#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases
Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts
Search results
Tuesday, November 18, 2025
SEE HOW KENT STEPHEN RAY MANIPULATED HIMSELF TO BEING GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE CTA AND ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY AS A SUPERVISOR COMMITTING EGREGIOUS CRIMES SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION. THIS EXPLAINS WHY NOBODY BLACK OR OF COLOR CAN RECEIVE ANY TYPE OF JUSTICE IN THIS CITY---LOOK AT HOW THIS EVIL HEARTLESS PSYCHOTIC MALE USED HIS ALLEGED LEGAL TALENTS TO GAS LIGHT THE FUCK OUT OF THE ENTIRE JUDICIAL COMMUNITY BY COLLUDING WITH ATU 241 MEMBERS AS SOME OF THEM SOLD OUT THE BLACK BUS OPERATORS FALSIFIED AND DESTROYED EMPLOYMENT RECORDS IN MY CASE KEEPING ME FROM BEING REINSTATED FROM A WORK-RELATED INJURY (DEC 1, 1994) -----IF THAT IS NOT ENOUGH TO STOMACH, HE LEFT THE CTA TO JOIN THE STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE AS AN ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY SUPERVISOR TO ALLEGEDLY HELP WITH THE BACK DATING AND FRAMING ME FOR CHILD SUPPORT BY WAY OF EXTORTION FOR POLICE OFFICER FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER ON A CASE NOT ONLY NOT MY CHILD BUT WAS DISMISSED (SEPT 17, 1987 85 D 068184) AND DEFAULTED IN MAY 1988 NEVER ORDERING ME TO PAY ANY CHILD SUPPORT. KEN IS LIKE A JEFFREY DAHMER OR JOHN WAYNE GACY ONLY HIS DEPRAVED ACTS ARE SHOWCASED IN THE LAWS AND IN THIS CASE.
You have a vicious snake working in the CTA legal system who is using his racial hate and conning manipulative ability to destroy any Black person who challenges the status quo.
Ken Ray has aligned himself with alleged Judges of the Ku Klux Klan or Homosexual/Bisexual arena who hates persons of Color as a Heterosexual Man you will see for yourselves the wickedness and depraved mindset he and his kind has exhausted making sure, I never was properly reinstated.
No Homosexual or Bisexual Black Man will stand up to him and because he is connected to some of the worse alleged Klan judges in Cook County, they do whatever he suggests.
As you can see, I am still a CTA employee Ken has allegedly made it clear to certain employees, I would never be reinstated back to the CTA over his dead body.
I need you Board members to investigate this matter and see for yourselves the egregious injustices, I have experienced under Kent Stephen Ray and his racist colleagues within the judiciary.
Formal Complaint – Kent Stephen Ray Regarding Criminal Misconduct
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board Members
Office of the Mayor (Attention:
Boards and Commissions) 121 North LaSalle Street, Room 406 Chicago, Illinois 60602
and
Mayor Brandon Johnson
City Hall 121 N. LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60602
From: Joe Louis Lawrence PO Box 490075 Chicago, Illinois 60649 312 965-6455 joelouis565@yahoo.com
Date: November 18, 2025Fax
Subject:Request for Investigation – Kent Stephen Ray Criminal Misconduct Violating Civil Rights Using his Position as a CTA General Counsel & Flipping back to the Assisitant States Attorney Office to Violate the Civil Rights trying to make sure, I never was REINSTATED BACK TO THE CTA for his egregious role working with former colleague now judge Ronald Bartkowicz and other judges who hate Black and Brown persons.
Summary of Complaint How Ken S. Ray used the States Attorney and CTA Administration to Access Personal Informationto Assassinate My Character
I am submitting this formal complaint to request an investigation into serious judicial misconduct and potential criminal violations committed by Kent Stephen Ray, Ronald Bartkowicz of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Domestic Relations Division, involving Illegal Court Assembly, Due Process Violations, Corruption Conspiracy, Judges acting as “Private Citizens” Abuse of Authority, Judges forum shopping et al. falsification of a judicial order and interference with my right to due process.
Factual Background
On or about November 14, 2025, Complainant received knowledge that Executive Director Michael J. Deno was a Supervisor with the States Attorney office in Cook County and has compromised the integrity of any investigation with the named judges complicit in Egregious Civil Rights Violations and Treason offenses as his former colleague Kent Stephen Ray 41 years in the legal arena rotating from the CTA and States Attorney as a appointed employee using those positions to cause harm and mayhem on the Complainant destroying documents or any records to undermine any valid litigation put before any judge named in the complaints.
Ocj Chief (Chief Judge's Office)
From:ocj.chief@cookcountyil.gov
To:joelouis565@yahoo.com
Wed, Nov 12 at 12:32 PM
Dear Mr. Lawrence,
I am writing in response to your correspondence to the Cook County Inspector General, which was referred to me for a response. The administrative authority of the chief judge does not include the authority to review decisions made by other judges, direct other judges in their rulings, or intervene in cases assigned to other judges.
If you feel the judge has engaged in misconduct or has demonstrated an incapacity to perform his duties, you may wish to contact the Judicial Inquiry Board at:
Judicial Inquiry Board
555 W. Monroe St, Suite 800-N
Chicago, Illinois 60661
https:jib.illinois.gov/
Sincerely,
Katherine Nolan
Director
Legal Research Division
On or about November 5, 2025, during the Hearing in my domestic relations case.
The Honorable Judge Rosa Silva admitted reading all of Respondents Motions accompanied with Affidavits and a Summary Judgment never challenged by Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Plaintiff Francoise Hightower, Judge Iris Y. Chavira, Former States Attorney Kim Foxx or Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, she closed her eyes to the fact that Respondent was the victim to Judicial Malfeasance and Illegal Court Assembly used her unlawful judicial authority to continue a void case that no Cook County Judge has jurisdiction on because the States Attorney never had jurisdiction or any reasons to appear before any court because the case was DISMISSED September 17, 1987 by former States Attorney Richard J. Daley and the case was refiled without Defendant’s knowledge and a law firm was created pretending to represent the Defendant which was never true (Manigold) and a DEFAULT was entered May 18, 1988 never ordering child support payments and was never VACATED.
Judge Ronald Bartkowicz another judge used his unlawful authority by issuing a BOGUS WARRANT against the Defendant for an ORDER OF PROTECTION working with the States Attorneys and CTA Attorneys in the Workman’s Compensation Division his prior employment with the CTA, — entered a court order and instructed me not to continue to be reinstated to the CTA because they said he was not an employee..
The fact Judge Silva acknowledged reading Defendant’s Pleadings along with the States Attorney and heard the testimony of records deleted from the database acknowledging other criminal violations where every document DESTROYED, that corroborated State action was the result of certain Assistant States Attorneys were acting unlawfully in an attempt using their positions trying to EXTORT monies from the Defendant but he was on Public Aid.
That Judge Silva demonstrated as long as her actions were predicated against a Man of Color, she had nothing to fear as far as the law was concerned, her actions were going to be excused and commended because of the EGREGIOUS hate many of the participants who are caught up have for men or women in this matter. Judge Myron Mackoff committed the same crime on Judge Elizabeth Rivera’s case in 2019 J.I.B, Executive Dir. Michael Deno received Notice and knowledge of the foregoing from a Complaint filed and closed the case anyway due to alleged conflict of interests regarding certain judges and Assistant States Attorney Supervisor Kent Stephen Ray & Corporation Chief Deputy Counsel for the City of Chicago Michael Forti as judge.
