A WAR HAS BEEN DECLARED ON PEOPLE OF COLOR IN ILLINOIS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE COURTS AND NOBODY BLACK OR BROWN IN POWER OR AUTHORITY IS ADDRESSING THIS PROBLEM CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN?

PUTIN HAS DECLARED WAR ON THE UKRAINIAN CITIZENS AS AMERICA AND OTHER ALLIES ARE COMING TOGETHER TO SANCTION HIM FOR THIS HEINOUS ACT BUT IN AMERICA, CHICAGO LEGAL SYSTEM THERE IS A WAR ON BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE.

1.)  THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS COMPRISED OF MEMBERS OF THE RACIST FRATERNAL CLUBS, THEY HAVE TAKEN OFF THE WHITE ROBES AND ARE WEARING SUITS AND CARRYING GUNS.

2.)  READ HOW THE WAR IN CHICAGO IS NO DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THE PEOPLE IN UKRAINE ARE GOING THROUGH ONLY WE ARE EXPERIENCING A PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR ON AMERICAN SOIL AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT THIS BECAUSE RACISM IS ACCEPTED AND TOLERATED BY SO MANY.

3.)  MOST BLACK LEADERS IN THE POLITICAL MACHINE ARE LIKENED TO BEING "POLITICAL SLAVES" THEY ARE IMPOTENT IN POWER AND ARE ONLY APPOINTED OR ENDORSED FOR THE POSITIONS BECAUSE OF THEIR INABILITY TO SPEAK UP ON RACIAL ISSUES, CONDONE OR RIDICULE THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS, IN MANY INSTANCES THESE TYPE OF COLORED PEOPLE ARE QUICK TO WANT TO BE ACCEPTED BY THESE RACIST HATEFUL INDIVIDUALS, THEY WOULD DO WHATEVER, THEY ARE TOLD BY CLOSING THEIR EYES TO MULTITUDES OF RACIAL INJUSTICES.

4.)  THE ONLY MAN WHO OPENED HIS MOUTH AND SPOKE UP ABOUT THE JUDGES WAS POLICE CHIEF DAVID BROWN AND HE TOLD THE TRUTH.

5.)  MANY ARE GOING TO LEARN AND REALIZE A LOT OF PEOPLE APPOINTED OR ELECTED TO MANY POSITIONS ARE NOT THAT INTELLIGENT BECAUSE SO MANY HAVE EITHER CHEATED, LIED, PAYED OR ENGAGED IN SEXUAL FAVORS TO RECEIVE THEIR POSITIONS, IT IS THOSE VERY PEOPLE WHO HATE ANY PERSON OF COLOR WHO IS EITHER ACADEMIC ENOUGH TO FULLY ASCERTAIN AND SPEAK UP ABOUT THE WRONGS THESE PERSONS ARE ENGAGING IN.

6.)  THESE VERY ANGLO-SAXONS CALLED WHITE PEOPLE HAVE A "IMPLICIT BIAS" ON ALL BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS COMING BEFORE THE COURTS DEFENDING THEMSELVES WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THEM.    

    A- BECAUSE OF THE INFERIOR NATURE OF SO MANY BLACKS IN POWER, THE "IMPLICIT BIAS" OF THE AFOREMENTIONED ANGLO-SAXONS IS THAT ALL BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS ARE LIKE THE OTHER NIGGERS (NEGROES) SO WHAT HAPPENS AS A GROUP AND RACE OF PEOPLE ARE BEING SUBJECTED TO GENOCIDE, DISPLACEMENT FROM THE WORK FORCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE, ALL SORTS OF DISPARATE APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS, STEALING HOMES, STEALING WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION OF INJURED AND DISABLED PEOPLE, INCARCERATING INNOCENT MEN FOR CHILD SUPPORT, THEY NEVER OWED ETC.

7.)  THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT IS OF 33 PAGES, BUT I AM ONLY GOING TO SUBMIT 5 OR 6 PAGES AND WILL UPLOAD THE OTHER DOCUMENTS LATER

   A- THIS MOTION WAS FILED DEC. 2, 2021, BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDGE, DIANE SYKES

MOTION TO ASCERTAIN HOW FEDERAL JUDGE DIANE S. SYKES HAVE JURISDICTION OR ANY JUDGE IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, WHEN SHE HAS ADMITTED BEING A DE FACTO ATTORNEY, ADMITTED TO CORROBORATING IN A PLETHORA OF CRIMINAL TERRORIST CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS USING HER ROBE AND UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY OBSTRUCTING SAID CASE FROM BEING TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 26 PURSUANT TO THE BREYERS COMMITTEE REPORT, 239 F.R.D. AT 214-15. COURT ORDER BEING A NULLITY

   B- BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUDGE WAS NOT ABLE TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO THE MOTION INTELLIGENTLY, SHE DENIED IT IMMEDIATELY!

THE COURT OF APPEALS HAD JUDGES DIANE P. WOOD, AMY J. ST. EVE AND MICHAEL J. SCUDDER TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT SAYING THEY HAD NO JURISDICTION BECAUSE THE CASE WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS FILED 2 DAYS LATE

   A- THAT WAS A BIG LIE, SO ON THE OTHER COURT ORDER A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE WAS ENTERED TO EXPLAIN WHAT THE CHIEF JUDGE COULD NOT EXPLAIN IS WHY THE CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED IN 14 DAYS. 

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

 

Monzella Y. Johnson                                                 } Appeal from the United

Plaintiffs –Appellant                                                   } States District Court for

                                                                                   } the Northern District of

} Illinois, Eastern Division

V                                                                                 }

No. 21-2905                                                               }

                                                                                   } No. 1:21-cv-02707

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                }

As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust                            }

2006-NC3, et al.                                                         }

Defendant-Appellees                                                 }  Judge Gary Feinerman

                                                                                 

 

RESPONSE TO RULE TO SHOW CAUSE  FOR APPELLANT  #2

 

 

 

 

                                                                                     Respectfully submitted,

                                                                                _________________________

                                                                                  Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se

                                                                                         5217 S. Ingleside Ave

                                                                                        Chicago, Il 60615

                                                                                          

“No one is above the Law”,  citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),

“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."         

 

NOW COMES the Appellant, Monzella Y. Johnson (Plaintiff), hereby respectfully Moves this court with corroboration, affidavits, unimpeached Summary Judgments from all law firms associated in this matter where court transcripts have been provided with prior Motion for Reconsideration due to “Fraud” & Misrepresentations to the court with all attachments {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedures} Demonstrating why said Appeal should not be dismissed.:

 

1.)  That the court order of March 1^st, 2022 where Judges Diane P. Wood, Michael Y. Scuddder, Amy J. St. Eve egregiously erred, order states, “In this case judgment was entered on September 2, 2021, and the notice of appeal was filed on October 6, 2021, two days late.”

 

A-   “IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction”.

That Petitioner prepared a Jurisdictional Statement (Oct 18, 2021)pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60 Relief from a Judgment or Order:

(a)  Corrections: Based on Clerical Mistakes: Oversights and Omissions. The court may correct a clerical mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court and while it is pending, such a mistake maybe corrected only with the appellate courts leave.

 

(b)  Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the following reasons:

 

 

(1)  Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;

 

(2)  Newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59 (b);

 

 

(3)  Fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic ), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;

 

(4)  The judgment is void.    

 

 

Order entered: June 30, 2021, September 2, 2021, September 20, 2021

Notice of Appeal filed: July 8, 2021, September 10, 2021, Oct 6, 2021, Amended Notice of Appeal filed Oct 18, 2021, due to clerk not knowing of September 20, Court Order was a FINAL ORDER

 

Statutes: Democratic Judges violating United States Supreme Court Rulings, Judge Feinerman Ordered Clerks to return Notice of Appeal, Enforcing “Jim Crow Laws” “Trespassing upon the Laws” “No Jurisdiction on case, Order being Void a “Nullity” Obstruction of Justice ” Committing Fraud, Engaging in Treason Like Offenses, Judges Committing Perjury, Judges aiding and abetting in a Criminal Conspiracy, Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Judge acting outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, as “Private Citizens” outlawed by the United States Supreme Court  as they used their robes and jurisdiction to aid and assist Terrorist Democratic Judges and Public Officials in covering-up Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Racial Hate Crimes, Slander and Defamation of Character, Civil Rights Violations, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies by Democrats, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations, Violation of Canon Ethics : A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. Canon 2: A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities. Canon 3: A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

   Plaintiff is appealing to the  Court of Appeals, for a Reversal Sanctions and Remand with instructions notifying Federal authorities based on the foregoing stated above:

   Plaintiff has Due-Diligently been fighting to keep their home from unlawfully being stolen from them in the disguise as foreclosure before the Supreme Court of Illinois, District Court and  Court of Appeals for over 13 years racist political judges appointed by Alderman Edward Burke have systematically “Trespassed upon the Laws” entering Orders that are “VOID” a “NULLITY” pursuant to the laws of the United States Supreme Court as judges used their robes and unlawful authority to maintain a Democratic “Lynching” of the laws on the Appellants as senior citizens in that every Black and Brown person in the Democratic Party kept their mouths shut because they are powerless over Anglo Saxon men in the Democratic Party and they are only figureheads.

   Plaintiff is appealing to the  Court of Appeals, because Anglo Saxon judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored that they were the victims of an “Organized Conspiracy” perpetrated by Democratic judges acting as “Private Citizens” controlling the Criminal Enterprise in all of the courts controlled by Democrats, in that Judge Feinerman closed his eyes to all Terrorist Treason offenses accompanied by an affidavit unimpeached by every attorney.

 

“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value, unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3 Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).

 

A-     That while case was on Appeal where Notice was filed September 10, 2021, hereto attached, Document #34 validating the verity of proper fee being paid with receipt number.

 

B-     That Deputy Clerk Roberto Cornejo mailed to all parties that a Notice of Appeal had been filed, hereto attached, September 14, 2021.

 

C-     That Judge Feinerman allegedly received a HEFTY PAYMENT from U.S. Bank entered an UNLAWFUL COURT ORDER and emailed the United States District Court Financial Department, Fiscal Department (DAJ) hereto attached, ORDERING THE CLERK TO VIOLATE PLAINTIFF’S CIVIL RIGHTS BY RETURN the Notice of Appeal and Jurisdictional Statement.

 

D-     That Judge Feinerman recruited other RACIST PERSONNEL (Manager of Docketing Department Jim) to verbally dispatch him to provide false information to Court of Appeals Clerks where a Clerk gave the name of Steve and file stamped Motions Motion for Reimbursement of Unlawful Sanctions et al. and Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Court Transcripts et al.

 

E-     That certain RACIST CLERKS filled with HATE, DELETED THE ENTIRE record from the DATABASE and returned the said motions by recording the false court number 2264 on the document, but the clerk identified himself as a Steve but initials GW is recorded on the documents, U.S. Marshalls and Court Security would verify that on the day said document was filed video would show Joe Louis had the documents filed and the clerk who received the documents was not a Steve.

 

F-     That at no time did any clerk on the 24^th of September did anyone mention any outstanding filing fees were in fact due.

 

G-     That said HISTORY retrieved from the database on the 20^th floor indicates that said record was transmitted (Sept. 14, 2021) but was never acknowledged because it was DELETED from the COURT OF APPEALS DATABASE, hereto attached.

 

H-     To further CORROBORATE and DEMONSTRATE the gravity of this TERRORIST CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE Judge Feinerman ENGINEERED the MAIL FRAUD OF someone mailing to the Plaintiff a CHECK FROM THE U.S. TREASURY “21 CV 2707 REFUND #35 FALSE STATEMENTS TO A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TO OBTAIN A LOAN”.

 

I-       That on Oct 4, 2021 Joe Louis accompanied retired sister Police Officer Ms. Johnson seeking Greg and was met by Clerk S. said name will not be revealed because he was never in any way racist  or a part of said Terrorist Conspiracy, stated no Greg works here, but was very helpful and provided the documents, Jim was dispatching to him verbally on the phone, hereto attached, case 18-1051 and 21-2264, but when Ms. Johnson requested the name of the woman appeared as a Supervisor as she was making copies demonstrating fees had been paid, her venomous reply was that, she don’t give out her name, so it’s not difficult to ascertain or recognize the RACIST HATEFUL PEOPLE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, they are all complicit in this “TERRORIST CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY”

 

J-       That on Oct. 5, 2021 Sara the Supervisor who have demonstrated tremendous integrity in this matter informed her that,  they are returning the Notice of Appeal and the check because the Court of Appeals is not accepting the record.  

K-     That Judge Feinerman had knowledge affidavits of Defendant US Bank being served via Registered Agent said Judge entered an ORDER, May 21, 2021, “Initial Status Hearing” July 19,2021 at 9:15 am, “Initial Status Report” shall be filed by July 12, 2021”.

 

L-     Plaintiff filed a Motion to Disqualify Judge Gary Feinerman and all Northern District Judges and Seventh Circuit Judges Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and 9(b); {28 USCA 144 (b) (1)} Filed Jun 7, 2021, Judge Feinerman became a “Private Citizen” entered an order where Defendant never Denied or Objected to any of the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “Motion to disqualify judge is denied. “Plaintiff does not set forth legitimate grounds for Disqualifying District Judge Feinerman”.  (DENIED June 10, 2021).

 

M-    That Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures w/ Affidavit June 16, 2021. Judge Feinerman became a “Private Citizen” (after Defendant admitted to all of the Pleadings of Judges colluding with them in said “Criminal Organized Conspiracy”) DENIED June 22, 2021, “the Summary Judgment, Motion for Summary Judgment is denied for failure to comply with Local Rule 56.1. The Motion hearing set for 7/19/2021 is stricken.”

 

N-     That Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration due to Fraud & Misrepresentations to the court Vacate all Judgments due to Democratic Judges entering orders being “VOID” A “NULLITY” case being “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TRESON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”, June 28, 2021, Judge Feinerman demonstrated and corroborated his Racist Bias animus hatred at the Plaintiffs, DENIED said Motion, “Motion for reconsideration is denied. Plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought on the motion”. (Denied June 30, 2021)

 

O-     That on May 20, 2021, 14:06 hours US Bank was SERVED CERTIFIED MAIL ON REGISTERED AGENT Pamela Ferguson signed for the document  tracking number 7019-1170-0001-0285-1637.

 

P-      That PROOF OF SERVICE WAS FILED and DOCKETED May 24, 2021 and a Copy was set aside for the judge via the Clerks delivery.

 

Q-     That said Judge Feinerman has demonstrated unequivocally using his robe and jurisdiction to racially OPPRESS, LYNCH INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR, AS IF THEY WERE ROPES, DOGS OR WATERHOSES BY APPLYING UNLAWFUL APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS IN AN TYRANNICAL TERRORIST MANNER, not fearing any retributions because of his fraternal brethren in the Seventh Circuit, allegedly will DENY ANY DOCUMENT Pro Se’s or individuals of color who presents valid legal claims before that circuit they will be SYSTEMATICALLY DISMISSED.   

 

R-    That Plaintiff and other innocent Litigants of color cases seem to have appeared before JUDGES ALLEGEDLY DESCRIBED AS MEMBERS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, NAZI FRATERNAL ORDER OR WHITE NATIONALIST MEMBERS who are systematically ORCHESTRATING THE VIOLENCE RACISM AND CORRUPTION IN THIS CITY AND STATE as outlined in the aforementioned history of cases.

 

S-     “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”         

 

T-     That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. Plaintiff complied with said rule but the court was a law unto himself.

 

U-     Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017)  Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about the treatment of such litigants.

A-   “The basic thing is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of a federal judge,” Posner said.

In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.

Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.

Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.

FROM PAGE 15 AND 16

1.)  That Petitioner filed the appropriate motion Dec. 2, 2021, before Chief Judge Diane S. Sykes, Motion to Ascertain how Federal judge Diane S. Sykes have Jurisdiction or any judge in the Seventh Circuit, when she has admitted being a DE FACTO ATTORNEY ET AL.

A-   How can a Judge ignore the law and rule in accordance to their personal HATRED OR BIASNESS and at the same time create an error in their court order saying they don’t have jurisdiction and DISMISS this case?

 

B-   Said judge received said motion Dec. 2, 2021, and DENIED the motion Dec. 6, 2021 and stated, “but any further vexatious motions will be returned unfiled”

 

C-   But Petitioner is under a COURT ORDER RESPONSE TO RULE TO SHOW CAUSE, to ANSWER THE SAME QUESTION DIRECTED TO THE COURT, SHE COULD NOT ANSWER SO SHE DENIED THE MOTION”.

 

D-   Rather than transfer the case out of the SEVENTH CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 26, Judges Diane P. Wood, Amy St. Eve along with Scudder who was aware all along that Petitioner was TRUTHFUL with her PLEADINGS, when he was with Judge Easterbrook and Kanne, so he decided to violate Canon Ethics and RPC 3.3, by going along with what can be described as a DELIBERATE ERROR or RACIST CONSPIRACY to justify DISMISSING a VALID COMPLAINT by embracing RACISM and HATE using his robe to LYNCH SAID PETITIONER WITH UNJUST LAWS BECAUSE OF HER  SKIN COLOR..  

 

Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigan (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505

 

2.)  Special Agent Emmerson Buie, Jr. stated, "It demonstrates how far the reach of corruption can go," FBI Chicago Special Agent-in-Charge Emmerson Buie Jr. said. Madigan steered favorable legislation for ComEd and also swayed lawmakers, prosecutors said”.

 

3.)   U.S. Attorney John Lausch announced Wednesday that a federal grand jury returned the indictment on Wednesday. Madigan is accused of using his official position to solicit personal financial gains for himself and his associates. Madigan served as state representative representing the 22nd state House District; committeeman for the 13th Ward in Chicago – a position he still holds; chairman of the Illinois Democratic Party and the 13th Ward Democratic Organization, and a partner at the Chicago law firm Madigan & Getzendanner. The charges said Madigan and his “Madigan Enterprise” abused these positions for personal gain. The indictment claims that Madigan directed the activities of his longtime confidant Michael McClain, who in turn carried out illegal activities at the behest of Madigan. McClain is charged as a co-defendant in the indictment.

4.)  That in spite of the voices of the top legal entities FBI and United States Attorney, no case or any judge has been presented to the GRAND JURY for the RETURN OF INDICTMENTS for numerous judges and State Employees engaging in various CRIMINAL ENTEPRISES conspiring with many Machine Operatives, due to their Communist RussianTerrorist control of the legal democracy in Illinois.

A-   How do we not know said Political Machine is not affiliated with Russians or their affiliates?