DEMOCRATS HAVE PROVEN WITHIN THE PREPONDERANCE OF THE LAWS THEIR RACIAL HATRED TOWARDS ANY WOMAN OR MAN OF COLOR AND THAT INDEPENDENT WHITES OR ANY REPUBLICANS SUFFER THE SAME FATE THAT OPPOSES THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE IN POWER:
DEMOCRATS HAVE OVERTURNED THE LEGAL SYSTEM HERE IN ILLINOIS ALL COURTS AND ARE NOW DEEMED AS DOMESTIC TERRORISTS:
HERE IS AN INNOCENT MOTHER MARRIED WITH BABIES JUDGE LOZA TOOK PART IN AN ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY ABDUCTING THIS WOMAN'S SON FROM HIM GIVING HIM TO HER BROTHER WHO'S WIFE IS UNABLE TO CONCEIVE ANY CHILDREN.
A COWARD AND BULLY FORMER JUDGE MICHAEL I. BENDER MANUFACTURED THE DOCUMENTS ABDUCTING HER CHILD FROM HER AND HE HAD THE AUDACITY TO AUTHOR THE RULE TO SHOW CAUSE DOCUMENTS THAT LOZA SIGNED OFF ON ILLEGALLY TO REMAND THIS INNOCENT WOMAN TO JAIL BECAUSE SHE WON'T PAY THIS CORRUPT WHITE MAN ANY MONEY!
AN EMERGENCY MOTION WAS FILED FEB. 22, 2018 TO APPEAR BEFORE JUDGE NORGLE BUT JUDGE NORGLE INFORMED HIS CLERK ON FEB 22, 2018 THAT HE WILL HEAR THE CASE FRIDAY AND COPIES WERE LEFT WITH THE CLERK ERIC FULBRIGHT AND FILED DOWNSTAIRS ON THE 20TH FLOOR.
ON FRIDAY FEB. 23RD JUDGE NORGLE ISSUED A DIRECTIVE STATED, NONE OF THE PARTIES ARE HERE AND THAT HE NEEDED PROOF ALL PARTIES HAD BEEN SERVED.
ON FRIDAY FEB. 26 MONDAY, A RE NOTICE OF THE MOTION WITH AFFIDAVITS SHOWING ALL PARTIES WERE IN FACT PROPERLY SERVED COURT DATE WAS SET FOR WEDNESDAY AT 9:30AM FOLLOWING THE DIRECTIVE OF JUDGE NORGLE.
ON WEDNESDAY FEB 28, 2018 AT 9:30 AM THE CASE WAS NOT ON THE CALL BUT WAS ON THE CALL LAST FRIDAY, JUDGE NORGLE REFUSED TO HEAR THE MATTER CITING HE HAD NOT RULED ON HER INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION AND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY HE HAD SINCE DEC. 11, 2017:
I AM LIKE WTF IS GOING ON????? WE CAN NOT GET JUSTICE IN THIS CITY CONTROLLED BY DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.
CARLEN COLBERT FILED CHARGES WITH THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE AND FBI.
LEE OTIES LOVE, JR. HAVE SUFFERED UNDER THIS SAME RACIST EVIL JUDGE FULL OF DEMONIC HATE COOK COUNTY DEPUTIES TALK ABOUT HER IN HOW SHE IS UNTOUCHABLE SHE MUST HAVE A LITTLE BLACK BOOK ON ALL OF THE MALE JUDGES SLEEPING WITH EACH OTHER WHO HAS PAID HOW MUCH TO GET THEIR POSITION OF JUDGE.
JUDGE LOZA HAS ISSUED BOGUS WARRANTS AGAINST LEE BUT A FEDERAL JUDGE SHARON JOHNSON COLEMAN SAID ON THE RECORD SHE HAS NO JURISDICTION ON WHAT LOZA DID TO HIM, SHE NEEDED PERMISSION ON WHAT THE JUDGES UPSTAIRS TELL HER WHAT TO DO.
SEEING THAT DEMOCRATS ARE CONTROLLING THE MAYHEM AND CHAOS OF INJUSTICES IN ILLINOIS COURTS WHAT IF EVERY BLACK AND BROWN PERSON VICTIMIZED BY UNEQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS IN THE COURTS DECIDED TO BOYCOTT THE GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION AND EVERY OTHER ELECTION THE RACIST DEMOCRATS WERE IN CONTROL OF?
FIRST A PERSON HAVE TO GET TIRED OF BEING TIRED BEFORE THEY MAKE ANY CHANGES!
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
)
In Re: The
Parentage of )
2008
D 80400
)
Robert
Stafford )
Hon.
Pamela E. Loza
Plaintiff ) Room 3009
)
)
V
)
Carlen
Colbert )
Defendant )
)
)
________________________________________________________________________
Motion to
Quash Warrant of Defendant Instanter Due to “Fraud” (Civil Rights Violations) due to “Trespassing
upon the Laws” Court never had Jurisdiction Orders are “Void” a “Nullity”
Now comes Defendant, Carlen
Colbert Pro Se in this cause, files herewith her affidavit, factually
establishing the Motion to Quash Warrant Instanter Due to “Fraud” (Civil Rights Violations) due to “Trespassing
upon the Laws” Court never had Jurisdiction Orders are “Void” a “Nullity”, in
accordance to the Supreme Court of Illinois and Canon rules in accordance to
the American Jurisprudence and pleadings (rev.) to show that the Honorable Pamela
Loza has with vexatious “Contempt for the laws” has “Trespassed” upon the
Laws and has engaged in “Treason” against the Defendant and has satisfied the
preponderance of the evidence standards by engaging in a criminal conspiracy
assisting a non custodial person allowing him to kidnap said minor and colluded
with former judge in an elaborate extortion scheme;
Based thereon Defendant
respectfully moves that the Honorable Pamela E. Loza proceed no further herein,
and that the Honorable Timothy C. Evans Chief Judge or Presiding Judge of Domestic
Relations of the Circuit Court of Cook County assign this matter accordingly to
a competent judge who is capable of abiding by the Illinois Supreme Court rules
and laws of the United States Constitution.
A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates
disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court
rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to
accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s
indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with
our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its
citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
A-
Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v.
United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v.
C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question
that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the
procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328
U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth
such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.
v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v.
Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto)
61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
B-
“A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A
judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and
lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a
nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no
judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at
any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44,
45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d
227-232
C-
“A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal
efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and
effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in
any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked
at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v.
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st
Dist. 1964)
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42
U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not
to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d
384 (1990).
1.
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish
that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process,
either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
a.
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
2.
That said judge acted as a “Private
Citizen” using her robe and authority to bully and incite Terrorist Acts
upon the Defendant for challenging her authority by seeking jurisdiction of the
Federal court;
- That “Private Citizen” Loza was
cognizant Defendant never owed any money to “Private Citizen” Bender,
hereto attached, Sept. 3, 2015 Defendant and minor child’s father signed
said motion in unison 298 is stamped clearly communicating to any clerk or
judge that said fees had been waived and authorized by a Cook County judge
(David Delgado);
- To further amplify and corroborate “Private Citizen” Loza engaging in
an “Organized Conspiracy” against the Defendant, hereto attached, court
order Loza signed, states “The
September 3, 2015 court date is stricken” and it is back dated Sept.
1, 2015;
B. That due to the judges Bias and or Prejudice
conduct pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for
Removal, conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be
sufficiently violative of the Judicial Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano
v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied,
409 U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
C.
Said Judge violated all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of
Judicial Conduct Rule Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386
N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo.
May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of
the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver
County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could
not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct
constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the
administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute).
Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant
discipline.
- Based on the veracity of the
aforementioned pleadings outlined
within corroborates the fact, the warrant levied at the Defendant was entered against her unlawfully and with vexatious
contempt for the laws, moreover, further demonstrates the judge and other parties to
the judge complicit in acts of “Trespassing upon the Laws”
WHEREFORE. Defendant respectfully prays that this Court
- Order that Warrant against the
Defendant be Vacated Instanter;
- Order that all parties be
investigated Instanter for the enforcement of all laws violated in this
manner;
- Invoke any and all remedies this
court deems overwhelmingly just for the enforcement of this matter;
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
_________________
Carlen Colbert
Pro Se
1805 Jamestown Cir.
Hoffman Estates, Il 60169
(708)
200-9437
a.
Respectfully
Submitted
________________________
Carlen Colbert
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLNOIS
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
)
In Re:
The Parentage of
)
2008
D 80400
)
Robert
Stafford
)
Hon. Pamela E. Loza
Petitioner )
Room 3009
)
)
V
)
Carlen
Colbert
)
Respondent )
)
)
________________________________________________________________________
Notice of
Motion to
Quash Warrant of Defendant Instanter Due to “Fraud” (Civil Rights Violations) due to “Trespassing
upon the Laws” Court never had Jurisdiction Orders are “Void” a “Nullity”
Courtesy Copy Hon Charles
R. Norgle, Sr.
TO: U.S. Attorney,
John R. Lausch 219
South Dearborn Suite 500, Chg 60605
Chief Judge Timothy
Evans, Room 2600 Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
Presiding
Judge Grace Dickler, Room 1905 Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Judge Debra B. Walker, Room
2108, Daley Center, Chg. IL 60601
States Attorney, Kim Foxx, Suite 500 Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Anton Colbert, 140 Percy Julian
Sq, Oak Park, Ill. 60302-2619
Michael I. Bender 70 West Madison,
Suite 2222, Chg. Ill. 60602
Robert Stafford c/o CTA Kedzie
Garage 358 S Kedzie Chg IL 60612
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on March 2nd, 2017 A Motion to Quash Warrant et al. has been filed in the Circuit Court
of Cook County; and will present said legally
sufficient instrument before Judge Loza or any Judge in her stead March 8,
at 9:30 am in room 3009.
Respectfully, Submitted,
________________________
Carlen Colbert
1805 Jamestown Cir.
Hoffman Estates, Il 60169
(708) 200-9437
CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE
The
undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were
caused to be personally delivered, or mailed to the above parties at the
addresses provided before 5:00 pm March
1st, 2018.
________________________
Carlen
Colbert
Respectfully Submitted,
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLNOIS
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
)
In Re:
The Parentage of
)
2008 D 80400
)
Robert
Stafford
) Hon.
Pamela E. Loza
Petitioner ) Room
)
)
V
)
Carlen
Colbert
)
Respondent )
)
)
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
)
COUNTY OF COOK )
I Carlen Colbert being duly sworn on oath
states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to
735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
____________________
Carlen Colbert
1805 Jamestown Cir.
Hoffman Estates, Il 60169
No comments:
Post a Comment