#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases: February 2018

Monday, February 26, 2018

COOK COUNTY JUDGES HAVE A DAY IN FEDERAL COURT "TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS" AS JUDGES ACT AS "PRIVATE CITIZENS" ENFORCING "VOID" ORDERS UPON INNOCENT CITIZENS OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AS THE THE NEW DOMESTIC TERRORIST.

PER JUDGE NORGLES' DIRECTIVE FRIDAY AFFIDAVITS ARE ATTACHED SIGNED AND NOTARIZED VALIDATING THE VERITY THE PARTIES HAD BEEN SERVED.

LOZA HAS NO RESPECT FOR THE LAWS PEOPLE OF COLOR AND HAS DEMONSTRATED A HATE FOR MEN AS SHE LODGED UNWARRANTED ATTACKS AT OTIES LEE LOVE, JR. @redbilla PLACING HIM IN CONTEMPT OF COURT UNLAWFULLY BECAUSE HE WAS A MAN WHO TOOK A STAND RESPECTFULLY AND LEGALLY WITHIN THE LAWS TRYING TO SEE HIS SEED BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER.

EVERY BLACK DEMOCRAT READING HIS PLIGHT DID NOTHING!

LOZA CAN VENT HER HATRED AT FEDERAL JUDGE NORGLE WEDNESDAY NOBODY CAN SAVE HER OR ANY JUDGE CAUGHT TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS.

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Carlen Colbert Civil Action #17-cv-08467

Hon: Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

Plaintiff

Magistrate: Judge Susan E. Cox

Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy

C. Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker

Defendants

RE NOTICE OF EMERGENCY MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT

PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING PAMELA E. LOZA et. al. & ATTORNEYS “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” CORROBORATION IN AN ORGANIZED CHAIN CONSPIRACY “TREASON” “FRAUD OF ALL SORTS” /CONTEMPT OF COURT OTHER IRREGULARITIES

REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER

MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING STATE AND COUNTY COURTS FROM ENTERING ANY JUDGMENTS INSTANTER AND VACATE ALL ORDERS VOID IN NATURE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF

To the most Honorable Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District:

Moving Party, Carlen Colbert, hereby respectfully represents as Pro Se shows this court with an affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be entertained within this courts Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to the provisions of the United States Constitution}

Per Judge Norgle’s instructions regarding proof all parties were served Feb 23, 2018; whereby Plaintiff shall comply with said directive.

That on Feb. 28th, 2018, Plaintiff shall present this Motion at 9:30 am before Honorable Emergency Judge, Sr. in room 2338A, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL. 60604;

To: Dir. Chris Wray FBI 601 4^th Street Washington D.C. 20535

US Attorney, John R. Lausch, Jr. 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

To: Pamela E. Loza 50 West Washington, Chicago, IL 60601 Room 3009;

Michael I. Bender, 70 West Madison, Suite 2222 Chg. IL 60602,

Timothy C. Evans 50 West Washington, Chg. IL. 60601 Room 2600;

Anton Colbert, 140 Percy Julian Sq., Oak Park, IL. 60302-2619

Grace Dickler 50 West Washington, Chg, IL 60601 Room 1905;

Debra B. Walker, 50 West Washington, Chg. Il 60601 Room 2108

PLEASE BE ADVISED that on February 28, 2018 A Re Notice Emergency Motion to Supplement Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al have been filed with all attachments before the United States District Courts.

Respectfully Submitted

_______________________

Carlen Colbert

1805 Jamestown Cir.

Hoffman Estates, IL. 60169

Certificate of Service

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above Petition with attachments was caused to be delivered by regular mail to the above named parties.

______________________

Carlen Colbert

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Carlen Colbert Civil Action #17-cv-08467

Hon: Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

Plaintiff

Magistrate: Judge Susan E. Cox

Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy

C. Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker

Defendants

EMERGENCY MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT

REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER

MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING STATE AND COUNTY COURTS FROM ENTERING ANY JUDGMENTS INSTANTER AND VACATE ALL ORDERS VOID IN NATURE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF

Now comes Carlen Colbert., Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court her Emergency Motion to Supplement Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Pamela E. Loza et al. & Attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws” Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Treason” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Mandatory Injunction prohibiting State County courts from entering any judgments Instanter and Vacate all orders Void in nature against the Plaintiff.

Said reasons are recorded in the attached affidavit;

Respectfully Submitted

_______________________

Carlen Colbert

1805 Jamestown Cir.

Hoffman Estates, IL. 60169

AFFIDAVIT

{Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1446 (a)}

I Carlen Colbert. being first duly sworn on oath depose and states in support of Emergency Motion to Supplement Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judge Elizabeth E. Loza et al. & Attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws” Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Treason” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Mandatory Injunction prohibiting State County courts from entering any judgments Instanter and Vacate all orders Void in nature against the Plaintiff.

{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}

Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;

1.) The 7^th Cir. Held that the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;

TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW

The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928).

A- In addition, when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

That Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed— Judges are bound by this rule before their court orders are valid;

Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:

The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

“Whenever in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States….”

1.) That on Thursday Feb. 22, 2018, Petitioner appeared before the court on the 10:30am call where judge Loza was informed that this matter was in federal court and asked why was she here? Judge Loza’s reply was that “she did not care and that she was here and we are going forward”

2.) Judge Loza became a “Private Citizen” a law unto herself entered an unsigned court order placing her in contempt of court threatening remand Monday Feb. 26 2018 if plaintiff don’t allow herself to be extorted by former judge bender giving him $100.00 for all unlawful legal proceedings had against the Plaintiff abducting her child from her;

3.) Hereto attached, Court Order not signed demonstrating judges in the Democratic party “Trespassing upon the laws willfully and wantonly, not fearing any admonishment from any federal judges overseeing this matter.

4.) That because of the aforementioned parties colluding in an “Organized Conspiracy” violating more laws does not seem to phase them one iota, judge Loza and the other conspirators are going to continue to “Trespass upon the Laws” until they are stopped with Federal intervention.

Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4the ed. 1992).

Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions. BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1^st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

A- That because Judge Pamela Elizabeth Loza and a plethora of other Democratic Terrorist judges in the political machine are exercising laws outside of their immunity (oath) and jurisdiction and in accordance to other Political/Fraternal laws makes every Court order signed by all Judges in this matter, State levels Void Orders a “Nullity” due to “Treason”;

U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S.

2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—

U.S.

v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.

Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.

CONSPIRACY

Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2 A for violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).

Wherefore the foregoing stated within Plaintiff Respectfully Prays for the Relief:

1.) That this Most Honorable Court Remand Judge Pamela E. Loza et al, attorneys and all conspirators into custody Instanter for “Trespassing upon the Laws”;

2.) Order that minor child be returned to the Plaintiff Instanter;

3.) Order the Grand Jury to investigate and Indict all other parties associated in said Conspiracy and the persons responsible for additional charges;

4.) Order the Removal of every Public Official named and ignored the Oath and Constitution of their duties as an elected/appointed official in this matter, who has “trespassed upon the laws”;

5.) Issue an Injunction on the Feb 22, 2018 and all other orders Prohibiting the County judges, City or State Officials from issuing any judgments against the Plaintiff;

6.) Order Sanctions against all parties and have them to absorb all legal expenses and costs for the enforcement of this matter;

7.) Order a Moratorium on all Child Support’ Custody matters ascertaining other men or women victimized by the same unjust matters;

8.) Let the Gavel and Jurisdiction of this Honorable Court Invoke any other remedy this courts deems just;

FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

Respectfully Submitted

_______________________

Carlen Colbert

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Carlen Colbert Civil Action #17-cv-08467

Hon: Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

Plaintiff

Magistrate: Judge Susan E. Cox

Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy

C. Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker

Defendants

AFFIDAVIT

I Carlen Colbert Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the same to be true.

I have caused Michael I Bender to be served via Malu Radcliff at his office 70 West Madison on Feb. 22, 2018 at 3:15pm where security registered my name before accessing Mr. Benders office.

I have caused Anton Colbert to receive priority mail apprising him of all matters before July 26^th 2018.

Respectfully Submitted Notary

____________________

Carlen Colbert

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Carlen Colbert Civil Action #17-cv-08467

Hon: Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

Plaintiff

Magistrate: Judge Susan E. Cox

Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy

C. Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker

Defendants

AFFIDAVIT

I Joe Louis Lawrence acting as a Special Process Server in this matter being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he believes the same to be true.

I have caused Timothy C. Evans, Grace Dickler and Debra Walker to be reserved via Chief judges clerk Lou Piechuta at 11:05 am Feb. 26, 2018, where it has been a normal practice all judges copies been received by said Chief Judges clerk.

Respectfully Submitted Notary

____________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Thursday, February 22, 2018

DEMOCRATIC JUDGE PAMELA E. LOZA CORROBORATING HER ROLE TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES IGNORING AND NOT CARING CASE IS BEFORE FEDERAL JUDGE;

LOZA THREATENED MRS. COLBERT IF SHE DID NOT HAVE $100 MONDAY FEBRUARY 27, 2018 SHE WAS REMANDING HER INTO CUSTODY.

Judge Loza’s reply was that “she did not care and that she was here and we are going forward”

COOK COUNTY JUDGES ARE FLEXING AT FEDERAL JUDGES CHALLENGING THEIR AUTHORITY DARING THEM TO DO ANYTHING TO THEM.

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Carlen Colbert Civil Action #17-cv-08467

Hon: Charles R. Norgle, Sr.

Plaintiff

Magistrate: Judge Susan E. Cox

Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy

C. Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker

Defendants

NOTICE OF EMERGENCY MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT

REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER

MANDATORY INJUNCTION PROHIBITING STATE AND COUNTY COURTS FROM ENTERING ANY JUDGMENTS INSTANTER AND VACATE ALL ORDERS VOID IN NATURE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF

To the most Honorable Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District:

That on Feb. 23, 2018, Plaintiff shall present this Motion at 9:30 am before Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. in room 2338A, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL. 60604;

To: Dir. Chris Wray FBI 601 4^th Street Washington D.C. 20535

US Attorney, John R. Lausch, Jr. 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

To: Pamela E. Loza 50 West Washington, Chicago, IL 60601 Room 3009;

Michael I. Bender, 70 West Madison, Suite 2222 Chg. IL 60602,

Timothy C. Evans 50 West Washington, Chg. IL. 60601 Room 2600;

Anton Colbert, 140 Percy Julian Sq., Oak Park, IL. 60302-2619

Grace Dickler 50 West Washington, Chg, IL 60601 Room 1905;

Debra B. Walker, 50 West Washington, Chg. Il 60601 Room 2108

PLEASE BE ADVISED that on February 22, 2018 A Emergency Motion to Supplement Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al have been filed with all attachments before the United States District Courts.