HOW BLACK JUDGES AND CERTAIN HISPANICS ARE ALLEGEDLY RECRUITED INTO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO SELL OUT THEIR ETHNIC COMMUNITIES SUPPORTING RACISM AND CORRUPTION OF ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALISTS, KU KLUX KLAN ETC.
CONGRATULATIONS PRESIDENT ELECT DONALD TRUMP
READ HOW A JUDGE WHO OBVIOUSLY ACT OR THINK HE IS OF THE CAUCASIAN PERSUASION THE REAL RACIST KIND, IN FACT IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS THE WORSE JUDGES A BLACK OR BROWN PERSON COULD APPEAR BEFORE FOR JUSTICE ARE
1) A BLACK PERSON
2.) A POLISH AND MOST IRISH ETHNIC JUDGES
3.) CERTAIN HISPANICS IN MANY CASES CERTAIN MEXICANS WHO DON'T WANT TO BE SEEN AS MEXICANS AND WANT TO IDENTIFY ONLY WITH THE ANGLO-SAXON RACE ARE LIKENED TO THE BLACKS WHO HATE THEMSELVES AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO OPPRESS THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS.
4.) IN A SURPRISING TWIST MANY OF THE JUDGES WHO ARE NOW OF THE NON-HETEROSEXUAL UNION ARE THE WORSE AND LAST PERSON ANY HETEROSEXUAL PERSON OF COLOR EVER WANT TO APPEAR BEFORE AND IT SEEMS LIKE THE DEMOCRATS ONLY WANT THOSE TYPE OF JUDGES IN COOK COUNTY OR STATE AGENCIES.
5.) FOR THE MOST PART 30 AND 40 YEARS AGO JEWISH JUDGES WERE OF IMPECCABLE INTEGRITY AND BALANCED OUT THE RACISM OF THE IRISH OR POLISH ETHNIC JUDGES, WHEN MARY LANE MIKVA TRIED REFERRING A LAW FIRM OF JEWISH ATTORNEYS IT WAS AT THIS PLACE THEY EXPLAINED TO ME THAT "WHITE TRASH" RAN CITY HALL AND WAS THE REASON FOR MY WOES IN THE PATERNITY MATTER 88 D 079012.
COOK COUNTY DO NOT HAVE A ETHNIC GROUP OF A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY BALANCING OUT ANYTHING SO MANY OF THEM ARE UNQUALIFIED, RACIST, SEXIST AND WORSE THAN MANY OF THE WHITE JUDGES, I HAVE EVER APPEARED BEFORE.
EVERY RACIST JUDGE, I HAVE APPEARD BEFORE TOLD ME EVERYTHING ASSERTED IN MY PLEADINGS IS IN FACT TRUE BUT BECAUSE OF MY SKIN COLOR NO WHITE JUDGE OF IRISH, OR POLISH ETHNICITY WILL EVER RULE IN MY FAVOR AND AS FOR BLACK JUDGES YOU CAN FORGET IT YOUR BROS WILL NEVER EVER RULE IN YOUR FAVOR, THEY HAVE TO DO WHAT THEY ARE TOLD, BUT A GOOD WHITE PERSON WILL HELP AND RULE IN YOUR FAVOR.
TAKE A LOOK AT THIS CASE AN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE 16 YEARS OLD AND HOW BLACK JUDGES ARE ONLY SELECTED AND APPOINTED TO THE JUDICIARY OR CERTAIN POSITIONS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NOT BECAUSE OF THEIR ACADEMIC STANDING BUT THEIR SUBMISSIVE, DOCILE INFERIOR DISPOSITION.
READ FOR YOURSELF HOW THIS SCANDALOUS BLACK PERSON IS USING HIS ROBE AND UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY TO BULLY SENIOR CITIZENS FEMALES TRYING TO ILLEGALLY GET THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS TO EVICT THESE WOMEN FROM THEIR HOME, ALLEGEDLY US BANK PAID HIM VERY WELL.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION
U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)
Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of )
December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )
Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through ) Case # 2008 CH 33616
Certificates, Series 2006-NC3 )
Petitioner )
)
V. ) Judge James T. Derico
)
) Room 2804
)
Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella )
Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia ) Cal 56
Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration )
Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century )
Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson )
( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank; )
Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants, )
)
Respondents )
PETITION STRIKING/OBJECTING AND VACATING 2 COURT ORDERS (JUDGES ACTING AS DOMESTIC TERRORISTS) DUE TO IT BEING VOID/A NULLITY (NOV 15, 2024) AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF $30 MILLION DOLLARS & RECONSIDERATION 735 ILCS 5/2-1401 DUE TO JUDGE JAMES T DERICO OVERT PRIMA FACIE INVOLVEMENT WITH THE PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEYS WHO ADMITTED TO ALL PLEADINGS ON THE CONTESTED CALL (NOV 15, 2024) NEVER OBJECTED TO ANY OF THE PLEADINGS, NEVER FILED AN APPEARANCE BEFORE THE COURT AND THE COURT UNLAWFULLY “STRICKEN” THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ET AL AND IGNORED THE MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT CORROBOATING JUDGE LYLE VIOLATED CANON ETHICS, RICO ACTS, INVOLVEMENT IN A MORTGAGE FRAUD CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE BY HONORING THE DIRECTIVES OF A MEMBER OF THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF TO SIGN A COURT ORDER TO AUTHORIZE A UNLAWFUL LOCK OUT AND THE LAW FIRM BROKERED A COURT ORDER SUBORNATING PERJURY VIOLATING RPC ETHICS 3.3 WARRANTING A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL ATTORNEYS INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER AS DERICO USED HIS ROBE ILLEGALLY BY REFUSING TO DISQUALIFY HIMSELF FOR OVERT BIAS AND HATE AGAINST THE SENIOR CITIZEN WOMEN AS HIS TONE AND DEMEANOR FILLED WITH CONTEMPT BUT FAVORING THE PLAINTIFFS AND WHITE ATTORNEYS WITH A NOTICEABLE PREFERENCE ENTERED A COURT ORDER OCT 22, 2024 AS VOID/A NULLITY OF NO LEGAL STANDING & OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY HIM FOR CAUSE filed OCT 21, 2024 ALONG WITH VACATE OCT 16 EVICTION ORDER, IS BEING IGNORED DUE TO HIS PERSONAL HATE AND VENEMOUS RETALIATION AT THE SENIOR CITIZEN WOMEN OF AFRICAN AMERICAN DESCENT IS MAKING IT CLEAR DUE TO RESPONDENT’S SKIN COLOR AS A DEMOCRATIC JUDGE HE CAN DO WHATEVER HE WANTS BECAUSE OF THEIR AGE AND SKIN COLOR AND WILL NOT ADHERE TO ANY STATUTES OR LAWS PURSUANT TO 735 ILCS 5/9-117 EXPIRATION OF ORDER “EXPIRATION OF ORDER. NO EVICTION ORDER OBTAINED IN AN ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS ARTICLE MAY BE ENFORCED MORE THAN 120 DAYS AFTER THE ORDER IS ENTERED, UNLESS UPON MOTION BY THE PLAINTIFF THE COURT GRANTS AN EXTENSION OF THE PERIOD OF ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDER JUDGE DERICO AS A DE FACTO ATTORNEY FOR US BANK AND NOW RENEGADE “PRIVATE CITIZEN” IS TRYING TO INDUCE THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF TO VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 42 USC 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE, HIS OCT 22, 2024 DENIAL CORROBORATES AND DEMONSTRATES AS LONG AS HE IS WEARING A JUDICIAL ROBE HE WILL CONTINUE TO VIOLATE THE LAWS AND PROTECT OR UPHOLD EVERY CRIMINAL ACT OF US BANK OR ANY OF THEIR RACIST AFFILATES WARRANTING THE FBI, US ATTORNEY TO INVOKE JURISDICTION DUE TO THEIR ADMISSIONS, VIA AJITPAL SINGH, OF PHH MORTGAGE AND PROTECT ALL