to two
private emails someone in a pay upgrade surpassing everyone involved removed
them from his emails, unlawful1.blogspot.com has a detailed narrative of
how cases are “Fixed” in Cook County and State Courts.
47. That
said judge along with a plethora of hateful Black Women allegedly figured if
their acts are on Black or Brown Men the powerfully connected racist White Men
controlling the Democratic Political Machine would reward and save them from
any prosecutions and Francoise has been rewarded tremendously exercising the
racist side from her mother’s heritage embracing diabolical hatred going with
Ku Klux Klan tyranny trying to receive money Respondent never owed her but she
had her father’s child and he had an Irish Drunk judge to issue an Order
Respondent was not to see the child Judge James J. Meehan in 1989.
48. That
what every attorney, Judge or Assistant States Attorneys or Assistant Attorney
Generals didn’t realize is that Respondent was prepared for the Ku Klux Klan or
any of their inferior sellouts on any bench, while it was not the intention to
trap Hispanic Judge Iris Y. Chivira she had an out by not signing any
court orders but the objective was to reel in some of the most racist hateful
men on the bench, trapping Colored people was a given because many of them
don’t read and believe the racist Political Machine Operatives will or can save
them.
49. That
a Polaco aka “Good Ol Boy” (Law Division Judge Ronald Bartkowicz)
admitted fucking over the Respondent and it seemed to have perturbed another “Good
ol Boy” Appellate Court judge “Private Citizen Terrance J. Lavine”
in a horrific manner, he has done everything unimaginable to keep said
admission from being a part of the Appellate Record, that certain State
employees in the Labor Board deleted trying to save the CTA/ATU Local 241 in
that Gr Ex D, Motion for
Disqualification of judge et al. a Anglo-Saxon Man admitting he has WRONGED
a FREE BLACK MAN, See the Court Order Oct. 14, 1994, “APPEARING ON
THE RESPONDENT’S CALL TO RECUSE BECAUSE OF MY PRIOR ASSOCIATION WITH CHICAGO
TRANSIT AUTHORITY” See Motion his initials RB.
No comments:
Post a Comment