CHICAGO DEMOCRATS ESPOUSES TERRORISTS HATE AT PERSONS OF COLOR SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION NO REPUBLICANS EVER ATTEMPTED:
THIS CASE DEMONSTRATES WHAT COLORED PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO DO TO BE ACCEPTED BY MEMBERS OF THE TERRORIST POLITICAL DEMOCRATIC MACHINE.
FOR STARTERS IN MANY INSTANCES THE BLACK MAN IS THE NEW BLACK WOMAN THAT ARE INTERTWINED IN THESE DIABOLICAL ACTS; MOREOVER, IT IS UNFATHOMABLE AS TO WHY IS IT WHEN BLACK MEN ARE GAY AND IS SLEEPING WITH WHITE MEN THEY VERY VERY RUDE AND NASTY?
IN THIS CASE THEIR ARE SO MANY MEN AS JUDGES AND CITY OFFICIALS WHO HAPPENS TO HAVE WIVES AND CHILDREN ARE LIVING IN THE CLOSET ENGAGING IN SOME OF THE PSYCHOTIC ACTS EVER RECORDED.
NOT ONE MAN INVOLVED IN THESE ACTS TOOK A STAND AND ADMONISHED ANYONE FOR THE FOREGOING, IN THAT THEY HAVE ADMITTED EVERYTHING PROPERLY ASSERTED IN THE POST DATED DECEMBER 12, 2017.
CHICAGO DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT ANY MEN OF COLOR TO WORK PROVIDE FOR THEIR FAMILIES IN ANY CAPACITY IN THAT MANY OF THE MALES IN POWER WHO HAPPENS TO BE BLACK, NEGROID, AFRICAN AMERICAN ARE SADLY SOME OF THE WORSE JUDGES ANYBODY OF COLOR WOULD EVER WANT TO GO BEFORE AND THE BLACK WOMAN IS NEXT.
WHEN ANY ETHNIC GROUP READ THIS THEY CAN NOW UNDERSTAND WHY CHICAGO IS A CITY FILLED WITH HATE AND DESPAIR AND NOT A PLACE TO REAR ANY FAMILY OF COLOR LET THIS CASE SERVE AS AN EXAMPLE AND LESSON ON INNOCENT MEN OF COLOR ARE CRIMINALIZED OR WORSE CASE SCENARIOS HOW THEY LANGUISH IN PRISONS FOR A MULTIPLE NUMBER OF YEARS BEFORE DNA FINALLY EXCLUDE THEM OF ANY CRIMES ACCUSED OF.
THIS CASE IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT @Redbilla Lee Oties Love, Jr. EXPERIENCED WITH JUDGE LOZA IN THAT, SHE ACTED LIKE A MALE OPPRESSOR REALIZING NOBODY HAD ENOUGH INTEGRITY OR TESTICLES TO ADMONISH HER FOR HER RACIST TRESPASSING ACTS UPON HIM.
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE HERE IS THAT EVERY JUDGE WHO HAVE TRESPASSED UPON THE LAWS AND HAS RECEIVED THEIR APPOINTMENTS ALLEGEDLY SLEPT WITH THE RIGHT PRESIDING JUDGE OR POLITICIAN, ALLEGEDLY PAID$20,000.00 + TO ED BURKES CAMPAIGN OR OTHER DESIGNATED POLITICAL CAMPAIGN.
JUDGES LIKE VALDERRAMA HAPPENS TO BE TOTALLY IGNORANT NOT WORTHY OF WEARING A BLACK ROBE IN ANY CAPACITY UNLESS IT IS A BATHROBE
ALLEGEDLY, VALDERRAMA WAS INFORMED ON HOW TO HANDLE MY CASE, HE ASSURED THEM HE COULD TAKE CAR OF ME .
THE LAST TIME A BLACK JUDGE SAID THEY COULD HANDLE ME WAS ASSOCIATE JUDGE MORGAN HAMILTON WHO WAS PERMANENTLY ASSIGNED AS AN ASSOCIATE BY BURKE.
THE CHOICE WAS BETWEEN JEANNE BERNSTEIN WHO DID'NT REALLY CARE FOR HISPANICS AT AL AND MORGAN HAMILTON STATED LOUDLY IN FRONT OF DEPUTIES AND OTHER JUDGES "YALL STILL HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THAT NIGGER? GIVE HIM TO ME"
KEEP IN MIND A MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE BOYD WAS ON THE TABLE (WHO CAME WELL RECOMMENDED BY ONE OF THE MOST INTELLECTUAL MEN IN LAW WITH IMPECCABLE INTEGRITY JAMES MONTGOMERY) BOYD WAS MY ATTORNEY WHEN ALL OF THE CROOKED SHIT WAS GOING ON DEFENDED ME WELL BUT ALL OF SUDDEN STOPPED AND WAS APPOINTED JUDGE ACTED LIKE HE DID NOT KNOW ME TRIED TO KEEP ME FROM HAVING CUSTODY OF MY CHILDREN WHERE MY EX WIFE HAD A HISTORY OF MENTAL DEPRESSION AFFECTING THE CHILDREN.
MY CAUCASIAN COLLEAGUES TOLD ME THEIR IS NOT ONE BLACK JUDGE YOU MAY THINK IS A BROTHER OR ANY IRISH JUDGE WILL EVER RULE IN YOUR FAVOR, THEY WERE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, I HAVE NEVER HAD ANY SUCCESS FROM ANY BLACK DEMOCRATIC JUDGE MALE OR FEMALE NOT EVEN DOROTHY BROWN AS THE CLERK WHO KNEW THE PATERNITY CASE WAS BOGUS.
IF A DIVIDED HOUSE CAN NOT STAND, HOW CAN A DOUBLE MINDED MAN MARRIED TO A WOMAN WITH A FAMILY HAVE A MAN ON THE SIDE AND SLEEP WITH HIM AS LONG AS HE IS IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS WIFE?
HOW CAN THESE TYPE OF MEN BE IN POWER ADMONISH ANYONE ENGAGED IN TRESPASSING ACTS OF TREASON WHEN THEY ARE LIVING A LIE?
BECAUSE CROOK COUNTY IS GOVERNED BY A MILITIA LIVING IN THE CLOSET AS THE LAWS STATE WHEN A JUDGE VIOLATES HIS OATH HE BECOMES AND IS ACTING AS A "PRIVATE CITIZEN" A THUG, A HOODLUM IN A ROBE, TERRORIST--BECAUSE NOBODY OBJECTED OR DENIED ANYTHING THAT WAS PROPERLY RECORDED, THEY HAVE ADMITTED ALL PLEADINGS AS BEING TRUE AND IS HOPING THAT THIS CASE NOT LAND IN THE HANDS OF A QUALIFIED HETEROSEXUAL WITH IMPECCABLE INTEGRITY TO RECOGNIZE THE TYPE OF FRATERNAL INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE INVOLVED.
MANY THANKS TO EVERYONE ON TWITTER FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND RETWEETS, MANY THANKS TO ALL OF THE MEMBERS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS AND CLERKS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF DOROTHY BROWN LAST BUT DEFINITELY NOT LEAST THOSE JUDGES WHO SURPRISINGLY BELIEVED IN ME AND APPLIED THE LAWS IN MY FAVOR NOT JUDGING MY SKIN COLOR.
I WANT TO PERSONALLY THANK THE STATES ATTORNEYS AND DETECTIVES ON AN ADMIRABLE JOB BRINGING THE CASE TOGETHER ON THE BROTHERS RESPONSIBLE FOR KILLING MY BROTHER TIMOTHY DAVID LAWRENCE (CITY EMPLOYEE).
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16 CV 7434
Hon: Robert
M. Dow, Jr.
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT
Now
comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully
represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in
support of Motion for Summary Judgment et al;
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
_________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312 965-6455
Joelouis565@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT
1.
I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Petitioner in this cause,
being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;
2.
That on December 18, 2017 Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.
entered a “Minute Order” hereto attached, “Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate the case is taken under advisement.
The court will issue a ruling by mail after it has taken an opportunity to
review the motion and the prior history of the case, …..et al. Notice of motion
date of 12/21/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.”
3.
That pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure RULE 8 (1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:
(A) State in short
and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and
(B) Admit or
Deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.
(2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond
to the substance of the allegation.
(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to
deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may
do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations
must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all
except those specifically admitted.
(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith
to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny
the rest.
(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must
so state, and the statement, has the effect of a denial.
(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation –other than one relating
to the amount of damages –is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and
the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required an
allegation is considered denied or avoided.
4.
That said Defendants Defaulted in the same like manner
in the Cook County Court and relied on a Negroe judge inferior in nature to “Trespass
upon the Laws” and commit all sorts of infamous crimes, trying to save the
perpetrators guilty of Housing Discrimination and Voucher Discrimination along
with various acts of Civil Rights violations hereto attached, Brief before
the Seventh Circuit filed March 14, 2018; (Lee Oties Love, Jr. v Supreme Court of IL. Et
al.)
A- Said
Brief unequivocally demonstrate the magnitude African American Democrats are
willing to do to destroy their own ethnic group so as to be accepted by “White
Nationalist” controlling the Democratic party “Political Machine” by
embracing “Jim Crow Laws” by denying
any and all claims put before the courts by persons of color against Caucasian
racist Irish and other Democrats.
B- That
no Defendant denied or responded to the merits of the Brief at the time of this
Motion being filed validating the verity of all acts by members of the
Democratic Political Machine in it’s entirety.
5. That
under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke he has recruited Ronald Bartkowicz
former CTA workman’s compensation attorney to “Trespass upon the Laws”
in that said judge issued a Bogus warrant against the Petitioner on a Bogus
paternity case where he was unlawfully arrested his CTA Badge was removed from
his body so as to protect the racist individuals responsible for stealing his
wages while off work injured on duty where a drunk police officer totaled his
van on Petitioners bus while he was standing still;
A-
Hereto attached, per subpoena Cook County judge not
connected to the Democratic Machine of Racist and inferior Terrorists ordered
the production of said CTA records, demonstrating Petitioner still being a CTA
employee;
B-
That because ATU 241 Secretary Michael Simmons was
having and alleged intimate relationship with former Chief attorney Kent
Stephan Ray and other men in the closet of the union obstructed his
reinstatement, in that no heterosexual man of any competent or erect authority demonstrated
any integrity only total impotency at the Petitioner for taking a stand at so
many of them in their cowardly fraternal order;
6.
That under the authority of Alderman Edward Burke
he recruited the other aforementioned judges David Haracz, Timothy P.
Murphy, see unlawful1.blogspot.com Chronology of Unlawful Contempt Charges
by the Democratic Political Machine, August 30, 2012, demonstrating how racist
Democrats “Trespass upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason.”
7. That
because so many black men Negroe or African American are the new black women
for these Cacausion men with wives and children none of them opened their
mouths; moreover, there is a person in prominent authority been married to his
wife for 10, 20 or 30 years had a man in his life almost the same time of his
marriage so it is these type of individuals who are not at all what they appear
to be but is using their political, racist and sexual cowardice at the
Petitioner for being what he was born to be a man, a man’s man.
8.
Allegedly, Edward Burke had Judge John T. Carr to aid and assist his ex-wife by having the
court reporter to allegedly leave the court as he aided her by allowing her to
manufacture allegations of domestic abuse on his children DCFS got involved
asserting he was a black belt in martial arts using it to discipline his
children, by her going along with these sick acts she was promised welfare in
her name. (none of it was true) they tried getting the Police involved “Desk Sargent told DCFS not to bring that shit back up in
here!”
A- To
further amplify the horrors of hate Edward Burke and his regime of judges using
their robes to “Trespass upon the Laws” Petitioner was taking his family
to family psychiatrist at least 2 and 3 times a week behind the episodes of
what he was going through in the courts.
9. Allegedly,
Edward Burke and other Democrats incur profits off of judges “Trespassing
upon the laws” where injustice is present, in that, hereto attached,
Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account, manufactured by the Illinois
Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services asserting Petitioner owes $228.00 on a
case Democratic Judges have used their robes as “Private Citizens”
aiding and abetting in “Treason” and a plethora of diabolical criminal
conspiracies seeking money in an unlawful manner.
A-
“Private Citizen” Valderrama having cognizance
of the plethora of criminal acts of what other judges engaged in against the
Petitioner demonstrated untouchable arrogance because nothing happened to the other
judges, thought he could profit off the Petitioner but what he was too ignorant
to realize none of the judges signed any court orders on the 88 D 079012 case,
he has signed every court order and has agreed to everything by not denying
anything.
Defendants have not raised any
affirmative defenses.
Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions,
admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the movant or non-movant
fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby
1.
Entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of
law.
The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of
fact, but simply to
Determine whether one exists.
When the party moving for summary judgment supplies
evidentiary facts which,
If not contradicted,
would entitle him to judgment, the opposing party cannot
Rely upon his
complaint or answer alone to raise issues of material fact. A counter
Affidavit is
necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit
Supporting the motion
or else the facts are deemed admitted.
Here, Plaintiff has supplied
affidavits, Certified Court transcripts and other evidentiary material that
establishes all of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery under the
parties’ agreements, including the amount of damages. Defendants have failed to
submit any evidence in opposition to the Motion or Order to raise any genuine
issues of material fact. Thus summary judgment is proper.
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification;
and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are
considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol,
1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not
have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a
judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are
engaged in treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him
any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state
officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
Joe
Louis Lawrence
__________________
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312
965-6455
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
WHEREFORE the aforementioned
reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Granting
Summary Judgment Instanter.
2.
For an Order issuing a Rule
to Show Cause Remanding Franklin U. Valderrama into Custody Instanter.
3.
For an Order appointing a
Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to
investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist
Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;
4.
For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties
noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens”
perpetrating roles as judges Trespassing upon the Laws”
5.
For an Order on bond be
not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these
crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.
6.
For an Order removing the
Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all Circuits who as Public
Servants failed to investigate remove or report any judge in accordance to
their oath and Public Duty.
7.
For an Order setting a
Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not
exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or
report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their
oaths as judges.
8.
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16 CV 7434
Hon: Robert
M. Dow, Jr.
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
NOTICE
OF
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE w/AFFIDAVIT
Please be
advised that on, April 24, 2018
Plaintiff has filed before this District Court, Motion for Summary Judgment et
al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before any Judge in judge Robert M. Dow’s stead May 2 , 2018, at 9:15am in room 1919.
Chicago
Housing Authority
Wilson
Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of
the General Counsel Christian
T. Novay
Asst
Gen Counsels
55
West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Maria
Sewell Joseph T.B. King
Chicago,
Il 60603
60 East
Van Buren
Chicago,
Ill 60605
Seyfarth & Shaw
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris
Willis/Sears
Tower
Chicago,
Ill. 60603
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602
Cary
G. Schiff & Associates Gordon
& Rees LLP
Christopher
R. Johnson
Goli
Rahimi
Yuleida
Joy
1
North Franklin, Suite 800
134 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1720
Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Lewis
Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
Christian
Novay
550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago, IL. 60661
Chief Judge
Timothy C. Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
Presiding
Judge Moche Jacobius, Room 2403, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Assc.
Judge Franklin U. Valderrama, Room 2402, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Clerk
of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg Ill. 60601
States
Attorney, Kim Foxx, Room 500 Daley Center,
Chg. Ill. 60601
Atty
Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
CHA
Mobility
CHA
Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris
Klepper, Executive Dir
Tracey
Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East
Jackson Blvd. 4859
S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago,
Ill 60604
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
CHA
Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Jessie
McDaniel
4859 S.
Wabash
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
Courtesy
Copies:
US
Attorney FBI Dir. Chris Wray
John
R. Lausch, Jr. 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon
Mark Kirk
Bruce
Rauner
607 East Adams, Suite 1520
100 West
Randolph, Suite
Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Mayor
Deputy
Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm
Emanuel
Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77
West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Hon
Dick Durbin
Judge
525 South
8th St.
Frederick
Bates
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
50 West Washington Room
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Celia C. Gamrath Judge
50 West
Washington Room 2508 Neil Cohen
50 West Washington Room 2308
Alderman
David Moore
Alderman Ed Burke
Alderwoman
Carrie Austin
Alderwoman Emma Mitts
Cook
County President
Cook
County Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle
Thomas
J. Dart
118 N.
Clark, Room 517
Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on April 24, 2018, A Motion for Summary Judgment et
al. has been filed with the Northern District of Illinois and said copies being
served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago,
Ill 60649
312 965-6455
@joelouis
