JUDGE GEORGE F. SCULLY, JR ADMITTED HE WAS POSSIBLY THE LAWYER FOR THE DAVIE'S

1.)   THE CASE WAS NOT ON THE CALL---NOT RECORDED IN THE COMPUTER THE CLERK WAS APPROACHED STATED IT WAS NOT ON THE CALL OR IN THE COMPUTER, WHEN A COPY OF THE MOTION WAS PRESENTED WITH THE FILE STAMP RECORDED NOV. 26, 8:37AM, SHE STATED, UPON RECESS SHE WILL BRING IT TO THE JUDGES ATTENTION;  
    A-   DEFENDANT APPROACHED THE HEAD CLERK WHO WAS NOTIFIED OF ALL IRREGULARITIES INFORMED HIM THAT THE FILE WAS PERSONALLY DELIVERED TO THE JUDGES CLERK FRIDAY (NOV. 30) AND FOR DEFENDANT TO PRESENT HIS NAME TO THE CLERK (NAMES OF CERTAIN PARTIES ARE WITHHELD AT LAW ENFORCEMENTS DISCRETION TO PREVENT RETALIATION UPON THOSE NOT APART OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE)

   B-   DEFENDANT RETURNED BACK TO THE COURT BUT SUMMONED THE DEPUTY EXPLAINED WHAT WAS JUST ARTICULATED, HE MADE SURE IT WAS NOT ON THE CALL SHEET PRESENTED A COPY THAT WAS PROVIDED TO THE CLERK--CASE WAS CALLED JUDGE ACKNOWLEDGED THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, SAID HE WAS GOING TO CALL THE CASE AT THE END OF THE 9:30 CALL;

2.)   DEFENDANT MADE AN IMPRESSIVE ORAL DELIVERY THE JUDGES MANNERISM WAS TOTALLY RECEPTIVE, IN THAT A FORMER SUPERVISING JUDGE WAS SITTING IN THE COURT ROOM (HONORABLE MICHAEL W. STUTTLEY)

3.)   JUDGE SCULLY REQUESTED HIS OPINION ON ISSUES IN QUESTION IN DEFENDANT'S AFFIDAVIT 
       A-   THIS REVELATION CAME UP AFTER EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON  PAGE 6 OF THE AFFIDAVIT "PROPERLY ALLEGED FACTS WITHIN AN AFFIDAVIT THAT ARE NOT CONTRADICTED BY COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT ARE TAKEN AS TRUE ET AL.....
       B-   DEFENDANT REMINDED THE COURT HOW HE DISMISSED ALL DOCUMENTS, DENIED SUBPOENA RULE TO SHOW CAUSES;
        C-  CRAIG FULTON ACKNOWLEDGED AND WAS PROPERLY SERVED VIA  CERTIFIED MAIL SEPTEMBER 22, HE NEVER DENIED OR OBJECTED......

4.)   JUDGE SCULLY REVEALED HE WAS THE ATTORNEY FOR A BRANDON DAVIS A STATE REPS SON IF RECALLED CORRECTLY THE FATHER---"WHERE THE THE MOTHER WAS DECEASED" EVERY-BODIES MOUTH IN THE COURTROOM WAS WIDE OPEN LIKE MINE

5.)   HONORABLE STUTTLEY CLEARLY MADE MENTION IF THIS IS CLEAR THE DUTY IS ON THE DEFENDANT ON WHETHER HE WANTS A RECUSAL A SERIES OF OTHER IRREGULARITIES WERE UNFOLDING BECAUSE IT APPEARED THE JUDGE AS AN ATTORNEY WAS UNAWARE CRAIG PRESENTED BOGUS PAPERS THAT LEAD TO THE JUDGES INVOLVEMENT IN THIS MATTER AS A LAWYER.

6.)   JUDGE SCULLY STATED HE HAS BEEN A JUDGE FOR ONLY 4 YEARS AND THIS MATTER THAT WAS PRESENTED BEFORE THE COURT HAS COME UP 4 TIMES SINCE HE HAS BEEN JUDGE; 

7.)   THE JUDGE SAID HE HAVE TO SUSPEND THIS HEARING BECAUSE HE HAVE TO INVESTIGATE THE DOCUMENTS TO SEE IF HIS NAME IS ON ANY DEEDS----
     A-

8.)   THE JUDGE SAID TO MAKE SURE ALL PARTIES NOTICED IN THE MOTION ALONG WITH CRAIG FULTON RECEIVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER---IF THE JUDGE CAN ADMIT HIS ROLE AND INVOLVEMENT SURELY EVERYONE CAN AND MANY HAVE ALREADY ACKNOWLEDGED THERE ROLES IN SAID CRIMES;
   A-   THE BEAUTY OF THIS IS IF THE FBI ASKS THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED IN DEFENDANT'S AFFIDAVIT AND ANYONE LIES THEY CAN BE INDICTED FOR PERJURY;
   B-   THE BEAUTY OF THE UNCONTESTED MOTION ACCOMPANIED BY AN AFFIDAVIT NOT OBJECTED TO OR DENIED WITH A COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT FURTHER TRAPS A PLETHORA OF UNSUSPECTING INDIVIDUALS ENGAGING IN DIABOLICAL HOUSING SCAMS AND OTHER RELATED CONSPIRACIES;

IN CHESS WHEN A KING IS UNDER ATTACK IN 2 WAYS THIS IS DOUBLE CHECK--IT IS CLEAR THE LAW WORKS WHILE OTHERS IN GOVERNMENT SIT BACK AND WATCH CRIMINALS MAKE ASSESS OUT OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM THE FEDS ARE TAKING NOTES AT THE LEVEL OF CORRUPT INCOMPETENCE THAT MUST BE PURGED FROM THE CORRUPTION IN CHICAGO AND WITHIN THE LEGAL TRIBUNALS