Calling on #GovPritzker to invoke jurisdiction to have #IrisYChavira to be removed
from the bench as a judge Instanter her motive in signing a court order
was either racial or she was allegedly paid off.
She is a former Assistant States Attorney and never presented any court orders
only after the Motion for Summary Judgment seeking $50 Million Dollars
a court order enters the data system.
Former Alderman Edward Burke is on trial of his life using his Aldermanic
position in trying to shake down Burger King owners and many Black and Brown
judges or politicians seems to think as long as they are shaking down or
committing racist acts on Black or Brown people nobody will care or investigate
any of the claims.
Racism Hate and Corruption is how things are done in Chicago/Cook County
#GovPritzker as a Caucasian you are the only person that can effect a change
because not one Black person will address these issues now certain
Hispanics who want to be accepted by the Political Machine is doing
whatever it takes as a alumni of Depaul University law school, I didn't trust the
judge because #EdwardBurke went to Depaul law school, but I Iet everything
play out in the courts.
Her signature on the court order corroborates her as a Corrupt judge and
in no way should she continue to ruin the lives of other Black and Brown men
the objective was to trap some of the most racist egregious hateful Irish
or Polish judges never expected a Hispanic person getting caught up
especially a woman.
I need your help again Sir.
Thank you
Governor Pritzker
Office
of the Governor
207
State House
Springfield, IL 62706
June 26, 2020
Dear Governor
Pritzker:
OFFICIAL
COMPLAINT AGAINST EMPLOYERS IN THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT
DIVISION ENGAGING IN AN ELABORATE EXTORTION OPERATION DISGUISED AS CHILD
SUPPORT
I need your
help because of the color of my skin and the systemic racial injustice
experienced by racist judges protecting and upholding corruption by former
Police officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer.
The very
protests that has taken place in this city and all over the world is symbolic
to the very injustices that, I have experienced here in this city, for example,
September 17, 1987 a paternity matter was voluntarily non-suited against me 84
D 068184 where a jury trial was requested where both paternity tests
excluded me from being the father but was altered with the true readings
showing that, I was excluded.
You got involved Governor and a gentleman on the State level called me and said that
their was never a child support order entered against me for me to pay anything but he saw that
judges were entering arrearage orders it is clear he was able to see, I had no knowledge, he advised me to
contact an investigative reporter Pam Zekman or Dave Savini because they have judges working with them
and asked me if this went public if, I minded my name be mentioned, I told him,
I didn't care.
| Activity Date: | 11/28/2023 | Event Desc: | Motion To - Denied - | Comments: | On a Petition to zero out child support |
Jussie Smollett an outspoken Homosexual told a blatant lie about a racial event happening to him and received media coverage surpassing human imagination, I am a Heterosexual and provided transcripts, affidavits and was locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support to woman impregnated by her biological father as a Police Officer, she is now a Police Officer.
Not one media person investigated or asked me any questions, I am beginning to feel that since my status is Heterosexual and Brown complexioned the news seems to only be slighted towards certain individuals based upon their sexuality or sordid criminal acts killing or carjacking etc.
Now if I am wrong, I would like for someone to give me their assessment as to why my issue is not receiving media support?
Years ago, I complained to the FBI about judges possibly being a part of the Ku Klux Klan
and explained how IBC/Wonderbread was somehow connected to the paternity case where judges were locking me up for allegedly owing child support, initially the very judges complained about they ended up dying or leaving the bench but they did say if, I was able to show the paternity case was connected to the CTA and IBC/wonderbread, that would not be a coincidence but a pattern and corroboration behind my assertions.
I asked them if, I could wear a wire they disagreed and told me that, I would have to obtain corroboration in a different manner.
The Feds got Burke and is in a position to get every Colored Person after reading this post because it shows a blatant account of criminal activity of Black Judges and State employees
committing crimes basically saying FUCK THE FEDS, the shit Black and Brown people are doing surpasses human imagination, many are psychotic sociopaths, and you wonder why the youths are so brazen and criminally minded, due to their elders in the Democratic Party only being figureheads not with any full authority only on Black and Brown ethnic groups.
Read for yourself how Black and Brown judges and State employees violate the Civil Rights of Black and Brown people as every prominent Black Democrat kept their mouths shut
so as not to offend or upset their Political Masters.