Legal and Ethical Violations Suspected
The actions described above may constitute the following violations:
Official Misconduct – 720 ILCS 5/33-3 (performing an act in excess of lawful authority)
Tampering with Public Records – 720 ILCS 5/32-8 (falsifying an official court document)
Obstruction of Justice – 720 ILCS 5/31-4 (interfering with judicial proceedings)
Under Federal Law
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law – 18 U.S.C. § 242
Conspiracy Against Rights – 18 U.S.C. § 241
These acts reflect a deliberate misuse of judicial authority and constitute both ethical misconduct under the Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct (Rules 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 2.4)** and potential criminal violations under state and federal law.
Requested Action
I respectfully request that:
The Mayor & Board of Directors investigate this matter for potential federal civil rights and forgery violations; and
That an Independent Representative not affiliated with the CTA/ open a formal misconduct criminal investigation into Kent S. Ray, ATU 241 Union Officers, Ronald Bartkowicz for falsifying court orders, obstructing justice, Illegal Court Assembly, Cover-up Conspiracies, Egregious Civil Rights Crimes for trying to destroy employment records protecting all parties involved.
Dec. 1, 1994 Grievance was submitted and due to Kent S, Ray alleged intimate physical relationship with Secretary Michael Simmons of ATU 241, they conspired together to make sure, I was never properly reinstated, See how Assistant General Counsel as the Administrative Law Judge against the Respondent Anna Hamburg-Gal (Feb 3, 2016) Case No. L-CB-13-006, had before her evidence and testimony that CTA have failed to adhere to Page 2 of the Grievance Procedure but because ATU is comprised mostly of Black Americans or Colored People a Disparate Application was considered.
“L-CA-01-017-c” Local 8A-28A Metal Polishers, Sign & Display et al. v. CTA that they engaged in unfair labor practices where Ken S. Ray was the Gen Counsel, the union prevailed on behalf of the Charging Party, but ATU 241 never acted in the best interests of alleged membership.
Declaration
I declare under penalty of perjury that the statements in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
·In legal filings (e.g. in Quiroz v. CTA), he is signed as “Kent S. Ray, General Counsel, Chicago Transit Authority.” Illinois Courts Audio
·In a CTA board meeting transcript from 2023, he introduces himself simply as “Kent Ray, CTA’s general counsel.” CTA
·He continues to show up in more recent board meeting transcripts (e.g., July 2025) in that role. CTA
··Current role: General Counsel, Chicago Transit Authority (appointed May 11, 2022). He appears regularly in CTA board minutes and meeting transcripts as “Kent S. Ray, General Counsel.” CTA+1
··Earlier CTA work: He previously worked in the CTA Law Department (1990–2010) and was acting/general counsel before leaving in 2010. CTA
··Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office: After leaving CTA in 2010 he served in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office for many years (listed as Assistant State’s Attorney on numerous court filings and opinions). He supervised units such as Conflicts Counsel and Municipal Litigation and served as Chief of General Litigation & Advice. Nxstrib+1
··Legal filings & cases: His name appears as counsel for the CTA and Cook County in many court documents and appellate opinions (examples: Sauer v. CTA, and multiple Cook County/Illinois appellate filings). Justia Law+1
·
·Prior Career — Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office
·According to his bio, he has many years of experience with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office. lawyer.com+2Martindale.com+2
·Multiple sources note that he was “chief of the general litigation and advice division” in the Cook County prosecutor’s office. Yahoo Finance
·At one point, CTA’s board appointed someone to replace Kent Ray in the role of GC because “Kent Ray … [was] joining the state's attorney’s office.” Progressive Railroading
·In a Cook County SAO filing (Cambridge Analytica complaint), a “Kent S. Ray” is listed as an Assistant State’s Attorney. Cook County State's Attorney
·Background / Legal Profile
·Martindale (a legal directory) has a profile for Kent Stephen Ray as an attorney in Chicago. Martindale.com
·According to public records, he was born February 14, 1959, and resides in Chicago. nationalpublicdata
·On the Illinois Labor Relations Board (“L-CA-01-017-c” decision), he is referred to as “Deputy General Counsel, Kent Ray” (Feb 11, 2005 letter) in relation to CTA matters. Illinois Labor Relations Board
Kent Stephen Ray has (or had) a major elected political role (e.g., he was not a State’s Attorney in the sense of being the top elected prosecutor). His role in the State’s Attorney’s Office appears to have been as a career / appointed prosecutor, not the elected State’s Attorney.
Notable biographical detail (from CTA / bond filings)
CTA materials list his education and career path: BA, JD (Northwestern), earlier private practice, long service at CTA, then Cook County SAO (supervisory roles), Associate General Counsel for Cook County Health/Hospitals, and return to CTA as General Counsel. That bio is in CTA bond/finance documents.
Kent S. Ray is a long-time Chicago-area government attorney who moved between CTA and the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office and returned to the CTA as General Counsel. Public records and reporting identify him as a career legal professional and government lawyer
Thursday, November 13, 2025
COOK COUNTY IS NOT A PLACE WHERE THE INNOCENT/SENIOR CITIZENS OR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS OF COLOR RECEIVES JUSTICE.
LOOK AT HOW DEMOCRATS EMBRACE JIM CROW LAWS OUTLAWED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ENGAGE IN EXTORTION IN THE GUISE OF CHILD SUPPORT, STEAL HOMES IN THE GUISE OF ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES AND NOW REMOVING CHILDREN FROM MOTHERS IN THE GUISE OF THEM BEING UNFIT ETC TO KEEP CERTAIN MEMBERS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT/FRAATERNITIES FROM PAYING CHILD SUPPORT.
THEIR APPEARS TO BE A RACIAL WAR IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY JUDICIARY, THAT THE MEDIA ISN'T MENTIONING BECAUSE IT WILL CREATE A MASS EXODUS OF BLACKS LEAVING THE PARTY.
WHEN CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY CALVIN EVANS, GOV JB PRITZKER, FORMER STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX, ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL, JUDGE IRIS Y. CHAVIRA AND FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER WHO HAD BEEN REPRESENTED BY THE STATES ATTORNEY AS A POLICE OFFICER FAILED TO RESPOND TO A SUMMARY JUDGMENT SERVED UPON THEM ADMITTED TO ALL OF THE PLEADINGS OF THE INJUSTICES NAMED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT.
A DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR $50 MILLION DOLLARS WAS FILED IN FEB 2024 SEEKING DAMAGES FOR DESTROYING THE DEFENDANT WHERE ALLEGED KU KLUX KLAN JUDGES AND ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS HAD HIM REMANDED 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT ON A CASE FORMER STATES ATTORNEY RICHARD J. DALEY DISMISSED AGAINST HIM SEPT 17, 1987, ( 85 D 068184) THE ONLY IRISHMAN WHO RULED CORRECTLY BECAUSE THE PATERNITY TESTS EXCLUDED THE DEFENDANT FROM BEING THE FATHER FROM THE COOK COUNTY AND AMERICAN RED CROSS MEDICAL FACILITIES.
FRANCOISE HAD A ATTORNEY (JOSEPH V. RODDY, A FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY) TO REFILE THE CASE (88 D 079012) AND NEVER NOTIFIED HIM OF THE MATTER BEING BACK IN COURT, SO THEY MADE UP A LAW FIRM MANILOW & GOLDMAN AS BEING MY ATTORNEYS AND GOT A DEFAULT MAY 18, 1988 FROM JUDGE D ADOLPHUS RIVERS BUT THE JUDGE NEVER ORDERED ANY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS AND THE COURT ORDER WAS NEVER VACATED.
MEMBERS OF THE ALLEGED KLAN HAD THEIR MEMBERS TO DELETE ALL RECORDS OF VERACITY THAT CORROBORATED THE TRUTH OF EVERYTHING BEING ASSERTED.
RIGHT NOW THE VERY RACIST AND ALLEGED KLAN MEMBERS CONTROLLING THE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY HAS RECRUITED A NUMBER OF JUDGES, ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS OR STATE EMPLOYEES TO FIGHT AGAINST THE VERY INDIVIDUALS WHO DID NOT GO ALONG WITH STATUS QUO OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE------SO JUDGES MICHAEL FORTI, PATRICK POWERS, MARITZA MARTINEZ, ROSA SILVA, ABBEY ROMANEK ARE USING THEIR ETHNIC MAKE UP RACIALLY TO FIGHT AGAINST ANYBODY STANDING UP TO THE KU KLUX KLAN OR CORRUPTION WITHIN THE JUDICIARY.
THERE ARE A NUMBER OF SELLOUT BLACKS BUT FOR THE RECORD THE ABOVE-NAMED DEMOCRATS STOPPED THE KU KLUX KLAN OR ANY WHITE NATIONALISTS DICTATING THE JUDICIARY.
JUST YESTERDAY THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE COOK COUNTY DIRECTED COMPLAINTS TO THE CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY EVANS,
I am writing in response to your correspondence to the Cook County Inspector General, which was referred to me for a response. The administrative authority of the chief judge does not include the authority to review decisions made by other judges, direct other judges in their rulings, or intervene in cases assigned to other judges.
If you feel the judge has engaged in misconduct or has demonstrated an incapacity to perform his duties, you may wish to contact the Judicial Inquiry Board at:
Judicial Inquiry Board
555 W. Monroe St, Suite 800-N
Chicago, Illinois 60661
https:jib.illinois.gov/
Sincerely,
Katherine Nolan
Director
Legal Research Division
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE ROSA MARIE SILVA AND PATRICK POWERS ET AL.2
Hereto attached is the Motion well particularized articulating Judge Rosa going along with ILLEGAL COURT ASSEMBLIES as Judge Powers navigated Silva into committing egregious crimes against the Respondent violating his Civil Rights and every other Black and Colored litigant trying to seek justice in a County that don't respect or like Black or Colored people.
Perhaps now that every judge see that not one Democratic judge ever had jurisdiction on this case or Shemica Taylor's case removing her daughter from her custody and evicting the Johnson Sisters from their home when the foreclosure was vacated 14 or 15 years ago being innocent or having an attorney means nothing to Ku Klux Klan members controlling the judiciary.
RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE ROSA MARIE SILVA & PATRICK POWERS INSTANTER FOR “CAUSE” PERJURY DUE TO ILLEGAL COURT HEARINGS STATES ATTORNEYS COLLUDED WITH CERTAIN COOK COUNTYJUDGES AND UNLAWFULLY HAD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE COURT KNOWING THE STATES ATTORNEY NEVER NOTIFIED HIM THE MATTER WAS REFILED DUE TO IRISH AND POLISH ETHNIC JUDGES ALLOWED THEIR FORMER COLLEAGUE JOSEPH V RODDY (DECEASED) AND OTHER RACIST MEMBERS OF THE STATES ATTORNEY S OFFICE TO AID AND ASSIST IN USING THAT STATE AGENCY TO HELP EXTORT MONEY AS JUDGE PATRICK POWERS FORUM SHOPPED JUDGES PATRICIA FALLON, JAMES SHAPIRO WHO RECUSED THEMSELVES BUT HE ENGINEERED THE UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS ON BEHALF OF ROSA MARIE SILVA AS SHE WENT ALONG WITH EVERY CRIMINAL ACT AND BECAME A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” et al.
Respectfully submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Smile for the cameras because the FBI is paying attention and has been on board for quite a while.
The U.S.
Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94
S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a
state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes
into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in
that case stripped of his official or representative character and is
subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual
conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from
responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis
supplied in original].
By law, a
judge is a state officer as in this case Federal officers.
The judge
then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE ROSA MARIE SILVA
& PATRICK POWERS INSTANTER FOR “CAUSE” PERJURY DUE TO ILLEGAL COURT
HEARINGS STATES ATTORNEYS COLLUDED WITH CERTAIN COOK COUNTYJUDGES AND
UNLAWFULLY HAD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE COURT KNOWING THE STATES ATTORNEY NEVER
NOTIFIED HIM THE MATTER WAS REFILED DUE TO IRISH AND POLISH ETHNIC JUDGES ALLOWED
THEIR FORMER COLLEAGUE JOSEPH V RODDY (DECEASED) AND OTHER RACIST MEMBERS OF
THE STATES ATTORNEY S OFFICE TO AID AND ASSIST IN USING THAT STATE AGENCY TO
HELP EXTORT MONEY AS JUDGE PATRICK POWERS FORUM SHOPPED JUDGES PATRICIA FALLON,
JAMES SHAPIRO WHO RECUSED THEMSELVES BUT HE ENGINEERED THE UNLAWFUL COURT
ORDERS ON BEHALF OF ROSA MARIE SILVA AS SHE WENT ALONG WITH EVERY CRIMINAL ACT
AND BECAME A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” & MAKING HER/HIS
COURT ORDERS A NULLITY CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN THIS DIABOLICAL EXTORTION
OPERATION IN THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF COOK COUNTY MAKING ALL ORDERS A NULLITY
VOID IN ITS ENTIRETY BECAUSE NO JUDGE HAD LEGAL AUTHORITY ON THE RESPONDENT ASA
NORA RAMIREZ MATRANGA DID NOT PREPARE THE COURT ORDER AS ILL DEPT OF HEALTHCARE
AND FAMILY SERVICES REPRESENTING RESPONDENT AS ASA RHONDA HAWKINS-LYKE DID AS
JUDGES SILVA AND POWERS SIGNED ACTING AS DE FACTO ATTORNEYS FOR FRANCOISE
HIGHTOWER AS JUDGES ARE DEMONSTRATING A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING RACIAL
INJUSTICE/JIM CROW LAWS ARE ACTIVE IN COOK COUNTY COURTS DUE TO HATE BIAS
PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001
(a) (2,3) THIS IS HOW THEY COVER-UP THE FACT STATES ATTORNEY IS AND HAS BEEN
REPRESENTING A POLICE OFFICER ILLEGALLY ON A CASE RICHARD J. DALEY DISMISSED
SEPT 17, 1987 (85 D 068184), AND DEFAULTED ON MAY 18, 1988 NEVER ORDERED THE
PAYMENT OF ANY CHILD SUPPORT BECAUSE DEFENDANT WAS NEVER SERVED AND DEFAULT WAS
NEVER VACATED AND WITH TOTAL CORROBORATION OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGES IN COOK COUNTY
NOT FOLLOWING ANY RULES OF ILLINOIS CIVIL PROCEDURES OR ANY LAWS IN ACCORDANCE
TO ILLINOIS STATUTES BUT AS“PRIVATE
CITIZENS”, THEY ARE ENGAGING IN A PRIMAE FACIE SHOWING IN AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACYCIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING
UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES BY MAKING EGREGIOUS PERJURED BEFORE
KANGAROO TRIBUNALS IMPERSONATING LAWFUL COURTSMAKING EVERY COURT ORDERVOID/NULLITY CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY CALVIN
EVANS, FORMER STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX, ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL,
GOV JB PRITZKER, COOK COUNTY SHERIFF TOM DART, JUDGE IRIS Y. CHIVIRA AND
FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER RECEIVED SUMMARY JUDGMENT DEC 4, 2023 AND NEVER DENIED TO
ANY OF THE PLEADINGS BECAUSE OF THE VERACITY RECORDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS/FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES ACTING AS
“PRIVATE CITIZENS” COMPLICIT IN THIS CHILD SUPPORT SCAM OF ILLINOIS CRIMINAL
ENTERPRISE FRAUDULENTLY FALSIFYING COURT DOCUMENTS CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE
REMANDED INTO CUSTODY 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT AND THE CTA NOT
REINSTATING HIM BACK TO WORK BECAUSE THEY DESTROYED HIS EMPLOYMENT RECORDS
TRYING TO COVER-UP JUDGES ALLOWING EXTORTION OF HIS WAGES TO POLICE OFFICER
& JUDGE MANUFACTURING AN UNLAWFUL WARRANT IN THIS CONSPIRACY AND IS SEEKING
$50 MILLION DOLLARS w/AFFIDAVIT(filed Dec. 4, 2023) MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS (735 ILCS 5/2-1005) & FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CORROBORRATING THE VERACITY COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT
HONOR DUE PROCESS OR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUAL PROTECTION TO IT’S CITIZENS PRO SE OR
WITH ATTORNEYS IN ANY OF THE COURT’S w/AFFIDAVIT AND SERVED ON THE ENTIRE COOK
COUNTY JUDICIARY AND NEVER DENIED THE LEGAL INSTRUMENT (FILED JULY 14, 2025)
Now comes Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence,
Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons
and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion to Disqualify
judge Rosa Marie Silva and Patrick Powers Instanter et al;
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Courtof Cook County
is a criminal enterprise. U.S.
v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v.
Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001)“Pro Se litigants are
presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”
1.)Respondent filed a
Summary Judgments and was served on the States Attorney and Francoise where the
States Attorney admitted to every pleading demonstrating their corroboration
along with several other Assistant States Attorneys were used in an elaborate
extortion scheme trying to EXTORT money from the Respondent, in the guise as
child support, which was not his child and he never owed Petitioner a dime and
notified every judge he appeared before but Judge Shapiro said “Respondent was
at a significant disadvantage” Cook County Courts do not recognize Black,
Colored Freemen or women or Senior Citizens Equal Protection of the Laws due to
it still being Sundown Courts as is so many cities in Illinois and still
Chicago.
A-This case is originally over Sept. 17, 1987 by former
States Attorney Richard J. Daley, the only Irish person who followed the laws
and respected the Respondent and his Attorney Robert A. Egan but the case was
illegally bought back to court as an attorney (Manigold & Goldman) was made
up saying said law firm was representing the Respondent which was a big lie, case
was Defaulted May 18, 1988 and never vacated, but this has been admitted to via
Summary Judgment and repeated to Judge Shapiro, and Silva but is being ignored
as so many are trying to continuously cover this matter up.
B-That ASA Nora Matranga testified in open court a judge
issued Sanctions in 2005, hereto attached Ex A- Printout from the
database 7 pages dated 01/24/2005 – 11/10/2005 unequivocally demonstrate
Respondent was before the court illegally and the States Attorney was
representing Police Officer Francoise Hightower while Respondent was on PUBLIC
AID and was REMANDED into CUSTODY ON ARREARAGE when their was never a Court
Order ORDERING HIM TO PAY ANY CHILD SUPPORT.
C-The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that
"No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the
Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper
v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any
judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United
States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the
Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
2.)That Rule 56.1 requires a
party opposing summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's
statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response
to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the
case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of
the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is
very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of
the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement
of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
In the matter of Raymond, 442 F.
3d at 606. (7th
Cir. 2013) )The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to
Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should
be decided on their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a
summary judgment motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.
3.)That Judge Patrick Powers as an Irishman has
ignored all laws and recruited Judge Silva to stand with all racist judges or
people of Color they hate by ruling in accordance to how she is instructed and
she has complied, hereto attached Nov. 5, 2025 Court Order signed where she
never had legal authority over the Respondent making that document likened to a
three-day old tampon/pad.
4.)Judge Silva was more
concerned with how the events were transcribed in the September 9, Hearing than
the Oct. 15, 2025 Affidavit corroborating how she received Notice and Knowledge
of ASA Hawkins presented her a false court order where Judge Powers signed it
against her overt testimony articulated in court.
A-Judge Powers assumed
the authority of the Presiding judge Regina Scannicchio and forum-shopped
judges he thought would embrace racial hatred and his bias disposition against
the Respondent, Rule 23.6 Substitution of Judge of the Illinois Rules of Civil
Procedure (C) Orders granting a substitution of judge shall be accompanied by
an order transferring the case to the presiding judge of the division or
district in which the case is then pending for reassignment.
B-That Presiding Judge Regina Scannichhio never transferred this
matter to judge Silva she became a willing participant in this criminal
extortion conspiracy.
To show fraud upon the
court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct
affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself
was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court.
Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
A
void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940)
308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
1.)The
Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such
jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his
process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson,
57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is
applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is
"without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.
They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought,
even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no
justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or
sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held
that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper
presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority,
- it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v.
Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no
legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them.
They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they
enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they
become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
5.)That
under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have
the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to
follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
6.)In 2006 Gerald P. Nordgreen was appointed to represent
me when, I appeared before judge Timothy P. Murphy when Tycee was 22 years old
as Police Officer Francoise was being represented by the Assistant States
Attorneys and I was on Public Aid, Murphy said to me in court “today is your
lucky day, I can’t lock you up anymore” Atty Nordgreen looked at me and
motioned me not to say anythingIt was
during this period the Assistant States Attorneys where Judge Chivira was an
Assistant States Attorney, they backdated Tycee’s age to reflect she was born
in 1995 making her 11 years old.
7.)CODE OF
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
The Illinois Supreme Court
issued the Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct as Supreme Court Rules
("SCR"). The Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct is incorporated herein
as a part of this Complaint. Supreme Court Rules are law, and must be followed by
litigants, attorneys, and all Circuit and Appellate Court judges. Compliance
with SCR is not discretionary, but is mandatory. Any noncompliance is unlawful,
and judges have no lawful authority to act unlawfully.
The Illinois Code of Judicial
Conduct Rule 62(A) states: A judge should respect and comply with the law and
should conduct himself or herself at all times in a manner that promotes public
confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
The Illinois Code of Judicial
Conduct Rule 63(A) states:
(A) Adjudicative
Responsibilities
(1) A judge should be
faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it.
8.) INHERENT POWER OF THE COURT
Judge Silva, and Powers, knew,
or should have known, that every court of lawful jurisdiction has the inherent
power to determine subject-matter jurisdiction. Inherent power of a court is
not dependent on whether a court has jurisdiction, otherwise it could never
have the lawful authority to determine if it had jurisdiction in any matter
before it. This inherent power to determine jurisdiction applies not only to
determine its own jurisdiction, but the jurisdiction of any other court. People
v. Childs, 278 Ill.App.3d 65, 663 N.E.2d 161 (4th Dist. 1996) ("The duty
to vacate a void judgment is based on the inherent power of a court to expunge
from its records void acts of which it has knowledge."); Evans v.
Corporate Services, 207 Ill.App.3d 297, 565 N.E.2d 724 (2nd Dist. 1990)
("A court has inherent authority to expunge void acts from its
records.").
Judge Silva, Powers and Forti
new, or should have known, that under the Supreme Law of the Land:
"Courts are the mere
instruments of the law, and can will nothing. When they are said to exercise a
discretion, it is a mere legal discretion, a discretion to be exercised in
discerning the course prescribed by law, and, when that is discerned, it is the
duty of the court to follow it. Judicial power is never exercised for the
purpose of giving effect to the will of the judge; always for the purpose of
giving effect to the will of the legislature; or, in other words, to the will
of the law." [Emphasis in original]. Littleton v. Berbling, 468 F.2d 389,
412 (7th Cir. 1972), citing Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 9 Wheat (22
U.S.) 738, 866, 6 L. Ed 204 (1824); U.S. v. Simpson, 927 F.2d 1088, 1090 (9th
Cir. 1991).
Judge Silva, Powers and Forti
knew, or should have known, that the void judgment brought before him, remains
void even if he did not vacate it. Judge Silva and Powers knew, or should have
known, that the void judgment was not affirmed nor validated by his failure to
properly exercise his judicial duty.
Judge Silva and Powers knew,
or should have known, that they had the duty, and had no discretion, to vacate
void orders and judgments. Judge Silva and Powers knew, or should have known,
that they had conscientiously, arbitrarily, capriciously, deliberately,
intentionally, and knowingly engaged in conduct in violation of his duty as a
judge, and engaged in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.
9.)TREASON
Judge Silva and Powers knew,
or should have known that, by the Summary Judgments, Affidavits prior
allegations that they had no jurisdiction, committed treason against the
Constitution. "We [Judges] have no more right to decline the exercise of
jurisdiction which is given, then to usurp that which is not given. The one or
the other would be treason to the Constitution." [clarification added] U.S.
v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens
v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).
Judge Silva, Powers and Forti
should not have engaged in treason to the Constitution, a Constitution to which
he has taken a personal oath to support. VIOLATION OF SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND
All judges have taken an oath
to, and their lawful authority depends on their complete and full compliance
with, the Constitution of the United States of America, and the Supreme Law of
the Land.
The Supreme of the Land can
be found in the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. In Old Wayne Mut. L.
Assoc. v. McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 S. Ct. 236 (1907), the Supreme Court ruled
that:
"Chief Justice Marshall
had long before observed in Ross v. Himely, 4 Cranch 241, 269, 2 L.ed. 608,
617,that, upon principle, the operation of every judgment must depend on the
power of the court to render that judgment. In Williamson v. Berry, 8 How. 495,
540, 12 L. ed. 1170, 1189, it was said to be well settled that the jurisdiction
of ANY COURT exercising authority over a subject `may be inquired into in EVERY
OTHER COURT when the proceedings in the former are relied upon and brought
before the latter by a party claiming the benefit of such proceedings,' and the
rule prevails whether `the decree or judgment has been given, in a court of
admiralty, chancery, ecclesiastical court, or court of common law, or whether
the point ruled has arisen under the laws of nations, the practice in chancery,
or the municipal laws of states.'" [Emphasis added].
In Elliott v. Peirsol, 1 Pet.
328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828), the court stated that "without
authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not
voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to
a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all
persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in
law, as trespassers. This distinction runs through all the cases on the
subject; and it proves, that the jurisdiction of ANY COURT exercising authority
over a subject, may be inquired into IN EVERY COURT, when the proceedings of
the former are relied on and brought before the latter, by the party claiming
the benefit of such proceedings." [Emphasis added].
Judge Silva, Powers Forti
knew, or should have known, the law and the U.S. Supreme Court decisions that
ANY COURT and EVERY COURT can vacate a void order. Judge Silva, Powers and
Forti conscientiously, arbitrarily, capriciously, deliberately, intentionally,
and knowingly engaged in conduct in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land,
and of Rule 62(A) and Rule 63(A).
10.)VIOLATION OF
THE LAW OF ILLINOIS
11.)Judge Silva, Powers and Forti knew, or should have known, the
Illinois Supreme Court decisions that ANY COURT can vacate a void order.
12.)In City of Chicago v. Fair Employment Practices Com., 65 Ill.2d
108, 357 N.E.2d 1154 (1976), the court stated that "A judgment, order or
decree entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction of the parties or the
subject matter, or which lacks the inherent power to make or enter the
particular order involved, is void, and may be attacked at any time or in ANY
COURT, either directly or collaterally." [Emphasis added].
13.)In R.W. Sawant & Co. v. Allied Programs Corp., 111 Ill.2d
304, 309, 489 N.E.2d 1360 (1986), the court stated that "[a] judgment,
order or decree entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction of the parties or
the subject matter, or which lacks the inherent power to make or enter the
particular order involved, is void, and may be attacked at any time or IN ANY
COURT, either directly or collaterally." [Emphasis added].
14.)In Evans v. Corporate Services, 207 Ill.App.3d 297, 565 N.E.2d
724 (2nd Dist. 1990) the court stated that "a void judgment, order or
decree may be attacked at any time or in ANY COURT, either directly or
collaterally" [Emphasis added].
15.)Judge Silva, Powers and Forti knew, or should have known, that
the phrases "ANY COURT", "IN ANY COURT", "IN EVERY
COURT" and "EVERY OTHER COURT" found in Court decisions means
any court in Cook County, any court in the State of Illinois, or in any court,
state or federal, in the United States, as a void order has no legal force or
effect, and is not, and could not be, at any time a final judgment.
16.)In People v. Streeper, 12 Ill.2d 204, 145 N.E.2d 625 (1957), the
Court stated that "The jurisdiction of the court must be determined as of
the commencement of the action. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed.
565".
17.)Judge Silva, Powers and Forti knew, or should have known, that
he had to determine the question of subject-matter jurisdiction at the
commencement of the 90-D-2724 action in 1970 and the 91-D-5122 action in 1971.
Judge Silva, Powers and Forti did not comply with the law, and did not
determine whether jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Cook County existed at
either pertinent times.
18.)Judge Silva, Powers and Forti conscientiously, arbitrarily,
capriciously, deliberately, intentionally, and knowingly engaged in conduct in
violation of Rule 62(A) and Rule 63(A). FRAUD UPON THE COURT
19.)"Fraud upon the court" occurs whenever any officer of
the court commits fraud before a tribunal. A judge is not a court; he is under
law an officer of the court, and he must not engage in any action to deceive
the court. Trans Aero Inc. v. LaFuerga Area Boliviana, 24 F.3d 457 (2nd Cir.
1994); Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985) (fraud
upon the court exists "where the judge has not performed his judicial
duties").
20.)The Supreme Court, In re Eugene Lee Armentrout et al., 99 Ill.2d
242, 75 Ill. Dec. 703, 457 N.E.2d 1262 (1983), stated that:
21.)"Fraud encompasses a broad range of human behavior,
including " ' * * * anything calculated to deceive, * * * whether it be by
direct falsehood or by innuendo, by speech or by silence, by word of mouth or
by look or gesture.' " (Regenold v. Baby Fold, Inc. (1977), 68 Ill.2d 419,
435, 12 Ill. Dec. 151, 369 N.E.2d 858, citing People ex rel. Chicago Bar
Association v. Gilmore (1931), 345 Ill. 28, 46, 177 N.E. 710; In re Alschuler
(1944), 388 Ill. 492, 503-04; Black's Law Dictionary 594 (5th
ed. 1979).) Too, this court has previously disciplined lawyers even though
their fraudulent misconduct did not harm [99 Ill.2d 252] any particular
individual. In re Lamberis (1982), 93 Ill.2d 222, 229, 66 Ill. Dec. 623, 443
N.E.2d 549."
22.)Judges should not engage in fraud upon the
court, issuing decisions that he knew, or should have known, under law were
void and in violation of the Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct.
23.)JUDGE Silva,
Powers and Forti CANNOT CONFER JURISDICTION ON A COURT THAT LACKS JURISDICTION
24.)Judge Silva, Powers and Forti had no lawful authority to confer
jurisdiction on any court that does not have subject-matter jurisdiction, yet
Judge Silva has attempted to confer jurisdiction on the Paternity matter 88 D
079012 upon which no subject-matter jurisdiction was ever conferred by law.
Martin v. Schillo, 389 Ill. 607, 60 N.E.2d 392 (1945) ("Jurisdiction of
the subject matter is always conferred by law."). May 18, 1988 Court Order
never was vacated and in no way was there a child support order ever entered.
25.)That unbeknown to said “Private Citizens” impersonating
Cook County judges, the State of Illinois Division of Child Support sent the
Respondent a Letter June 13, 2024 (HFS) for the first time in over 30 years, ASA Harris acknowledged having a Court Order from a
Judge in 2007 where Tycee Hightower was emancipated in 2002, before judge
Chaviraand the Respondent replied expeditiously July 1, 2024 via email to every
Democratic Person in the legal profession,
A-That a Child Support representative called the Respondent August
31st 2023 of 312 793-2526 23 minutes 40 seconds, stating she
received a referral from Springfield to ZERO out child support et al. hereto
attached as Respondent asked her a question in Spanish, she did not answer
because it was learned that she was of Polish ethnicity.
B-That the letter on its
face corroborates how racism and corruption played a major role against the
Respondent when Chavira was allegedly the Assistant States Attorney during the
years 2002-2007, the Illinois Dept of Public Aid Div of Child Support had the
Respondent in court illegally him and his family were on Public Aid as well and
he was taking his family to therapy at UIC 3-4 days out of the week and Public
Aid had to provide him additional monies so that he could get his family to
their appointments for the help that was needed coping with depression etc.
C-That the Political
Machine rewarded every Black or Colored person who participated in the creation
or falsification of any documents or kept their mouths shut or snitched on
those trying to help him against the Respondent for the alleged Ku Klux Klan
judges and attorneys Lester Barclay is the President of the CTA, William
Stewart Boyd became a judge and a monster!, Iris Chavira allegedly received a
judicial position not qualified one bit, etc. but as long as Black and certain
Hispanics destroy their own ethnic groups, they will be rewarded a position in
the Democratic Party.
26.)That because of the Color of Respondent’s skin said
communication fell on DEAF EARS, nevertheless, Respondent due-diligently
particularized the fraudulent events and made sure the applicable parties were
highlighted so that members of law enforcement would not have any problems
ascertaining the Colored or Racist Klan involved, Email sent to Gov Pritzker
& Elizabeth M. Whitehorn, Director and Iris Martinez Clerk of the Circuit
Court of Cook County showing how a racist judge of Polish ethnicity admitted
issuing a Bogus warrant against the Respondent for her Irish Attorney Joseph V.
Roddy where the judge threatened him if he continued to be reinstated to the
CTA, he was going to lock him up again!
Judges
acted as Ku Klux Klansmen for Petitioner as a Police Officer what did she have
to do for them returning the favor with her Police badge?
27.)That Respondent being aware of Blacks in the Democratic
Party-Political Machine are nothing more than Puppets or Figure heads upholding
racism and Jim Crow Laws in Cook County or the City of Chicago will never and
have never attempted to speak up or try and do what was right by him in
standing up to the Caucasians who were the initial authors of these Ku Klux
Klan Criminal Civil Rights Violations.
28.)
29.)The Democratic Party
immediately removed Judge Bonaguru and replaced him with a Certified Bitch
Leida J. Santiago, I appeared in court, she said, “where the fuck is he”?
The Clerk said, “who your Honor”? “This Respondent, I hear causing
shit around here”, Clerk’s reply, “you mean Mr. Lawrence”? My reply,
“Present”, the judge said, “I will lock your Ass up you don’t know
who the fuck, I am”, I was shocked, and NERVOUS as Hell, “she dared me to
open my mouth to say anything”, all of a sudden, it felt like, I had to have a
bowel movement on myself but couldn’t nothing came out, I collapsed everything
turned black, I couldn’t see anything but my hearing was phenomena, I heard
Cheryl Cook of the CTA a Black woman who helped falsify a lot of papers for Ken
S. Ray, telling the judge, “he is having an Anxiety Attack”, Judge
Santiago said “the Mother Fucker better be having something”, “he must knew,
I was getting ready to send his Mother Fucking Ass to jail”, (this was as a
result to alleged Ku Klux Klan High Ranking member Judge Ronald Bartkowicz
issued a bogus warrant against me saying I beat up Francoise and he signed a
court order for an Order of Protection which was a Big Ass Lie) the people
around me, I learned as my eyes were opening were deputies, they were giving me
something to smell and some water to drink and they helped me to my feet, to a
chair, the judge said, “let the mother fucking Paramedics come up here,
the deputies shouted no judge we don’t need the ambulance, the Deputies
insisted, I not let no paramedics touch me or go into no ambulance, they said
we got you”
30.)
31.)I never saw that judge
anymore and have no idea what took place after my first and only experience but
afterwards, I was not able to hold any food if I had court, going before Judge
Haracz and Timothy Murphy for example, if I had court on Monday and it was a
Friday, I could not eat anything Saturday or Sunday because on Monday, I had to
leave court and go to the bathroom and have diarrhea and could not get up from
the toilet until my colon was empty and always feel faint and dizzy going back
to court.
32.)
33.)I had Judge Charles Winkler
to preside over the matter when Tycee was an Emancipated Adult to order ASA
Lisa Costello to respond to my Motion, she looked at the judge shockingly
replied really judge? He said oh yes, this is a legal instrument he has filed
and you are going to reply, Judge Winkler nor ASA Lisa Costello ever returned
back to the court
34.)
35.)I was threatened by ASA
Brian Volkman in front of Judge Haracz where he told me that he ought to go get
one of his Klan judges that, I have been complaining about, he said you don’t
know who I am and what, we are capable of, I snapped and before, I was able to
knock his Ass out as he was about to step in my face a Black female Deputy came
out of nowhere jumped in front of me and faced Volkman, he seemed afraid of her
backed up and Judge Haracz turned his head trying to pretend not to see
anything, she said that this had to be reported.
36.)That Various State Agencies violated
Respondent’s Civil Rights < Labor Board, States Attorney etc. Pembaur v.
City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case
that clarified a previous case, Monell v.
Department of Social Services (1978), and
established that municipalities can be held liable even for a single decision
that is improperly made, State Agency colluded with a plethora of other
agencies violating the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 and Civil rights Act of 1866
and Mansell v Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 2d.
A-Francoise Hightower
knowingly with malicious intentions Induced alleged members of the Ku Klux Klan
within the judiciary and other State Agencies to violate his Civil Rights
because he didn’t cower to her or their intimidation tactics, FBI said they
didn’t want 1 or 2 judges they want everyone involved and other members of law
enforcement encouraged him to just keep writing.
