PRESIDENT TRUMP HOW DO AN INNOCENT FREEMAN RECEIVE JUSTICE UNDER YOUR ADMINISTRATION? JIM CROW LAWS OUTLAWED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ARE STILL BEING ENFORCED AND COVERED UP IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
1.) Retired Senior Citizens Police Officer and her sister Retired Chicago Public School Teacher were unlawfully evicted from their home (2 days before Thanksgiving 2024) of 65 years in an illegal foreclosure matter on a case dismissed in 2010.
A- a.
That the
signed Court Order as of June 2, 2010, by Cook County Judge Gillespie “THIS
COURT ON IT’S OWN MOTION VACATES THE JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE FOR LACK OF A
PROPER AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT”
The Affidavit that the Appellees presented to the Court of Cook County was an AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2.) In reply to Par 4, It is FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED in its entirety, they have illegally used our identity to advance their criminal agenda in having a Black judge who are allegedly easy to use and purchase to sign a court order on a case that was not only Vacated but AFFIRMED by the Appellate Court and in addition New Century Filed Bankruptcy April 3, 2007, hereto attached, CNN Money article.
FACTS
a.
That the Appellate Court AFFIRMED, Judge
Gillespie’s Ruling “That Defendant filed an Appeal with due-diligence trying
emphatically to save their family home and was before another group of judges
and the APPELLATE COURT- AFFIRMED Judge Gillespie’s Court Order, hereto
attached, Gr Ex B August 30, 2012, Judges Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr.,
Joseph Gordon, James R. Epstein”.
BLACK AND CERTAIN BROWN DEMOCRATS ARE PROMOTED AND APPOINTED
BASED ON THEIR SUCCESS DESTROYING THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS.
3.) 1.) JUDGE FORTI SIGNED A COURT ORDER MAY 9, 2025, ON A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE: COURT FINDS A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF INDIRECT CIVIL CONTEMPT….FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE CHILD REPRESENTATIVE’S RETAINER, CONTINUED TO AUG 25, 2025.
4.) That on Monday May 19, 2025, Respondent’s daughter was removed
from her custody in the State of Indiana where she fled for her safety and
has NEVER BEEN UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF COOK COUNTY ONCE JUDGE DAVID E. HARACZ
SIGNED THE VOID COURT ORDER OF NOV. 4, 2021.
5.) THERE IS NO JUSTICE IN COOK COUNTY FOR INNOCENT LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS AND WHAT EVERY DEMOCRAT IS WILLING TO DO TO KEEP THEIR CITIZENS OPPRESSED AND DISENFRANCHISED FROM SOCIETY BUT IS WILLING TO BLAME PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR ICE'S ENFORCEMENT ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, BUT ALL ARE WILLING TO ACCEPT THE UNLAWFUL AND DISPARATE CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ON THE CITIZENS OF CHICAGO.
Trump slams Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker: ‘Probably the worst in the country’
• 2d •
2 min read
New! Summarize with Copilot
Let Copilot break it down—see the key takeaways in seconds.
Wed, Jun 18 at 10:26 AM
Attention Hon Patricia Fallon:
As per my conversation with Madam Estefania Dominguez who happens to be Judge Powers Coordinator and is not your Coordinator professionally explained to me that you did not have a phone number or Clerk or Coordinator and provided me your email to direct any concerns.
I have been due-diligently trying to contact you which seems next to impossible because if you are having Zoom Hearings how can they be heard and a court reporter know how to call in?
As you may not be aware Judge Forti has been the alleged master mind of this entire criminal conspiracy involving your prior colleague Kent Stephen Ray, with judge Ronald Bartkowicz issuing an unlawful warrant against me where former judge David Haracz and Timothy P. Murphy had me Remanded into Custody totaling 5 times for allegedly owing child support on Francoise's daughter who was an emancipated adult.
The FBI had proof that the CTA and Paternity matter were connected they needed corroboration of another company being complicit that would be corroboration well thanks to Judge Forti he finally helped established the area of clarity that had everyone truly baffled, however, Judge Forti got the attention of Law Enforcement and it was learned he was also involved with allegedly "FIXING" a case where Caucasian Realtors ascertained section 8 units for me in the River north and Greek Town communities with my voucher 9727767 my credit score was 716 provided a deposit they accepted me but when they learned of my skin color they refused to let me move in and kept my deposits and a surprising Chancery matter 2008 Ch 33616 where alleged homosexual judge Derico demonstrated his hatred to senior citizens and unlawfully authorized the Sheriffs to evict them from their home in an illegal foreclosure.
Judge Forti was not appointed to become a judge until September 2016, he and his alleged lover Kent Stephen Ray who was allegedly intimate with the Secretary of ATU 241 as they tried destroying my personnel files as Ken allegedly engineered how the records were to be tampered with or destroyed, they have deleted my starting dates salaries from the database but my retirement date is still intact.
If I present that information they may destroy the whole system, Judge Forti and everyone who stands with him fraternally is seeking your support to continue the racism and systemic hate and violations on any and all Black or Brown men or women not Homosexual or of their ethnicity in denying any claims we put before the Cook County Courts, he has used his position and judicial robe to incite terrorism genocide in destroying any mother or man that he does not like just read the case involving Ms. Taylor how her daughter was kidnapped and removed from her custody or how a retired Policewoman and her sister was evicted from their home of 65 years unlawfully off of void court orders.
You and everyone else reading this email need to see just how low down and racist these individuals are and I willing to bet you not one of them is competent enough to identify any undercover operatives.
I have humbly defeated every attorney that the Political Machine deployed at me because Kent Stephen Ray could not handle me years ago with certain racist in the closet Caucasian judges, but out of respect for the judge's order, he directed me to go back to my union and let them handle my reinstatement, I complied but still these sick homosexuals and racist judges are still trying to destroy me for being a MASCULINE HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN it appears something they are not used to dealing with especially if no sexual or other favors are allegedly involved.
Respectfully submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
CHICAGO IS RACIST AND SEGREGATED BECAUSE MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL NEEDS THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE AND #BLACKANDBROWNLIVESDONTMATTER.
RAHM WILL SAY ANYTHING NECESSARY JUST TO GET RE ELECTED SHUTTING DOWN THE CAMERAS IN PREDOMINANTLY BLACK AND BROWN AREAS IS SUPPOSED TO APPEASE THOSE PERSONS.
THE REALITY IS THAT HIS ADMINISTRATION CONDONES RACIAL TERRORISM AND JIM CROW APPLICATION OF THE LAWS.
SEE HOW THE MARCH 11, 2015 POST PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE RELATES TO THIS DOCUMENT.
Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama
2601 Richard J. Daley Center
Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mar. 13, 2015
Case# 15 CH 01670
Room 2305
COURTESY COPY
A MUST READ
Honorable Judge Valderrama:
Please Find Plaintiff’s
PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE DUE TO CORROBBORATION of FRAUD PERJURY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RETALIATION ON COMPLAINANT REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER
w/Affidavit with the attachments demonstrating heinous criminal acts likened to war crimes.
Special Note: Please be advised the number of attorneys engaging in criminal acts upholding Perjury and “fraud”.
In the event court file is missing or destroyed: Sheriff #01712556 CHA; #01712557 City of Chicago, #01712558 345 East Ohio, #01712560 K2
Because of the “Hue” of your skin these attorneys seems to feel they don’t have to respect you or the laws and has demonstrated this in their testimonies not being served and going along with various acts of Criminal Acts of Terrorism Discrimination in housing and a plethora of other Civil Rights Violations.
Because certain attorneys with political clout with certain unnamed City Hall officials have demonstrated “Above the Law” antics and is quite “Brazen”
Cook County Sheriff Sergeant Bradford, tried retrieving the above case number up case not found, but was able to ascertain information from the Sheriff # 01712528 for example, Plaintiff was not able to retrieve case either computer says case not found!
Somebody destroyed Exhibits J, K, and L and other related documents showing service on the Defendant’s.
Because many of the parties involved are not able to “Lynch” the Plaintiff with a physical rope “Lynching” is executed in an updated manner on an innocent man simply for standing up to Racism, Racial Segregation and Racial Injustice in Chicago and how many closed their eyes to the crimes because Black and Brown lives don’t matter living in Chicago.
Court Call Mar. 20, 2015 @ 9:30 am
Let this communication receive you and your family in good health
Respectfully Submitted,
________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
Counsel Pro Se
(312) 927-4210
CC. Chief Judge Timothy Evans Courtesy Copy U.S. Atty. Zachary T. Fardon, Judge Mary Mikva, Gordon & Rees, Cary & Schiff & Assc., Seyfarth & Shaw, CHA, Maria Sewell Joseph, Gov. Bruce Rauner, Mayor Rahm Emmanuel ---See Certificate of Service of other names.
Presiding Judge Moshe Jacobius, Asst. Gen Counsel, Sec. of State Terrence McConville, City of Chg Commission on Human Relations, States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown
Robert J. Holley, FBI Agent Chicago Courtesy Copy
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
In Re Racial Discrimination/Source Income Violations
Housing Matters:
Joe Louis Lawrence Case # 2015 CH 01670
Appellant HON. F. U. Valderrama
Room 2305
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations, K2 Apartments
Respondents
. AMENDED
REQUEST FOR REVIEW/APPEAL/RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR “FRAUD” “CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “CONTEMPT OF COURT” PERJURY & “CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY/COVER-UP CONSPIRACY” “CORRUPTION” OTHER IRREGULARITIES & IMPOSE SANCTIONS WITH AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Appellant Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Request for Review/Appeal/Rule to Show Cause for “Fraud” “Contempt of Court” “Perjury” “Criminal Conspiracy”/ “Cover-up Conspiracy” “Corruption” other Irregularities & Impose Sanctions with Affidavit, pursuant to the provisions of the Admin. Rev. Law, 735 ILCS 5/3-101 pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;
Be advised the Commission has committed “Fraud” of many sorts engaged in a Heinous Civil Rights Conspiracy enacting “Jim Crow Laws” outlawed by the United Supreme Court by covering up and ignoring the various criminal acts by members of the Democratic Political Machine.
That Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed—there was never any signatures or seals recorded from the mailed documents! Causing the documents to be VOID in authority!
Respectfully Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se/Appellant
P.O. Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
312 927-4210
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Twitter @joelouis7
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:
1.) That said identified person operating in disguise as an alleged Commissioner for the Chicago Commission on Human Relations used his position and unlawful authority to uphold “Jim Crow Laws” of said Confederate applications to unlawfully dismiss said Complaint filed by the City of Chicago;
2.) Said records unequivocally demonstrate CHA colluding with Respondents in opportunity areas making sure he did not move into certain areas due to his skin color and the Commission having knowledge of this falsified documents upholding racism racial discrimination and a plethora of Civil Rights Violations in Housing and other acts of “FRAUD”, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, B, C, D and E Orders from the Commission violating Supreme Court Rule 272 where a signature is required and mail fraud Inducing Reliance on all parties;
A- That Gr. Ex A Order Denying Request for Review, in favor of Respondent 420 East Ohio with no signature or seal; (Jan. 6, 2015)
B- That Gr. Ex B Order Denying Request for Review, in favor of Respondent CHA and The Streeter 355 East Ohio with no signature or seal;(Jan. 6, 2015)
C- That the Respondent City of Chicago ignored Gr Ex F Motion for Reconsideration et al w/Affidavit;(Dec. 8, 2014)
D- That Gr. Ex C Order Finding No Substantial Evidence, in favor of Respondent 420 East Ohio with no signature or seal; (Dec. 2015)
E- That Gr. Ex D Investigative Order against Appellant seeking documents with no signature or seal;(Dec 29, 2014)
F- That Gr. Ex E Order to Respond and Notice of Potential Default with no signature or seal; (Jan. 5, 2015)
3.) That Appellant filed Gr. Ex’s G, H, I and M
A- That Gr. Ex G Motion Objecting Extension of Time w/Affidavit before the Respondent City of Chicago went ignored by all parties due to the veracity stated within;
B- That Gr. Ex H Motion Moving for a Default w/Affidavit (Jan. 22, 2015) this said document went ignored by all parties, due to the veracity stated within;
C- That Appellant complying with the clerks directive, Gr Ex I recorded the names and certified numbers for all defendant’s for proper service via United States Postal delivery;
D- That Gr. Ex M Appellant filed a Motion to Cure Defects in Investigative Order Due to Error or Fraud w/Affidavit, nobody denied or objected to the Motion;
E- That defendant’s attorneys from the CHA and 345 East Ohio with contemptuous vexation for the laws committed PERJURY told the judge “they were never served”! Allegedly a city attorney stood in the background observing took a picture of the court order with their cell phone;
F- That Gr. Ex J, Frank Fiorentino signed for 345 East Ohio;
G- That Gr. Ex K, Jeffrey Wilson, signed for Chicago Commission on Human Relations;
H- That Gr. Ex L, C. Armstrong signed for the CHA;
4.) That the Honorable Franklin Ulysses Valderrama had jurisdiction over the parties when they were properly before the court demonstrated the level of Racial Disrespect towards the judge as perpetrated at the Appellant;
A- That Appellant honestly in error failed to attach the court orders from the Commission on Human Relations, but deliberately failed to seek the service on all parties involved so as to demonstrate to this court, the racist animosity of the mindset of the parties involved, in that whether they are in court before this Honorable Court or Appellant is presenting perfected legal documents the hue of our skin tone still to this day (year 2015) yields the diabolical heinous acts of what white men are willing to do to undermine the integrity of an innocent man prohibiting him and family equal access to housing or the laws and in the judge’s case no respect because you are in a robe!