The child support Division is a sophisticated EXTORTION OPERATION,
used to CRIMINALIZE Black and Brown men as a way to keep them disenfranchised
from the employment arena, this new way of MODERN DAY SLAVERY and
APARTHEID in the legal arena is real.
Black and Brown Men have been Tortured and falsely imprisoned for 20, 30,+ years
Seniors are having their homes illegally stolen from them in the guise of FORECLOSURE
Not one Black Democrat can open their mouths and say shit because of their
inferior disposition in the Party
Every Irish Judge Indicted ADLERMAN EDWARD BURKE assigned to this case
locked me up wrongfully Racist Ass Ronald Bartkowicz issued a Bogus Warrant
against me for Francoise saying I beat her up, while handcuffed, he had #CTA personnel
to come take my CTA badge off my body 26115.
Racist Ass David E. Haracz assigned to this paternity case, he was a supervisor with legal aid
when, I was seeking their legal assistance, he turned me down saying that their were too many judges on the case but when Burke assigned him to the case he had me REMANDED INTO CUSTODY for allegedly owing child support while, I was on Public Aid and told me that, Biologically the child is not mine he is just a BILL COLLECTOR and have to get money IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK
COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
#FrancoiseHightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS/FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND
RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” COMPLICIT
IN THIS CHILD SUPPORT SCAM OF ILLINOIS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE FRAUDULENTLY
FALSIFYING COURT DOCUMENTS CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY 5
TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT AND THE CTA NOT REINSTATING HIM BACK TO
WORK BECAUSE THEY DESTROYED HIS EMPLOYMENT RECORDS TRYING TO COVER-UP JUDGES
ALLOWING EXTORTION OF HIS WAGES TO POLICE OFFICER & JUDGE MANUFACTURING AN
UNLAWFUL WARRANT IN THIS CONSPIRACY AND IS SEEKING $50 MILLION DOLLARS w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Respondent, Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this
court the reasons and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Motion for
Summary Judgment et al;
Respectfully
Submitted,
By: _________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
This is an updated version of Lynching, they
do not see African American or Hispanic Men, as men, but as NI**AS, this case
demonstrates how to destroy and Criminalize the Black, Hispanic man.
When people ask how and why, Did all
the judges enter orders against you and you were never served? They did the
same thing YOU did ignored Defendant and assumed he was a Typical NI**A,
Passive NI**A, Ignorant NI**A, while the laws clearly demonstrate my innocence
they say NI**A you GUILTY, there is no such thing as an innocent Black man he
is Guilty of something, I say I am a CTA employee they say NI**A you ain’t, we
Destroyed your employment files, and the Negros there do whatever we tell them
to do, I say I worked for IBC/Wonder bread and was off due to a work-related
injury they say NI**A you were DISCHARGED, I say I had a wife and 5 children
they say NI**A you don’t have any dependent’s, Because no judge signed a Court
Order saying you had any children, your child is Tycee, I say I AM that That I AM somebody, they say
NI**A you don’t get it, you don’t exist, I say I am Educated I have spent 12-14
hours a day in the Law Library studying the law and it’s applications, they
laugh at me and say NI**A it ain’t what you know, it is who you know, I say I
have applied the laws better than all of your best involved in this conspiracy,
they say NI**A you right, because everyone involved is related to someone who
is related to someone no one is listening, I say I have proof they say NI**A
there is no such thing as proof, I say what do you mean? They say NI**A we Lie,
we Destroy, we Cheat we Intimidate/Threaten we Undermine anyone necessary to
advance our Doctrines, I say my faith is in GOD, they Laugh at me and say NI**A
where was your GOD all those years when we Economically Murdered you?, NI**A
where was your GOD all those years when we Assassinated your Character, NI**A
where was your GOD all those years when we Buried your ASS left you for DEAD, N**A
you should be on CRACK/HEROIN, NI**A you ain’t committed SUICIDE, NI**A you
should’a ROBBED somebody, NI**A you look GOOD how come you ain’t PIMPIN? NI**A
with your MIND you can be the best DRUG DEALER, wait a minute NI**A who are
you? How come nothing seems to have WORKED? First of All I am no NI**A the GOD
I serve moves me by way of the SPIRIT, When I seek JUSTICE you reward me
INJUSTICE, when I seek HELP, you LAUGH at me, when my family and I suffer you
CELERBRATE.
Psalm 121 Verse 1, 2, I will lift up mine eyes
unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. My help cometh from the Lord, which
made Heaven and earth.
Defendant was job security for all of the
racist, inferior intellectually challenged attorneys that was deployed to take
him on litigiously so as to demonstrate “White Supremacy” is how Chicago is
governed and ran in the United States of America, under the Democratic Machine
no man of color was to provide for his family only Welfare, no man of color was
to have a job only Welfare, no man of color was to have an education if it
looks as if you have some intellect, the Wrath of Racism will be deployed against anyone who won’t
succumb to their JIM CROW tactics as demonstrated in this case.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
AFFIDAVIT
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT
1.
I am Joe Louis
Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Respondent in this cause, being first duly sworn on
oath deposes and states, as follows;
2.
That on Oct. 26, 2023 Respondent Filed a Motion to Zero Out Child
Support and served the last Attorney of Record States Attorney and Chicago
Police Officer Francoise L. B. Hightower on the same day, hereto attached, Ex
A Proof of Delivery .
3.
That on Nov 28, 2023
Francoise L.B. Hightower, her daughter and Assistant States Attorney acting as
a “Private Citizen” made Perjured Admissions to the court of a
Court Order of 2007 being entered Ordering the Respondent to pay CHILD SUPPORT.
4.
That in 2007
Tycee Laqita Hightower was 23 years old and was EMANCIPATED in 2002
and at no time did she, Francoise her mother or the States Attorney Object,
Respond or Deny to any of the Pleadings properly asserted in said Motion
to Zero Out Child Support et al. accompanied with an AFFIDAVIT, even Judge
Chivira as a former States Attorney heard all of the PRIMA FACIE LIES never
questioned any female but stated she was DENYING the Defendant’s Motion, and
noting his objection to what the CCSA presented, hereto attached, Ex H,
Email sent but never answered.
5.
The most
egregious part is when the Negro CCSA asked Francoise if she wanted to waive
the illegal child support or receive it? Her reply was a psychotic sociopath
response was “YES, I want to receive it”!
6.
Former CCSA Thomas Kantas was the point person in the
hierarchy of the States Attorney’s office who had Carolyn Kennedy, Amy Bernard
and Brian Volkman representing Police Officer Francoise Hightower when her
daughter was 21 years old receiving numerous unlawful court orders, whereby;
Defendant had been REMANDED into CUSTODY 5 times for ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD
SUPPORT, see the Notice of Petition filed Nov 1, 2005 and all related
documents demonstrating the States Attorneys representing Police Officer
Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer (totaling 17 pages).
A- Hereto
attached Gr Ex I, Yolanda Banks of Div of Child Support committed MAIL
FRAUD & PERJURY mailed to Alpha Baking, Interstate Brands Corp. Fraudulent
documents seeking Defendant’s wages in 2005 while Tycee was 21 years old.
7.
That former Jewish Judge Moche Jacobius whom Respondent
met and knew when he was an Assistant Attorney General told him that he heard about
him attorneys were speaking up on how he was defending himself in the early
1990’s appointed him a Jewish attorney Gerald Nordgreen where he was held in
Contempt of Court for Allegedly Owing Child Support, hereto attached, Gr Ex
B, and C Court Order that FALSELY STATES In Re the Former
Marriage of Francoise Hightower v Joseph Lawrence
8.
September 21, 2023, the
Supreme Court of Illinois entered an order striking Thomas Alexander Kantas’s
name from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Illinois amid
allegations of fraud and deception. Posted by AlabNews Staff
Writer | Oct 24, 2023 | News, Illinois, State Level
9.
Motions for summary
judgment in Illinois are governed by the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, 735
ILCS 5/2-10051. A defendant may move
for summary judgment at any time1.A party is entitled
to summary judgment if2: The pleadings, depositions and admissions on file, together with
the supporting affidavits (if any) show that there is no genuine issue as to
any material fact.
10.
The
moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
11.
That Pursuant to
Par 2, Page 11 in the Prayer for Relief, Respondent is seeking $50
Million Dollars for the UNLAWFUL REMANDS by Racist Judges acting as “Private
Citizens”
12.
Every Inferior Negro
who had titles in the Democratic Party looked at Burke as if he was their White
Jesus and would commit any crime unimaginable so that their racist Political Machine
Gods would love and accept them but the Irish and Polish ethnic judges were
described as “the Good ol boys” or “White Trash” never feared Black authority
and laughed at it and was aware that
numerous judges engaged in “Racist Terrorist Conspiracies where Respondent
was concerned falsified an entire case 88 D 079012 under the authority and
leadership of former Police Officer Alderman Edward Burke assigned all judges
to enter corrupt unlawful orders on a Paternity Case that was DISMISSED
September 17, 1987,” but because these were RACIST WHITE MEN IN THE
DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, this was a norm violating the Civil Rights of men of color;
13.
That Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Evans was aware of all the egregious HATEFUL KU KLUX KLAN ACTS as
well as the Attorney General Lisa Madigan and States Attorney Anita Alvarez was
aware said judges committing TREASON OFFENSES, but Anita Alvarez was the only
person who told the TRUTH that Defendant never owed any Child Support but
because Defendant was termed a “Ni**er Nobody” the Irish and
Polish had “Legal Orgasms” frolicking as “Private Citizens” using their
positions to flaunt their real Hate for Black and Brown Men as so many Negros
acted as House Ni**ers on a Plantation went along with everything to please
their “White Masters” in the Democratic Political Machine.
14. Anybody involved in this Conspiracy
thought Everybody told Somebody what to cover-up and destroy, to keep nobody of
learning of Everybody’s involvement, the problem was that, Everybody thought
nobody knew and told, Somebody not to worry because Nobody would never know how
they lied, falsified, conspired, and destroyed all documents to save Everybody,
but Somebody knew of what Everybody did and Nobody paid attention because to
them it was a “joke” Anybody became very nervous because now they realize Somebody
lied and now Everybody is in trouble with the LAW and will go to jail because
Everybody thought Somebody was telling the “TRUTH”!
Women’s History Month
Feature: Iris Chavira March 30, 2022
Below is our featured
interview with Iria Chavira, Division Chief and Senior Administrative Law Judge
for the City of Chicago, Department of Administrative Hearings.
What is the most
important lesson you have learned during your legal career about how to thrive
in the profession?
Be yourself. Don’t be afraid to be authentic about who you are,
what you value and where you intend to focus your time and energy.
What do you believe
are the most important attributes of a leader in the legal profession?
Integrity
and compassion. Do the right thing for the right reasons, even if there’s no
audience. Be compassionate towards your clients as well as your colleagues.
Recognizing and understanding another person’s point of view, even if you
disagree, is so important in this profession.
11. That
pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In
General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A)
State in short and
plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) Admit or Deny the allegations
asserted against it by an opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding to the
Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials.
A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a
pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A
party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically
deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically
admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation.
A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must
admit the part that is true and deny the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information.
A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about
the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement, has the effect of
a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An
allegation –other than one relating to the amount of damages –is admitted if a responsive
pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading
is not required an allegation is considered denied or avoided.
That said “Private
Citizens” is relying on other judges in the Illinois Appellate
Court namely Terrance Lavine who has used his robe and jurisdiction
acting as a “Private Citizen” trying to protect and cover-up for his
Irish and Polish Brethren associated in the Hightower scandal by unilaterally
DENYING every lawful Motion accompanied with affidavits no Attorney or
Assistant General has ever objected to or Denied (Case 1-23-1065) but Polish Judge Aurelia Pucinski, Mary Ellen
Coglan, James Fitzgerald Smith closed their eyes as Judge Terrance J. Lavine letting
everyone know in this City his hate and DISRESPECT to not only the Respondent
but the extent, he and his Democratic kind are willing to exhaust to prove that
Black and Brown lives don’t matter if any claims comes before their courts and
the further hate and resentment of any in Colored authority.
That Attorney General (Kwame Raoul) is aware of all of the
unlawful racist acts of what State employees are doing but is keeping his head
down and mouth shut so as not to offend or upset his Massa in the Democratic
Political Machine corroborating the fact Negros in the Democratic Party have no
authority over Racist Anglo-Saxons.
