Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Thursday, October 7, 2021

 

US BANK PAID FEDERAL JUDGES AND OTHER RACIST PERSONNEL TO COVER UP THE FACT, THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR STEALING COLORED PEOPLE'S HOMES VIA ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES.

FEDERAL JUDGE GARY FEINERMAN WAS ALLEGEDLY UPSET BECAUSE HE COULDN'T RECRUIT CERTAIN CLERKS TO JOIN HIM IN HIS RACIST TIRADE IN MAKING CLERKS RETURN A SECOND APPEAL FILED SEPTEMBER 10, 2021.

HE ENGINEERED AN ILLEGAL COURT ORDER AND HAD IT EMAILED TO THE FISCAL DEPARTMENT TELLING THEM TO RETURN THEIR NOTICE OF APPEAL AND MONEY BY COMING UP WITH FEES ALLEGEDLY OWED NEVER BROUGHT TO THE JOHNSON SISTER, BY ANY CLERK OF THE DISTRICT OR COURT OF APPEALS.

WHAT FINERMAN DID NOT EXPECT WAS THAT THE CLERKS DOCKETED EVERYTHING HE SENT TO THEM TRYING TO BULLY AND INTIMIDATE THEM INTO VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF SAID WOMEN OF COLOR.

JUDGE FINERMAN WAS ALLEGEDLY PISSED A DEPUTY CLERK LAWFULLY MAILED TO US BANK INFORMATION THAT AN APPEAL HAD BEEN FILED AGAINST THEM, (SEPT. 14, 2021) WHATEVER US BANK PAID THIS JUDGE MADE HIM EXPOSE TO EVERYONE READING THIS BLOG THE NECESSARY TERRORIST CONNECTIONS, HE HAS "FIXING" ANY CASE INVOLVING HIM OR ANY RACIST DEFENDANT, THAT COMES BEFORE HIS COURT.

THE FOLLOWING COURT ORDER ISSUED BY RACIST REPUBLICANS WHICH STARTED THIS HATE CRIME BEGAN WITH SEVENTH CIRCUIT JUDGES FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, MICHAEL S. KANNE AND MICHAEL SCUDDER.

PAGE 1 OF THE COURT ORDER STATES FEE STATUS PAID.

PAGE 2 IS WHERE THE CRIMINAL ASPECT OF THE CASE JUMPS FROM CIVIL TO CRIMINAL, THE SECOND LINE 07/08/2021, "THIS IS NOTIFICATION THAT NO APPELLEE (S)  OR COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLEE (S) WERE SERVED IN THE DISTRICT COURT" THIS IS AN EGREGIOUS FUCKING LIE AND NOW PERJURY.

LINE 7/13/2021 AN ORDER WAS ENTERED, "APPELLANT SHALL FILE, ON OR BEFORE JULY 26, 2021, "A BRIEF MEMORANDUM STATING WHY THIS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION ET AL."   

THAT THE JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM WAS FILED 07/22/2021.

THAT THE JUDGES CLOSED THEIR EYES TO EVERY CRIMINAL RACIST DIABOLICAL HATEFUL TERRORIST ACTS PERPETRATED BY NOT JUST FEINERMAN BUT OTHER JUDGES AS WELL AS THEY SYSTEMATICALLY VIOLATED THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE PLAINTIFF AND OTHER PRO SE LITIGANTS AS WELL

 July 22, 2021 

                                        JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM

 

 

TO: Court of Appeals

 

FROM: Monzella Y. Johnson

 

CC:   All parties referenced in the Certificate of Service

 

SUBJECT:  Why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction:                                                                           

 Cook County Judges have been Indicted and Convicted for Corruption and “Fixing” cases in Greylord but Federal Democratic Judges are ignoring the crimes due to Defendant being female African Americans complaining not Anglo-Saxon person,  Jurisdictional Brief Memorandum (filed June 5, 2019, No. 19-2040 ) detailing how Democrats under Alderman Burke “Fixed” cases where Supreme court Judge Anne burke coercing a judge as an attorney, Anne Burke also requested that the judge withdraw from the case saying, “My husband was the one who put you on the bench.”                                    

          FACT: How the Political Machine of White Nationalists and Inferior Colored people within the party has circumvented the laws of the United States Constitution and United States Supreme Court laws circumvented the laws and still managed to ENFORCE JIM CROW LAWS by ignoring and DENYING every valid claim put before the DEMOCRATIC controlled LEGAL SYSTEM, said JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM articulates the BLUE PRINT, the hate the DEMOCRATIC PARTY STILL TO THIS DAY HAVE AGAINST PEOPLE OF COLOR or any ethnic group, that opposes them as the laws are used as a WEAPON, the new form of LYNCHING and TYRANNY.

           FACT:  Retired Judge Richard A. Posner on Record “The Basic Thing is that Most Judges Regard These People As Kind Of Trash Not Worth The Time”   In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.

Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.

Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.

Hon. Posner at least opened his mouth and became the “WHISTLEBOWER” admonishing his Republican colleague’s history already records the vicious hate Democrats had against people of color, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 speaks on this people need to see and understand RACISM, HATE, HOMOSEXUALITY, VIOLENCE is not in one party, it is in every party (Democratic, Republican) and every ethnic group.

 

1.)   A federal court always has the authority to determine its own jurisdiction. A federal court has the authority to determine whether it has jurisdiction to hear a particular case. United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 628 (2002) (citing United States v. Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258, 291 (1947)). • In re Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, Inc., 411 F.3d 367, 374 (2d Cir. 2005) (quoting United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258, 292 (1947) (“‘[A] court has jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction.’”).

       A- That Pursuant to the Jurisdictional Statement filed July 8, 2021, Page 4, Par A, Gr Ex A, (Summons et al.) Judge Feinerman had knowledge affidavits US Bank being served via Registered mail, 5/20,2021, Registered Agent Grace A. Gorka, signed for by Pamela Ferguson and Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549 Ex 25.1 acknowledging Grace A. Gorka as the Registered Agent for U.S. Bank National Association; He entered a court order May 21, 2021 “Initial Status Hearing” July 19, 2021 at 9:15 am.

                      Judge Sykes and Michael S. Kanne where former appointed Trump Amy Barrett authored the aforementioned ruling.

Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million Jury Verdict Against City in Shooting Incident

Wednesday, February 24, 2021    Julie Tappendorf

 The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer.

The Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's federal rights were violated, the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict against the City of Chicago, in that Ex’s A-D unequivocally demonstrate how Judge Feinerman and a plethora of other Judges in the Political Machine violated Section 1983 acting as “Private Citizens” using their robes and unlawful authority to LYNCH, DESTROY, and create GENOCIDAL EFFECT on the lives of Colored United States Citizens; whereby, said exhibits without a scintilla of falsity corroborates the DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE is the TALIBAN OF CORRUPTION and because of this Chicago, Illinois is so violent.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot blames the police superintendent; Superintendent David Brown blames the court system; Chief Judge Timothy Evens blames the Cook County State’s Attorney; States Attorney Kimberly Foxx blames the police department. 

Police Superintendent David Brown tried to blame the hot weekend’s convulsion of violence on the Cook County court systems bail reform, saying too many violent offenders are being released on electronic monitoring. “Chicago police officers are doing their job by arresting people and charging them with murder,” Brown said. 

CBS Chicago, Jermont Terry, July 6, 2021.

 

Those persons of color owned and controlled by the Political Machine do not have authority to admonish or criticize their members or Anglo- Saxons, or any Judge without the Machines authority, they are to blame or frame others who may share the same ethnicity which further corroborates why Chicago is not safe for all ethnic groups, due to the aforementioned and foregoing.

 

      B-  Proof of Service filed May 24, 2021;

 

      C- That Pursuant to Page 4, Par B Gr Ex B, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Disqualify Judge Gary Feinerman and all Northern District Judges and Seventh Circuit Judges Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and 9(b); {28 USCA 144 (b) (1)} filed June 7, 2021, he became a “Private Citizen” losing subject matter jurisdiction over the entire case, he stated, “Plaintiff does not set forth legitimate grounds for Disqualifying District Judge Feinerman” (Denied June 10, 2021), hereto attached, said motion of 22 pages and an unimpeached AFFIDAVIT, articulating how Democratic Judges using their robes as “Private Citizens” engaging in horrific “Treason” “Terrorist Offenses”.

THE JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM WAS 32 PAGES LONG WITH SUPPORTING EXHIBITS AND AFFIDAVITS.

THAT LINE 8/18/2021 15 COPIES OF THE PETITION FOR REHEARING BY APPELLANT MONZELLA Y. JOHNSON OBVIOUSLY TO ALL OF THE JUDGES NOT ONE JUDGE OPENED THEIR MOUTHS TO THE HATE CRIMES AND TERRORISTS ACTS OF JUDGES SHOWING THEIR TRUE COLORS OF JUDICIAL TERRORISTS ACTS BEING EXECUTED BY THEM AS "PRIVATE CITIZENS" NOT UNDER THE OATH OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. 

LINE 8/30/2021 ORDER. "APPELLANT MONZELLA Y. JOHNSON PETITION FOR REHEARING IS DENIED. THE APPELLANT IS SANCTIONED $1,000 FOR FILING A FRIVOLOUS PETITION FOR REHEARING. WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE APPELLANT MUST TENDER A CHECK PAYABLE TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT FOR THE FULL AMOUNT OF THIS SANCTION. THE CLERKS OF ALL FEDERAL COURTS IN THIS CIRCUIT SHALL RETURN UNFILED ANY PAPERS SUBMITTED EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY OR ON BEHALF OF JOHNSON UNLESS AND UNTIL HE PAYS IN FULL THE SANCTION THAT HAS BEEN IMPOSED AGAINST HIM AND ALL OUTSTANDING FILING FEES ET AL".

THAT ON 9/10/2021 MS. JOHNSON REPORTED TO THE 27TH FLOOR COURT OF APPEALS AND WAS MET BY A COURTEOUS CLERK, SHE EXPLAINED THAT SHE WAS THERE TO PAY THE $1,000 SANCTION, HE ASKED HER IS THAT PART OF IT ? HER REPLY WAS ALL OF IT, ALL OF A SUDDEN 7-8 CAUCASIANS CAME OUT OF THEIR OFFICES FROM BOTH SIDES WITNESSING HER FILE OUT THE CHECK.

THE SANCTION WAS A RACIST HATEFUL WAY TO OBSTRUCT APPELLANT'S CIVIL RIGHTS BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY PROVING THAT DOMESTIC TERRORISTS ARE NOT ONLY REPUBLICANS BUT DEMOCRATS AS WELL AND FURTHER DEMONSTRATED THAT APPELLANT WAS A FEMALE AND NOT A MAN.

THAT BECAUSE APPELLANT PAID THE UNLAWFUL SANCTION OF $1,000 ALLOWED HER THE OPPORTUNITY TO FILE HER SECOND APPEAL WHERE FEINERMAN ENTERED AN ORDER AUGUST 27, 2021, FOR THE APPELLANT TO APPEAR IN COURT ORIGINALLY 9/10/2021 BUT STRUCK THAT DATE AND RESET THE STATUS CALL FOR 9/8/2021 AT 9:00 AM, BUT ON SEPTEMBER 2, 2021 HE DISMISSED THE CASE, HE NEVER SAW THE PLAINTIFF IN COURT OR HAD A CONVERSATION WITH HER.

A- THAT ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2021 AFTER PAYING THE $1,000 UNLAWFUL SANCTION PLAINTIFF WAS ALLOWED TO FILE HER SECOND NOTICE OF APPEAL AND PAID THE $500 AS WELL.    

B- THAT ON SEPTEMBER 14, DEPUTY CLERK SENT A NOTICE OUT TO U.S. BANK LETTING THEM KNOW, THAT A NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS FILED AGAINST THEM.

C- THAT ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2021, THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT TRANSMITTED THE SHORT RECORD TO THE COURT OF APPEALS  .

D- THAT ON SEPTEMBER 20, PLAINTIFF HAD TO FILE STAMP THE COURT TRANSCRIPT REQUEST AND DEPOSITED IT IN HIS MAIL SLOT BECAUSE HE NEVER RESPONDED TO ANY EMAILS NOR DID ANY CLERK IN THE FEDERAL BUILDING 


Marcia Johnson frogishtwo65@gmail.com

Sat, Sep 18, 8:01 AM
to Charles_Zandi
Good Morning Sir: 

Monzella Y. Johnson v US Bank et al., 21 cv 02707, 

I am requesting the transcripts for September 2, 2021, May 21, 2021, June 10, 2021, June 22, 2021, June 30, 2021, July 13, 2021, August 25, 2021.

Thank you,
 
ORDERING ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Name of Ordering Attorney: Ms. Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se
Firm Name: Monzella Y Johnson
Firm Address: 5217 S Ingleside, Chicago Il 60615
Name of Contact Person: Ms. Monzella Y. Johnson
 

Marcia Johnson frogishtwo65@gmail.com

Sep 18, 2021, 8:09 AM
to ilnd_courtservices

THAT ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2021 PLAINTIFF FILED 2 MOTIONS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS:

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

 

Monzella Y. Johnson                                                 } Appeal from the United

Plaintiffs –Appellant                                                  } States District Court for

                                                                                  } the Northern District of

                                                                                  } Illinois, Eastern Division

V                                                                                }

No. 21-                                                                      }

                                                                                  }    No. 1:21-cv-02707                                                  

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                    }

As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust                           }

2006-NC3, et al.                                                       }

Defendant-Appellees                                                }  Judge Gary Feinerman

                                                                                

 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF UNLAWFUL SANCTIONS DUE TO JUDICIAL “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” JUDGES NOT HAVING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS  DUE TO JUDGES ENGAGING IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES ENTERING ORDERS BEING “VOID” A “NULLITY” CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”   ALTERNATIVELY DISQUALIFY JUDGES DUE TO BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} Canon 3E (1990) TRANSFER CASE PURSUANT TO RULE 26 BREYERS COMMITTEE REPORT239 F.R.D. at 214-15  TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT OUTSIDE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                                           

RETIRED 7TH CIRCUIT JUDGE RICHARD A POSNER STATED “MOST JUDGES REGARD PRO SE LITIGANTS AS KIND OF TRASH NOT WORTH THE TIME”


                                             MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

                                                SUBMIT COURT TRANSCRIPTS  

                                                                   

    Now comes Defendant Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se hereby respectfully Moves this court with corroboration and affidavit the noted reasons herewith her Affidavit in support of Motion for Extension of Time et al;

 

                                                                                     Respectfully submitted,

 

 

                                                                                  Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se

                                                                                         5217 S. Ingleside Ave

                                                                                        Chicago, Il 60615


BECAUSE SAID WOMEN ARE SENIORS JOE LOUIS DELIVERED THE MOTIONS TO THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT AND ASKED THE CLERK HIS NAME WHO HANDED HIM ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS FILE STAMPED, THE CLERK ASKED HIM FOR THE CASE NUMBER, JOE EXPLAINED TO HIM, THAT THIS IS A SECOND APPEAL AND THE CASE NUMBER FOR THIS CASE HAS NOT BEEN MAILED OUT, THE CLERK SAID THEIR IS NO OTHER CASE IN THE SYSTEM ONLY CASE 2264, IT WAS EXPLAINED TO HIM THAT CASE IS NOT IT BECAUSE IT IS OVER AND ASKED THE CLERK HIS NAME, HIS HESITANT REPLY WAS STEVE.


NEVER AT ANY TIME DID STEVE MENTION THAT FEES WERE DUE OR THEIR WERE ANY OUTSTANDING DEBTS THAT HAD TO BE RESOLVED.


THE ABOVE MOTIONS WERE RETURNED WITH SOMEONE FALSELY RECORDING 21-2264 ON THE DOCUMENTS SAYING THE PLAINTIFF OWED FEES.


I RETURNED TO THE COURT OF APPELS WITH MS. JOHNSON TO ASCERTAIN WHAT FEES WERE THEY REFERENCING AND ASKED FOR STEVE, A CLERK RESPONDED EMPHATICALLY WHERE A FEMALE WAS PRESENT (WHO HANDLES THE FINANCES AND RECONCILES), HE SAID NO STEVE WORKS HERE, I KNEW THEN THEIR WAS SOME BULLSHIT GOING ON.


THE CLERK MADE IT CLEAR IN HIS PROFESSIONAL DEMEANOR, HE WAS NOT A PART OF THIS RACIST DEBACLE, HE PROVIDED PRINTOUTS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS DATABASE SHOWING ALLEGED FEES APPELLANT SUPPOSEDLY OWED FROM VERBAL DIRECTIVES FROM JIM (ALLEGED MANAGER IN THE DOCKETING DEPARTMENT) WHO WAS WORKING INTIMATELY WITH FEINERMAN.


JIM WAS AWARE OF THE CLERK WHO DELETED THE SECOND APPEAL FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT DATABASE, THAT IS WHY AFTER FILING THE MOTIONS ON FRIDAY SEPT. 24, 2021, THE RACIST CLERKS AFFILIATED IN THIS CRIMINAL ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY, WAS TRYING TO PROTECT THE CLERK, BY RETURNING THE CHECK AND ALL DOCUMENTS ALL ON SEPT. 27, 2021.


JUDGE FEINERMAN THOUGHT, HE COULD BULLY OR INTIMIDATE CERTAIN CLERKS REALIZED, THEY DID NOT GIVE A SHIT HE WAS A JUDGE DID NOT FALSIFY OR DO ANYTHING ILLEGAL AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, SO HE ENGINEERED AND SIGNED AN UNLAWFUL COURT ORDER AND EMAILED IT TO THE FISCAL DEPARTMENT, SEPT.  20, 2021, DIECTING THE CLERKS TO RETURN THEIR MONEY AND NOTICE OF APPEAL BACK TO THEM BECAUSE SHE OWED FEES ON CASES NO CLERK EVER INFORMED HER ON.


FEINERMAN NEVER HAD JURISDICTION OR ANY AUTHORITY TO SIGN ANY ORDERS OF ANY SORT BECAUSE THE CASE WAS LEGALLY BEFORE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.  


NOW MS JOHNSON IS HOLDING THE BOGUS CHECK UNTIL WE MEET WITH THE FBI OR US ATTORNEY TO DETERMINE WHO WILL INVOKE JURISDICTION BECAUSE IT CORROBORATES, THE JUDGE IS COMPLICIT IN MAIL FRAUD BY AUTHORIZING A FEDERAL CLERK TO VIOLATE A CHECK BY RECORDING ON THE CHECK, "21 CV 2707, REFUND #35

FALSE STATEMENTS TO A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TO OBTAIN A LOAN"


THIS IS SOME CRAZY SHIT THE JUDGE CONCOTED, TRYING TO ENTRAP HER IN HIS MESS ALONG WITH A POSSE OF OTHER INSURRECTIONISTS INDUCING RELIANCE ON SO MANY OTHERS TO VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF SAID SENIORS BECAUSE OF DELUDED IMPRESSION OF BEING A GOD OR DIETY UNTOUCHABLE, DUE TO HIS FRATERNAL BRETHERN OF THE SAME CLOTH IN THE COURT OF APPEALS.   

  

Please see  the attached email requesting court transcripts to court reporter Charles Zandi
(_Open link in New tab_ for better resolution image to read.)








  


To:Kenneth Ditkowsky
Cc:kate.milani@wsj.com,aclu@aclu.org,executive-editor@nytimes.com,wsj.lts@wsj.com,member@email.aarp.org
Wed, Oct 6 at 11:42 PM
Professor Ken:

It appears that we are in the midst of a Racial War and nobody wants to be the elephant in the room bringing attention to it RACISM JUDGES AND CERTAIN FEDERAL PERSONNEL acting as they are members of the KU KLUX KLAN or NAZI FRATERNAL ORDER, it is clear they are INSURRECTIONIST, NOT EVEN MAYOR LIGHTFOOT IS OPENING HER MOUTH TO DENOUNCE THESE DIABOLICAL CIVIL RIGHTS TERRORIST ACTS.

IT'S AMAZING SHE WANTS FELONY CHARGES AGAINST VIOLENT OFFENDERS KILLING OTHER ALLEGED GANG MEMBERS BUT NEVER OPENED HER MOUTH TO ANY OF THESE EGREGIOUS ACTS OF TERRORISM against women of color as Senior Citizens, I wonder why not?

Talking about corrupt Cook County judges is a waste of time when you have Federal Judges engaging in RACIAL WARS against people of color emailing Court Orders while cases are on Appeal telling Clerks to violate the law and return the Appeal and the money; moreover, what is worse, this judge was able to recruit other like minded racist to assist him in these diabolical terrorist acts.

IN THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

           

   MONZELLA JOHNSON

         

             

                                     

                                      Plaintiffs,

 

 

 U.S. BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3; UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, AKA “MERS”

                                        

                   


                                        Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

  ______________________

Hon. Gary Feinerman

 Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings

 

 

Civil Action No.

21-cv- 02707

 

 

 

 

 

                                NOTICE OF APPEAL

 

 To:  Registered Agent:

         Grace A. Gorka

         US Bank Natl. Assoc.

         190 S. LaSalle,

         Chg. IL 60603

 

                                                                     

COURTESY COPIES TO THE FOLLOWING:

 

      Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot  Special Agent in Charge (FBI)

        City Hall 7th floor                     Emmerson Buie, Jr.

       Chicago, IL. 60601                  2111 West Roosevelt Road

                                                          Chicago, Il 60608

U.S. Attorney John R. Lausch, Jr.

219 S. Dearborn

Chicago, Il 60604

 

Said case demonstrates within the parameter of the laws how the Illinois legal system is under siege, as stated in earlier affidavits, the Ku Klux Klan, pursuant to the act of 1871 Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) Remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”)

 

This case demonstrates HATE has crossed all party lines and is a threat to National Security and no one is safe because they can bypass the normal protocols of passing through metal detectors and shoot up personnel in the federal building because nobody is reading anything.  

 

Judge Feinerman and all racists personnel associated in this criminal conspiracy are demonstrating the necessary terrorist tactics, they are willing to exhaust on persons of color, who challenges their authority or attempts to report any of their actions to the proper authorities, not fearing any Federal officials as everyone can see in this case.

 

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on October 6 , 2021, A Notice of  Appeal and Jurisdictional Statement has been filed before the Northern District of Illinois .  

 

                                                                            Respectfully Submitted

 

                                                                             ______________________                                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                  Monzella Y. Johnson

                                                                                 5217 S. Ingleside Ave.

                                                                                   Chicago, IL. 60615

                                                                                                                   

                                                                          

Dated October 6, 2021

                                                       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                           

 

           

             

   MONZELLA  Y. JOHNSON


                                     Plaintiff

 

 U.S. BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3; UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, AKA “MERS”

                                        

                   

                                        Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

  ______________________

H. Gary Feinerman

 Magistrate Judge Jeffrey  Cummings

 

 

Civil Action No.

21cv- 02707

 

 

 

 

                                                  Jurisdictional Statement

 

Order entered: June 30, 2021, September 2, 2021, September 20, 2021

Notice of Appeal filed: July 8, 2021, September 10, 2021, Oct 6, 2021.

 

Statutes: Democratic Judges violating United States Supreme Court Rulings, Judge Feinerman Ordered Clerks to return Notice of Appeal, Enforcing “Jim Crow Laws” “Trespassing upon the Laws” “No Jurisdiction on case, Order being Void a “Nullity” Obstruction of Justice ” Committing Fraud, Engaging in Treason Like Offenses, Judges Committing Perjury, Judges aiding and abetting in a Criminal Conspiracy, Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Judge acting outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, as “Private Citizens” outlawed by the United States Supreme Court  as they used their robes and jurisdiction to aid and assist Terrorist Democratic Judges and Public Officials in covering-up Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Racial Hate Crimes, Slander and Defamation of Character, Civil Rights Violations, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies by Democrats, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations, Violation of Canon Ethics : A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. Canon 2: A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities. Canon 3: A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

 

   Plaintiff is appealing to the  Court of Appeals, for a Reversal Sanctions and Remand with instructions notifying Federal authorities based on the foregoing stated above:

 

   Plaintiff has Due-Diligently been fighting to keep their home from unlawfully being stolen from them in the disguise as foreclosure before the Supreme Court of Illinois, District Court and  Court of Appeals for over 13 years racist political judges appointed by Alderman Edward Burke have systematically “Trespassed upon the Laws” entering Orders that are “VOID” a “NULLITY” pursuant to the laws of the United States Supreme Court as judges used their robes and unlawful authority to maintain a Democratic “Lynching” of the laws on the Appellants as senior citizens in that every Black and Brown person in the Democratic Party kept their mouths shut because they are powerless over Anglo Saxon men in the Democratic Party and they are only figureheads.

 

   Plaintiff is appealing to the  Court of Appeals, because Anglo Saxon judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored that they were the victims of an “Organized Conspiracy” perpetrated by Democratic judges acting as “Private Citizens” controlling the Criminal Enterprise in all of the courts controlled by Democrats, in that Judge Feinerman closed his eyes to all Terrorist Treason offenses accompanied by an affidavit unimpeached by every attorney.

 

“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value, unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3 Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).

 

A-     That while case was on Appeal where Notice was filed September 10, 2021, hereto attached, Document #34 validating the verity of proper fee being paid with receipt number.

 

B-     That Deputy Clerk Roberto Cornejo mailed to all parties that a Notice of Appeal had been filed, hereto attached, September 14, 2021.

 

C-    That Judge Feinerman allegedly received a HEFTY PAYMENT from U.S. Bank entered an UNLAWFUL COURT ORDER and emailed the United States District Court Financial Department, Fiscal Department (DAJ) hereto attached, ORDERING THE CLERK TO VIOLATE PLAINTIFF’S CIVIL RIGHTS BY RETURN the Notice of Appeal and Jurisdictional Statement.

 

D-    That Judge Feinerman recruited other RACIST PERSONNEL (Manager of Docketing Department Jim) to verbally dispatch him to provide false information to Court of Appeals Clerks where a Clerk gave the name of Steve and file stamped Motions Motion for Reimbursement of Unlawful Sanctions et al. and Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Court Transcripts et al.

 

E-     That certain RACIST CLERKS filled with HATE, DELETED THE ENTIRE record from the DATABASE and returned the said motions by recording the false court number 2264 on the document, but the clerk identified himself as a Steve but initials GW is recorded on the documents, U.S. Marshalls and Court Security would verify that on the day said document was filed video would show Joe Louis had the documents filed and the clerk who received the documents was not a Steve.

 

F-     That at no time did any clerk on the 24th of September did anyone mention any outstanding filing fees were in fact due.

 

G-    That said HISTORY retrieved from the database on the 20th floor indicates that said record was transmitted (Sept. 14, 2021) but was never acknowledged because it was DELETED from the COURT OF APPEALS DATABASE, hereto attached.

 

H-    To further CORROBORATE and DEMONSTRATE the gravity of this TERRORIST CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE Judge Feinerman ENGINEERED the MAIL FRAUD OF someone mailing to the Plaintiff a CHECK FROM THE U.S. TREASURY “21 CV 2707 REFUND #35 FALSE STATEMENTS TO A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TO OBTAIN A LOAN”.

 

I-       That on Oct 4, 2021 Joe Louis accompanied retired sister Police Officer Ms. Johnson seeking Greg and was met by Clerk S. said name will not be revealed because he was never in any way racist  or a part of said Terrorist Conspiracy, stated no Greg works here, but was very helpful and provided the documents, Jim was dispatching to him verbally on the phone, hereto attached, case 18-1051 and 21-2264, but when Ms. Johnson requested the name of the woman appeared as a Supervisor as she was making copies demonstrating fees had been paid, her venomous reply was that, she don’t give out her name, so it’s not difficult to ascertain or recognize the RACIST HATEFUL PEOPLE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, they are all complicit in this “TERRORIST CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY”

 

J-      That on Oct. 5, 2021 Sara the Supervisor who have demonstrated tremendous integrity in this matter informed her that,  they are returning the Notice of Appeal and the check because the Court of Appeals is not accepting the record.   

K-    That Judge Feinerman had knowledge affidavits of Defendant US Bank being served via Registered Agent said Judge entered an ORDER, May 21, 2021, “Initial Status Hearing” July 19,2021 at 9:15 am, “Initial Status Report” shall be filed by July 12, 2021”.

 

L-     Plaintiff filed a Motion to Disqualify Judge Gary Feinerman and all Northern District Judges and Seventh Circuit Judges Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and 9(b); {28 USCA 144 (b) (1)} Filed Jun 7, 2021, Judge Feinerman became a “Private Citizen” entered an order where Defendant never Denied or Objected to any of the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “Motion to disqualify judge is denied. “Plaintiff does not set forth legitimate grounds for Disqualifying District Judge Feinerman”.  (DENIED June 10, 2021).

 

M-   That Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures w/ Affidavit June 16, 2021. Judge Feinerman became a “Private Citizen” (after Defendant admitted to all of the Pleadings of Judges colluding with them in said “Criminal Organized Conspiracy”) DENIED June 22, 2021, “the Summary Judgment, Motion for Summary Judgment is denied for failure to comply with Local Rule 56.1. The Motion hearing set for 7/19/2021 is stricken.”

 

N-    That Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration due to Fraud & Misrepresentations to the court Vacate all Judgments due to Democratic Judges entering orders being “VOID” A “NULLITY” case being “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TRESON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”, June 28, 2021, Judge Feinerman demonstrated and corroborated his Racist Bias animus hatred at the Plaintiffs, DENIED said Motion, “Motion for reconsideration is denied. Plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought on the motion”. (Denied June 30, 2021)

 

O-    That on May 20, 2021, 14:06 hours US Bank was SERVED CERTIFIED MAIL ON REGISTERED AGENT Pamela Ferguson signed for the document  tracking number 7019-1170-0001-0285-1637.

 

P-     That PROOF OF SERVICE WAS FILED and DOCKETED May 24, 2021 and a Copy was set aside for the judge via the Clerks delivery.

 

That said Judge Feinerman has demonstrated unequivocally using his robe and jurisdiction to racially OPPRESS, LYNCH INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR, AS IF THEY WERE ROPES, DOGS OR WATERHOSES BY APPLYING 






No comments:

Post a Comment