Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Wednesday, November 18, 2015


Terrorism is already in Chicago but nobody is acknowledging it because persons of color are mostly affected with the exception of Liberal whites opposing Racial injustice and speaking up against it



1.)     That Par. 1 is not accurate, hereto attached Vol. II #28 Ex I, Vol III #39 demonstrate Racial Discrimination unequivocally along with a plethora of other heinous Civil Rights Violations culminating into Domestic Terrorist Acts;
A-   The judge granted the City’s motion to Dismiss absent a counter-affidavit or legal precedents in the laws that warranted any dismissals and most importantly, the court never mentioned why Plaintiff had to Amend his complaint;

B-   The Judge committed another grave error from , Par. 2, “Plaintiff has yet to file an Amended Complaint” Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint March 4, 2015; furthermore, the court RECORDED the Petition for Rule to Show Cause as being “REPLETE” which simply means Abundantly filled or gorged with food or drink,  and noted another grammatical usage of a word describing the Plaintiff’s Petition as being “INVECTIVE” insulting, abusive, or highly critical language, (the tool of invective is generally employed in both poetry and prose to reiterate the significance of the deeply felt emotions of the writer);




A-   Par 3 the court made an incorrect legal citation, in that the proper laws to have been noted on this order is US Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy, Organized Conspiracy, pursuant to Vol II, page 18, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, et al.

B-   That because of the judges intimate involvement “FIXING” this case he went outside of the judicial provisions of his  immunity by recording false entries in Par 4, Administrative agencies are without Contempt powers as an officer of the court Plaintiff had a duty and legal obligation to  Due-diligently inform the court of corrupt unlawful practices exercised at the Human Rights Commission;

C-   The Judge egregiously stated, Par 5,  “Plaintiff also alleges that Defendants’ attorneys have committed  fraud  on the court  et al.,

D-   That Ex J, K and L demonstrates proper service was had on the defendants, I and J are Summons issued by the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3- 101 et seq pursuant to Motion for Disqualification of judge et al., (April 2, 2015) Group Ex A, Page 4, Line 21-24, Plaintiff “The city clerk’s office in fact served them certified mail. The judge “No. The clerk’s office doesn’t serve anybody by certified mail”. The Judge ignored the Affidavit as Gr Ex B by the Clerk of the Circuit Court providing a printout of all parties properly served a summons and Complaint and printouts of the Cook County Sheriff personally serving all parties the Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al.

E-   That Page 9 Line 22-24 The Judge “there being no evidence of summons and complaint on the housing authority as well as 345 East Ohio”, Page 10 Line 1-2 “the petition is denied as I have no jurisdiction so I can’t even hear it”  

F-    That the Judge became a law unto himself (Motion for Reconsideration et al filed April 21, 2015) Affidavit Page 2-11 unequivocally demonstrated the plethora of ERRORS  the judge made in this case no attorney spoke up with integrity denouncing their participation in the draconian terrorist acts;

G-   Par 6 and 7 of the judge’s order demonstrates the court is in Contempt of the laws by signing orders against the manifest weight of the evidence because of Plaintiff’s skin color and the legal system upholding Racist terrorist acts upon persons of color, the court has used his robe and unlawful authority to assist the perpetrators of said heinous crimes protecting them to continue their Terrorist acts on the plaintiff for standing up to corruption and the aforementioned acts, due to no one admonishing him because Black and Brown lives really don’t matter in this city and he is demonstrating this fact in all of his actions.

H-   The worst part is that the judge has demonstrated a fearless untouchable arrogance because of the Plaintiff’s skin color standing up to Chicago’s Domestic Terrorist he had an order already prepared where the City attorney was not present and did not respond but 420 East Ohio and the CHA has enjoined with the city but CHA and 420 East Ohio appeared Friday the 13th , the court had a 2 page order already prepared DENYING the Petition for Rule to show Cause and ignored the ReNotice Objecting the Dismissal et al. And does not list the attorneys who were present.   






No comments:

Post a Comment