PLAINTIFFS ASSOCIATED IN THIS MATTER TRYING DILIGENTLY TO STEAL SAID HOME & IS ALLEGEDLY SEEKING THE SAME COMPENSATION, PROMOTION OR ELEVATION WITHIN THE COOK COUNTY JUDICIARY THE SAME WAY COOK COUNTY JUDGE (FREDRENNA LYLE) AFRICAN AMERICAN DID IN FALSIFYING ALL COURT ORDERS AND WAS PROMOTED TO THE APPELLATE COURT AS A REWARD FOR HER CRIMINAL COMPLICITY AND “PRIVATE CITIZEN” STATUS HELPING US BANK STEAL HOMES FROM SENIOR CITIZENS OR THOSE OF COLOR AS PARTICULARIZED PURSUANT TO FED RULE CIV P 8, 9, REQUIRE THAT PLAINTIFFS TO PARTICULARIZE THEIR ALLEGATIONS OF “FRAUD ON THE COURT” IN AS SHORT, PLAIN, AND DIRECT A WAY AS IS REASONABLE
1.) That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”
2.) JUDGE DERICO IS MAKING IT CLEAR TO THE FBI, STATE POLICE AND COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS as a judge even though the Sheriff don’t have jurisdiction to EVICT or LOCKOUT the DEFENDANTS LEGALLY PURSUANT TO THE APRIL 24, 2024 SHERIFF AFFIDAVIT BECAUSE NO ATTORNEY FILED A PETITON WITH THE CLERK OF COOK COUNTY LEGALLY TO EVICT, DUE TO THE MARCH 15, 2022 COURT ORDER IS NOT ONLY A FARCE BUT VOID IN ITS ENTIRETY.
A- Judge Derico is illustrating how he able to “FIX” the case and make ASSES out of members of Sheriffs Department and Induce Reliance on any person necessary proving he is able to do anything illegal wearing his robe and won’t a Dam thing happen to him because allegedly the racist brigade of fraternal terrorists is going to help him.
B- Judge Derico upon STRICKING or DENYING this PETITION IS INFORMING THE FBI AND MEMBERS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, that they are going to have to FORCIBLY REMOVE HIM FROM HIS POSITION INSTANTER.
3.) That to further amplify and demonstrate the duplicity of Judge Derico being in the Plaintiffs pocket doing whatever they instructed him to do, he signed two court orders identifying he was in the Law Division and not Chancery
4.) That on Nov 15, 2024, Respondent appeared on the Contested Call and Milica Z. Bilic appeared on the Call never Denied or Objected to any of the Pleadings.
5.) That because of Judge Derico’s Hate and Overt Resentment to the African American Senior Citizens is showing racist Caucasians, he is willing to do whatever he is directed to do to prove his loyalty to the alleged “TERRORIST CELL” stealing homes in the guise as foreclosure.
A- Furthermore, Judge Derico and so many judges like him is aware that Cook County and Illinois Legal system is racist and remarkably unjust against Black and Colored People acts as if he will not be admonished because his criminal actions are on Black women and not Caucasian litigants; therefore, as long as Blacks judges are stealing and Destroying Black and Brown people is how they are promoted or appointed in the judiciary.
6.) That Respondent asked the Judge, Before, I begin Your Honor, “I have a QUESTION TO ASK THE COURT,” for the record can you tell me when was the EVICTION ORDER of April 24, 2024 VACATED from the Sheriffs Department, authorizing an Eviction Order of Oct 16, 2024 = 5 months 22 Days totaling 175 Days?
7.) Judge Derico stated, “I don’t know” For judge Derico to be ignorant of this germane information and not question his Clerk to ascertain this information or the attorney in Court, who kept her mouth shut demonstrates the judge’s complicity in this “ORGANIZED MORTGAGE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY”
8.) Respondent, For the Record, as my sister is a RETIRED POLICE WOMAN when a suspect or assailant requests a SUPERVISOR out of RESPECT for their CIVIL RIGHTS, she had to Honor their requests and get a supervisor on the scene, but you have ignored us.
9.) Judge Derico with vicious “cocky” contempt and obvious resentment stated, “Didn’t I tell you that if you filed anything in this court, I was going to strike it?
10.) Respondent said, “we filed a Motion to Disqualify you,” Judge Derico’s reply, “was that you should have raised those issues on appeal because the Appellate Court is behind me or got my back on this” implying he could do and say whatever he desired because nothing was going to happen to him!
