DELIBERATE DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE FOR THE LAWS BY DEMOCRATIC JUDGES IN ILLINOIS:
HERE IS A CASE WHERE WHITE MEN CONTROLLING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS RECRUITED THE NEW BLACK WOMAN AS BLACK MEN HAVE ASSUMED ROLES PROTECTING WHITE MEN IN THE MANNER ONCE UPON A TIME WOMEN PROTECTED THEIR MEN.
A FEMALE LAW PROFESSOR WAS ON A CASE IN THE DALEY CENTER APPROACHED ME YEARS AGO AND SAID AS GOOD LOOKING AS I AM SHE DON'T SEE WHAT ALL OF THE FUSS IS ABOUT YOU ARE A MANDINGO THESE JUDGES ARE CRAZY ABOUT MEN LIKE YOU, I LOOKED AT HER AS IF SHE WAS CRAZY MY MOUTH WAS WIDE OPEN, SHE STATED IN SHOCK, YOU REALLY DON'T KNOW, I EXPLAINED HOW A POLICE OFFICER IMPREGNATED HIS BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER AND ED BURKE RECRUITED JUDGES TO COVER IT UP AND PROTECT HIM AND FRAMED ME THEY TOOK MY CTA BADGE OFF MY BODY WHILE, I WAS HANDCUFFED TO KEEP FROM PAYING ME MY WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION THEY HAD A WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION ATTORNEY WHO HAD WORKED FOR CTA THEY PUT HIM ON THE BOGUS PATERNITY CASE AND HE ISSUED A BOGUS WARRANT AGAINST ME.
THE LAW PROFESSOR SAID OH MY GOD! NOW I UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON, SHE SAID WOMEN HAVE A HARD TIME GOING IN FRONT OF THESE MEN REGARDLESS TO THEIR SKIN COLOR THESE ARE THE GOOD OL BOYS YOU HAVE A HELLAVU FIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU.
IN 1993 CASE 93 L10772, I WENT BEFORE JUDGE WILLARD K. LASSERS WHILE I WAS OFF WORK INJURED ON DUTY A DRUNK POLICE OFFICER RAN INTO THE BACK OF MY BUS AND TOTALED HIS VAN, I HAD A LUMBAR SPRAIN IN MY LOWER BACK (JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA THE SEVERITY OF THE INJURY, I USE TO DO ONE HAND PUSH UPS 25-30 ON EACH ARM BEFORE I PLAYED CHESS WITH ANY OF THE OPERATORS WHEN I WAS AT 69TH ASHLAND GARAGE, AFTER THE INJURY I WAS NOT ABLE TO DO 1 PUSH UP WITH 2 HANDS)
I FILED A WRONGFUL DISCHARGE COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CTA BECAUSE CTA HAD SAID I WAS DISCHARGED BUT, I NEVER HAD ANY PROOF MY DAUGHTER WAS 2 YEARS OLD AND SHE HAD AN EAR INFECTION AND OSCO WAS NOT ABLE TO FILL HER PRESCRIPTION BECAUSE CTA SAID THAT, I WAS NOT AN EMPLOYEE, I LEARNED KENT STEPHEN RAY AND CHERYL COOK NIGGROE WOMAN HAD FALSIFIED PAPERS THIS WAS EXPLAINED TO THE JUDGE, KEN STOOD BEFORE THE JUDGE DEMONSTRATING AN OBVIOUS FEMININE FLAIR, JUDGE LASSERS TOLD HIM TO TAKE THAT SMIRK OFF OF HIS FACE IN AN ANGRY TONE, HE TOLD KEN WHEN WE COME BACK TO COURT THIS MATTER BETTER BE STRAIGHTEN OUT BUT THE JUDGE SAID, I DON'T THINK YOU BELONG HERE BUT I AM GOING TO HELP YOU.
WE WENT BACK TO COURT THIS TIME IT WAS ANOTHER JUDGE A TRUE BLUE RACIST IRISHMAN, HE CALLED ME GARBAGE ASKED WHO THE HELL DO I THINK, I AM PREPARING THIS GARBAGE? I AM LIKE WHAT THE HELL, I OBJECT YOUR HONOR WHO IN THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE TALKING TO? KEN DID THE SAME ROUTINE HE RAISED HIS ARMS LIKE A WOMAN AND SAID YOUR HONOR HE THINKS THEIR IS SOME TYPE OF GRAND CONSPIRACY AGAINST HIM AND BESIDES HE HAS NO PROOF OF ANY DISCHARGE THIS IS A UNION MATTER--JUDGE PATRICK MCGANN LITERALLY SNAPPED, HE ASKED ME WHAT PROOF DID I HAVE SHOWING THAT, I WAS DISCHARGED? I SADI THEY SAID THE EMPLOYEES OF CTA HE GOT UP LIKE HE WAS COMING DOWN FROM THE BENCH TO WHIP MY ASS A BIG BROTHER BLACK DEPUTY STOOD UP SO AS TO PREVENT THE JUDGE FROM COMING PAST HIM.
MC GANNS LAST COMMENT WAS THAT YOU NEVER COME INTO NO COURT ON HEARSAY!
THE DEPUTY SAID THIS HAVE TO BE REPORTED THEY DEMOTED THE JUDGE TO TRAFFIC COURT FROM THE LAW DIVISION BUT KEN WAS NOT THROUGH FUCKING WITH ME BEHIND THE SCENES.
I HAD PROVIDED LOCAL 241 ALL OF MY DOCUMENTS PROVING MY EMPLOYMENT WITH CTA MEDICAL STATEMENTS EVERYTHING INCLUDING MY GRIEVANCE TO MICHAEL SIMMONS WHO WAS THE SECRETARY, HE KEPT TELLING ME WE ARE WAITING ON THE CTA TO GET BACK WITH US BECAUSE THEY SAID YOU WERE TERMINATED.
I FOUND OUT LATER BY NUMEROUS OPERATORS THAT MICHAEL SIMMONS AND KEN HAD AN ALLEGED INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP MICHAEL SIMMONS WAS HELPING CTA NOT PAY EMPLOYEES THEIR WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION OR TERMINATED THEM WHILE OFF WORK INJURED ON DUTY.
VALDERRAMA TRIED INTIMIDATING AND BULLYING ME BUT WHAT HE DIDN'T KNOW EVERY MOVE HE MADE WAS ANTICIPATED MY WHITE COLLEAGUES ALREADY INFORMED ME THAT NO BLACK MAN OR IRISH WHITE MAN ON ANY ACCORD WAS GOING TO RULE IN MY FAVOR.
THERE ARE MORE MEN WITH WIVES LIVING IN THE CLOSET THAN MANY REALIZE SITTING ON THE BENCH AND THE WOMEN JUDGES KNOWING THAT NO MAN IS GOING TO ADMONISH THEM FOR ANYTHING THEY DO TO INNOCENT VICTIMS COMING TO THEIR COURTS BULLY PEOPLE LIKE LOZA.
LOZA IS NO DIFFERENT FROM NIGGROE FORMER PRESIDING OR SUPERVISING JUDGE R. MORGAN HAMILTON WHEN I WAS FORCIBLY RECUSING WILLIAM STEWART BOYD, MY FORMER ATTORNEY WHO ALLEGEDLY GOT AN ASSOCIATE JUDGE POSITION FROM BURKE WHEN HE LEARNED THAT MY PATERNITY CASE WAS BOGUS HE ACTED LIKE HE DIDN'T REMEMBER ME WHEN HE PRESIDED OVER MY CASE IN A DIVORCE PROCEEDING.
THE CHOICES WERE BERNSTEIN WHO ALLEGEDLY HATED HISPANICS AND HAMILTON WHO ALLEGEDLY HATED BLACK MEN HAMILTON STATED, YOU ALL STILL HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THAT NIGGER? GIVE THAT NIGGER TO ME IN FRONT OF DEPUTIES JUDGES EVERYONE.
THIS FRATERNITY OF JUDGES ARE NOTHING BUT TERRORIST PERPETRATING THEIR HATRED DOCTRINES ON HETEROSEXUALS AND ABUSING WOMEN AND THE ELDERLY BECAUSE THEY ARE COWARDS, THUGS USING THEIR ROBES AND POWER TO INFLICT MAYHEM ON THE INNOCENT.
THE CLERKS HAVE DESCRIBED VALDERRAMA AS A RENEGADE!
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16 CV 7434
Hon: Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE DUE TO JUDGE VALDERRAMA TRESPASSING UPON
THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE DISTRICT COURT ORDER “VOID” A “NULLITY”
SAID JUDGE PRESIDED OVER A CASE HE HAD
NO JURISDICTION ACTING AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING HIM
INTO CUSTODY w/AFFIDAVIT
Now
comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully
represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in
support of Motion for Reinstate case et al;
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
_________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312
965-6455
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
STATE OF
ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF
COOK )
AFFIDAVIT
IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE DUE TO JUDGE VALDERRAMA TRESPASSING UPON
THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE DISTRICT COURT ORDER “VOID” A “NULLITY”
SAID JUDGE PRESIDED OVER A CASE HE HAD NO JURISDICTION ACTING AS A PRIVATE
CITIZEN
1.
I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Petitioner in this cause,
being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;
2.
That on August 8, 2016 Judge John W. Darrah who has
demonstrated venomous racial hatred against the Petitioner denied his complaint
citing U.S.C. 1915 (e) (2) (B) (ii) as being frivolous
A- That
Judge Darrah did everything outside of his jurisdiction “Trespassing upon the Laws” making sure Petitioners complaint never
crossed the threshold of the United States Marshall’s serving the parties due
to the Petitioner being indigent legally homeless and on Public Assistance
denied him legal representation and the right to proceed in forma pauperis Dec.
12, 2016;
B- Unbeknown
to Darrah he had “Trespassed upon the
Laws” and became a “Private Citizen”
in this cause engaging in “Treason”;
3.
That Judge Darrah exhausted a lot of legal muscle
dictating to the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit, in that said matter was
unlawfully dismissed case 16-3972 because Petitioner failed to pay $505.00, in
that judge Bauer knew Petitioner was able to Brief any matter in that
Petitioner out briefed the law professors and various city attorneys and law
firm recruited from Missouri trying to out maneuver him litigiously
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
When judges act when they do not
have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a
judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are
engaged in treason (see below).
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him
any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state
officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
4.
That pursuant to the aforementioned laws by the United
States Supreme Court every order entered against the Petitioner are deemed a
“Nullity” simply “Void”
Hereto attached Gr Ex A, (filed Oct. 30, 2017) Motion
to Reinstate Default & Summary Judgment due to Judge Valderrama Trespassing
upon the Laws Committing Treason making the Order “Void” a “Nullity”
w/Affidavit;
5.
That Judge Valderrama had an unlawful impromptu hearing
(Nov. 13, 2017 at 9:30) on said matter that was before calendar 6 never
reassigned to calendar 3;
A- Petitioner
was informed by a very reliable clerk familiar with this matter, that this case
was never properly reassigned back to Calendar 3 which is Valderrama everyone
is waiting to see if he is going to transfer this matter to the presiding judge
which is why he is taking a long time coming out of chambers;
B- He
even already had a court order already typed up told the attorneys they did not
have to prepare the order they looked at him strangely, hereto attached as Ex B;
C- Petitioner
was confused as to what was going on because the case was up
for 9:00am and the judges
demeanor was off key somber as opposed to being cocky with an abrasive temperament no
way reflective of wearing a robe;
D-
6.
That Pursuant to Gr
Ex B Court Transcript, Page 3 Lines
20-24, Page 4 Lines 1-4, Mr. Novay stated, “Judge, this is Christian Novay. And just for the record there was some
confusion. The notice I got was actually before Judge Gamrath, which I appeared
in front of this morning. They acknowledged they had the case on, but have no
other information about it. They did kindly refer me to your courtroom this
morning. I understand it was being called. I’m not sure what the confusion is
there”.
7.
That Pursuant to Page
4 Lines 5-17, Valderrama stated, “I
can explain the confusion because apparently in the clerk’s system,
unfortunately when the case –the case was originally transferred to Judge Mikva
for ruling on a motion for substitution or change of judge for cause I believe,
going back in time now. On the way back after Judge Mikva ruled on the motion,
it was improperly coded by the clerk, and instead of transferring it back to
this court, I think properly—I mean, I know we have proceedings, but I think it
was not properly coded. So the motion being spindled was spindled for that room
meaning, Judge now Gamrath, but it is a calendar 3 case”.
A- The
clerks under the authority of Cook County with integrity resented Valderrama
implicating them as being guilty of incompetence or anything related to
anything remotely related to impropriety provided Petitioner a court order,
hereto attached as Ex C March 17,
2016 COURT ORDER;
B- IT IS ORDERED THAT This case is
transferred to Calendar 6, Judge Mikva for the sole purpose of hearing
the Petition for Substitution of Judge for Cause. Upon resolution of the
Motion, the case shall be returned to the Presiding Judge and it is properly
certified with a signature by Judge Mosche Jacobius.
8.
That Pursuant to Page 6 Lines 1-24 Petitioner argued, “It’s indicated throughout the affidavit how Counsel and the other
defendants had, in fact, been properly served pursuant to the law, 735 and the
Cook County Sheriff. All of that information is there, and it’s further
indicated to show fraud upon the Court the complaining party must establish
that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process
either because the Court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the Court Alexander vs Robertson 882 F 2d 421, 9th
Circuit 1989”.
“So pursuant to the Supreme Court Rules of Illinois, even if Counsel
was not aware of what was going on, the officers of the Court had a duty and
obligation to let the Court know, if they in fact received service. So the
Court’s orders were in fact predicated on being induced in terms of reliance.
So if the Court issues orders based upon misrepresentations, the order—the law
is clear what trespassing is in fact the law. And the state judge has a duty to
follow the laws of the state of Illinois, to follow his oath, and not just make
orders arbitrary to their own opinion or their own disposition”.
9.
That Pursuant to Page
7 Lines 1-4 Mr. Novay stated, “I
guess if I could just supplement, what I would say then, I agree with what
Counsel is saying”.
For the Record: Valderrama referenced Yuleida Joy the attorney representing K2
apartments not Julieta Huff she never opened her mouth objecting to anything
Petitioner argued before the court.
10.
That Pursuant to Page 7 Lines15-16 Valderrama stated, “You have the last word Mr. Lawrence”
11.
That Pursuant to Page 7 Lines 17-24 Page 8 Lines 1-3 Petitioner stated, “Yes Sir, the Court had to have jurisdiction
in order to deny a case beyond March 30th If it is brought to the
Court’s attention that there was some errors and the Court continuously goes
forward without considering the laws and the evidence that’s there, that is a
that’s void. When judges’ act, when they do not have jurisdiction to act or
they enforce a void order, an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction,
they become trespassers of the law and are engaged in treason.”
12.
That the Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans having
cognizance he has no control or authority over many of the Cook County judges “Trespassing Upon the Laws” engaging in
“Treason” sought the authority of a Lake County Circuit Judge Mitchell L.
Hoffman hereto attached, Ex D Tribune
Article “Preckwinkle can’t make chief
judge lay off 155 for now judge rules”
13. That
a former Judge criticized outspoken Lesbian, “Mihalopoulos Without clout judge says no appeal in boring job”,
hereto Attached, Gr Ex E
14. That
Valderrama having demonstrated his allegiance working for a Terrorist cell
where Chief Judge, Presiding Judge and States Attorney received Notice and
Knowledge of all Treason offenses did nothing; thereby validating the verity he
received his orders and instructions from other Terrorists operating outside of
his judicial oath stated, Page 9 Lines
22-24, Page 10 Lines 1-10, “All
right. Having heard plaintiff’s motion, having read plaintiff’s motion, the
Court is going to deny the motion. I have prepared an order that reflects the
Court’s ruling as to the basis as to why it’s being denied. This case was –
first of all, the motion is improperly noticed in terms of the room number,
2305 rather than 2401. Secondly, more importantly, the motion is untimely. This
case was dismissed for want of prosecution back in October 20, 2016. This
motion was filed October 30, 2017, that’s more than a year ago. That’s the
Court’s ruling”
15. That
Pursuant to Gr Ex F if Valderrama
has deluded himself into believing he is some type of special black
irresistible chocolate to some white man in the closet needs to read Gr Ex F in its entirety, Pars 3-4 is unequivocal no man gay
straight in the closet or otherwise is capable of saving anyone;
16. How can a man acting as a “Private Citizen”
no longer a judge being appointed or elected to their positions after “Trespassing upon the Laws” have
subject matter jurisdiction over an officer of the court be it Pro se or
licensed attorney as they prosecute the laws in accordance to the laws of the
United States Constitution and not arbitrary to political or sexual orientation
values notwithstanding any unlawful fraternal affiliations?
A- The
answer is the judge cannot because so many have purchased their law licenses
for a nominal fee or slept their way with powerful white men “Organized in
Politics”, politically appointed is all the reasons why the courts are in
the shapes they are in because the Democrats have demonstrated a machine
application of allowing judges to “Trespass
upon the Laws” systematically circumvent the United States Constitution by
enforcing “Jim Crow” laws
outlawed by the United States Constitution as a normal practice.
B- In
that those would be persons willing to exercise the laws of the constitution
are prohibited due to members of the terrorist cell Democratic machine control
their employment and their pay checks.
17. That
because of the aforementioned is all the reasons why Gr Ex F was prepared so as to seek a Federal Circuit with some “Light”
(Justice) before the courts because there is no Light in Illinois courts only Darkness
(Corruption);
18. That Defendants
having admitted to all facts recorded in said Complaint et al. via affidavit
and Court Transcripts;
A-
Court having no jurisdiction to Dismiss valid Prove up Default
& Summary Judgment March 30, 2015, due to Judge Valderrama corroborating
his role engaging in “Treason” “Trespassing upon the Laws” hereto
attached , March 30, 2015 Court Order.
B-
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish
that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process,
either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
C-
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates
disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating
court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to
accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s
indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with
our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its
citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
A-
Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v.
United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v.
C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question
that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the
procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328
U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth
such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.
v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v.
Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto)
61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
B-
“A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A
judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and
lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a
nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no
judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at
any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44,
45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d
227-232
C-
“A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal
efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and
effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in
any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked
at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v.
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st
Dist. 1964)
Chronology of Facts: Plaintiff with due-diligence filed Motions to
Disqualify Judge Valderrama for “Cause” due to “Fraud” et al. Judge Neil Cohen
and Judge Mary Lane Mikva Denied Plaintiffs’ Motion; Deeming said Orders a
Nullity Void.
Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate
Court where Judges James F. Smith, Cynthia Y. Cobb, David Ellis and Nathaniel
J. Howse, Jr. Denied Plaintiffs Motion corroborating “Fraud” and Domestic
Terrorism in the courts. Deeming said Order a Nullity Void.
Plaintiff appealed the Sup. Ct. of Ill. For A Writ of Mandamus/Supervisory Order
someone corrupt as hell mailed to Plaintiff a blank court Order Denying said
Motion. Deeming said Order a Nullity Void.
Plaintiff Appealed
to the Appellate Court where Honorable Rodolfo Garcia, Thomas Hoffman, John
Owen Steele, Patrick J. Quinn former Governor Pat Quinn’s brother, Themesis
Karnezis, Mary K. Rochford, Warren D. Wolfson who is related to Loretta
Higgins- Wolfson, Mathias W. Delort, Bertina Lampkin, Sebastian Patti, Shelvin
Louise Marie Hall, Joy Cunningham, Mary Jane Theis, who had a father convicted
in the Greylord sting as a judge, Michael Murphy all were complicit in
covering-up criminal Civil Rights violations of a “Bogus” paternity case 88 D 079012, said judges ignored every
unchallenged affidavit issued orders outside of their provisions of judicial
immunity, Deeming all Orders a Nullity Void;
The original
case number is 85 D 068184 many tried destroying the entire case file and
signed court order by judge D. Adolphus Rivers when Richard M. Daley was the
States Attorney where it was DISMISSED.
The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate
has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or
execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v.
Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
A- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,
1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
Since
judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges they become
principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since
no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been
convicted, the other judges are The criminal activities that the Federal Courts found in the
Circuit Court of Cook County still exist, and are today under the care, custody
and control of Judge Timothy C. Evans (Chief Judge). The Circuit Court
of Cook County remains a criminal enterprise.
JUDICIAL
IMMUNITY
Judges
have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges
have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving
with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
Judicial immunity does not exist
for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid
and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages
sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with,
aiding and abetting, another judge's criminal activity.
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The
Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such
jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his
process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson,
57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not
have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a
judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are
engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates
v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D.
Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his
judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an
intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse."
When a judge acts as a trespasser
of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses
subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no
legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer
v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that
"when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the
Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority
of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the
consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him
any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state
officer.
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
D- That
because Judge Franklin U. Valderrama “Trespassed
upon the Laws” engaging in an “Organized
Conspiracy” committing “Treason”
unlawfully Denied Plaintiff’s valid Motion for Default & Summary
Judgment March 30, 2015 validating the
verity said judge was acting as a PRIVATE CITIZEN AND NOT A STATE OFFICER;
E- That
Judge Valderrama acting as a PRIVATE
CITIZEN for the Defendants “Trespassed
upon the Law” signed an order for the City of Chicago after the fact
allowing the Defendant City of Chicago to Vacate the Technical Default (April
3, 2015, hereto attached) making the order a “NULLITY” VOID IN IT’S ENTIRETY;
F-
That Judge Valderrama acting as a PRIVATE CITIZEN for the Defendants “Trespassed upon the Laws” signed an Order for K2 Apartments
Dismissing Plaintiffs Motion (October 20, 2016, hereto attached,) making the
order a “NULLITY VOID IN IT’S ENTIRETY;
That
because of the above; Fraud
admissibility great latitude is
permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a
question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great
latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts
allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of
inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V.
Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
G- In Reference to Case # 17-CV-05482, In the matter of Lee Oties Love, Jr. v. Sup. Ct. of
Ill. Pamela E. Loza, Luciano Panici, James P. Murphy, Joshua P. Haid. Page 6, Par.4 Judge Thomas Panici had charged Plaintiff with a DUI case et
al…….Plaintiff never appeared before this judge and he does not drink., in that
Judge Sharon Coleman a Black female Democrat closed her eyes to the plethora of
heinous Civil Rights violations demonstrating where judges had “Trespassed
upon the Laws” judge Coleman stated, “she
had no jurisdiction”;
She trespassed
upon the Laws saying the Plaintiff dismissed his own case when in fact she
dismissed his case without prejudice.
Plaintiff
Appealed to the 7th Cir. Case
#17-2731 judges William J. Bauer, Michael S. Kanne, Diane S. Sykes entered
an order requesting Plaintiff submit a Brief Memorandum stating why this appeal
should not be dismissed.
The
aforementioned judges dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction said judges
closed their eyes to the plethora of violations demonstrating Cook County
judges acting as “Private Citizens” Trespassing
upon the Laws”.
Plaintiff
filed a Motion for Reconsideration Vacate (August 8, 2017) Order due to
Error Trespassing Upon the Laws Making the Order Void A Nullity w/Affidavit
& Reinstate Complaints.
That
said matter was in fact properly noticed for Nov. 1, 2017 at 8:45 am, that said
judge did not entertain the Motion because her deputy clerk stated, “that it was not properly noticed”.
That
Plaintiff having Re Noticed the matter to Nov. 14, 2017 at 8:45 am, no attorney
appeared to rebut any of the allegations in the motion said judge dismissed the
motion with prejudice claiming she had no jurisdiction said judge made a
disturbing remark on the record demonstrating black judges are only figureheads
Rather
than uphold the laws of the
United States Constitution Judge Coleman said she needed permission from the
judges upstairs on whether she had jurisdiction
H- In
Reference to Case # 17-CV-08060, In
the matter of April Redeaux v Karen Bowes, Gordon Nelson, Steve Wasko, Clarence
Parker, Grace Dickler, Debra B. Walker, Gregory Emmett Ahern, Jr. judge entered
a minute order Nov. 14, 2017 setting a status Hearing for Jan. 11, 2018, Lead
counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing.
When the judge learned of the
Plaintiffs ethnicity being black non white she dismissed her case called her
complaint frivolous fanciful etc. whereby said Federal judge closed her eyes to
the Cook County judges Trespassing upon the laws engaging in Domestic
Terrorist Acts of Treason.
I- In
Reference to Case # 17-CV- 08467, In
the matter of Carlen Colbert v Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy C.
Evans, Grace Dickler, Anton Colbert, Debra B. Walker. Plaintiff in this matter
had her child abducted by judges and given to her brother where ex judge
Michael I. Bender had falsified documents alleging she abused her child to
justify Loza granting her child to her brother.
In that on Dec 6, 2017 Michael
Bender tried having the above Plaintiff remanded into custody for not paying
him legal (extortion) fees, in that she had a fee waiver 298, he eloquently
fabricated inducing reliance on the court judge Loza surprisingly refused but
it was gleaned that the sons father was being garnisheed by Bender at $800.00 a
month.
The above Plaintiff lost her job
(Dec 6, 2017) due to excessive absences reporting to court seeking to get her
son and is now indigent.
J- In
Reference to 16-cv- 08628, In the
matter of U S Bank National Association et al. v Monzella Y. Johnson et al. A
plethora of attorneys working for certain banks tried stealing elderly
Plaintiffs home in the unlawful disguise as foreclosure.
Democratic judge Samuel
Der-Yeghiyan closed his eyes to the Terrorists acts perpetrated by Judges and
attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws” refused to allow summons be issued
upon the Plaintiffs returned the case back to the “Criminal Enterprise”
That under Case # 2008 CH 33616 former Alderwoman now
judge demonstrated her allegiance as a Domestic Terrorist Trespassed upon the
laws September 1, 2017 accepting false documents from the law firm Potestivo as
they all corroborated their roles engaging in Treason trying to steal said home.
That on Dec 6, 2017 Fredrrenna
Lyle as a “Private Citizen” granted
U.S. Bank Summary judgment to the aforementioned Plaintiffs home.
K-
“That
because many are aware Chief judge being a Negroe realized he had no real authority caused
many ethnic groups to come along and “Trespass
upon the Laws” destroy black and brown families, use the laws as Ropes
and Water hoses as they “Lynched” innocent men or women who stood
up to their Terrorist Acts of injustices in the courts;”
L-
That said
cases demonstrates in multitudes how Judges taking part in various extortion
schemes as “Private Citizens” helping banks steal the home of a retired Chicago
Board of Education teacher and Retired Police Officer and other judges as
Private Citizens in the Domestic Relations Division unlawfully take children
from mothers helping child rep attorneys accrue fees in this extortion
operation ets.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
Joe
Louis Lawrence
__________________
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312
965-6455
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
Under
penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned
certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and
correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief
and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believes the same to be true.
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
P.
O. Box 490075
312
965-6455
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
WHEREFORE the aforementioned
reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.
For an Order Reinstating the Complaint due to all court orders
entered after that date March 30, 2016 deemed a Nullity void;
2.
For an Order issuing a Rule
to Show Cause Remanding Franklin U. Valderrama into Custody Instanter.
3.
For an Order appointing a
Special Prosecutor who understands the jurisdiction of their profession to
investigate and ascertain all other parties complicit in these Terrorist
Treason Offenses of all cases noted within;
4.
For an Order staying any and all legal enforcements of all parties
noted within due to the plethora of Felonies enacted by “Private Citizens”
perpetrating roles as judges Trespassing upon the Laws”
5.
For an Order on bond be
not less than one million dollars for any and all parties charged in these
crimes in warring against the United States Constitution.
6.
For an Order removing the
Chief Judge of Cook County and Presiding judges of all Circuits who as Public
Servants failed to investigate remove or report any judge in accordance to
their oath and Public Duty.
7.
For an Order setting a
Hearing Date for all attorneys who sat by in an idle manner and did not
exercise his or her duties pursuant to the Ethics of R.P.C 3.3 and speak up or
report the terrorist acts perpetrated by “Private Citizens” violating their
oaths as judges.
8.
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Civil Action #16 CV 7434
Hon: Darrah
Plaintiff
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
of Illinois, Alderman
Edward Burke,
Franklin U.
Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva
Defendants
NOTICE
OF
MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE DUE TO JUDGE VALDERRAMA TRESPASSING UPON
THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE DISTRICT COURT ORDER “VOID” A
“NULLITY” SAID JUDGE PRESIDED OVER A
CASE HE HAD NO JURISDICTION ACTING AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” RULE TO SHOW CAUSE
REMANDING HIM INTO CUSTODY w/AFFIDAVIT
Please be
advised that on, December12, 2017
Plaintiff has filed before this District Court, Motion for Reinstatement et al;
and will present said legally sufficient instrument before any Judge in judge Darrah’s stead Dec. 21, 2017, at
am in room .
Chicago
Housing Authority
Wilson
Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of
the General Counsel Christian
T. Novay
Asst
Gen Counsels
55
West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Maria
Sewell Joseph T.B. King
Chicago,
Il 60603
60 East
Van Buren
Chicago,
Ill 60605
Seyfarth & Shaw
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris
Willis/Sears
Tower
Chicago,
Ill. 60603
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602
Cary
G. Schiff & Associates Gordon
& Rees LLP
Christopher
R. Johnson
Goli
Rahimi
Yuleida
Joy
1
North Franklin, Suite 800
134 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1720
Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Lewis
Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
Christian
Novay
550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago, IL. 60661
Chief Judge
Timothy C. Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
Presiding
Judge Moche Jacobius, Room 2403, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Assc.
Judge Franklin U. Valderrama, Room 2402, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Clerk
of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg Ill. 60601
States
Attorney, Kim Foxx, Room 500 Daley Center,
Chg. Ill. 60601
Atty
Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
CHA
Mobility CHA
Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris
Klepper, Executive Dir
Tracey
Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East
Jackson Blvd.
4859
S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago,
Ill 60604
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
CHA
Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Jessie
McDaniel
4859 S.
Wabash
Chicago,
Ill. 60615
Courtesy
Copies:
US
Attorney
FBI Dir. Chris Wray
John
R. Lausch, Jr. 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon
Mark Kirk
Bruce
Rauner 607 East Adams, Suite 1520
100 West
Randolph, Suite
Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Mayor
Deputy
Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel
Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77
West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Hon
Dick Durbin
Judge
525 South
8th St.
Frederick
Bates
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
50 West Washington Room
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Celia C. Gamrath Judge
50 West
Washington Room 2508 Neil Cohen
50 West Washington Room 2308
Alderman
David Moore
Alderman Ed Burke
Alderwoman Carrie Austin
Alderwoman Emma Mitts
Cook
County President
Cook
County Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle
Thomas
J. Dart
118 N.
Clark, Room 517
Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on Dec 12, 2017, A Motion for Reinstatement et al.
has been filed with the Northern District of Illinois and said copies being
served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail;
Respectfully, Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Chicago, Ill 60649
312 927-4210
@joelouis
No comments:
Post a Comment