UPDATE JUNE 21, 2022 PER ZOOM HEARING WITH JUDGE LYLE PLEASE FIND THE ARGUMENT READ ON ZOOM
Good Morning Your Honor:
I am here on my Motions---- For the record we filed the motions Motion to Strike/Object et al April 25, 2022 and Motion for Summary Judgment June 2, 2022.
Before we address the issues at hand
It is imperative we attacked the March 15, 2022 Court Order before discussing the Strike Motion, the Computer shows that the attorney never provided us Notice and the court never notified us of any Hearing as in prior court hearings letting us know the case was on the call as of recent we received an email Wednesday at 9:00 am June 15 for this matter today.
On the Court Order it says the Movant shall mail a copy to the last known address within 7 days.
To further demonstrate disrespect and Fraud for the Court and Violation of our civil Rights as Black women, the attorney mailed the 3-15 court order from Metroplex Michigan on April 20, 2022 in the PM and we received it April 22, 2022 35 days later.
It does not show on the database that the attorneys were in fact before the judge via zoom or in person for March 15, 2022
But the Court Order does not have the Clerk of the Circuit Court stamp on it. It is clear from these actions the attorneys do not and will not honor the rules of this court and will never respect your authority as a BLACK JUDGE.
We need to address how can we move forward on
this case when nobody is following the laws except for the Defendants (us) ?
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App.
1 Dist. 1983 The
Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
#JUDGELYLE CUT THE DEFENDANT OFF WHEN SHE STARTED THE SENTENCE "TO PREVAIL IN A CAUSE OF ACTION" AND SAID THAT SHE READ THE MOTIONS AND DID NOT NEED HER TO READ HER ARGUMENT BECAUSE SHE IS AWARE OR KNOW THE LAWS AND REQUESTED THE ATTORNEY TO RESPOND (MAI POULAMI )
THE CASE WAS CALLED AT ABOUT 10:55 AND BECAUSE OF THE POWERFUL INTRODUCTION AND SO MANY TUNED IN ON THE ZOOM HEARING 312 626-6799, MEETING ID#952-2965-4132, PASSWORD IF APPLICABLE 699279.
THE ATTORNEY TRIED TO EXPLAIN THAT SHE WITNESSED A NON-ATTORNEY MAILING OUT THE JUDGES COURT ORDER FROM THE STATE OF MICHIGAN WHEN IN FACT, THEY NEVER MAILED ANYTHING TIMELY SO AS TO JUSTIFY TRYING TO TRICK THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS INTO TRYING TO EVICT THEM FROM THEIR HOME ILLEGALLY IN AN ATTEMPT TO STEAL THEIR HOME.
BECAUSE COUNSEL WAS NOT ABLE TO OVERCOME THE MERITS OF THE ARGUMENT FROM THE DEFENDANT, JUDGE LYLE PASSED THE CASE AND MADE IT THE VERY LAST CASE TO BE CALLED AND THE CASE WAS NOT OVER UNTIL 12:50 0R 55.
JUDGE LYLE WHO HAS NO JURISDICTION ON THIS CASE BECAUSE #JUDGEGILLESPIEDISMISSEDTHISFORECLOSUREJUNE102010 AND THE APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMED HER VERDICT, BECAUSE THE POLITICAL MACHINE COULD NOT FIND A CAUCASIAN JUDGE WILLING TO GO ALONG WITH THEM STEALING AN INNOCENT AFRICAN AMERICAN'S HOME ESPECIALLY SENIOR CITIZENS.
LYLE WAS SPECIFICALLY RECRUITED TO DO THE HONORS AND DESECRATE ALL LAWS AND DEMONSTRATE TO THE FBI AND EVERYONE READING THIS POST HOW CERTAIN JUDGES DESCRIBED AS NIGGERS, THUGS DOMESTIC TERRORISTS ACTUALLY STEAL HOMES AND ARE PROTECTED BY OTHER CORRUPT JUDGES.
LYLE ASKED #POULAMI THE CORRUPT ATTORNEY WHO IS DEMONSTRATING AS A BLACK WOMAN, SHE IS WILLING TO DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO PROTECT RACIST WHITE MEN INTERTWINED IN THIS DIABOLICAL #MORTGAGEFRAUD PLOT OF STEALING PEOPLE OF COLOR HOMES, HOW MUCH TIME DO SHE NEEDS TO REPLY TO THE MOTION STRIKING/OBJECTING? THE ATTORNEY SEEM TO HAVE BEEN TAKEN BACK IN SURPRISE REPLIED 7 DAYS (LAUGHING MY ASS OFF) SHE THINKS SHE CAN RESPOND TO A 246 PAGE DOCUMENT IN 7 DAYS, THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY CAUCASIAN EVER TO RESPOND TO ANY DOCUMENT EVER FILED IN ANY COURT.
SO LYLE ASKED THE DEFENDANT HOW MUCH TIME SHE NEEDS TO REPLY TO THEIR RESPONSE? HER REPLY WAS 14 DAYS.
PEOPLE NEED TO BE VERY CAREFUL VOTING FOR CERTAIN BLACK JUDGES, THEIR ARE SOME GOOD ONES BUT READ UP ON JUDGES AND I DON'T THINK NO JUDGE WHO IS A FORMER ALDERMAN UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULLD EVER BE A JUDGE OR ANY ATTORNEY WHO MAY HAVE BEEN THE SUBJECT TO COMPLAINTS BY THE ARDC, SEE HOW CORRUPT ATTORNEYS INTERTWINED IN THESE CORRUPT PROCEEDINGS ARE ALLOWED TO PRACTICE LAWS AS LONG AS THEY ARE DESTROYING THE BLACK COMMUNITIES.
THIS IS THE COURT ORDER THAT JUDGE LYLE IS TO SIGN FURTHER DEMONSTRATING HER ROLE IN THIS TERRORIST CONSPIRACY, THEY FORGOT TO PUT IN THE ORDER THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILL BE HEARD AFTER THE HEARING OF BRIEFED MOTIONS AND REPLIES.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT – CHANCERY DIVISION
#USBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER POOLING AND
SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED AS OF DECEMBER 1, 2006 MASTR ASSET-
BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-NC3
Plaintiff
Case No. 08 CH 33616
v.
MONZELLA YOHANUS JOHNSON A/K/A MONZELLA JOHNSON; MARCIA ESSIE
JOHNSON A/K/A MARCIA JOHNSON; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC, AS NOMINEE FOR NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION;
MONZELLA YOHANUS, JOHNSON (C) CESTUI QUE TRUST; DISCOVER BANK;
HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A.; UNKNOWN OWNERS AND NON-RECORD CLAIMANTS
Defendants
Property Address:
5217 South Ingleside Avenue
Chicago, IL 60615
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ORDER
This matter coming to be heard before the Court on Monzella Y. Johnson’s Motion Striking/Objecting
Approving Sale (Court Order being a Void/Nullity) and Distribution et. al. (interpreted as a Motion to Vacate the
Order Approving Sale for not receiving Notice ) counsel for Plaintiff and Monzella Johnson and Marcia Johnson
appearing via Zoom, and the Court being duly advised,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Sale et. al. shall be
briefed and heard as follows:
1. Plaintiff to file their Response within 7 days, on or before June 28, 2022;
2. Defendant to file their Reply 14 days thereafter, on or before July 12, 2022;
4. Hearing on this matter is set for AUGUST 3, 2022 at 11:00 am in Courtroom 2804 via Zoom:
Meeting ID: 952 2965 4132
Password: 699279
ENTERED:
Dated: ____________________________
__________________________________
Judge
3. Courtesy copies to be sent via email to ccc.mfmlcalendar56@cookcountyil.gov;
ORDER PREPARED BY:
Alexander B. Potestivo (ARDC#6327455)
Marc Wagman (ARDC#6282192)
Poulami Mal (ARDC#6330071)
Charlotte A. Haack (ARDC#6310785)
Bryan H. Thompson (ARDC#6273155)
223 W Jackson Blvd., Suite 610
Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone: 312-263-0003
Main Fax: 312-263-0002
Cook County Firm ID #: 43932
DuPage County Firm ID #: 223623
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ilpleadings@potestivolaw.com
Our File No.: 113025
#MONZELLAJOHNSON & #MARCIAJOHNSON
THIS IS WHY STRANGERS CAN MOVE INTO PEOPLES HOMES AND/OR STEAL THEM BECAUSE SO MANY JUDGES AND ALDERMAN ARE IN ON THIS SOPHISTICATED SCAM AND THE POLICE CAN'T HELP YOU.
IT IS SAD BUT MOST OF THE CRIMINALS ARE JUDGES AND IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND VERY FEW IN LAW ENFORCEMENT OR WITHIN THE LAWS SEEM TO BE SMART ENOUGH OR HAVE THE COMPETENT QUALIFICATIONS TO REALLY FIGURE OUT WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON BECAUSE THE #CRIMINALENTERPRISE OF COOK COUNTY IS ENTRENCHED IN RACISM, HATRED, SELF-HATRED AND #CORRUPTION
Chicago woman says stranger moved into vacant Chatham home, refuses to leave
Danielle Cruz said she was proud when she bought this home and even prouder after renovating it. She was excited to sell it. But a stranger moved right in. When she called police, they told her there wasn't much they can do.
No comments:
Post a Comment