He said this to CNN Chandelis Duster on Monday, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz called President Joe Biden's commitment to nominate the first Black woman to the Supreme Court "offensive" and said that by doing so the President is telling other Americans "you are ineligible."
"The fact that he's willing to make a promise at the outset, that it must be a Black woman, I gotta say that's offensive. You know, you know Black women are what, 6% of the US population? He's saying to 94% of Americans, 'I don't give a damn about you, you are ineligible'," Cruz said on an episode of his podcast "Verdict with Ted Cruz" that was released on Sunday. In 2019, Black women represented 7% of the US population, according to the US Census Bureau.
The Republican continued, "And he's also saying -- it's actually an insult to Black women. If he came and said, 'I'm gonna put the best jurist on the court and he looked at a number of people and he ended up nominating a Black woman, he could credibly say, 'OK I'm nominating the person who's most qualified.' He's not even pretending to say that he he's saying, 'If you're a White guy, tough luck. If you're a White woman, tough luck. You don't qualify.'"
Senator Ted Cruz can make an egregious statement calling President's Joe Biden's nomination of a woman of color (Black) to the Supreme Court of the United States offensive ok Senator if you believe that the best jurists are on the benches in the United States answer this:
Why are jurists in the Seventh Circuit who are supposed to represent "the most qualified" have admitted to and has corroborated in taken part in HATE CRIMES against women and men of color and they are on record not supporting or adhering to any laws of the United States Supreme Court or laws of the United States Constitution?
The Republicans are intertwined with Democrats enforcing JIM CROW LAWS in the FEDERAL COURT so perhaps a woman of color can help bring harmony and intellect with the others because the court lacks a female perspective coming from a Black woman, now let me ask you Senator Cruz is it offensive to have jurists in the Seventh Circuit to have engaged in crimes outdated by the United Supreme Court or are still going to try to justify nominating a Black woman to the United States Supreme Court Offensive?
ABC News suspended “The View” host Whoopi Goldberg for two weeks after she said the Holocaust was not about race, the network said Tuesday.
In a statement, Kim Godwin, president of ABC News, called Goldberg’s comments “wrong and hurtful.”
“While Whoopi has apologized, I’ve asked her to take time to reflect and learn about the impact of her comments,” Godwin said. “The entire ABC News organization stand in solidarity with our Jewish colleagues, friends, family and communities.”
My question here is to ABC News President Kim Godwin, I am very confused if Whoopi apologized for making any remarks offensive why was she suspended for 2 weeks?
We have racist Federal judges of the Jewish persuasion who act as if they are the prototypes of Hitler and is using his racist hateful disposition to oppress and violate the CIVIL RIGHTS of other women of color as others in the Jewish persuasion sit back and kept their mouths shut, nobody admonished this judge or any of his brethren in these diabolical hate crimes, so was Whoopi really suspended because of the color of her skin?
Take a real good look at this case in how racial hate plays out if a Black woman dare speak up or have an earnest disposition she is immediately invalidated or suppressed to oblivion as many are trying to cover-up the unlawful acts of Jewish and Ku Klux Klansman judges, but nobody is talking about this.
My 3rd and final question is to Sir Roland Martin can you explain to me how is it that Jason Van Dyke shot and killed Laquan McDonald 16 times but, Van Dyke is set to be released Feb. 3, having served three years, three months and nine days of the 81-month sentence handed down after his 2018 conviction for second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery — one for each bullet he fired at the 17-year-old.
My other question Roland is how is it a Nigerian immigrant who graduated from Depaul Law School, the same Law School Indicted Alderman Edward Burke graduated from who never killed anyone, never stole or carjacked anyone be treated as a FELON by having his law license permanently removed? Just recently he received a court order from the Illinois Supreme Court Jan 18, 2022 denying his Writ of Certiorari reinstating his law license because he as a man rightfully defended his clients reporting the corrupt judges in Cook County, how is it a white man can gun down a teenager spend basically 3 years in jail for murder but a man who committed no crime be denied practicing law where he honorably earned and paid for his education?
’Lanre O. Amu, B.C.E. (U of MN,’84, Graduated at the top of the Engineering Class with High Distinction); M.S.C.E (U of MN, ‘85); M.B.A. (UIC,’89), J.D. (1995). Beyond Qualifications, Integrity, Honesty, Transparency and Accountability must Reign Supreme in Our Courts. Those Are the Real Issues Here, Not Educational Qualifications Per Se.
Mr. ‘Lanre Amu is no Less Educated, No Less Ethical, No Less Honest, No Less Moral Than The 7 Justices Sitting in Judgment of Him:
Mr. Lanre Amu, Esq., had his license to practice law in Illinois suspended because he filed grievances against 4 judges over the course of 9-years. As is customary with “lawyer-whistleblowers” his license was suspended by the Illinois Supreme Court. There were no grievances filed against Mr. Amu by any person, lawyer, or even the judges subject of his grievances, there were no witnesses at the hearing. Mr. Amu was the ONLY witness at the Hearing. yet the Illinois Supreme Court suspended his law license — JUST BECAUSE!
.
This is the recent court order from the court racism and hate has become so vile in the United States and in the courts these individuals are blatant in their hostile racist acts against persons of color, and they don't fear any authority especially any person of color with any authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment