MANY OF THE AFRICAN AMERICANS WHO ARE IN POWER OR WITH AUTHORITY WOULD MUCH RATHER ASSUME THE POSITION AS POST ERA SLAVES CLOSING THEIR EYES TO THE MAYHEM AND ATROCITIES INFLICTED ON PERSONS OF COLOR CRYING OUT FOR HELP AND SUPPORT.
THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE COULD NOT HAVE MADE IT THIS FAR HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR SO MANY INFERIOR NEGROES SELLING OUT THEIR OWN RACE TO BE ACCEPTED BY RACES OF INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE MADE IT A BUSINESS KEEPING PEOPLE OF COLOR OPPRESSED.
THE SAME RACIAL DISEASE PERPETRATED AT PEOPLE OF COLOR IS NOW DIRECTED AT INDEPENDENT CAUCASIANS AND OTHER ETHNIC GROUPS IN THE FORM OF INJUSTICE BY STEALING THEIR HOMES UNLAWFUL CRIMINAL ACTS ETC.
INJUSTICE IS NOT ONLY AFFECTING PERSONS OF COLORS BUT ALL ETHNIC GROUPS WHO ARE TAKING A STAND AGAINST TYRANNY & JIM CROW.
MILITARY PERSONNEL NEEDS TO BE DEPLOYED AND ERADICATE EVERY PERSON WHO HAS TRESPASSED UPON THE LAWS IN THE COURTS BECAUSE CORRUPTION AND MAYHEM HAS SEIZED ALL GOVERNMENT OFFICES AND COURTS JUSTICE CANNOT EXIST AND WILL NOT EXIST UNTIL THE TERRORIST HAVE BEEN ERADICATED FROM POWER.
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON
JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES
ONE COLUMBUS
CIRCLE, NE
WASHINGTON
D. C. 20544
Monzella Johnson,
Petitioner
07-16-90079
V
Diane P.
Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M.
Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A.
Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.
Respondents
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO “FRAUD”
“TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” OF THE FEBRUARY 23, 2017 DOCUMENT MAILED
AS AN ORDER ABSENT A SIGNATURE w/Affidavit
I Monzella Johnson, Petitioner Pro se hereby files
her Motion for Reconsideration due to “Fraud” et al. Petitions the Honorable
Judicial Conference regarding the aforementioned statutes of violations ignored
by Terrorist in the Washington Bureau (Judicial Conference Committee,
Administrative Office of the United States) who have become complicit in said
foregoing acts, by upholding said Treason Offenses and is trying to protect the
many Untouchable Democrats who have made it a career “Trespassing upon the
laws” engaging in “Treason offenses” because they have for many years been the
majority in power and has engaged in “War” against the United States
Constitution because of the number of insurgents they have had at their disposal
in all Administrative agencies and judges in the fraternal Democratic party;
Statutes: Trespassers of the Laws,
Treason, Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal
Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Judicial Bias, Obstruction of Justice, Judges
Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations, Violations of
the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy,
Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by any
Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the
Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.
1.) That on February 23, 2017, ref as Ex A, an un named person unlawfully
mailed to the Petitioner a document in violation of laws and became a
Trespasser of the Laws
A-
Said
February 23, 2017 Order from the Office of the General Counsel Administrative
Office was not received until Feb. 27, 2017, said order is considered void by
all legal standards of the United States constitution, in that said document
had no signature.
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The Illinois Supreme Court
has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and
those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are
trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328,
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328,
340,
26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928).
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928).
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
2.) That the person who mailed said document on behalf
of the Office of the General Counsel had no idea that they were committing
Treason against the government and is making it clear they don’t care who knows
because the Democrats have been in power so long they have insurgents in the
Administrative Office of the United States courts;
3.) One can infer from these
aforementioned acts, this is the systematic behavior of corrupt white men in power in the Democratic
Machine; further demonstrating how crimes are covered-up in the Seventh Circuit
and in Illinois Courts inciting Terrorist Acts, racial hatred and bigotry
within the Democratic party;
4.) That hereto attached, Gr Ex B, Motion for Disqualification
of Judge-Personal Bias or Prejudice et al. Filed Nov. 14, 2016, Par. 2 supported by affidavit never
objected to or denied judge stated, “Johnson
has not shown that this case is overly complex or difficult et al.” in denying
the Defendants legal representation, that would later prove was a deliberate
attempt to have an International Law firm attempt to bully them in an attempt
to keep others of learning of the racist corrupt practices exercised stealing
their home the court did not want an attorney exposing this fact”;
5.) Defendants are elderly retired civil
servants, a retired Police Officer and a retired Chicago Public School teacher!
6.) That Par 4 of Page 5 of Gr Ex B, states, “That Page 4, Par. 5 (A) further validate the verity
within the Preponderance of the Evidence” that said judge and attorneys
were acting in concert in said “Organized Conspiracy” et al.
7.) That the members within the Democratic
party from these actions have been in power for so long don’t expect no one
from the Republican party or any party to be intelligent enough to come after
them and prosecute them because of the stronghold they have on state agencies
and courts as well as insurgents in the Administrative Office of the United
States;
A-
Perfect
example, cases are still being “FIXED” in
Illinois courts as certain Federal judges are upholding certain judges within
the Democratic party as Trespassers of the laws engaging in Treason, hereto
attached, Gr Ex C, Page 3 Par 2,”That a clerk in Dorothy Browns office altered government records in
the data base at the Daley Center to reflect that Barbara Dutton was not the
attorney who filed a Complaint without filing an Appearance representing (MERS)
Mortgage Electronic Regis. Hereto attached, Page 1 of 31, dated 1-29-2010
printout Motion for Reconsideration due to Fraud & Misrepresentations
to the court filed Nov. 4, 2016;
B-
That
no attorney or judge ever denied or objected to any of the assertions recorded
within accompanied by affidavit;
C-
That
Rule 20 of the Judicial-Council
Consideration of Reports and Recommendations of Special Committees #2F states, “Council Action. Council action must be by written order. Et al……….The
order and the supporting memorandum must be provided to the complainant, the
subject judge, and the Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial Conduct and
Disability. The complainant and the subject judge must be notified of any right
to review of the judicial council’s decision as provided in Rule 21(b);”
D-
That
the aforementioned acts recorded within validates the verity of said judges,
clerks and certain personnel within the Administrative Office of the United
States Courts are “Trespassing upon
the Laws” engaging in “Treason” warring against the United Constitution;
E- That on March 2, 2017, Attorney
General Jeff Sessions said Thursday
that he will recuse himself from investigations related to the 2016
presidential campaign, which would include any Russian interference in the
electoral process.
Speaking at a hastily called news conference at the Justice
Department, Sessions said he was following the recommendation of department
ethics officials after an evaluation of the rules and cases in which he might
have a conflict.
“They said that since I had involvement with the campaign, I
should not be involved in any campaign investigation,” Sessions said. He added
that he concurred with their assessment and would thus recuse himself from any
existing or future investigation involving President Trump’s 2016 campaign.
8.) That because of the veracity of
Petitioners pleadings put before this Judicial Conference validating the verity
of certain judges (majority Democrats) engaging in “Treason Offenses” “Trespassing
upon the Laws” with untouchable arrogance caused someone in the office of
the General Counsel et al. to effect mail fraud and engage in the same criminal
acts complained of validates the veracity that all pleadings were in fact true
and warrants another Judicial Circuit outside of the Seventh Circuit to hear
this matter Instanter;
Petitioner is appealing
to the Commander & Chief President
Donald Trump of the United States
that because of the aforementioned Treason acts recorded within warrants the
President of the United States to issue an Executive –Order fettering out all
Terrorist hiding within the Democratic party engaging in Treason Trespassing
upon the laws and for the Attorney General to collaborate with Federal and
Military Officials making this act a reality apprehending all suspects any and
all judges complicit in the Coup enforcing Jim Crow Laws and Trespassing upon
the Laws engaging in Treason in the State of Illinois.
Petitioner
is appealing to the Honorable
Judicial Conference, for a reversal and remand with instructions assigning
this matter to another Judicial Circuit removing the necessary judges based on
the foregoing stated above who have participated in these Diabolical Terrorist
Acts:
Petitioner
is before the Honorable Judicial Conference
because as a” Pro Se” retired
civil servants who are now elderly women the admissions recorded in this
instrument demonstrates under the Illinois Democratic Legal system Black and
Brown lives don’t matter and the Jim Crow methods are still being exercised as
many are using the laws unlawfully to steal our home as other heinous crimes
are being enforced in Chicago.
Petitioner
is before the Honorable Judicial
Conference because of the color of their skin all defendants have
admitted to all criminal acts and civil rights violations but the judges have
ignored all admissions affidavits, the Laws and laws the United States
Constitution and Plaintiffs Civil Liberties, validating the veracity because
they are elderly African American women their lives or anyone who opposes their
intimidating tactics are subject to the diabolical terrorist acts recorded
within this document according to racial political guidelines;
For all of
the aforementioned reasons is why the Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Conference for
Jurisdiction and Enforcement.
I affirm the
above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted
_____________________
Monzella Y.
Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago, IL. 60615
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON
JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES
ONE COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NE
WASHINGTON
D. C. 20544
Monzella Johnson,
Petitioner
07-16-90079
V
Diane P.
Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M.
Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A.
Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.
Respondents
NOTICE OF
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO “FRAUD”
“TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” OF THE JANUARY 25, 2017 DOCUMENT MAILED
AS AN ORDER ABSENT A SIGNATURE w/Affidavit
I Monzella Johnson, certify that I have on this
day filed said Notice of Motion for Reconsideration et al. Before the Judicial
Conference et al. and noted parties.
President Donald Trump
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC. 20500
To:
Dir. James Comey, FBI Washington D.C.
601 4th
Street Washington, DC 20535
Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and
Disability
Administrative Office of the United States
Courts
One Columbus Circle, N E
Washington D. C. 20544
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on March 8, 2017 A Motion for Reconsideration
et al. has been submitted before the Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial
and Disability.
Respectfully
Submitted
_____________________
Monzella
Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago, IL. 60615
IN THE
UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
Monzella Johnson,
Petitioner
07-16-90079
V
Diane P.
Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans
Anne M.
Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,
Lloyd A.
Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.
Respondents
AFFIDAVIT
I Monzella, files herewith her affidavit as
required by Title 28, United States Code:
I Monzella Johnson, Petitioner/ Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said Motion
for Reconsideration et al. the undersigned certifies that the statements set
forth in this instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Notary
Respectfully
Submitted
_____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave.
Chicago, IL. 60615
No comments:
Post a Comment