37.)That on the 14th
floor a Caucasian Seargent from the Cook County Sheriff’s department was posted
in the center of the four courtrooms 1402, 1401, 1403 and 1404, prior I heard
Francoise telling Brian “oh let me tell you, Joe ain’t no mother fuckin punk
you got a fight on your hands dealing with him”, his reply, “don’t worry we got
something for his Ass”, her reply, “ok we will see”, ASA Brian is deceased but
Tycee was EMANCIPATED as an Adult where now everyone in the Democratic
Judiciary knew the records were in fact BACKDATED to make the adult appear as a
minor and everyone has ADMITTED to this FACT, but because of my skin Color all
of them are covering it all up.
38.)President Biden stated in a Leaked Zoom Call:
via TikTok and X ll_Purpose_Hak (@HakHinton)
posted at 1:29 AM on Tue, Sep 17, 2024: Mass immigration is by design. Joe Biden and Democrats have let in over 10
million illegal immigrants. They will get political representation and
amnesty once Democrats get back control. By 2040 this country is Doomed
not just because of African Americans but it will be minority white European
and you guys are going to have to start working more with the Hispanics. https://t.co/DCIk7Jzepc (https://x.com/HakHinton/status/1835929025354580422?s=03)
The President of the United States has implied that it is better
to work with unqualified immigrants regardless to their backgrounds than to
deal with African Americans; unfortunately, if you look at Chicago alone with
the number of Negroes in authority how many of them have any power over corrupt
racist Caucasians?
A-That
Maritza Martinez finagled herself “FRAUDULENTLY” into this case by
assuming jurisdiction on a matter she never had any authority; she went beyond
her authority and became a “Private Citizen”.INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter,
1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal
Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist.
1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The
elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes
referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of
material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3)
intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in
reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party
resulting from such reliance.
A-. CONSPIRACY
Fraudmaybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41
ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense need
not have entered intoconspiracy at
same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied
upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed;
Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
40.)Anytime a racist Irish have the audacity to say to an
innocent man “today is your lucky day, I can’t LOCK YOU UP anymore” judge
Timothy P. Murphy or a Polaca David E. Haracz tells you, “I know that
you are not the BIOLOGICAL FATHER, I’m just the BILL COLLECTOR” or the
other Polaca Ronald Bartkowicz issues a BOGUS WARRANT as a former CTA attorney
trying to help keep his racist Brethren from being discovered at the CTA (admit
to everything as being accurate in the Motion to Disqualify him and compliments
the Motion and asks the Respondent “How did you know, that I use to work for
the CTA?”) who stole said wages while off work injured on duty and to
cover-up all of the illegal wage garnishees sent to her racist Irish attorney
representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer, there is
a huge problem in the judiciary, A HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN OR WOMAN cannot receive
Equal Justice or Equal Protection within the laws OF THIS CITY OR STATE, when
these racist hateful individuals have found a way to circumvent the United
States Constitution and still enforce Jim Crow laws which has been outlawed by
the U.S. Supreme Court as demonstrated though out this case. #JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2012/08/chronology-of-unlawful-contempt-charges.html? A Certified Affidavit Notarized
ignored by racist States Attorney Dick Devine.
Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not
contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of
contrary averments in theadverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group
Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483
N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al
A-Pursuant to 735
ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners
pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance
must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived
and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes
v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
41.)That because of the above; Fraud admissibility
great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud
51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,
great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence,
and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in
the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334.
Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2014/12/blacklivesdontmatter-judgemikva-never.html?spref=tw
A-That
said case had to recruit a judge from the juvenile division because no judge in
the Daley Center aka (Babylon, Hell, etc.) wanted to have any dealings with the
Respondent, Judge Mikva told the Respondent “he had a Gift, he can tell a
story using the laws and she understood everything he was saying, in that his
pleadings were unique not the way law school teaches students how to plead.”
B-That
the transcript attached to the database in Cook County is incredible reading
material, the FBI or State Police will love reading this document it
corroborates how a State Agency similar to how Edward Burke was convicted was
being used to try and suspend said driver’s license.
“In addition,
when judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a
void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become
trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.”
C-That said link particularizes some of the cases linked to the
Hightower v Lawrence “fraudulently”
https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-real-reason-why-chicago-is-so.html?spref=tw
Ethics
All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of ProfessionalConduct, and trail lawyers must be
particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.
RPC3.3, entitled “ConductBefore a Tribunal,” sets forth the
standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of
that rule states:
(a)In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1)make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
(2)fail to disclose to a
tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3)fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to
be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing
counsel;
(4)Offer evidence that the
lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes
to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
(5)participate in the creation
or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the
evidence is false ;
(6)counsel or assist the
client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;
(7)engage in other illegal
conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;
(8)fail to disclose the
identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the
lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;
(9)intentionally degrade a
witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning
that person which are not relevant to the case;
(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not
reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible
evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as
a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the
credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or
innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for
any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal
contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable
crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 1889 WL
2373 (1st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations to the
court. People v. Katelhut, 322 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E.2d
590 (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is
punishable as contempt. People ex rel.
Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill.
App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1st Dist. 1939).
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits
misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official
capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as
required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by
law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or
another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38
33-3.
The United States Supreme
Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it
stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and
convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of
judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley,
case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since
judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become
principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since
no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been
convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
42.)That Judge Maritza Martinez demonstrated Bias and
collusion by signing her name on court order that was clearly fraudulent (Feb
26 2024, March 27. 2024)
a.She
used her robe and unlawful authority in the same identical manner as the other Democratic
Judges not realizing she became a “Private Citizen” and no longer operating
under an obligation and oath she swore to because she was never recommended to
be a judge in the first place so she never really understood her function on
the bench but as long as she denied Respondents Motions accompanied with
Affidavits she showed her allegiance to whomever sponsored her on the Cook
County ballot proving Black and Brown lives don’t matter due to Terrorist Control
Racist Democrats have over the legal tribunals 735 ILCS 5/2—1001(a)(3) (West 2006). Although the statute does
not define “cause”, Illinois courts have held that in such circumstances,
actual prejudice has been required to FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case,
that is, either prejudicial trial conduct or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n
Transamerica Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d 247, 311 N.E. 2d 673 (1974; In re
Marriage of Kozloff, 101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79 Ill. Dec 165 463 N.E. 2d 719
(1984); see also People v. Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171, 181, 28 Ill. Dec. 508, 390
N.E. 2d 867 (1979).
43.)The
Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such
jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his
process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson,
57 Ill. 109 (1870)
A-That
Judge Michael A. Forti with Brazen disregard for the laws openly tried “fixing”
said case demonstrating a Prima Facie showing ofBias and or Prejudiceconduct
pursuant to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does
not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial
Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409
U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
44.)That judge Silva, Powers and Forti has demonstrated an unknown
interest in this matter which has blinded his objectivity in adjudicating the
merits of this matter, due to the aforementioned; Sup Ct. Rule 63 (c) (1)
(d) mandates disqualification where the judge has an interest in the
proceeding. (eff. April 16, 2007).
A
judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law.
Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures.
Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’
schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to
clearly stated rules breed disrespect for and discontent with our justice
system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its
tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
a.Fraud upon the court is
a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276
(9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th
Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to
whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil
Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed.
1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it
effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64
S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United
States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
b.“A judge is an officer of
the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid
by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88
Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A
void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it
would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or
efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement.
30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d227-232
c.“A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be
absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support
a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation,
ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment,
order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or
collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill.
App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
That under 18
U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion
on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v.
Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
Under penalties as provided by
law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements
set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein
stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
PO Box 490075
Chicago, IL. 60649
312 965-6455
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays
for the Relief
1.For an Order Vacating all
Court Orders resulting to Respondent being a victim to illegal court assemblies
featuring orders that are a Nullity and
Disqualifying Judge Rosa Marie Silva and Patrick Powers Instanter for the
Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon the Laws and Perjury, and For an Order transferring this matter to a Judge in
the Federal venue due to Corruption and
Fraud;
2.For
an Order, alternatively, Transferring this matter to Rolling Meadows Court
Instanter
3.For an Order issuing a
Mandatory Injunction of HFS/Child Support Enforcement to Prohibit said unit
from prosecuting any more cases until an investigation is had ascertaining all
parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise Extortion Conspiracies
A-That said Assistant States Attorneys be
referred for Law License be REVOKED INSTANTER for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and every other ASA involved.
4.For
an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all Assistant
States Attorneys, Clerks and State employees involved in this matter;
5.For the entry of an Order
awarding to your Respondent for such
other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this
court may deem overwhelmingly just;
RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO
DISQUALIFY JUDGE ROSA MARIE SILVA & PATRICK POWERS INSTANTER FOR “CAUSE”
PERJURY DUE TO ILLEGAL COURT HEARINGS STATES ATTORNEYS COLLUDED WITH CERTAIN
COOK COUNTYJUDGES AND UNLAWFULLY HAD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE COURT KNOWING THE
STATES ATTORNEY NEVER NOTIFIED HIM THE MATTER WAS REFILED DUE TO IRISH AND
POLISH ETHNIC JUDGES ALLOWED THEIR FORMER COLLEAGUE JOSEPH V RODDY (DECEASED) AND
OTHER RACIST MEMBERS OF THE STATES ATTORNEY S OFFICE TO AID AND ASSIST IN USING
THAT STATE AGENCY TO HELP EXTORT MONEY AS JUDGE PATRICK POWERS FORUM SHOPPED
JUDGES PATRICIA FALLON, JAMES SHAPIRO WHO RECUSED THEMSELVES BUT HE ENGINEERED
THE UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS ON BEHALF OF ROSA MARIE SILVA AS SHE WENT ALONG WITH
EVERY CRIMINAL ACT AND BECAME A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS”
& MAKING HER/HIS COURT ORDERS A NULLITY CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN THIS
DIABOLICAL EXTORTION OPERATION IN THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF COOK COUNTY MAKING
ALL ORDERS A NULLITY VOID IN ITS ENTIRETY BECAUSE NO JUDGE HAD LEGAL AUTHORITY
ON THE RESPONDENT ASA NORA RAMIREZ MATRANGA DID NOT PREPARE THE COURT ORDER AS
ILL DEPT OF HEALTHCARE AND FAMILY SERVICES REPRESENTING RESPONDENT AS ASA
RHONDA HAWKINS-LYKE DID AS JUDGES SILVA AND POWERS SIGNED ACTING AS DE FACTO
ATTORNEYS FOR FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER AS JUDGES ARE DEMONSTRATING A PRIMA FACIE
SHOWING RACIAL INJUSTICE/JIM CROW LAWS ARE ACTIVE IN COOK COUNTY COURTS DUE TO
HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001
(a) (2,3) THIS IS HOW THEY COVER-UP THE FACT STATES ATTORNEY IS AND HAS BEEN
REPRESENTING A POLICE OFFICER ILLEGALLY ON A CASE RICHARD J. DALEY DISMISSED
SEPT 17, 1987 (85 D 068184), AND DEFAULTED ON MAY 18, 1988 NEVER ORDERED THE
PAYMENT OF ANY CHILD SUPPORT BECAUSE DEFENDANT WAS NEVER SERVED AND DEFAULT WAS
NEVER VACATED AND WITH TOTAL CORROBORATION OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGES IN COOK COUNTY
NOT FOLLOWING ANY RULES OF ILLINOIS CIVIL PROCEDURES OR ANY LAWS IN ACCORDANCE
TO ILLINOIS STATUTES BUT AS“PRIVATE
CITIZENS”, THEY ARE ENGAGING IN A PRIMAE FACIE SHOWING IN AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACYCIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING
UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES BY MAKING EGREGIOUS PERJURED BEFORE
KANGAROO TRIBUNALS IMPERSONATING LAWFUL COURTSMAKING EVERY COURT ORDERVOID/NULLITY CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY CALVIN
EVANS, FORMER STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX, ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL,
GOV JB PRITZKER, COOK COUNTY SHERIFF TOM DART, JUDGE IRIS Y. CHIVIRA AND
FRANCOISE HIGHTOWER RECEIVED SUMMARY JUDGMENT DEC 4, 2023 AND NEVER DENIED TO
ANY OF THE PLEADINGS BECAUSE OF THE VERACITY RECORDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS/FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES ACTING AS
“PRIVATE CITIZENS” COMPLICIT IN THIS CHILD SUPPORT SCAM OF ILLINOIS CRIMINAL
ENTERPRISE FRAUDULENTLY FALSIFYING COURT DOCUMENTS CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE
REMANDED INTO CUSTODY 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT AND THE CTA NOT
REINSTATING HIM BACK TO WORK BECAUSE THEY DESTROYED HIS EMPLOYMENT RECORDS
TRYING TO COVER-UP JUDGES ALLOWING EXTORTION OF HIS WAGES TO POLICE OFFICER
& JUDGE MANUFACTURING AN UNLAWFUL WARRANT IN THIS CONSPIRACY AND IS SEEKING
$50 MILLION DOLLARS w/AFFIDAVIT(filed Dec. 4, 2023) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
ILLINOIS (735 ILCS 5/2-1005) & FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
CORROBORRATING THE VERACITY COOK COUNTY JUDGES DO NOT HONOR DUE PROCESS OR
CIVIL RIGHTS EQUAL PROTECTION TO IT’S CITIZENS PRO SE OR WITH ATTORNEYS IN ANY
OF THE COURT’S w/AFFIDAVIT AND SERVED ON THE ENTIRE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY AND
NEVER DENIED THE LEGAL INSTRUMENT (FILED JULY 14, 2025)
IJoe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Motion to Disqualify to all parties recorded in said Notice via
regular/electronic delivery.
Please be advised that on Nov. 10, 2025 Respondent has filed
before this Domestic Relations Division
Motion to Disqualify Rosa Marie Silva and Patrick Powers et al; and will
present said legally sufficient instrument before any Judge2025 in her stead at 9:30 am
via zoom.
The undersigned hereby
certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be emailed
to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm onNov 10, 2025 .
Respectfully, Submitted,
__________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
Post Office Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill 60649
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF COOK)
I Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on
oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant
to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in
this instrumentare true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Tue, Nov 18 at 9:06 AMAttention Board Members:You have a vicious snake working in the CTA legal system who is using his racial hate and conning manipulative ability to destroy any Black person who challenges the status quo.Ken Ray has aligned himself with alleged Judges of the Ku Klux Klan or Homosexual/Bisexual arena who hates persons of Color as a Heterosexual Man you will see for yourselves the wickedness and depraved mindset he and his kind has exhausted making sure, I never was properly reinstated.No Homosexual or Bisexual Black Man will stand up to him and because he is connected to some of the worse alleged Klan judges in Cook County, they do whatever he suggests.As you can see, I am still a CTA employee Ken has allegedly made it clear to certain employees, I would never be reinstated back to the CTA over his dead body.I need you Board members to investigate this matter and see for yourselves the egregious injustices, I have experienced under Kent Stephen Ray and his racist colleagues within the judiciary.