11.) Judge Derico’s disposition towards said Black woman was of VEXATIOUS CONTEMPT AND HATE, he had a better accommodating demeanor towards the Caucasian male attorneys than when he was talking to the Respondent, his mannerism is likened to the character in DJANGO UNCHAINED featuring Samuel L. Jackson as Stephen a perfect PLANTATION NEGRO willing to do anything his Plantation Master tells him to what to do.
A- Judge Derico has allegedly received an incredible kickback because said attorney Milica Z. Bilic, of Dykema Gossett PLLC, never filed an Appearance or Objected to anything Respondent articulated factually on the Contested Motion Call but a series of exparte emails to the judge and Cook County Sheriffs Eviction Superintendent unequivocally articulate complicity in a Criminal Enterprise of Mortgage Fraud Corruption.
B- The Superintendent of Evictions (Colin Luce) was in direct communication with said attorney and law firm in an unlawful manner thereby violating Respondent’s Civil Rights, hereto attached, Ex 1 Email Nov. 15, 2024, 12:51 from Attorney Milica Z. Bilic;
C- That Cook County Sheriff Superintendent unlawfully Emailed 11:53 am that “WE NEED SOMETHING QUASHING THE MOTION” I CAN’T MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT IT” Ex 2. The Superintendent was in GROSS ERROR He cannot authorized an EVICTION without first Vacating the April 24, 2024 Eviction Affidavit or a Court Order Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/9-117 EXPIRATION OF ORDER “EXPIRATION OF ORDER. NO EVICTION ORDER OBTAINED IN AN ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS ARTICLE MAY BE ENFORCED MORE THAN 120 DAYS AFTER THE ORDER IS ENTERED, UNLESS UPON MOTION BY THE PLAINTIFF THE COURT GRANTS AN EXTENSION OF THE PERIOD OF ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDER.
D- That on the bottom of Ex 3 Lenka Fuhrmann, Senior Paralegal of MDK, in Columbus, Ohio, Emailed 11:38 am to Cook County Sheriffs, Superintendent of Evictions, “I just want to let you know that there will not be an order so there is no delay in getting the lock out scheduled”.
E- That the Email Ex 3 at the Bottom of the page, “I spoke with Judge Derico about the proposed order and he was unsure whether he had the power to direct the Sheriff to disregard future filings from the Defendants so he asked me to take that language out”. He has signed the attached order, Ex 4.
F- Judge Derico allegedly authorized and initiated an unlawful Court Order that is warranting the Confusion and Eviction Officers in Cook County to now be involved because no Attorney is on record seeking any Evictions by way of filing any Motions before the Clerk of the Circuit Court.
12.) That attention all Law Enforcement Personnel, FBI, State Police and Cook County Sheriffs JUDGE FREDREENNA LYLE ALLEGELDY RECEIVED A LARGE FINANCIAL KICKBACK FROM US BANK, See the Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Report of Sale(Court Order Being Void/A Nullity) And Distribution, Confirming Sale and Eviction Order, and For A Personal Deficiency Judgment, Order Finding Personal Deficiency Due to Judge Lyle & Other Attorneys/Judges Complicit in a Criminal Enterprise of Mortgage Fraud Affidavit of PHH Mortgage Corp. Corroborating their Involvement Stealing Home Warranting A Rule to Show Cause Remanding All Parties Instanter Into Custody w/Body Attachment & Disqualifying Judge Lyle Instanter (filed April 25, 2022)
A- That Par F, Page 3 of the aforementioned Motion, states “Page 1 of the March 15, 2022 court order, “That all notices required by 735 ILCS 5/15-1507 (C) were given is a “LIE” Defendant received the Order Friday April 22, 2022 said envelope from Potestivo & Associates envelope reflects it was mailed April 20, 2022 from Rochester Michigan”,
B- That Par G, Page 3 of the order states, The Movant shall mail a copy of this Order within 7 days to the last known address of the Mortgagor. Order was not received until 31 days from the 7 days on which was stated on the court order, “Private Citizen” Lyle acted like the THUGS from her neighborhood where she was the Alderman et al.
