#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases

Friday, January 17, 2025

DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND TYRANNY IN THE FEDERAL COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS WARRANTING HOMELAND SECURITY AND ANTI-TERRORIST PERSONNEL TO INITIATE INVESTIGATIONS INTO CORRUPTION AND CLERKS DELETING COURT DOCUMENTS FROM THE DATABASE

THE JOHNSON SISTERS WERE ILLEGALLY EVICTED FROM THEIR HOME WHERE A NEGRO JUDGE JAMES T DERICO AND FREDRENNA LYLE ORCHESTRATED AND USED THEIR ETHNICITY TO PARTAKE IN TERRORIST'S CRIMINAL ACTS OF MORTGAGE FRAUD.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT RACISM AND HATE IS WIDESPREAD AND HAS INFECTED THE VERY BUILDING WHERE THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION SUPPOSED TO AFFORD US RELIEF., BUT RACISM AND TYRANNY HAS SEIZED THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY MAKING SURE PEOPLE OF COLOR NOT RECEIVE ANY JUSTICE AND WHAT IS WORSE SO MANY IN AUTHORITY SEE WRONG, KNOW WHATS TAKING PLACE IS WRONG, BUT BECAUSE SO MANY BLACK AND CERTAIN HISPANICS ARE ONLY FIGUREHEADS OR POLITICAL SLAVES, THEY WILL TURN THE OTHER CHEEK OR GO ALONG WITH RACISM SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

IN THIS CASE THESE ARE REPUBLICAN JUDGES WITH A STRONG RACIAL HATRED FOR BLACK ELDERLY WOMEN.

NOTICE NOT ONE BLACK DEMOCRAT IS SAYING ANYTHING DENOUNCING THESE TERRORISTS' ACTS BECAUSE MANY MUST STAY IN THEIR PLACE, SO MANY OF THEM WILL DISCUSS SAVING ILLEGAL MIGRANTS, NOW MAKE THAT SHIT MAKE SENSE.

NOW I NEED MY #TWITTERFRIENDS TO MAKE THIS VIRAL BRINGING ATTENTION TO WHAT THESE WOMEN ARE GOING THROUGH SO THAT THEY CAN RETURN BACK INTO THEIR HOMES.

THANK YOU, #1LOVEALL

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the United

As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust } States District Court for

2006-NC3, et al. } the Northern District of

Plaintiffs –Appellees } Illinois, Eastern Division

V }

No. 24 cv 12195 } No.

}

Monzella Y. Johnson }

Defendant-Appellant } Judge April Perry

EMERGENCY MOTION PER COURT OF APPEALS CLERKS DIRECTIVES SEEKING A COURT ORDER ACCEPTING ALL FEES IN RELATIONS TO SANCTIONS ALLOWING ALL RECORDS TO BE RE ENTERED INTO THE DATABASE AS A SUPERVISOR CLERK DELETED THE NOTICE OF APPEAL/DOCKETING STATEMENT FILED DEC 26, 2024, TRYING TO PROTECT PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES AND FILING FEES WERE DELETED FROM THE RECORD AS APPELLANT WAS NOT AWARE OR ANY DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OF ANY SANCTION FEES BUT PAID $2500 DUE TO DURESS & DESPERATION PRAYING THAT A JUDGE READ AND SEE APPELLANTS AS RETIRED WOMEN SENIOR CITIZENS ARE VICTIMS OF MORTGAGE FRAUD, RACIAL INJUSTICES, A JUDICIAL COMPLAINT WAS FILED ON THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AS SHE BECAME A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” UPHOLDING ALL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IGNORING THE FACTS OF CASE BEING CLOSED AS THE RECORD DEMONSTRATES HOW A CERTIFIED COURT ORDER (OCT. 29, 2024) OF JUDGE PAMELA GILLESPIE VACATING FORECLOSURE JUNE 10, 2010 AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE COURT 5TH DIVISION DEC. 30, 2011, CORROBORATES HOW CERTAIN JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS HAVE INDUCED RELIANCE ON THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS TO ILLEGALLY EVICT APPELLANTS FROM THEIR HOME ON “FRAUDULENT” DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, VIOLATING SECTION 42 USC 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE & ISSUE A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES WITH A BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER WHERE A SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS FILED BEFORE THE DISTRICT COURT ABOUT THE FACTS OF THIS CASE AS PARTICULARIZED PURSUANT TO FED RULE CIV P 8, 9, REQUIRE THAT APPELLANT’S TO PARTICULARIZE THEIR ALLEGATIONS OF “FRAUD ON THE COURT” IN AS SHORT, PLAIN, AND DIRECT A WAY AS IS REASONABLE DEFENDANTS ARE HOMELESS DUE TO THIS DOMESTIC TERRORIST ILLEGAL EVICTION AS SENIOR CITIZENS CULMINATIING INTO A HATE CRIME BY CLERKS AND OTHER DEMOCRATIC OR RACIST PERSONNEL

1.) That Appellant never received Notice or Knowledge on any Sanction fees was ever owed, in that on Jan 7, 2025, Appellant paid the Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee, hereto attached as Ex 1, U. S. District Court receipt.

2.) That Appellant reported back to the District Court Clerk to ascertain why the Appeal had not been Docketed per paying Ex 1, and learned that a tall Husky Lineman Hispanic presented a Court Order as Ex 2, Court Order (August 30,2021) from the Court of Appeals instructing Appellant that before an Appeal was to be Docketed a $1000.00 had to be paid.

3.) That Appellant expeditiously returned and paid the $1000.00, hereto attached, Ex 3 receipt Jan. 10, 2025.

4.) Appellant learned that a Supervisor Lorenzo Deleted the Notice of Appeal/Jurisdictional Statement from the Database showing that the Appellant timely filed the Appeal on Dec 26, 2024.

5.) Appellant exhausted the Chain of Command and obtained a Docket Sheet from Clerk Katie in the Court of Appeals so as to ascertain what was on the document and learned that a Sanction Order of $2500.00 that was never provided to the Appellant, Page 3 of the Docket Sheet 01/13/2025 Received Notification from the U.S. District Court …….regarding a partial sanction payment of $1000.00 which is falsely stated because Ex 2 is the only Court Order that was ever presented which demonstrates a Prima facie showing of a Certain Clerk in the Court of Appeals with incredible influence was working with a District Court Supervisor meticulously obstructing the laws violating Appellants Civil Rights trying to make sure no judge ever receive knowledge of what was taken place in the courts.

6.) The Clerk in the District Court was in full collaboration with a Court of Appeals Clerk because nowhere in the District Courts Docketing Sheet is any payments received from the Appellant.

7.) That Appellant PAID the unlawful sanctions of $1500.00 + $1000.00 = $2500.00 but the Appellees had the Appellants unlawfully EVICTED FROM THEIR HOME and not one person has been Prosecuted or Investigated for the Criminal Civil Rights Violations perpetrated and Particularized pursuant to Fed Rules Civ Pr. 8, 9., Ex 4.

8.) That the Docket Sheet for the District Court is fraught with egregious inconsistencies,

A- That nowhere in the Sheet does it reflect, the Appellant was Restricted from filing any documents or was Sanctioned.

B- Page 6, Line 19, 12-13-2024 Case was not a Mortgage Foreclosure case because it was vacated June 10, 2010, and Affirmed by the Appellate Court Dec 30, 2011.

C- Page 6, Line 20, 12-13-2024, MAIL RETURNED, HOW CAN AN order be mailed Dec 13, 2024 be returned the same day?

D- That Judge Perry Deputy Clerk James did not receive the Motions per the judges Directives Appellant was complying with until 4:30pm via email, 12/13/2024 so how was the judge able deny the case when the documents were tendered after business hours?

E- That most importantly, why would a Supervisor DELETE FEDERAL RECORDS from the database and evidence Appellant paid all fees but never returned her fees did they steal the money?

F- That the Appellees have brazenly admitted consistently violating Appellants Civil Rights in trying to steal their home and owning certain members of the judiciary and because of the Appellant’s skin Color and being senior citizens no justice has been delivered by any person in authority.

G- That because the Appellants are the victims of now what is characterized as Domestic Terrorists Acts in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 with so many men or women mighty in Political Power are using their positions to Bully, harass, Lynch any person with unjust applications of the laws in an attempt to silence or prevent them from overcoming racial injustices or tyranny in any court et al.

9.) That the Honorable District Court received unopposed Emergency Motions accompanied with affidavits with court orders reflecting eviction being a Civil Rights violations and not State issues, Pembaur v. Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986)

A- The District Court ignored all evidence in Appellant’s Motion with Affidavit detailing Unprecedented acts of Conspiracy (Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a), the Emergency Motions were presented in a Legally sufficient manner and demonstrated a Prima Facie showing of Civil Rights unlawful acts lodged at appellant (64) and the amazing part is “all” Appellee’s have admitted to every gregarious Unconstitutional act by not objecting or submitting any counter-affidavits to the courts, thereby relying on members of said chain conspiracy to save them and protect them keeping them “above” the Law.

B- The District Court Engaged in an organized conspiracy violating Section IV of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, that said Democrats in the judiciary is punishing the Appellants for speaking up and fighting against the tyranny and corruption in the courts as they systematically closed their eyes to the mayhem and injustices as the Domestic Terrorists have litigiously bullied and demonstrated the Democratic Political Machine do not honor or uphold Equal Protection or Civil Rights laws to Senior Citizens, Black or Brown Citizens of Illinois, Chicago.

C- The District Court deliberately abused the adversarial process, a fundamental aspect of the adversarial system is that proceedings are to be conducted in open court. Judges have been disciplined for disposing of cases without an adversarial proceeding, In re Fitzgerald, Unreported Determination (Ky. Comm’n 1986); Holder, 74 N.J. 581, 379 A. 2d 220 (1977).

D- The District Court Judge engaged in a Terrorist Act against the Appellant violating their Civil Rights prohibiting them equal access to the courts, due to their ethnicity as an African American, Black, Brown Senior Citizen Women, (Pro Se litigant).

E- The District Court demonstrated a multitude of deliberate Improprieties in an attempt to aid and assist said Appellee’s named in the Affidavits, In Re Judge No. 93-154, 440 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. 1994), And Deception by falsifying reasons for Denying a legally sufficient Motions served on Appellee’s, In re Ferrara, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich. 1998),In re Renfer, 493 S.E. 2d 434 (N.C. 1997), In re Kroger, 702 A. 2d 64 (Vt. 1997), Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 33 Cal. 3d 359, 657 P. 2d 372, 377, 188 Cal. Rptr. 880 (1983)

F- The Federal citations warrants removal from their positions, Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline, Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 14 Cal. 3d 678, 537 P. 2d 898, 122 Cal. Rptr. 778 (1975).

10.) That the Democratic Judiciary as “Official Policy” makers the standard set forth in Monell establishing municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. 1983, municipal liability may be imposed for a single decision by municipal policy makers under appropriate circumstances; if the decision to adopt a particular course of action is directed by those who establish governmental policy, the municipality is equally responsible whether that action is to be taken only once or repeatedly.

a. “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

b. Appellant filed a Complaint against the Clerk of Cook County for allowing a Court Order backdated to Nov 21, 2024 and entered into the database after Dec 23, 2024, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Delivered Dec 30, 2024, but the Sheriff filed and Affidavit alleging an eviction order was entered but no record in the data system.

c. The Recorder of Deeds have Appellant’s property recorded 5/21/2024 with the Appellate Court Affirming Vacating Foreclosure, Ex B.

d. The Recorder of Deeds have a plethora of “Fraudulent” entries 12/26/ 2024 Assigning a Mortgage, Ex C.

e. The Recorder of Deeds have over 30 entries for Dec 26, 2024, Releasing, Mortgage and Assignment of said property as if this was some type of Ponzi scheme, using Appellant’s property as bait, Ex D and an Email from Altisource in El Paso, Texas of Jan 9, 2025, “BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE DISPOSAL OF THESE ITEMS. I WOULD LIKE TO OFFER YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO REMOVE YOUR PERSONAL BELONGINGS”, Ex E.

f. Finally, Unbeknownst to the Appellees and alleged Domestic Terrorists, Appellants had placed their property in a Quick Claim Deed Trust 9/23/24 and it was recorded 10/16/24 as Ex F.

The United States Supreme Court acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.

11.) That on Oct 29, 2024, Respondent had the 9 Page Memorandum Opinion and Order from Caucasian Judge of Jewish ethnicity VACATED the FORECLOSURE June 3, 2010, hereto attached Receipt and Certified Order as Ex 1.

A- That no Negro Democratic judge, or mostly Irish or of Polish ethnicity will ever rule in favor of the Respondents due to the Judiciary being RACIST & CORRUPT many will go along to get along said case is 16 years old and the Paternity case is almost 40 years old, with over 50 Democratic judges involved, this is how Lynchings are done in this City or State replacing the ROPES by invoking unjust applications of the laws and recruiting Inferior Colored People to use their ethnicity as Jim Crow Laws are still being Enforced in Illinois Courts.

B- That Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. An INNOCENT MAN was DISMISSED from a Paternity Case fraught with “Fraudulent” allegations by the only Person of Irish Ethnicity, Former States Attorney and Mayor Richard J. Daley Dismissed Sept 17, 1987, (85 D 068184) and has never been served or had any paternity tests as Democrats undermined the same legal system using Inferior Negros and Colored or Racist Democrats to undermine the same laws by REMANDING HIM into Custody 5 times for allegedly owing child support on (88 D 079012) a case that was DISMISSED and worse they had to back date the age of the adult woman, as Racist Asst States Attys “Fraudulently” manufactured documents to make Tycee Hightower a minor to justify bringing him into the courts illegally for not making any child support payments to a Police Officer knowing, that he is not the biological father.

12.) That the Appellate Court AFFIRMED, Ex 1, hereto attached as Ex A by unanimous decision of the APPELLATE FULL COURT.

13.) That a Complaint was filed before the Federal Agency CFPB hereto attached as Gr Ex 2, where US Bank on Page 4, Par 1 US Bank “Responded the Complaint does not belong to them”.

14.) That Page 5, Lines 21-22 July 30, 2024, PHH notified said Federal Agency via that “If you would like to know more about the foreclosure status, contact the foreclosure attorney et al.”

15.) That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”

16.) That PHH Mortgage sent a letter Oct 18, 2024, from Ajitpal Janjue, Consumer Account Analyst, hereto attached as Gr Ex 3, Par 2, Since Potestivo & Associates, P.C. is not authorized to obtain information about this account, all communication regarding this request will be sent to the primary account holder this address.

A- Pursuant to PHH of Ex 3, Par the Primary Account Holder is Monzella Johnson, Marcia Johnson 5217 S. Ingleside Ave, Chicago, Ill. 60615-4307.

B-

17.) That Respondent dispatched an email to judge Derico and Courtesy Copies to all parties, hereto attached Ex 4, Oct 15, 2034 at 11:33am Respondent’s Official Response to the Oct 9. 2024 et al.

That FRAUD was committed Inducing Reliance on the Cook County Sheriff’s Department U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. —U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues. -Id.

Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality. -Id.

CONSPIRACY

Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

INDUCING RELIANCE

To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

18.) That from the EVICTION UNIT, 10/16/2024 said letter was immediately mailed saying FINAL NOTICE That because of the above, hereto attached, Gr Ex 5, Motion to Disqualify Democratic Judge Michael A. Forti Instanter for “Cause” Perjury & Vacate September 19, 2024 Court Order Due to Hate Bias Prejudice Pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-1001 (a) (2,3) Trying to Cover-Up The States Attorney is and Has Been Representing A Police Officer Illegally on a case Richard J. Daley Dismissed Sept. 17, 1987 with total Corroboration of Democratic Judges in Cook County not Following any Rules of Illinois Civil Procedures or in accordance to Illinois Statutes but as Private Citizens et al. ; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

A- That Page 4, Par D reflects how Blacks and certain Hispanics are REWARDED within the DEMOCRATIC PARTY, That the Political Machine rewarded every Black or Colored person who participated in the creation or falsification of any documents or kept their mouths shut or snitched on those trying to help him against the Respondent for the alleged Ku Klux Klan judges and attorneys Lester Barclay is the President of the CTA, William Stewart Boyd became a judge and a monster!, Iris Chavira allegedly received a judicial position not qualified one bit, etc. but as long as a Black and certain Hispanics destroy their own ethnic groups, they will be rewarded a position in the Democratic Party.

B- That Page 8 Par B, Anytime a racist Irish have the audacity to say to an innocent man “today is your lucky day, I can’t LOCK YOU UP anymore” judge Timothy P. Murphy or a Polacca David E. Haracz tells you, “I know that you are not the BIOLOGICAL FATHER, I’m just the BILL COLLECTOR” or the other polacca Ronald Bartkowicz issues a BOGUS WARRANT as a former CTA attorney trying to help keep his racist Brethren from being discovered at the CTA (admit to everything as being accurate in the Motion to Disqualify him and compliments the Motion and asks the Respondent “How did you know, that I use to work for the CTA?”) who stole said wages while off work injured on duty and to cover-up all of the illegal wage garnishees sent to her racist Irish attorney representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer, there is a huge problem in the judiciary, A HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN OR WOMAN cannot receive Equal Justice or Equal Protection within the laws OF THIS CITY OR STATE, when these racist hateful individuals have found a way to circumvent the United States Constitution and still enforce Jim Crow laws which has been outlawed by the U.S. Supreme Court as demonstrated though out this case. #JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2012/08/chronology-of-unlawful-contempt-charges.html? A Certified Affidavit Notarized ignored by racist States Attorney Dick Devine.

g. To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);

19.) That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

20.) Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Respondent’s Pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280., in that all attorneys and Bank Associates were relying on the judges to put their careers on the line saving every racist Bank Personnel as demonstrated in this matter.

a. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)

21.) The Cook County Sheriff’s CANCELED the Eviction 4/24/2024, but never did an Attorney file any legal documents in the Circuit Court of Cook County to Vacate the Eviction Cancellation.

22.) One can easily infer, That on Oct. 16, 2024 someone received a financial kickback causing the manufacturing of the Cook County Eviction Unit to mail out a FINAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, where the evidence demonstrated by the Preponderance of the Evidence legal standards Negro Judge Fredrenna Lyle nor James T. Derico ever had any jurisdiction to ENTER ANY ORDERS, due to them acting as “Private Citizens” in this Terrorist Mortgage Fraud Criminal Conspiracy” in viciously trying to have Respondents who are senior citizens illegally EVICTED FROM THEIR HOME.

a. That the signed Court Order as of June 2, 2010, by Cook County Judge Gillespie “THIS COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VACATES THE JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE FOR LACK OF A PROPER AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT”

The Affidavit that the Appellees presented to the Court of Cook County was an AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

23.) Finally, in your documents Page 66, 67 of the PDF, The Judicial Sales (filed in the Recorder of Deeds with Karen Yarborough) Pamela Murphy-Boylan, President CEO of the Judicial Sales states that the property was sold Nov 21, 2021 for ZERO MONEY with no CITY or REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAXES, and Deed to Property was illegally Transferred and a Notary illegally attesting to crimes, due to a plethora of operatives engaging in a sophisticated Mortgage Fraud Scheme that has now been CORROBORATED AND ADMITTED TO BY PHH REPRESENTATIVES WITH THEIR INVALID DOCUMENTS.

24.) In replying to Page 2 Par 1, YOU HAVE NO CONTRACT, NO AGREEMENT AND NO FORECLOSURE SALE, THE WHOLE TRANSACTION IS FRAUDLULENT COMPRISED OF A PLETHORA OF CRIMINAL ELEMENTS AND ALTISOURCE HAD SOMEONE TO BREAK IN OUR HOME ONCE AND CHANGED OUR LOCKS LOCKING US OUT OF OUR HOUSE AND KEEPS TRESPASSING BY PLACING DOCUMENTS ON OUR PROPERTY AS SENIOR CITIZENS AND FED UP AND AS A RETIRED POLICE OFFICER, IT APPEARS NOBODY IS GOING TO BE SATISFIED UNTIL SOMEBODY IS IN A BODY BAG.

25.) The question is how money was paid to the Negro judges selling out their ethnic groups trying to undo what qualified Caucasian Judges did correctly?

IT APPEARS THE DEMOCRATS HAVE A SOPHISTICATED WAY OF STEALING HOMES AND IT IS BEING COVERED-UP BY DEMOCRATIC JUDGES.

1.) That Judge Lyle never had jurisdiction and violated the very laws violating her Oath “ENGAGED IN TREASON OFFENSES, (MAY 5, 2021) ENTERED AN ORDER 2 YEARS SEVEN MONTHS LATER TO U.S. BANK from her other Order Vacating Court Orders she never had jurisdiction.

2.) Judge Robert Adrian, a veteran judge in downstate Quincy, Illinois, faced removal from the bench due to his controversial actions. In 2022, he reversed a guilty ruling against a young man in a sexual assault case. The Illinois Courts Commission issued a rare decision, stating that Adrian attempted to circumvent the state’s mandatory minimum sentencing law during a sentencing hearing for Drew Clinton, who was previously found guilty of sexually assaulting 16-year-old Cameron Vaughan at a 2021 graduation party. Adrian justified his reversal by claiming that the Adams County prosecutor had “totally failed” to prove Clinton’s guilt, but the commission saw this as a subterfuge. They concluded that the judge intentionally circumvented the law to satisfy his personal belief about a just sentence, resulting in the reversal of the criminal defendant’s conviction1.

h. Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.

i. “A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d 227-232

j. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)

1.) That all parties acted as “PRIVATE CITIZENS” and engaged in numerous “TREASON OFFENSES”, “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” as Judge Lyle aided and abetted in numerous crimes using her robe trying to help said Plaintiffs

Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million Jury Verdict Against City in Shooting Incident

Wednesday, February 24, 2021 Julie Tappendorf

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7 million in damages relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.

According to the court opinion, the plaintiff claimed that a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an argument when the two had been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain and other injuries. The friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the shooting, arguing that the City was responsible for the officer's conduct. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that the City's failure to have an "early warning system" to identify officers who might engage in misconduct, failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers who engage in misconduct, and the "code of silence" among police officers contributed to the shooting incident. The City argued that the officer was off duty and not acting under "color of state law" at the time of the shooting, so the City was not liable under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. The case made its way to a jury which found the City of Chicago liable and awarded $44.7 million in damages to the plaintiff. The jury found that two of the City's policies - its failure to maintain an adequate early warning system and failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers - caused the officer to shoot his friend.

The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer. The Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's federal rights were violated, the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict against the City of Chicago.

a. Jim Crow Laws are being managed and instituted by the Black Gate Keepers within the Democratic Party many of the alleged Black leaders are mere figureheads enforcing the same hate and discriminatory doctrines of the fraternal hate organization, that which many of the Blacks and certain Brown persons have accepted being Inferior to Anglo-Saxons doing whatever they are told by keeping their mouths shut, keeping their eyes closed to any crimes perpetrated by certain Caucasians and ears deaf to any person of color complaining about any aspect of injustices and in this case Lyle is making sure said women being First Responders, senior citizens retired Civil Servants, Police Officer and Educator from the Chicago Board of Education not receive any avenue of justice forsaking her own career protecting corrupt Anglo-Saxons. .

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Appellant respectfully Prays for the Relief

1. For an Order Accepting the Fees and Removing all Sanctions and Return the Sanctions and Remands on all Parties responsible for EVICTING Appellants from their home and all Domestic Terrorists Acts associated in this matter Instanter.

2. For an Order Granting the Stay of Execution of Altisource, Cook County Sheriff’s from removing any personal effects from the 5217 S. Ingleside property Instanter until said matter is finally adjudicated on appeal.

3. For an Order reimbursing all fees and costs and Sanctions to the Appellant for the enforcement of this matter;

4. For an Order issuing a Mandatory Injunction on the Enforcement of all Foreclosures Prohibit the Evictions of any persons until a Special Prosecutor is appointed to investigate all parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise.

A- That said Attorneys Law Firms and be referred for Law Licenses be REVOKED INSTANTER for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and brought before the Grand Jury for additional Charges.

5. For an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all Attorneys, and State employees involved in this matter;

6. For an Order Having the U.S. Marshall’s Instanter to effect Notice and Service on all judges and Altisource personnel in El Paso Texas making sure none of the personal effects are affected as a means of retaliation for the enforcement of this matter.

7. For the entry of an Order awarding to your Appellant for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

Respectfully submitted,

________________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

5217 S. Ingleside Ave

Chicago, Il 60615

Frogishtwo65@gmail.com

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the United

As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust } States District Court for

2006-NC3, et al. } the Northern District of

Plaintiffs –Appellees } Illinois, Eastern Division

V }

No. 24 cv 12195 } No.

}

Monzella Y. Johnson }

Defendant-Appellant } Judge April Perry

NOTICE OF

NOW COMES the Moving Party, Monzella Y. Johnson (“Appellant”), hereby properly Noticing the Appellees with this Motion and all of its attachments to all parties Noticed in the Certificate of Service except Cook County Sheriff’s Police per Directive to email them first {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedures}:

Respectfully submitted,

________________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

Frogishtwo65@gmail.com

Chicago, Il 60615

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Please be advised that on Jan 17, 2025, Appellant has filed before this Court of Appeals, Emergency Motion Per Court of Appeals Clerks et al;

I have caused Courtesy Copies to be had on all of the following via electronic service email/regular mail except Cook County Judges per the Directive of the Cook County Sheriff’s Police, Molly Adams, molly.adams@ccsheriff.org; whereby, United States Marshall’s have to provide Service and Notice.

To:

Clerk of the Circuit Court

courtclerk@cookcountycourt.com Attorney General

50 West Washington, Suite 1001 Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov

Chicago, Ill. 60601 555 West Monroe Suite 1300

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Cook County Sheriff’s

Tom Dart

50 West Washington, Suite 702

email CCSO@ccsheriff.org

Chg. IL 60601

Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov

To: Hon Michael A. Forti CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov

Hon. Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov

Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov

Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov

Hon Derico mfmlcalendar56@cookcountyil.gov

Jaime Barcus jaime.barcas@cookcountyil.gov

sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov

Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

Eileen Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov

statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov

The Crusader Newspaper Group State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov

Managing Editor Sharon Fountain Illinois State Police

sfountain@chicagocrusader.com

Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago Ill. 60653

Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org

Dir. FBI, Hon Mayor Brandon

Special Agent in Charge (FBI) City Hall 7th floor

Chicago, IL. 60601

2111 West Roosevelt Road

Chicago, Il 60608

President/CEO Rick Aneshansel US Bank Natl. Assoc. rick.aneshansel@usbank.com

Registered Agent: Grace A. Gorka US Bank Natl. Assoc.

190 S. LaSalle,

grace.gorka@usbank.com ggorka@usbank.com

Chg. IL 60603

JSC_General@atgf.com Pamela Murphy-Boylan President CEO of the (TJSC)

RPerdew@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm

simon.feng@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm

pmal@potestivolaw.com Potestivo Law Firm

chicagodocket@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm

Potestivo & Ass., PC U.S. Attorney

Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal 219 South Dearborn

ipleadings@potestivolaw.com Chicago, Il 60604

bthompson@potestivolaw.com

223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite 610

Chicago, IL. 60606

________________________

Respectfully Submitted,

Monzella Y. Johnson

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

AFFIDAVIT

{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}

I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted Notary

____________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

Frogishtwo65@gmail.com

Chicago, Il 60615

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

HERE IS THE NOTICE OF APPEAL THAT WAS FILED DEC 26, 2024, BECAUSE THE FEDERAL COURT WAS CLOSED DEC 24, 2024.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE COURT FILES SO THAT THE JUDGES IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT WILL NOT SEE HOW THE DEMOCRATS CONTROL THE JUDICIARY AND CERTAIN CLERKS IN COOK COUNTY AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT PREVENTING GOOD JUDGES FROM MAKING A DIFFERENCE BRINGING JUSTICE TO THE INNOCENT.

RACISM AND CORRUPTION IS SYNONYMOUS WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND CERTAIN REPUBLICANS ALL OF THEM ARE FEATURED IN THIS APPEAL, SO A MYSTERIOUS COURT ORDER FROM THE COURT APPEALS WAS PRESENTED FINING THE JOHNSON SISTERS $1000 FOR FILING A FRIVOLOUS APPEAL, CLAIMING THEY HAD NO JURISDICTION.

THE AUGUST 30, 2021, COURT ORDER RE CASE 21-2264, JUDGE FEINERMAN OVERTLY VIOLATED EVERY CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE RE THIS CASE IN THE US CONSTITUTION DESPITE FILING MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY HIM, HE DENIED THE MOTIONS HIMSELF AND NEVER DID THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OR COURT OF APPEALS INTERVENE.

THE JOHNSON SISTERS PAID THE $605.00 FOR THE DOCKETING OF THE APPEAL TUESDAY JAN 7, 2025, NEVER DID A CLERK MENTION A COURT ORDER SANCTIONING THEM FOR A $1000.00

US BANK HAD A MEMBER FROM ALTISOURCE TO EMAIL THE JOHNSON SISTERS SEEKING TO REMOVE 61 YEARS OF THEIR POSSESSIONS FROM THEIR HOME, SO A CLERK ALLEGEDLY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE AND REMOVED THE NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE RECORD WITH A COURT ORDER NOT SIGNED FROM ANY JUDGE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS.

AS OF LATE YESTERDAY, THE RANK-AND-FILE ADMINISTRATORS IN THE CLERKS OFFICE INCLUDING THE MANAGER JIM OF THE COURT OF APPEALS HAVE TO PRESENT THE COURT DOCUMENTS AND RECEIPT SHOWING THAT NOT ONLY WAS THE APPEAL FILED TIMELY BUT THE UNJUST SANCTION OF $1000 HAS BEEN PAID.

IT HAS BEEN SAID THAT NOW A JUDGE HAVE TO LIFT THE SANCTION, BUT THE DEMOCRATS DON'T WANT NO JUDGE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TO SEE WHAT APRIL PERRY DID AND HOW SO MANY DEMOCRATS ARE STEALING SENIOR CITIZENS HOMES IN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES AS EVERYONE IN RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY IS REMAINING QUIET BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR AND THEM BEING SENIOR CITIZENS.

I NEED EVERYONE TO RETWEET THIS GETTING THESE WOMEN BACK INTO THEIR HOME PLEASE. THANK YOU #1LOVEALL

EMERGENCY NOTICE OF APPEAL ET AL. PER NEW LIBRARY RULES ALL PARTIES AND JUDGES ARE TO BE EMAILED FROM PERSONAL EMAIL ONCE SCANNED5

Yahoo/Sent

cookcountylawlibrary@gmail.com
From:cookcountylawlibrary@gmail.com
To:frogishtwo65@gmail.com
Cc:joelouis565@yahoo.com,pirahana1@gmail.com
Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 10:39 AM
Hello,
The attachment is the image(s) scanned by ScanEZ Station.
Thank you.
image.pdf
4MB
Joe Louis
From:joelouis565@yahoo.com
To:Kenneth Ditkowsky,Lanre Amu Railroaded by ARDC
Cc:Jaime Barcas (Chief Judge's Office),CCC DomRelCR3006 (Chief Judge's Office),Cook County States Attorney,Pamela Cummings Cook County Preckwinkle,ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the Profession
Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 9:04 AM
Professor Ken:

I hope you and your wife had a better holiday than the Johnson sisters did as well as so many other elderly senior citizens and their families victimized by Apartheid Racial Injustices in this state.

As, I digress on Monday Dec 23, the Johnson sisters received a phone call from their neighbors of criminals in their home (that's exactly who they were) so they immediately called the Police and on two occasions sets of 4 officers or units were dispatched and the second group of four filled out a non-criminal report because US bank informed them on the phone, they had a court order of them being evicted and US Bank had men in their home going through the fucking refrigerator taking food out of their freezer throwing it away.

It was explained to the Police the case was in Federal Court, and this is an illegal eviction and that, they were trying to get a judge to listen.

So, as a former High School Disciplinarian and Business Instructor for the Chicago Public Schools, I am going to give a vivid illustration of the TRUTH of a corrupt dirty judge and until the FBI, Internal Affairs and a proper investigation is had involving the Sheriffs involved, I am not going to comment on their involvement in this matter only because of my personal relationship, I have had with so many of them and being a former employee so it is definitely a conflict of interest.

For years the Cook County Sheriff's been like bodyguards to me in the midst of going before racist Ku Klux Klan acting judges every last one of them, I have had the experience of dealing with showed me respect, compassion and protected me even when judge Bartkowicz wanted me REMANDED TO COOK COUNTY JAIL where a man was hung but the Sheriff's took me home and said they were ordered to protect me, they encouraged me to keep writing and reminded me of greater men before me, Dr Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela and Malcolm X who were locked or sent to prison and look at the contributions they have made these were words from Caucasian Brothers.

The court order was handed to the Deputies in an ILLEGAL capacity because the judge handed to the law firm who instructed him what to do never had the order filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court within 2-3 business days it was 32 days later before it made it to the database only because on Christmas Eve the Manager emailed the judges Clerk because I provided them a copy of the blank court order and they had the Sheriffs Affidavit in the database and assured me they were going to get a court order.

This court order should not be in the database under no circumstances and needs to be removed and reported to the proper authorities because this order was created from the email that Milica Bilic an attorney told him to sign, they never filed any Appearances but communicated to him via emails and his dumb ass did exactly what they instructed him to do and it was not a court day but a day for his Massa doing what he is told as a "FIGUREHEAD" wearing a judges robe as a Halloween costume, his only purpose on the bench is to help racist bank attorneys steal the homes of the elderly and use his ethnicity to violate the Civil Rights of Colored and Black people.

The court order corroborates the EVICTION was not only illegal, but the order is VOID/ A NULLITY look at it, it says law division and the law firm's attorney number 42297 in the upper left-hand corner demonstrating their alleged ownership of this judge and in how they instructed him to rule, the other part is that there was no court date when the judge created the fabrication of the back dated order, the order was only done to illegally give the Sheriff's unlawful authority to evict the valid homeowners.

THE REAL COURT ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EVICTION SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN DESTROYED because there is nothing in the data system from any attorney being filed seeking an eviction, they thought the senior citizens were going to be emotionally distraught and breakdown and give up thinking US Bank was going to be victorious not with all of these law enforcement agencies involved.

Because the Cook County Judiciary is allegedly controlled by the Ku Klux Klan and alleged Homosexuals as "Untouchable" "Private Citizens" are of the mindset that nobody especially the FBI is smart enough to competently figure out they are capable of making assess out of anyone in the law arena and do whatever the fuck they desire.

These sorry ass people are more concerned on whose name goes on the bathroom and what man can join any woman's sport to beat her up and upholding the rights violent illegal immigrants and not the Civil Rights of the elderly or any senior citizens and the suppression of Civil Rights of Heterosexuals.

Now the Deputies have to file affidavits to the proper authorities telling the "TRUTH" on what document did they receive authorizing them to EVICT the senior citizens from their home?

The Democratic Party in Illinois is full of Cowards and Bullies in titled positions who are either unqualified, racist, appointed or simply need somebody to tell them what to do as in the case of Derico, this place is Chicago, Illinois version of DJANGO UNCHAINED, where judge Derico is STEPHEN, he will do anything for Massa US Bank.

Where are the real men and women at it seems like our government is in the hands of Babylon, (Sodom & Gomorrah) tyranny and chaos Black or Colored Men are easily broken, bucking them as the slave Master did during that era is very easy nowadays so many have no spine, you have to have a deep hate for your mother and any female and most importantly any woman of senior citizen status to 1.) Allegedly Pay a judge to evict them in the winter and in the holidays, 2.) Take an alleged bribe from any bank official to go along with this shit, 3.) Finally, thinking they are deluded into believing nobody is intelligent enough to see right through their wrongs!

It seems like the majority of people caught up in this case and the Bogus Paternity case 88 D 079012 internally hate who they are skin color, sexuality etc. to the point, they are using their positions to try and break or destroy a senior citizen, Colored or Black person and any Heterosexual so as to make them feel powerful because none of them have the love for God or themselves.

What are your thoughts Professor Ken?

Joe Louis

Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
image.pdf
4MB
kenneth ditkowsky
From:kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
To:Lanre Amu Railroaded by ARDC,Joe Louis,Ed Vallejo,Chicagobar Info,Cook County Bar Association
Cc:Jaime Barcas (Chief Judge's Office),CCC DomRelCR3006 (Chief Judge's Office),Cook County States Attorney,Pamela Cummings Cook County Preckwinkle,ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the Profession
Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 3:09 PM
Dear Joe,

During the 1/2 century I've practiced law I've note a bunch of truisms. The most unpleasant was the fact that there is certain verbiage, that while accurate and true in many instances turns off the "establishment."

After more than 1/2 a century in the practice of law and even having under my belt a bit of fame, pointing out the fact corruption in the Courts was more than common=place got the IARDC's panties all in a bunch and a little vendetta directed at me.

My reaction was to "fight back" and while I've been ineffective I've not given up in my quest to make the words of Article 1 section 12 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 have meaning. So far I've been very unsuccessful The outrageously wrongful suspension of JoAnne Denison and Lanre Amu still are ignored. The FINACIAL ELDER ABUSE directed at senior citizens promulgated right out of the Probate Division of the Circuit Court continues unabated and thumbs its nose at not only the statutes designed to protect the elderly but basic concepts of Justice inherent in our tradition.

Racism by those on the approved list is not less wrongful than that initiated by that of the KKK, the Nazis etc. However, the distinction is obvious and very frustrating. The double standard is alive and well - and unfortunately is here to stay. Amu - was suspended from the practice of law because of the color of his skin, ditto for others who lack clout.

When I representing a leader of the Chinese community, I was called up to address the fact that Customs had their panties in a bunch concerning some food stuff that was being imported from China in connection with a Feasible -(It was a birds nest for bird's nest soup). I agreed to the changing to name on the package and having the package delivered to me to obtain its entry and delivery. Our government thought changing the label to canine was humorous.

The foregoing not withstanding I realize that you all are going the "short stick!" I also realize that the racial discrimination that you are experience is the type that we in polite society do not talk about and claim loudly is a figment of imagination; however, it is real and it does exist whether or not our society and in particular our government is welling to recognize the same.

Wo what do we do about it?

Like in the predatory guardianship cases this is a situation that is not spoken of our thought about in civilized society. The powers that be just will not hear of it. Benign neglect is the best you can hope for - UNTIL *****.

18 USCA 4 demands that we report to the law enforcement authorities serious violations of the law. I've - to be compliance with section 4 - have added a couple of other addressees. The adjectives contained in the e-mail help express your frustration, but they do not in my opinion assist the plea for help. (The do however tell the story in a direct manner but on the other hand they provide an excuse for government doing nothing in this horrible situation - they write us off as nuts!)

I wish I could help you find a lawyer, but, I've unsuccessful in the Sallas case, the Campasano case et al - even the offering of triple damages, a reduced requirement of proof, attorney fees et al is not sufficient to get the legal profession to STAND UP AND BE COUNTED.

Best Wishes for the Holiday season -- I wish we could celebrate the courage of the legal profession in fighting for actual racial justice, the rights of the elderly, or requiring government to just do its job and ending the assault on the most vulnerable Americans.

Ken Ditkowsky
image.pdf
4MB

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

U.S. BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST MASTR ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-NC3; UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES INC.; MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, AKA “MERS”

Plaintiff

MONZELLA Y. JOHNSON

Defendant.

)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

)

______________________

Hon April Perry

Magistrate Judge

Civil Action No.

24 cv- 12195

EMERGENCY

NOTICE OF APPEAL

REQUESTING RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES COMPLICIT IN MORTGAGE FRAUD & DOMESTIC TERRORISM IN THE COURTS NO DEMOCRATIC JUDGE IN ILLINOIS WILL EVER RULE IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS ALONG WITH CERTAIN REPUBLICANS

To: See the Certificate of Service of Parties

Said case demonstrates within the parameter of the laws how the Illinois legal system is under siege, as stated in earlier affidavits, the Ku Klux Klan, pursuant to the act of 1871 Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) Remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”)

PLEASE BE ADVISED that on December 24, 2024, A Notice of Appeal and Jurisdictional Statement has been filed before the Northern District of Illinois .

Defendant is Appealing the December 13, and 23, 2024 court ruling against the manifest weight of the evidence unopposed by the Plaintiffs.

Respectfully Submitted

______________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

5217 S. Ingleside Ave.

Chicago, IL. 60615

Dated December 24, 2024

IN THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Plaintiff

MONZELLA Y. JOHNSON

Defendant.

)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

)

______________________

Hon April Perry

Magistrate Judge

Civil Action No.

24 cv- 12195

Jurisdictional Statement

Order entered: Dec 13, 2024, Dec 23, 2024

Notice of Appeal filed: December 24, 2024

1.) The Court April Perry stated, “Defendant is attempting to remove PENDING state court case 2008 CH 33616 to federal court” How is it the case was DISMISSED AND AFFIRMED by the Appellate Court Vacated 16 years ago is still pending your Honor?

Statutes: Democratic Judges violating United States Supreme Court Rulings Enforcing “Jim Crow Laws” Mortgage Fraud, Violations of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, “Trespassing upon the Laws” “No Jurisdiction on case, Order being Void a “Nullity” Obstruction of Justice ” Committing Fraud, Engaging in Treason Like Offenses, Judges Committing Perjury, Judges aiding and abetting in a Criminal Conspiracy, Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Judge acting outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, as “Private Citizens” outlawed by the United States Supreme Court as they used their robes and jurisdiction to aid and assist Terrorist Democratic Judges and Public Officials in covering-up Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Racial Hate Crimes, Slander and Defamation of Character, Civil Rights Violations, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies by Democrats, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations, Violation of Canon Ethics : A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. Canon 2: A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities. Canon 3: A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

The State of Illinois Appellate Court Affirmed the Vacating the Judgment of Foreclosure Dec 30, 2011 and Presiding Judge issued a nine-page Memorandum Opinion and Order Vacating the Sale and Judgment of Foreclosure, June 3, 2010.

Defendant is appealing to the Court of Appeals, for a Reversal Sanctions and Remand with instructions notifying Federal authorities based on the foregoing stated above:

Defendant has Due-Diligently been fighting to keep their home from unlawfully being stolen from them in the disguise as foreclosure before the Supreme Court of Illinois, District Court and now before the Court of Appeals for over 16 years racist political judges have “Trespassed upon the Laws” entering Orders that are “VOID” a “NULLITY” pursuant to the laws of the United States Supreme Court as judges used their robes and unlawful authority to maintain a Democratic “Lynching” of the laws on the Appellants as senior citizens in that every Black and Brown person in the Democratic Party kept their mouths shut because they are powerless over Anglo Saxon men in the Democratic Party and they are only figureheads.

Defendant is appealing to the Court of Appeals, because Anglo Saxon judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored, the fact Defendants are victims of an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” perpetrated by Democratic judges acting as “Private Citizens” controlling the Criminal Enterprise in all of the courts controlled by Democrats, in that Judge April Perry entered a “FRAUDULENT” admission in the court order to obstruct and corroborate her role as an alleged “White Supremacist stating that Defendant was served in 2008, nowhere in the record is there any mentioning of this nor did the Plaintiffs oppose the veracity of all pleadings accompanied with affidavits.

Judge Perry closed her eyes to all of the criminal acts of Democratic Judges violating Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of the Defendant’s as she became the “Defacto” attorney for US Bank condoning all Terrorist Treason offenses accompanied by an affidavit unimpeached by every attorney supporting the Plaintiff by violating the Civil Rights of the Defendants showing her hate and contemptuousness demeanor at the Senior Citizens of African American descent

“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value, unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3 Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).

A- That Judge Perry had knowledge affidavits of Plaintiff US Bank being served via Registered Agent through electronic delivery, Nov. 26, 2024 on the Notice of Removal from State Court, Judge ignored the fact, Plaintiffs never responded in 14 days entered an ORDER, Deemed a Nullity The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline. Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 14 Cal. 3d 678, 537 P. 2d 898, 122 Cal. Rptr. 778 (1975). Vaughn 462 S.E. 2d 728 (Ga. 1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a judge from office for disregarding defendant’s constitutional rights.

B- That Plaintiff filed an Emergency Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures w/ Affidavit Dec 16, 2024. Judge Perry became a “Private Citizen” (after Plaintiffs admitted to all of the Pleadings of Judges colluding with them in said “Criminal Organized Conspiracy”) categorically DENIED the Motion, Dec 13, 2024 Court Order et al.

C- That Defendant filed an Emergency Motion for Reconsideration due to Fraud & Misrepresentations to the court Vacate all Judgments due to Democratic Judges entering orders being “VOID” A “NULLITY” case being “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TRESON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”, Judge April Perry demonstrated and corroborated her Racist Bias animus hatred at the Senior Citizens homeless to the heinous criminal acts of them being unlawfully evicted, DENIED said Motion, (Denied Dec 23, 2024)

D- That April Perry corroborated her involvement in this Criminal Enterprise by using her robe to facilitate her authority in denying any and all claims Defendant put before her court showing the FBI and this Honorable Court her depraved indifference to the United States Constitution and people of Color now that she is an untouchable federal judge.

E- That Judge April Perry is demonstrating unequivocally using her robe and jurisdiction to racially OPPRESS, LYNCH INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR, AS IF THEY WERE ROPES, DOGS OR WATERHOSES BY APPLYING UNLAWFUL APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS IN AN TYRANNICAL TERRORIST MANNER, not fearing any retributions because of her fraternal brethren in the Seventh Circuit, allegedly will DENY ANY DOCUMENT Pro Se’s or individuals of color who presents valid legal claims before that circuit they will be SYSTEMATICALLY DISMISSED.

F- That Defendant and other innocent Litigants of color cases have appeared before JUDGES ALLEGEDLY DESCRIBED AS MEMBERS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, NAZI FRATERNAL ORDER OR WHITE NATIONALIST MEMBERS who have systematically denied all of their claims as outlined in the aforementioned history of cases.

G- That former States Attorney Kim Foxx, Illinois Attorney General, Kwame Raoul, and Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Murphy, former Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan, have admitted via Summary Judgment and Default judgment (filed Feb. 2024) as Democratic judges incite hateful rulings not in accordance to any Civil Rights laws “the fact Negroes in the Democratic Party have no authority over Racist Anglo- Saxons” Pages 7-8 of the Affidavit, Summary Judgment have been admitted to via Local Rule 56.1

H- “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”

I- That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. Plaintiff complied with said rule but the court was a law unto himself.

J- Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017) Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times, Posner elaborated on his concerns about the treatment of such litigants.

A- “The basic thing is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of a federal judge,” Posner said.

In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.

Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.

Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.

A- US Bank has admitted to a plethora of Criminal Civil Rights violations along with the names of every judge in Illinois who have colluded with them helping them steal colored persons homes via every SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIDAVITS, COURT TRANSCRIPTS, ORAL TESTIMONY ETC.

News about Mayor Lightfoot Calling Racism A Public Health Crisis June 17, 2021

bing.com/news

“PRIOR HISTORY OF SYSTEMIC RACIAL HATE CRIMES OF JUDGES OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE UPHOLDING “ORGANIZED CRIMINAL TERRORIST ACTS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGES WHEN SAID DEFENDANTS WERE BEFORE THE COURTS AS PRO SE LITIGANTS”

1.) That pursuant to Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration filed November 4, 2016 judge Yeghiayan became complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy” by “Trespassing upon the Laws” using his robe and judicial authority to cover-up the “Treason Offenses” engaged upon by other Democratic judges and operatives in the Terrorist Criminal Enterprise in Cook County.