1-23-1065
FIRST DIVISION
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Petition
For Review Of The Order
) Of The
Illinois Labor Relations
Petitioner-Appellant ) Board
State Panel
)
)
VS
)
)
ILRB Nos. L-CB-23-004
)
)
The Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel )
Lynne O. Sneed, Charles E. Anderson, Angela )
C. Thomas, Kimberly Faith Stevens, in her )
Official Capacity as Executive Director Of The )
Illinois Labor Relations Board, )
A.T.U Local 241, President Keith Hill; )
)
Respondents-Appellees
15.
Fraud admissibility great
latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57.
where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great
latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts
allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of
inquiry Vigus
V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL.
App. 512.
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action
for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491
N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a
cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as
“fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2)
known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the
other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of
the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
16.
In the Matter of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS 2008 CH 33616
COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY
DIVISION
Cook County judge Fredrenna Lyle FRAUDULENTLY used
her unlawful position to aid and assist in a plethora of criminal acts TRYING
TO HELP Bank Attorneys steal a home in the guise as being in Foreclosure when
the case was DISMISSED June 10, 2010 and AFFIRMED by the Appellate Court Nov. 3,
2011.
A-
That because Lyle wanted to be accepted and an obedient servant
for the Democratic Political Machine pledging her allegiance willing to go to
prison for them signed a number of Court Orders, hereto attached Ex D Briefing
Schedule, Order setting a Hearing for
August 3, 2022, and again in Sept. of 2022, Email as Ex E, F of law firm
complicit in all Criminal Acts and Chief Judge receiving Notice and Knowledge
with other Democrats in Authority kept quiet, and but the Political Machine put
her in the Appellate Court leaving the Johnson Sisters Summary Judgment in
limbo while the case is still open, hereto attached Ex G Notice of
Response et al. to Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC., claiming to bought said
property.
B-
Negros are like Whores/Sellouts and will do anything unlawful
where certain Jewish or other ethnic groups will not do many Blacks will do and
go along with for acceptance or elevation in the Democratic Party in Lyles mind
as long as her crimes are on Black or Brown women nothing will ever happen to
her because the Racist Massas love her.
C-
Police Officer Francoise L.B. Hightower figured
since her mother is a White Woman realizes how White Men Hate Men of Color used
her lies and vicious schemes to embrace all of them thinking she was going to
get a payout from any judgment from IBC Wonder Bread who went bankrupt to
prevent from paying the Defendant & others from a Federal Discrimination
Class Action Lawsuit or from the CTA where the CTA owes him 29 years of Back
Pay because he is still a CTA employee since March 1987 but was never
reinstated from a work-related injury Dec 1, 1994 everybody has been trying to
steal from him ever since he left her along but she has been a STALKER FROM
HELL coming after him for money he never owed her but her daughter is her
BIOLOGICAL FATHERS CHILD., so in her pathetic sick mind she is trying to punish
him for leaving her along it was her who stated that her father was in love
with her and wanted her to have a baby but claimed to have loved the Defendant
and wanted him to marry her flee to Paris with her grandmother helping her
escape her father, Her father bragged how all of his daughters had “Good
Pussy” in a Braggadocio manner making it clear he was sleeping with them in
front of her and her mother, Defendant did the right thing and moved on with
his life but Francoise and her army of Reprobated Demons are still trying to
bully and intimidate him and use terrorists tactics to try and take from him monies
that none of them will ever have.
D-
Hereto attached June 24, 2022 email from Byron Thompson of
Potestivo & Assoc validating the verity of numerous attorneys acting as “Private
Citizens” on a closed case, that July 19, 2022 emails sent to Acting Presiding
Judge Sophia Hall, States Attorney, Chief Judge and Cook County President
corroborates that Blacks as Democrats are mere Puppets Political Slaves with no
authority over Corrupt Racist Caucasians
U.S. Bank National Association,
As Trustee Under)
Pooling and Servicing Agreement
Dated as of )
December 1, 2006 Mastr
Asset–Backed Securities )
Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage
Pass-Through ) Case # 2008 CH
33616
Certificates, Series
2006-NC3 )
)
Petitioners
)
)
V.
