IT IS EASIER FOR A BLACK MAN TO KILL HIS WIFE BY STABBING HER 40 TIMES AND LEAVING THE KNIFE IN HER MOUTH AND RUN OFF WITH HIS GAY LOVER AND COLLECT $250,000.00 IN LIFE INSURANCE MONEY AND PAY OFF ED BURKE WHO HAND PICKS JUDGES IN THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF CROOK COUNTY THAN FOR A HETEROSEXUAL MAN OR WOMAN INNOCENT RECEIVE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS COURTS.
IT IS EASIER FOR A POLICEMAN TO IMPREGNATE HIS NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTERS AS MINORS AS A PEDOPHILE AND NOT LOSE HIS JOB BY TURNING TO ED BURKE WHO APPOINTED EVERY IRISH OR POLISH RACIST JUDGE IN THE CITY TO TRESPASS UPON THE LAWS AND FRAME AN INNOCENT MAN JOE LOUIS THAN IT IS FOR HIM TO RECEIVE JUSTICE IN CROOK COUNTY CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
IN THIS CASE ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS WHO IS IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT NO BLACK MAN EVER HAS EVER PRESIDED IN THAT CIRCUIT AND AS LONG AS THE IRISH REMAIN IN POWER NO TRUE INTELLECTUAL HETEROSEXUAL MAN WILL ASCEND TO THOSE POSITIONS IN MY OPINION ONLY INFERIOR WOMEN WHO RULE THE WAY THEY ARE TOLD DESTROYING MEN OF COLOR------: Judicial Corruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases: JUDGES DEMONSTRATING TREASON IN F.B.I. FACE CHALLE...: JUDGES DEMONSTRATING TREASON IN F.B.I. FACE CHALLENGING THEIR AUTHORITY JUDGES KENNETH RIPPLE, DIANE SYKES ANN C. WILLIAMS HAVE DEMONSTRAT..
WHEN A PERSON OF ANY ETHNICITY READ THIS DOCUMENT AND HEAR PEOPLE REFERENCE BLACK PEOPLE OF COLOR AS NIGGERS--
Urban Dictionary: Nigger
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Nigger
Nih/./guh/ n. 1. racist term used to discribed any dark skinned people but generally reserved for those of african descent. 2. n. Term used by incredibly ignorant black people to describe themselves but considered racist when used by non blacks. 3. n. Carte blanc to black people to beat non blacks into a coma when used ...Nigger | Define Nigger at Dictionary.com
www.dictionary.com/browse/nigger
The term nigger is now probably the most offensive word in English.
BECAUSE DEMOCRATS IN ILLINOIS BEING CONTROLLED BY THE IRISH HAVE MANAGED TO CIRCUMVENT THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION BY RECRUITING THE NECESSARY AFOREMENTIONED TO SIT IN POSITIONS AS THEY ENFORCE ARCHAIC LAWS OF JIM CROW WHICH HAS BEEN OUTLAWED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
'
NO SELF RESPECTING WOMAN OF ANY CALIPER CAN RECEIVE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS COURTS, IT'S LIKE TRYING TO EAT POTATO SALAD WITH FECES IN IT, YOU CAN NOT, NO MORE THAN A PERSON RECEIVE JUSTICE FROM A JUDGE WHO HAS TRESPASSED UPON THE LAWS.
RACISM SEXISM TERRORISM AND NIGGERCISM HAVE ALL PLAYED A ROLE AS MANY IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION AS JUDGES HAVE ONLY ENDEAVORED IN THAT PROFESSION SO AS TO OPPRESS AND DESTROY THOSE ETHNIC THAT THEY FEEL ARE INFERIOR TO THEM.
WHAT THE DEMOCRATS LACKED ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO SUPPOSEDLY HAD PROFICIENT ACADEMIC CAREERS AS JUDGES WAS AN INTELLIGENT INTERPRETATION OF TREASON OR TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS.
IGNORANCE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THE LAW
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Lee Oties Love, Jr.
Civil Action #17-CV-05482
Judge Sharon J. Coleman
Plaintiff
Mag. M. David Weisman
V
Supreme Court of Illinois, Pamela E. Loza,
Luciano Panici, James P. Murphy, Joshua P. Haid
Defendants
MOTION DISQUALIFICATION
OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDERS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY “TRESPASSING
UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” & TRANSFER THIS
MATTER TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 26
To the Honorable Justices
of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals and Judicial Council:
Complainant
a United States Citizen, Lee Oties Love, Jr., hereby respectfully represents as
Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted
reasons why this matter should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure
and LR40.1 (b) (d) (e3)} with and transferred to another circuit with Affidavit.
The request
for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to
the Judicial Conference under Rule 20
(b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:
Rule 26, it implements the Breyer Committee’s
recommended use of transfers. Breyer
Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a
complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice.
Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious
complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original
council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken
public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the
council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved
council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or
governance of the home court of appeals et al.
Now
comes Lee Oties Love, Jr., Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144,
to show that the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman, William J. Bauer, Michael S.
Kanne and Diane S. Sykes, has a personal bias with compelling evidence demonstrating
said judges “Trespassing upon the Laws” against him because of his skin color
and where legally sufficient Complaint stating a cause how and why this court
has jurisdiction; motions corroborating judicial corruption “fraud” “perjury”
and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the court that the
District Court and Court of Appeals judges ignored the criminal acts of the
Democratic judges and described them as moot upholding Racism, Terrorism and “Treason
as judges Trespassed upon the Laws” in the criminal enterprise known as Cook
County courts.
That said judges are demonstrating
unequivocally this is how traditional Democrats of the Political Machine in this
era and beyond feels towards persons of color and the necessary steps they and their
brethren are willing to sacrifice and enforce keeping persons of color like the
Plaintiff oppressed and treated as a criminal non United States Citizen; and is
attempting to cover up the systemic legal applications of racism judicial
terrorism that Appellant has diligently put before the courts, where judges and
lawyers have participated in said conspiracies and have admitted it pursuant to
all laws recorded.
Based thereon, Plaintiff-Appellant
respectfully moves that the Private Citizens Sharon Johnson Coleman, William J.
Bauer, Michael S. Kanne and Diane S. Sykes proceed no further herein and that
this Honorable Seventh Circuit invoke jurisdiction assign this matter to the
Judicial Council so as to exhaust proper protocol in transferring this ,matter
to another judicial circuit to judges that will honor the laws of the United
States Constitution and it’s rules; due to members of the Democratic Political
Machine seizing control over all courts and certain judges politically
appointed because of their racist hatred of ethnic groups they deem inferior to
them so as to enforce the laws pursuant
to the United States Constitution who is not Bias and understands how to
enforce the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according
to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to hear this proceeding who is not
intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.
Now comes Lee Oties Love, Jr. Pro Se
Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and
accuracy of all statements recorded within.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
U.S. Attorney
John R. Lausch, Jr.
219 South Dearborn Suite
500
Chicago, Ill 60605
Cook County State’s
Attorney Chief
Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx 50 West Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Supreme Court of
Illinois, 200 East Capital Ave. Springfield IL. 62701-1721;
Pamela Elizabeth Loza 50 West Washington,
Chicago, IL 60601, Room 3009;
James P. Murphy 555 West Harrison,
Chicago, IL. 60607, Room 402;
Luciano Panici 16501 South Kedzie Parkway,
Markham IL. 60428, Room 105;
Joshua P. Haid Sears/Willis Tower 233
South Wacker, Chicago IL. 60606 84th floor;
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on December 20, 2017, a Motion to Disqualify judges et al. been filed
before the United States Court of Appeals/Judicial Council.
Respectfully Submitted
_______________________
Lee
Oties Love, Jr.
8435 S. Peoria
Chicago,
IL. 60620
773 783-5691
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
AFFIDAVIT
In support of Motion to Disqualify et al.
In
support of Motion
To Disqualify Sharon Johnson
Coleman, William J. Bauer, Michael S. Kanne and Diane Sykes Judge of the
Northern District of Illinois for Personal Bias or Prejudice “FRAUD” pursuant
to 28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal
Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
Section
1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon
3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;
I am Lee Oties
Love, Jr., a Heterosexual Man, HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES DENIED and ignored IN
ALL COURTS BUT NEVER TRIED being duly sworn on oath states:
1.)
That on July 18, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Complaint stating all
claims why the Federal Court had jurisdiction on said matter and it was
assigned to Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman;
2.)
That Appellant filed a Petition
for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Circuit Judge Pamela E Loza et al. &
Attorneys “Trespassing upon the Laws”
Corroboration in an Organized Chain Conspiracy “Treason” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other
Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment Instanter Mandatory Injunction
prohibiting State County courts from entering any judgments Instanter and
Vacate all orders Void in nature against the Plaintiff.
3.)
That Appellant appeared before Sharon Johnson Coleman
on August 8, 2016;
A- Judge
Coleman became a "Private Citizen”
when she only had her Deputy clerk to notify him via telephone reminding him to
come to court but never notifying the Defendants;
B- That
because of her being a “Private Citizen”
in her rulings Nullified her orders as being Void;
4.) Pursuant
to the August 8, 2017 Court Transcript, Line 19 Judge
Coleman stated, “I need to stop you right
there”, Line 23-24, She stated, “Okay, I have read, read some of it. I read
you even though it looked like a filing” Page 4, Par 11-12, Judge
Coleman stated, “when you dealt with
them, were they – they were judges and it was in court, is that correct?”
Plaintiff’s reply Line 13, “Yes
Ma’am” Lines 14-16, Judge Coleman
stated, “All right. Well, they have
immunity. You cannot sue them for anything that happened in the case. You can’t
sue them personally” Line 18-19
she further stated, “So they cannot---I
have dismiss to them out. I have no jurisdiction over them. Do you understand?”
C- Judge Coleman stated, Page 6, Par 2 “You understand I
answer to the U.S. Supreme Court.”
D-
In
that said judge do not answer to the United States Supreme Court in that she
has ignored all legal precedents from the laws of the United States Supreme
Court corroborating her role as a Trespasser of the Laws engaging in Treason.
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are
regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar
to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v.
Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
5.)
Appellant appealed to the Seventh Circuit demonstrating
all of the inconsistencies errors and how judge Coleman corroborated her role
as a “Trespassing upon the Laws” engaging in “Treason”
6.)
That on August 31, 2017, an Order was mailed to
Appellant Ordering that a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not
be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction et al.
7.)
Judges William J. Bauer, Michael S. Kanne and Diane S.
Sykes became “Private Citizens” Trespassed upon the Laws” ignored all areas of the aforementioned judge
Trespassing upon the Laws” engaged in the same acts ignoring all legal
citations and United States Supreme Court precedents and laws properly filed
with claims being clearly articulated in said Sept 7, 2017 Brief Memorandum;
8.)
That on October 3, 2017, the aforementioned “Private Citizens” corroborated their
roles in an “Organized Conspiracy”
Dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, which is interesting because
said judges’ order is a Nullity Void
in its entirety.
9.) That
Page 2 of the aforementioned order
is quite insidious to phantom “If
plaintiff-appellant Lee Oties Love, Jr. wants this court to review the district
court’s ruling (s), he should go back to the district judge and get a clear
determination from the district judge that the case is at an end—in other word,
that no amendment to the complaint will fix the problem that led to dismissal
of Love’s case. With such an order (and accompanying Rule 58 judgment) in hand,
plaintiff-appellant Lee Oties Love, Jr. may then file a new appeal from that
ruling”.
10.)
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are
regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar
to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v.
Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated
that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against
the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper
v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any judge who does not comply
with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that
Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.
The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
Having taken at least two, if not
three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and
the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation
of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).
11.)
If a judge does not fully comply with the
Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer,
124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in
an act or acts of treason.
B. That
said judges are playing games with the Plaintiff-Appellant using the laws
against him as Weapons of Mass Destruction keeping him oppressed by any and all
means, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights
through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or
otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573,
especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action
is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3),
or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy
was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and
Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of
rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA
5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 th
ed. 1992).
12.)
That pursuant to request Investigate Alderman
Edward and Supreme Court Judge Ann Burke, Page
3 Par 2, “In his book, Mr. Cooley
stated Ed Burke and Anne Burke along with Attorney Pat Tuite fixed a murder
case before judge Maloney. Herbert Cammon’s case was a murder case in which it
was alleged that Herbert Cammon, a gay black man, murdered his wife with the
help of his gay lover by stabbing her over 40 times and leaving the knife
sticking out of her mouth” et al
A- “When the judge refused to withdraw from the
case, he told the judge, “What’s the big deal. It’s only a fucking nigger”
B- “Anne Burke also requested that the judge
withdraw from the case saying”
“My
husband was the one who put you on the bench”
13.)
That Pursuant to Motion to Reinstate Case
Due To Judge Valderrama Trespassing Upon The Laws Committing Treason Making The
Order “Void” A “Nullity” Said Judge Presided Over A Case He had No Jurisdiction
Acting As A Private Citizen Rule To Show Cause Remanding Him Into Custody
w/Affidavit;
A- Page 2 Par. 2, 3 of the aforementioned Affidavit
corroborates and demonstrates Seventh Circuit Court judges as active
participants in an “Organized Conspiracy upholding judges engaging in the
Criminal Enterprise Trespassing upon the Laws”
14.) That Pursuant to the November 7th Court
Transcript, Page 7 Lines 15-25 states,
“I don’t have--- as a District Court—Federal
District Court judge I don’t have the jurisdiction to deal with that. I
understood your plight. I had empathy for it, and I did it without prejudice
even though I didn’t have jurisdiction. The mistake was I should not have done
it without prejudice. I can’t change not having jurisdiction. Without prejudice
means the person can bring it back in front of me. Since I made the
jurisdiction ruling, I should have said with prejudice. Then you could have
appealed my decision on whether or not I had jurisdiction in this building to
the 27th floor”.
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful
act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on
remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat
to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of,
individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation,
intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally
all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728
(Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of
Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional
rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for
improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution
which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants basic constitutional
rights;
B- That Ex
C demonstrates the need for the Justices of another Court of Appeals outside the Seventh Circuit
to invoke jurisdiction in this matter because the present legal system is in
the hands of Domestic Terrorists who have infiltrated the Democratic Political
Machine and is enforcing Jim Crow
laws with their appointed brethren also known as “Good ol Boys” using Afro American Negroes who have allowed
themselves to be whored out as prostitutes upholding the criminal acts of said
Terrorists while everyone in responsible authority turn their heads and close
their eyes to the crimes perpetrated on innocent persons of color and
independent whites as demonstrated in
this case and it is alleged many have secret intimate relations with said
individuals and will never open their mouths about whatever injustices being
perpetrated on innocent persons of color;
The request
for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to
the Judicial Conference under Rule 20
(b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:
Rule 26, it implements the Breyer Committee’s
recommended use of transfers. Breyer
Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a
complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice.
Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious
complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original
council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken
public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the
council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved
council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or
governance of the home court of appeals et al.
That
said judges in the Seventh Circuit
closed their eyes to the legal issues put before them on appeal in
affidavits validating the verity of judges committing Treason Trespassing upon
the laws of the United States Constitution engaging in “WAR” against the United States Constitution making every order
rendered against the Petitioner. If a
judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In
re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she
has engaged in an act or acts of treason;
Civil
Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That
all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United
States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any
previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same
right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce
contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease,
sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit
of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and
penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or
custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14
Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
In the
20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on
constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the
court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court
in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in
interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce
clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities
were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy
v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This
landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart
v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs
v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County
School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington,
D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe).