2.) That judge Yeghiayan had his law clerk to call the Defendant’s on Oct. 24, 2016 at 9:00am telling them to be in court Nov. 3, 2016 at 9:00am.

3.) That Defendant’s appeared in court pursuant to the judge’s directive and learned he had dismissed the case Nov. 2, 2016 remanding the matter back to the Criminal Enterprise of Cook County.

TO FURTHER AMPLIFY DEMOCRATIC JUDGE YEGHIAYAN’S participation in what is now described as a Hate Crime corroborating his role in an “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” aiding and assisting the Plaintiff’s in trying to steal their home

That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

A- That the court became a law unto themselves denied said motion and became “Private Citizens” not having any jurisdiction over the Defendant making all Orders a “Nullity”.

B- To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9^th Cir. 1989);

C- A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

The request for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:

Rule 26 is new; it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.

Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.

That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook County judges violating the RICO ACT, the 7^th Cir. Held that the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;

PETITION FOR REVIEW & PETITION TO TRANSFER THIS CASE TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL

To the Honorable Judicial Conference Committee et al. of the United States:

Complainant a United States Citizen, Monzella Y. Johnson, hereby respectfully represents as Pro Se shows this Judicial Conference Committee with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be reviewed and Transferred to another Judicial Council within the United States.

Now comes Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144, to show that Judge April Perry, and a plethora of other Democratic judges has Trespassed upon the Laws in an arrogant “Contemptuous manner” the Seventh Circuit, Judicial Council has ignored all sufficient motions with affidavits, stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction; motions corroborating judicial corruption “fraud” “perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the courts that the District Court ignored and holding Racism Corruption in the courts.

STATUTES: Trespassers of the Laws, Treason, hereto attached, Group Ex. A, Summary Judgment (filed Dec. 4, 2023) and Default Judgment (filed detailing just how said judges engaging in acts of Treason likened to “Weapons of Mass Destruction” destroying innocent lives like the Defendant;

Respectfully Submitted

_____________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

Frogishtwo65@gmail.com

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).

In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.

As the color line itself solidified at the turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed on black people clear tactical disadvantages: restricted economic possibilities, narrow educational opportunities, inadequate housing options, high rates of death and disablement, persistent unemployment, and unrelenting poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow represented the race problem described by Gunnar Myrdal (1898–1987) in his 1944 treatise The American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that created the race quandary; whites constructed the obstacles African Americans confronted, while also blaming them for their conditions, denying them access to the resources of problem solving, and daring them—under threat of violence—to complain, protest, or advance.

Finally, protests or challenges to Jim Crow often proved futile, given law enforcement’s complicity in the structure. From emancipation to the turn of the century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders, red shirts, and other white terrorists intimidated African Americans with personal attacks, school burnings, and lynchings. African Americans rarely served as policemen, sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the 1950s and 1960s, the connections between municipal and state governments, law enforcement, and racial violence were well known by officials and citizens alike. White officers were known to harass black people, disrupt black neighborhoods, and assault black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied satisfactory counsel, and serving harsh sentences, African Americans were further disadvantaged in the courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel, nor could they serve on juries. When black lawyers could appear in the courtroom to argue cases, white judges and juries rarely listened. All-white juries decided against black defendants, even in the most obvious cases of innocence, but rarely convicted white defendants, despite evidence of guilt. African Americans—including the innocent—suffered the harsher punishments of extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage. Even women could be placed on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks across the South.

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion….and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”

Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) the “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.

1.) “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”

2.) A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

I affirm the above as being true.

Respectfully Submitted

_________________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

Wherefore the Foregoing Reasons, Appellant Prays for the following relief:

1.) Appellant requests that another Honorable Court of Appeals, Judicial Circuit accept Jurisdiction of this matter and Invoke authority Instanter and reassign this matter accordingly and or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights said attorneys and judges are complicit in, Order a Rule to Show Cause for Remands and Indictments on all parties associated in said Treason Offenses;

2.) Impose Sanctions/Remands against and all parties for Contempt of the United States Constitution for their crimes against the Defendant/Government

3.) Issue an Injunction on U S Bank and all judges presiding in the matter trying to steal Defendant’s home in the unlawful application of Foreclosure and relied on judges acting outside their jurisdiction committing treason offenses;

4.) Issue an Order Nullifying Voiding all orders and Chief Judge in the Court of Appeals absent a signature, due to “Fraud” “Treason” Trespassing upon the Laws” and other Civil Rights Violations;

5.) An order issuing a Moratorium on all Foreclosures in Cook County Circuit courts, Appellate Court or Supreme Court of Illinois where Wells Fargo and U. S. Bank are a party to foreclosures where “Fraud” and treason is apparent and not being properly investigated in the State of Illinois;

Finally, this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Federal Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Monzella Y. Johnson certify that on Dec. 24, 2024 I have caused proper service to be had on the Plaintiff and noted parties in the Certificate of Service via electronic/email delivery.

Attorney General Cook County States Attorney

Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov Eilene O’Neil Burke

555 West Monroe Suite 1300 statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov

Cook County Sheriff’s

Tom Dart

50 West Washington, Suite 702 email CCSO@ccsheriff.org

Chg. IL 60601

Dir. FBI, Hon Mayor Brandon

Special Agent in Charge (FBI) City Hall 7^th floor

Chicago, IL. 60601

2111 West Roosevelt Road

Chicago, Il 60608

President/CEO Rick Aneshansel US Bank Natl. Assoc. rick.aneshansel@usbank.com

Registered Agent: Grace A. Gorka US Bank Natl. Assoc.

190 S. LaSalle,

grace.gorka@usbank.com ggorka@usbank.com

Chg. IL 60603

JSC_General@atgf.com Pamela Murphy-Boylan President CEO of the (TJSC)

RPerdew@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm

simon.feng@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm

pmal@potestivolaw.com Potestivo Law Firm

chicagodocket@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm

Cook County Eviction Superintendent Colin.Luce@ccsheriff.org

CCSO Evictions CCSO.evictions@ccsheriff.org

ccc.chancerycalendar12@cookcountyil.gov Presiding Judge S. H. Hall

Potestivo & Ass., PC

Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal

ipleadings@potestivolaw.com

bthompson@potestivolaw.com

223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite 610
Chicago, IL. 60606

Cook County Clerk, Mariyana Spyropoulos

CCCWebsite@cookcountycourt.com

PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Dec. 24, 2024 A Notice of Appeal and Jurisdictional Statement has been filed in the Northern District of Illinois Federal Court.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

Frogishtwo65@gmail.com.

#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases

Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Friday, January 17, 2025

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

News about Mayor Lightfoot Calling Racism A Public Health Crisis June 17, 2021

About Me