13.) That Ex 5 is the BRIEFING SCHEDULE ORDER that “Private Citizen? Lyle signed INDUCING RELIANCE on everyone because not only is the Court Order VOID/ A NULLITY but she never had a Briefing on any of the Motions Respondent filed demonstrating she never had jurisdiction and that they were victims of Mortgage Fraud
A- That the aforementioned Court Order undeniably demonstrate what certain Black judges are willing to do SELLING OUT THEIR ETHNIC GROUPS becoming a need Breed of DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.
B- That said Court Order is VOID/A NULLITY, as Lyle used her unlawful judicial authority stringing the Respondents along giving them the impression, they were going to have a judicial hearing on the merits of said Pleadings.
14.) That said law firm Manley Deas Kochaiski, LLC, from Columbus Ohio was aware of all TERRORISTS ACTS and MORTGAGE FRAUD CONSPIRACIES, hereto attached Gr Ex 6 , Nov 15, 2023 Notice of Response for Demand for Possession of Property and Requests Proof and Receipt of Property Allegedly Sold that does not belong to anyone we have not Sold Our Property to Anyone, as it was faxed with confirmation and to this day never acknowledged.
15.) That the reasons NO ATTORNEY is appearing before the Court legally is because all of them know that, they would be REMANDED INTO CUSTODY INSTANTER for their involvement in this Mortgage Fraud Criminal Conspiracy, that said Court Order 1.) Order Approving Report of Sale March 15, 2022.
A- JUDGE LYLE USED HER ROBE IN A CRIMINAL MANNER and became a DOMESTIC TERRORIST and Judge Derico has now become an alleged member of the same terrorist cell using his alleged skin color, sexuality or both supporting RACISM, TERRORISM AND CORRUPTION TRYING TO STEAL RESPONDENTS HOME.
B- Black or certain Hispanic judges either of the alleged Homosexual/Lesbian fraternal groups of the Democratic Party are now embracing or supporting the Ku Klux Klan by upholding every Terrorist Act outlawed by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant in 1871.
See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,
“Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynchings and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
16.) That todays Inferior Black or Brown Judges have become Domestic Terrorists using their skin Color or Sexuality, unlike the Ku Klux Klan but the end result was the same, Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
A- That all Plaintiffs and judges thought they were bullying the Pro Se litigants when in fact they were REBELLING AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.
17.) That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
18.) Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;
19.) The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
20.) Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
a. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. —U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues. -Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality. -Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
21.) That Plaintiff’s was supposed to Petition or Motion the Court due to EVICTION ORDER EXPIRING Pursuant to ILCS 5/9-117 no attorneys are going follow this procedure because they all know that they can be REMANDED into Custody Instanter committing FRAUD ON THE COURT, that is why they are allegedly relying on Inferior or Black Judges who will allegedly violate any laws against their ethnic groups if the price is right as demonstrated in this matter.
22.) The Cook County Sheriff’s CANCELED the Eviction 4/24/2024, Ex A.
23.) That on Oct. 16, 2024 Respondent received a FINAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT to have Respondents who are senior citizens illegally EVICTED FROM THEIR HOME, Ex B.
24.) That in reply to PHH, Oct 9, 2024 Gr Ex C, Par 3, said contract with New Century Mortgage was VACATED by a Cook County Judge, See Gr Ex D, Oct. 13, 2024, Dir Rohit Chopra of CFPB who received said Priority Communication, 10/18/2024.
25.) Potestivo & Associates received said Communication Oct 15, 2024 at 11:33 am via email, Ex E, the NEXT Day COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS mailed out EX A, said Plaintiffs are trying to cover -up their ILLEGAL INVOLVEMENTS IN THIS MORTGAGE FRAUD CONSPIRACY.
FACTS: That as owners we have no knowledge as to who the aforementioned mortgage company is never signed any agreement, never communicated with any person of this company;
a. That the signed Court Order as of June 2, 2010, by Cook County Judge Gillespie “THIS COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VACATES THE JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE FOR LACK OF A PROPER AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT”
The Affidavit that the Appellees presented to the Court of Cook County was an AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
26.) In reply to Par 4, PHH Mortgage Services et al. It is FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED in its entirety, they have illegally used our identity to advance their criminal agenda in having a Black judge who are allegedly easy to use and purchase to sign a court order on a case that was not only Vacated but AFFIRMED by the Appellate Court and in addition New Century Filed Bankruptcy April 3, 2007, hereto attached, CNN Money article.
FACTS
a. That the Appellate Court AFFIRMED, Judge Gillespie’s Ruling “That Defendant filed an Appeal with due-diligence trying emphatically to save their family home and was before another group of judges and the APPELLATE COURT- AFFIRMED (Dec 30, 2011) Judge Gillespie’s Court Order, Judges Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., Joseph Gordon, James R. Epstein”.
27.) FACTS In reply to Par 4, New Century did reflect an alleged amount of $420,000,00 but the judge Fredrenna Lyle signed a Court Order for $868,881.58 May 5, 2021 illegally.
28.) FACTS US Bank had lawyers from Potestivo Law firm orchestrate the falsification and misrepresentations of all documents in these illegal transactions.
29.) FACTS Every document you presented corroborates PHH Mortgage Services are complicit in a Criminal Enterprise stealing homes.
30.) Finally, in your documents Page 66, 67 of the PDF, The Judicial Sales (filed in the Recorder of Deeds with Karen Yarborough) Pamela Murphy-Boylan, President CEO of the Judicial Sales states that the property was sold Nov 21, 2021 for ZERO MONEY with no CITY or REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAXES, and Deed to Property was illegally Transferred and a Notary illegally attesting to crimes, due to a plethora of operatives engaging in a sophisticated Mortgage Fraud Scheme that has now been CORROBORATED AND ADMITTED TO BY PHH REPRESENTATIVES WITH THEIR INVALID DOCUMENTS.
31.) In replying to Page 2 Par 1, YOU HAVE NO CONTRACT, NO AGREEMENT AND NO FORECLOSURE SALE, THE WHOLE TRANSACTION IS FRAUDLULENT COMPRISED OF A PLETHORA OF CRIMINAL ELEMENTS AND ALTISOURCE HAD SOMEONE TO BREAK IN OUR HOME ONCE AND CHANGED OUR LOCKS LOCKING US OUT OF OUR HOUSE AND KEEPS TRESPASSING BY PLACING DOCUMENTS ON OUR PROPERTY AS SENIOR CITIZENS AND FED UP AND AS A RETIRED POLICE OFFICER, IT APPEARS NOBODY IS GOING TO BE SATISFIED UNTIL SOMEBODY IS IN A BODY BAG.
32.) My question what is the price rate buying Cook County judge or any judge seeing that so many Black Democrats are filled with graft for money?
IT APPEARS THE DEMOCRATS HAVE A SOPHISTICATED WAY OF STEALING HOMES AND IT IS BEING COVERED-UP BY DEMOCRATIC JUDGES.
A- US Bank never responded nor did PHH Mortgage Services ever addressed any of the Complaints or Responses explaining how they have any documents showing a contract was had with them when a contract was never signed.
B- A Certified Letter was sent to PHH Mortgage via email hereto attached to all of the attorneys of record and nobody DENIED or OBJECTED to any of the statements of VERACITY.
C- The Recorder of Deeds have in their records that this matter has been VACATED and AFFIRMED by the Appellate Court by Judges Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., Joseph Gordon, James R. Epstein. Dec 30, 2011.
D- PHH states that there was a DELINQUENCY on this account on February 10, 2009---We never ever had any contract with this Mortgage Company and was not in FORECLOSURE with any BANK and is requesting that they produce all documents verifying this allegation because it appears to be a crime of identity theft;
E- Allegedly, if PHH have any documents of my signature on any contract saying we are in FORECLOSURE, I am filing a Complaint with the FBI and all additional law enforcement agencies, due to this being FRAUD.
F- Hereto attached, April 1, 2022, Email Acknowledgement/Admission of Mortgage Fraud to PHH and all of its attorneys nobody has DENIED, OBJECTED or RESPONDED to the FACTUAL ASSERTIONS PARTICULARIZED through the document; thereby admitting to all pleadings in the affidavit.
1.) That Judge Lyle never had jurisdiction and violated the very laws violating her Oath “ENGAGED IN TREASON OFFENSES, (MAY 5, 2021) ENTERED AN ORDER 2 YEARS SEVEN MONTHS LATER TO U.S. BANK from her other Order Vacating;
2.) Judge Robert Adrian, a veteran judge in downstate Quincy, Illinois, faced removal from the bench due to his controversial actions. In 2022, he reversed a guilty ruling against a young man in a sexual assault case. The Illinois Courts Commission issued a rare decision, stating that Adrian attempted to circumvent the state’s mandatory minimum sentencing law during a sentencing hearing for Drew Clinton, who was previously found guilty of sexually assaulting 16-year-old Cameron Vaughan at a 2021 graduation party. Adrian justified his reversal by claiming that the Adams County prosecutor had “totally failed” to prove Clinton’s guilt, but the commission saw this as a subterfuge. They concluded that the judge intentionally circumvented the law to satisfy his personal belief about a just sentence, resulting in the reversal of the criminal defendant’s conviction1.
a. Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
b. “A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d 227-232
c. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
1.) That all parties acted as “PRIVATE CITIZENS” and engaged in numerous “TREASON OFFENSES”, “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” as Judge Lyle aided and abetted in numerous crimes using her robe trying to help said Plaintiffs
Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million Jury Verdict Against City in Shooting Incident
Wednesday, February 24, 2021 Julie Tappendorf
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7 million in damages relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.
According to the court opinion, the plaintiff claimed that a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an argument when the two had been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain and other injuries. The friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the shooting, arguing that the City was responsible for the officer's conduct. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that the City's failure to have an "early warning system" to identify officers who might engage in misconduct, failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers who engage in misconduct, and the "code of silence" among police officers contributed to the shooting incident. The City argued that the officer was off duty and not acting under "color of state law" at the time of the shooting, so the City was not liable under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. The case made its way to a jury which found the City of Chicago liable and awarded $44.7 million in damages to the plaintiff. The jury found that two of the City's policies - its failure to maintain an adequate early warning system and failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers - caused the officer to shoot his friend.
The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer. The Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's federal rights were violated, the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict against the City of Chicago.
A- Judge Lyle set the hearing date for August 3rd at 11:00am, hereto attached Ex A.
b. That upon judge Lyle receiving the aforementioned documents (July 19, 2022) that corroborated her role explicitly engaging in criminal acts signing illegal court orders for the law firm of Potestivo & Associates trying to help them steal the Respondent’s home, she struck the court date.
c. Judge Lyle became a law unto herself and entered and Order July 20, 2022, striking the August 3, 2022 court date and continued the matter to August 5, 2022.
d. Jim Crow Laws are being managed and instituted by the Black Gate Keepers within the Democratic Party many of the alleged Black leaders are mere figureheads enforcing the same hate and discriminatory doctrines of the fraternal hate organization, that which many of the Blacks and certain Brown persons have accepted being Inferior to Anglo-Saxons doing whatever they are told by keeping their mouths shut, keeping their eyes closed to any crimes perpetrated by certain Caucasians and ears deaf to any person of color complaining about any aspect of injustices and in this case Lyle is making sure said women being First Responders, senior citizens retired Civil Servants, Police Officer and Educator from the Chicago Board of Education not receive any avenue of justice forsaking her own career protecting corrupt Anglo-Saxons. .
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays for the Relief
1. For an Order Granting the Petition in it’s entirety Instanter for the Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon the Laws and Perjury in this Terrorist Mortgage Fraud Criminal Conspiracy.
2. For an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of this matter;
3. For an Order issuing a Mandatory Injunction on the Enforcement of all Foreclosures Prohibit the Evictions of any persons until a Special Prosecutor is appointed to investigate all parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise.
A- That said Attorneys Law Firms and Judges be referred for Law Licenses be REVOKED INSTANTER for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and brought before the Grand Jury for additional Charges.
4. For an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all Attorneys, Clerks and State employees involved in this matter;
5. For the entry of an Order awarding to your Respondent for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com