These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State
Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP
v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960),
slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As the color
line itself solidified at the turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed
on black people clear tactical disadvantages: restricted economic
possibilities, narrow educational opportunities, inadequate housing options,
high rates of death and disablement, persistent unemployment, and unrelenting
poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow represented the race problem described by Gunnar
Myrdal (1898–1987) in
his 1944 treatise The American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that
created the race quandary; whites constructed the obstacles African Americans
confronted, while also blaming them for their conditions, denying them access
to the resources of problem solving, and daring them—under threat of violence—to complain, protest, or advance.
Finally,
protests or challenges to Jim Crow often proved futile, given law enforcement’s complicity in the structure. From
emancipation to the turn of the century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a
paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders,
red shirts, and other white terrorists intimidated African Americans with
personal attacks, school burnings, and lynchings. African Americans rarely
served as policemen, sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the
1950s and 1960s, the connections between municipal and state governments, law
enforcement, and racial violence were well known by officials and citizens
alike. White officers were known to harass black people, disrupt black
neighborhoods, and assault black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied
satisfactory counsel, and serving harsh sentences, African Americans were
further disadvantaged in the courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel,
nor could they serve on juries. When black lawyers could appear in the
courtroom to argue cases, white judges and juries rarely listened. All-white
juries decided against black defendants, even in the most obvious cases of
innocence, but rarely convicted white defendants, despite evidence of guilt.
African Americans—including
the innocent—suffered
the harsher punishments of extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage.
Even women could be placed on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks
across the South.
The
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois
Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna
Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It
is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago
is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The
two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City
Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no
other State can match us.”
Turner 24 F.
Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in
what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The
plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her
former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an
apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the
same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being
transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted
a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in
fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of
the “full and equal benefit of all laws”.
15.) That said case demonstrates multiple acts of
systemic applications of constitutional violations, in that judges and State
Agencies acted as decision makers possessing final authority, Brown v. Bryan
County, OKL., 67 F. 3d 1174 (1995), Stokes v. Bullins, 844 F. 2d 269, 275 (5th
Cir. 1988), Wassum v. City of Bellaire, Texas, 861 F. 2d 453, 456 (5th
Cir. 1988), Benavides v. County of Wilson, 955 F. 2d 968, 972 (5th
Cir.) cert. denied,__ U.S.__, 113 S.Ct. 79, 121 L. Ed. 2d 43 (1992), “Liability
will accrue for the acts of a municipal official when the official possess
“final policymaking authority” to establish municipal policy with respect to
the conduct that resulted in a violation of constitutional rights. Pembaur v.
City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S. Ct. 1292, 1300, 89 L.Ed. 2d 452
A-
That not one African American, Negroe or anyone in
competent authority opened their mouths to admonish anyone associated in these
deliberate heinous acts perpetrated by members of the Democratic Political
Machine, due to them only being figureheads.
16.)
That all Defendant-Appellees have properly admitted to
all facts and pleadings recorded in said complaint and motions via affidavits.
17.)
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
CANON 1
A judge should uphold the integrity and
independence of the judiciary.
The
integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without
fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with
the law, as well as provisions of this code. Public confidence in the
impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to
this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public
confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government
under law.
Wherefore the Foregoing
Reasons,
Plaintiff Prays for the following
relief:
1.) Plaintiff requests that
this Honorable Court of Appeals accept Jurisdiction and Transfer this matter to
another Court of Appeals Circuit where they can Invoke authority Instanter and assign
this matter accordingly and or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights Acts
recorded within.
Finally,
this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”;
Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated
rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government
can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore
those very same laws”)
Federal
Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN:
stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody
Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page
1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press
writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for
corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America,
Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois
Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the
governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FURTHER
AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT
Respectfully
Submitted
______________________
Lee
Oties Love, Jr.
8435 S. Peoria
Chicago,
IL. 60620
773 783-5691
