A WAR HAS BEEN DECLARED ON PEOPLE OF COLOR IN ILLINOIS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE COURTS AND NOBODY BLACK OR BROWN IN POWER OR AUTHORITY IS ADDRESSING THIS PROBLEM CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN?
PUTIN HAS DECLARED WAR ON THE UKRAINIAN CITIZENS AS AMERICA AND OTHER ALLIES ARE COMING TOGETHER TO SANCTION HIM FOR THIS HEINOUS ACT BUT IN AMERICA, CHICAGO LEGAL SYSTEM THERE IS A WAR ON BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE.
1.) THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS COMPRISED OF MEMBERS OF THE RACIST FRATERNAL CLUBS, THEY HAVE TAKEN OFF THE WHITE ROBES AND ARE WEARING SUITS AND CARRYING GUNS.
2.) READ HOW THE WAR IN CHICAGO IS NO DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THE PEOPLE IN UKRAINE ARE GOING THROUGH ONLY WE ARE EXPERIENCING A PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR ON AMERICAN SOIL AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT THIS BECAUSE RACISM IS ACCEPTED AND TOLERATED BY SO MANY.
3.) MOST BLACK LEADERS IN THE POLITICAL MACHINE ARE LIKENED TO BEING "POLITICAL SLAVES" THEY ARE IMPOTENT IN POWER AND ARE ONLY APPOINTED OR ENDORSED FOR THE POSITIONS BECAUSE OF THEIR INABILITY TO SPEAK UP ON RACIAL ISSUES, CONDONE OR RIDICULE THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS, IN MANY INSTANCES THESE TYPE OF COLORED PEOPLE ARE QUICK TO WANT TO BE ACCEPTED BY THESE RACIST HATEFUL INDIVIDUALS, THEY WOULD DO WHATEVER, THEY ARE TOLD BY CLOSING THEIR EYES TO MULTITUDES OF RACIAL INJUSTICES.
4.) THE ONLY MAN WHO OPENED HIS MOUTH AND SPOKE UP ABOUT THE JUDGES WAS POLICE CHIEF DAVID BROWN AND HE TOLD THE TRUTH.
5.) MANY ARE GOING TO LEARN AND REALIZE A LOT OF PEOPLE APPOINTED OR ELECTED TO MANY POSITIONS ARE NOT THAT INTELLIGENT BECAUSE SO MANY HAVE EITHER CHEATED, LIED, PAYED OR ENGAGED IN SEXUAL FAVORS TO RECEIVE THEIR POSITIONS, IT IS THOSE VERY PEOPLE WHO HATE ANY PERSON OF COLOR WHO IS EITHER ACADEMIC ENOUGH TO FULLY ASCERTAIN AND SPEAK UP ABOUT THE WRONGS THESE PERSONS ARE ENGAGING IN.
6.) THESE VERY ANGLO-SAXONS CALLED WHITE PEOPLE HAVE A "IMPLICIT BIAS" ON ALL BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS COMING BEFORE THE COURTS DEFENDING THEMSELVES WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THEM.
A- BECAUSE OF THE INFERIOR NATURE OF SO MANY BLACKS IN POWER, THE "IMPLICIT BIAS" OF THE AFOREMENTIONED ANGLO-SAXONS IS THAT ALL BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS ARE LIKE THE OTHER NIGGERS (NEGROES) SO WHAT HAPPENS AS A GROUP AND RACE OF PEOPLE ARE BEING SUBJECTED TO GENOCIDE, DISPLACEMENT FROM THE WORK FORCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE, ALL SORTS OF DISPARATE APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS, STEALING HOMES, STEALING WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION OF INJURED AND DISABLED PEOPLE, INCARCERATING INNOCENT MEN FOR CHILD SUPPORT, THEY NEVER OWED ETC.
7.) THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT IS OF 33 PAGES, BUT I AM ONLY GOING TO SUBMIT 5 OR 6 PAGES AND WILL UPLOAD THE OTHER DOCUMENTS LATER
A- THIS MOTION WAS FILED DEC. 2, 2021, BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDGE, DIANE SYKES
MOTION TO ASCERTAIN HOW FEDERAL JUDGE DIANE S. SYKES HAVE
JURISDICTION OR ANY JUDGE IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, WHEN SHE HAS ADMITTED BEING A
DE FACTO ATTORNEY, ADMITTED TO CORROBORATING IN A PLETHORA OF CRIMINAL
TERRORIST CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS USING HER ROBE AND UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY
OBSTRUCTING SAID CASE FROM BEING TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE
26 PURSUANT TO THE BREYERS COMMITTEE REPORT, 239 F.R.D. AT 214-15. COURT ORDER BEING A NULLITY
B- BECAUSE THE CHIEF JUDGE WAS NOT ABLE TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO THE MOTION INTELLIGENTLY, SHE DENIED IT IMMEDIATELY!
THE COURT OF APPEALS HAD JUDGES DIANE P. WOOD, AMY J. ST. EVE AND MICHAEL J. SCUDDER TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT SAYING THEY HAD NO JURISDICTION BECAUSE THE CASE WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS FILED 2 DAYS LATE
A- THAT WAS A BIG LIE, SO ON THE OTHER COURT ORDER A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE WAS ENTERED TO EXPLAIN WHAT THE CHIEF JUDGE COULD NOT EXPLAIN IS WHY THE CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED IN 14 DAYS.
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Monzella
Y. Johnson } Appeal from the United
Plaintiffs
–Appellant
}
States District Court for
} the Northern District of
}
Illinois, Eastern Division
V
}
No. 21-2905
}
} No. 1:21-cv-02707
U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION }
As TRUSTEE
for securitized Trust
}
2006-NC3,
et
al. }
Defendant-Appellees } Judge Gary Feinerman
RESPONSE TO RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR APPELLANT #2
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________
Monzella
Y. Johnson, Pro Se
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
“No one
is above the Law”, citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis
Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that
we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it
fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the
government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every
man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the
administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that
the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private
criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine
this court should resolutely set its face."
NOW COMES the Appellant, Monzella Y.
Johnson (Plaintiff), hereby respectfully Moves this court with corroboration,
affidavits, unimpeached Summary Judgments from all law firms associated in this
matter where court transcripts have been provided with prior Motion for
Reconsideration due to “Fraud” & Misrepresentations to the court with all
attachments {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedures} Demonstrating why said
Appeal should not be dismissed.:
1.) That the court order of
March 1st, 2022 where Judges Diane P. Wood, Michael Y. Scuddder, Amy
J. St. Eve egregiously erred, order states, “In this case judgment was
entered on September 2, 2021, and the notice of appeal was filed on October 6,
2021, two days late.”
A-
“IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction”.
That Petitioner prepared a
Jurisdictional
Statement (Oct 18, 2021)pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60 Relief from a
Judgment or Order:
(a) Corrections: Based on
Clerical Mistakes: Oversights and Omissions. The court may correct a clerical mistake
arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order,
or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with
or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court
and while it is pending, such a mistake maybe corrected only with the appellate
courts leave.
(b) Grounds for Relief from a
Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its
legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the
following reasons:
(1) Mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) Newly discovered evidence
that, with reasonable diligence, could have been discovered in time to move for
a new trial under Rule 59 (b);
(3) Fraud (whether previously
called intrinsic or extrinsic ), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an
opposing party;
(4) The judgment is void.
Order entered: June 30, 2021, September 2, 2021, September 20, 2021
Notice of Appeal filed: July 8, 2021, September 10, 2021, Oct 6, 2021,
Amended Notice of Appeal filed Oct 18, 2021, due to clerk not knowing of
September 20, Court Order was a FINAL ORDER
Statutes: Democratic Judges violating United States Supreme Court
Rulings, Judge Feinerman Ordered Clerks to return Notice of Appeal, Enforcing
“Jim Crow Laws” “Trespassing upon the Laws” “No Jurisdiction on case, Order
being Void a “Nullity” Obstruction of Justice ” Committing Fraud, Engaging in
Treason Like Offenses, Judges Committing Perjury, Judges aiding and abetting in
a Criminal Conspiracy, Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws
Violations, Judge acting outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, as
“Private Citizens” outlawed by the United States Supreme Court as they used their robes and jurisdiction to
aid and assist Terrorist Democratic Judges and Public Officials in covering-up
Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws,
Racial Hate Crimes, Slander and Defamation of Character, Civil Rights
Violations, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal
Corruption Conspiracies by Democrats, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless
Violations, Violation of Canon Ethics : A
judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. Canon
2: A judge shall
avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's
activities. Canon 3: A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office
impartially and diligently.
Plaintiff is appealing to the Court of Appeals, for
a Reversal Sanctions and Remand with instructions notifying Federal authorities
based on the foregoing stated above:
Plaintiff has Due-Diligently been fighting to keep their home from
unlawfully being stolen from them in the disguise as foreclosure before the
Supreme Court of Illinois, District Court and
Court of Appeals for over 13 years racist political judges appointed by
Alderman Edward Burke have systematically “Trespassed
upon the Laws” entering Orders that are “VOID” a “NULLITY” pursuant to the laws
of the United States Supreme Court as judges used their robes and unlawful
authority to maintain a Democratic “Lynching” of the laws on the Appellants as
senior citizens in that every Black and Brown person in the Democratic Party
kept their mouths shut because they are powerless over Anglo Saxon men in the
Democratic Party and they are only figureheads.
Plaintiff is appealing to the Court of Appeals,
because Anglo Saxon judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored that
they were the victims of an “Organized Conspiracy” perpetrated by Democratic
judges acting as “Private Citizens” controlling the Criminal Enterprise in all
of the courts controlled by Democrats, in that Judge Feinerman closed his eyes
to all Terrorist Treason offenses accompanied by an affidavit unimpeached by
every attorney.
“Grounds warranting a motion to
reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new
evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or
prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM
Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth
Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value,
unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3
Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).
A-
That
while case was on Appeal where Notice was filed September 10, 2021,
hereto attached, Document #34 validating the verity of proper fee being paid
with receipt number.
B-
That
Deputy Clerk Roberto Cornejo mailed to all parties that a Notice of Appeal had
been filed, hereto attached, September 14, 2021.
C-
That
Judge Feinerman allegedly received a HEFTY PAYMENT from U.S. Bank entered
an UNLAWFUL COURT ORDER and emailed the United States District Court
Financial Department, Fiscal Department (DAJ) hereto attached, ORDERING
THE CLERK TO VIOLATE PLAINTIFF’S CIVIL RIGHTS BY RETURN the Notice of Appeal
and Jurisdictional Statement.
D-
That
Judge Feinerman recruited other RACIST PERSONNEL (Manager of Docketing
Department Jim) to verbally dispatch him to provide false information to Court
of Appeals Clerks where a Clerk gave the name of Steve and file stamped Motions
Motion for Reimbursement of Unlawful Sanctions et al. and Motion for Extension
of Time to Submit Court Transcripts et al.
E-
That
certain RACIST CLERKS filled with HATE, DELETED THE ENTIRE record
from the DATABASE and returned the said motions by recording the false court
number 2264 on the document, but the clerk identified himself as a Steve
but initials GW is recorded on the documents, U.S. Marshalls and Court Security
would verify that on the day said document was filed video would show Joe Louis
had the documents filed and the clerk who received the documents was not a
Steve.
F-
That at
no time did any clerk on the 24th of September did anyone mention
any outstanding filing fees were in fact due.
G-
That said
HISTORY retrieved from the database on the 20th floor
indicates that said record was transmitted (Sept. 14, 2021) but was never
acknowledged because it was DELETED from the COURT OF APPEALS DATABASE, hereto
attached.
H-
To
further CORROBORATE and DEMONSTRATE the gravity of this TERRORIST
CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE Judge Feinerman ENGINEERED the MAIL FRAUD OF someone
mailing to the Plaintiff a CHECK FROM THE U.S. TREASURY “21 CV 2707 REFUND #35
FALSE STATEMENTS TO A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TO OBTAIN A LOAN”.
I-
That on Oct
4, 2021 Joe Louis accompanied retired sister Police Officer Ms. Johnson
seeking Greg and was met by Clerk S. said name will not be revealed because he
was never in any way racist or a part of
said Terrorist Conspiracy, stated no Greg works here, but was very helpful and
provided the documents, Jim was dispatching to him verbally on the phone,
hereto attached, case 18-1051 and 21-2264, but when Ms. Johnson requested the
name of the woman appeared as a Supervisor as she was making copies
demonstrating fees had been paid, her venomous reply was that, she don’t give
out her name, so it’s not difficult to ascertain or recognize the RACIST
HATEFUL PEOPLE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, they are all complicit in this
“TERRORIST CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY”
J-
That on Oct.
5, 2021 Sara the Supervisor who have demonstrated tremendous integrity in
this matter informed her that, they are
returning the Notice of Appeal and the check because the Court of Appeals is
not accepting the record.
K-
That
Judge Feinerman had knowledge affidavits of Defendant US Bank being served via
Registered Agent said Judge entered an ORDER, May 21, 2021, “Initial
Status Hearing” July 19,2021 at 9:15 am, “Initial Status Report” shall be
filed by July 12, 2021”.
L-
Plaintiff
filed a Motion to Disqualify Judge Gary Feinerman and all Northern District
Judges and Seventh Circuit Judges Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8
and 9(b); {28 USCA 144 (b) (1)} Filed Jun 7, 2021, Judge Feinerman became a
“Private Citizen” entered an order where Defendant never Denied or
Objected to any of the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
“Motion to disqualify judge is denied. “Plaintiff does not set forth
legitimate grounds for Disqualifying District Judge Feinerman”. (DENIED June 10, 2021).
M-
That
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of
Civil Procedures w/ Affidavit June 16, 2021. Judge Feinerman became a “Private
Citizen” (after Defendant admitted to all of the Pleadings of Judges colluding
with them in said “Criminal Organized Conspiracy”) DENIED June 22, 2021, “the
Summary Judgment, Motion for Summary Judgment is denied for failure to comply
with Local Rule 56.1. The Motion hearing set for 7/19/2021 is stricken.”
N-
That
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration due to Fraud &
Misrepresentations to the court Vacate all Judgments due to Democratic Judges
entering orders being “VOID” A “NULLITY” case being “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES
“TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TRESON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”,
June 28, 2021, Judge Feinerman demonstrated and corroborated his Racist Bias
animus hatred at the Plaintiffs, DENIED said Motion, “Motion for
reconsideration is denied. Plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought on
the motion”. (Denied June 30, 2021)
O- That on May 20, 2021, 14:06 hours US Bank was SERVED
CERTIFIED MAIL ON REGISTERED AGENT Pamela Ferguson signed for the
document tracking number 7019-1170-0001-0285-1637.
P- That PROOF OF SERVICE WAS FILED and DOCKETED
May 24, 2021 and a Copy was set aside for the judge via the Clerks
delivery.
Q-
That
said Judge Feinerman has demonstrated unequivocally using his robe and
jurisdiction to racially OPPRESS, LYNCH INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR, AS IF
THEY WERE ROPES, DOGS OR WATERHOSES BY APPLYING UNLAWFUL APPLICATIONS OF THE
LAWS IN AN TYRANNICAL TERRORIST MANNER, not fearing any retributions
because of his fraternal brethren in the Seventh Circuit, allegedly will DENY
ANY DOCUMENT Pro Se’s or individuals of color who presents valid legal claims
before that circuit they will be SYSTEMATICALLY DISMISSED.
R-
That Plaintiff and other innocent Litigants of color
cases seem to have appeared before JUDGES ALLEGEDLY DESCRIBED AS MEMBERS OF
THE KU KLUX KLAN, NAZI FRATERNAL ORDER OR WHITE NATIONALIST MEMBERS who are
systematically ORCHESTRATING THE VIOLENCE RACISM AND CORRUPTION IN THIS CITY
AND STATE as outlined in the aforementioned history of cases.
S-
“Any
judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United
States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the
Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken
at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the
United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has
acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason.
If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are
void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200
(1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an
act or acts of treason.”
T-
That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs
to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as
short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. Plaintiff complied with said
rule but the court was a law unto himself.
U- Posner:
ABA Journal (September 11, 2017) Most judges
regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire
because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se
litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about the
treatment of such litigants.
A-
“The basic thing
is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of
a federal judge,” Posner said.
In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro
se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges,
he noted.
Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake
by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of
judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program.
“But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to
give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.
Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming
book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the
court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he
said.
FROM PAGE 15 AND 16
1.) That Petitioner filed the
appropriate motion Dec. 2, 2021, before Chief Judge Diane S. Sykes, Motion
to Ascertain how Federal judge Diane S. Sykes have Jurisdiction or any judge in
the Seventh Circuit, when she has admitted being a DE FACTO ATTORNEY ET AL.
A- How can a Judge ignore the
law and rule in accordance to their personal HATRED OR BIASNESS
and at the same time create an error in their court order saying they don’t
have jurisdiction and DISMISS this case?
B-
Said judge received said motion Dec. 2, 2021, and DENIED the
motion Dec. 6, 2021 and stated, “but any further vexatious motions
will be returned unfiled”
C-
But Petitioner is under a COURT ORDER RESPONSE TO RULE TO
SHOW CAUSE, to ANSWER THE SAME QUESTION DIRECTED TO THE COURT, SHE COULD NOT ANSWER
SO SHE DENIED THE MOTION”.
D- Rather than transfer the
case out of the SEVENTH CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 26, Judges Diane
P. Wood, Amy St. Eve along with Scudder who was aware all along that Petitioner
was TRUTHFUL with her PLEADINGS, when he was with Judge Easterbrook and
Kanne, so he decided to violate Canon Ethics and RPC 3.3, by going along
with what can be described as a DELIBERATE ERROR or RACIST CONSPIRACY
to justify DISMISSING a VALID COMPLAINT by embracing RACISM and HATE
using his robe to LYNCH SAID PETITIONER WITH UNJUST LAWS BECAUSE OF HER SKIN COLOR..
Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the
depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law
by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573,
especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was
thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the
depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigan (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d
124, 55 Alr 2d 505
2.) Special Agent Emmerson
Buie, Jr. stated, "It demonstrates how far the reach
of corruption can go," FBI Chicago Special
Agent-in-Charge Emmerson Buie Jr. said. Madigan steered favorable legislation
for ComEd and also swayed lawmakers, prosecutors said”.
3.)
U.S. Attorney John Lausch announced
Wednesday that a federal grand jury returned the indictment on Wednesday.
Madigan is accused of using his official position to solicit personal financial
gains for himself and his associates. Madigan served as state representative
representing the 22nd state House District; committeeman for the 13th Ward in
Chicago – a position he still holds; chairman of the Illinois Democratic Party
and the 13th Ward Democratic Organization, and a partner at the Chicago law
firm Madigan & Getzendanner. The charges said Madigan and his “Madigan
Enterprise” abused these positions for personal gain. The indictment claims
that Madigan directed the activities of his longtime confidant Michael McClain,
who in turn carried out illegal activities at the behest of Madigan. McClain is
charged as a co-defendant in the indictment.
4.) That in spite of the
voices of the top legal entities FBI and United States Attorney, no case or any
judge has been presented to the GRAND JURY for the RETURN
OF INDICTMENTS for numerous judges and State Employees engaging in
various CRIMINAL ENTEPRISES conspiring with many Machine Operatives, due
to their Communist RussianTerrorist control of the legal democracy in Illinois.
A-
How do we not know said Political Machine is not affiliated with
Russians or their affiliates?
Tue, Mar 29 at 9:49 AMAttention Gov. Pritzker:I emailed you a Complaint
