ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES IN ILLINOIS IS LIKENED TO HOUSE JACKING WITH THE SURGE OF CAR JACKINGS IN ILLINOIS
1.) SEE HOW CORRUPT JUDGES GO ALONG WITH ANGLO SAXON ATTORNEYS STEAL BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLES HOMES CREATING JOBS FOR CORRUPT ATTORNEYS AS THEY, ARE ABLE TO COME TO COURT ILLEGALLY WITH THE BANK PAYING THEM TO STEAL PEOPLES HOMES, BUT FOR THE PERSONS WHO HAVE WORKED HARD FOR THEIR HOMES HAVE TO SPEND ALL OF THE MONEY IN EARNED PENSIONS OR SAVINGS TO KEEP WHAT ALREADY BELONGS TO THEM.
2.) AMERICA WATCHED ON JAN 6, 2021 HOW SO MANY REPUBLICANS SEIZED THE WHITE HOUSE AND MANY FELT JUSTIFIED IN COMMITTING THOSE CRIMES AND BRAGGED ON SOCIAL MEDIA MANY OF THEIR PARTICIPATION IN THE INSURRECTION.
3.) HERE IN ILLINOIS WE HAVE DEMOCRATS OF ALL ETHNICITIES COMMITTING THE SAME INSURRECTION ACTS AND THEY TOO FEEL JUSTIFIED AND GRANDIOSE IN THEIR TERRORIST ACTS AS THEY HAVE SEIZED THE ILLINOIS COURTS, STATE AGENCIES.
4.) BECAUSE THIS IS SO SAD TO SAY BUT SEEMINGLY TRUE, MANY BLACKS ARE IN LEADERSHIP POSITIONS AND HAVING BEEN SPONSORED, ENDORSED OR APPOINTED TO THEIR POSITIONS, THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PROSECUTE, CRITICIZE, OR OPEN THEIR MOUTHS TO THE INJUSTICES PERPETRATED ON PEOPLE OF COLOR OR THE ELDERLY, DUE TO THEIR INFERIOR NATURE.
5.) CHICAGO IS LIKE A PLANTATION OR NAZI WAR CAMP FILLED WITH DUPLICITIES, DISPARATE LIVING CONDITIONS AND WELL SEGRAGATED WITH DOWNTOWN AND NORTH SIDE RECEIVING PRIORITY PREFERENTIAL SERVICES OVER SOUTH OR WEST SIDES.
6.) THIS IS WHY CHICAGO IS NAMED THE MOST CORRUPT CITY IN AMERICA, WE NEED BETTER DIVERSITY AND QUALIFIED PERSONNEL IN POSITIONS WAY TO MANY UNQUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS HAVE BEEN EITHER ELECTED OR APPOINTED TO POWERFUL POSITIONS AND ARE ONLY IN THE POSITIONS TO PROTECT AND UPHOLD RACISM, CRONYISM, OR INJUSTICE.
A- FOR EXAMPLE NET FLIX IS REMOVING THE JAMIE FOXX MOVIE DJANGO FROM THE STATION, I HAVE NO IDEA WHY SOMEONE NEEDS TO UPDATE A NEW MOVIE FEATURING CHICAGO TREATING THEIR UNITED STATES CITIZENS AS MODERN DAY SLAVES STILL ENFORCING "JIM CROW" LAWS OUTLAWED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
B- AN IMMIGRANT OF NIGERIAN/AMERICAN DECENT FINISHED LAW SCHOOL AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY WITH A ENGINEERING DEGREE, THE MAN WAS SO SMART, SMARTER THAN EVERY CAUCASIAN ATTORNEY COMING OUT OF DEPAUL LAW SCHOOL, WHEN HE WAS PRATICING LAW, HE COMPLAINED THAT ANGLO SAXON JUDGES WERE ENGAGING IN CORRUPT PRACTICES AGAINST HIS BLACK CLIENTS, FALSE CHARGES WERE LEVIED AGAINST HIM WHERE HIS LAW LICENSE WAS SUSPENDED.
C- I TOO NOT BEING A MEMBER OF THE ILLINOIS BAR GOT ACCEPTED INTO NORTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL IN 1990 OR 1991, THEY SAID, I SCORED VERY HIGH ON THE LAST EXAM MY RESPONSIBLITY WAS THAT, I HAD TO SECURE A WAY TO GET FINANCIAL AID, BUT A CORRUPT PATERNITY CASE NAMING OVER 50 JUDGES WERE INVOLVED "FIXING" THE CASE PREVENTING ME WWORKING, A REDNECK JUDGE RONALD BARTKOWICZ ISSUED A BOGUS WARRANT AGAINST ME, AGAINST A POLICE OFFICER AT THE TIME (FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER AKA FRANKIE) HAD ME HANDCUFFED IN THE COURT ROOM SAYING THE CTA SAID, THAT I, WAS NOT A CTA EMPLOYEE, KEEP IN MIND THIS JUDGE WAS A ATTORNEY IN THE WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT WHERE CTA HAD STOLEN MY WAGES, THEY NEEDED THE JUDGE TO HELP THEM BY KEEPING AWAY FROM THE JOB BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY TO PROTECT EVERY PERSON INVOLVED STEALING BLACK AND BROWN OPERATORS MONEY WHO WAS OFF WORK WITH WORK-RELATED INJURIES.
D- I WAS FORCED ON PUBLIC AID AND THE JUDGE TOLD ME TO GO AND DRIVE A FUCKING SCHOOL BUS AND IF, I EVER TRIED TO GO BACK AND GET REINSTATED BACK TO THE CTA, HE WAS GONG TO LOCK ME UP!!!!
E- MY LANDLORD WAS A RETIRED COOK COUNTY SHERIFF AND LOVED ME AND MY CHILDREN AS HER OWN FAMILY, HAD A FRIEND JAMES MONTGOMERY, SHE SENT ME TO HIM, I MET HIM A GENUINE BEAUTIFUL MAN REFERRED ME TO WILLIAM STEWART BOYD, A MASON FROM SOUTH SIDE LODGE BEING PRINCE HALL, HE TOLD ME NOT TO DO ANYTHING ELSE ON MY CASE, WHEN A JUDGE THREATENS YOU IN ANY CAPACITY, YOU HAVE TO BACK UP AND FIND SOME HELP, BOYD FOUND OUT, I WAS NOT THE FATHER AND NEGOTIATED A JUDGES POSITION OUT OF THE DEAL HE NEVER WITHDREW FROM MY CASE AND NEVER TOLD ME HE WAS GETTING OFF MY CASE, MY MOM WAS ON HER COMPUTER AND ASKED ME FOR HIS NAME, SHE FOUND THIS INFORMATION OUT.
7.) APRIL 1ST MY BIRTHDAY, I CALLED SPRINGFIELD TO ASCERTAIN THE FOLLOW-UP OF MY COMPLAINT AGAINST ILLINOIS CHILD SUPPORT, THEY FINALLY GAVE ME A NAME AND FAX NUMBER FOR ME TO FAX EVERY DOCUMENT SHOWING, THAT THE EMANCIPATED CHILD (TYCEE HIGHTOWER) IS NOT MY CHILD, AND COURT DOCUMENTS SHOWING, I WAS NEVER ORDERED TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT.
A- FIRST SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 IS WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AGAINST ME WITH AN ATTORNEY WHERE, I REQUESTED A JURY CHILD, MAYOR DALEY WAS THE STATES ATTORNEY.
B- SPRINGFIELD DON'T HAVE ME IN THEIR COMPUTER DATABASE OF ANY CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS OF ME OWING ANY CHILD SUPPORT, SO THEY HAVE REQUESTED CHICAGO SEND IT TO THEM VIA ESCALATION, NOBODY HAS COMPLIED IN CHICAGO, SO THEY ARE ASKING ME TO SEND INFORMATION.
C- THERE IS A MAY 18TH COURT ORDER WITH NO JUDGES NAME OR ATTORNEY INFORMATION ON IT FINDING ME IN DEFAULT AND NOT ORDERING TO PAY ANY CHILD SUPPORT, KEEP IN MIND BECAUSE OF THE TIME ALL OF THIS OCCURED IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO HAVE DOCUMENTS BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE INVOLVED THOUGHT ALL OF THE INFORMATION WAS IN FACT DESTROYED.
8.) I HAVE A JUDGMENT COURT ORDER NEVER OWING CHILD SUPPORT BUT JUDGES, HAVE LOCKED ME UP 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT, WHAT IS EVEN FUCKED UP IN 2003 OR 2004 JUDGE DAVID E. HARACZ SAID TO ME AS, I STOOD BEFORE HIM, "YOU REALLY ARE A CTA EMPLOYEE, YOU ARE REALLY SMART" BUT HIS NEXT STATEMENT WAS CRAZY, HE SAID BIOLOGICALLY, THE CHILD MAY NOT BE YOURS, I AM JUST THE BILL COLLECTOR, I HAVE TO GET MONEY FROM YOU SOME KIND OF WAY, KEEP IN MIND, I WAS ON WELFARE AND TOLD HIM ALL, I HAD WAS WELFARE, HE ASKED ME IF ANYBODY ELSE IN MY FAMILY MY MOM OR GRANDMOTHER, I TOLD HIM WE ARE POOR AND NOBODY HAS MONEY, SO HE AGREED TO LET ME MAKE $30 AND $40 PAYMENTS, A HISPANIC SISTER LOOKED AT MY CASE TOLD ME THIS WAS SOME SHIT, I WAS GOING THROUGH, SHE APOLOGIZED TOLD ME YOU DON'T OWE ANY MONEY.
9.) BEING INNOCENT, BLACK OR BROWN MEANS NOTHING IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS BECAUSE #BLACKLIVES DON'T MATTER.
THESE SISTERS CASE IS SCHEDULED FOR ZOOM HEARING TUESDAY APRIL 6,AT 1:00 PM
 | Filing AcceptedEnvelope Number: 12713681 |
The filing below was reviewed and has been accepted by the clerk's office. You may access the file stamped copy of the document filed by clicking on the below link.
| Filing Details | |
|---|---|
| Court | Cook County - Chancery |
| Case Number | 2008CH33616 |
| Case Style | MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGIS Vs. JOHNSON MONZELLA |
| Date/Time Submitted | 3/25/2021 12:52 PM CST |
| Date/Time Accepted | 3/25/2021 12:58 PM CST |
| Accepted Comments | |
| Filing Type | EFile |
| Filing Description | |
| Activity Requested | Exhibits Filed |
| Filed By | Marcia Johnson |
| Filing Attorney | |
| Hearing Date | No hearing scheduled |
| Court Room Number | No hearing scheduled |
| Court Address | No hearing scheduled |
| Document Details | |
|---|---|
| Lead Document | Black and White0008.pdf |
| Lead Document Page Count | 17 |
| File Stamped Copy | Download Document |
| This link is active for 660 days. | |
If the link above is not accessible, copy this URL into your browser's address bar to view the document:
https://illinois.tylerhost.
Please Note: If you have not already done so, be sure to add yourself as a service contact on this case in order to receive eService.
| Wed, Mar 31, 12:29 PM (2 days ago) |  | ||
| ||||
Please Find Courtesy Copies for April 6, 2021 Hearing
RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE “PRIVATE CITIZEN” FOR “CAUSE” USING HER ROBE ENGAGING IN A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY & VACATE (February 9th 2021) ORDER DUE TO 14th AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS MAKING THE ORDER A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT.
5. The above documents are filed in numerical sequential order #01000223, #01000224, #01000225, #01000226, #01000227 in the event the computer crashes and this information is not available.
6.) The Feb, 3, 2021 Re Notice was in fact properly filed OF MOTION TO REINSTATE SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION STRIKING & OBJECTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND ET AL. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALEXANDER B. POSTESTIVO ET AL., MOTION STRIKING AND OBJECTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS FRIVOLOUS ET AL. REPLY MOTION TO ANYTHING PLAINTIFF FILES ET AL. DUE TO JUDGE LYLE NOT HAVING JURISDICTION TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE ORDER “VOID” A “NULLITY” w/AFFIDAVIT
A- Plaintiff's exhausted a lot of labor perusing this case only to learn that, other judges committed the same criminal acts and is a norm on persons of color, THERE WAS NEVER A CHILD SUPPORT ORDER ON THE DEFENDANT, even though there was a JUDGMENT establishing he never owed CHILD SUPPORT, judges violated his CIVIL RIGHTS and still had his wages EXTORTED FROM HIM, AND HAD HIM REMANDED INTO CUSTODY 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT.
8.) Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. Plaintiff is demonstrating in said Exhibits a plethora of other judges engaging in crimes as insurrectionist and obviously is not going to be the only law firm taking SANCTIONS OR REMANDS IF JUDGE LYLE IS REMOVED SO THEY HAVE STRATEGICALLY INTRODUCED FRAUDULENT INFORMATION IN THEIR RESPONSES OF THE NORMAL PRACTICES OF WHAT OTHER
JUDGES DO "FIXING CASES"Part 2 of 2
| Wed, Mar 31, 12:42 PM (2 days ago) | | ||
| ||||
Respectfully submitted,
No comments:
Post a Comment