) Judge Freddrenna Lyles
)
) Room 2808
)
Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A
Monzella )
Johnson;
Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia
Johnson:
Mortgage Electronic Registration
)
Systems, Inc. As Nominee for
New Century )
Mortgage Corporation; Monzella
Y. Johnson )
( C ) Cestui Que Trust;
Discover Bank; )
Unknown Owners and Non-Record
Claimants, )
Respondents )
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1)
General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is
an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819,
537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to
the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe
inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest
of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time
of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending
culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
6. The Local Rules provide detailed
instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions
and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must
include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party
contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a
judgment as a matter of law."
This statement of material facts
"shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific
references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting
materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing
summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of
material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each
numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of
any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the
record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very
clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the
moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of
the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
In the matter
of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7th Cir. 2013) ) The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and
considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure,
particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the
failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See,
e.g., id at 611.
7. That the Defendant has met and exceeded the burden required in Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require
plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as
short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules,
the Court instructed plaintiffs to set out each judicial proceeding complained
of, allege specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or
otherwise improper, and name the particular judges and other individuals
involved and the extent of their involvement in each claim of
"fraudulent" or otherwise improper conduct.
8. That
because of the color of said Defendant’s skin State Employees nor Democratic
judges deem him a United States citizen entitled to Equal Protection of the
Laws and is violating every area of the laws egregiously as if they are Ku Klux
Klan members.
9. That Former States Attorney Anita Alvarez via her John Ouska,
Assistant States Attorney stood above the fray and never ever colluded with the
“Private Citizens” of the Democratic Party but mostly all of the Negros,
African Americans acted as INFERIOR BEINGS went along with everything the
racist Democrats directed them to do is why the Defendant is having to
due-diligently defend himself.
10. “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the
Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in
acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts
of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support
the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of
Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged
in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the
Constitution, then his orders are void, In
re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and
he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
11. That
the recent ruling from Judge Sykes and Michael S. Kanne where former appointed
Trump Amy Barrett stated: ( ALL REPUBLICANS)
Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million Jury Verdict
Against City in Shooting Incident
Wednesday,
February 24, 2021 Julie
Tappendorf
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a
jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7 million in damages
relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.
According to the court opinion, the plaintiff claimed that
a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an argument when the two had
been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain and other injuries. The
friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the shooting, arguing that
the City was responsible for the officer's conduct. Specifically, the plaintiff
claimed that the City's failure to have an "early warning system" to
identify officers who might engage in misconduct, failure to adequately investigate
and discipline officers who engage in misconduct, and the "code of
silence" among police officers contributed to the shooting incident. The
City argued that the officer was off duty and not acting under "color of
state law" at the time of the shooting, so the City was not liable under
Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. The case made its way to a jury which
found the City of Chicago liable and awarded $44.7 million in damages to the
plaintiff. The jury found that two of the City's policies - its failure to
maintain an adequate early warning system and failure to adequately investigate
and discipline officers - caused the officer to shoot his friend.
The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals,
which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that
although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were
grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the
officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer. The
Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when
a municipality has violated a federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's
federal rights were violated, the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict
against the City of Chicago.
A-
That said Motion establishes with complete
veracity, within the Preponderance of the laws, that said Democrats within the
Democratic Political Machine along with some Republicans have corroborated
violating Section 1983 along with a plethora of other Terrorists Acts as
Judges, Mayors, States Attorneys, Attorney Generals and numerous officers of
the courts, kept their eyes closed and mouths shut of the noted crimes recorded
within said Motion; thereby, warranting this matter to be transferred out of
the TERRORIST CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE of the DEMOCRATIC CONTROLLED POLITICAL
MACHINE to another Tribunal away from CHICAGO.
1.) That pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60 Relief from a Judgment or Order:
(a) Corrections: Based on
Clerical Mistakes: Oversights and Omissions. The court may correct a clerical mistake
arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order,
or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with
or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court
and while it is pending, such a mistake maybe corrected only with the appellate
courts leave.
(b) Grounds for Relief from a
Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its
legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the
following reasons:
(1) Mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) Newly discovered evidence
that, with reasonable diligence, could have been discovered in time to move for
a new trial under Rule 59 (b);
(3) Fraud (whether previously
called intrinsic or extrinsic ), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an
opposing party;
(4) The judgment is void.
Plaintiff’s have not raised any affirmative defenses.
Summary judgment is appropriate when the
pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most
favorable to the movant or non-movant fail to establish a genuine issue of
material fact, thereby
1. Entitling
the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.
The purpose of summary judgment is not to try
a question of fact, but simply
to
Determine whether one exists.
When the party moving for summary judgment
supplies evidentiary facts which,
If not contradicted, would entitle him
to judgment, the opposing party cannot
Rely upon his complaint or answer alone
to raise issues of material fact. A counter
Affidavit is necessary to refute
evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit
Supporting the motion or else the facts
are deemed admitted.
Here, Defendant has supplied affidavits,
Certified Court transcripts and other evidentiary material that establishes all
of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery under the parties’
agreements, including the amount of damages. Plaintiffs have failed to submit
any evidence in opposition to the Motion or Order to raise any genuine issues
of material fact. Thus, summary judgment is proper.
That
because of the heinous acts Plaintiff have been harmed by said Civil Rights
Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before any tribunal,
Plaintiff is seeking $50 Million
Dollars as punitive damages; Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct.
1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)
Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages
for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here,
where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is
also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that
actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the
deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for
those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for
liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is
no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the
court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breed disrespect
for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of
the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody
Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, it invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
Under Federal law which is applicable to all
states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without
authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not
voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to
a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all
persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in
law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet.
328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not have
jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge
without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in
treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him
any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state officer as in this
case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a
private individual (in his person).
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
Joe Louis Lawrence
__________________ NOTARY
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Respondent respectfully Prays for the Relief
1. For
an Order Granting Summary Judgment Instanter for a JUDGMENT
of $50 Million Dollars.
2. For
an Order issuing a Rule to Show Cause Remanding all parties complicit
in this “Organized Conspiracy” into Custody Instanter.
3. For an
Order appointing a Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their
profession to investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these
Terrorist Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;
4. For an
Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties noted within due to
the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens” perpetrating roles as
judges, States Attorneys, State Agencies etc Trespassing upon the Laws”
5. For an
Order on bond be not less than one million dollars for any and all parties
charged in these crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.
6. For an
Order removing the Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all
Circuits who as Public Servants failed to investigate remove or report any
judge in accordance to their oath and Public Duty.
7. For an
Order setting a Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and
did not exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and
speak up or report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens”
violating their oaths as judges, State Employees, Cook County Clerks and
Attorneys.
8. For the
entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other
relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court
may deem overwhelmingly just;
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
_____________________ .
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
NOTICE OF
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS/FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES ACTING AS
“PRIVATE CITIZENS” COMPLICIT IN THIS CHILD SUPPORT SCAM OF ILLINOIS CRIMINAL
ENTERPRISE FRAUDULENTLY FALSIFYING COURT DOCUMENTS CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE
REMANDED INTO CUSTODY 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT AND THE CTA NOT
REINSTATING HIM BACK TO WORK BECAUSE THEY DESTROYED HIS EMPLOYMENT RECORDS
TRYING TO COVER-UP JUDGES ALLOWING EXTORTION OF HIS WAGES TO POLICE OFFICER
& JUDGE MANUFACTURING AN UNLAWFUL WARRANT IN THIS CONSPIRACY AND IS SEEKING
$50 MILLION DOLLARS w/AFFIDAVIT
Please be advised that on Dec 4, 2023 Respondent has filed before
this Domestic Relations Division Motion
for Summary Judgment et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument
before Judge Chivira Jan 2, 2024 in her stead at 9:30 am in room via Zoom
Zoom Link
Meeting ID: 84376080114
Password: 086627
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice and Motion to all parties
recorded in said Notice via regular mail/electronic delivery.
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon. Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Francoise L.B. Hightower-Belmer 1152 West
102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353
Cook County State’s Attorney
Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police
isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
Respectfully, Submitted,
__________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago, Ill 60649
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS/FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
|  1:30 PM (7 hours ago) | | ||
| ||||
Hello,
The attachment is the image(s) scanned by ScanEZ Station.
Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment