________________________________________________________________________
STATE OF ILLINOIS
SUPREME COURT
Mary Jane Theis, Chief Justice
Justice P. Scott Neville, Jr. Justice David K. Overstreet
Justice Lisa Holder White Justice Joy V. Cunningham
Justice Elizabeth M. Rochford Justice Mary K. O’Brien
M. R. 27935 –In re: Joseph Preston Harris Disciplinary Commission
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDER OF SUSPENSION INSTANTER DUE TO ERROR “FRAUD” COVER-UP CONSPIRACY OF A.R.D.C. COLLUDING WITH CERTAIN JUDGES IN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES MAKING THE ORDER OF MAY 20, 2016 A NULLITY
_______________________________________________________________________
Now comes Joseph Preston Harris, an Attorney who had been a member of the bar and admitted to practice since November 18, 1965, until said suspension respectfully moves this Honorable Court to enter an Order Reinstating law license Instanter with affidavit in the above-entitled cause.
Reasons in support of this motion are set forth in the attached affidavit.
Respectfully Submitted,
By: ____________________________
Joseph Preston Harris
9808 S. Walden Parkway
Chicago, Illinois 60643
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
AFFIDAVIT
I Joseph Preston Harris, being first duly sworn on oath depose and states as follows:
1.) Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
2.) The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
3.) That Joseph Preston Harris was the Attorney on case 2008 CH 33616 US Bank et al vs Monzella Y. Johnson et al and 13 CH 17994, Federal National Mortgage Association
4.) That the Writ of Mandamus et al. filed Jan 26, 2023 Case# 129343 having particularized all facts recorded in said affidavits as Gr Ex. B.
a. Clerks nor Officers of the court have no jurisdiction ignored and obstructed justice demonstrating Prejudice and Bias behavior pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-----1001 (a) (3); Sup. Ct. Rule 63 (C) (1), by making sure said Motions never was presented to the SEVEN JUSTICES in the ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT.
b. To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
c. A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
5.) That on Jan. 26, 2023, Appellant filed her MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUPERVISORY ORDER and said Motion was never allegedly docketed in the database.
6.) That on Feb 8, 2023, Ref as Ex A Appellant received an email from an alleged Clerk or Officer of the Court a TYPED LETTER “TODAY THE FOLLOWING ORDER WAS ENERED IN THE CAPTIONED CASE”
A- That Ex A had no CERTIFICATION or NAMES OF ANY JUDGES in ATTENDENCE on the Order.
7.) That on Feb. 8, 2023 only after calling (217) 782-8132 and was connected to Matthew Rousey he provided his email and emailed an Order FILE STAMPED Feb 8, 2023 Ref as Ex B, not CERTIFIED nor the NAMES OF ANY JUDGES IN ATTENDENCE.
8.) That the Feb 27, 2023 Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration et al. filed Feb 27, 2023, as Gr Ex. C, that Page 6, Par 16, “That Gr Ex J (filed June 25, 2015) prepared by Gr Ex H, Defendant’s responses to Plaintiff’s Global Motions and Request to Reconsider prior judgments.” Is why said attorneys’ character was assassinated and suspended to cover-up the fraudulent acts of Judge Otto allowing the attorneys of Pierce & Associates attorneys come in to the court and commit fraud on the court and not one person was investigated or suspended.
A- That the court order the Honorable Judges signed suspending said license from 2013PR00114 had a case 1998 CH 0127 is no such case and 1998 CH 00127 was never a case assigned to him.
B- That Group Exhibits D and E articulates prima facie showing of State Agencies engaging in egregious criminal racist acts against African Americans and Latino citizens as someone in the Supreme Court is helping them cover-up the crimes by preventing the courts from seeing the cases.
9.) That Ex H and Ex I as it relates to Ex G articulates in a detailed manner as the attorney with client was before Judge Mullins not Judge Otto April 23, 2014, but the court records were deleted from the database to cover-up the fact Judge Mullins was ever on the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment