PART 1, SEE HOW RACIST JUDGES IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND SOME REPUBLICANS DON'T RESPECT OR HONOR ANY BLACK PERSON'S AUTHORITY AND ONLY RECRUIT AND APPOINT INFERIOR BLAC OR BROWN JUDGES WHO WILL GO ALONG WITH ANY CRIMES PERPETRATED ON THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS AND CLOSING THEIR EYES TO ALL AREAS OF RACISM AND INJUSTICE SO AS NOT TO OFFEND OR UPSET THEIR POLITICAL MASSAS IN THE PARTY.
FORMER STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX, CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY CALVIN EVANS, GOVERNOR JB PRITZKER, JUDGE IRIS Y. CHIVIRA, COOK COUNTY SHERIFF TOM DART, STATE POLICE VIA EMAIL AND PRIORITY MAIL TO FRANCOISE, THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023).
THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT PARTICULARIZED HOW JUDGES IN THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT ILRB NOS L-CB-23-004, TRIED TO FIX AND COVER-UP CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OF THE STATE NOT RECEIVING ANY RECORDS FROM THE CTA IMPEACHING THE VERACITY OF MY COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST THE LABOR BOARD. JUDGE TERRANCE LAVINE IGNORED THE FOLLOWING LEGAL PRECEDENT AND DISMISSED MY COMPLAINT UNLWFULLY.
1.) 2022
IL App (4th) 200519, We will reverse the Board’s findings of fact only if they
are against the manifest weight of the evidence. Champaign-Urbana Public Health
District v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel, 354 Ill. App. 3d 482,
487 (2004). we will reverse the Board’s determination only if it is clearly
erroneous. SPEED District 802 v. Warning, 242 Ill. 2d 92, 112 (2011). To so
reverse, we must be convinced the Board committed a mistake.
The record on appeal is entirely
devoid of anything evidencing a Board investigation. The Board submits more
than once in its brief that the record contains the documents required by the
Illinois Supreme Court rules, implying that is the end of the inquiry. However,
it is not.
¶ 17 The Board must follow its own
rules, as those rules have force of law. Department of Central
Management Services/Illinois Commerce Comm'n v. Illinois Labor Relations Board,
State Panel, 406 Ill.App.3d 766, 771, 348 Ill. Dec. 226, 943
N.E.2d 1136 (2010). Further, the City rightfully insists the
Board comply with its
[202 N.E.3d 919]
own rules. Id. The problem facing us is
that, based on the record, we cannot determine if the Board conducted an
investigation such that we can review the Board's action.
¶ 18 For this reason, the Board, like any other administrative agency, is
obligated to create and provide a record sufficient to permit judicial review
of its decisions. Miles v. Housing Authority, 2015 IL App
(1st) 141292, ¶ 23, 395 Ill. Dec. 689, 39 N.E.3d 156.
We can hold the absence of a complete record against such an agency, even when
the agency is not the party appealing. Id. An administrative
body must not only provide the reviewing court with the entire record of
proceedings but also a record of the evidence the agency considered. Id. The
body must do so in order for the court to undertake judicial review. Id. As
in Miles, because of the state of the record, "our
ability to conduct a meaningful judicial review has been thwarted." Id. ¶
29. Given the Board's decision is subject to judicial review, it is appropriate
the Board provide an adequate record so that we can undertake our review. Id. ¶
24.
¶ 19 In matters such as this one, it is appropriate for a reviewing court to reverse and remand to the administrative agency to detail its findings supporting its conclusions. Soto v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners, 2013 IL App (2d) 120677, ¶ 32, 371 Ill. Dec. 181, 989 N.E.2d 1109. Our responsibility is to ensure the board acted in compliance with the appropriate "legal parameters," which we cannot do because there are no findings. Id. Among other inquiries, we need to determine whether the Board relied on improper factors when granting the petition. Id. ¶ 27.
2.) The record on it’s face does not have any
response from the CTA proving beyond the Preponderance of the Evidence
Plaintiff’s Pleadings are in fact of veracity and the CTA is relying on every
racist corrupt person involved to save them in the Cook County Criminal
Enterprise.
THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT PARTICULARIZED JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION INVOLVING JUDGE FREDRENNA LYLE TRYING TO FIX A FORECLOSURE CASE AREADY VACATED IN 2010 CASE 2008 CH 33616.
BECAUSE FREDRENNA LYLE DID A GREAT JOB HELPING RACIST BANK ATTORNEYS STEAL THE HOMES IN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES, SHE WAS PROMOTED TO THE APPELLATE COURT WHERE SHE CAN CONTINUE BEING A SELLOUT AND SERVANT TO HER MASSAS CONTROLLING HER IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
HER REPLACEMENT WAS ANOTHER INFERIOR BLACK MALE WORSE THAN HER WHO EXEMPLIFIED A HATE FOR BLACK WOMEN ESPECIALLY SENIOR CITIZENS AND IS HUGE IN TRINITY CHURCH WHERE REV MOSS IS THE PASTOR.
BANK ATTORNEYS NEVER FILED ANY APPEARANCES KNOWING THAT MANY OF THE BLACK JUDGES AIN'T SHIT AND WILL DO WHATEVER THEY ARE TOLD TO DO EMAILED THE JUDGE EXPARTE INSTRUCTED HIM ON HOW TO WRITE UP THE COURT ORDER SO THAT THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF CAN COME AND LOCK THEM OUT OF THEIR ORDER, HE RESPONDED BACK TO THE BANK ATTORNEY THROUGH HIS LAW CLERK COMPLYING WITH THEIR EVERY DEMAND, WHAT HE DOESN'T REALIZE IS THAT THE FBI HAS ALL OF THE EMAIL THREADS OF THAT COMMUNICATION.
ASSUMING ARGUENDO, THE FORECLOSURE WAS LEGIT (BUT IT WAS NOT) THE JUDGE WOULD DIRECT THE TENANTS OR HOMEOWNERS WOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE LAW CENTER FOR BETTER HOUSING, 100 N LA SALLE, ST #2500 CHICAGO, IL 60602, OR THE DIRECTOR TERESA HERRERA TO ASCERTAIN RENT RECEIPTS, IF THE RESPONDENT RECEIVED ANY 5 DAY NOTICE OR SERVED PERSONALLY SO AS TO PRESENT A PROPOSAL FOR MONIES FOR THEM FOR MOVING OUT OR CLEAN UP FEES ALLEGEDLY $10,500 PER PERSON IN THE RESIDENCE.
NEVER AT ANY TIME WAS THE CASE SENT TO EVICTIONS COURT BUT RELIED ON JUDGE JAMES T. DERICO TO VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SENIOR CITIZENS BY USING HIS SKIN COLOR TO ORDER THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF TO HAVE THEM TO ILLEGALLY EVICT THE SENIOR CITIZENS AND IT WAS DONE AS THEIR HOME WAS VICIOUSLY TRASHED AND RANSACKED AS THEIR PERSONAL EFFECTS OF 64 YEARS WAS STOLEN.
MOTION TO
VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA
MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE
POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR
POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).