5.) That Anne D. Harris referenced the Appellant’s documents as “Jibberish” but admitted she was in fact served certified mail by the clerk of the Circuit Court;
6.) That Respondents CHA maliciously with vexatious contempt for the laws incited racist policies made perjured admissions to the Commission on Human Relations and court.
A- In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
B- Appellant filed a Motion for Reconsideration Vacate Order Due To “Fraud” Terrorist Conspiracy Acts Civil Rights Violations Impose Sanctions w/Affidavit (Dec. 8, 2014);
C- That a City employee in the Commission on Human Relations falsified a document purported as an Order from the authority of the Commissioner absent a signature or seal titled “Request for Review” denying said Motion Jan. 6, 2015;
D- Appellant filed a “Request for Review” Impose Sanctions w/Affidavit March 28, 2014, that a City employee in the Commission on Human Relations falsified a document purported as an Order from the authority of the Commissioner absent a signature or seal titled “Request for Review” denying said document Jan. 6, 2015;
2.) That Appellant legally with astute integrity filed an “Emergency Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al., w/Affidavit (March 14, 2014), totaling 157 pages served on all parties as well as Hon. Rahm Emmanuel (Mayor) via personal service, said Complaint was expeditiously dismissed unlawfully (March 18, 2014) ignoring all of the corroborating facts of all parties involved, hereto attached, Gr Ex F, Motion for Reconsideration et al; Because of Appellant’s ethnicity Rahm Emmanuel closed his eyes to the Racist Heinous Acts perpetrated by the Political Machine.
A- "The mayor of Chicago is the mayor of Chicago land," Myron Orfield says. Orfield, who used to live here, has been a leading force for desegregation in the Twin Cities—he's the executive director of the Institute on Race & Poverty at the University of Minnesota. He says a Chicago mayor carries much clout with suburban mayors, and could use it to help ease segregation in the city and the near suburbs.
B- Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied, there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.
C- Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
3.) That because the Democratic Political Machine is likened to the Ku Klux Klan Page 3, 4 of Gr Ex F demonstrate the racial hatred “Powerful Whites” in authority have against persons of color and the degree of “Hate Crimes they are willing to exhaust making sure a person of color remain oppressed;
A- A- That there has not been a single person to stand up against the Racist Atrocities lodged at the Complainant in every layer of this conspiracy ILL. App. (1st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.
B- U.S 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.-U.S. v. Jimenez Recio; 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154, L. Ed.2d 744, on remand 371 F.3d 1093;
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;
C Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).
4.) That because Brown, Black and some foreigners lives don’t matter this is the consensus of Democrats in the Political Machine to maintain job security keeping their ethnicity employed as demonstrated in this matter how top attorneys are earning income at the demise and Racial Torture of an innocent man standing up to them in a “Homeless State” is how The Chicago Commission on Human Relations erred in ignoring all of Appellant’s affidavits never challenged or objected to, (1995), Stokes v. Bullins, 844 F. 2d 269, 275 (5th Cir. 1988), Wassum v. City of Bellaire, Texas, 861 F. 2d 453, 456 (5th Cir. 1988), Benavides v. County of Wilson, 955 F. 2d 968, 972 (5th Cir.) cert. denied,__ U.S.__, 113 S.Ct. 79, 121 L. Ed. 2d 43 (1992), “Liability will accrue for the acts of a municipal official when the official possess “final policymaking authority” to establish municipal policy with respect to the conduct that resulted in a violation of constitutional rights. Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S. Ct. 1292, 1300, 89 L.Ed. 2d 452 (1986) (plurality opinion),Smith v. Wade U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct.1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)
C - Vigus v. O’Bannon, 1886 N.E. 788, 118 Ill. 334; Hazelton v. Carolus, 1907 132 Ill. App. 512; Carter v. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1983, The Supreme court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “(fraud and deceit)”are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance……………
D- Beatie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 189 WL 2373 (1st Dist.1989). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 332 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E. 2d 590, (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N. E. 2d 895 (1st Dist. 1939).
E- Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).
5.) How can any person whether they are Irish or of Polish ethnicity be the majority in control, see wrong, ignore wrong, close their ears and eyes to wrong when a person of their ethnic group commits fraudulent acts?
6.) How can any Judge whether they be Asian, Mexican or African American etc., who are a minority on the bench or in a Commission go up against a majority in control especially if that lawyer or law firm is of the majority’s ethnic make-up or part of the Terrorist Order and rule against that lawyer and not expect some type of repercussion from those in control?
7.) That said document that was mailed by the unnamed Commissioner had as much value to it as yesterday’s toilet paper where said paper is heavily needed from those suffering from Crohn’s Disease involved in these matters;
8.) Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,
“Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;
9.) FACT: CHA had agreed to pay rent for the Appellant via the Mobility program at 420 East Ohio but the Respondent did not want him and family in the building and used falsified credit scores of Appellant and children credit scores only after his identity was compromised and stolen where CHA officials were involved to deny him access to renting the unit;
A- That said documents tendered with the filing of the March 14, Amended Emergency Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al clearly and unequivocally demonstrate Complainant’s credit score at 670, despite credit report hacked and falsified;
Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981
Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.
That because of the number of years Appellant have been harmed by said Civil Rights Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before this tribunal, Complainant is seeking $25 Million from the inception of this matter, until this matter is finally adjudicated and for the heinous Racial Hate acts associated in these matters causing some of his children to be hospitalized for various psychological traumas where therapy was necessary but said medical information was used unlawfully in an attempt to destroy Appellant;
Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”
Finally, this document is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
Most recently stated in Federal Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Appellant/Counsel Pro Se
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Complainant respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.) For an Order Remanding all CHA & related Respondents Section 8 employees who had knowledge and closed their eyes to said injustices or persons in authority absorb any and all related expenses costs relating to Appellant vacating home which was an abandoned building CHA paid an illegal person money who never owned the property and Judge Scully was involved as an attorney and Judge Leonard Murray had Sheriff to break into home locking Appellant out 10058 South Vernon Instanter and being homeless, and has no income and is on welfare receiving FOOD STAMPS only due to said parties RETALIATING and OPPRESSING him and family EXHAUSTING TERRORISTS TACTICS PLACING HIM IN THAT STATE;
Pursuant to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that because of the noted depraved acts of all parties pay punitive damages, of $30 Million Dollars Appellant and family has endured in these matters;
2.) For an Order Recommending a Special Prosecutor outside of States Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s jurisdiction due to the political influence involved and them ignoring the criminal acts perpetrated by “Powerful” White Men in authority;
3.) For an Order REVERSING the Commission’s order for failing to follow Supreme Court rules and procedures;
4.) For an Order Imposing Sanctions Fining CHA and all attorneys and law firms $20,000.00 - $30, 000.00 day until Appellant receives his law license and is admitted to the bar.
5.) Prohibit any Attorney from delaying prosecution of this matter with frivolous continuances due to Appellant and family suffering behind said acts;
6.) For an Order Remanding every Party and attorneys disbarring them complicit in said Criminal Conspiratory acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties;
7.) For an Order Compelling all Parties to appear before a Court or Grand Jury to determine who should be INDICTED for their part in said Conspiracy;
8.) For an Order Appointing an Independent Examiner to ascertain all persons removed from the CHA section 8 program in the last 4 years where the City of Chicago, Human Relations Commission and Hearing Officers under CHA’s authority dismissed their complaints unlawfully;
9.) For the entry of an Order awarding to your Appellant for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Complainant
Counsel Pro se
